Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

56
Chapter 3: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure DR. AMIR PUTRA BIN MD SAAD C24-322 [email protected] | [email protected] mech.utm.my/amirputra

Transcript of Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

Page 1: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

Chapter 3: Design of

Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

DR. AMIR PUTRA BIN MD SAAD

C24-322

[email protected] | [email protected]

mech.utm.my/amirputra

Page 2: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.1 INTRODUCTION

Page 3: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.1 INTRODUCTION

i. Static conditions : (a) Loads are applied gradually, to give sufficient time for the strain to fully develop. OR (b) Abuse load are applied rapidly.

ii. Variable conditions : Stresses vary with time or fluctuate between different levels, also called repeated, alternating, or fluctuating stresses.

iii. When machine members are found to have failed under fluctuating stresses, the actual maximum stresses were well below the ultimate strength of the material, even below yielding strength.

iv. Since these failures are due to stresses repeating for a large number of times, they are called fatigue failures.

v. When machine parts fails statically, the usually develop a very large deflection, thus visible warning can be observed in advance; a fatigue failure gives no warning!

Page 4: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.2 FATIGUE FAILURE IN METALS

A fatigue failure arises from three stages of development:

- Stage I : initiation of microcracks due to cyclic plastic deformation (these cracks are not usually visible to the naked eyes).

- Stage II : propagation of microcracks to macrocracksforming parallel plateau like fracture surfaces separated by longitudinal ridges (in the form of dark and light bands referred to as beach marks).

- Stage III : fracture when the remaining material cannot support the loads.

Initiation

Propagation

Fracture

Page 5: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.3 FRACTURE PATTERNS OF FATIGUE FAILURE

Page 6: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.4 FATIGUE LIFE METHODS IN FATIGUE

FAILURE ANALYSIS

β€’ Let 𝑁 be the number of cycles to fatigue for a specified level of loading

- For 1 ≀ 𝑁 ≀ 103, generally classified as low-cycle fatigue

- For 𝑁 > 103, generally classified as high-cycle fatigue

β€’ Three fatigue life methods used in design and analysis are

1. Stress-Life Method : is based on stress only, least accurate especially for low-cyclefatigue; however, it is the most traditional and easiest to implement for a widerange of applications.

2. Strain-Life Method : involves more detailed analysis, especially good for low-cyclefatigue; however, idealizations in the methods make it less practical whenuncertainties are present.

3. Linear-Elastic Fracture Mechanics Method : assumes a crack is already present.Practical with computer codes in predicting in crack growth with respect to stressintensity factor

Page 7: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.5 STRESS-LIFE METHOD: R. R. MOORE

β€’ The most widely used fatigue-testing device is the R. R. Moore high-speedrotating-beam machine.

β€’ Specimens in R.R. Moore machines are subjected to pure bending by means ofadded weights.

β€’ Other fatigue-testing machines are available for applying fluctuating orreversed axial stresses, torsional stresses, or combined stresses to the testspecimens.

Page 8: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.6 S-N CURVE

β€’ In R. R. Moore machine tests, a constant bending load is applied, and thenumber of revolutions of the beam required for failure is recorded.

β€’ Tests at various bending stress levels are conducted.

β€’ These results are plotted as an S-N diagram.

β€’ Log plot is generally used to emphasize the bend in the S-N curve.

β€’ Ordinate of S-N curve is fatigue strength, 𝑆𝑓, at a specific number of cycles

Page 9: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.6 S-N CURVE

S-N diagram from the results of completely reversed axial fatigue test. Material : UNS G41300 steel.

Page 10: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.7 FATIGUE STRENGTH, 𝑆𝑓

β€’ Low-cycle fatigue considers the range from 𝑁 = 1 to about 1000 cycles.

β€’ In this region, the fatigue strength, 𝑆𝑓 is only slightly smaller than the tensile

strength, 𝑆𝑒𝑑.

β€’ High-cycle fatigue domain extends from 103 to the endurance limit life (106

to 107 cycles).

β€’ Experience has shown that high-cycle fatigue data are rectified by alogarithmic transform to both stress and cycles-to-failure.

