Criminalisation of the Judiciary

8/19/2019 Criminalisation of the Judiciary

1/21

1 | P a g e

1 | P a g e

From To

MANIKANDAN VATHAN T.S.THAKUR

ADVOCATE, 60 Law Chambers, CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA

High Court, Madras. New Delhi.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Brother Shri.Thakur,

Sub – Grave charges of criminal misconduct against Shri.Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Chief Justice, Madras High Court, & his coterie, including inter alia,

(1) Encouraging ‘Fake-Advocates’ & ‘Fake-Courts’ in Tamilnadu,

(2) Exploiting Judges of the Supreme Court, including a former CJI (Chief Justice of India),

(3) Actively Encouraging & Aiding Criminalisation of the Bar,

(4) Ensuring Criminalisation of the Bench,

(4) Promoting Sectarian autocracy in judicial administration,

(5) Appointing criminals, and persons with criminal antecedents as Judges & Prosecutors,

(6) Usage of printed forms as bail orders & filling-up cause-title and sections of law,

(7) Rigging murder-trials to shield criminals,

(8) Sacrificing honest-judges to protect murderers & contract-killers,

(9) FIXING, SETTING, TRAPPING & IMPERSONATING honest judges & entangling them in corruption

charges, doctored audio-video tapes & PLANTING a compliant judge to try a sensational murder.

(10) Vendetta & illegal suspension of 44 genuine lawyers who questioned the above evils, etc.

IN-HOUSE / OPEN INQUIRY – REQUEST - REGARDING

1) Your ex-colleague Shri.Markandey Katju has disclosed in his electronic publications, as to

how he had prepared the list of candidates for appointment as judges to the Madras High

Court, during his tenure as Chief Justice. Sadly, his choices were most unfortunate, as you are

fortunately well aware-of, and the root cause lay in his innovation - namely consulting a few

senior members of the bar, and recommending names, which were common in their

respective lists. Brother katju - a silver-spoon kid, new to the state, was apparently too naïve

to know of the traditions of syndicate-bidding which Tamilnadu has been adopting since it

ventured into the liquor trade in the 70’s & 80’s. The so-called ‘SENIOR ADVOCATES’ muzzled

into the selection-list, a coterie of their own juniors, who continue to rule the roost till date.

But what you are not aware-of is that, Chennai judges and lawyers have already predicted

(calculated), as to who would be India’s Chief Justice, 20 to 25 years from now. Even DJ

(District Judge) selections are based on who would, or would not become CJI at the end of

their careers. Accordingly, District Judge selections are rigged to ensure that favorites

become future CJI’s.

2) When Shri.Sanjay Kaul assumed office as Chief Justice, he got prepared a list of names for

appointment as judges to the Madras High Court, from God knows, who. But a senior

advocate Shri.Gandhi, who manages to infiltrate at least a handful of juniors every time a

selection list goes through, apparently had no say in Sanjay’s scheme of things. Hence,

Gandhi in league with a quack who calls himself Captain.S.Prabakaran, the self-styled Co-

Chairman of the BCI (Bar Council of India) where no such post exists, deftly played the caste

card, and commenced a series of agitations in the Madras high court premises claiming that

there was inadequate representation for non-brahmins in the selection list. His machinations

and scheming manipulations led to popular revulsion and deception, so much so that even

Justice Shri.Karnan had to walk into a court-room hearing a challenge to the proposed listand lodge a formal protest. Eventually, the list had to be scrapped in toto.


2/21

2 | P a g e

2 | P a g e

3) Captain.S.Prabakaran, whom nobody knows as a law student, and whose law degree is from

Utopia, specializes in the very unique business of inviting successive Chief Justices and

Supreme Court judges to ‘staged’ functions in star hotels. These functions are nothing but

photo-ops to generate business – business of the kind, which is hitherto unheard-of, and too

repulsive to pen down. His event-management skills, have thence been adopted by several

core-criminals, who are now wining and dining with sitting Madras High Court judges,awarding them bogus degrees including Ph.D’s and cheating not only the police &

government machinery, but the gullible public en masse. I shall provide photos to show how

Prabakaran & company entices Chief Justices & puisne judges to functions, clicks pictures with them, and fools

the public. I shall also provide photos of several judges of Madras High Court recreating themselves, in

functions hosted by habitual criminals. The fraternity will be shocked to know their identities.

4) Prabakaran’s partner in crime, Shri.Selvam, (Chairman of the State Bar Council) too seems to have

never seen a law college. Apart from the bogus law degrees of these 2 bar council leaders, it

is to be noted that several fake advocates have been infiltrated into the Tamilnadu bar, by

these 2 persons, for extraneous reasons, and electoral gains. Unconfirmed reports even

indicate that the higher judiciary too has been thus infiltrated, and if this is true, it is achallenge that even you may not be able to overcome, with all the might at your command,

as Chief Justice of this great nation. The irony is that most of these fake-advocates, do not

know what a court-room even looks-like. They were criminals (including detainees serving

multiple preventive detentions) earlier, or who have taken to crime pursuant to their new

found lawyer-status. These bands of thugs move around in cities, challenging the police and

judiciary, wearing black and white, and bullying them to release criminals. Most of them are

running crime-syndicates, with a hapless judicial machinery merrily playing ball.

5) Not satisfied with this, several of them made it to the posts of public prosecutors, and

themselves became accused as well as prosecutors. Successive Chief Justices merrily signed

on the dotted line and welcomed them into the fraternity, in violation of the statute (CrPC)

which prescribes their manner of appointment. Resultantly, even robbery & theft case

accused who were habitual criminals became public prosecutors in trial courts and began

conducting murder-trials etc. The same police-officials who once arrested and prosecuted

them were now forced to wait at their door, and seek appointments in connection with

pending cases, and/or for legal opinions.

6) The depravity went even further. Several lawyers, both bogus and real began to conduct

‘FAKE-COURTS’ in Tamilnadu, calling themselves as judges. Their court-halls had

paraphernalia that would put to shame the lawfully established constitutional courts under

your current leadership. The modus operandi is to run organisations claiming to be HumanRights Commissions, and Arbitrators. These ‘JUDGES’ issue notices under the Arbitration Act

on a fomented litigation between strangers, and usurped property by passing decrees and

registering the decrees with the registration department. Legitimacy is lent to these

‘CRIMINALS-TURNED-JUDGES’ by hosting functions with sitting high court judges & retired

supreme court judges, organized by Prabakaran & Co. Unwittingly & wittingly, regular

members of the bar began filing vakalats in these fake courts and exploited the public.

District Judges functioning under your leadership shamelessly began hearing appeals from

these FAKE-COURTS. When I moved a writ petition, the otherwise sensible Chief Justice of

the Madras High Court, was very disturbed by the fact that FAKE-JUDGES used red beacons

atop their vehicles, and began issuing a series of directions vis-à-vis use of beacon lights.Realising the futility of requesting the court to exercise its powers vis-à-vis FAKE-COURTS, I

moved the Supreme Court, after the petitioner withdrew his writ petition in the Madras High

Court. But the Supreme Court was no different, since it directed me to approach the Madras

high Court once again. Hence the High Court was moved again, this time on its criminal side,

due to the previous bitter experience before the Chief Justice. But it kept the matter in cold

storage, for over a year, thus allowing the fleecing of the public, who felt that quick-justice

was purchasable in the FAKE-COURTS, rather than the REAL-COURTS, such as the High Court

established by the constitution - since issues ranging from service matters, to rent control to

property disputes and even criminal cases, including non-existent disputes were

adjudicated, decreed and even enforced through government departments, whereas even

orders of the Supreme court & High court are not enforced by the local government.


3/21

3 | P a g e

3 | P a g e

7) It is in this background that yet another shocking dimension enters the picture. One

Shri.Sankararaman who dared to question the financial & sexual sleaze in the renowned

Sankara mutt in Kanchipuram town, was bumped-off by hired assailants, inside the historical

Varadaraja Perumal temple. 5 unconnected persons were made to surrender in the case, to

mislead the investigations. However, police found that one of them was actually in prison on

the date of the murder, and hence disbelieved their version. Detailed investigations revealedthat Sankararaman was murdered inside the temple by hirelings organized by the head of

the mutt Shri.Jayendra. This mutt was a symbol of the majority religion in this country, and

its head was venerated as divine by Hindus, and served as the leader of the Brahminical cult.

Hindus in general, and Brahmins in particular were aghast and infuriated when Jayendra was

arrested. Several people raised a war-cry of religion-in-danger, fundamentalists attacked

lawyers inside the Madras High Court, where the bail plea was heard directly, superseding

the lower courts.

