Court Case File

8/6/2019 Court Case File

1/88

IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD. Civil Misc. Application No. 3618 of 2004 (Under Section 151 CPC)In

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. . 3618 of 2004 (Under Article 226 of constitution of India) (District Agra)

1. Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak. S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society, Aundh, Pune 411007 2. P. N. Oak. S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society, Aundh, Pune - 411007 ,Founder President, Institute of RewritingIndian History, Aundh, Pune 4110071-------------Petitioner

VERSUS

1. Union of India through Secretary,

Human Resources and Development (HRD),

Government of India, New Delhi.2. Secretary, Tourism and Archeological Department, Govt. of India, New Delhi3. Director General, Archaeological Survey of India,

Government of India, Janapath, New Delhi.---------RespondentsTo, The Honble the Chief Justice and his Lordships other companion Judges of theaforesaid Court. The humble writ petition of the abovenamed petitioner MOST RESPECTFULLYSHOWETH AS UNDER;

1. That the full facts and circumstance of the case are given in accompanied writpetition, it is most respectively prayed that an ad-interiem-mandamus by appointing

a facts finding committee for exposing the falsehood of the Arceaological departmentregarding the historical blunder committed by them in respect of their purported

claim set-up in declaring Taj-Mahal, Red- fort Agra, Fatahpur Sikiri and other

ancient Hindu buildings/ monuments as Muslim monuments and truth may be

disclosed to the public/citizens and students in subject of history regarding their true

authorship prior to Mughal period in furtherance of their fundamental rightsconferred to the Citizens under Article 19 (1) (a), 25 and 26 read with49 and 51-A(f)

(h) of Constitution of India and Freedom Of Information Act, 2002.

2. That it is further prayed that an ad-interim-Mandamus directing the respondentauthorities after due Scientific investigation and facts finding inquiry report, the

respondents in particular the Archaeological Survey of India may Declare and Notify


2/88

in terms of the true history, as the Taj Mahal was not built by Shahajahan and thereby

directing the Archaeological Survey of India to remove the notices displayed by

them in the Taj Mahal premises crediting Shahjahan as its creator and to futher desist

from writing / publishing / proclaiming / propagating and teaching about Shahjahan

being the author of Taj Mahal and stop and discontinue the free entry in Taj Mahal

premises on Fridays in the week.3. That it is further prayed that an ad-interim mandamus directing the respondent

authorities in particular Archaeological Survey of India 1)-to open the locks of upper

and lower portions of the 4 storeyed red stone building of Taj Mahal having numbers

of rooms, 2)-to remove all bricked up walls build later blocking such rooms therein,

3)-to investigate scientifically and certify that which of those or both cenotaphs arefake,4)-to look for a subterrance storey below the river bank ground level, 5)-to look

into after removing the room-entrance directly beneath the basement cenotaph-

chamber.6)- by removing the brick and lime barricade flocking the doorway, 7)-to

look for important historical evidence such as idols and inscriptions hidden inside

there by the Shahjahans orders as truth may not make us rich but the same willmake us free from superstitions and false propoganda.

4. That it is further prayed that an ad-interim-mandamus may further be issueddeclaring the provisions of The Ancient And Historical Monuments AndArchaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of National Importance) Act, 1951

to the extend of declaring the ancient and historical monuments and other and

Archaeological Sites namely Taj Mahal. Fatehpur-sikiri, Agra Red Ford ,Ethmadualla and other Monuments as built by Mugal invaders allegedly on the basisof report submitted by Then Governor General, Lord Auckland, and young lieutenant

Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme of Divide and Rule andthereby misusing the archaeological studies, be declared as ultravires to Article 19

(1) (a), 25,26 49 And 51-A (f) (h)constitution of India and this Honble Court may

futher declare the provision of Ancient and Historical Monuments andArchaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951

(71 of 1951), The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains Act,

1958 of declaring these ancient building/ monuments preserved with such falsegraeyards identity with out any scientific inquiry/ investigation as purported Mugalmonuments / graveyards as unconstitutional and void.

5. That it is further prayed that an ad-interim mandamus on the basis of the ResearchConducted by the petitioner No.-2 as published in the different books written by him

as referred in earlier paragraphs namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal

is a Temple Place, 3.Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers

Howlers, 5. Learning Vedic Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World

History, 7. Agra red Fort is a Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land,

9. The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a Shiva Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was


3/88

Great, 11. Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty, Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12.

Islamic Havoc in Indian History Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN 2, B.

D. Chambers, 10/54 D. B. Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 , and the

truth may be exposed through Scientific inventions and temperaments to the Citizen/

Students of history by conducting the research/ excavations of the remains of Hindu

monuments by the Central Government surroundings to all such Hindu Palace/

temple and other ancient archaeological building/ Monuments as the incidents like

demolition of disputed structure at Ayodhya may not be repeated resulting in mass

destruction of the public property shacking of public confidence under Rule Of Law

in the society; Or and Any other Direction, Which this Honble Court May deem fit

in the circumstances of the case

Prayer

It is most respectively prayed that an ad-interiem-mandamus byappointing a facts finding committee for exposing the falsehood of the Arceaological

department regarding the historical blunder committed by them in respect of their

purported claim set-up in declaring Taj-Mahal, Red- fort Agra, Fatahpur Sikiri and other

ancient Hindu buildings/ monuments as Muslim monuments and truth may be disclosed

to the public/citizens and students in subject of history regarding their true authorship

prior to Mughal period in furtherance of their fundamental rights conferred to theCitizens under Article 19 (1) (a), 25 and 26 read with49 and 51-A(f) (h) of Constitution of

India and Freedom Of Information Act, 2002.

1. It is further prayed that an ad-interim-Mandamus directing therespondent authorities after due Scientific investigation and facts finding inquiry

report, the respondents in particular the Archaeological Survey of India may Declare

and Notify in terms of the true history, as the Taj Mahal was not built by Shahajahan

and restrain them from displaying the authorship of these buildings as constructed by

Sahajahan or by any mughal Invaders thereby directing the Archaeological Survey of

India to remove the notices displayed by them in the Taj Mahal premises crediting

Shahjahan as its creator and to futher desist from writing / publishing / proclaiming /

propagating and teaching about Shahjahan being the author of Taj Mahal and stop

and discontinue the free entry in Taj Mahal premises on Fridays in the week.2. It is further prayed that an ad-interim mandamus directing the respondent

authorities in particular Archaeological Survey of India 1)-to open the locks of upper

and lower portions of the 4 storeyed red stone building of Taj Mahal having numbers

of rooms, 2)-to remove all bricked up walls build later blocking such rooms therein,

3)-to investigate scientifically and certify that which of those or both cenotaphs are

fake,4)-to look for a subterrance storey below the river bank ground level, 5)-to look

into after removing the room-entrance directly beneath the basement cenotaph-

chamber.6)- by removing the brick and lime barricade flocking the doorway, 7)-to


4/88

look for important historical evidence such as idols and inscriptions hidden inside

there by the Shahjahans orders as truth may not make us rich but the same willmake us free from superstitions and false propoganda.

3. It is further prayed that an ad-interim-mandamus may further be issueddeclaring the provisions of The Ancient And Historical Monuments And

Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of National Importance) Act, 1951

to the extend of declaring the ancient and historical monuments and other and

Archaeological Sites namely Taj Mahal. Fatehpur-sikiri, Agra Red Ford,

Ethmadualla and other Monuments as built by Mugal invaders allegedly on the basis

of report submitted by Then Governor General, Lord Auckland, and young lieutenant

Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme of Divide and Rule andthereby misusing the archaeological studies, be declared as ultravires to Article 19

(1) (a), 25,26 49 And 51-A (f) (h)constitution of India and this Honble Court may

futher declare the provision of Ancient and Historical Monuments andArchaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951

(71 of 1951), The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains Act,

1958 of declaring these ancient building/ monuments preserved with such falsegraeyards identity with out any scientific inquiry/ investigation as purported Mugalmonuments / graveyards as unconstitutional and void.

4. It is further prayed that an ad-interim mandamus on the basis of the ResearchConducted by the petitioner No.-2 as published in the different books written by him

as referred in earlier paragraphs namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahalis a Temple Place, 3.Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers

Howlers, 5. Learning Vedic Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World

History, 7. Agra red Fort is a Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land,

9. The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a Shiva Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was

Great, 11. Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty, Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12.

Islamic Havoc in Indian History Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN 2, B.

D. Chambers, 10/54 D. B. Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005 , and the

truth may be exposed through Scientific inventions and temperaments to the Citizen/

Students of history by conducting the research/ excavations of the remains of Hindu

monuments by the Central Government surroundings to all such Hindu Palace/

temple and other ancient archaeological building/ Monuments as the incidents like

demolition of disputed structure at Ayodhya may not be repeated resulting in mass

destruction of the public property shacking of public confidence under Rule Of Law

in the society.


