Fatigue Failure

47
Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 1 It has been recognized that a metal subjected to a repetitive or fluctuating stress will fail at a stress much lower than that required to cause failure on a single application of load. Failures occurring under conditions of dynamic loading are called fatigue failures. Fatigue Failure Fatigue failure is characterized by three stages Crack Initiation Crack Propagation Final Fracture

description

CONCEPT OF FATIGUE FAILURE

Transcript of Fatigue Failure

Page 1: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 1

It has been recognized that a metal subjected to a repetitive or fluctuating stress will fail at a stress much lower than that required to cause failure on a single application of load. Failures occurring under conditions of dynamic loading are called fatigue failures.

Fatigue Failure

Fatigue failure is characterized by three stages

Crack Initiation

Crack Propagation

Final Fracture

Page 2: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 2

Jack hammer component, shows no yielding before fracture.

Crack initiation site

Fracture zonePropagation zone, striation

Page 3: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 3

VW crank shaft – fatigue failure due to cyclic bending and torsional stresses

Fracture areaCrack initiation site

Propagation zone, striations

Page 4: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 4

928 Porsche timing pulley

Crack started at the fillet

Page 5: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 5

1.0-in. diameter steel pins from agricultural equipment.

Material; AISI/SAE 4140 low allow carbon steel

Fracture surface of a failed bolt. The fracture surface exhibited beach marks, which is characteristic of a fatigue failure.

Page 6: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 6

This long term fatigue crack in a high quality component took a considerable time to nucleate from a machining mark between the spider arms on this highly stressed surface. However once initiated propagation was rapid and accelerating as shown in the increased spacing of the 'beach marks' on the surface caused by the advancing fatigue crack.

bicycle crank spider arm

Page 7: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 7

Gear tooth failure

Crank shaft

Page 8: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 8

Hawaii, Aloha Flight 243, a Boeing 737, an upper part of the plane's cabin area rips off in mid-flight. Metal fatigue was the cause of the failure.

Page 9: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 9

Cup and ConeDimplesDull SurfaceInclusion at the bottom of the dimple

Ductile

Fracture Surface Characteristics

ShinyGrain Boundary cracking

Brittle Intergranular

ShinyCleavage fracturesFlat

Brittle Transgranular

BeachmarksStriations (SEM)Initiation sitesPropagation zoneFinal fracture zone

Fatigue

Mode of fracture Typical surface characteristics

Page 10: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 10

Fatigue Failure – Type of Fluctuating Stresses

a =max min

2

Alternating stress

Mean stress

m =max min

2+

min = 0

a = max / 2m =

a = max

max = - min

Page 11: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 11

Fatigue Failure, S-N Curve

Test specimen geometry for R.R. Moore rotating beam machine. The surface is polished in the axial direction. A constant bending load is applied.

Motor

Load

Rotating beam machine – applies fully reverse bending stress

Typical testing apparatus, pure bending

Page 12: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 12

The standard machine operates at an adjustable speed of 500 RPM to 10,000 RPM. At the nominal rate of 10,000 RPM, the R. R. Moore machine completes 600,000 cycles per hour, 14,400,000 cycles per day.

Bending moment capacity20 in-lb to 200 in-lb

Page 13: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 13

Fatigue Failure, S-N Curve

Finite life Infinite life

N < 103 N > 103

S′e

= endurance limit of the specimenSe′

Page 14: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 14

Relationship Between Endurance Limit and Ultimate Strength

Steel

Se =′

0.5Sut

100 ksi

700 MPa

Sut ≤ 200 ksi (1400 MPa)

Sut > 200 ksi

Sut > 1400 MPa

Steel

0.4Sut

Se =′

Sut < 60 ksi (400 MPa)

Sut ≥ 60 ksi24 ksi

160 MPa Sut < 400 MPa

Cast iron Cast iron

Page 15: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 15

Relationship Between Endurance Limit and Ultimate Strength

Aluminum alloys

Se =′

0.4Sut

19 ksi

130 MPa

Sut < 48 ksi (330 MPa)

Sut ≥ 48 ksi

Sut ≥ 330 MPa

Aluminum

For N = 5x108 cycle

Copper alloys

Se =′

0.4Sut

14 ksi

100 MPa

Sut < 40 ksi (280 MPa)

Sut ≥ 40 ksi

Sut ≥ 280 MPa

Copper alloys

For N = 5x108 cycle

Page 16: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 16

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit

= endurance limit of the specimen (infinite life > 106)Se′

For materials exhibiting a knee in the S-N curve at 106 cycles

= endurance limit of the actual component (infinite life > 106)Se

N

S Se

106103

= fatigue strength of the specimen (infinite life > 5x108)Sf′

= fatigue strength of the actual component (infinite life > 5x108)Sf

For materials that do not exhibit a knee in the S-N curve, the infinite life taken at 5x108 cycles

N

S Sf

5x108103

Page 17: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 17

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit

Se = Cload Csize Csurf Ctemp Crel (Se)′

• Load factor, Cload (page 326, Norton’s 3rd ed.)

