Cisco Data Center Network Sales Solutions David Hettrick Cisco Technology Solutions Engineer.
David Parocki, Director of Sales, Arvia Technology
-
Upload
daniel-rankine -
Category
Environment
-
view
192 -
download
2
Transcript of David Parocki, Director of Sales, Arvia Technology
1
Advanced Organics Removal for Water & Wastewater Treatment
29th March 2017
UK Onshore Oil & Gas
Birmingham City Centre
Introduction
2
By 2030 demand is going to outstrip supply by 60% - significant pressure to change
Source: McKinsey & Company: 2030 Water Resources Group
Arvia Technology
3
• Arvia’s technology is a Paradigm shift – cost effectively
• Reducing fresh water contamination - improving discharged water
quality
• Increase the percentage of water that can be reused
• Allowing historically un usable source water to be used
NyexTM – An Adsorbent & Electrode
Adsorption
Energy efficient, trace level, organics destruction with no secondary
waste
Electrochemical Oxidation
• Concentrates organics on a surface
• Achieves low discharge consents
• Destruction of recalcitrant organics
• Chemical free, onsite operation @
room temperature and pressure
5
Arvia Organics Destruction Cell (ODC™)
Arvia Organics Destruction Cell (ODC™)
5
(video of the process http://bit.ly/1QMAc5A)
ODC™ Benefits
• Energy used proportional to the organics destroyed
• The lower the concentration of organics the more cost-effective!
• No toxic by-products or sludge
• Chemical free and environmentally friendly
• Modular and scalable design
• Low maintenance and minimal operator input
7
ODC™ Building Blocks
Single Module ODC 22-100
Flow (Up to) 13,200 L/hrs
Max Inlet COD 2,000 ppm
Typical Operating Current 50 Amps
Expected Operating Voltage 35 - 75 Volts
Foot print 1.2 m x 0.7 m
8
Market Positioning
9
10
100
1000
10000
0 25 50 75 100
CO
D (
pp
m)
Flow rate (m3/hr)
Biological
Incineration
O3 + H2O2
Wet Air Oxidation
Wet Air Oxidation & Biological
Fentons & Biological
10
Case Studies
Refinery wastewater
• Treatment of oil refinery waste
• Removing PTA Purified Terephthalic Acid to meet stringent regulations
• Effluent required treatment of 20ppm COD
• Lab trial showed treatment result achieved
COD in (ppm) COD out (ppm)
11
Coal to Gas Wastewater
• Biological wastewater treatment does not achieve permit levels
• COD polishing target of 80 mg/l achieved
• 40% COD removed with energy consumption 20.4 kWh/kg COD
• Scope to improve this value towards theoretical maxima of 8 kWh/kg COD optimising cell
configuration
12
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
0 2 4 6 8 10
CO
D (
pp
m)
Time (hrs)
Preferential Treatment of Chemicals
0
0.0002
0.0004
0.0006
0.0008
0.001
0.0012
0.0014
Sample 1Initial
Sample 2 24 hr Sample 3 48 hr Sample 4 72 hr Sample 5 96 hr
Aq
. Co
nc.
mg/
kg
HxCDDs
HxCDFs
PeCDDs
PeCDFs
TCDDs
TCDFs
RCRA Limit
Dioxin and Furans Removal: Selective treatment delivered
despite high background organics (77,500 ppm COD)
12
Water Reuse
• Water from Singapore utility treating Reverse Osmosis reject
• Total Organic Concentration (TOC) in reject water was still high at 23.7 mg/l
• Treatment target of below 5 mg/l of TOC was achieved
14
Summary
15
• Arvia’s system combines the advantages of adsorption and electrochemical oxidation
in a single system
• Delivers removal of trace level organics; including COD, micro-pollutants and colour
• Helps achieve regulatory targets and water reuse
• Achieves this with no secondary waste or chemicals used
17
Additional Case Studies
Aqueous Hospital Waste
Treatment Issue:
• Aqueous wastes generated by hospital activities were
being high temperature incinerated (HTI)
• Low calorific value of the waste meant that it was a poor
candidate for incineration
• An alternative disposal method was necessary
Treatment & Performance Summary:
• The Arvia ODC delivered required COD removal
• Treatment was shown to require 8-12 kWh/kg COD
• Treatment cost varied according to the organic content
of the waste
• ROI in less than 12 months
18
Description COD (mg/L)
CODRemoval
Waste 1 882 ≥ 95%
Waste 2 7150 ≥ 95%
Waste 3 26000 ≥ 95%
Colour Removal from Beverages
What happens to the colour of Coca Cola when treated in Arvia’s lab system?
19
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Pt-
Co
Time (hours)
Coca Cola treatability trial (colour)
Removal of Dye Penetrant
• Heat exchange manufacturer currently trucking batches of
wastewater
• Arvia has provided on-site wastewater treatment eliminating
trucking costs
• Arvia provides a return of investment within two years
20
Feed from secondary clarifier
• Colour Reduction over 80%
• COD Reduction 20%
• Energy for regeneration 0.5 kWh/m3
• Treatment of warm wastewater (approximately 30oC)
for re-use, reducing water heating requirements by
nearly 25oC (min 29 kWh/m3)
Pulp & Paper Lignin
21
Micro-pollutants in Wastewater
• Pilot plant as part of UK Chemical Investigation Programme
• Measuring for removal of EU Water Framework Directive priority
substances
• Key operational parameters:
o Treatment rate: 600 l/hr
o Energy consumption: 0.6 kWh/m3
o Treatment target: parts per billion level
22
Micro-pollutantLab System
Removal efficiency (%)Pilot plant
Removal efficiency (%)
Diclofenac 97 92
Ibuprofen 88 81
Ciprofloxacin 96 84
EE2 100 96
Benzo(a)pyrene 100 92
Tributyltin 96 72
Carbamazepine 97 60
Triclosan 95 68
*Un-optimised pilot plant
Micro-pollutants in Drinking Water
• Metaldehyde is a persistent pesticide used extensively in rape seed farming and avoids
treatment through conventional water treatment facilities
• EU drinking water standards are 0.1 ppb
• 200+ plants fail EU standards in UK
• Trial results showed 96% removal of metaldehyde from water (Pilot plant Feb 2017)
23
• Treatment of upland surface waters for 5-200
population centres
• Colour removal ~92%
• The treated water samples were visibly clear
Small Rural Water Treatment
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Pt-
Co
Time (hours)
Pt-Co
24
• Treatment of cleaning wash water from a dry manufacturing process
• COD in raw feed was 510 mg/l and achieved discharge consent of 40mg/l
• Colour initially 664 Pt-Co and reduced to 30 Pt-Co
Tea Wash Water
25