Deborah Arnold - EMMA webinar: Capturing and delivering effective video as part of your MOOC

25

Transcript of Deborah Arnold - EMMA webinar: Capturing and delivering effective video as part of your MOOC

a panorama of video genres for MOOCs

Deborah ArnoldDepartment Manager, AIDE-numérique

Centre for Information Systems and Digital PracticeUniversité de Bourgogne

@DebJArnold

The ugly?

The bad?

The good?

YouTube genres for teaching and learning(Donald Clark)http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/youtube-another-moop-

massive-open.html

• Khan blackboard and coloured chalk – simple but effective, learner’s mind not cluttered with seeing Khan – it’s the semantic content that matters, not talking heads.

• Thrun’s hand and whiteboard – again not Thrun’s head that matters but seeing worked problems and solutions.

• RSA animations – clever animations that end up as a single infographic.

• TED talks – shows how lectures should be – passionate experts, no notes, no reading, little PowerPoint and short.

• Software demos – just show me the steps one by one.

• Physical demos – point the camera at the engine, radiator or whatever I need to fix and show me how to do it, with commentary. I just take my tablet to the place I need it.

• Sports coaching – wayward tennis serve? Watch an expert coach you in slow motion.

Donald Clark (again) on HCI MOOC video

http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/mooc-on-human-computer-interaction-7.html

• Small screen, low retention

• Too much talking head

• Cognitive dissonance (text and video at the same time – the death of rich media?)

• Paucity of images (describing schemas, techniques or procedures without images)

• Presentation style (important for maintaining attention)

• Poor editing (negative effect on retention)

How MOOC Video Production Affects Student Engagementhttps://www.edx.org/blog/how-mooc-video-production-affects#.VBMapU0cSu0

How MOOC Video Production Affects Student Engagement

https://www.edx.org/blog/how-mooc-video-production-affects#.VBMapU0cSu0

1. Shorter videos are much more engaging. Engagement drops sharply after 6 minutes.

2. Videos that intersperse an instructor’s talking head with PowerPoint slides are more engaging than showing only slides.

3. Videos produced with a more personal feel could be more engaging than high-fidelity studio recordings.

4. Khan-style tablet drawing tutorials are more engaging than PowerPoint slides or code screencasts.

5. Even high-quality prerecorded classroom lectures are not as engaging when chopped up into short segments for a MOOC.

6. Videos where instructors speak fairly fast and with high enthusiasm are more engaging.

7. Students engage differently with lecture and tutorial videos.

3 MOOC platformsFUN, EMMA, ECO

FUN: France Université Numérique

https://www.france-universite-numerique-mooc.fr

EMMA: European Multiple MOOC Aggregator#EUMoocs

http://platform.europeanmoocs.eu

ECO: Elearning Communication Open Data#ECOlearning

https://hub5.ecolearning.eu/

Creating a MOOC from A to Z (FUN)

Video tutorials on video for MOOCs

Rémi Sharrock, Mines-Télécom

Creating a MOOC from A to Z

Rémi’s office / studio

Creating a MOOC from A to Z

Filming writing

Creating a MOOC from A to Z

Filming an experiment and writing the explanation

Creating a MOOC from A to Z

Filming writing on whiteboard

Project management (2nd iteration)

Rich media

Project management (3rd iteration)

Spot de difference?!

General and Social Pedagogy (EMMA)

University of Naples Federico II

General and Social Pedagogy (EMMA)

University of Naples Federico II

(automatic transcription and translation by Universitat Politecnica de Valencia)

Ma pédagogie à la sauce web / Teaching & learning the

web 2.0 way (ECO)

Stop motion animation

“Causerie” (informal chat)

Christophe Batier & Marcel Lebrun

YouTube

Du Manager au Leader (FUN)

?

Thank youDeborah [email protected]

@DebJArnold

Thank you!