8) However a near-perfect investigation, reinforced by 164 statements of all prime witnesses,

and an approver, led to prosecution. But the case was sabotaged due to prosecution

connivance after a change in government so much so that that the CIO (Chief Investigating

Officer) was denied access to the case diary prior to his examination, and had to move a writ

petition in the Madras High Court to access it. The man who denied him the records was a

mere DSP called Shri.Veeramani, whereas the CIO was an SP called Shri.Shaktivel, an official 2

ranks higher in a uniformed force. This clearly meant that the entire prosecution including

the unqualified Public Prosecutor (who used to address the accused as SWAMIKAL (GODS)), and

the police force had entered the payrolls of the accused. Witness after witness was coaxed,

bribed, bullied & intimidated into turning hostile, including the approver who was tendered a

pardon. Yet the existence of prima facie evidence in the form of video-footage, 164

statements, etc, unnerved the accused, and they made an attempt to de-seat a non-compliant trial-judge Shri.Ramasamy. With this sinister objective (which was brought to my notice only

recently), several persons, cooked-up audio-tapes (a telephonic conversation) and videos to get the

trial judge shifted. The clips pertained to electronic-tapes discussing a bribe-payment and a

promised pending payment between the trial judge, and the prime-accused. How much

money was originally paid by the prime accused, to whom and through whom, remains

speculative till date. The tapes, peddled by a leading-journalist close to Captain Prabakaran

was brought to my notice, informing me that the trial-judge had been purchased, and that I

had to do something for justice to prevail.

9) Hence a complaint was preferred to the Vigilance cell of the High court, and due to media

pressure and adverse publicity, a summon was received calling upon the complainant to

appear for enquiry at the chamber of the Registrar (Vigilance). In response, when we visited

the venue, the gentleman who was present therein declined to divulge his identity or

designation, even as he sought to know our identity. His attire made us all the more

suspicious since his tie-knot was at chest level, and his left shoe lay upside-down in the right

corner of the room whereas his right shoe lay scattered on the left corner of the enquiry

room. It was only much later, after we walked out protesting his misconduct that we came to

know that his name was Shri.Authinathan, a judge of the lower court, and that he was

deputed to conduct the enquiry. Since his cowardice and abnormal behavior could serve no

purpose, and since the functioning of the office of the registrar (vigilance) was even worse,

we moved a writ petition against the Registrar (Vigilance) seeking a direction to conduct a

police investigation into the veracity of the tapes, and if found to be authentic, to order a re-

trial of the murder case.

10) In an unprecedented action, a single judge of the High court, Ms.Suguna not only entertained

the writ petition but also STAYED the murder trial at my request. The accused intervened

through 2 proxy proceedings in the name of a fictitious person, called Thirumurugan, with a

bogus address, and visibly forged signatures. Furthermore, they purchased/procured a court-

slip (used for urgent processing & listing of cases) from the court of another judge (21st court), and

bribed their way through the registry to list it before Suguna (10th court). When the aforesaid

frauds were exposed, their counsel, Shri.MV.Muralidharan backed off.


4/21

4 | P a g e

4 | P a g e

11) In the meantime, one Shri.Raja, an advocate, approached me seeking a copy of the affidavit

(pleading), stating that the entire case record in the High Court was being kept a secret. I

promptly gave him a copy, and he approached the accused at the mutt, and secured their

brief. He filed an impleading petition in the name of the 3rd accused Mr.Sundaresa Iyer and

sought dismissal of our writ petition. The co-counsel in the case, whom I had never seen was

one Shri.Arivunithi, through whom Mr.Raja reportedly contacted the mutt and gained theirconfidence by presenting the affidavit collected from me. The role of the absentee Arivunithi

is significant on account of the influence of the accused with a judge called

V.Ramasubramaniam who is the aspirant to the office held by you, namely CJI. This issue of

Arivunithi has been elaborated at length, in the succeeding para 32.

12) Upon hearing news of the STAY, and the bribe-tapes, Mrs.Padma, the widow of slain

Sankararaman and her son-in-law (both prosecution witnesses) approached the Chief Justice

of the High Court, with a representation narrating the manner in which they were terrorized

and forced to turn hostile during trial. Padma had sought action against the prosecution for

their connivance with the criminals, and also action against the trial judge vis-à-vis the

bribe-tapes. But the Chief Justice reportedly forwarded her plea to the very same Registrar

(Vigilance). Hence she sued the Chief Justice in his administrative capacity to grant sanction

to register an FIR against the trial judge. The Chief Justice then invited me to his chamber

through the then Registrar General, but I declined to meet him without the Registrar General

assigning reasons for the proposed meeting. I was then persuaded to meet him as a

humanitarian gesture, since I was told that that the Chief Justice was on a fast (Friday or

Ramzan, or both, I can’t recollect), and was waiting for a long time to meet me before going for a

late lunch, that he was a diabetic etc. In fact, I was tricked into meeting the Registrar

General in the first place, and had rushed to her chamber upon the request of a friend who

secured my presence claiming to be in urgent need of some assistance.

13) So, when I met the Chief Justice at his chamber, he placed before me a file comprising

various representations sent to him from time to time (over several years), seeking several

reforms in court administration, and tried to please me by saying that he had directed the

registry to look into and take action on all my representations, immediately. He then

requested me to remove his name from the array of respondents’ (sole respondent) on the

petition filed by Mrs.Padma. When I asked him as to why he was making such a request, he

stated that it would create an obstacle for his elevation to the Supreme Court. I countered

him, stating that there were no personal allegations against him and all that was sought was

an exercise of an administrative duty, which was improperly exercised. The Chief Justice

insisted that there were personal allegations, and when I asked him to show the same, hedeclined to go into the same, and insisted on my removing him from the cause title. I

declined to do so, and left his chamber. His parting statement was a personal but

insignificant appeal, and since I gave my word, I cannot reveal it to you or anyone.

14) At the final hearing of the writ petitions, the division bench comprising Gandhi’s erstwhile

junior Shri.Paul Vasantha Kumar & another, persuaded me for over 2 hours to withdraw the

writ petitions, and proceeded to hear me only after I lodged a strong protest at its conduct.

Eventually, it devised a safety-valve whereby, although it ordered a police-probe into the

bribe-tapes to be done by the cyber-crime cell, it lifted the stay on the trial, virtually allowing

the bribery or the attempt to fructify. But, the criminals had the last laugh, as the trial-judge

who allegedly featured in the tapes, was removed in the interregnum (through administrative

orders), and a compliant man of choice was brought- in. As for our request for a re-trial, the

court held that the family of the deceased could move appropriate petitions to assist the

prosecution etc before the new trial judge, and even partake in the appeal, if the judgment

based on the trial was not appropriate. Most interestingly, veiled threats against us

(counsels) were found in the orders passed on Padma’s petition etc, vis-à-vis her suing the

Chief Justice etc.

15) In other words, even the powers conferred upon the Chief Justice by the Supreme Court,

(vis-à-vis criminal prosecution of a bribe-taking judge) was sought to be found-fault with, so as to

favour the bribe-givers and bribe-takers in this case, and all quoted precedents (wherein the

administrative actions of various Chief Justices’ were challenged), were simply brushed aside.


5/21

5 | P a g e

5 | P a g e

16) When the trial resumed, due to prosecutorial hostility the widow of the deceased

Mrs.Padma herself filed 2 petitions (Crl MP’s 551 & 574 of 2012), seeking to recall and

re-examine the hostile witnesses (who were not declared as such by the prosecution), and also to take

action against hostile witnesses, including the hostile approver. She had also sought an

interim direction for police protection for her family, since she claimed that she had earlier

turned hostile due to threats in the court campus. But she was now allegedly intimidated this

time by the new trial judge Shri.Murugan himself (who is believed to have been ‘PLANTED’ & ‘FIXED’

by/for the accused) and told to withdraw the 2 applications, whereupon he would grant police

protection. Murugan was bent upon hearing arguments and rendering a judgment,

notwithstanding the pendency of the 2 petitions and also the 308 CrPC petition filed in the

year 2010 against the sole-approver who had turned hostile (Crl MP 668/10). Furthermore,

when the deceased’s son Shri.Ananda Sharma sought copies of the depositions, the PP & trial

judge started playing musical chair, to dodge issuance. So the son of the deceased moved the

Madras High Court (Crl OP 10606/12), with the above claims and sought police protection

besides a direction to dispose the 2 petitions. But Mr.Nagamuthu a judge of the high court,

illegally heard the same PP Shri.Devadass of the trial court, overlooking the statutorily

appointed PP of the Puducherry government in the High court (who stayed away deliberately), and

directed that the 2 MP’s should be decided by the trial judge Murugan himself. Nagamuthu

purposely overlooked the misconduct of Murugan who intimidated the old widow, and also

his action of denying her the case records.

17) Hence, even after Nagamuthu’s order, the deceased’s family was once again intimidated by

the trial judge Murugan, who was hobnobbing with defence counsel such as Shri.PN.Prakash

etc, and hence the son of the deceased filed a Crl OP No 17602/12 U/s 407 (1) (c) (IV) seeking

to transfer the trial to the High Court itself. But again the Puduchery state PP (appointed as per

the CrPC) abandoned the case, and the same Devadass who was the trial court PP was made toappear in violation of the CrPC. Shri.Arumugasamy, a judge of the Madras High Court

declined to grant any hearing to the petitioner’s counsel. So the counsel narrated his

misconduct and recused herself in writing. The judge allowed the recusal, virtually indicting

himself and authenticating his misconduct, and dismissed the petition without even hearing

anybody on behalf of the petitioner. The counsel then wrote about this misbehaviour to the

Chief Justice, and requested him to train the puisne judge to notify the parties before

deciding cases, in the event of counsel recusing.