Page 11: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

103

Number of Stress Cycles, N

Fatigue Strength, Sf (MPa)

Sut

f.Sut or S3

100 106

a

b

c

Finite Life Infinite Life

Low Cycle Fatigue High Cycle Fatigue

High Nominal Stress

Low Nominal Stress

Valid Zone for S-N Method

Sn

Components in S-N Curve:

3.7 FATIGUE STRENGTH, 𝑆𝑓

Page 12: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

For line b-c:

𝑆𝑓 = π‘Žπ‘π‘

where,

π‘Ž =(𝑆3)

2

𝑆𝑛′

𝑏 = βˆ’1

3log

𝑆3𝑆𝑛′

𝑁 =πœŽπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘£π‘Ž

1𝑏

𝑆3 = 0.75𝑆𝑒𝑑 for steels

103

Number of Stress Cycles,

N

Fatigue Strength, Sf (MPa)

Sn

Sut

f.Sut or S3

100 106

a

b

c

Valid Zone for S-N Method

3.7 FATIGUE STRENGTH, 𝑆𝑓

Page 13: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.8 CHARACTERISTICS OF S-N CURVES FOR METALS

β€’ In the case of steels, a knee occurs in the graph, and beyond this knee failure will not occur, no matter how great the number of cycles - this knee is called the endurance limit, denoted as 𝑆𝑛

β€² .

β€’ Non-ferrous metals and alloys do not have an endurance limit, since their S-N curve never become horizontal.

β€’ For materials with no endurance limit, the fatigue strength is normally reported at 𝑁 = 5 Γ— 108

β€’ 𝑁 = 1/2 is the simple tension test.

Aluminum Alloy

Page 14: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.14 BASIC TYPES OF FLUCTUATING STRESS

β€’ Example of loading history on the wind blades.

Page 15: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.14 BASIC TYPES OF FLUCTUATING STRESS

β€’ Fluctuating stresses often of sinusoidal patterns due to the nature of somerotating machinery.

β€’ The peaks of the wave are more important than its shape.β€’ Fluctuating stresses are described using a steady component and an alternating

component.

Page 16: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.14 BASIC TYPES OF FLUCTUATING STRESS

Tension-Compression or completely reversed stress

Tension-Zero stress or Repeated Stress

Tension-Tension stress or Fluctuating Stress

Three types of fluctuating stress:

Page 17: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.14 STRESS COMPONENTS IN A

CYCLIC STRESS

πΉπ‘š =πΉπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ + πΉπ‘šπ‘–π‘›

2

πœŽπ‘Ž =πœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ βˆ’ πœŽπ‘šπ‘–π‘›

2

πΉπ‘Ž =πΉπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ βˆ’ πΉπ‘šπ‘–π‘›

2

πœŽπ‘š =πœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ + πœŽπ‘šπ‘–π‘›

2

πœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ = maximum stress

πœŽπ‘šπ‘–π‘› = minimum stress

πœŽπ‘Ž = amplitude stress

πœŽπ‘š = midrange stress

Page 18: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.14 STRESS COMPONENTS IN A

CYCLIC STRESS

Page 19: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

π‘€π‘Žπ‘œ =π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯π‘œ βˆ’ π‘€π‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘œ

2; π‘€π‘šπ‘œ =

π‘€π‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯π‘œ + π‘€π‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘œ

2

πΉπ‘Žπ‘œ =πΉπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯π‘œ βˆ’ πΉπ‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘œ

2; πΉπ‘šπ‘œ=

πΉπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯π‘œ + πΉπ‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘œ

2

π‘‡π‘Žπ‘œ =Tmaxo βˆ’ Tmino

2; π‘‡π‘šπ‘œ =

Tmaxo + Tmino

2

Alternating Part Steady Part

Note: Subscript with o mean without consideration of stress concentration effect.

3.14 STRESS COMPONENTS IN A

CYCLIC STRESS

Page 20: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

Alternating Part Steady Part

πœŽπ‘Žπ‘œ =πœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯π‘œ βˆ’ πœŽπ‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘œ

2; πœŽπ‘šπ‘œ =

πœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯π‘œ + πœŽπ‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘œ

2

πœŽπ‘Žπ‘œ =πœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯π‘œ βˆ’ πœŽπ‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘œ

2; πœŽπ‘šπ‘œ =

πœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯π‘œ + πœŽπ‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘œ

2

πœπ‘Žπ‘œ =πœπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯π‘œ βˆ’ πœπ‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘œ

2; πœπ‘šπ‘œ =

πœπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯π‘œ + πœπ‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘œ

2

Note: Subscript with o mean without consideration of stress concentration effect.