5/88

5. Any other Direction, Which this Honble Court May deem fit in thecircumstances of the case

Dated; 7th Sepetember ,2004

Yogesh Kumar Saxena

Advocate, High Court (Counsel for the Petitioner)

Chamber No.139,High court, Allahabad


6/88

IN THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 3618 of 2004 (Under Article 226 of constitution of India) (District Agra)

1. Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak. S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society, Aundh, Pune 411007 2. P. N. Oak. S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society, Aundh, Pune - 4110071. Founder President, Institute of RewritingIndian History, Aundh, Pune - 4110071 -----------Petitioner

VERSUS1. Union of India through Secretary,

Human Resources and Development (HRD),

Government of India, New Delhi.2. Secretary, Tourism and Archeological Department, Govt. of India, New Delhi3. Director General, Archaeological Survey of India, Government of India, Janapath, New Delhi.----------Respondents

To,

The Honble the Chief Justice and his lordships other companion Judges of theaforesaid Court. The humble petition of the abovenamed petitioner MOST RESPECTFULLYSHOWETH AS UNDER;

1. That, no other writ petition has been filed or pending on the same controversy involved inthe present writ petition before this Honble Court, nor the petitioners institution, namely, Institute for Re-writing Indian (and World) History has received any notice of caveat

application so far in the present writ petition. The petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 are same

person, but they are impleaded in different capacity.

2. That this writ petition is moved to re-establish the truth and cultural heritage of ourCountry. This writ petition is pertaining to the world marvel, one of the Seven Wonders of the

World, namely, Taj Mahal, and other monuments authorship attributed to Hindu Rulers, much

prior to the period of Mugal Invaders. The ancient monuments and structure are part of our

tradition and culture and evidence of glorious-marvelous architectural achievement and further


7/88

to that it is a part of our heritage. Fraud upon history should not be perpetuated as life is

evaluated in the perspective of history. For the sake of history of heritage, these monuments

should be identified, protected and preserved properly in the right perspective with right

historical records of creation and construction of truth and realities, which includes rectifying

and/ or correcting the wrong records, notions, motivated dis-information and mis- information.

3. That this writ petition is moved in the Public Interest, for a National Cause, to establish thetruth there is no private interest or any other oblique motive, or any other personal gain. The

petitioner institution, known as Institute for Re-writing Indian History, Thane, having

registration no. F-1128 (T) is a public trust. The founder president of the trust is Shri P.N. Oak

S/o Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/o- Plot no. 10, Goodwill Society, Aundh, Pune.411007,

who has written number of books namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal is a

Temple Place, 3.Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers Howlers, 5.

Learning Vedic Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World History, 7. Agra red Fort is a

Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land, 9. The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a Shiva

Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was Great, 11. Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty, Longevity and

Rejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc in Indian History.4. That the petitioner No. 2 is the founder President of an Institution, namely, Institute for

Re-writing Indian (and World) History . The aim and objective of that institution, which is a

registered society having register no. F-1128 (T) as the public trust under the provision of

Bombay Public Trust Act. Inter alia, is to re-discover the Indian history. The monumental

places of historical importance in their real and true perspective having of the heritage of India.

The true copy of memorandum of association of the aforesaid society / public trust having

fundamental objectives along with Income tax exemption certificate under section 80-G (5) of

I.T. Act, 1961 for period 1/4/2003 to 31/3/2006 are filed herewith as marked as Annexure No.

1 and 2 to the writ petition.


8/88

5. That the founder-President of Petitioners Institution namely Shri P. N. Oak is aNational born Citizen of India. He resides permanently at the address given in case title. The

petitioner is a renowned author of 13 renowned books including the books, titled as, The TajMahal is a Temple Place. This petition is related to Taj Mahal, Fatehpur- Sikiri, Red-fort at

Agra, Etamaudaula, Jama- Masjid at Agra and other so called other monuments. All his books

are the result of his long-standing research and unique rediscovery in the respective fields. The

titles of his books speak well about the contents of the subject. His Critical analysis,

dispassionate, scientific approach and reappraisal of facts and figures by using recognised tools

used in the field gave him distinction through out the world. The true copy of the title page of

book namely The Taj Mahal is a Temple Palace . written by Sri P. N. Oak, the author/

petitioner No. 2 is filed as Annexure 3 to this writ petition.6. That the great Kshatriya community pride to defend their faith and the culture of

our country against foreign invasions in converting the monuments by the foreign invaders

requires a sacrificial magnanimity and moral purity in the exposure of the truth to the public

and thereby to safeguard their right of freedom of information couched under Article 19(1) (a)

is the theme behind the writing this Article and the present Petition .The serene beauty, majesty

and grandeur of the Taj Mahal, one of the seventh wonders of the world and other monuments

is still not so well known to the world regarding the true story of its origin. The magnificent

palace, which was built earlier got converted into the Tomb .The changeover has proved a

shroud deluding from lay visitors to the researchers and the great historian Sri P.N. Oak, a co-

worker of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. The popular nostalgia of legendary love to get the

conversion of every Hindu Palace/Temple due to mythical attachment from fanatic raging fire

converting dazzle of leaping flames and blinding smoke should be discouraged into a cool

research regarding the origin. This is required to check a different form of terrorism prevalent

amongst the crusader of the death to the innocent victim on the psychological level. Let us

examine the scared truth about the origin of the monuments.The true copy of the title cover of


9/88

books namely Some Missing Chapters of World History and Some Blunder Of Indian

Historical Research written by Sri P. N. Oak containing the Boigraphy sketch of identity of

great author are filed as Annexure No. 4 and 5

7. That the said book, which is the research paper of the author on the subject that theso-called Taj Mahal is not a monument built by an Invader Emperor Shahajahan in memoryof his late wife but a Hindu Shiva Temple which was converted into a love-memorial by a

Invader Emperor. The true copy of the book was first published in 1968, 2nd edition on 1969,

3rd edition in 1974 namly THE TAJ MAHAL IS TEJO-MAHALAYA : A SHIVA TEMPLE is

filed herewith as Annexure No.6 and large 4th edition published in 1993 shall be produced is

being directed by this Honble Court.

8. That the afforesaid book contaning 35 pages booklet lists scrially numbeded 118points of evidence with may be treated as the submission made before this Honble Court for

making following demands (I) The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) be ordered to remove

forthwish its notices at the entrance to the Taj mahal in Agra attributting its creation to

Shahjahan, since those notice in English, Hindi and Urdu are false and baseless and quate no

authority.(II) Misuse of the left flank building as a mosque be banned since the entire

premises constitute a pre-Shahjahan Tejomhalaya Shiv Temple complex. (III) Free entry on

Fridays be ordered to be discontinued since there being no geniune mosque in the premises

why should the Government lose a days revenue! (IV) If Free entry on Fridays is not

discontinued then Mondays should also be free-entey days because that is a day of special Shiv

worship. (V) The Tejmahal, its two flanking buildings and a well being all seven-storyed they

enclose over a thousand rooms which should all be thrown open to visitorssince they are

charged an entrance free. (VI) The A.S.I. be ordered to remove its locks from those storyed and

also pull down the crude unplastered walling-up by Shahjahan of staircases, ventillators and

doorways leading to those sealed rooms. (VII) The A.S.I. be directed to search for hidden

histirical evidence such as inscriptions, divine idols etc. in those sealed rooms and thick walls


10/88

tampered with by Shahjahan. (VIII) The water in the seven-storyed wall be pumped out to look

for jettisoned valuable and inscription etc. at its bottom when Shahjahans Mogul troops

swooped to confiscate that temple palace complex and the bullion, gems, gold-pitcher, the

gem-studded gold-railing and the Peacock Throne inside, owned by Raja Jaisingh of Jaipur.