18) Similarly, when the son of the deceased Mr.Anand Sharma filed a copy application seeking a

copy of the tapes which were marked as M.O.s 15 to 24, (instead of exhibits), trial judgeMurugan issued notice on the copy application (to the prosecutor Mr.Devadass, and all the 24

accused), and secured replies-in-opposition. Curiously enough, PP Devadass filed a reply

stating that the tapes could not be issued, since they were virus-infested. The fact that the PP

is objecting to issuance of documents marked during trial to the deceased’s son who is a

prosecution witness, speaks for itself, but the claim that it is virus-infested is highly

malicious, since it is in the custody of the court, and not the prosecutor, and the PP can have

no knowledge whatsoever, as to whether it was virus-infested or not. Furthermore it forms

part of the evidence which needs to be viewed by the trial judge before rendering judgment.

Hence, Anand moved the High Court, and the very same judge Arumugasamy misbehaved

with the counsel, and the counsel’s recusal from this case was followed by issuance of noticeto the said Anand, as per the counsel’s earlier letter requesting the Chief Justice to train

Arumugasamy on procedures. But in order to defeat the petition in the High Court, the trial

judge cunningly issued an order granting a copy of the tapes to the accused counsel,

PN.Prakash, even before the petitioner was made aware of such an order.

19) The copy applicant (deceased Sankararaman’s son) was not aware of this order since he was

denied access to the court and also being taunted, mocked and abused by the trial judge in

open court to please the accused (including comments about his IAS exam preparations), and was in

fact awaiting orders from the High court to access the tapes. Utilising the copy of the order,

PN.Prakash moved the High Court and got the order STAYED, without our knowledge.


6/21

6 | P a g e

6 | P a g e

20) When the son of the deceased Sankararaman moved an RTI application before Murugan,

seeking to know under what authority/order Mr.Devadass was functioning as Special PP for

his father’s murder trial alone, the trial judge Murugan wrote back stating that,

(A) The judiciary does not come under the RTI,

(B) That he does not know the basis on which the said PP was functioning in his

court for this murder trial alone, and(C) That he does NOT even know, where the said information was available.

This information was sought, since it was widely believed that the Special PP was a puppet

set up by the accused after getting the case transferred from Tamilnadu to Puduchery.

Furthermore, the accused who got the Sankararaman murder case transferred to Puduchery

did not seek transfer of the Radhakrishnan attempt to murder case. The Sankararaman

murder was only a sequel to the Radhakrishnan attempt to murder case, and all the grounds

for inter-state transfer remained common to both cases. The suspicions about Special PP

Devadass arose from his conduct in conducting the case, non-declaration of hostile witnesses

as such, and not cross-examining them as per 154 IEA, etc. His legal qualification itself is

suspect since he,(A) Does not even know how to file pleadings,

(B) Does not even know that pleadings should be prepared para-wise,

(C) Does not even know that the paras should be assigned paragraph numbers, and

(D) Does not even know that investigating officers should sign the pleadings, etc.

But despite several representations and even a writ petition challenging his appointment,

judges such as Mr.Sasidharan simply tossed away the cases, from bench to bench, to protect

the culprits.

21) In the meantime, PP Devadass is suspected to have negotiated a deal with the son of thedeceased, and he abruptly withdrew all the proceedings filed by him both in the high court as

well as the sessions court, in lieu of suspected ‘blood-money’. This was followed by a written

complaint signed by several members of the Puduchery bar addressed to several judges of

the supreme court as well as the high Court besides various journalists claiming that a sum of

Rs.20 crores was paid as a fresh bribe to trial judge Murugan through the Registrar General

Shri.Chockalingam and an advocate called Alaganandam. These complaints to various

members of the higher judiciary & journalist’s were ignored, and even hushed-up. When I

wrote to the said Chockalingam seeking a copy of the cyber-crime report, he wrote back

stating that it cannot be issued, as it was in the purview of the administrative committee.

22) It was over 2 years since the cyber-crime enquiry was ordered and report submitted, and

since the writ petition was refused to be listed, I moved a fresh writ petition seeking todisclose the contents of the cyber-crime report and also to probe the 20 crore bribe charge.

This writ petition was refused to be numbered by the Registrar General, and it began to get

tossed around from bench to bench. Mr.CT.Selvam, a known DMK man & Karunanidhi

follower sitting on the bench claimed that the administrative committee cannot be sued and

added the Registrar General as a party to the writ petition to enable the High Court to

respond to the writ petition. Thereafter it was posted before Mr.V.Ramasubramaniam a

devotee of the Sankara mutt, and due to our objection vis-à-vis his proximity to the prime

accused, it was re-assigned to another bench.

23) By this time, the lead counsel for the assassins, namely PN.Prakash was elevated as a High

court judge, amidst stiff opposition from the bar due to his partisan and communal (casteist)mindset, and within a month, Murugan rendered his judgment acquitting all the accused

including those who surrendered as “FAKE-ACCUSED”. The judgment cited PN.Prakash as

being both a counsel for accused as well as a sitting high court judge. On the night of the

acquittal I was interviewed by SUN TV, in a panel discussion and I narrated most of the above

facts. The writ petition which was being kept in cold storage was listed overnight, before the

bench of Mr.Sudhakar, and when told that the interim prayer for STAY has become

infructuous due to the acquittal, Sudhakar feigned ignorance about the acquittal and started

all over again stating that the administrative committee cannot be sued etc. He then

complained that the papers were mixed-up and not in order, and I responded by stating that

the registry has mixed up the papers since it was originally filed as a single judge matter, but

was now before a division bench, and that if I was provided access to the record, I would sort

it out, for the convenience of the bench.


7/21

7 | P a g e

7 | P a g e

24) Sudhakar then recorded the discussion on 14.2.14, but cunningly instructed the SAR (Sub-

Assistant Registrar Mrs.Sowbagyalakshmi, not to allow me access to the case records so as to

prevent it from being re-arranged & organized. This was done to prevent the case from being

listed for hearing. Whenever I approached Sowbagyalakshmi, (I had to approach her because, unlike inlower courts, Madras high court’s daily orders are not known/shown to the public or even counsels unless they are interim or

final orders) she replied that she could not show the case papers to me because of Sudhakar’s

orders. When I asked her to show atleast the written order passed by the bench, shedeclined to do so and promised to secure a copy with Sudhakar’s permission. This was also

declined, and finally after a year, she went to the extent of issuing an unofficial copy, sans

any court seal, and lamented about her being subjected to servile treatment, despite her

graduating from the prestigious Stella Maris college. Be that as it may, the unofficial copy of

the 14.2.14 order was issued by Sowbhagyalakshmi on 6.2.15, WITHOUT the court seal, and I

was shocked to notice that as per the contents therein, I was supposed to amend portions of

the pleadings. Hence I wrote to her officially to open up the case record for carrying-out the

court order, but she again parroted the same story vis-à-vis Sudhakar. Finally on 12.6.15,

while I was out of station, Sudhakar cunningly got it listed and despite my junior expressing

my absence due to the sudden out-of-turn listing, he CLOSED the case, stating that I had NOT

complied with his orders to amend the petition, (viz. the petition which was directed to be amended, but

which petition was NEVER even shown to me for amendment, despite persistent demands).

25) Several of these events were being orchestrated at the bidding of Justice PN.Prakash, the

erstwhile counsel for the accused in the murder case who formed a cabal with a coterie of

Brahmin judges namely Ramasubramaniam (the aspiring CJI, who is mentioned earlier),

Vaidyanathan, Sathish Agnihotri and Chief Justice Sanjay Kaul. This quintette evolved under

the common sectarian ideology namely the brahmanisation of the judiciary, and

concentration of power for ulterior purposes. Towards this object, they mended fences with

the gangs of quacks of the ilk of Captain Prabakaran, etc, who were involved in all sorts of

criminal activities in Chennai city, and began to partake in a series of functions organized by

them, and published gigantic pictures in papers and as posters on Chennai’s public roads.

Several cut-outs and hoardings of the judges’ were erected, massive posters pasted, making

the Indian judiciary a laughing stock in the eyes of the public. The only saving grace is the

fact that the larger public did not know that the lawyers featuring therein are quacks and

also criminals. Even Sanjay Kaul was featured wearing massive garlands which even the most

publicity-hungry politicians of this state would be jealous of. I shall attach all the

photographic and videographic proof for your appreciation.

26) Taking a cue from the (mis)conduct of this coterie, a sitting high court judge by name,

Mr.Tamilvanan (discussed earlier) proclaimed to have received a doctorate at the hands of

one Selwyn, a dubious character running a fake “TAMIL UNIVERSITY”, based in the USA.

Selwyn’s criminal nexus and antecedents are beyond doubt, since they feature images with a

habitual cheat called “POWER STAR” who has several cheating cases against him, and a

habitual goonda called Varichiyur Selvam who too was reportedly awarded the same

doctorate. ‘Varichiyur Selvam’ was detained not once or twice but several times under

preventive detention, and each time has managed to get out even without a habeas corpus.

