Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Class Number ......Class Number: 16007 Dept. of...

Section: ALEC

Class Number: 16007

Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering

BMS 4324: Advanced Cell and Molecular Biology II

Response Rate: 9/10

Fall 2016 Course Evaluation - ResultsLecture

#

Resp

No Yes Decline To

AnswerA. Procedures and Policies

Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 12.5% 87.5% 8

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerB. The Lecture Instructor

Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 11.1% 22.2% 22.2% 3.0 44.4% 9

Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 11.1% 22.2% 44.4% 3.4 22.2% 9

Q11 The Lecture Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 44.4% 11.1% 4.3 44.4% 9

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerC. Graded Assignments and Exams

Q15 The Lecture Instructor provided helpful feedback on assessed class components

(e.g., exams, papers).

44.4% 11.1% 11.1% 4.1 33.3% 9

Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 33.3% 11.1% 4.1 55.6% 9

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course

Q01 The course objectives were clearly stated. 55.6% 11.1% 4.4 33.3% 9

Q21 The course was well organized. 44.4% 33.3% 3.8 22.2% 9

Q22 The course was intellectually stimulating. 12.5% 25.0% 25.0% 3.4 37.5% 8

Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 77.8% 4.8 22.2% 9

Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 3.6 33.3% 9

Q40 Value was added to my education. 11.1% 22.2% 11.1% 11.1% 3.6 44.4% 9

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Very Poor Poor Adequate Good Excellent Decline To

AnswerH. Overall Evaluations

Q41 Overall evaluation of the instructor. 11.1% 11.1% 44.4% 3.4 33.3% 9

Q43 Overall evaluation of the course. 33.3% 44.4% 2.9 22.2% 9

Office of Assessment and Institutional ResearchPage 1 of 3

13-February-2017

Section: A2

Class Number: 15227

Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering

BE 6453: Probability and Stochastic Processes

Response Rate: 69/72


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To



Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 2.9% 68.1% 1.4% 4.3% 4.5 23.2% 69

Q11 The Lecture Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 2.9% 53.6% 7.2% 5.8% 4.2 30.4% 69

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




5.8% 42.0% 8.7% 7.2% 4.0 36.2% 69

Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 1.4% 42.0% 7.2% 15.9% 4.1 33.3% 69

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course

Q01 The course objectives were clearly stated. 2.9% 60.9% 2.9% 1.4% 4.4 31.9% 69

Q21 The course was well organized. 1.4% 58.0% 5.8% 4.3% 4.4 30.4% 69

Q22 The course was intellectually stimulating. 2.9% 55.1% 4.3% 4.3% 4.3 33.3% 69

Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 1.4% 40.6% 7.2% 13.0% 4.1 37.7% 69

Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 18.8% 26.1% 18.8% 5.8% 3.3 30.4% 69

Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.4% 52.9% 1.5% 2.9% 4.4% 4.3 33.8% 68

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp



Q41 Overall evaluation of the instructor. 4.3% 49.3% 1.4% 7.2% 4.3 37.7% 69

Q43 Overall evaluation of the course. 4.3% 37.7% 2.9% 17.4% 4.0 37.7% 69


13-February-2017

Section: A

Class Number: 15900

General Studies

GS 105: MATH SEMINAR

Response Rate: 7/55


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To


Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 14.3% 71.4% 14.3% 7

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




Q11 The Lecture Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 28.6% 14.3% 42.9% 3.8 14.3% 7

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




28.6% 14.3% 42.9% 3.8 14.3% 7


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

No Yes Decline To

AnswerD. Course

Q01 The course objectives were clearly stated. 14.3% 85.7% 4.4 7



Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 14.3% 14.3% 28.6% 3.8 42.9% 7


Q40 Value was added to my education. 28.6% 28.6% 4.0 42.9% 7

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To



Q43 Overall evaluation of the course. 14.3% 28.6% 14.3% 42.9% 3.2 7


13-February-2017

Section: A

Class Number: 16146

Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering

AE 4653: Aircraft Flight Mechanics

Response Rate: 23/35Primary Instructor: ---


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To


Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail at the beginning of the course. 100.0% 22

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To



Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 56.5% 8.7% 4.5 34.8% 23


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




65.2% 4.7 34.8% 23

Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 56.5% 4.6 43.5% 23

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course


Q21 The course was well organized. 60.9% 4.6 39.1% 23


Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 65.2% 4.3% 4.6 30.4% 23

Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 54.5% 4.5% 4.5 40.9% 22


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerE. Course Objectives - As a result of taking this course:

Q27 I understand the fundamental equations of motion for flying objects. 65.2% 4.3% 4.6 30.4% 23

Q28 I understand various flight conditions. 73.9% 4.3% 4.7 21.7% 23

Q29 I understand static stability for aircraft. 56.5% 8.7% 4.5 34.8% 23

Q30 I am able to calculate stability conditions for aircraft. 56.5% 8.7% 8.7% 4.3 26.1% 23

Q31 I understand the various modes of motion of aircraft. 65.2% 4.3% 4.6 30.4% 23

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp





Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerP. ABET- As a result of taking this course:

A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 69.6% 4.3% 4.7 26.1% 23

A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet

desired needs

4.3% 65.2% 4.3% 4.5 26.1% 23

A37 I have enhanced my ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems 69.6% 4.3% 4.3% 4.6 21.7% 23

A43 I have enhanced my ability to use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools

necessary for engineering practice

69.6% 8.7% 4.6 21.7% 23


13-February-2017

Section: A

Class Number: 21735

Dept. of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering

ME 6823: Energy Policy, Regulations, and Incentives

Response Rate: 12/14Primary Instructor: Cekirge, Huseyin Murat


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 8.3% 3.3 41.7% 12

Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 16.7% 33.3% 8.3% 16.7% 3.5 25.0% 12


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




16.7% 25.0% 8.3% 8.3% 3.5 41.7% 12


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course







Avg Of

Results

#

Resp






13-February-2017

Section: ALEC

Class Number: 15768

Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering

CM 2213: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY I

Response Rate: 39/93Primary Instructor: Ulman,Abraham


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 5.1% 66.7% 2.6% 5.1% 4.5 20.5% 39

Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 12.8% 30.8% 5.1% 10.3% 7.7% 3.6 33.3% 39

Q11 The Lecture Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 21.1% 13.2% 2.6% 26.3% 7.9% 2.9 28.9% 38

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




25.6% 20.5% 2.6% 17.9% 7.7% 3.0 25.6% 39

Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 17.9% 17.9% 2.6% 10.3% 17.9% 3.2 33.3% 39

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course

Q01 The course objectives were clearly stated. 10.3% 30.8% 2.6% 7.7% 12.8% 3.7 35.9% 39

Q21 The course was well organized. 25.6% 12.8% 2.6% 33.3% 10.3% 2.6 15.4% 39

Q22 The course was intellectually stimulating. 12.8% 25.6% 5.1% 15.4% 10.3% 3.4 30.8% 39

Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 2.6% 64.1% 2.6% 5.1% 5.1% 4.4 20.5% 39

Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 15.4% 25.6% 2.6% 5.1% 20.5% 3.5 30.8% 39


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp



Q41 Overall evaluation of the instructor. 12.8% 17.9% 2.6% 25.6% 20.5% 3.1 20.5% 39

Q43 Overall evaluation of the course. 12.8% 15.4% 2.6% 15.4% 28.2% 3.2 25.6% 39

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


A33 I have enhanced my ability to apply knowledge of math, science and engineering 7.9% 26.3% 2.6% 7.9% 15.8% 3.7 39.5% 38


13-February-2017

Section: INET

Class Number: 15125

Dept. of Technology Management & Innovation

MG 6233: Training Systems in Organizations

Response Rate: 2/6Primary Instructor: Dorin,Philip A


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 2

Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2

Q11 The Lecture Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 4.0 100.0% 2

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2

Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

No Yes Decline To

AnswerD. Course

Q01 The course objectives were clearly stated. 100.0% 5.0 2


Q22 The course was intellectually stimulating. 4.0 100.0% 2

Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2

Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2

Q40 Value was added to my education. 4.0 100.0% 2

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2

Q28 I now have a thorough understanding of the various topics discussed and their role

in the profession.

4.0 100.0% 2

Q29 I have developed an understanding of the concepts relevant to my current or

intended position and career.

50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2

Q30 I developed an understanding of the importance of being interactive/participative

in solving contemporary managerial issues.

4.0 100.0% 2

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerE1. Online Course Module

L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 50.0% 50.0% 3.5 2

L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 100.0% 5.0 2

L22 The Instructor responded to students in a timely manner and/or had virtual office

hours.

100.0% 5.0 2

L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2

L24 The online course materials and online assignments were well-organized, easy to

follow and were effective learning tools.