(IX) Beating of Nagaras (drums) at ausicious dawn and dusk hours be resumed as of yore in

the two Nagarkhanas in the premises. (X) Since the Taj has two cenotaphs each in the name of

Shahjahan and Mumtaz in two storeyes at least one each of those two pairs of cenotaphs must

be fake since Muslims dont cut their dead into two pieces to be buried under two cenotahs it is

belived. Even the basement conotaphs coulds be genuine because they are two storeyed higher

than the Yamuna river bed ground level. Therefore the ASI be directed to investigate which of

those cenotaphs if any are genuine or whether both are fakes or whether there are any more

fake conotaphs upto the ground level ? (XI) The Koranic graft patched along the entrance

arches be ordered to be removed since those are illagel forged imposition to be Islamic

lettering desecrating the ancient sacred Shiv shrine. (XII) Extensive repairs to the hundreds of

sealed or locked rooms in the storeyes beneath and above the marble floor be ordered to be

undertaken immediately to prevent collapes of the Tajmahal from internal weakness. (XIII)

The A.S.I. should be directed to intestigate as to who stencilled the Arabic letter Allah and

some Englishmens names on the mental pinnacle shift rooted in the dome, since no such

names exits on the full scale replica of the pinnacle shaft inlaid in the red stone courtyard on

the eastern flank of the Tajmahal. (XIV) The Muslim attendants squatting by the side of the

cenotaphs should be decommissioned and disbanded because the cenotaphs are fakes covering

the ancient Shivlings. (XV) Since the towering seven-storyed Tajmahal edifice must have been

raised over an underground basement the ASI should be directed to investigiate whether there

is any such hidden, buried basement as was the ancient Vedic practice.

9. That in 1155- 1158 A.D.It is said that Raja Paramdardi dav, a Jat Ruler on his behalfand on behalf of the Minister Salakahan who constructed Tejoji Mahal which came in


11/88

occupation Of Raja Man Singh and remain in possession of Raja Jai Singh when It was tkenfor conversion to Taj Mahal, for the purposes of shifting the remains of Arjumand

Banu( Mumtaj )W/o Emperor Shahajahan Died In between 1629-1632 and buried at

Burhanpur and her body Exhumed after about 6 months (as disclosed in Shahajan

Badshahnama written by MullaAbdul Hameed lahori).10. That, it is said that in 1629-1632 A.D. Arjumand Banu( Mumtaj )W/o

Emperor Shahajahan Died in between and was buried at Burhanpur and her body may beExhumed after about 6 months.It is submitted that 1641-1668 A.D.is probable period of theshroud deluding changeover of Hindu Palace/Temple as mughal Monument/ Graveyard. It issubmmited that in 1652 A.D. Aurangazab Letter showing his somsidern about need of

elaborate repairs of Taj Mahal.. If Taj Mahal was constracted in 1641 to 1668, why Auranjabsought for illobrate repair. It was nothing, except for changing the authoriship of building as

Mughal monument. In 1658 A.D. Emperor Shah jahan died. Their after his graveyard was also

placed in Taj Mahal near the graveyard of Arjumand Banu( Mumtaj )W/o Emperor

Shahajahan. It appear that koranic in graving dragged for camouflaging Hindu building with

Muslim Lattering as a hoary tredition, which is evidence Adhai- Din-Ka-opda at Ajmar which

was a part of vigragharaj Vishandeos palace an also at kutabminar with a legerdemain of

Islamik carinngs on it.

11. That in 1843 A.D., the Governer General Lord Auckland with his lieutenantcunningham tempered entire historical data of the arcologicaly department by converning theauthoriship of these Hindu palaces to Mughal monument for adoptding the policy of Divide

and Rule. A deep Conspiracy Committed By Lieutenant Alexander Cunningham in

1842-1847.

12. That in 1904 A.D., the provisons of The Ancient Monuments Preservation Act,1904,have further tempered the entire histrocial data of the arcologicaly department by


12/88

converning the authoriship of these Hindu palaces/monuments to Mughal monument for

adoptding the policy of Divide and Rule13. That in 1951 A.D., the provision of The Ancient And Historical Monuments

And Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of National Importance) Act, 1951are

further intesified the falsehood of these Buildings by shifting the authership of these

monuments. Thus this Writ Petition is filed seeking declaration to the extend of declaring the

ancient and historical monuments and other and Archaeological Sites namely Taj Mahal.

Fatehpur-sikiri, Agra Red Fort, Ethmadualla and other Monuments as built by Mugal invaders

allegedly on the basis of report submitted by Then Governor General, Lord Auckland, andyoung lieutenant Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme of Divide and

Ruleand thereby misusing the archaeological studies, be declared as ultravires to Article 19(1) (a), 25,26 49 And 51-A (f) (h) Constitution of India.

14. That this Honble Court may futher declare the provision of Ancient andHistorical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National

Importance) Act, 1951 (71 of 1951), The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And

Remains Act, 1958 of declaring these ancient building/ monuments preserved with such false

mughal identity with out any scientific inquiry/ investigation as purported Mughal

monuments / Graveyards as unconstitutional and void.

15. That in 1968 A.D Sri P.N.Oak written his first book titled as Taj Mahal isTEJO-MAHALAYA : A SHIVA TEMPLE. In 1974 A.D. It is submitted that in the Carbon

dating test 14 conducted of the doors timber placed on the Northern side of Taj Mahalbuilding now remooved from its location Towards Yamuna River at Dashahara Ghat and Basai

Ghat from where the public could have a glance towards Shiva Temple constructed at the top

of Raja Mansingh Palace Which was in Occupation of his grand Son Raja Jai Singh, when itwas forciably taken by Emperor Sahajahan for burial of Arjumand Banu( Mumtaj )W/o


13/88

Emperor Shahajahan Died in between and buried at Burhanpur and her body Exhumed afterabout 6 months

16. That this book is being well accepted in India and abroad. The popularnostalgia for legendary love has helped fan then flame of Shahajajahans mythical attachment

to Mumtaz into a raging fire, envoloping the taj in the dazzale of leaping flames and blinding

smoke of imaginary accounts, discouraging the cool, dispassionate research about its origion It

has raised no controversy. Since the reasons given therein supported with documented record

have proved conclusively the findings and conclusions of the author. Thus the objective of the

research conducted by the petitioner No.2 is not to cultivate any animosity or any thing to

invade the feeling of any citizen, except the exposure of the truth to the citizen, historians and

to the young generation, as they may not be mislead by falsehood, in order to swept away by

the impulse of terrorist oriented approach of the fundamentalist under our secular democratic

structural approach in the preamble of our constitution.

17. That Hindu Palace/Temple conversion in Invader Monuments like TajMahal- Invasion of our Indian Heritage by Archaeological Dept under the garb of The Ancient

Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains Act, 1958 ( Act No.24 of !958)- IndianHistorical Blunders A deep Conspiracy Committed By lieutenant Alexander Cunningham in1842-1847.Reference collected from the books of Sri P.N. Oak The Taj Mahal Is A Temple

palace Some Blunder of Indian Historical Research Some Missing Chapters of World

History- AGRA RED FORT is a Hindu building. Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN 2,

B.D. Chambers, 10/54 D. B. Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005.

18. That the freedom of speech and expression is basic to indivisible from ademocratic polity .It includes right to impart and receive information. Restriction to the said

right could be only as provided in Article 19(2) to (6) of the constitution of India. The old

dictum let the people have the truth and the freedom to discuss it and all will go well with the

Government. It should prevail. The true test for deciding the validity is whether it takes away


14/88

or abridges fundamental right of the citizens. If there were direct abridgement of the

fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression, the law would be invalid. If the

provisions of the law violate the constitutional provisions, they have to be struck down and

that is what is required to be done in the present case .It is made clear that no provision is

nullified on the ground, that the Court does not approve the underlying policy of the

enactment.

19. That the ambit and scope of Right to Know along with right of conscience,fath and Religion are conferred fundamental right under Article 19 (1)(a), 25, 26, 49, 51-A (f)

(h) of the Constitution of India; read with the provision of Freedom of Information Act,

2002 .The right to get information in democracy is recognized all throughout and it is a natural

right flowing from the concept of democracy itself. Freedom of expression may be necessarily

included in the right of information. There is no expression with out having an idea on the

subject, regarding which the expression of an individual may be given effect to change the

existing values of ideology, which are based on the notable extracts of certain facts. An

enlightening informed citizen would undoubtedly enhance democratic values. On one hand, we

are suffering from the past prejudice of caste predomination amongst the different section of

the citizen. This country called as Arya Varta in the ancient time was so excellent, as there was

no match equal to our country on this earth. The creation of the terminology of Aryan

considering themselves to be noble was earlier regarded the real philosophers touchstone to

eradicate the falsehood from its perception. However by the gradual deterioration in the

standard of the good behavior, righteousness, decency which were having the foundation of

impartiality, love and conscientiousness, there has been the complete absence of discrimination

in the social coordination. The true copy of the provision of Freedom of Information Act, 2002

is filed herewith and marked as Annexure No. 7.