Dr.Tamilvanan was greeted and felicitated by the judges, advocates and bar associations,

making a mockery of the Indian judiciary, and addressed as Dr.Tamilvanan in the official

cause list of the Madras High Court. This is not all about Tamilvanan. A formal written

complaint was preferred by his office staffer, alleging sexual assault by Tamilvanan, and the

High Court as an institution hushed it up by cautioning the victim about her career prospects

and remedying her, by transferring her out of Tamilvanan’s chamber.

27) Similar is the case with yet another judge by name Mr.Dhanabalan, who was working as a

telegraphic assistant in a full time job from 1976 to 88 and became a high court judge

claiming that he had done a full time law degree course between 1980 to 83. But despite

repeated & persistent complaints along with bounteous proof presented by none other than

a sitting judge of the Madras High Court, Sanjay Kaul not only ignored them but went to the

extent of joining hands with the accused judge. In an eccentric and sadistic act of retaliation,

Sanjay Kaul expressed total solidarity with Dhanapalan, rewarding him with plum portfolios

and helping him loot besides going to the extent of accompanying him to the Governor and

other dignitaries for various functions, thus conveying the message that Dhanabalan has his

complete blessings and support, and that he cannot be touched, no matter the forgery and

fraud. Similarly, when the complaint of Dhanabalan’s daughter-in-law alleging harassment,

dowry etc came up, Mr.Nagamuthu threw out a simple petition to register and investigate

her complaint. It is important to note that Dhanabalan’s son was promoted as a non -

practising lawyer, and allowed to loot without basic legal skills. A scrutiny of their assets and

IT returns will throw up an astronomical divide, and this boy had a cut-off limit. He could beapproached only for matters where the cutting is above 20 lakhs, for interim orders.


8/21

8 | P a g e

8 | P a g e

28) Another judge by name Justice B.Rajendran got himself felicitated by Sanjay Kaul, the bar etc,

as if he was “APPOINTED” as Regional Vice-Chairman of the CMJA (Commonwealth Magistrates

and Judges Association) based in London, and got this story to be published in all leading

newspapers of the city. As usual (similar to Tamilvanan) lawyers and bar associations felicitated

him, published pictures etc, and made it a gala affair. Sanjay Kaul conned the bar by saying

that, “Rajendran got the recognition due to his ‘knowledge’, etc”. Rajendran, in-turn fooledus all by claiming that “though there were at least 7 members from each country, only I

represented India. But surprisingly the Chief Justice of Canada nominated me which was

seconded by the Chief Justice of Sri lanka.” The fact remains that CMJA is an association

which is registered as a charity in the UK, where one has to pay to even enroll as a member.

So the claim of appointment etc is pure humbug. This is the style followed by Prabakaran and

his guru namely Adish Agarwala, whereby they create such letter pad organizations and

invite judges for photo-ops & fool around with the public and governments, to earn money.

29) Similar is the case of another judge Mr.CT.Selvam who has been gracing functions and

playing guest to a fake “Additional Director General” of a bogus ‘National Cyber Security

Council’ called Mr.Amar Prasad Reddy, a school drop-out. Besides, Selvam even appointed

this rascal to investigate a criminal complaint of woman harassment which was under

investigation by the state police. Even Sanjay Kaul as CJ of Punjab had written a letter of

appreciation honouring this cheat, and this fake ADG Amar has been using the letter to

deceive not only the public, but also bagging contracts etc, from various governments.

30) It is also alleged by a sitting judge of the Madras High that Justice Mr.ManiKumar had raped

an intern called Saraswathi (name changed) and that she had even borne a child out of the

rape. Instead of protecting young interns who are of their daughter’s age, and who are

appointed by the high court for learning and assisting the court, judges such as Manikumar

impregnate them, and get away. This judge Manikumar too is Sanjay Kaul’s favourite. I thinkthat the CJI should rehabilitate the victim and the baby, but dear brother Thakur, whether

you take on the rapist or not, depends on what legacy you wish to leave behind as CJI.

31) Similarly, even a former judge of the Madras High Court Shri.Ashok Kumar is alleged by a

leading former BBC journalist to have been an ex-convict. Yet he had been elevated to the

High Court, and the high court went hammer and tongs to defend him even as abundant

proof of his availing reservation benefits despite having converted to Christianity was

presented. If the IB can clear a convict, it simply means that even the IB (Intelligence Bureau)

is purchased by judges, so much so that your office viz. the CJI and the collegium is stumped

with FALSE reports even by the IB. From peons to judges, from state constabulary to IB, the

Chennai judiciary has corrupted everyone. The list of such Madras high court judges’ goes on

and on, but I wish to confine myself only to the tip of the ice-berg, since I would require

reams and reams of paper to pen down the entire picture.

32) While this is the state of affairs vis-à-vis the higher judiciary, selections to the lower judiciary

as well as appointment of District Judges’ has been even worse. The Brahmin coterie headed

by Mr.Ramasubramaniam ensured the total rigging of selection in District Judge

appointments, where a last minute addition or subtraction of a single mark or a couple of

marks made the difference between in and out. In a blatantly illegal manner 25 percent of

marks were set apart for the interview, and absolute favouritism ruled the roost,

compounded by the fact that several criminals were appointed as District Judges, with their

criminal antecedents having been suppressed in their application form itself, as well as by

securing a bogus police verification. It is even reported that the wife of Mr.Arivunithi (counsel

for Sundaresa Iyer, mentioned in para 12 above) was accommodated by Mr.Ramasubramaniam,

despite being absolutely ineligible on more scores than one. The criminals who were selected

and who are serving as District Judges were not only selected by suppressing their

antecedents, but even gave FALSE addresses on their applications to evade detection during

police verification. It is this man Mr.Ramasubramaniam, the author and architect of all this

rigging and fixing, who is moving around claiming that he is the future CJI, and there is no

denial of the fact of his relationship with the murder case accused namely the

Shankaracharyas of kanchi.


9/21

9 | P a g e

9 | P a g e

33) A scrutiny of several videos of police interrogation of the accused in the Sankararaman

murder case, and their contract-killers clearly betrays their might & clout, not only with the

political set-up, but also shows how judges of the Supreme Court had been queueing up to

them, and seeking favours. For the sake of decency, I am withholding release of most of

these tapes in the public domain, since several tapes recorded, recovered and seized during

investigations throw light not only on the misconduct of the religious functionaries but alsothe politician-priesthood-judiciary nexus. It is to be borne in mind that the deceased

Sankararaman was more concerned about deterioration of the morals and values, and had

taken upon himself the task of exposing sexual sleaze. Since I do not intend to enter the

private lives of those who call themselves VVIP’s, it is my endeavour to let sleazy bygones be

bygones, as they would not serve any useful purposes because almost all of them are retired

persons, and the damage they could have done to society can never be undone, and only

institutions of faith & governance will suffer an already deteriorating credibility. But I must

state (and even expose by publishing tapes) that, Mr.Appu the contract killer and his hooligans refer

to kanchi mutt as the ‘Parliament’ on account of the fact several VVIP’s used to have their

conclaves there, and it may not be out of place to see even sitting union ministers of 2015-16bowing and sitting in darshan of the prime accused, who is still an under-trial. What is now

significant however is the role of the so-called parliament in deciding as to who makes it to

the judgeships of Madras high Court, since almost ALL those who aided them in the

telephonic transcript leak case which was probed by the cyber-crime cell, have been

recommended for elevation as High court judges. It is this criminalization of the bar and

bench (including prosecutorial-criminal nexus) at the altar of the clergy, that I am most

concerned about.

34) As soon as the brahminical quintette got rid of the writ petition seeking a disclosure of the

cyber-crime police report to be dismissed illegally, PN.Prakash and the quintette began their

sinister game of revenge. On 4.8.15, in Crl OP No 30502/14, in which my junior is the counselon record, PN.Prakash, deliberately pulled him up so as extract revenge upon me. This was a

case in which, a group belonging to a minority was attacked by a group of landgrabbers (who

had occupied their lands) in a village in Villupuram district. As soon as the injured victims got

admitted in hospital, the police brought the landgrabbers, (by applying red colour liquid (to

feign blood) on their own clothes) and admitted them also to the hospital. Police received a

complaint from the attackers branding the victims as aggressors and registered their case

and assigned it an earlier crime number. They organized the Public Prosecutor of Villupuram

namely Shri.PonSiva to move an anticipatory bail petition for the victims, and it was filed in

the name of the PP’s junior, even without a single signature of any of the 7 petitioner’s. Even

the details of the petitioner’s such as age, etc were wrongly mentioned. At the hearing

(as deciphered by the eventual court order), the PP claimed that all the petitioner’s were minor’s,

and that the injured were discharged from hospital. The sessions judge who granted

anticipatory bail observed that although discharge from hospital does not warrant

anticipatory bail, he was still granting anticipatory bail. The PP’s junior confronted the victims

with the bail (AB) order, and made them to surrender to comply with the conditions. Hence

my junior moved a petition (Crl OP) U/s 482 CrPC, seeking action for filing an anticipatory bail

petition without the knowledge of the petitioner’s. He sought action against the police, the

PP as well as the District Judge for these actions (impersonation, misrepresentation, forgery,

fraud, conflict of interest, etc) and the Crl OP was pending for nearly a year. As for the court

order, it was brought was brought to our knowledge that the District Judge does NOT pass

orders, but uses a printed form, wherein his staff fill up the sections of law, and cause

title. That is how the order contained the statement regarding the minority (age) of the

petitioners, and discharge of victims has come about. The District judge had passed

hundreds and possibly thousands of such orders, without even adverting to the facts of each

case, or the arguments thereupon.

