Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites
Transcript of Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites
![Page 1: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf
Galactic SatellitesBy Andrey Kravtsov
Presented By Curtis McCully
Thursday, October 8, 2009
![Page 2: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline• Introduction
• CDM Simulations vs Observations
• Quantifying the Substructure Problem
• Dark Satellites
• Luminous Satellites
• Possible Solutions
• New Cosmological Model
• Galaxy Formation Suppression
Thursday, October 8, 2009
![Page 3: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Fig. 1— Formation of a Milky Way-sized dark matter halo in a cosmological simulation of flat ΛCDM cosmology(Ωm = 1 − ΩΛ = 0.3, h = 0.7, σ8 = 0.9). The panels show an evolutionary sequence at nine redshifts (from left toright and from top to bottom) focusing on the most massive progenitor of the main halo at each epoch (redshift ofeach epoch is shown in the left upper corner). The rendering shows the dark matter particles with intensity indicatingthe local matter density on a logarithmic stretch. The build-up of the halo proceeds through a series of spectacularmergers, particularly frequent in the early stages of evolution. Many of the merging clumps survive until the presentepoch ( = 0) in the form of ”substructure”. The size of the region shown is about 3 comoving Mpc at = 15,monotonically zooming in to a scale of ≈ 1 comoving Mpc across at = 0.
is a visual manifestation of approximate self-similarity of CDM halos of different mass. Ifwe would compare similar images of distribu-tion of luminous matter around galaxies andclusters, the difference would be striking.
The manifestly different observed satellite
populations around galaxies of different lu-minosities and expected approximately self-similar populations of satellite subhalos aroundhalos of different mass is known as the sub-structure problem. [19, 20, 16]. In the case ofthe best studied satellite systems of the Milky
2
Thursday, October 8, 2009
![Page 4: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Via Lactea Movies can be found at the following url
• http://www.ucolick.org/%7Ediemand/vl/movies.html
Thursday, October 8, 2009
![Page 5: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Luminous Satellite Galaxies
Thursday, October 8, 2009
![Page 6: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Circular Velocity and Slopes
m0.6
Thursday, October 8, 2009
![Page 7: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Defining the “Substructure Problem”
“The substructure problem can be stated as the discrepancy in the slopes of the circular velocity and mass functions inferred for observed satellites of the Milky Way and the slopes of these functions predicted for dark matter subhalos in the MW-sized host halos formed in the concordance cosmology”
m0.6
ΛCDM
Thursday, October 8, 2009
![Page 8: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Different Cosmology
• Suppressing density fluctuations
• Warm Dark Matter
Thursday, October 8, 2009
![Page 9: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Galaxy Formation Subhalo Suppression
• Gas photoevaporated after reionization
• Supernovae Feedback
• Satellites could be in larger halos
Thursday, October 8, 2009
![Page 10: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Conclusions
• Models and Observation do not agree
• Satellites could be mostly dark
• If satellites are dark, need low star forming efficiency
• Mass-dependent suppression mechanism
Thursday, October 8, 2009
![Page 11: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Luminous Satellite Models
• Threshold Galaxy Formation
• Selective Galaxy Formation
Thursday, October 8, 2009
![Page 12: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Subhalo Populations
Vmax = max(
Gm(<r)r
)1/2
m(< r) = 4π∫
ρ(r)r2dr
Thursday, October 8, 2009
![Page 13: Dark Matter Substructure and Dwarf Galactic Satellites](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022013005/61cd66e4c34a6368434e520a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Luminous Satellites (Cont.)
Thursday, October 8, 2009