20. That truth will not make us rich, but it will certainly make us free. The wronghistorical data leads to the horror, as we have seen during the period of demolition of the Babri


15/88

Masjid. There has been number of concomitant given by the respective community

representing to the follower of two prominent religions, but the loss that we have suffered in

the shape of hatred between the two section of the society, cannot be compensated without

revealing the truth. Unfortunately, the term Hindu communalism is more exaggerated by the

fanaticism under the garb of secularism, while the Hindu community as a whole has always

been receptive to all the religion. The question, which is cropping its importance, is much more

in relations to the question pertaining to Invader contributions to Indian life and culture. Such

facts which have been geared to brainwash the subject of the pupil, with that of perverted

history under the long spell of foreign rule, may be distorted according to the command of the

ruler and as such till date the truth has not brought forward to the surface and is exclusively

aliens to the appeasement policy generated in order to rule the parliamentary democratic set up

in our country.

21. That the mentalities affect and paralyse the traditional heritage and provide a lossto the integrity of our country. Our ancient ancestors namely Rana Pratap and Chattrapati

Shivaji Maharaj and Guru Govind Singh during the period of Mughal rulers have not conceded

with the terror and torture, they used in proselytization. It is very shameful for the independent

citizens to live under the false perception of character assassination. Thus in all fairness, we

may be bound to accept that although the Britishers may pose themselves more civilized, but

inspite of their so called great insight, there is the historical blunder committed by them, while

writing the Indian history in relations to the authorship of the monuments. Invader rulers,

without exception were sadist, yet they represent themselves as just, kind and patrons of

learning. The construction is seen with all Hindu traditions, while these foreigners, who were

either Invader or crusaders have done the destruction of these constructions. These persons

were stained with all wickedness and disgraceful conduct, which is still apparent in the society

and remain prevalent during a thousand year of rampant Invader communalism, then how we

can expect that they have not demolished all the Hindu Temple and converted them with slight


16/88

modification as their monuments. The township of Ferozabad, Tuglaqabad, Ahmedabad, and

Hyderabad are falsely ascribed to that of Sultan, though the same was belonging to our ancient

Hindu Rulers. The country in which the milk was available to every citizen without investing

any money to the extent of his requirement and consumption has now been adulterd after

ruthless killings of our cattles by these invaders of the public confidence. Actually

Hinduism is nothing representing to religious foundations, but our belief, synonymous to

nationalism and sooner it may be understood and practiced in such a manner, we may seek the

protection of our integrity by saving the population of the innocent citizens.

22. That at Dilwara Jain temple in District Shirohi, Rajasthan having the whiteMarvel and the Elephants statue, there are still the sign of the atrocities committed by these

Mugal invaders having the mass destruction of the construction on the upper portion of

structure. However, since the temple lying below the surface was filled up with the mud and

earth., this Dilwara Jain Temple having identical construction as that of Taj Mahal and other

Marvel buildings could have been saved from these invaders of Humanities. Thus the truth

may be exposed to the public that the invaders were never the Builders of monuments, but they

were rather the destroyer of our ancient cultural heritage, which was preserved by the 85% of

Hindu citizens from the time immortal. Let Hindu be now permitted to save their temple from

being converted to the Graveyards any more by our so-called guardians of society under the

appeasement policy of Divide and Rule.

23. That the mankind must be satisfied with the reasonableness within reachand the decision-making process may belong to the knowledge of the law. Thus the

reasonableness and the rationality, legality, as well as philosophically, provide colour to the

meaning of fundamental right .The concept of equality is not doctrinaire approach. It is a

binding threat, which runs through the entire constitutional text. Thus the affirmative action

may be constitutionally valid and the same cannot ignore the constitutional morality, which

embraces in itself the doctrine of inequality. It would be constitutionally immoral to perpetuate


17/88

inequality among majority .The constitution is required to kept young energetic and alive. The

attempt be endured to expand the ambit of fundamental right. It is said that the dignity of the

ocean lies not in its fury capable of causing destruction, but in its vast extent and depth with

enormous tolerance. Thus the wider the power, the higher the need of caution and care, while

exercising the power.

24. That public education is essential for functioning of the process of populargovernment and to assist the discovery of truth and strengthening the capacity of individual in

participating in decision making process .The decision making process include the right to

know also and pushing the protection beyond the primary level betrays the bigwigs desire to

keep the crippled more crippled forever. The education of spiritualism is the foundation for

value based survival of human being in a civilized society. The force and sanction hidden

behind civilized society depend upon moral value; and the morality cannot be cultivated

through the falsehood of ideological barrier. Thus the children may not be required to read

such facts, which are having the foundation of falsehood.

25. That our educational institutions are the foundation of the characteristics; onthe basis of which; the young generation will solve the problem of national solidatory and

integration. The children are taught to adhere with the truth for their existence in future; but the

alarming situation linked with the history written by the alien rule has not only nurtured the

myth amongst the independent citizens; but many monuments have been falsely credited to the

alien Invader rulers, who were driven across the Indian borders at sword point and continued

to rule our nation mercilessly without given any importance to the existing palace and the

temple built by the inhabitant ancestors of the rulers at the contemporary period.

26. That education is an investment made by the nation in its children for harvesting afuture crop of responsible adults productive of a well functioning society. However children

are vulnerable. They need to be valued, nurtured, caressed, and protected. Imparting of

education is State function. Thus since the human mind is not a tape recorder, it would make a


18/88

perfect reproduction letter in the society .It is said that every State action must be informed by

reason. Thus the freedom of expression, which includes Right to Know may be allowed to

be enjoyed by the citizen to the fullest possible extent without putting shackles of avoidable

cobweb of rules and regulations putting restriction on such freedom. Justice has no favorite,

except the truth. A reason varies in its conclusion according to the idiosyncrasy of the

individual and the times and the circumstances, in which he thinks.

27. That the terminology of history is derived from Greek word Historia meaningthere by an enquiry. Since the enquiry is nothing, but the same is attributed to the different

branch of knowledge. Thus the inquisitiveness is always generated in educated mind. The

history should not be guided solely on etymological terminology. The meaning of Itihas

which is derivated from a Sanskrit word, leads to three terminology .The first one namely iti

means such and such (a happening or event),ha means indefinitely while aas means

happened. Thus the history is chronological happening of the different event during the past

period

28. That the Student/children, the future citizens under taking the education of IndianHistory studying on the misconception/ pattern of Anglo Saxon teaching, which was meant fordivision of Indian society on the policy of Divide and Rule. There is a important question

posed, as to whether we have actually gain our independence or we have to undertake another

journey full of animosity, aggressism on account of terrorism and fanatic ideology prevalent

throughout the World of some particular religion. Thus on account of being sentinel /Guardian

at large, this is the voice of the majority of Hindu Citizens to save our ancestral cultural

heritage and thereby to give protection to our future citizens. They have the threat of being

subjected to atrocities, if the drastic step to save the citizens from the oppression and exposure

of falsehood may not be done at an earliest time. Thus every nationalist, who has got a

slightest patriotic cult in his inhibition, has got a Fundamental Right and a Constitutional Duty

to safeguard our cultural heritage against the falsehood. Imparting of education is a State


19/88

function. The State, however, having regard to its financial and other constraints is not always

in a position to perform its duties. The function of imparting education has been, to a large

extent, taken over by the citizens themselves. Some do it as pure charity; some do it for

protection of their Interests.

29. That Article 25 of the constitution in India secures to every person, subject ofcourse to public order, health and morality and other provisions of Part III, including Article 17

freedom to entertain and exhibit outward acts as well as to propagate and disseminate such

religious belief according to his judgement and conscience for edification of others. The right

of the State to impose such restrictions as are desired or found necessary on grounds of public

order, health, and morality is inbuilt in Arts. 25 and 26 itself. Article 25(2)(b) ensures the right

of the State to make a law providing for social welfare and reforms besides throwing open of

Religious institutions of a public character to classes and sections of Citizens and any such

rights of State or of the communities or classes of the society were also considered to need

with due regulation in the process of harmonizing the various rights. The vision of the

founding fathers of the Constitution to liberate the society from blind and ritualistic adherence

to mere traditional superstitious beliefs sans reason or rational basis has found expression in

the form of Art. 17 of Constitution of India. The protection under Arts. 25 and 26 extends a

guarantee for rituals and observances, ceremonies and modes of worship which are integral

parts of religion but as to what really constitutes an essential part of religion or religious

practice has to be decided by the courts with reference to the doctrine of a particular religion or

practices regarded as parts of religion

30. That a society, where there is no moral values, there would neither be socialorder nor secularism. Bereft of moral values secular society or democracy may not survive.

Almighty alone is the dispenser of the absolute justice. Thus an independent and efficient

judicial system, belong the repository of omnipotent power is always consider as one of the

basic structure of our constitution. The pre-constitutional days cannot be countenanced as a


20/88

source of law to claim any rights, when it is found to violate human rights, dignity social

equality amongst citizen. Democracy cannot survive and the constitution cannot work unless

Indian citizens are only learned and intelligent; and they are also of moral character and

imbibed the inherent virtue of human being such as truth, love and compassion. Duty of every

citizen of India is collective duty of the state.