35) But, PN.Prakash started bullying my junior Shri.Mathan Kumar, and instead of taking action

against the District Judge and PP, prakash suo motu impleaded the junior of the PP

Shri.PonSiva, and secured an affidavit from him stating that he is a puritan etc. He also

bullied a high court staffer and secured a letter from him, stating that my junior hadthreatened him to number this case.


10/21

10 | P a g e

10 | P a g e

36) PN.Prakash called the illiterate petitioner Smt.Lakshmi and bullied her in open court, asking

her whether she wanted her bail to be cancelled, and whether she wanted to go to jail. All

these atrocities of PN.Prakash were time and again reported in writing to Chief Justice

Sanjay kaul, who kept promising that he would take action. Finally PN.Prakash passed an

order directing the bar council to take action against me and my junior for impleading theDistrict judge, and claimed that we wanted to keep a Damocles sword over his head, as he

was due for retirement etc. He also directed initiation of a suo motu criminal contempt

against us. PN Prakash went to the extent of quoting the intimidatory orders passed vis-à-vis

Padma’s petition in the Sankararaman murder case. In fact during the hearing I exposed the

fact that due to such practices of the PP, even orders of the Supreme Court were forged as if

the Supreme Court had granted bail to convicts, and these FAKE-BAIL orders were used to

secure convicts out of Cuddalore jail. I also pointed out that, even after exposing these

frauds, although criminal cases were registered for forgery of the Supreme Court orders, no

action was taken, leading to continuance of such practices in bail matters. Thus, criminals

have been hopping in and out of jail on forged orders including those of the Supreme Court.But PN.Prakash cunningly ignored all these aspects and had his revenge, damaging the

institutions of the judiciary beyond repair, with his fanciful and imaginary theories, instead of

ensuring that bail petitions are heard and decided properly instead of using printed forms to

pass orders. Any other judge would have taken action for forgery, fraud, impersonation,

committed by the PP and the cops, especially for filing a bail petition without the knowledge

of the petitioners. But Prakash avenged even the illiterate petitioner by cancelling her bail,

which she had never sought in the first place.

37) This was followed by another case (

C.C.No.10717/2001, ACMM, Egmore), wherein the APP (Addl

Public Prosecutor) of the ACMM court Egmore, had dispensed with 83 witnesses in a case ofcheating involving a sum of Rs. 1.67 crores, collected from 87 persons. After examining 4

persons and settling their money, the APP and the judge closed the evidence and acquitted

the accused. Action was directed to be taken against the APP, but the judge was let off

because, he had retired. Similarly, in a case involving several hundreds of crores of rupees,

looted by one Vijayalakshmi & Rajendran of Udumalpet, with the connivance of the local

police, one Nachimuthu who lost 90 lakhs to the duo for a loan under a fictitious SC/ST

scheme, a case was registered in Cr No 35/13 of DCB Tiruppur. The accused was arrested, but

they were let-off on default bail, and not a penny was recovered. Several hundreds of people

were fooled due to police connivance, and when petitions were filed seeking transfer of

investigation, the public prosecutor Shanmugavelayudham,

(A) Not only declined to place the case diary before the court, as usual,

(B) He also fixed a criminal to negotiate with the victims and attempted to influence

the counsel through a criminal.

(C) He also filed a FALSE counter-affidavit by contacting a sub-ordinate official who

was not a party to the case, and the police-PP team prevented the recovery of case

properties, as well as,

(D) Concealed the complaints of hundreds of other victims.

(E) And also influenced the petitioner (through the respondent) to amend the prayer.

38) On 27.7.15, when I highlighted these aspects, and sought directions for a proper probe,

besides cancellation of bail granted to the accused, PN.Prakash, instead of probing the

veracity of the allegations, claimed that “my office” was consistently making such allegations

and directed the bar council to initiate disciplinary action against the counsel on record as

well as myself. By dismissing the petition on this score, PN.Prakash not only helped his good

friend Shanmugavelayutham (who had earlier helped him out in the Sankararaman murder case ), but

also helped the accused to continue their loot of hundreds of crores. Not a word is uttered in

the judgment in Crl OP 28306/14, about what was argued, what was the response and so on.

Similarly not a word is uttered about the petition in Crl OP No 7278/15 being a bail

cancellation petition, except the prayer which was reproduced in the preamble to the order.


11/21

11 | P a g e

11 | P a g e

39) On the same day, in another petition bearing Crl OP No 27169/14, wherein implementation

of the Constitution Bench judgment of the Supreme Court (vis-à-vis registration of FIR’s) was

sought, PN.Prakash claimed that the bar council rules were violated since we had averred

that “The PP Sh.Shanmugavelayudham is duty-bound to place the entire records relating to

this case before the Hon’ble court and cannot in his usual style avoid such placement in

defiance of the constitutional authority of this court”. Citing this as illegal, PN.Prakash

directed the bar council to institute disciplinary action against another lawyer called Vinoth,

by claiming that he was my junior, and that I have been consistently making such allegations.

Not a word is uttered in the judgment about what was argued in court, in this case also.

40) On 14.8.15, PN.Prakash took up a set of 4 cases, pertaining to a TV journalist called

Panimalar, who was reportedly beaten up by her sister-in-law, who is also a TV news reader

cum part-time advocate. The incident happened in a mall, and it was alleged that the part-

time lawyer intimidated judges to get bail etc. A series of allegations were leveled against

various persons including a judge called CT.Selvam, law-officers (of failing to act on a complaint of

obscenity depicting the Chief Minister), etc. The charges ranged from illegally usurping cases

assigned to other judges and favouring DMK persons including Ms.Kanimoli, (daughter of DMK

chief Mr.Karunanidhi) in the 2G case, connivance with a school dropout who claims to be an Addl

Director General, and involving this fellow in police investigations, etc. The allegations also

included theft of High Court records, forgery, fabrication, illegal access of mobile call records,

etc. No action was taken by the vigilance cell despite repeated complaints. Since allegations

were leveled against individuals, they were impleaded as parties so as to ensure that they

are offered a fair opportunity to defend themselves. But PN.Prakash not only directed the

bar council to institute disciplinary action, but also instituted criminal contempt proceedings,

once again without any rhyme or reason, solely on the ground that the PP, the AG & the

judge were impleaded as parties.

41) In yet another case in Crl OP No 6140/14, wherein the issue of “FAKE-COURTS” & “FAKE-

JUDGES” was directed by the Supreme Court, to be heard by the Madras High Court,

PN.Prakash without uttering a single word about what transpired in court, simply dismissed

the petition, stating that there were only “GENERAL ALLEGATIONS” and dismissed the

petition on 27.8.15. This despite the pleading running into 17 pages, and 20

advertisements for “FAKE-COURTS”, 11 “FAKE-JUDGMENTS” & 7 complaints from victims,

besides notices, appeals, etc, totaling 160 pages, having been filed. So, it is clear that both

the Supreme Court as well as the High court is least interested in “FAKE-COURTS” being runin this country, despite these courts claiming jurisdiction as being recognized by the

Government of India, and using sitting judges of the High court and even elderly former

judges of the Supreme Court and CJI as patrons, etc to gain legitimacy. In fact, photos of

former CJI Shri.PN.Bhagwati, & Justices Mohan, Tarun Chatterjee of the Supreme Court,

etc, were widely disseminated as patrons, to fool people into trusting these organizations.

PN.Prakash did not even have jurisdiction to hear the matter, since petitions in the nature of

Public Interest ought to be heard by a Division Bench, as per the rules of the court.

42) Lastly, in a case of alleged abduction and forcible bigamous marriage of the wife of one

Kumaresan, in Crl OP 28307/14, certain allegations were leveled against a woman inspectorMs.Geetha, regarding disobeyal of the Constitution Bench judgment of Supreme Court

vis-à-vis registration of FIR’s. The said Geetha reported in writing to the court that she had

conducted enquiry with the abductee (who is in France) over phone, and that the addresses

on the marriage certificates etc, are false. Shamelessly PN.Prakash ignored the fact that the

constitution bench judgment was violated even when he is seized of the matter, and also the

laughable fact that inspector Geetha examined an alleged abductee over phone. In this case

also, not a single word is uttered vis-à-vis arguments which took place in court, on either

side. He has extracted portions of the police reply, incorporated them in the judgment and

thrown out the petition. This was on 27.8.15.