Pure bending Cload = 1

Pure axial Cload = 0.7

Combined loading Cload = 1

Pure torsion Cload = 1 if von Mises stress is used, use 0.577 if von Mises stress is NOT used.

Sf = Cload Csize Csurf Ctemp Crel (Sf)′

or

Page 18: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 18

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit

• Size factor, Csize (p. 327, Norton’s 3rd ed.)

Larger parts fail at lower stresses than smaller parts. This is mainly due to the higher probability of flaws being present in larger components.

For rotating solid round cross section

d ≤ 0.3 in. (8 mm) Csize = 1

0.3 in. < d ≤ 10 in. Csize = .869(d)-0.097

8 mm < d ≤ 250 mm Csize = 1.189(d)-0.097

If the component is larger than 10 in., use Csize = .6

Page 19: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 19

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit

For non rotating components, use the 95% area approach to calculate the equivalent diameter. Then use this equivalent diameter in the previous equations to calculate the size factor.

dequiv = (A95

0.0766)1/2

dd95 = .95d

A95 = (π/4)[d2 – (.95d)2] = .0766 d2

dequiv = .37d

Solid or hollow non-rotating parts

dequiv = .808 (bh)1/2

Rectangular parts

Page 20: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 20

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit

I beams and C channels

Page 21: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 21

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit

• surface factor, Csurf (p. 328-9, Norton’s 3rd ed.)

The rotating beam test specimen has a polished surface. Most components do not have a polished surface. Scratches and imperfections on the surface act like a stress raisers and reduce the fatigue life of a part. Use either the graph or the equation with the table shown below.

Csurf = A (Sut)b

Page 22: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 22

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit

• Temperature factor, Ctemp (p.331, Norton’s 3rd ed.)

High temperatures reduce the fatigue life of a component. For accurate results, use an environmental chamber and obtain the endurance limit experimentally at the desired temperature.

For operating temperature below 450 oC (840 oF) the temperature factor should be taken as one.

Ctemp = 1 for T ≤ 450 oC (840 oF)

Page 23: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 23

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit

• Reliability factor, Crel (p. 331, Norton’s 3rd ed.)

The reliability correction factor accounts for the scatter and uncertainty of material properties (endurance limit).

Page 24: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 24

Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor, Kf

Experimental data shows that the actual stress concentration factor is not as high as indicated by the theoretical value, Kt. The stress concentration factor seems to be sensitive to the notch radius and the ultimate strength of the material.

(p. 340, Norton’s 3rd ed.)

Steel

Kf = 1 + (Kt – 1)qNotch sensitivity factor

Fatigue stress concentration factor

Page 25: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 25

Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor,

q for Aluminum

(p. 341, Norton’s 3rd ed.)

Page 26: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 26

Design process – Fully Reversed Loading for Infinite Life • Determine the maximum alternating applied stress (a ) in terms of

the size and cross sectional profile

• Select material → Sy, Sut

• Use the design equation to calculate the size

SeKf a = n

• Choose a safety factor → n

• Determine all modifying factors and calculate the endurance limit of the component → Se

• Determine the fatigue stress concentration factor, Kf

• Investigate different cross sections (profiles), optimize for size or weight

• You may also assume a profile and size, calculate the alternating stress and determine the safety factor. Iterate until you obtain the desired safety factor

Page 27: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 27

Design for Finite Life

Sn = a (N)b equation of the fatigue line

N

S

Se

106103

A

B

N

S

Sf

5x108103

A

B

Point ASn = .9Sut

N = 103Point A

Sn = .9Sut

N = 103

Point BSn = Sf

N = 5x108Point B

Sn = Se

N = 106

Page 28: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 28

Design for Finite Life

Sn = a (N)blog Sn = log a + b log N

Apply boundary conditions for point A and B to find the two constants “a” and “b”

log .9Sut = log a + b log 103

log Se = log a + b log 106

a =(.9Sut)

2

Se

b =.9Sut

Se

1

3log

SnKf a = n Design equation

Calculate Sn and replace Se in the design equation

Sn = Se (N

106)⅓ (

Se

.9Sut

)log

Page 29: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 29

The Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue Life

Mean stress exist if the loading is of a repeating or fluctuating type.