3.14 STRESS COMPONENTS IN A

CYCLIC STRESS

Page 21: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

Figure 3.1 shows a sander machine. The most severe loading occurs when an object isheld near the periphery of the sander disk (100-mm radius at black dot as shown inFigure 3.1) with sufficient force to develop a friction torque of 12 Nm. Assume acoefficient of friction of 0.6 between the object and the disk.

3.15 SAMPLE PROBLEM

Figure 3.1: Sander Machine

Touch Point

Page 22: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

(i) Show all the acting loads on the sander disk.(ii) Draw free body diagram of the sander shaft. (iii) Identify the critical point.(iv) Draw all the cyclic stress.

3.15 SAMPLE PROBLEM

Figure 3.1: Sander Machine

Touch Point

Sander Disk

Sander Shaft

Page 23: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.9 ENDURANCE LIMIT, 𝑆𝑛′ FOR

STEELS

β€’ For steels, the endurance limit relates directly to the minimum tensile strength as observed in experimental measurements.

β€’ From the observations, the endurance of steels can be estimated as

𝑆𝑛′ = 0.5𝑆𝑒𝑑

β€’ with the prime mark on the endurance limit referring to the rotating-beam specimen.

Page 24: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.10 MODIFICATION FACTORS ON

ENDURANCE LIMIT

where,

i. 𝐢𝐿 = Load Factor

ii. 𝐢𝐺 = Size or Gradient Factor

iii. 𝐢𝑆 = Surface Condition Factor

iv. 𝐢𝑇 = Temperature Factor

v. 𝐢𝑅 = Reliability Factor

vi. 𝑆𝑛′ = Rotary-Beam Test Specimen Endurance Limit

𝑆𝑛 = 𝑆𝑛′ 𝐢𝐿𝐢𝐺𝐢𝑆𝐢𝑇𝐢𝑅

modification factors (Empirical Data)

Page 25: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.10.1 LOAD FACTOR, 𝐢𝐿

Load Factor, 𝐢𝐿 :

Page 26: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.10.2 GRADIENT FACTOR, 𝐢𝐺

Gradient Factor, 𝐢𝐺 :

Page 27: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.10.3 SURFACE FACTOR, 𝐢𝐿

Surface Factor, 𝐢𝐿 :

The surface modification factor depends on the quality of the finish of the actual part surface and on the tensile strength of the part material.

Page 28: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.10.4 TEMPERATURE FACTOR, 𝐢𝑇

Temperature Factor, 𝐢𝑇 :

Page 29: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.10.5 RELIABILITY FACTOR, 𝐢𝑅

Reliability Factor, 𝐢𝑅 :

Page 30: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

β€’ The fatigue stress concentration factor from the existence of irregularities or discontinuities in materials is defined a

where,

𝐾𝑑 is the static stress concentration factor.𝐾𝑓 is the fatigue stress concentration.

π‘ž is the notch sensitivity

3.11 FATIGUE STRESS CONCENTRATION

FACTOR, 𝐾𝑓 AND 𝐾𝑓𝑠

𝐾𝑓 = 1 + π‘ž(𝐾𝑑 βˆ’ 1)

𝐾𝑓𝑠 = 1 + π‘žπ‘ (𝐾𝑑𝑠 βˆ’ 1)

Bending or Axial

Torsion

Page 31: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.11 FATIGUE STRESS CONCENTRATION

FACTOR, 𝐾𝑓

Page 32: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.12 NOTCH SENSITIVITY FACTOR, π‘ž or π‘žπ‘ 

The ratio of Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor, Kf over Static StressConcentration Factor, Kt gives property of notch sensitivity, q.