12/21

12 | P a g e

12 | P a g e

43) In toto, as between 27.7.15 & 27.8.15, within a span of 1 month, PN.Prakash took up as

many as 6 cases, and instituted 2 criminal contempt proceedings and issued 4 directions to

the bar council to initiate disciplinary proceedings against me and my junior. In none of them

have arguments been recorded, or reasons assigned. Moreover in all these cases, he quotes

the observations made in the Sankararaman case bribe-tapes judgment, in which case, he

was my opposing counsel.

44) This was followed-up by a series of criminal contempt cases against any and every advocate

who dared to speak-up against corruption. 5 advocates of the Rameswaram bar had lodged a

vigilance complaint against their Judicial Magistrate, Mr.GN.SaravanaKumar, for notorious

corruption, alleging that between 10.6.14 to 6.12.14, he had without any admission petition

or appearance of accused, collected huge fine amounts, and embezzled them without issuing

receipt or accounting-for the money. In fact the judgments contain conviction details of the

FINE amount, as well as the receipt number for payment of fine, clearly pointing that the

judgments were fabricated, after collection of the fines.

45) But, instead of instituting a surprise check on the court, Sanjay Kaul and company instituted

criminal contempt proceedings against the complainant-advocates, without even informing

them of the charges under which they were proposed to be tried, and coerced them through

their stooge, Shri.Paul Kanagaraj (former President of the bar-MHAA) to file an affidavit of apology

and dropped the matter, solely to shield the corrupt magistrate. The said SaravanaKumar,

another eccentric fellow, had gone to the extent of seating pick-pockets & petty-criminals

who appear before him, in the seats meant for advocates, and these incidents are

documented on video.

46) Similarly when members of the Madurai bar went on a procession against judicial corruptionin Madurai town, their leaders namely AK.Ramasamy & Dharmarajan were summoned to the

principal bench at Chennai for alleged criminal contempt, where Chennai advocates led by

Shri.NGR.Prasad, and hundreds of others joined the protests. Instead of informing them what

they were charged-with, the bench comprising CT.Selvam and Tamilvanan (of the fake doctorate

fame) intimidated Ramasamy by questioning him about his alleged insolvency. Tamilvanan

tried to polarize the issue by getting a few fake-advocates belonging to a particular caste-

group to implead as intervenor’s and even ordered police protection to them. When the

state police declined to declined to provide protection on account of their criminal activities

& antecedents, they were threatened with contempt and an affidavit of apology was

obtained from an IGP. Thus criminals are now roaming the streets and conducting theirtrade in crime, with police guard.

47) Eventually after the bar leaders refused to apologise and demanded trial, a hearing was held

expending lakhs of rupees with giant TV screens installed in the court premises and telecast

live when the bench made a shameful recommendation namely “TEMPORARILY SHUTTING

DOWN THE MADURAI BENCH”. This goes to show that Sanjay Kaul is unable to run a small

bench of the High Court properly. If taken seriously, this means that there is a total

breakdown of the constitutional machinery. However the fact remains that a protest against

corruption was attempted to be avenged using the Contempt of Courts Act as an

intimidatory tool, which however failed.

48) Hence they (brahminical quintette comprising Sanjay Kaul, Sathish Agnihotri, Ramasubramaniam,

PN.Prakash & Vaidyanathan) evolved a new tool, by tying-up with the criminals namely

Prabakaran & Selvam, and got them to abuse their offices at the bar council by suspending

me and my junior, in what was euphemistically styled as a prohibitory order, restraining us

from practicing in any court of law, and gave wide publicity by issuing a press release and

intimating all court departments across the state. This was done knowing that it has no

sanction in law, both statutory and otherwise, and despite the Supreme Court clearly ruling

against such practice vide its judgment in (1998) 4 SCC 499. In other words Sanjay Kaul & his

brahmin company cares a damn for the Supreme Court of India, its wisdom, or supremacyunder the Constitution.


13/21

13 | P a g e

13 | P a g e

49) My suspension was immediately followed by the suspension of 14 advocates by the Bar

Council of India without any stated reason. All of them had protested corruption and taken

out a rally in Madurai city. But out of the 1000 odd lawyers, only 14 were chosen for

suspension, solely because several of them were instrumental in a series of litigations against

Prabakaran and his FAKE-ADVOCATE, FAKE-LAW-COLLEGE menace. Most interestingly,

pursuant to these suspensions, Sanjay Kaul snatched-away all these litigations vis-à-vis FAKE-ADVOCATES, pending in the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, and kept it in cold storage

in the principal bench at Chennai. In fact in one case, one of the few partly conscientious

judges of the Madras High Court called Mr.Kirubakaran had issued certain directions vis-à-vis

the rot in the bar councils. But Sanjay Kaul exercised the appellate jurisdiction of the

Supreme Court and stayed the order, at the bidding of Prabakaran & his partners in crime -

Yet another usurpation of the Supreme Court.

50) This was followed by suspensions of 10 more lawyers for protesting the non-implementation

of tamil as a court language. The fanatic Sanjay Kaul, retaliated by teaching ‘tamils’ a lesson

or two, and brought in the CISF (hindi-speakers) under the guise of security, so as to

reportedly prevent ‘TAMILS’ from entering the High Court. Lastly, yet another set of lawyers’

numbering 8 were suspended for protesting against the deployment of CISF, in a campus

which saw police violence in 2009 including thrashing of several High Court judges.

Incidentally the brahmin quintette began using women as human shields, and ‘procured’

complaints’ from women to suspend these lawyers and institute multiple proceedings,

whereas the CISF personnel’s action which was originally protested was itself the

videographing of a woman lawyer. Judges’ of an independent India have stooped to such

pitiable levels of misusing women to achieve sinister designs. And this is not an isolated

incident, since there are precedents and repetitions of such claims, and victimization by the

Brahmin Taliban of the Madras High Court. Finally, the last set of 10 lawyers were suspended

for protesting inside the High Court campus when the contempt petition against the 2 bar

leaders was being heard. This protest was well documented on camera, and out of the 200

plus lawyers, Prabhakaran and Selvam singled out lawyers from Madurai most of whom were

again involved in litigations against his corrupt practices in the bar council especially vis-à-vis

permissions for fake law colleges and enrolment of FAKE-ADVOCATES. It is pertinent to

point-out that in all these cases, the leaders of the bar, were used as stooges to persuade

and deceive the affected lawyers into apologizing, etc. Shri.NGR.Prasad and several others

were intimidated into becoming turn-coats, with threat of suspension, since they were

themselves leaders of the protests and the same is well documented on multiple video clips.

Which Chief Justice other than Sanjay Kaul will shamelessly & schemingly leave-out theleader of a protest and suspend his followers, and then blackmail the leader into betraying

the followers ? In order to avoid fraternal in-fighting I don’t intend to release these videos

also in public domain, but shall produce them if required for enquiry.

51) Thus despite 44 lawyers being under illegal suspension in Tamilnadu for the past 5 months,

lawyers several FAKE-ADVOCATES who allegedly trespassed into the residence of the Chief

Justice Sanjay Kaul, and resorted-to, what is being termed as ‘indecent behaviour’, were not

suspended due to the nexus between Prabakaran, and Sanjay Kaul, and who were actually

attempting to grab land in a prime locality. Similarly Sanjay Kaul has awarded a free-run for

the FAKE-COURTS, FAKE-ADVOCATES, MURDERER-ADVOCATES, RAPIST-ADVOCATES,

EXTORTION-ADVOCATES, RACKETEER-ADVOCATES, and so on and so forth, not only

indirectly, but by direct participation in functions hosted by them, with titanic garlands, gifts,

etc. Even the most notorious bandits of contemporary India such as Sandalwood Veerappan

or Phoolan Devi could not command such privileges, from their followers. Till today, these

lawyers are looting the nation, with the blessings of Sanjay Kaul and the Brahmin quintette of

Ramasubramanian, PN.Prakash, etc, and their partners Prabakaran and Selvam. Justice

Nagamuthu, the pet shop boy of Sanjay Kaul quashed even attempt to murder cases against

the Prabakaran-Selvam duo by compounding them, notwithstanding that even the Registrar

General of the High Court had lodged those complaints. Not one judge outside of Tamilnadu

is capable of such unconscionable act, and no Chief Justice would dare to betray his Registrar

General if he was beaten-up in his chamber, by thugs & fake-advocates.


14/21

14 | P a g e

14 | P a g e

52) The Brahmin quintette’s aim is to convert the Madras High Court into a brahmin court, in

which they have already succeeded, and to throw-out non-brahmins, from the judiciary. You

may evaluate their judicial orders, and not one of them would be based on reason. It is the

caste of the lawyer or the party which determines who wins the case. You will find the

strangest of reasonings (whenever reasons are given) which no common man can even

imagine of. Even the proceedings against the accused, who were secured aboard the

‘FLOATING-ARMOURY’ MV SEAMAN OHIO, comprising 35 crew, 35 fire-arms, 102 magazines

and 5682 ammunition was quashed by PN.Prakash, only to be overturned by the Supreme

Court. All cases of crimes committed by lawyers and all categories of heinous offences

committed by the rich and famous are quashed by PN.Prakash, whenever Paul Kanagaraj or

when any brahmin lawyer appears for the accused. The Supreme Court has no say in these

things, and nobody cares for orders of the Supreme court. Similarly the state authorities do

not care about the orders of the High Court due to the scant respect commanded by these

crooks, and Madras High Court leads the world in the number of contempt of court cases.