31. That every citizen of India is fundamentally obligated to develop a scientifictemper and humanism .He is fundamentally duty bound to strive towards excellence, in all

sphere of individual and collective activity, so that the nation constantly rises to the higher

level of endeavor and achievements. Everyone, whether individually or collectively is

unquestionably under the supremacy of law. However it is true that exaggerated devotion to

the rule of benefit must not nurture fanciful doubts or lingering suspicion and thereby destroy

social defense, as the curiosity cannot be the subject matter of fair criticism. Thus the

conclusion derived that on one hand, every citizen is having the freedom of speech and

expression so far as they do not contravene the statutory limits and may prevail in the

atmosphere with out any hindrance. Fundamental duties and the obligation of the citizen may

yet provide a valuable guide and aid to interpretation of constitutional issues which not only

required for resolving the issues but also to provide guidance to the society. Giving a man his

due, one of the basics of justice finds reflected in right to equality .Law frowns upon such

conduct thus the court accords legitimacy to possession in due course of time.

32. That the concept of sovereignty was present from the ancient time but thesovereignty was conferred upon an individual who is suppress the wicked and is recognized as

great resources in itself like the god of fire, air, sun, moon and religion. The religion in the

ancient time was considered as spiritualism and it was not dependent upon any ritual

ceremony, but it was considered s the knowledge in the darkness of ignorance and injustice.

The sovereignty was supposed to promote the cause of the religion, wealth and enjoyment of

life and those, who were voluptuous, malicious, mean and low-minded, were ruined by the


21/88

retributive justice. Thus the sovereignty was considered as a destroyer of the wicked by fire; a

restrainer of the wicked by storm (Varun) and its controller. It was considered to be the

dispenser of ease to the best pupil like the moon and a replenisher of wealth. These qualities

were the quality of the sovereign power.

33. That now the sovereignty is attributed upon the three institution namely thelegislature, the executive and the judiciary. The combined effect of the three institutions makes

a democratic society. The legislature is creature like lord Brahma while the executives like lord

Vishnu may provide the welfare to the public. The judicial institutions like lord Shiva is the

dispenser of justice and is also the protector of all subjects. The law of retributive justice

wakes when the people sleep. Hence wise men regard the law or punishment as virtue or

religion.

34. That the sovereignty and the people should form three Councils, Educational,Religious, and Administrative. One individual should not have the absolute power of

government, the sovereignty being the general president of the councils .The qualifications of

the president the presidents of separate councils are their interest in the welfare of the country,

their excellence of learning and character, and their influence over the people. A country

prospers as long as the people are righteous. Also their welfare requires the appointment of

learned educational officers, appointment of learned men as the dignitaries of the spiritual

council and of virtuous learned men as administrators. Obedience to law is required of all.

35. That the secularism is the basic structure of constitution and as such inabsence of study of religion for generating brotherhood amongst the fellow citizens as to

provide mutual coordination and the ideology of live and let live to other is the basic

education, which cannot be said as an attempt against the secular philosophy of the

constitution .The constitution as it stands does not proceed on the melting pot theory while it

represents a salad bowls, where there is homogeneity without any obliteration of identity .

The foundation of the religion is spiritualism, which is based on trust and confidence and an


22/88

ability to strive for the good self of the other individual. The law must be enforceable to

preserve the society with out any derivation and hindrance and thus it may not resultantly face

the social catastrophe.

36. That the little Indian shall not be hijacked from the course of freedom by mobmuscle method and thereby to subtle perversion of discretion by other large Indian dressed in

little, brief authority. The people of our country has right to know every public Act and the

principle of finality may not be insisted upon as the maxim interest reipublicae ut sit finis

litiun. Wisdom and advisability of public policy may be demonstrated in order to given effect

to the statutory provisions under our constitution thus an inquiry and investigation may be

needed a complete with the opinion of the expertise to arrive a conclusion as to whether the

plurability in a society is not splited the very object of the law through appeasement to the

minority group of the citizen in order to provide a conducive political social and legal

framework with out destroying the very fabric on the basis of which the pillar and the

foundation were built in order to assimilate the minorities with the majority.

37. That the Honble court may never venture to disown its jurisdiction when theconstitution is found to be at stake and the fundamental rights of the citizen are under fire of

falsehood and thereby usurpation of the power by terrorizing for personal leisure and pleasure

through self created dogmas and rituals of particular religion at the cost of other citizens. Thus

the exposure of the falsehood may become the right of the affected party to vanish the

assertion based on unpatriotic sentimental perversity.

38. That in Bijoe Emmanuel Vs State of Kerala (1986) 3 SCC 615, the questionraised in the aforesaid case, as to whether three children who were faithful to Jehovahs

witnesses may refuse to sing our national anthem or salute the national flag of our country

despite being the student in the school, where during morning assembly, the national anthem is

sung by other children. The circular issued by the Director of Public Instruction, Kerala

provided obligation of school children to sing the National Anthem. Thus these children were


23/88

expelled. The Honble Supreme court while setting aside the aforesaid order of expulsion of

the children from the school was pleased to examine, as to whether the children faithful to

Jehovahs witnesses, a worldwide sect of Christianity may be compelled against tenets of

their religious faith duly recognized and well established all over the world which was upheld

by the highest court in United States of America, Australia and Canada and find recognition in

Encyclopedia Britannica. It was held that the appellants truly and conscientiously believed that

their religion does not permit them to join any rituals except it them in their prayers to

Jehovah, their God. Though their religious beliefs may appear strange, the sincerity of their

beliefs is beyond question. They do not hold their beliefs idly and their conduct is not the

outcome of any perversity. The appellants have not asserted the beliefs for the first time or out

of any unpatriotic sentiments. Their objection to sing is not just against the National Anthem of

India. They have refused to sing other National Anthems elsewhere. They are law abiding andwell-behaved children, who do stand respectfully and would continue to do so, when National

Anthem is sung. Their refusal, while so standing to join in the singing of the National Anthem

is neither disrespectful of it, nor inconsistent with the Fundamental Duty under Article 51 A

(a). Hence no action should have been taken against them.

39. That in a pluralistic society like India, which accepts secularism as the basicideology to govern its secular activities, education can include study based on Religious

Pluralism. Religious pluralism exclusivism and encourages inclusivism. Thus in pluralistic

society, it is necessary that there may not be any encroachment upon the follower of other

ideology. Value based education is likely to help the mission to fight against all the kinds of

prevailing fanaticism, ill will, violence, dishonesty, corruption and terrorism in the different

form Citizens by getting the protection to a certain degree of preference to the minority on the

cost of majority of citizen .The education is permissible only on the grounds of convenience,

suitability and familiarity with an educational environment but the same should not be


24/88

excessive to the substantial departure of tolerance and based on practically not existentintolerable fanatic ideological aggressism .

40. That the prevalent socio-economic system having the vast majority of thepeople, ignorant uneducated and easily liable to be mislead may also be provided their due

legitimization in governance of their life as they repose tremendous faith in the secularism .It

is the constitutional obligation of the state to provide the justice by emancipation of the

falsehood as the commitment of Article 19 (1) (a), providing right of expression to an

individual. It may be unreasonable if we are unable to give the exact definition of

reasonableness to the people in a democratic institution .Law cannot afford any favorite other

than truth as the manifest injustice is curable in nature; rather than incurable mediocrity over

meritocracy, which cuts the root of justice. Protective push or prop by way of reservation or

classification must withstand any over generous approach to the section of the beneficiary, if it

handles the effect of destroying anothers right to education, more so, by pushing in a mediocre

over meritorious and thereby belies the hope of generating the social coordination.

41. That long slavery, paradoxically enough, makes the slave to look upon the verychange that bind him as his life support. This story was told to the convict in ancient time and

who was confined in the dingy cell for fifteen years. After fifteen year the detainee was set free

and he gingerly step out of the prison gate. His eyes, which were used to the dim light wilted at

the bright sunshine outside everything including traffic, the gazing eyes were the strange look

to the detainee and as such he felt terrified. He took a long look at the outside world and

thereafter he inhaled a deep breath and there after by a sudden dash he again reached to his

dogs tether in the cell as his imprisonment has sapped his self-confidence. This is what has

happened in India.

42. That this feeling utter destitution, dejection, desperation and the loss of allconfidence is the result of our slavery, by which the Indians have forgotten their own past

history, lost freedom and obliviousness of the delights of an unfettered life thus it is necessary


25/88

to keep the flame of the truth burning in the heart of every enlightened citizen as the majority

of the public is unaware of the truth.