π‘ž =𝐾𝑓 βˆ’ 1

𝐾𝑑 βˆ’ 1

π‘žπ‘  =𝐾𝑓𝑠 βˆ’ 1

𝐾𝑑𝑠 βˆ’ 1

Bending or Axial

Torsion

Page 33: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

* for reversed bending and reversed axial loadings

3.12 NOTCH SENSITIVITY FACTOR, π‘ž or π‘žπ‘ 

Page 34: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.13 STATIC STRESS CONCENTRATION

FACTOR, 𝐾𝑑

r/d: 2/40 = 0.05D/d: 60/40 = 1.5Kt = 2.38

Page 35: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.13 STATIC STRESS CONCENTRATION

FACTOR, 𝐾𝑑

r/d: 2 /40 = 0.05D/d: 60/40 = 1.5Kts = 1.66

Page 36: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

If 𝑆𝑒𝑑 = 900 MPa and 𝑆𝑦 = 750 MPa.

(v) Determine the endurance limit, 𝑆𝑛′ .

(vi) Determine all the modification factors (𝐢𝐿, 𝐢𝐺 , 𝐢𝑆, 𝐢𝑇 and 𝐢𝑅)(vii) Determine the corrected endurance limits, 𝑆𝑛.(viii) Determine the stress concentration factor/s (𝐾𝑠 or/and 𝐾𝑠𝑓).

3.16 SAMPLE PROBLEM

Page 37: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.17 MASTER FATIGUE DIAGRAM

𝐴 =πœŽπ‘ŽπœŽπ‘š

𝑅 =πœŽπ‘šπ‘–π‘›

πœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯

Page 38: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

Since the tests required to generate a Haigh or Master Diagram are quite

expensive, several empirical relationships which relate alternating stress

amplitude to mean stress have been developed. These relationships characterize

a material through its ultimate tensile strength, 𝑆𝑒𝑑, and are very convenient. For

infinite life design strategies, the methods use various curves to connect the

Endurance Limit, 𝑆𝑛, on the alternating stress axis to either the yield stress, 𝑆𝑦 or

ultimate strength, 𝑆𝑒𝑑 on the mean stress axis. Of all the proposed relationships,

three have been most widely accepted (i.e., those of Goodman, Soderberg or

Gerber).

3.18 FATIGUE FAILURE CRITERION

Page 39: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

Goodman

Langer

πœŽπ‘Žπ‘†π‘›

+πœŽπ‘šπ‘†π‘’π‘‘

=1

𝑛

πœŽπ‘Žπ‘†π‘¦

+πœŽπ‘šπ‘†π‘¦

=1

𝑛

3.18 FATIGUE FAILURE CRITERION

Goodman Line

Langer Line (Yield Line)𝑆𝑦

𝑆𝑦 𝑆𝑒𝑑

𝑆𝑛

Midrange Stress, πœŽπ‘š

Alt

ern

atin

g St

ress

, πœŽπ‘Ž

Page 40: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

𝑦

π‘Ž+π‘₯

𝑏= 1

3.18 FATIGUE FAILURE CRITERION

y

x

a

b

Page 41: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

βˆ— 𝑛 = safety factorπœŽπ‘Žπ‘†π‘›

+πœŽπ‘šπ‘†π‘’π‘‘

=1

𝑛

3.18 FATIGUE FAILURE CRITERION

Goodman Line

𝑆𝑒𝑑

𝑆𝑛

Midrange Stress, πœŽπ‘š

Alt

ern

atin

g St

ress

, πœŽπ‘Ž

𝑛 > 1

𝑛 < 1

Goodman

SAFE

FAIL

Infinite Life

Finite Life

Also called as Constant-Life Fatigue Diagram

Page 42: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

Various fluctuating uniaxial stresses,all of which correspond to equalfatigue life.

The existence of a static tensile stressreduces the amplitude of reversed stressthat can be superimposed. Figure on theright illustrates this concept. Fluctuation ais a completely reversed stresscorresponding to the endurance limitβ€”themean stress is zero and the alternatingstress Sn. Fluctuation b involves a tensilemean stress. In order to have an equal (inthis case, β€œinfinite”) fatigue life, thealternating stress must be less than Sn. Ingoing from b to c, d, e, and f, the meanstress continually increases; hence, thealternating stress must correspondinglydecrease.