Mean stress

Alternating stress

m

a

Se

SySoderberg lineSut

Goodman line

Gerber curve

Mean stress is not zero

Page 30: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 30

The Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue Life Modified Goodman Diagram

Mean stress

Alternating stress

m

a

Sut

Goodman line

Sy

Sy

Se

Safe zoneC

Yield line

Page 31: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 31

- Syc

The Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue Life Modified Goodman Diagram

+m

a

Sut

Goodman line

Sy Yield line

Safe zone

- m

C

Sy

Se

Safe zone

Page 32: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 32

The Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue Life Modified Goodman Diagram

+m

a

Sut

Safe zone

- m

C

Sy

Safe zone

Se

- Syc

Finite lifeSn

1=Sut

a m+

Fatigue, m > 0Fatigue, m ≤ 0

a =Se

nf

a + m =Syc

ny

Yield

a + m =Sy

ny

Yield

nfSe

1=

Sut

a m+ Infinite life

Page 33: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 33

Applying Stress Concentration factor to Alternating and Mean Components of Stress

• Determine the fatigue stress concentration factor, Kf, apply directly to

the alternating stress → Kf a

• If Kf max < Sy then there is no yielding at the notch, use Kfm = Kf

and multiply the mean stress by Kfm → Kfm m

• If Kf max > Sy then there is local yielding at the notch, material at the notch is strain-hardened. The effect of stress concentration is reduced.

Calculate the stress concentration factor for the mean stress using the following equation,

Kfm =Sy Kf a

m

nfSe

1=

Sut

Kf a Kfmm+ Infinite life

Fatigue design equation

Page 34: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 34

Combined Loading

All four components of stress exist,

xa alternating component of normal stress

xm mean component of normal stress

xya alternating component of shear stress

xym mean component of shear stress

Calculate the alternating and mean principal stresses,

1a, 2a = (xa /2) ± (xa /2)2 + (xya)2

1m, 2m = (xm /2) ± (xm /2)2 + (xym)2

Page 35: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 35

Combined Loading

Calculate the alternating and mean von Mises stresses,

a′ = (1a + 2a - 1a2a)1/2

2 2

m′ = (1m + 2m - 1m2m)1/2 2 2

Fatigue design equation

nfSe

1=

Sut

′a ′m+ Infinite life

Page 36: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 36

Design Example

R1 R2

10,000 lb.

6˝6˝12˝D = 1.5dd

r (fillet radius) = .1d

A rotating shaft is carrying 10,000 lb force as shown. The shaft is made of steel with

Sut = 120 ksi and Sy = 90 ksi. The shaft is rotating at 1150 rpm and has a machine finish surface. Determine the diameter, d, for 75 minutes life. Use safety factor of 1.6 and 50% reliability.

Calculate the support forces, R1 = 2500, R2 = 7500 lb.

A

The critical location is at the fillet, MA = 2500 x 12 = 30,000 lb-in

a = Calculate the alternating stress, McI

=32M

πd 3=

305577

d 3m = 0

Determine the stress concentration factor

rd

= .1

Dd

= 1.5

Kt = 1.7

Page 37: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 37

Design ExampleAssume d = 1.0 in

Using r = .1 and Sut = 120 ksi, q (notch sensitivity) = .85

Kf = 1 + (Kt – 1)q = 1 + .85(1.7 – 1) = 1.6

Calculate the endurance limit

Cload = 1 (pure bending)

Crel = 1 (50% rel.)

Ctemp= 1 (room temp)

Csurf = A (Sut)b = 2.7(120)

-.265 = .759

0.3 in. < d ≤ 10 in. Csize = .869(d)-0.097 = .869(1)-0.097 = .869

Se = Cload Csize Csurf Ctemp Crel (Se) = (.759)(.869)(.5x120) = 39.57 ksi′

Page 38: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 38

Design ExampleDesign life, N = 1150 x 75 = 86250 cycles

Sn = Se (N

106)⅓ (

Se

.9Sut

)logSn = 39.57 (

86250

106)⅓ (

39.57.9x120

)log

= 56.5 ksi

a = 305577

d 3= 305.577 ksi n =

Sn

Kfa

=56.5

1.6x305.577= .116 < 1.6

So d = 1.0 in. is too small

Assume d = 2.5 in

All factors remain the same except the size factor and notch sensitivity.

Using r = .25 and Sut = 120 ksi, q (notch sensitivity) = .9

Kf = 1 + (Kt – 1)q = 1 + .9(1.7 – 1) = 1.63

Csize = .869(d)-0.097 = .869(2.5)-0.097 = .795 Se = 36.2 ksi→

Page 39: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 39

Design Example

a = 305577

(2.5)3= 19.55 ksi

n = Sn

Kfa

=53.35

1.63x19.55= 1.67 ≈ 1.6

d = 2.5 in.