53) When I challenged my suspension, citing the law laid down by the Constitution Bench of the

Supreme Court in (1998) 4 SCC 409, Shri.Sathish Agnihotri and another judge called

Sasidharan whom I had held in very high esteem, were coerced into manipulating the

Constitution Bench judgment of the Supreme Court, and quoted an obiter therein and that

too devoid of any ratio, to deny revocation of suspension. In other words, Sanjay Kaul’s styleis to use the same weapon possessed by the opponent to defeat him through treachery and

deceit. No judge would shamelessly avoid the operative part of a Constitution bench

judgment (which was extracted by me in the written arguments) and extract an obiter from the same

to deny relief.

54) This is not the first time that this is happening. The Madras High Court had earlier passed a

judicial order excluding itself from the RTI. This is because of fabrication of records which the

High Court does NOT want to share, with the public, since it is the crime-centre of the state.

Several cases are decided on fabricated records, and once the task of securing orders is

completed the court records are destroyed without due orders for destruction. To that

extent, the order in the above case dated 3.11.15 in Sub- Application 828/15 in suo motu

contempt petition 1834/15 is yet to be issued to me, so as to prevent me from moving the

Supreme Court, whereas Sasidaran leaked the orders to various journalists from his chamber

e-mail Id, maintained by his PA.

55) This organized criminalization of the bench is not a solitary event. To give an example, when

the lottery baron called Martin was hounded by the Tamilnadu police, his brother-in-law who

was in hiding approached me stating that the Tamilnadu police was extorting him. Initially I

secured anticipatory bail, but the police could not digest it, and wanted to prevent him from

complying with the bail conditions. The IG who was the chief extortionist was stung and

caught on camera, and placed under suspension. However, when I moved a petition for

extension of time/relaxation of bail (I am unable to recollect) it was noticed that someone

else had already filed it in my case. So I was prevented from moving it, and resulted in a

deadlock. Enquiries revealed that a FAKE-ADVOCATE had done the mischief. When I lodged a

complaint in this regard I was informed that the then Chief Justice had directed

Mr.Nagamuthu, to conduct an enquiry and submit a report. But Nagamuthu was reportedly

silenced by unknown persons, and no action was taken.


15/21

15 | P a g e

15 | P a g e

56) This is not all. I am told that several life convicts, who had managed to come out on bail

pending disposal of their appeals, used to prevent the High Court orders from reaching the

police, in the event of the appeal failing. It is not known as to how many such convicts are

roaming free in the country. These stray incidents are only the tip of the ice-berg, and it

would require reams and reams of paper to disclose the real picture. However I shall co-

operate with any inquiry, with all the materials, I place proof of the aforementioned claims.

The purpose of narrating the official and personal misconduct of various judges’ is not to

expose or shame them, but to make you realise the quality of the people whom you are

recommending and appointing as judges, especially vis-à-vis the Madras High Court, and to

prevent a repeat of such characters. Even as early as 2011, I rejected a request to sue

Sudhakar and his wife for a series of charges such as cheating, cheque-fraud and the like, all

because I was under a misconception that Sudhakar is incapable of such things. But now I

regret the said decision, as well as my inability to help the victims, based on an incorrect

assessment of Sudhakar’s character.

57) In so far as the Cyber-Crime report vis-à-vis the Sankararaman murder case is concerned, Imust add that it is a matter of record that the Tamilnadu Public Prosecutor

Mr.Shanmugavelayutham (Shunmugavelayutham) interfered in the Sankararaman murder

case at the behest of the accused, by deploying his sub-ordinate Mr.Maharaja to appear in

the Madras High Court on behalf of the prosecution, which was transferred out of Tamilnadu

and being conducted by the Puduchery government. When this contempt for orders of the

Supreme Court was pointed-out in writing, Shanmugavelayutham had the audacity to admit

that he took instructions from the CBCID DSP Mr.Veeramani to make submissions before the

High Court. Similarly, the Puduchery Public Prosecutor had written to me stating that the

Puduchery government has NOTHING to do with this case. So in effect, although the

Supreme Court had transferred the Sankararaman murder case to Puduchery, and although

the Supreme Court had issued a separate judgment stating that only Puduchery governmentshould prosecute the case, it is abundantly clear that it was the Tamilnadu government and

its prosecutors, who handled the case in connivance with defence counsel such as

PN.Prakash. That is why the prosecution intimidated all the witnesses including the family

members of the deceased, and all their complaints to the DGP etc, were ignored, in order to

make them turn hostile in the trial. The victims of crime were intimidated into silence, and

even the Governor of Pondicherry, who sanctioned the filing of an appeal against the

acquittal was thrown-out overnight. PN.Prakash still had a formidable difficulty to overcome.

Prior to the murder of Sankararaman, an attempt was made on the life of an auditor called

Mr.Radhakrishnan, believing that the expose’s against the mutt were being done by the said

Radhakrishnan. This case remained undetected, till investigators stumbled upon the truth

while investigating the Sankararaman murder. This attempt to murder trial is still underway

in the Additional Sessions Court in Chennai, and they needed to overcome the same as well.

58) It must be borne in mind that all prosecutorial appointments including the present PP

Shanmugavelayutham, were rubber-stamped appointments, and even the appointment

manual of PP’s is unavailable with the High court, which is to approve such appointments. It

is these very same PP’s who decide who are the PP’s for the other courts in the state and

rampant corruption and influence-peddling determines who become law officers, and the

High Court remains a mere post of fice. Resultantly PP’s flourish in murder cases, economic

offences and the like, and give NO-OBJECTIONS even in minor girl rape-cum-murder cases. It

is well documented that Judges’ simply record these statements of PP’s & let out criminals

on bail. But, when people and lawyer’s lamented and wrote to Sanjay Kaul, met him

desperately etc, the anti-people, pro-criminal, and mafia-friendly Chief Justice Sanjay Kaul,ignored all such pleas, and permitted crimes and criminals to flourish. Examples abound, and

am consciously not listing them out for the sake of paucity, and witness-safety, but shall

furnish them during the enquiry. Similarly, with most of the judges having been elevated

from practice at the bar, ‘FIXING-JUDGES’, is rampant, and in bail petitions, successive bail

petitions are filed before different judges, with PP’s being paid-off, not to object, even in

minor girl sexual offences, and let-off on bail, with a conducive judge playing ball, after

suppressing the pendency of other bail petitions, in the same court. These other petitions are

withdrawn once bail is secured from a ‘FIXED-JUDGE’. Even if there is still difficulty in getting

bail, the affluent ones can approach Sanjay Kaul’s favourites such as Shri.RC.Paul Kanagaraj

(A Narcotics lawyer & Ex-President of the HC bar) or the quack Prabakaran, who can go to

the extent of taking their bands of thugs, to the judge concerned, bully the judge to pass

orders, or even abduct remand prisoners from police vans parked inside the court campus.


16/21

16 | P a g e

16 | P a g e

59) Spitting on judges, assaulting judges, etc are rampant, so much so that as had been earlier

pointed-out, Prabakaran’s goons besieged the residence of Sanjay Kaul himself and

reportedly misbehaved with the inmates, pillaged the place, etc. While these activities

pertain to criminal matters, when it comes to education, most of the judges’ wield influence

with institutions, and favour unrecognized or errant institutions, so much so that Sanjay Kaul

threw out a PIL wherein it was alleged that a college had no infrastructure whatsoever.

However 3 teenage girls were murdered in the said institution for protesting the lack ofinfrastructure, and the said college has now been sealed about a week ago. In any

investigation of this nature, Sanjay Kaul should have been added as an abettor-accused, but

for his official stature and legal technicalities he has not been so added. The same is the case

with another marine institution wherein Mr.Devadass a judge refused to come to the rescue

of a student who was ragged and brutalized, and fighting for his life, allegedly because a film-

star belonging to Devadass’ caste was the benamidar of the institution. Later, when the

matter came-up before PN.Prakash, he pulled-up the same PP Shanmugavelayudham for

registering an FIR upon the victim’s complaint, and misbehaved claiming that everyone is

afraid of me, etc. Similarly when a quack hotel management institution exploited students’

with FALSE claims, and devoid of infrastructure, leading to the death of a student.

