CR 34 Presentation1 - New York State Department of ......Microsoft PowerPoint - CR 34...
22
James F. Craig, P.E. Ron Tiderencel, Otsego County C&S Engineers, Inc. Superintendent of Highways, 499 Col. Eileen Collinns Blvd. Forestry, and Parks Syracuse, NY 13212 Linden Ave. [email protected] Cooperstown, NY 13326 (607) 547-4268 [email protected] Synopsis: This presentation provides a look at a local bridge replacement project with many challenges. For 64 years, the traveling public in the Town of Maryland, Otsego County, NY had to negotiate a 90º turn at the Elk Creek crossing with an advisory posting of 10-mph on a 55-mph roadway. The bridge is located in an agricultural area outside of the Village of Schenevus. The Otsego County Highway Department determined that the construction of a new curved girder bridge on a curved roadway alignment was the most efficient solution. This solution provided the best means of improving driver safety and replacing the structurally deficient existing bridge, while allowing single stage construction by maintaining traffic on the existing highway alignment. The new roadway alignment, with a 195 meter radius, facilitated an improved advisory posting of 35-mph. The non-standard design criteria justification for not providing a 55-mph horizontal curve included the fact that a local farm would be eliminated and several local residences would no longer have access to CR 34 if a 55-mph curve was constructed. The site selected for the proposed curved CR 34 roadway and bridge presented physical, geometric, environmental and economic challenges. Notable features of the project include: • Major realignment of the existing roadway • Partial realignment of the existing stream • Curved girder superstructure with complex geometry • Precast concrete modular T-Wall ® Retaining Wall System • Innovative R-O-W acquisition and abandonment • Construction of a cattle pass for dairy farm operation The overall construction cost of the project was $2,000,000. The construction duration was 6 months and the project was completed in November 2003. SESSION 2.5 Replacement of CR 34 Bridge over Elk Creek, Town of Maryland
Transcript of CR 34 Presentation1 - New York State Department of ......Microsoft PowerPoint - CR 34...
James F. Craig, P.E. Ron Tiderencel, Otsego County
C&S Engineers, Inc. Superintendent of Highways, 499 Col. Eileen Collinns Blvd. Forestry, and Parks Syracuse, NY 13212 Linden Ave. [email protected] Cooperstown, NY 13326 (607) 547-4268 [email protected] Synopsis:
This presentation provides a look at a local bridge replacement project with many challenges. For 64 years, the traveling public in the Town of Maryland, Otsego County, NY had to negotiate a 90º turn at the Elk Creek crossing with an advisory posting of 10-mph on a 55-mph roadway. The bridge is located in an agricultural area outside of the Village of Schenevus. The Otsego County Highway Department determined that the construction of a new curved girder bridge on a curved roadway alignment was the most efficient solution. This solution provided the best means of improving driver safety and replacing the structurally deficient existing bridge, while allowing single stage construction by maintaining traffic on the existing highway alignment. The new roadway alignment, with a 195 meter radius, facilitated an improved advisory posting of 35-mph. The non-standard design criteria justification for not providing a 55-mph horizontal curve included the fact that a local farm would be eliminated and several local residences would no longer have access to CR 34 if a 55-mph curve was constructed. The site selected for the proposed curved CR 34 roadway and bridge presented physical, geometric, environmental and economic challenges. Notable features of the project include: • Major realignment of the existing roadway • Partial realignment of the existing stream • Curved girder superstructure with complex geometry • Precast concrete modular T-Wall ® Retaining Wall System • Innovative R-O-W acquisition and abandonment • Construction of a cattle pass for dairy farm operation The overall construction cost of the project was $2,000,000. The construction duration was 6 months and the project was completed in November 2003.
SESSION 2.5
Replacement of CR 34 Bridge over Elk Creek, Town of Maryland
About the Presenters:
The Otsego County Board of Representatives appointed Ronald P. Tiderencel Otsego County Superintendent of Highways on July 2, 2003. Ron graduated with honors from both Oneonta High School in 1979 and from Paul Smith’s College in 1981, with a degree in Forestry. He was formerly employed by the NYSDEC before coming to Otsego County in 1986. He was appointed Otsego County Deputy Superintendent of Highways in August of 1999 and was previously the Senior Engineering Aide. He is a member of Otsego County’s Traffic Safety Board, the Otsego County Town Superintendents Association and is responsible for over 477 miles of roads, 86 bridges, 3,335 acres of forest lands, and two parks. James Craig is currently a Senior Project Engineer with C&S. Jim received his Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Buffalo in 1993. Jim has been a design engineer/project manager on numerous LAFA, local and NYSDOT bridge projects over the past 9 years. Jim was the project manager and lead bridge engineer for the CR 34 over Elk Creek bridge replacement project. He is a member of ASCE and ABCD (Association for Bridge Construction and Design).
