Design optimization of chirped FBG as a dispersion compensator

download Design optimization of chirped FBG as a dispersion compensator

of 4

Transcript of Design optimization of chirped FBG as a dispersion compensator

  • 8/13/2019 Design optimization of chirped FBG as a dispersion compensator

    1/4

    1

    Design optimization of chirped FBG as a dispersion

    compensator

    D. Aneesh1, A.Vishnu Vardhanan

    2, and R.Gangopadhyay

    3

    Dept. of Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering

    Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

    E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

    Abstract:Chirped fiber Bragg grating (FBG) provides an

    attractive solution for low cost dispersion compensation

    in a fiber optic transmission system. The present work

    carries out the design optimization of a chirped FBG in

    respect of chirp bandwidth and apodisation profile in

    achieving optimum dispersion compensation in a

    40Gbps optical transmission link for differentmodulation formats.

    1. Introduction:Linearly chirped fiber Bragg gratings are commonly usedfor dispersion compensation in 10Gbps optical transmission

    systems. The availability of mass production techniques and

    low cost has made this device very attractive for dispersion

    compensation. Even in higher bit rates such as 40Gbps case

    they are also found to be very effective.

    The performance of a chirped FBG is controlled by several

    parameters such as the length of the grating used for

    compensation, chirp bandwidth, apodisation profile, acindex modulation depth and the number of uniform steps in

    the grating. Several studies are carried out to optimizedesign procedure for dispersion compensating chirped FBG.

    The critical parameters for the design of a chirped FBG used

    as dispersion compensator are the grating length, chirped

    bandwidth and the apodisation profile. Conventional

    approach for choosing the length of the grating ( Lg ) basedon the knowledge of the signal bandwidth and amount of

    the fiber dispersion to be compensated. Such a procedure

    needs adhoc trial of fixing the length of the grating to be2Lg, 3Lg etc in order to achieve the best performance.

    However this approach does also consider how different

    modulation formats may require the FBG lengthoptimization.

    The present procedure determines the choice of the FBG

    length based on appropriate selection of chirped bandwidth

    containing a desired level of signal energy Ethdepending on

    the performance optimization required. It is known thatoptimization of apodisation profile has a distinctive role in

    ensuring minimum delay ripple across the gratingbandwidth. As per current literature the symmetric tanh

    apodisation is claimed to be the best apodisation profile. In

    the present study we show that further design optimizationcan be effected if one uses asymmetric tanh apodisation.

    .

    2. Design Procedure Optimization

    and SimulationA number of parameters are involved in the design of a fiber

    Bragg grating. The design of chirped FBG for dispersion

    compensation requires proper choice of various gratingrelated parameters. The following steps are involved in the

    design.

    1) Calculate the grating length as

    =

    nBDLL fg

    2

    2

    (1)

    Lf is the length of the fiber, D is the fiber dispersion

    parameter (ps/nm/km), B is the signal bandwidth, is the

    central wavelength and n is the effective refractive index.

    2) For a given length Lg the number of uniform sections ischosen to be 60 or higher. The grating simulation is carried

    out by transfer matrix approach [6] for an adequately chosenvalue of the chirp bandwidth, neff=1.45, ac modulation index

    at optimized value 1.2x10 -4 an and appropriate apodisation

    profile (tanh) to maintain a desired accuracy and the

    performance targets.

    3) For a chosen value of the chirped bandwidth it is further

    necessary to optimize the grating length to be 2Lg, 3Lg etc.

    in order to achieve the optimum result.

    It may be noted that the above choice of length also varies

    depending on the signal modulation used. This may beappreciated referring to Table 1 which shows that for the

    eye opening penalty (EOP) of 0.2 dB for the dispersion

    compensated 40Gbps signal at the output of the grating, the

    grating length differs depending on the value of the chirp

    bandwidth and the modulation format. The above designprocedure suffers because the choice of chirp bandwidth

    does not actually take into account the detailed nature of the

    signal spectrum.

  • 8/13/2019 Design optimization of chirped FBG as a dispersion compensator

    2/4

    2

    Table1: FBG parameters for an EOP of 0.2 dB for different

    modulation formats:

    ModulationFormat Length(cm)

    ChirpBandwidth(nm)

    NRZ 10.00 0.8

    21.00 1.6

    RZ 20.30 1.6

    26.30 2.0CSRZ 10.29 0.8

    20.68 1.6

    2.1 Present Design approachIn this design we tried to optimize the design in

    terms of the length of the grating, chirp bandwidth and

    apodisation. For all other parameters standard values are

    adopted. DC index modulation of zero and AC indexmodulation of 1.2x10 -4 are taken for all the cases. Number

    of steps in the calculation of grating is chosen to be 100.

    Length optimization:The choice of Lg can be simplified by taking B in (1) as the

    chirp bandwidth of the dispersion compensator. The

    interdependence of parameters in the past design andambiguity can be removed by this method.

    In order to find out the amount of chirped bandwidth neededfor effective compensation we consider the bandwidth

    containing energy above a certain threshold. For example

    Table2 shows the energy content in a specified bandwidthfor different modulation format. Based on the required EOP

    one can choose the signal bandwidth containing energy

    greater than the threshold. Based on this value of chirp

    bandwidth the grating length is calculated using (1).

    The above approach is used for the simulation based designof the chirped FBG for dispersion compensation. In the

    simulation a PN sequence of length 26-1 at 40Gbps isgenerated which is used to produce a modulated signal

    (NRZ, RZ and CSRZ) from the Mach Zahnder modulator.

