Crossfostering and “Bump Weaning”

4
1 Thank you for participating in SowBridge 2008-09. To start the presentation, advance one slide by pressing enter or the down or right arrow key. To see the additional piece on this CD, click on the title below. Breeding Herd Education Series 2008-2009 Timely, relevant & convenient learning SBCrossfostering.pdf Crossfostering and “Bump Weaning” Barbara Straw, DVM, PhD Michigan State University [email protected] 1 Straw, Dewey & Bürgi 1997 Percentage of Piglets Crossfostered on 96 farms Percent of pigs crossfostered Number of farms 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 8-9 10-11 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-19 Crossfostering in 14 N Carolina Sow Farms Parameter . Mean Range . Disrupted litters (%) 74.2 55 to 86 Multi-day foster litters (%) 31.8 3.7 to 60 Mortality intact litters (%) 2.2 0.6 to 4.8 Mortality diarupted litters (%) 18.6 11.0 to 29.6 Almond, Brightwell & Morrow 1996 2 Maturity at birth 3 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 7 9 11 13 Pigs per litter 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 7 9 11 13 Pigs per litter Preweaning mortality Weight at weaning goes down as litter size goes up Survival to weaning goes down as litter size goes up Influence of litter size on preweaning performance Weight (lb) compared to 10 4 Small piglets Control supplemented Percent survival 49% 74% Moody et al 1966 Unequal or too much competition results in failure of smaller pigs to acquire milk 5

Transcript of Crossfostering and “Bump Weaning”

Page 1: Crossfostering and “Bump Weaning”

1

Thank you for participating in SowBridge 2008-09.

To start the presentation, advance one slide by pressing enter or the down or right arrow key.

To see the additional piece on this CD, click on the title below.

Breeding Herd Education Series 2008-2009

Timely, relevant & convenient learning

SBCrossfostering.pdf

Crossfostering and “Bump Weaning”

Barbara Straw, DVM, PhD Michigan State University

[email protected]

1

Straw, Dewey & Bürgi 1997

Percentage of Piglets Crossfostered on 96 farms

Percent of pigs crossfostered

Num

ber

of fa

rms

0 5

10 15 20 25 30 35 40

0-1 2.-3 4.-5 6.-7 8.-9 10.-11 12.-13 14-15 16-17 18-19 0-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 8-9 10-11 12-13 14-15 16-17 18-19

Crossfostering in 14 N Carolina Sow Farms Parameter . Mean Range . Disrupted litters (%) 74.2 55 to 86 Multi-day foster litters (%) 31.8 3.7 to 60 Mortality intact litters (%) 2.2 0.6 to 4.8 Mortality diarupted litters (%) 18.6 11.0 to 29.6

Almond, Brightwell & Morrow 1996

2

Maturity at birth

3

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

7 9 11 13

Pigs per litter

Wt c

ompa

red

to 1

0

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

7 9 11 13

Pigs per litter

Pre

we

an

ing

mo

rta

lity

Weight at weaning goes down as litter size goes up

Survival to weaning goes down as litter size goes up

Influence of litter size on preweaning performance

Wei

ght (

lb) c

ompa

red

to 1

0

4

Small piglets Control supplemented

Percent survival 49% 74%

Moody et al 1966

Unequal or too much competition results in failure of smaller pigs to acquire milk

5

Page 2: Crossfostering and “Bump Weaning”

2

Birth sows

Preweaning mortality of < 1.76 lb pigs Birth sow 62% Marcatti Neto 1986

Pigs < 1.76 lb

6

Birth sows Nurse sow

Preweaning mortality of < 1.76 lb pigs Birth sow 62% Uniform nurse sow 15.4% Marcatti Neto 1986 7

Least variation w/in litter Most variation

Variation of wt w/in litter Preweaning mortality 32 Least 17.7%

32 Most 27.2%

English & Brampton 1982 8

Control litters Crossfostered

Litter Preweaning mortality Control 12.8%

Crossfostered 7.1%

English & Brampton 1982 9

Optimum time to move a pig Highest growth rate in piglets transferred 6-12 hrs after birth to a sow that just farrowed and worst in piglets transferred immediately after birth to a sow that farrowed 2 days earlier (litter social order already established)

Gruiniewska 1983

10

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

1 2 3 4 5 6

Hour

Pigs

with

succ

essf

ul su

cklin

g

2-9 hr2 da4 da7 da

Cumulative number of pigs (out of 12) that successfully suckled within 6 hrs after being fostered

Price, Hutson, Price and Borgward. 1994

11

Page 3: Crossfostering and “Bump Weaning”

3

100

75

50

25

0 0 5 15 20 25

Days of Age

% t

rans

fer c

ompl

ete

Late Early

12 9 6

Crossfostering disease

13

Location during nursing recorded before and after foster 14

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 R L R L R L R L R L R L R L

am pm am pm am pm am pm

am pm am pm am pm am pm am pm

LARGE OUT #9205

Pre-

tran

sfer

Po

st-tr

ansf

er

15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 R L R L R L R L R L R L R L

am pm am pm am pm am pm am

am pm am pm am pm am pm

SMALL OUT #544

Pre-

trans

fer

Post

-tran

sfer

16 17

Page 4: Crossfostering and “Bump Weaning”

4

Piglets are even at birth but at 3-5 days of age one has “fallen back”

18

Small, fall-back (pink) pigs made into •  Whole foster litters or •  Left in original litter

19

Piglets placed into a litter on a nurse sow

11 9

10 7

37

6 3 5 2

16

No. pigs Wt (kg) No. pigs Wt (kg)

1.55 1.65 1.97 2.16 1.78

1.65 1.50 2.19 2.00 1.84

At start:

Piglets left in original litter

20

25

15

5

Pre-weaning Mortality %

Nurse sow Original

1/37 3 % 4/16 25%

21

2 8 4 6 4

6

8

lb

0.2 lb

0.8 lb

days after transfer

Nurse sow

Original

Weight after Transfer to Nurse Sow

P = 0.01

4

3

2

kg

22

Several rules are important in a crossfostering program: · Transfer piglets within 6-24 hrs of birth to: o Even up numbers of piglets per litter – move the big pigs instead of

the small ones o Even up piglet sizes within litters · At 5 days after farrowing, look for fall backs o Transfer them to a nurse sow or automatic milk replacer feeding

station Don’t have an infatuation with consistency

Application to the Farm

23