4.0 100.0% 2

L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2

L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 50.0% 4.5 50.0% 2

L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 100.0% 3.0 2

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q41 Overall evaluation of the instructor. 50.0% 50.0% 4.0 2

Q43 Overall evaluation of the course. 50.0% 3.5 50.0% 2


13-February-2017

Section: I

Class Number: 20368

Dept. of Civil & Urban Engineering

CE 6253: STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS

Response Rate: 21/22Primary Instructor: Morgan,Troy


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 95.0% 5.0 5.0% 20

Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 95.2% 4.8% 5.0 21

Q11 The Lecture Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 100.0% 5.0 21

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




76.2% 4.8 23.8% 21


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course



Q22 The course was intellectually stimulating. 90.5% 4.9 9.5% 21

Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 81.0% 4.8 19.0% 21


Q40 Value was added to my education. 95.0% 5.0 5.0% 20

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp



Q41 Overall evaluation of the instructor. 95.2% 5.0 4.8% 21



13-February-2017

Section: INET

Class Number: 14615

Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering

CS 5303: INTRODUCTION TO PROGRAMMING AND PROBLEM SOLVING

Response Rate: 7/11Primary Instructor: Ozkan,Ozgur


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 42.9% 14.3% 4.3 42.9% 7

Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 42.9% 28.6% 4.1 28.6% 7


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




14.3% 28.6% 14.3% 3.6 42.9% 7

Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 85.7% 14.3% 4.6 7

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

No Yes Decline To

AnswerD. Course



Q22 The course was intellectually stimulating. 42.9% 14.3% 4.1 42.9% 7

Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 28.6% 28.6% 14.3% 3.6 28.6% 7

L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 28.6% 14.3% 28.6% 3.0 28.6% 7


hours.

71.4% 14.3% 4.6 14.3% 7

L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 14.3% 42.9% 14.3% 14.3% 3.6 14.3% 7



57.1% 14.3% 4.3 28.6% 7

L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 57.1% 28.6% 4.0 14.3% 7

L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 57.1% 14.3% 14.3% 4.3 14.3% 7

L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 14.3% 14.3% 57.1% 3.5 14.3% 7

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q41 Overall evaluation of the instructor. 28.6% 14.3% 4.1 57.1% 7



13-February-2017

Section: INET

Class Number: 15163

Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering

CS 6003: Foundations of Computer Science

Response Rate: 20/30Primary Instructor: Ozkan,Ozgur


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 10.0% 25.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 3.4 20.0% 20

Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 5.0% 25.0% 15.0% 25.0% 3.6 30.0% 20


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




10.0% 30.0% 15.0% 5.0% 3.7 40.0% 20

Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 5.0% 50.0% 5.0% 4.3 40.0% 20

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

No Yes Decline To

AnswerD. Course




Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 10.0% 30.0% 5.0% 15.0% 3.8 40.0% 20



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 15.0% 25.0% 20.0% 20.0% 3.2 20.0% 20

L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 15.0% 20.0% 10.0% 20.0% 3.4 35.0% 20


hours.

10.0% 30.0% 25.0% 25.0% 3.3 10.0% 20

L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 5.0% 15.0% 5.0% 25.0% 20.0% 3.3 30.0% 20



15.0% 30.0% 5.0% 15.0% 3.6 35.0% 20

L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 10.0% 35.0% 5.0% 15.0% 3.8 35.0% 20

L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 5.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 3.6 35.0% 20

L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 5.0% 20.0% 5.0% 5.0% 40.0% 3.5 25.0% 20

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To





13-February-2017

Section: I

Class Number: 21199


EL 6623: Power Systems Economics and Planning

Response Rate: 15/17Primary Instructor: Dvorkin,Yury Valentinovich


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To



Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 6.7% 73.3% 4.5 20.0% 15


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




73.3% 13.3% 4.5 13.3% 15


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course




Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 7.1% 57.1% 4.4 35.7% 14


Q40 Value was added to my education. 6.7% 60.0% 6.7% 4.3 26.7% 15

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp




Q43 Overall evaluation of the course. 60.0% 6.7% 13.3% 4.3 20.0% 15


13-February-2017

Section: LEC

Class Number: 15797


EE 3124: Fundamentals of Electronics II

Response Rate: 24/28Primary Instructor: Knox,Michael E.