3.18 FATIGUE FAILURE CRITERION

Page 43: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.18 FATIGUE FAILURE CRITERION

πœŽπ‘Ž

𝑆𝑒𝑑

𝑆𝑛

𝑆𝑓

𝑁 = 106𝑐𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑠

𝑁 = 105𝑐𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑠

𝑁 = 104𝑐𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑆𝑓

𝑆𝑓𝑁 = 103𝑐𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑠

πœŽπ‘š

number of cycles getting smaller

Constant Life Line

Page 44: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.18 FATIGUE FAILURE CRITERION

Constant-life fatigue diagram for ductile materials.

Page 45: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

Goodman

Langer

πœŽπ‘Žπ‘†π‘›

+πœŽπ‘šπ‘†π‘’π‘‘

=1

𝑛

πœŽπ‘Žπ‘†π‘¦

+πœŽπ‘šπ‘†π‘¦

=1

𝑛

3.16 FATIGUE FAILURE CRITERION

Modified Goodman Line

Langer Line (Yield Line)𝑆𝑦

𝑆𝑦 𝑆𝑒𝑑

𝑆𝑛

Midrange Stress, πœŽπ‘š

Alt

ern

atin

g St

ress

, πœŽπ‘Ž

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

𝑛 > 1

SAFEInfinite Life

Question: Explain the fatigue condition for all the points (a, b, c, d and e).

Page 46: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.18 SIMULTANEOUS ACTION OF BENDING,

TORSION AND AXIAL STRESSES WITH 𝐾𝑓

Equivalent Amplitude Stress, πœŽπ‘’π‘Ž is calculated using the Distortion Energy Theory:

Equivalent Midrange Stress, πœŽπ‘’π‘š is calculated using the Maximum Principal Stress. Use Mohr Circle Theory:

πœŽπ‘’π‘Ž = πœŽπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘œ + πœŽπ‘Žπ‘π‘œ2 + 3 πœπ‘Žπ‘œ

2

πœŽπ‘’π‘š =πœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘œ + πœŽπ‘šπ‘π‘œ

2+ πΎπ‘“π‘ πœπ‘šπ‘œ

2+

πœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘œ + πœŽπ‘šπ‘π‘œ

2

2

Axial Bending Torsion

Axial Bending Torsion

Page 47: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

STRENGTH

YOU ARE ALLOWED TO MODIFIED EITHER β€˜STRENGTH’

OR β€˜STRESS’ ONLY !

𝑆𝑛 = 𝑆𝑛′ 𝐢𝐿𝐢𝐺𝐢𝑆𝐢𝑇𝐢𝑅

reducing

increasing

OR

STRESS

πœŽπ‘Žπ‘Ž = πΎπ‘“π‘ŽπœŽπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘œ

πœŽπ‘šπ‘Ž = πΎπ‘“π‘ŽπœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘œ

πœπ‘Ž = πΎπ‘“π‘ πœπ‘Žπ‘œ

πœπ‘š = πΎπ‘“π‘ πœπ‘šπ‘œ

AXIAL

πœŽπ‘Žπ‘ = πΎπ‘“π‘πœŽπ‘Žπ‘π‘œ

πœŽπ‘šπ‘ = πΎπ‘“π‘πœŽπ‘šπ‘π‘œ

BENDING TORSION

Page 48: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

πœŽπ‘Ž = πΎπ‘“πœŽπ‘Žπ‘œ πœŽπ‘š = πΎπ‘“πœŽπ‘šπ‘œ

πœπ‘Ž = πΎπ‘“π‘ πœπ‘Žπ‘œ πœπ‘š = πΎπ‘“π‘ πœπ‘šπ‘œ

Note: Subscript with o mean without consideration of stress concentration effect.

Page 49: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

3.18 SIMULTANEOUS ACTION OF BENDING,

TORSION AND AXIAL STRESSES WITH 𝐾𝑓

Equivalent Amplitude Stress, πœŽπ‘’π‘Ž is calculated using the Distortion Energy Theory:

Equivalent Midrange Stress, πœŽπ‘’π‘š is calculated using the Maximum Principal Stress. Use Mohr Circle Theory:

πœŽπ‘’π‘Ž = πΎπ‘“π‘ŽπœŽπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘œ + πΎπ‘“π‘πœŽπ‘Žπ‘π‘œ2+ 3 πΎπ‘“π‘ πœπ‘Žπ‘œ

