Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

28
Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2

description

Jurisdiction The authority of a court to hear and decide a specific action juris = “law” + diction = “to speak”. The “judicial power” or authority to act.

Transcript of Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Page 1: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Chapter 2

Page 2: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Judicial Review

• Judicial Review was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Marbury v. Madison (1803) where Chief Justice Marshall wrote:– “It is emphatically the province and duty

of the judiciary to say what the law is….”

Page 3: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Jurisdiction• The authority of a court to hear and decide a

specific action • juris = “law” + diction = “to speak”.• The “judicial power” or authority to act.

Page 4: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Personal Jurisdiction• Personal (or in personam) jurisdiction

primarily is based on geography.• Courts have personal jurisdiction over

persons residing and/or doing business within a particular county, district, or state.

Page 5: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Personal JurisdictionLong-Arm Statutes • nonresidents of a state • subject to courts in other state• based on “minimum contacts” See Case 3.1 (page 68)

Page 6: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Personal Jurisdiction• “Where” is business on the internet located?• “Sliding Scale Test”

• Substantial business conducted within state• Some interactivity • Passive advertising

Page 7: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Subject Matter Jurisdiction• The authority of a court to hear and decide

the particular dispute before it.• A court’s subject matter jurisdiction is

usually defined in the statute or constitution creating the court.

Page 8: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Subject Matter Jurisdiction• Limits to a trial court’s subject matter

jurisdiction:–The amount in controversy–The subject of the lawsuit–Whether the crime alleged is a

misdemeanor or felony

Page 9: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Subject Matter Jurisdiction• Concurrent Jurisdiction - When one or more

federal court and one or more state court have subject matter jurisdiction over the same dispute.

Page 10: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Jurisdiction of Federal Courts• Federal district courts have two types of

subject matter jurisdiction:–Federal question jurisdiction –Diversity jurisdiction

Page 11: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Jurisdiction of Federal Courts• Federal Question Jurisdiction

–Arises if a case involves an alleged violation of the U.S. Constitution, federal statute or regulation, or a treaty.

Page 12: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Jurisdiction of Federal Courts• Diversity Jurisdiction:

–The amount in controversy exceeds $75,000; and

–The lawsuit is between citizens of different states or citizens of a state and citizens of a foreign country.

Page 13: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Exclusive and Concurrent Jurisdiction

Page 14: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Structure of Federal Courts and Most State Court Systems

Supreme Court

Courts of Appeals

District Courts

Page 15: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Original Jurisdiction• The authority of a court to hear and decide a

dispute in the first instance.• Generally speaking, trial courts are courts

of original jurisdiction, although the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction over a few types of disputes.

Page 16: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Appellate Jurisdiction• The authority of a court to review a prior

decision in the same case made by another court.

• The decision is binding on that court and any court below it.

Page 17: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Appellate JurisdictionAppellate courts do not:

–have a witness stand–have a jury box–hear any new testimony– admit any new evidence

Page 18: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Appellate Jurisdiction• The party that loses before an intermediate

appellate court may appeal that court’s ruling to the jurisdiction’s supreme court or its equivalent.

• However, supreme court review is optional by the supreme court.

Page 19: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

U. S. Courts of Appeals and U. S. District Courts

Page 20: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Supreme Court Review

Supreme Court Review• Discretionary Review (Writ of Certiorari)• Rule of Four• Petitions Granted

Usually: -Important Constitutional Question-Conflict with other state or

federal decisions

Page 21: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Texas Court System

T e xa s S u pre m e Co u rtCIVIL CASES

T e xa s C ou r t o f C r im ina l A p pe a lsCRIM INAL CASES

L im ited Ju r isd ictionC o u r ts

S ta te T r ia l C ou r ts S ta te A g e nc ies

S ta te C o u r ts o f A p pe a lB o th C iv il & C rim in a l

Page 22: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Venue• Within a particular jurisdiction, the most

appropriate location for a trial to be held and from which a jury will be selected.

Page 23: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Standing to Sue

• StandingAn individual must have a legal and tangible stake in the controversy

• Justiciable controversyThe controversy must be actual (the courts will not decide a hypothetical situation)

Page 24: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Alternative Dispute Resolution• Alternative Dispute Resolution (or “ADR”)

is a variety of methods that seek to resolve disputes without resorting to a costly jury trial.

Page 25: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Alternative Dispute Resolution• Negotiation - between the parties directly,

with or without attorneys.

Page 26: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Alternative Dispute Resolution• Mediation - Non-binding procedure

utilizing the services of a neutral third party to assist negotiations.

Page 27: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Alternative Dispute Resolution• Arbitration - A binding form of mediation

utilizing either one person or a panel of persons chosen by the court or agreed to by the parties (or both).

Page 28: Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 2.

Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution

End of Chapter 2