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




Q11 The Lecture Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 24

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




75.0% 4.2% 4.7 20.8% 24


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course

Q01 The course objectives were clearly stated. 91.7% 4.9 8.3% 24



Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 66.7% 4.2% 12.5% 4.5 16.7% 24



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp






13-February-2017

Section: A1LB

Class Number: 15799




Fall 2016 Course Evaluation - ResultsLaboratory

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerA1. Regarding The Laboratory

L32 Laboratory rules and procedures, including safety, were explained in detail at the

beginning of the laboratory program

100.0% 5.0 6

L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerB1. The Laboratory Instructor

L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 100.0% 5.0 6

L11 The Laboratory Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 100.0% 5.0 6

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


L15 The Laboratory Instructor provided helpful feedback on assessed class components

(e.g., reports, quizzes, etc.).

100.0% 5.0 6

L19 My Working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course


Q21 The course was well organized. 100.0% 5.0 6

Q22 The course was intellectually stimulating. 100.0% 5.0 6

Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 83.3% 16.7% 4.7 6

Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 100.0% 5.0 6

Q40 Value was added to my education. 100.0% 5.0 6

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp



L41 Overall evaluation of the Laboratory Instructor. 100.0% 5.0 6

L43 Overall evaluation of the course. 100.0% 5.0 6


13-February-2017

Section: A2LB

Class Number: 15800





Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




100.0% 5.0 6


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




100.0% 5.0 6


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course




Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp



L41 Overall evaluation of the Laboratory Instructor. 83.3% 4.8 16.7% 6

L43 Overall evaluation of the course. 66.7% 4.7 33.3% 6


13-February-2017

Section: B2LB

Class Number: 16010





Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




100.0% 5.0 5


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 80.0% 20.0% 4.4 5

L11 The Laboratory Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 80.0% 20.0% 4.4 5

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




80.0% 20.0% 4.6 5


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course



Q22 The course was intellectually stimulating. 80.0% 20.0% 4.6 5




Avg Of

Results

#

Resp



L41 Overall evaluation of the Laboratory Instructor. 80.0% 20.0% 4.6 5



13-February-2017

Section: B1LB

Class Number: 16021





Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




100.0% 5.0 2

L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 100.0% 5.0 2

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




100.0% 5.0 2

L19 My Working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 2

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course




Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 2



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp






13-February-2017

Section: LEC

Class Number: 15601


EE 4183: WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS



#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To



Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 92.9% 4.9 7.1% 14


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




71.4% 7.1% 4.6 21.4% 14


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course







Avg Of

Results

#

Resp






13-February-2017

Section: I1

Class Number: 14694

Dept. of Finance & Risk Engineering

FRE 6831: COMPUTATIONAL FINANCE LABORATORY

Response Rate: 4/9Primary Instructor: Rubinraut,Moise


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




100.0% 5.0 4

L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 100.0% 5.0 4

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


L06 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 4



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




75.0% 4.8 25.0% 4

L19 My Working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 100.0% 5.0 4

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

No Yes Decline To

AnswerD. Course




Q23 Textbook/Lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 5.0 4



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




13-February-2017

Section: A

Class Number: 15960

Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society

STS 2604: Ethics and Engineering

Response Rate: 21/26Primary Instructor: Stein,Jordan


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To





Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




47.6% 4.8% 4.8% 4.3 42.9% 21

Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 71.4% 4.8% 4.7 23.8% 21

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course


Q21 The course was well organized. 57.1% 4.8% 4.8% 4.4 33.3% 21





Avg Of

Results

#

Resp






13-February-2017

Section: A1LC

Class Number: 15650

Dept. of General Engineering

EG 1003: Introduction to Engineering and Design

Response Rate: 208/298Primary Instructor: Georgi,Gunter W


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 0.5% 61.3% 0.5% 2.5% 14.2% 4.4 21.1% 204



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




4.9% 32.0% 0.5% 8.9% 22.7% 3.8 31.0% 203


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course

Q01 The course objectives were clearly stated. 1.5% 52.0% 4.4% 4.9% 4.3 37.3% 204




Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 6.9% 32.0% 0.5% 10.8% 10.8% 3.8 38.9% 203


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q27 In this course we gain an understanding of the design process. 2.0% 49.0% 4.4% 5.9% 4.3 38.7% 204

Q28 In the course project we gained an understanding of contemporary engineering

practice.