43. That the glory of our country may only be restored when our traditional heritageculture may revive, when every citizen may get the rid from adulterated history. The historical

concepts, which have been distorted during the long period of slavery, may become a task of

utmost importance and urgency. An inadequate understanding on impressionable citizen has

resulted in the further accessibility in implanting the misleading concepts and thereby breaking

the heads and idols of the fellow citizen due to the segmentation of the society in many

composition.

44. That the true history must atleast be written in the contemporary language andit should remain independent from interpolation, otherwise the very existence of our cultural

heritage may be evaporated from the sight of the future generation. The Governor General,

Lord Auckland, and young lieutenant Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous

scheme of misusing the archaeological studies. This young Cunnigham, an army engineer had

no training in the archaeological department, he wrote a lengthy letter dated September 15,

1842 suggesting archeological exploration in India. This letter is reproduced on page no 246

Volume 7 journal of Royal Asiatic Society, London, 1843 A. D. It discloses that the purpose of

archeological exploration in India is neither the study; nor preservation of historical

monuments, but to use archeology as the imperial tool to create mutual dissension and

resentment between Buddhists, Jains and other Hindu with Invaders by falsely crediting all

monuments to the authorship to alien invaders while few may be labeled as that of being

constructed by Buddhist or Jain, but not by Hindus.

45. That the indo-saranice theory of architecture is the existence of Hindupatrons in all medieval monuments thus it is necessary that the credit must be given to such

Hindu artists who designed the monuments. It may not be given to medieval cruelty and

fanaticism adopted by chauvinistic Invader invaders. The infidel designs on each and every


26/88

Invader mosque and tomb reveals the tolerance of Hindu citizens who were subjected to the

cruelty and terrorism from the last one thousand years. This article does not reflect any

animosity between the different section of the society but this is a description of sum of the

thought provocating a revelation in relations to the blunder committed by the Historian on the

foundation of sacrosanct concepts.

46. That the pioneer, In English daily newspaper of Lucknow it was observed thatThe Archeological survey of India reports (brought out under Alexander Cunningham) are

feeble, inane and all but useless and the Government has reasons to be ashamed of the majority

of the volume. It appears that Cunningham planted false Invader cenotaphs inside Hindu

building, inserted Koranic over writing on Hindu edifices and sponsored the fabrication of

documents to be given to Invader caretaker for conversion of the Hindu Building like Taj

Mahal, Red fort, Fatehpur Sikri, Sikandara, Etmadudullah built by Hindu rulers to the Invader

monuments. Let us begin with the dubious instance of 230-ft. high tower called as Qutub

Minar to which historian claims to have been built by Qutuubbdin Aibak from 1206-1210 A.D.

The other historian claims that it was built by his son- in- law and successor Iltmash, while

other claim it to be built by Allauddin Khilji. The fourth view is of Ferozshah Tuglaq, while

the fifth view is that all these rulers jointly or severely built the tower. Everyone knows that

there is no basis for the above assertion. But the public knows the truth by mere seeing the

sight of Qutub Minar that the same is having so many deity and temple adjoining to this

monument. The true copy of report published in Hindustan Times regarding the sign of maker

of Taj Mahal published on 6th July 2004 is filed as Annexure No. 8 .

47. That these historians may be impeached for gross dereliction of their dutyand for committing cheating upon the conscience of the public. The truth is not amenable to all

individual as no one could dare to become vigilant enough and to collect true version about the

mediaeval township of Hindu rulers. We therefore caution the world of history not to place any

faith in Anglo-Invader translations of Invader lettering or documents made hitherto.it is


27/88

submited that The number of report regarding the authorship of Taj Mahal, Fatehpur-sikiri

published in Amar Ujala on the basis of the reserch condect by its Senior Sub-Editer Sri Bhanu

Pratap Singh Resident of Shastri-puram, Bodala Road, Sinkandra, Agra shell be produced at

the time of arguments.

48. That the Later Percy Brown, James Ferguson, Sir Kenneth Clarke, Sir BannisterFletcher and Encyclopaedia Britannica orchestrated the same cunning tune of Cunnigham.

That resulted in firmly establishing and perpetuating a colossal archaeological fraud which is

being sedulously taught all over the world as profound academic truth and is echoed in

newspaper articles and telecasts for over a century. Cunninghams suggestion was obviously

highly appreciated. Because when he retired from the army as a Major General he was

straightaway appointed the first archeological surveyor of India in 1861,as director from 1862

to 1865 and as Director General from 1871 to 1885. Thus the historical data based onarcheological study conducted by Cunningham are scheming brain of notorious design

regarding their vagueness and deceptive notions. The archeological survey of India was

dramatically closed from 1861 to 1865 when the two assistant of Cunningham namely J D

Beglar and Carlleyle took over the charge and prepare the list of historical monuments with

fabricated historical records. Consequently persons working around the world as the expert

Invader known as Saracenic architecture in museum became the pseudo experts unwittingly

perpetuating the fraud with the people. T he historical cities were converted to Islam and the

pre Invader edifices built according to the Vedic architecture were vanished from existence.

49. That the ancient Indian history is remarkable from the time of the epic ofRamayana and Mahabharata. There are the evidence that their exists the Hindu palaces having

the creation of it by the marble and other precious stone. In the ancient time there was

sculpture based on our ethical and religious concepts. The cultural heritage was in existence in

the form of iron pillars, the mandate of the ruler on copper scripts and the creation of the

artistic image indicating civilization on the different religious temple of the contemporary


28/88

period. These were the valuable antiques, which were ruthlessly destructed by the foreign

invaders. The portraits of the ruler and their identification could be seen on the rocks and coins

of the relevant period, which are hidden inside the earth due to the barbaric destruction of our

Hindu heritage. The prominent place of these heritage found are at Mohinjaddeo, Harrapa

(Sind), Takshila (Punjab), Kaushambi, Sarnath, Mathura(Uttar Pradesh), Patilaputra ,

Nalanda(Bihar), Rajgiri , Sanchi, Burhotra (Madhya Bharat),Agadi, Vanvasi, Talkand and

Maski(south).

50. That there has been number of articles written by foreign visitors/delegates/diplomat and ambassadors amongst whom Magastahenes from Domiscus (Syria) and

Deoneses (Egypt) are prominent .The descirption of the great ruler Sri Chandragupta Maurya

may be found in the writing of Magasthenes. The Chinese writer Faiyan left the glimpse of

Vikramaditya period thereafter Honchong came to India and remained here for about 15 years

who has described the period of Harshvardhan religious and social coordination. Harshvardhan

was the prominent ruler of our nation. At the last we may get some description from the article

of Alavruni who came along with Mohammed Ghaznavi and examined the traditions of Hindu

which are described in (Tahikate hind )

51. That thus the civilization at Sindh river at Harappa has got the enormous storingcapability of the food articles which were distribute by the Hindu rulers during their

Anusthan in the different part of our country .The discovery of Godam meant for storage ofthe grains is still found in Harrapa civilization which has become a part of Pakistan after th

division of our country. It is evident that the people of the contemporary period were having

their expertise in molding the copper pots for storage of the valuable herbal extracts meant for

providing the cure from the ailments. All these cultural heritage of our Hindu civilization has

not been preserved by our archeological department.

52. That the period of destruction after reaching to the optimum heights after thepropagation of Jain religion and Buddhism, may be relate back from the period of Ajatshatru,


29/88

Nand Samrajya when Sikander invaded our country in 267 B.C. at Peshawar. He fought a

battle from King Puru near Jhelum river and due to natural calamity of unprecedented rains,

the elephant could not provide any impact upon aggressors, who were fully equipped to fight

the Guerilla battle. The defeat of King Abhishad in Kashmir was the beginning of external

invasion by the foreign invaders.

53. That during the Maurya dynasty, the King Chandragupta Maurya, who wasgetting instructions from great Chanakya had successfully defeated Celucus but subsequently

he entered with a compromise with Chandragupta Maurya as a result of which Chandragupta

got eastern part of Unan namely aria, archosia, gadrosia and paronishdi. Chandragupta Maurya

subsequently married with the daughter of King of Unan. Thus our country under the

domination of the dynasty of Chandragupta Maurya was extended up to Unan to Mysore in the

south. Thus except Kashmir and Kalinga the boundary our country was extended upto

Afghanistan and Baluchistan. But unfortunately the period of Chandragupta Maurya could not

remain intact. There was the revolt at tatshila which was suppressed during the reign of

Bindusar by great ruler of our nation namely Ashoka the great. King Ashoka fought a battle

with Kalinga and in this manner the dimension of the area, which was extended upto

Baluchistan was further extended from makaram, sindh, kutch, kyauli, swat ki vally, but

Kashmir Nepal and Assam remained in exclusion to the aforesaid domination.