2

πœŽπ‘’π‘š =πΎπ‘“π‘ŽπœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘œ + πΎπ‘“π‘πœŽπ‘šπ‘π‘œ

2+ πΎπ‘“π‘ πœπ‘šπ‘œ

2+

πΎπ‘“π‘ŽπœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘œ + πΎπ‘“π‘πœŽπ‘šπ‘π‘œ

2

2

Page 50: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

(viii) Determine the alternating part, πœŽπ‘Žπ‘œ and πœπ‘Žπ‘œ.(ix) Determine the steady part, πœŽπ‘šπ‘œ and πœπ‘šπ‘œ.(x) Determine the alternating part, πœŽπ‘Ž and πœπ‘Ž.(xi) Determine the steady part, πœŽπ‘š and πœπ‘š.(xii) Determine the equivalent alternating part, πœŽπ‘’π‘Ž.(xiii) Determine the equivalent steady part, πœŽπ‘’π‘š.

3.19 SAMPLE PROBLEM

Page 51: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

(ix) Draw Fatigue Failure Diagram. Plot the operating point. (x) Calculate the Langer’s and Goodman’s safety factor.(xi) Determine the number of stress cycle, N.(xii) Give your critical comments on the results.

3.20 SAMPLE PROBLEM

Goodman

Langer

πœŽπ‘Žπ‘†π‘›

+πœŽπ‘šπ‘†π‘’π‘‘

=1

𝑛

πœŽπ‘Žπ‘†π‘¦

+πœŽπ‘šπ‘†π‘¦

=1

𝑛

Goodman Line

Langer Line (Yield Line)𝑆𝑦

𝑆𝑦 𝑆𝑒𝑑

𝑆𝑛

Midrange Stress, πœŽπ‘š

Alt

ern

atin

g St

ress

, πœŽπ‘Ž

Page 52: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

Example :

A component is subjected to a maximum cyclic stress of 750 MPa and aminimum of 70 MPa. The steel from which it is manufactured has an ultimatetensile strength, 𝑆𝑒𝑑 of 1050 MPa and a measured endurance limit, 𝑆𝑛 of 400MPa. The fully reversed stress at 1000 cycles is 750 MPa. Using the Goodmanfatigue failure criterion, calculate the component life.

Step 1: Determine the πœŽπ‘Ž and πœŽπ‘š:

πœŽπ‘Ž =πœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ βˆ’ πœŽπ‘šπ‘–π‘›

2=750 βˆ’ 70

2= 340 π‘€π‘ƒπ‘Ž

πœŽπ‘š =πœŽπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘₯ + πœŽπ‘šπ‘–π‘›

2=750 + 70

2= 410 π‘€π‘ƒπ‘Ž

3.21 SAMPLE PROBLEM

Page 53: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

β€’ Step 2: Choose failure criteria and then, determine the πœŽπ‘“ :

Sut = 1050 MPa

Sn = 400MPa

Οƒm = 410 MPa

Οƒa = 340MPa

SAFE

Οƒm

Οƒa

Οƒf

πœŽπ‘ŽπœŽπ‘“

+πœŽπ‘šπ‘†π‘’π‘‘

= 1

πœŽπ‘ŽπœŽπ‘“

+πœŽπ‘šπ‘†π‘’π‘‘

= 1

340

πœŽπ‘“+

410

1050= 1

πœŽπ‘“ = 557.8 π‘€π‘ƒπ‘ŽThese two points have the same number of cyclic life

3.17 EXAMPLE

Page 54: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

β€’ Step 3: Determine the a and b :

β€’ Step 4: Determine the number of cycles:

𝑆𝑓 = π‘Žπ‘π‘

𝑏 = βˆ’1

3log

𝑆3𝑆𝑛′ = βˆ’

1

3log

750

400= βˆ’0.091

π‘Ž =𝑆3

2

𝑆𝑛′ =

750 2

400= 1406.25

𝑁 =πœŽπ‘“

π‘Ž

1𝑏=

557.8

1406.25

1βˆ’0.091

= 2.544 Γ— 104 𝑐𝑦𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑠

3.17 EXAMPLE

Page 55: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure
Page 56: Design of Mechanical Failure Prevention 2: Fatigue Failure

Thank You

END