Defamation on Facebook and Twitter
-
Upload
australian-human-rights -
Category
Documents
-
view
232 -
download
15
Transcript of Defamation on Facebook and Twitter
EXPOSED 2014
Defamation on Facebook and Twitter
Internet defamation of character is as easy to perpetuate as a blog post,
Facebook update, rating submission, or a forum comment. Your online
reputation is measured by the websites return as Google search results. Do you
know what people are saying and writing about you?
Defamation on Facebook and Twitter is becoming more and more common
every single day because it’s so easy to post a comment or an item onto your
Facebook wall or onto your Twitter account. And because emotions run high
sometimes, that spontaneous compulsion in you to say something really mean
about someone else or to make something up about someone else can be very
real, and it can result in big legal problems under defamation of character law.
Now, because it’s written defamation, then it’s typically going to be libel as
opposed to slander. Libel on the Internet is when someone actually writes
something that is classified as defamatory under defamation law. My name is
defamation attorney Enrico Schaefer. My law firm specializes in Internet and
online defamation of character cases. Today we’re talking a little bit about
Facebook defamation and Twitter defamation.
The first thing that you need to know if you have been accused of defamation
on Facebook or whether or not you believe you are a victim of defamation on
Facebook or Twitter is that these types of issues tend to be much easier to
resolve than when the defamation goes up on a website like Rip Off Reports,
Yelp, Google Places, or some of the other ratings websites that are out there like
Avvo, etc.
So, the good news is that for both the person who believes they’re the victim of
defamation of character and for the person who posted the statement, which
allegedly is a false statement of fact, which is subjecting you to a threat letter
for defamation, is that these posts can be removed. At least as long as they’re
not shared onto someone else’s wall already. So, unlike many situations that an
Internet lawyer will get involved in, this was one that has a remedy that can be
typically executed by both parties to the defamation.
So here’s the way it would typically work. Let’s say I’m an attorney
representing the person who believes they’re a victim of defamation of
character as a result of someone else posting something on Facebook, on their
wall, which is a statement of fact which diminishes their reputation and which is
factually untrue. What I’m going to do is I’m going to analyze the post. Make
sure that I can find a false statement of fact. Call out the opinions that might be
EXPOSED 2014
in there that are first amendment protected, and see if there’s a false statement
of fact in the post that can be proven as true or false.
Assuming that I, as the plaintiff’s attorney, get through that hurdle, the next
thing I’m going to do is take a look at whether or not a threat letter is
appropriate to the person, the account holder on Facebook or Twitter who
actually posted that defamatory statement. I might contact them through
Facebook inbox, or I might contact them as a result of other information I’m
able to pull off of the Internet about who they are, where they’re located, and
who they work for.
I’m typically going to try and send that defamation of character threat letter in
as many different directions as I can to that person. If I am representing the
person who’s been accused of defamation of character on Facebook or Twitter,
what I’m going to do is the same thing. I’m going to see if the statement
qualifies as opinion or whether or not there’s potential liability for defamation
of character as a result of what is said there.
In either instance, the goal is to potentially try and resolve the defamation issue,
and in that instance, if I’m representing the plaintiff, we’re going to demand that
the post be removed. We might demand a retraction. We might demand any
number of different things to go along with that.
If I believe that there’s liability and I’m representing the defendant in a
defamation of character on the Internet issue, such as on Facebook or Twitter,
then what I’m going to do is I’m going to advise the client to potentially remove
the post, assuming that we can get a release of liability from the person who’s
making the accusation of Facebook libel.
So those are the ways that we’re going to typically handle these issues. Twitter
is a little bit more challenging because of how easy it is for people to share
tweets. So assuming that I can remove the tweet from my own account page, I
may not be able to remove the tweet from other people’s account page. That
might require some additional work, asking people to remove the post, etc.
The good news is that in many instances there’s not a lot of sharing going on,
on Twitter. It’s the unusual tweet that actually results in someone reposting a
tweet. So, these things can spread like viruses if in fact they’re popular, the
person who’s being defamed is a famous person or someone who is known
within an industry.
My name is defamation of character attorney Enrico Schaefer
EXPOSED 2014
How to Prove Defamation of Character on the Internet….
