Comparing UV Spot Repairs for Sewer Pipes to Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) Methods
Cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) Rehabilitation of AC water mains
Transcript of Cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) Rehabilitation of AC water mains
Cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) Rehabilitation of AC water mains
James GardnerCRC-P Program Manager on behalf of SEW
15 October 2019
CRC-P Melbourne Industry Update
This presentation is for individual reference only, do not reproduce materials or publish without permission from WSAA.
Why Lining Technology?
- High risk and old water mains – pipe cracking not possible
- Increasing risk to 3rd party assets and social impacts
- 1,600 kms of AC pipes (20% of network).
- $10M p.a. $40M p.a. by 2040
- Pipe Cracking - HDD on new alignment
- Abandoned AC = legacy issue
- Renewal alternatives to combat legacy and increasing cost:
• use existing assets• lower cost rehab
methods
Why CIPP?
Drivers for South East Water- New structural pipe (min
50 year life)- Minimise disruption to
customers - Suitable for 100 mm and
150 mm AC mains- Easy to maintain- Minimise potential
exposure of asbestos- Reduce future liability- Reduced cost of
rehabilitation
Field Trials
CIPP field trial – Springvale, VictoriaInitial small scale test using both products.First installation in AC pipe in Australia.Used abandoned AC mains.DN100 and DN150.Field tests ensure realistic installation environment.Approx. 200 m lined –32 samples tested.
Lessons LearnedKey Lessons
- AC main size (ID) investigation required as quite variable.
- QA records and procedures required improvement (though this is a trial so this was expected).
- Efficiencies need improving to make it cost competitive - It is much more costly to renew mains in America and
Europe where they must be deeper to get under the frost zone, making lining more attractive.
- SEW < $400 p/m for HDD.
Installed Products
Live Trial Site – Seebeck Road, Rowville Vic
• Site renewed with HDPE in 2017
• 2km of abandoned AC mains- 1km per product• Offline replacement minimises
customer disruption• Lined main to be live with
network through cross connections
Trial Aims: - Productivity/Economics- Maintainability- Sample Testing- Ongoing Testbed
Product 1Product 2
ChallengesSafety - Site layout and placement of equipment
- Depth and size of AC Mains
- Excavation at power poles for tee’s and fittings
Delays- Varying ID and OD of AC mains
- Equipment faults and failures- Compressors, refrigeration trucks, wet
out equipment.
- Equipment availability - 100mm camera/cutter required to be
returned to US for electrical modifications.
- Crew’s first time doing lengthy job
- Developing new documentation (ITP’s, reporting, data collection)
- Large differential ID at burst repairs is difficult for the camera equipment to pass. AC ID ≈86mm, PVC repair ID ≈109mm
ChallengesCommunity - Customer interactions -
being disturbed twice (renewal of mains then trial works).
Quality Assurance- Products require AS4020
certification (contact with dinking water) and water quality testing for initial installations important for verification.
Successes Wins- Achieved a double shot
(two lines in one day) - Lined around a 150mm
90° bend - Created a baseline for
QA documentation for CIPP delivery
- Crews are becoming more accustomed to roles and responsibilities
- Have been able to line through burst repairs successfully Successful lining around a 90° bend
Lessons Learned- QA and Safety documentation is key
- ITP for pressure testing - Resin quantities- Record of service plugging - CCTV- Relevant SWMS and SOP’s for
task
- Involve all relevant areas of business
- Expect teething issues with equipment and crews
- Record keeping of delays, positives, customer interactions, program, etc.
- Manufacturer expertise very handy to have on site
- Program flexibility- One equipment issue can see the
program change completely, can the contractor accommodate this change?
Overall SEW are happy with the progress of the project.
-Complete liner installation in all areas (late-2019 to early-2020).
-Following completion of works:-Open relined pipes to network.-Undertake additional testing, e.g. a burst repair on the liner.
Next Steps
-CT scans of AC pipe showed generally even internal corrosion and quite different rates of external corrosion.
-When looking at the bonding of the liner to the host pipe consideration was given that the bond not be too strong – this is to prevent a broken back failure in the host pipe applying a point load to the liner.
-Service connections-Ferrule (sticks out into the pipeline), these can be seen, plugged before lining and cut out after lining.-Tapping bands – insert a plug with a light on it before lining, then after lining send down the robotic cutter and it can find the light to cut out the connection.-Robot cutters are currently difficult to use in DN100 AC pipes as after lining the diameter can get as small as 77mm.
Other interesting things