China Debate Education Network Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate
Debate
Transcript of Debate
![Page 1: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
DEBATE
![Page 2: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
DEBATE• Formal type of argumentation
• Intelligent exchange of points between the affirmative and negative sides
![Page 3: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
TYPES OF DEBATEThere are four types of debates that are most
commonly used. These are as follows:
Lincoln- Douglas- is a kind of debate where there is only one speaker in the side of the affirmative as well as in the side of the affirmative side opens the debate then followed by the negative speaker.
![Page 4: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
THE REBUTTAL DEBATE
-is a kind of debate where each team from the affirmative and the negative side is composed of about two or three members. As the debate starts, the affirmative speaker opens the constructive speech and the negative speaker starts the rebuttal. Every speaker is allowed to deliver a rebuttal speech. The debate is closed with the affirmative side delivering the last rebuttal.
![Page 5: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ONE REBUTTAL TYPE OF DEBATE
is considered as a modified form of the Lincoln-Douglas type of debate. However in this type of debate, there are about two to three members in both the affirmative and the negative side. In this debate, all of the speakers have a chance to refute the argument of the opponent with the exception of the first affirmative speaker who is given the opportunity to close the debate in his or her rebuttal speech.
![Page 6: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
OREGON-OXFORD DEBATE tradit ional debate format used in elementary,
governors debate, house debate rules, parliamentary debate rules, high school debate, youtube debate, presidential debate, colleges and all over the country.
There are 2 sides in this format : the Aff irmative and the Negative. The Aff irmative proves the validity of the issue or topic called the Proposit ion while the Negative disproves it . Each team has two speakers and one scribe. A Debate Moderator enforces the rules to ensure the debate’s smooth conduct.
![Page 7: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
FLOW OF OREGON OFXORD DEBATE
THREE SPEAKERS FROM EACH SIDE
1st speaker affirmative side constructive speech 5 minutes1st speaker negative side interpolation 3 minutes1st speaker negative side constructive speech 5 minutes1st speaker affirmative side interpolation 3 minutes2nd speaker affirmative side constructive speech 5 minutes2nd speaker negative side interpolation 3 minutes2nd speaker negative side constructive speech 5 minute2nd speaker affirmative side interpolation 3 minutes3rd speaker affirmative side constructive speech 5 minutes3rd speaker negative side interpolation 3 minutes3rd speaker negative side constructive speech 5 minutes3rd speaker affirmative side interpolation 3 minute5-minute breakspeaker negative side rebuttal 5 minutesspeaker affirmative side rebuttal 5 minutes
![Page 8: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
In debate
Proposition
![Page 9: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Proposition
Topic or issue that is
argued upon
![Page 10: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
In exploring
Do some ORGANIZED research!
Utilize the library-it’s the first source
Do some interview
s
Take down notes!
Refer to the web
![Page 11: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Parts of an argument
![Page 12: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
You should arouse the attention of your audience.
REMEMBER!
![Page 14: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Make them see that the topic is
important.
How?
![Page 15: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Show them that the topic is
timely.
How?
![Page 16: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Preserve a favorable attitude.
How?
![Page 17: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Second aim of intro is to
explain the proposition.
REMEMBER!
![Page 18: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Define all important
words. (1st A)
How?
![Page 19: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Set the parameters/ limit of the
debate (1st A)
How?
![Page 20: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The whole idea must be clearly
explained.
How?
![Page 21: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Present a short but lively
history of the topic.
How?
![Page 22: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Third aim of intro is to state the ISSUES.
REMEMBER!
![Page 23: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
ISSUES are the questions that
when answered, may destroy a
side.
UNDERSTAND
![Page 24: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
ISSUES are the questions that
when answered, may destroy a
side.
UNDERSTAND
![Page 25: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
TEST FOR ISSUES Resolved that the K+12 be
implemented in the Philippine Educational System . (PROPOSITION)• How would the proposition
affect the Philippine Educational System? The
students?
![Page 26: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
TEST FOR ISSUES Resolved that the K+12 be
implemented in the Philippine Educational System. (PROPOSITION)
• Is there really a need to implement
the proposition?
![Page 27: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Parts of an argument
![Page 28: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
OPPOSING SIDES
![Page 29: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
AFFIRMATIVE
![Page 30: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
negative
![Page 31: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Aspects of the debatE(+)
![Page 32: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Aspects of the debatE(-)
![Page 33: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
NECESSITY
![Page 34: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
beneficiality
![Page 35: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
practicability
![Page 36: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
PARTS of the debatE(+)
![Page 37: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Constructive speech presentation of
each team member’s
arguments and evidence for each aspect of the case
![Page 38: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Interpellation The opportunity for
the opposing debater to ask
questions regarding the speech of the
speaker
![Page 39: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Rebuttal The summary and
defense of each team’s arguments
and evidence, to be delivered by the
team captain
![Page 40: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Speaker roles 1A speaker-
NECESSITY 1N speaker-NON
NECESSITY
![Page 41: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Speaker roles 2A speaker-
BENEFICIALITY 2N speaker-NON
BENEFICIALITY
![Page 42: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Speaker roles 3A speaker-
PRACTICABILITY 3N speaker-NON
PRACTICABILITY
![Page 43: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
FALLACIES IN DEBATE
Fallacy refers to an incorrect argument which results in invalid or unsound statements.
There are different kinds of fallacies but below are the commonly encountered fallacies in any argumentation.
![Page 44: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
FALLACIES IN DEBATE
AD HOMINEM- is the fallacy committed when one party attacks the character of the other party for the purpose of making the argument of that other party weak.
EXAMPLE: I cannot accept the argument of Capt. Juan Dela Cruz to implement zero alcohol policy on board since he himself is an alcoholic.
![Page 45: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
POST HOC Is the fallacy committed when one party
considers the fact or situation that occurred before as the cause of the occurence of another situation without significant basis.
EXAMPLE: I believe that this technical problem occured due to our newly-embarked master. I am certain, for this problem only occured two days after his embarkmention. He is probably a bad luck.
![Page 46: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
AD POPULUM is the fallacy committed when one
party attempts to win an argument by citing that most or a lot of people believe in a certain position, as in bandwagon fallacy.
EXAMPLE: Everybody is drinking on board. I should join them.
![Page 47: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
AD MISERICORDIAM
• i s the fa l lacy commit ted when one party use s an argument that appeal s to pi ty or re la ted emot ion in order to convince and thus in f luence the other party to give into wil l o f the former.
![Page 48: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
AD MISERICORDIAM EXAMPLE: I believe we should give him a chance. I know the problem occurred out of negligence. Yet we need to consider his goodness. He has been with us for several months and he has been so good to us. He has been helpful to us somehow. What wil l happen to him if we wil l recommend him for repatriation? Anyway, nobody was hurt in that incident.
![Page 49: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
AD BACULUM• is the fallacy committed when one
party uses threat to invoke fear in the other party and thus persuade the other party to accept the will of the former. However, the threatening argument used is not directly related to the main issue at hand.
![Page 50: Debate](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042817/55a618b31a28abec728b4667/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
AD BACULUM • I know I violated our code of
ethics. Yet you need to give me a chance. Otherwise, I will inform the company about your anomalous activities here onboard.