PN.Prakash threw out documented proof of fraud, so as to aid the criminals, to loot more

people. It must be recalled that all these things continue to happen in Tamilnadu, despite the

DD medical college scam, wherein over 100 students were deceived, when a known cheat in

the education sector issued full page ads claiming to run a 6000 crore medical college, and

collected huge sums for an MBBS course, even without a college. Everyone stayed mum and

eventually hundreds of students and parent who lost lakhs of rupees ended-up on the

streets, and the high court wasted not man-hours or man-days, but months of court-time

adjudicating these issues. Yet High Court judges continue to partake in functions organized

by educational institutions and the resulting nexus leads to issuance of judicial orders in

favor of fake institutions, leading to students being killed, quite literally. As already

mentioned, it is impossible to list out each case in this brief petition, but I shall furnish the

specifics during enquiry. Furthermore, huge crime-empires are patronized by the leaders of

the bar, such as Ex-President Paul Kanagaraj, Prabakaran etc, and bands of advocates (fake &genuine), so much so that most of the property disputes are handled by them, including

khap-panchayat, intimidation, extortion, and possession etc. It is only disputes with lesser

value, that are heard and adjudicated by the Chennai City Civil Courts. It is in connection with

one such property dispute that Prabakaran’s boys ransacked Sanjay Kaul’s residence.

Similarly in connection with huge economic offences running into hundreds and thousands of

crores of rupees, these bands possess exclusive jurisdiction, from preventing and disbursing

hundreds of victims and driving them away from the police station, and threatening and

attacking them if they dare to enter court premises, and even preventing them from

instituting proceedings in the Madras High Court, the lawyer-gangs are well networked so

much so that even Sanjay Kaul is influenced to resort to silly habits such as preventing victims

from approaching the High Court, through the Registrar General of the Madras High Courtnamely Kalayarasan, the author of the date of birth malpractice cum 20-crore bribe

intermediary in the Sankararaman murder acquittal. In every case involving hundreds of

crores and thousands of crores, these lawyers are not only indirectly involved, but they

themselves sit personally and operate the institution which commits the fraud. In other

words, most of these are operated by lawyers, and eventually when the bubble bursts they

obtain immunity not only because they are lawyers but by sheer mob-strength. The irony

remains that even in cases of paedophily and minor rapes, etc, despite the orders of

successive CJI’s Sanjay Kaul and company have ensured a system of concealment of cases,

and indefinite non-listing of rape cases in particular through the Registrar General

Kalaiyarasan, so much so that even applications for certified copies of records are invariably

denied, because some influential lawyer is appearing for the accused, and is able to fend-off

such procurement of records, by sheer face-value. Sanjay Kaul’s connivance with crime and

criminals knows no bounds. For instance in a land matter valued at around 600 crores, the

trial judge was accused of issuing 4 different varieties of judgments for the same case, and

one was even issued prior to the issuance of the official copy to none less than the defendant

who happens to be a defendant. Alleging that this judgment was not only “FIXED”, but also

“ghost-written”, a vigilance inquiry was held. But the land-grabbers managed to influence

Kaul and his administration, so much so that although the records were shown to the

complainant, the court declined to issue copies under RTI. This was found fault with by the

CIC, and when directed to issue copies, Kaul’s sub-ordinates’ moved Kaul’s bench in violation

of the roster, and inspite of no STAY being granted, they lied to the CIC that there was a

STAY. Verification reveals that Kaul’s men somehow got a STAY later on, so as to protect the

land-grabbers. No other judge, leave alone a Chief Justice can stoop to such low levels as tofabricate a STAY order, where none existed.


17/21

17 | P a g e

17 | P a g e

60) That is not the end of the story. While property matters, and economic offences in Chennai

city are monopolized and decided by gangs of lawyers and quacks belonging to the ranks of

Paul Kanagaraj and Prabakaran, the crimes against the body such as attempts to murder etc

are exclusively patronized by quashing them whenever Paul Kanagaraj or Prabakaran is

approached. Serial offenders, secure affidavits from victims, either forged or by coercion,

and secure quashments through PN.Prakash, who shamelessly secures money from the

hands of hooligans and pays it to victims not even in chambers, but in open court, and incash. Mortals facing lesser and even cooked-up charges have to struggle their way through

the maze of the judicial grind from magistracy to supreme court, hoping to see some light.

The frauds and malpractices thus galore, from MLM’s to Mines and minerals, the Madras

High Court is a den of criminals, so much so that if it is shut down for a year, the crime rate in

the state would drop by 90 percent. As already stated, when several of these aspects were

analysed at length and directions were issued for reform of the bar councils etc, Sanjay Kaul

exercised the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction, and stayed them since it affected their

equations and economy. In fact the findings were based not only due to involvement of the

leaders of the bar in crime syndicates, but also due to the pumping of such ill-gotten wealth

in the bar council elections etc. A perusal of the telephone logs of Sanjay Kaul,

Ramasubramaniam and PN.Prakash would expose the nexus with the criminal-lawyers.

61) That, Sanjay Kaul is incapable of writing a judgment of a few pages, can be seen from the

judgments rendered by him in the past over one year. 99 per cent of his orders are less than

a single page in length, and almost all of them would be an abdication of duty rather than the

performance of a judicial function. He is such an indifferent person, that if you send someone

to observe him perform in open court, he would notice that even adjournment dates are

determined by his court clerk, and the clerk has the final word. In a building collapse case, at

a place called Mugalivakkam, Sanjay Kaul is yet to decide the case, after hearing it for over a

year, despite over 100 people dying in the illegal construction on a water-body. Similarly,

PIL’s in sensitive matters such as Indian fishermen being shot and killed by the hundreds

Koodankulam nuclear plant, etc are concealed from being listed for hearing, and without

admission (viz being listed even once) for years together, so as to please brahminsentiments. The nexus with his partners can be seen from the following criminal antecedents

of the bar leaders, with whom he poses & receives Himalayan garlands.

CRIMINAL CASES AGAINST Co-CHAIRMAN BCI Mr.PRABAKARAN

(1) B2 PS, Cr No 115/07, U/s 147, 341 IPC,

(2) B-4 PS Cr No 12/06, U/s 143, 147, 188 IPC, - Complaint of Justice Shri.M.Venugopal (thenRegistrar General) who was attacked in his office by Prabakaran & Co.

(3) B-4 PS Cr No 26/04, u/s 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 307, 506(ii) IPC, - ATTEMPT TO MURDER,inside the High Court Premises – 3 DEADLY Weapons Seized & Accused caught RED-HANDED.

(4) B-4 P.S. Cr No 16/04 u/s 147, 323, 341 IPC,

(5) PRC.No.142/04, u/s 7 r/w 25(1-B) Arms Act.

(6) DGP office report dated 7/6/13 – For ransacking the Tamilnadu DGP’s office.

CRIMINAL CASES AGAINST CHAIRMAN BCT Mr.D.SELVAM

(1) B-4 PS Cr No 26/04, u/s 147,148, 341, 323, 324, 307, 506(ii) IPC, - ATTEMPT TO MURDER, insidethe High Court Premises – 3 DEADLY Weapons Seized & Accused caught RED-HANDED.

(2) PRC.No.142/04, u/s 7 r/w 25(1-B) Arms Act.

(3) DGP office report dated 7/6/13 – For ransacking the Tamilnadu DGP’s office.

(4) B-2 P.S. Cr No 677/05 u/s 147, 323, 341, 427, 294(b) & 506(II) IPC, attacking the Bar CouncilSecretary Mr.Dakshinamurthy, and complaint secured from hospital bed.

62) The following is a tentative list of L&O offences involving advocates, which were published,

i. Advocate A.M.Mohan, an accused in 2 murder cases has been detained underthe Goonda's Act on 2.9.2015 for having murdered one Alwar on 25.7.2014 inTanjore and one Abineshababu on 30.7.2015 in Chengalput.

ii. Advocate Kalaiselvan, from Madurai and Advocate Muthiah, from Coimbatore,who are advocates committed triple murder on 27.8.2015 at ChintamanipudurSignal, in Coimbatore.

iii. Advocate C.Stalin, a lawyer was beaten to death by a rival group of Advocates after Egmore Bar Association elections in January 2015.

iv. Mr.Ranganathan, an Advocate, was murdered by another Advocate Pon-Muthuramalingam in Sivaganga Court Campus in daylight on 7.8.2015.


18/21

18 | P a g e

18 | P a g e

v. Advocate M.K.Raja, who himself was an accused in the murder of oneSelvakumar, was murdered by a gang near Kumbakonam, on 3.4.2015.

vi. S.Kamesh, an Advocate was shot down by his client and history sheeterEaswaran in conspiracy with one Advocate Selvam, near Maduranthakam on6.09.2015.

vii. Advocate Jamal Mohammed, was murdered on 7.9.2015 in a bar inChithayankottai, Dindigul.

viii. Advocate Sounder , was murdered by his friend who conducted Kangaroo Courtin a booze party on 28.08.2014 in Kilpauk, Chennai.

ix. Advocate Shanmugam, from Sankarapuram, who was an accused in fourcases including a murder case in Crime No.293/2012 Chinnaselam PoliceStation was murdered by a gang in Kallakurichi on 13.09.2014.

x. Advocate Muthu Durai, who was said to have murdered his clerk Shanmugam,was murdered on 08.08.2014 in Thiruppalai, Madurai.

xi. Mr.K.Tamil Anban was murdered in Thillai Nagar,

Criminalisation of the Judiciary

Documents

Transcript of Criminalisation of the Judiciary