2.5% 41.1% 5.0% 8.9% 4.1 42.6% 202

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp





Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerL1. Regarding the Laboratory



0.5% 60.6% 0.5% 4.9% 7.9% 4.4 25.6% 203

L33 Laboratory equipment is in good condition and is operable. 9.4% 28.1% 16.7% 9.4% 3.6 36.5% 203

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerL2. The Laboratory Instructor

L06 The Laboratory Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 56.7% 3.9% 8.9% 4.4 30.5% 203

L10 The Laboratory Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions. 0.5% 74.8% 1.5% 2.5% 4.7 20.8% 202

L11 The Laboratory Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 2.0% 67.5% 1.5% 6.0% 4.5 23.0% 200



2.0% 54.5% 0.5% 4.0% 13.9% 4.3 25.2% 202

L19 My Working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 1.0% 49.8% 0.5% 3.4% 11.3% 4.3 34.0% 203

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp


AnswerL3. Overall Evaluations

L41 Overall evaluation of the Laboratory Instructor. 65.0% 1.5% 7.5% 4.5 26.0% 200


13-February-2017

Section: A1LC

Class Number: 15650

Dept. of General Engineering

EG 1003: Introduction to Engineering and Design

Response Rate: 208/298Primary Instructor: Georgi,Gunter W


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


A05 I have enhanced my ability to solve engineering problems. 2.5% 33.5% 3.4% 15.8% 4.0 44.8% 203

A06 I have enhanced my ability to analyze and interpret data appropriately. 4.0% 31.7% 5.4% 13.4% 4.0 45.5% 202

A26 I have enhanced my ability to plan and deliver oral presentations effectively 2.5% 55.2% 1.0% 3.0% 7.4% 4.3 31.0% 203

A27 I have enhanced my ability to plan and deliver written presentation effectively 3.9% 47.8% 3.9% 10.3% 4.2 34.0% 203

A35 I have enhanced my ability to design a system, component, or process to meet

desired needs

1.5% 39.2% 4.0% 13.1% 4.1 42.2% 199

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerR1. The Recitation Instructor

R06 The Recitation Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 1.5% 65.0% 0.5% 2.0% 7.4% 4.5 23.6% 203

R10 The Recitation Instructor was helpful and willing to answer questions outside of

class hours.

1.5% 60.1% 1.0% 2.0% 17.2% 4.3 18.2% 203

R11 The Recitation Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 2.5% 57.2% 0.5% 3.0% 9.5% 4.3 27.4% 201

R15 The Recitation Instructor provided helpful feedback on assessed class components


1.5% 55.9% 1.0% 5.0% 9.4% 4.3 27.2% 202

R19 My working skills and knowledge in this course were evaluated fairly. 1.5% 49.5% 1.5% 4.0% 12.9% 4.2 30.7% 202

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp


AnswerR2. Overall Evaluations

R41 Overall evaluation of the Recitation Instructor. 0.5% 61.7% 2.5% 11.4% 4.4 23.9% 201


13-February-2017

Section: I

Class Number: 15438


MN 7893: Production Science

Response Rate: 29/30Primary Instructor: Sathaye,Shashi


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To



Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 44.8% 3.4% 13.8% 3.4% 4.1 34.5% 29


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




41.4% 3.4% 6.9% 4.3 48.3% 29


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course

Q01 The course objectives were clearly stated. 48.3% 3.4% 13.8% 4.3 34.5% 29






Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 10.7% 35.7% 3.6% 28.6% 3.7 21.4% 28


in the profession.

10.7% 28.6% 3.6% 25.0% 3.6 32.1% 28



7.1% 25.0% 3.6% 17.9% 3.8 46.4% 28



3.6% 39.3% 10.7% 7.1% 4.0 39.3% 28

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp






13-February-2017

Section: INET

Class Number: 21204


MN 7893: Production Science

Response Rate: 4/7Primary Instructor: Sathaye,Shashi


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




Q11 The Lecture Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.3 4

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 3.0 25.0% 4

Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 2.5 4

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

No Yes Decline To

AnswerD. Course


Q21 The course was well organized. 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.3 4




Q40 Value was added to my education. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.8 4

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.3 4


in the profession.

50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.3 4



25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 2.5 4



25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.8 4

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


L20 The Instructor was effective in communicating or explaining subject matter online. 75.0% 25.0% 2.0 4

L21 The lecture Instructor encouraged and participated in discussions with students. 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.3 4


hours.