Defamation of character claims can be challenging, but here’s what you need to
know about what you have to prove in order to establish internet defamation or
defamation of character on the web. In order to show that there is a defamation
that has occurred, you have to prove that there was a false statement of fact
about you or your business. Now, what is a false statement of fact? A false
statement of fact in a defamation claim, whether it’s slander or libel is a
statement that can be proven either true or false, or is false by implication.
Internet defamation of character is as easy to perpetuate as a blog post,
Facebook update, rating submission, or a forum comment. Your online
reputation is measured by the websites return as Google search results. Do you know what people are saying and writing about you?
How to prove defamation of character on the internet? It’s a common question
that clients who contact us have. When you are the subject of a defamatory,
false, disparaging statement that gets posted on the internet let’s face it. It really
hurts. It’s personal, because you are being attacked personally, your reputation
is being attacked personally and being posted on the World Wide Web.
The internet is a place where anyone can post anything about anyone, and it
doesn’t matter to the poster oftentimes whether or not what they are saying is
true. They in fact want to hurt you. My name is Defamation Law Attorney
Enrico Schaefer, and today we’re going to be talking a little bit about, how do
you prove defamation of character when that defamation is posted on the
internet?
Now, defamation is a very complex area of law and there are a variety of
elements in a defamation claim that you would have to prove if you were ever
to file a defamation case in court. So, before you sue someone for defamation of
character as a result of an internet posting, you need to understand where the
lines are. This could be a very difficult issue because, again, if it’s you and what
is said on the internet really makes you look bad, your initial inclination is
going to be to want to file a lawsuit for defamation.
Defamation of character claims can be challenging, but here’s what you need to
know about what you have to prove in order to establish internet defamation or
defamation of character on the web. In order to show that there is a defamation
that has occurred, you have to prove that there was a false statement of fact
about you or your business. Now, what is a false statement of fact? A false
statement of fact in a defamation claim, whether it’s slander or libel is a
statement that can be proven either true or false, or is false by implication.
EXPOSED 2014
So, let’s take an easy example. If I say that someone was driving in a white car
and that I saw them on such and such a date at such and such a time, driving in a
white car, that’s something that theoretically can be proven as true or false.
Either you were or were not driving at that time in a white car. So that is an easy
statement of fact. If I say that you were riding in an ugly car on such and such a
date at such and such a time that is not a statement of fact. At least as it relates
to whether or not the car was an ugly car.
The statement that a car was ugly is in fact a statement of opinion and is
protected as First Amendment freedom of speech. Now, if you say that it was an
ugly car and it was on such and such a date and such and such a time and the car
was ugly, well it may be false in the sense that you weren’t driving that car on
that date and time. But that wouldn’t defamatory either because it doesn’t
disparage you. The statement that you were in an ugly car on a certain date and
time and you weren’t driving that car on that date and time, the false part of that
statement, the date and time, may be a problem in that it is provable as false.
But it doesn’t disparage you.
So, not only do you have to establish for a defamation of character claim that a
false statement of fact was made about you. But you also have to establish that
that is a defamatory statement. It’s one which disparages your reputation. It’s
one which an average person would think less of you if they read it or heard it
or saw it.
So, these are the things that are really important. Now, ultimately there’s a very
complex issue concerning defamation damages and how you go about
establishing defamation damages. We’re not going to talk too much about the
defamation damages issue today. Consult a defamation law attorney if you want
to understand better whether or not you’re going to be able to establish damages
against a person who has posted a false statement against you on the internet.
That is a very complicated issue. In certain instances the defamatory statement
may be presumed to create damages to you and be characterized as defamation
per say. That is a subject for a different day. It’s far more complex.
What you need to understand first, here, is whether or not you have a claim
that’s even in the ballpark so that you can either send a defamation threat letter
asking them to take down the defamatory content, or to ask the website host to
take down the defamatory content. That is an easier issue to get your brain
around. Just because it hurts doesn’t mean it’s defamation of character. It has to
be a false statement of fact which diminishes your reputation.
So, this is very, very important. Defamation law is always very fact specific.
That means that each case is different. One of the things that our defamation
EXPOSED 2014
attorneys will do is an initial assessment so that they can understand better the
facts and give you advice as to whether or not you have any leverage under
defamation law, because in fact it does qualify potentially as defamation under
the statute that applies in your particular state.