54. That subsequently Great King Ashoka became the disciple of Lord Buddha andhe has started expansion to the percepts of the religion by having the affixation of the symbolic

predomination adhered with the aforesaid religion. He constructed the Ashoka pillars from

mono block of a rock. On the top of which, there was the symbolic resemblance of four lion,

while in midst, there was a chakra comprising of 24 arches and the Bull and the elephants

scriptures were carved out in the middle of the single rock, below which, there was the lotus in

the downward directions. The symbolic resemblance of the lotus became a tradition for

construction of the temple. Thus we may find out that wherever the lotus is evident on any


30/88

monument with the scripture like the vegetable leafs, grapes, peacock and other religious

offering provided to the deity kept inside the temple.

55. That the foundations of Invader were based on the concepts of destruction ofthe existing values prevalent amongst the Buddha and Hindu religion. Although, it is widely

accepted that prior to the creation of other Religion, every one was himself initially the

follower of Hindu religion. He was initially opposed to existence of other religious

adomination. There was the preaching, that whosoever he might be, he does not follow the

Islam, then, there may be the army of Invader followers, who may terrorise him for conversion

to them. In this process if there may be the use of terrorism by showing of it the follower of

other religion may loose the confrontation in the expansion of Invader fundamentalist then

even they use to profess the aforesaid crusade. Thus after the existence of such a drastic army

of the crusaders, there was no possibility that the other peace loving religion may still remain

in existence. Unfortunately Hindu, Jain, Buddh religion followers were dependent upon the

policy of non-violence, peace and tranquillity and under their religious philosophy i.e, the

entire world is likes a family of the different ideology.

56. That the beginning of the Invader invasion in our country starting from thetime of Mohammed Bin Quasim in 712 A.D., there was the gruesome murder committed of

King Daher and thereafter his two daughters after outraging their modesty were handed over

by Mohammed Bin Quasim to his uncle namely Abdul Abbass of Oman. However the Invader

ruler after been instigated by the daughters of the King Daher got this Mohammed Bin Quasim

death by putting him alive inside the leather of the cow for invading the chastity of two girls

prior to their offering to Sultan. This was the beginning of destruction of our cultural heritage

by these ruthless invaders. The description of it may be seen in a book written by R. C.

Mazumdar namely the Arab mission of India.

57. That Sultan Mohammed Ghaznavi robbed Somenath temple. Ultimatelyafter invading and defeating the different Rajput rulers for more than seventeen time from the


31/88

year of 1000 to 1026 A.D. This man was the follower of Islamic fanatism, who destructed

many temples during his aggression. Abdul Fateh Daud,a Invader ruler of Sultan was so

terrified that he offered his apology to Mohammed Ghaznavi and at the same time Jaypal who

committed the suicide instead of being surrendered before Mohammed Ghaznavi, his son

Anand Pal was also defeated near Peshawar. In the sixth attack committed upon our nation byMohammed Ghaznavi. Anand Pal thereafter associate of the King of Ujjain, Gwalior, kalingar,

kannuanj, Delhi and Ajmer, but due to the division in the army , Mohammed Ghaznaviu again

defeated him and thereafter the he attacked on the Palace of Nagarkot Kingdom. These

invasions started from the year of 1007 upto 1027 A.D. continued to remain near Sindhsagar

Navnandh, Yagesghwar, Barran, Mahram, Mathura, Kalinjar and ultimately at Katiabad due to

disintegrity of the Hindu rulers. Ultimaley Mohhamed Ghaznavi died on 30th April 1030.

58. That the journey of Shahabuddin Mohammed Gauri started from 1176 to 1178for the victory of Multan and Kutch. He conducted so many attacks with the help of King of

Jammu upto 1186. He entered in Gujrat, but Mool Raj the King of Anhilavada got him

defeated. However in 1191, he conquered Malinga and Shar-Hind, which included the territory

of Delhi. Thus Delhi and Ajmer remained under his domination, while he attacked at Kannuaj,

Chandivada (near Etawah), Gwalior and Vijana. Gayasuddin Mohammed Gauri died in 1102.

59. That the reason for the defeat of Rajput rulers was on account of the fact,which is exhibited by the recital of Turk aggressors that there is the survival of the fittest.

There was no morality in the Hindu army and as such the Invader rulers defeated them. The

main reasons for the defeat were the caste system and idol worships prevalent at the relevant

time. The intellectuals were side tracked and the society was divided into much segmentation

in which Kshatriya only were considered to be the fighting class amongst the Hindus. Hindu

Religion was based on diversity of different caste, Creed, Sects and Multiplicity of Religion

The citizens were having the orthodox feeling and they were very much living under the


32/88

domination of superstitions. This was the reason that the Hindus were subjected to the cruelty

by the foreign invaders.

60. That the Kutubuddin Aibak appointed a Invader governor upon Ajmer. Heexpanded the territory of Mohammed Guari to Meerut, Jhansi, Kol, and Runthambor. He

converted many temples into Invader Mosques at Gwalior and Anhilvada. Bakhtiyaruddin

Khilji invaded Bengal at the time of Kutubbuddin. There were many rulers namely Aalathmus,

Razia Sultana, Naseeruddin Mohammed, Tuglaq Khan, and ultimately Jalaluddin Khilji came

to the power. But his real nephew and son-in-law Allauddin Khilji trapped him and killed as a

traitor. He committed the murder of Jallaluddins sons namely Aktali khan and Rukunniddin.

This Allauddin after getting his enemy killed became the ruler to control the governance of the

occupied territory. There was the stability in respect of the price of food grains. The cow was

sold at one by third cost of the goat during his period. However Alluaddin died in the year of

1316 A.D.

61. That the starting of Gayasuddin Tuglaq and after his death one MohammedTuqlaq who was called as a symbol of many contradictions at the same time he was intelligent

and cruel while on the other hand he was a religious and lunatic but he was called as

unfortunate idealistic who shifted his capital from Delhi to Devgiri at Daulatabad .The

successor of Mahmmaed Tuglaq was Feroz Tuglaq who developed the government farm and

made the invention for the rotation of the crops. He converted many Hindu monuments and all

these monument description is described at Fatauath- e-ferozshahi .The cities were known as

Feroza, Ferozabad, Hissar, Jaunpur and Fatehabad during his time period. He created a army of

the slaves comprising of about one lakh eighty thousand people belonging to the inhabitant of

the same place where he was the conqueror. After the end of Tuglaq dynasty the Taimur

dynasty completely vanished the remains of Tuglaq rluers. However soon the Taimur dynasty

appointed Khijr Khan as there representative who created Syed regime. It has been said by the

great German philosopher Gete that the success and the defeat are the part of the same coin as


33/88

the joy and sorrow are reactionary and the unity is disintegrity are the reflections of the same

quality. This was also the reason that after Mohhamed tuglaq there was the extinction of

Invader dynasty and there was the beginning of Hindu rulers at Vijaynagar.

62. That the correspondent of BBC, London Times, Derspegel, New YorkTimes ,Washington Post ,Christian Science ,Monitor Times and life weeklys continue to

misrepresent these Hindu Building as that of Invader origin. The freedom of expression

continues to ruthlessly suppress the truth about these historical buildings belonging to the pre-

Invader origin. These Historian have meticulously calculatively kept their readership ignorant

regarding the truth of preexisting palaces and temple prior to declare them the building as

Invader monuments.

63. That now our government has provided the restriction for taking even thephotograph of the prominent historical buildings in India under the guise of archeological

department as to maintain the status quo regarding the falsehood created by the historian and to

avoid the alleged animosity between the majority class of the Hindu with the minority Invader.

It has been revealed by Encyclopaedias Islamia that the Arabia itself obliterated all its past

history by destroying image before the foundation of Islam. The origin of Kaba which is the

central shrine is in itself a Hindu temple surrounded by huge shrine consisting of 360 HIndu

images belonging to Indian king Vikarmaaditya who founded them in 58 B.C. Even the word

Allah is a Sanskrit word signifies Mother or goddess while mekha (Makka) in Sanskritsignifies a sacrificial fire of Vedic worship prevalent during the pre Islamic days. The

monuments have not only been destroyed in the peninsula of arvasthan belonging to King

Vikramaditya, which was captured by the Arabian during the Islamic invasion. The intriguing

aspect of regarding the existence of Shivalinga in Kaba shrine in Mecca is well known as sun-

gay aswad that is of black stone. It is still a misfortunate part on the majority of Hindu Citizens

that the income collected from the temples of Karnataka is distributed to about 80% of its


34/88

share to the Haze piligrimage, where there is the slaughtering of the 2500 cows and camale as

that of the rituals.