50.0% 25.0% 2.0 25.0% 4

L23 The amount of online communications with the instructor was effective. 75.0% 1.8 25.0% 4



50.0% 2.5 50.0% 4

L25 The online assignments (home, discussions, quizzes) were effective learning tools. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.5 25.0% 4

L26 The effort required to complete assignments is appropriate for the course. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 3.3 25.0% 4

L27 NYU ITS Technical Helpdesk was responsive and helpful. 50.0% 50.0% 3.0 4

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q41 Overall evaluation of the instructor. 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 2.3 4



13-February-2017

Section: I

Class Number: 24480


CE 8263: Construction Cost Estimating

Response Rate: 25/28Primary Instructor: Hossain,Faruque


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To





Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




4.0% 52.0% 16.0% 8.0% 4.0 20.0% 25


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course




Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 4.0% 60.0% 4.0% 12.0% 4.3 20.0% 25



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp






13-February-2017

Section: I

Class Number: 14699


MG 6093: ACCOUNTING & FINANCE

Response Rate: 22/37Primary Instructor: Apicella,Francis X


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To



Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 38.1% 9.5% 33.3% 3.9 19.0% 21


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




36.4% 9.1% 9.1% 4.1 45.5% 22


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course







Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 4.5% 31.8% 18.2% 13.6% 3.7 31.8% 22


in the profession.

4.5% 36.4% 18.2% 18.2% 3.7 22.7% 22



31.8% 4.5% 18.2% 13.6% 3.8 31.8% 22



31.8% 18.2% 13.6% 3.8 36.4% 22

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp






13-February-2017

Section: MOT3

Class Number: 21244


MG 6093: ACCOUNTING & FINANCE

Response Rate: 23/35Primary Instructor: Apicella,Francis X


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To



Q10 The Lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 65.2% 4.3% 4.3% 4.5 26.1% 23


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




65.2% 4.3% 4.3% 4.5 26.1% 23


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course







Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q27 I developed an interest in the subject. 43.5% 4.3% 13.0% 4.2 39.1% 23


in the profession.

52.2% 4.3% 8.7% 4.3 34.8% 23



43.5% 4.3% 8.7% 4.3 43.5% 23



52.2% 4.3% 4.3% 4.4 39.1% 23

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp






13-February-2017

Section: I

Class Number: 14728


TR 6223: Intelligent Transportation Systems and Their Applications

Response Rate: 22/26Primary Instructor: Patel,Raman


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To





Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




4.5% 40.9% 4.5% 9.1% 13.6% 4.0 27.3% 22


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To

AnswerD. Course


Q21 The course was well organized. 4.5% 27.3% 4.5% 18.2% 9.1% 3.7 36.4% 22





Avg Of

Results

#

Resp






13-February-2017

Section: A

Class Number: 15608

Dept. of Mathematics

MA 1002: The Art of Mathematics

Response Rate: 1/17Primary Instructor: Yang,Deane


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To



Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q06 The Lecture Instructor demonstrated mastery of course material. 100.0% 5.0 1

Q10 The lecture Instructor was helpful and answered questions outside of class. 100.0% 3.0 1

Q11 The Lecture Instructor provided an environment that was conducive to learning. 4.0 100.0% 1

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To




4.0 100.0% 1

Q19 My work in this course was evaluated fairly. 4.0 100.0% 1

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

No Yes Decline To

AnswerD. Course


Q21 The course was well organized. 4.0 100.0% 1

Q22 The course was intellectually stimulating. 4.0 100.0% 1

Q23 Textbook/lab manual/material provides quality support for course curriculum. 100.0% 3.0 1

Q37 The difficulty of the course was appropriate or as I expected. 4.0 100.0% 1


Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q27 I find the Reviews, Study Groups, and Workshops offered by Math as helpful

resources.

4.0 100.0% 1

Q28 I often used my professors office hours. 100.0% 3.0 1

Q29 I need more HW problems. 100.0% 3.0 1

Avg Of

Results

#

Resp

Strongly

Disagree

Moderately

Disagree

No

Opinion

Moderately

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Decline To


Q41 Overall evaluation of the instructor. 4.0 100.0% 1

Q43 Overall evaluation of the course. 4.0 100.0% 1


13-February-2017

Section: A

Class Number: 16098

Dept. of Technology, Culture & Society

STS 2004: Science, Technology and Society

Response Rate: 19/25Primary Instructor: Bain,Jonathan


#

Resp

No Yes Decline To


Q02 Grading policy was stated in detail

Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Class Number ......Class Number: 16007 Dept. of...

Documents

Transcript of Dept. of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Class Number ......Class Number: 16007 Dept. of...