So, how to prove defamation of character? Very common question. The first
things that you as a client need to be understand are the elements, the base
elements that you’re going to have to be able to establish. If in fact you cannot
establish that a false statement of fact was made about you, or that even if it’s a
false statement of fact that it doesn’t diminish your reputation, you need to
know that right out of the gate, because they you’re going to have very few
options in terms of moving forward.
That doesn’t say that you can’t have the content removed. A good defamation
attorney will give you some strategies to at least give you a chance to have the
information removed. But you need to be able to establish the elements of
defamation in order to really get the leverage that you need.
Now, as a defamation attorney, one of the early issues that we will always take
a look at is the statute of limitations for defamation. If the information has been
posted on the internet for a long time and you’re just finding it, there may be a
statute of limitation issue where you can no longer establish the defamation
claim because you’ve waited too long.
If it’s a defamatory statement that you are just discovering after many years,
there may be a tolling of the statute of limitations which will help you out there.
The number one lesson that any good defamation law attorney will tell you is
that you need to make sure that you act within the time frames allowed under
your state defamation law, typically one to two years from the time that the
defamatory information is posted on the internet.
Making and Using a Fake Profile…..
It is so easy to sit down at your computer, iPad, or smart phone and vent your
aggression, anger, or frustration by posting negative or false comments about
someone else. In order to protect yourself, you create a special gmail address
containing a name that is not in any way related to you. You use this gmail
address to create an account on Yelp, ComplaintsBoard.com,
RipOffReport.com, Google, or some other platform. You then set to work,
EXPOSED 2014
flaming the person who is the target of your anger and frustration with all kinds
of statements that you know will hurt their reputation.
You think you are very clever. You smile knowing how smart you really are.
You feel anonymous and powerful. But guess what? An internet defamation
attorney such as myself can find out who you are. Chances are, you have left
digital clues as to your identity in the defamatory post itself or related to the
account you created so cleverly to remain anonymous. But even if a good
internet and technology attorney cannot quickly identify you from your digital
trail, I could always send a subpoena to the platform on which you posted.
Chances are, they have your IP address which will tell me what internet
connection you used in order to post anonymously. From there, I can subpoena
the internet service provider to find out who owns the account through which
you accessed the internet. Assuming that doesn’t reveal your identity, I can
always identify the computer used on the account to access the internet and
trace it directly to you. You are no longer anonymous.
Sometimes, it is important to take a step back and take a big breath of fresh air.
Do not let your anger and frustration compel you to do something you will later
regret. While posting false and defamatory information is as easy as starting up
your laptop, or turning on your smartphone, the damage that can be done to both
you and the target of your frustration can last a lifetime. Even the best computer
hackers in the world can often be traced and identified. Chances are, you don’t
qualify as a world class hacker. I will find you. You will have to answer for the
comments that were made online.
Doctor / Proffesional defamation is one of the most common types of
defamation on the internet that we see. Our web defamation, slander, and
libel attorneys work with a variety of hospitals, doctors, physicians, and
nonprofit organizations who are battling to protect their reputations online.
Doctor defamation tends to be more common because of the emotional
component of physician/patient relationships and the care being provided. The
stakes are high for the patient. That emotional component often translates into
EXPOSED 2014
false or negative commentary posted on websites, blogs, facebook, twitter,
and other social media forums where defamation is as easy to post as hitting
“enter” on your computer keyboard.
There are a variety of different strategies that a good, experienced internet libel
attorney will consider before responding to a false statement posted about a
doctor, hospital, or physician. Like many areas of internet law, handling internet
defamation cases requires tremendous skill and experience. There is far more to
consider than just the legal elements of a defamation, libel, or slander legal
claim. Perhaps the most important factor is who you are dealing with.
Understanding who posted the false statements about you is as important as
any other factor. Is the person who posted about you anonymous? Do you know
who the person is who posted the false statements about you on the internet? Is
the person who posted negative comments or ratings a former or current
patient? Do you think it is possible that one of your competitors is pretending to
be a current or former patient?
Doctor defamation could cause serious harm to your business and reputation.
You need to understand your options, legal claims, and get educated about the
important variables in handling a doctor defamation case.
http://www.traverselegal.com/internet-defamation/category/defamation/