64. That the poetic composition of pre Islamic Arabian poets kept in famous librarycalled as Makahtab-e-Sultania in Istambul in turkey contains the biographic details of these pre

Islamic construction while the second part embodies the period beginning just after prohphet

Mohammaed upto the end of Vanee- umaya dynasty resembling the Sanskrit name of

Krishnayya voice. There has been a big signboard few mile away from Mecca banning the

entry of any non Invader in the area. This signboard signifies the period shrine was stormed

and captured by the invader having their faith in Islam. The same position is visualized at

Azmer sharif where there is still the covering over the Shivalinga for which the Islamic

follower are strictly providing the vigilance as it may not be disclosed the existence of the

Temple of Lord Shiva. Thus it be go on searching the different historical facts with the open

eyes we will find that there are ample evidence to deflate the Indo- Saracenic architecture

theory bubble.

65. That there is thus a valid reason why Hindus are not in a position to produce anydocumentary evidence with regard to the Hindu origin of fort. Even then we maintain that if a

systematic archaeological excavation is undertaken inside the fort and if its dingy cellars and

basements are opened and scoured they may still reveal Sanskrit inscriptions and idols

smashed and buried by Invader occupiers. In fact whatever little and excavation has been made

has resulted in the recovery of horse and elephant statues. Yet taking things as they stand any

court of law will uphold the plea that Hindus have a valid reason for not being able to produce

any documentary proof.

66. That the Honble court will then ask the Anglo-Invader school to produce itsdocuments. That school too has not got even a shred of a document to prove that any one or

more Invader rulers built or rebuilt the fort. A hazy mention to that effect in a court flatterers


35/88

chronicler is no documentary proof. It is like you or we noting in our diaries that we built the

Houses of Parliament in London.

67. That the Apex court held in Ram Sharan Autyanuprasis case 1989 (Supp.) (1)SCC 251/AIR 1989 S. C. 549, that mens life is inclusive of his tradition, culture and heritage

and protection of that heritage in its full measure would certainly come within the encompass

of an expanded concept of Article 21 of the Constitution. It is the life- mission of the petitioner

to re-establish the truth with regard to the National and Important monuments having heritage

of Indian culture and values of Indian life.

68. That as per the discovery of the author Sri P. N. Oak, (contrary to the assertionsby the Aechiological Survey of India, in short ASI), the Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya, a Shiva

Temple raised (500 years before Sahahjahana became the Mogul ruler) by Raja Paramar Devs

Chief Minister, Salakshan, as per the Bateswar inscription stocked in the Lucknow Museum.

69. That during the turbulent time of Invader invasions from 712 A. D. to 1761 A. D., theedifice was raided plundered and desecrated a number of times. Ultimately it passed into the

hands of Raja Man Singh of Jaipur, who was a contemporary of the third generation Mogul

Emperor, Akbar. Man Singhs grand son, Jai Singh was the ruler of Jaipur, when Akbars grand

son, Shahjahan ruled in Agra and Delhi.

70. That consequently, Shahjahans own Court Chronicler, the Badshnama, written byhis own paid Court Chronicler, Mulla Abdul Hamid Lahori, emphatically mentions (on page

403 of vol. I, now kept in National Archives, New Delhi) that The mansion knows as RajaMan Singhs Manzil, at present owned by his grandson Jai Singh was selected for the burial of

Mumtaz and she was buried in it. The edifice kept with a dome is a spectacular wonder

monument. The true copy of the admission in Shahjahans own Badshnama, the original

persion script and its english translation publish in book written by Sri P. N. Oak i,e, Taj Mahal

is a Temple Palace which is also kept with the National Archives, New Delhi, is made

Annexure 9 and 10 (The transcription of the Persian passages in Roman script and the


36/88

corresponding English translation, of relevant pages only, which are record in chapter 2 of the

said book.)

71. That another contemporary document is Prince Aurangazabs letter to hisfather, emperor Shahjahana dtd. July-August 1652 A. D. pointing out how that Illustrious

mausoleum complex being very ancient had cracks and leaks at several places needed

extensive repairs. Prince Aurangazabs letter (quoted above) reporting that the tomb-complex

being very ancient had cracks and leaks in 1652 A. D. itself gives a lie to the ASIs notices

declaring that the Taj Mahal stood brand new 1652 A. D. The true copy of the PrinceAurangazabs letter written in Persian Language to his father, emperor Shahjahana dtd. July-

August 1652 A. D. and english translation are marked as Annexure-11 and 12(The

transcription of the Persian passages in Roman script and the corresponding English

translation, of relevant pages only, which are record in chapter 2 of the said book.)

72. That besides the above two Invader Court records of Shahjahans time, thesaid book of the author which runs into 360 pages with 86 photos and photocopies of above

two Invader documents another booklet titled The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya. A Siva Temple

presents 118 points of documentary as well as circumstantial photographic and other historic

evidences. Apart from the historical and documentary evidence, if there are some practical

considerations. Since it is claimed that Shahjahans great infatuation for Mumtaz impelled him

to raise a wonder edifice over her corpse the obvious cross-question would be? -Shahjahans

exclusive infatuation for Mumtaz is belied by the existence of his harem consisting over than

5000 women mentioned in authentic history books.

73. That another question would be that if Shahjahan loved Mumtaz so deeply whatexplains the total absence of any book of Shahjahan-Mumtaz love stories unlike Laila-Maznu,

Romio-Juliet romances? The fact is that Mumtaz was buried at Burhanpur, a place 600 miles

south of Agra. After 6 months the corpse is stated to have been lifted from there and re-buried

in the Taj Mahal temple palace. The true copy of the documentary proof in support thereof


37/88

forming part of the research work on Taj Mahal identity and authorship based on evidence

having direct proof of its authorshipwritten by Sri P.N. Oak having the discription of different

monuments regarding their authorship is filed as Annexure 13, 14 and 15.

74. That the truth hidden inside the four story building known as Taj Mahal is full ofmysterious circumstances as no where in the world. There may be the fourth floor of the

graveyards of Mumtaj and Sahajahan on the third and fourth floor of the alleged Muslim

monuments. Actually, even the archeological department, while diging the adjoining place

ment for Goushala, has found the crown of the deity worship by Hindus during pre-mughal

period, but in order to avoid the further repercussion resulting in to animosity by the Muslim

fundamentalist, this fact has been subsided again inside the earth. There has been the existence

of castle surrounding the building, which can not be there, except inside the palace ment for

the Rajputana Rulers. Since the entire treasury was given as endowment trust beneath the

foundation of the temple and Lord Shiva being the God of resembling to the sovereignty of the

judicial institution, was considered to have the over all superintendence of the expenditure

incurred by the rulers and as such the ingress and outgoes to the treasury was at the door step

below the feet of the temple. Thus while the upper story constructed through the marble stone

on the third and fourth floor was comprising of the temple of Lord Shiva, just beneath the

aforesaid temple where the visitors are allowed to reach there through the taress, was actually

the treasury chamber of Rajputana style living of Hindu Rulers.

75. That Ex- Maharaja of Jaipur has Kapad Dwara collection bearing Two orders(FARMANS) from Sahajahan dated Dec.18, 1633 (bearing morden Numbers R.176 and 177)

having the requisitioning the Tejo- Mahallyan Building from Raja Jai Singh through blatant

reward to him for fighting against Maharan Pratap Singh ,Mewar ruler by his father and

thereby got the usurpation of this Building. Subsequently Rajasthan State archives at Bikaner

preserves three Farmans address by Sahajahan to Raja Jai Singh to supply the Marble used for

Koranic Grafts from his Markana Querries, and also the Stone cutter. The cost of the


38/88

scaffolding was more than that of the cost of entire work. These farmans were issued after

about two years of death of Mumtaz, who was buried at Burhanpur, a place 600 miles south ofAgra. After 6 months the corpse is stated to have been lifted and there after these Farmans

were issued from there and re-buried in the Taj Mahal temple palace. The grafting Koranic

superimposition lettering in the Taj- mahal is of inferior quality and is pale white shade while

rest of the existing building was of rich yellow tint.

76. That even the rulers were guided by their Raj Guru living inside the forest meantfor providing education to princes, before admonition of the power of the sovereignty in their

hand. Thus every Hindu ruler was God fearing person and he was regarding the Brahmins

superior on the intellectual and other sa

Court Case File

Documents

Transcript of Court Case File