Check yielding

n = Sy

Kfmax

= 90

1.63x19.55= 2.8 > 1.6 okay

Se = 36.2 ksi → Sn = 36.20 (86250

106)⅓ (

36.2.9x120

)log

= 53.35 ksi

Page 40: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 40

Design Example – Observations

n = Sn

Kfa

=56.5

1.6x305.577= .116 < 1.6

So d = 1.0 in. is too small

Calculate an approximate diameter

n = Sn

Kfa

=56.5

1.6x305.577/d 3 = 1.6 → d = 2.4 in. So, your next guess should be between 2.25 to 2.5

Mmax (under the load) = 7500 x 6 = 45,000 lb-in

Check the location of maximum moment for possible failure

R1 R2 = 7500

6˝6˝12˝D = 1.5dd

r (fillet radius) = .1d

A

MA (at the fillet) = 2500 x 12 = 30,000 lb-in

But, applying the fatigue stress conc. Factor of 1.63, Kf MA = 1.63x30,000 = 48,900 > 45,000

Page 41: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 41

ExampleA section of a component is shown. The material is steel with Sut = 620 MPa and a fully corrected endurance limit of Se = 180 MPa. The applied axial load varies from 2,000 to 10,000 N. Use modified Goodman diagram and find the safety factor at the fillet A, groove B and hole C. Which location is likely to fail first? Use Kfm = 1

Pa = (Pmax – Pmin) / 2 = 4000 N Pm = (Pmax + Pmin) / 2 = 6000 N

Fillet

rd

= .16

Dd

= 1.4

425

=

3525

=Kt = 1.76

Page 42: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 42

Example

Kf = 1 + (Kt – 1)q = 1 + .85(1.76 – 1) = 1.65

Calculate the alternating and the mean stresses,

a = Pa

A=

4000

25x5= 52.8 MPaKf 1.65

m = Pm

A=

6000

25x5= 48 MPa

nSe

1=

Sut

a m+ Infinite life

Fatigue design equation

n = 2.7n180

1=

62052.8 48

+ →

Using r = 4 and Sut = 620 MPa, q (notch sensitivity) = .85

Page 43: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 43

ExampleHole

dw

= .143535

= → Kt = 2.6

Using r = 2.5 and Sut = 620 MPa, q (notch sensitivity) = .82

Kf = 1 + (Kt – 1)q = 1 + .82(2.6 – 1) = 2.3

Calculate the alternating and the mean stresses,

a = Pa

A=

4000

(35-5)5= 61.33 MPaKf 2.3

m = Pm

A=

6000

30x5= 40 MPa

n = 2.5n180

1=

62061.33 40

+ →

Page 44: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 44

ExampleGroove

rd

= .103

Dd

= 1.2

329

=

3529

=

→ Kt = 2.33

Using r = 3 and Sut = 620 MPa, q (notch sensitivity) = .83

Kf = 1 + (Kt – 1)q = 1 + .83(2.33 – 1) = 2.1

(35-6)5

Calculate the alternating and the mean stresses,

a = Pa

A=

4000= 58.0 MPaKf 2.1

m = Pm

A=

6000

29x5= 41.4 MPa

n = 2.57n180

1=

62058.0 41.4

+ →

The part is likely to fail at the hole, has the lowest safety factor

Page 45: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 45

Example

Fa = (Fmax – Fmin) / 2 = 7.5 lb. Fm = (Fmax + Fmin) / 2 = 22.5 lb.

The figure shows a formed round wire cantilever spring subjected to a varying force F. The wire is made of steel with Sut = 150 ksi. The mounting detail is such that the stress concentration could be neglected. A visual inspection of the spring indicates that the surface finish corresponds closely to a hot-rolled finish. For a reliability of 99%, what number of load applications is likely to cause failure.

Ma = 7.5 x 16 = 120 in - lb Mm = 22.5 x 16 = 360 in - lb

a = McI

=32Ma

πd 3 =32(120)

π (.375)3

= 23178.6 psi

m = McI

=32Mm

πd 3=

32(360)

π (.375)3

= 69536 psi

Page 46: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 46

Example

Cload = 1 (pure bending)

Ctemp= 1 (room temp)

Calculate the endurance limit

Crel= .814 (99% reliability)

Csurf = A (Sut)b = 14.4(150)

-.718 = .394

A95 = .010462 d 2 (non-rotating round section)

dequiv = √ A95 / .0766 = .37d = .37 x.375 = .14

dequiv = .14 < .3 → Csize = 1.0

Se = Cload Csize Csurf Ctemp Crel (Se) = (.394)(.814)(.5x150) = 24.077 ksi

nSe

1=

Sut

a m+ →

n24077

1=

150000

23178.6 69536+ → n = .7 < 1

Finite life

Sn

1=Sut

a m+

Find Sn, strength for finite number of cycle

Sn

1=150000

23178.6 69536+→ → Sn = 43207 psi

Page 47: Fatigue Failure

Ken Youssefi MAE dept., SJSU 47

Example

Sn = Se (N

106)⅓ (

Se

.9Sut

)log

43207 = 24077 (N

106)⅓ (

24.077.9x150

)log

N = 96,000 cycles