Silicon Oxide Films Containing Amorphous or Crystalline Silicon
Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells Future Directions …web.stanford.edu/group/cui_group/BAPVC/BAPVC...
Transcript of Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells Future Directions …web.stanford.edu/group/cui_group/BAPVC/BAPVC...
Stuart Bowden BAPVC January 12, 2011 1
Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells Future Directions Stuart Bowden BAPVC January 2011
Stuart Bowden Co-Director of Solar Power Labs at ASU
Work relevant to BAPVC: • Pilot solar cell production line on
industry standard 6” wafers to advance processes, manufacturing science and metrology.
• Heterojunction solar cells for low temperature high efficiency cells
• Kerfless production of wafers at 10 to 100 µm using lasers.
• Nanostructured solar cells to achieve the 86.8% efficiency limit
• Tandems on InGaN.
Solar Power Laboratory 2
For QESST ERC: co-lead on Thrust 1 Terawatt PV and its implementation via the student pilot line testbed
Scale of the Problem - Motivation
• When I started in PV there was the hope that temperatures would return to normal
• Continually rising temperature makes our job more urgent
Solar Power Laboratory 3
Graph from 1996 Is the world heating up?
Graph of Today Just kept getting hotter
Scale of the solution
1.E-02
1.E-01
1.E+00
1.E+01
1.E+02
1.E+03
1.E+04
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
elct
ricity
gen
erat
ion,
PV
prod
uctio
n (G
W)
Year
World Electricity production
US Electricity Production
Cumulative PV production
New Generation (US)
PV production
New Generation (Wor
World Electricity production
US Electricity Production
Cumulative PV production
New Generation (US)
PV production
New Generation (Wor
• At Historic 40% growth
1. All new US generation ~5years
2. All new World generation ~ 10 years
3. Total US Production ~ 15 years
4. Total World Production ~ 20 years
Learning Curves
Plots from QESST and 1366
BOS and Efficiency
• With BOS prices equivalent to module prices higher efficiency modules reduce the cost of PV.
Solar Power Laboratory 6
Present
Current Silicon PV Market
Solar Power Laboratory 7
• Silicon prices have declined dramatically recent years
• Crystalline silicon continues to dominate the PV industry at 87% of the market in 2010
Current Silicon Device Technology
• Efficiency 15 – 22 % • Diffused junction emitter • SiN AR coating and
passivation • Screen printed contacts • Aluminum back surface
field • Large interaction
between component parts and processes
• Many Variations Solar Power Laboratory 8
IC Processes Solar Processes
Solar Power Laboratory 9
Process Past IC Heritage Present Solar cells Future Solar Cells
Feed stock Siemens process Siemens process Fluidized bed reactor
Ingot Cz Mono and/or multi Direct growth, ribbons
Wafering blade sawn wire sawn Kerf-less
Thickness 600 um ~200um 50-100 um
Doping High temperature diffusions
High temperature diffusions
Low temperature depositions of a-Si
Passivation Thermally grown silicon dioxide
Silicon nitride Al2O3, -ve SiN
Contacts Photolithography/ lift-off
Screen printed silver Copper Plating
Feedstock
• Electronic grade silicon fluctuates widely but at 40 $/kg :
• Better use of the Si feedstock is a key cost driver
* crystallization costs are in addition
Solar Power Laboratory 10
Current Future Efficiency 15% 20% Thickness 220 um 100 um Kerf 280 um Kerfless Si only cost* 0.3 $/W 0.05 $/W Wafer cost 0.7 $/W 0.1 $/W?
Feedstock
• Even when electronic grade silicon is cheap, new production methods needed to meet scalability requirements.
Solar Power Laboratory 11
Photo: REC
Wafering
Stuart Bowden BAPVC January 12, 2011 12
• Wafering wastes half the silicon in cutting and there is a limit to the device thickness
• Alternative wafering with ion implantation and peeling.
• At ASU we’ve adopted laser cleaving.
• Direct growth of substrates for ribbons etc
http://www.evergreensolar.com/
Surface Passivation
Solar Power Laboratory 13
present future
• Silicon solar cell peak efficiency is 10 - 100 µm.
• Surface activity dominates device performance as we go thinner
• Many options for surface passivation such as SiN, Al2O3, organics
• Need to tailor the surface passivation to the doping concentration and type.
Light Trapping
• Essential for wafers • Usually combined with
the surface texturing • Needs development
alongside surface passivation as sharp tips are recombination sites.
• Photonics. • Light trapping at the
module level?
Stuart Bowden BAPVC January 12, 2011 14
Metallization
• Silver price is being dragged up by the price of gold
• We can do roughly 10 times bigger industry than today.
Solar Power Laboratory 15
Fraunhofer-ISE
Material Abundance
Stuart Bowden BAPVC January 12, 2011 16
Metallization option Cu plating
• Copper is 100 times cheaper than silver
• Plating gives a much denser metal finger
• Wet process • Good for thin wafers • Cu diffuses in Si at
room temp
Stuart Bowden BAPVC January 12, 2011 17
Photo: Fraunhofer-ISE
UNSW
Silicon Heterojunction
Wide bandgaps such as aSi
give a junction as well as surface passivation.
Heterojunction reduces recombination, enabling high Voc
Low current due to absorption in the top a-Si and transparent conducting oxide (TCO)
Low fill factor
Stuart Bowden BAPVC January 12, 2011 18
Depletion Region
Surface Inversion
∆EV
Novel Device Design
Solar Power Laboratory 19
IBC solar cell has junction and all the contacts on the rear of the cell High JSC, low Rseries
Ease of module manufacture
Visually appealing
Multiple process steps
http://www.sunpowercorp.com
Manufacturability
• Critical to any new process technology is throughput.
• Many producers are above or near 1 GWp = 500 million wafers/year = 15 wafers/sec
• All inline processing vs batch processing • Solar cells are more like CDs than ICs • Module costs are increasingly important so need to
think how cell are to be encapsulated. Rear contacts are very attractive.
Solar Power Laboratory 20
Ideal Bulk Silicon Solar Cell
• 10 – 100 um thickness • N-type to tolerate impurities and low cost
feedstock • Surfaces are critical recombination sites • Low temperature processing for junctions and
metallization • Rear contact for ease of metallization and
incorporation in module • Efficiency ~ 25 % for reduced BOS
Solar Power Laboratory 21
Acknowledgements
Much of this material was taken from: • www.pveducation.org • QESST engineering research center kickoff
meeting • University PV courses especially
Honsberg (ASU) and Buonassisi (MIT)
Solar Power Laboratory 22
Advanced Silicon at Solar Power Lab.
• Nanostructures allow new physical mechanisms, which can be used to achieve solar cells with higher efficiency or new functionality
• Goal is to transition nanostructures to existing technologies
Conclusions
• Leverage points for lowering the cost of PV electricity
• 1) Increase efficiency to lower BOS • 2) lower direct cost with earth abundant
materials. • 3) increase scalability. • Decrease of waste in productions line.
Solar Power Laboratory 24