    The output from Mach Zahnder modulator is coupled to a

    single mode fiber (D=16ps/nm/Km). The received output isfiltered by an optical Bessel filter (3dB

    bandwidth=160GHz) and after photo detection is filtered by

    an electrical filter (3dB bandwidth= 28GHz). Split step

    Fourier method is used to simulate the propagation through

    the fiber and transfer matrix method [6] is used forsimulation of the Bragg grating.

    The performance result of grating is expressed in terms ofEOP vs chirp bandwidth for different modulation formats.

    As one finds from Fig. 1 that depending on the modulation

    format appropriate chirp bandwidth needs to be utilized in

    the design for obtaining required EOP. It is also found fromsimulation that for an EOP of 0.2 dB the required energy

    threshold Eth =98%, 96% and 98% for NRZ, RZ and CSRZ

    respectively.

    Figure 2 also depicts the EOP performance with fiber lengthfor two different values of chirp bandwidth providing

    different levels of energy for NRZ signaling format.

    Table2. Energy content in a given signal bandwidth

    Percentage energy in a Bandwidth

    ( Eth)SignalBandwidth NRZ RZ CSRZ

    0.6 97.63 61.04 97.37

    0.8 97.81 87.30 98.25

    1 98.47 89.63 99.08

    1.2 98.78 90.21 99.75

    1.4 98.81 90.30 99.85

    1.8 99.18 91.05 99.91

    2 99.20 94.09 99.96

    3 99.50 95.12 100

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    0 2 4

    Chirp Bandwidth (nm)

    EOP(dB)

    NRZRZCSRZ

    Fig. 1. EOP variation of EOP for different chirp

    Bandwidth at 40Gbps

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    70 75 80 85 90

    Fiber Length (Km)

    EOP(dB)

    E=95% chirpBW=0.6nm

    E=99% chirpBW=1.6nm

    Fig. 2. EOP performance with distance for different chirp bandwidth

    providing different levels of energy for NRZ at 40Gbps

  • 8/13/2019 Design optimization of chirped FBG as a dispersion compensator

    3/4

    3

    Apodisation Optimization:Several investigations have been carried in the past out to

    find out the best apodisation profile for sidelobe suppression

    and improved time delay ripple performance [3] [7]. In

    literature it is found that symmetric tanh is the best known

    apodisation among these. We show here that further gratingimprovement can be effected if asymmetry is introduced in

    the tanh apodisation profile:

    ( )( )

    =

    LzkLL

    zLb

    kLzL

    az

    xf

    ,2

    tanh

    0,2

    tanh

    ..(2)

    where a and b are tanh window parameters and k is

    asymmetric apodisation parameter.

    Fig. 3. Asymmetric apodisation profiles

    Figure 3 shows several asymmetric apodisation profilesalong the grating length for different values of a, b and the kvalue varies in the range of 0.1 to 0.9. The impact of the

    slope asymmetry on both EOP and mean time delay ripple is

    shown in Figure 4. Compared to symmetric tanh profile

    asymmetric tanh profile provides significant improvement

    of grating performance.

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 0. 1 0 .2 0 .3 0. 4 0 .5 0. 6 0 .7 0 .8 0. 9 1

    Apodisation asymmtery(k)

    E

    OP(dB)

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    Averagetim

    edelay

    ripple(ps)EOP

    Avg.time delay

    Fig4.EOPand average time delay ripple versus apodisation asymmetry for

    NRZ at 40Gbps

    0

    0.51

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    70 75 80 85 90Fiber Length ( Km)

    EOP

    (dB)

    tanh a=4 b=4 k=.5

    tanh a=2 b=7 k=.8

    Fig. 5.Comparison of EOP for asymmetric and

    symmetric apodisation

    3. Conclusion

    A simple easy-to-use design optimization of chirped FBG asdispersion compensator is presented. In particular, the

    criterion for appropriate choice of the chirp bandwidthbased on threshold energy of the signal allows the

    determination of grating length automatically optimized.

    The procedure also easily accommodates length

    optimization for different modulation formats. Further,better length optimization can be achieved by introducing

    slope asymmetry in conventional tanh apodisation resulting

    in both decreased passband delay ripple and reduced EOP.

    References

    [1] P.Fernandez, J.C. Aguado, J.Blas, R.Duran, I.deMigfuel, J.Duran, R.M. Lorenzo and E.J. Abril,Analysis and Optimisation of the apodisation sharpness

    for linearly chirped dispersion compensation gratings,IEE proc-Optoelectronics, pp-69-73, April-2004.

    [2] D. Pastor, J.Capmany, D. Ortega, V. Tatay and J. Marti ,Design of apodized linearly chirped fiber grating fordispersion compensation, J.of Lightwave Technology,

    pp-2581-2588, November 1996.

    [3] K.Ennser, M.N. Zerva and R.I. Laming, Optimization

    of apodised linearly chirped fiber grating for opticalcommunications, IEEE J. of quantum technology, pp-770-777, May 1998.

    [4] K.Ennser, R I Laming and M.N. Zerva, Analysis of

    40Gbps TDM-Transmission over Embedded StandardFiber Employing Chirped Fiber Grating DispersionCompensators, J.Lightwave Technology, pp 807-811

    May 1998.

  • 8/13/2019 Design optimization of chirped FBG as a dispersion compensator

    4/4

    4

    [5] F. Ouellette, Dispersion cancellation using linearly

    chirped Bragg grating filters in optical waveguides,Optics Letters, pp 847-849, October 1987.

    [6] Raman Kashyap, Fiber Bragg Grating, Sen Deigo,Academic Press, 1999.

    [7] M.N. Zervas and D.Taverner, Asymmetrically apodized

    linearly chirped fiber Bragg gratings with improveddispersion characteristics, ECOC98, September 1998.