Presentation OutlinePresentation OutlineI.I. IntroductionIntroductionII.II. Existing Site FeaturesExisting Site FeaturesIII.III. Local Community ConsiderationsLocal Community ConsiderationsIV.IV. Balanced SolutionBalanced SolutionV.V. Unique Project FeaturesUnique Project FeaturesVI.VI. SummarySummary
Great Example of Great Example of ““LocalLocal”” Bridge ProjectBridge Project
•• Main ObjectiveMain Objective......
Share the Experiences of this Local ProjectShare the Experiences of this Local Project
Existing Site FeaturesExisting Site Features
•• Existing Bridge (1939)Existing Bridge (1939)•• Condition Rating = 4Condition Rating = 4•• Sufficiency Rating = 24.7Sufficiency Rating = 24.7
Existing Site FeaturesExisting Site Features
Steep Steep SlopeSlope
Existing Existing BridgeBridge
NN
•• AlignmentAlignment•• TopographyTopography
CR 34CR 34
CR 34CR 34
Existing Site FeaturesExisting Site Features
•• Dairy FarmDairy Farm
NNBarnBarn
CR 34CR 34
CR
34
CR
34CropsCrops
PasturePasture
PropertyProperty
Local Community ConsiderationsLocal Community Considerations
•• M & P of T for VehiclesM & P of T for Vehicles ……………………....
Balanced Project SolutionBalanced Project Solution
Design Design CriteriaCriteria
ImpactsImpacts
$$
55 MPH55 MPH35 MPH35 MPH
Balanced Project Solution, cont.Balanced Project Solution, cont.
Alignment AlternativesAlignment Alternatives
CROPSCROPS
FARMFARM
Balanced Project Solution, cont.Balanced Project Solution, cont.
Property AccessProperty Access
Old AbutmentOld AbutmentPropertyProperty
Old CR 34Old CR 34
Balanced Project Solution, cont.Balanced Project Solution, cont.
EnvironmentalEnvironmental
Elk CreekElk Creek
Old Gravel Old Gravel Bar LocationBar Location
Unique Project FeaturesUnique Project FeaturesBridge GeometryBridge Geometry
Curved / Skew / GradeCurved / Skew / Grade
113 feet113 feet98.5 feet98.5 feet
Unique Project FeaturesUnique Project FeaturesLarge Retaining WallLarge Retaining Wall
SoldierSoldierPile Pile WallWall
TiebackTieback
Unique Project FeaturesUnique Project FeaturesLarge Retaining WallLarge Retaining Wall
180 feet180 feet
Unique Project FeaturesUnique Project FeaturesCattle PassCattle Pass Like I’m gonna
fit through that thing!!
Unique Project FeaturesUnique Project FeaturesStream MitigationStream Mitigation
Point BarPoint Bar
Low Flow WeirLow Flow Weir
Unique Project FeaturesUnique Project FeaturesApproach Slab DetailApproach Slab Detail
Approach SlabApproach Slab
Project SummaryProject SummaryReview of Local IssuesReview of Local Issues
-- Improved SafetyImproved Safety-- Minimized Impact to Minimized Impact to
PropertiesProperties-- Accommodated Daily Accommodated Daily
Farm OperationFarm Operation
Value EngineeringValue Engineering-- CIP Piles vs. Steel HCIP Piles vs. Steel H--PilesPiles
-- Retaining WallRetaining Wall
Special Thanks:Special Thanks:
•• NYSDOTNYSDOT
•• FHWAFHWA
•• NYSCHSANYSCHSA
•• DELANEY CONST. DELANEY CONST. (photo credit)(photo credit)
Any Questions ?Any Questions ?
LetLet’’s Eat !!!!!s Eat !!!!!
![Presentation1.ppt [โหมดความเข้ากันได้] · Title: Microsoft PowerPoint - Presentation1.ppt [โหมดความเข้ากันได้]](https://static.fdocuments.us/doc/165x107/5ec776d210d7bd5f6f00774b/aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-title-microsoft-powerpoint.jpg)
