Corrosion Failures and Mitigation In Hydrided Environments · Corrosion Failures and Mitigation In...
Transcript of Corrosion Failures and Mitigation In Hydrided Environments · Corrosion Failures and Mitigation In...
9/24/2018
1
Corrosion Failures and MitigationIn Hydrided Environments
Dennis J. SchumerthASME Fellow & Principal
DBA Titanium Tubular Consultants
Cell 714-393-1013E-mail [email protected] , E-mail [email protected]
Web Site: TitaniumTubularConsultants.com
,
DISCLAIMER
The information and data contained herein are derived from a variety of sources which this author believes to be reliable. The use and application of the data and material contained within this presentation, either intended or implied, shall be the responsibility of the user and are not
intended as claims, warranties, either expressed or implied or fitness of purpose.Because it is not possible to anticipate specific uses and operating conditions, we urge you to
consult with technical service personnel on your particular application.
9/24/2018
2
presentation overview
Hydriding 101 CP TitaniumR50400
Superferritic SS(Sea Cure™ S44660)
What is it ???
TitaniumFormation of Brittle
Hydrides & Cracking
Superferritic SSFracture & Reduced
Ductility
Al & C. Steel Reduced Ductility &
Fracture
“Damaging” Condition in Metals Where the Solubility
Threshold of H2 is Exceeded
Result – Loss of Structural Integrity
9/24/2018
3
Hydriding 101
Hydriding 101 CP TitaniumR50400
Superferritic SS(Sea Cure™ S44660)
9/24/2018
4
Hydriding 101 CP TitaniumR50400
EFFECT of MOISTURE ABSORPTION on HYDROGEN
% H20 Hydrogen Pickup (ppm)
0 4.4800.5 51,0001.0 7002.0 73.3 105.3 17
10.2 1122.5 037.5 056.2 0600oF (316oC @ 800 psi – 96 Hours Exposure
Superferritic SS(Sea Cure™ S44660)
Hydriding 101 CP TitaniumR50400
Superferritic SS(Sea Cure™ S44660)
9/24/2018
5
Hydriding 101Susceptible Materials
CP TitaniumR50400
Aluminum C. Steel Ferritic SS Titanium
anodic cathodic
Superferritic SS(Sea Cure™ S44660)
case studies
9/24/2018
6
Case Study 1
Sea water cooling Gr. 2 ASTM B-338 titanium tubing Manual control IC system SCE voltage range: Est. @ -1.5 -2.0V 3000 ppm (est.) breakthrough saturation
Observations (Ref: IJPGC & NACE)
Laboratory testing confirms hydriding of Gr. 2 titanium does not occur up to potentials of -1.20VSCE
Under the same testing, hydride layers are detected at potentials of greater than > -1.20VSCE
Actual operating potentials estimated @ - 1.60VSCE to - 2.00VSCE
Predicted threshold potential for hydrogen @ -1.20 VSCE to - 1.40 VSCE
Residual stress (typ) influences hydride phase orientation but does not effect hydrogen absorption or penetration rate No thru-wall failures Mechanical testing OK.
Mitigation
Seal affected tubes System uprate to Automatic Potential Control
Case Study 2 Ref: (EPRI & CSC)
Sea water cooling ASTM B-338 Gr. 2 titanium tubing Peripheral titanium tube hydriding Localized tube cracking & deposits on protruding tube ends Calcium and magnesium deposits (calcareous) = pH Δ Excessive CP voltages OE-installed tubesheet and waterbox coating Waterbox isolation during tidal swings Lack of preventative maintenance program
9/24/2018
7
Case Study 2
Reasonable IC set points
Attack and rupture in HAZ Attack in parent metal Little to no attack in the weld zone
INITIAL DESIGN SET POINTS
TUBESHEET ‐0.7 to ‐0.9 V Ag/AgCl
WATERBOX ‐1.0 V Ag/AgCl
Case Study 2
Mitigation Recommendations
Completed Titanium Rebuild All Welded – No Protruding Tube Ends Implement Best Practices Tube Cleaning
Recommended Updated, Auto Potential IC System Set Points @ ≤ - 0.90VSCE to -1.0VSCE
Regular Instrument Calibration Periodic Replacement of Control Cards Individual Waterbox Rectifiers
NOTE: Client ultimately opted to remove all IC recommendationsrelying only on the titanium tube/t.s. interface and waterbox coating.
9/24/2018
8
Case Study 3
Observations
Sea water cooling Tube material: Superferritic SS - Sea Cure ® (UNS-44660) Multiple failure characteristics
Mid-span chloride pitting corrosion (unrelated to hydriding)Disintegrated tube endsTube fractures w/i tubesheet & extending Into unexpanded area
Confirmed hydriding thru RFT EC
Case Study 3
Observations
Tube cracking in or near tubesheet Disintegrated tube ends Failure mechanism + CP potentials @ > - .80V SCE
9/24/2018
9
Case Study 3
Mitigation
Remedy: stabilizing sleeves
Install automatic CP potentials @ < - .80V SCE
Final solution: Unit(s) demolished in 2010 for replacement facility
Sidebar Commentary
Bright Anneal or Open-Air/Pickle PWHT Produced Material Exhibit
Similar Hydriding Tendencies
Case Study 4
Observations
Gr. 2 B-338 Titanium Early 80’s Installation Muntz Metal Tubesheets Hydrogen Analysis – Plant “X” Protruding Tube End Sections
Discovery
Tube End Fracture Overzealous IC System Identified Aggressive Tube Cleaner Operation Caused End Fractures ???
Mitigation
Upgrade IC System (proposed)
Trim Tube Ends (proposed)
Stabilize Sleeve Damaged Tubes (proposed)
Sample ID H2 Content (ppm) Sample 1: 1365 ppm Sample 2: 1593 ppm Sample 3: 1624 ppm Sample 4: 1672 ppm ASTM Max. Allowed 150 New Tubes Typical < 100 ppm
9/24/2018
10
Titanium Tubing
“Random, Longitudinal, OD-Initiated, Hydride Assisted Tube Cracking”
What’ happening ?????Holy WaterMinor hydride needles present Hydrides appear to align radially direction under a stress field Vibration ruled out No IC or sacrificial system present to generate hydrogen Radiolithic hydrogen ruled out Residual Stress levels normal (10 – 15 ksi)
What it really is ??????Crack propagation from “scratches” imparted during retube 35 years ago……
Hydriding Facts, Myths & Misnomers
Hydriding Facts, Myths & Misnomers
Superferritic SS & C. Steel Tubing
Bend Ductility in Hydrogen-Charged Tubes can be Reversible in Superferritic & Alloy SteelPredicated on Immediate and Permanent Removal of Hydrogen Source
REVERSAL CONDITION NOT POSSIBLEIN CRACKED OR DAMAGED TUBES
Superferritic Structure Appear More Prone to Hydrogen-Induced Failure
Titanium Structure Appears Less Prone to Hydrogen Induced Failure
Suggested Damage ThresholdSuperferritic SCE Threshold Levels: - 0.90 VSCE but more approaching - 0.80 VSCE
Titanium SCE Threshold Levels at -1.20 VSCE to - 1.40 VSCE
What’s Been Reported
What's Also Been Documented
Lazarus Effect ??
What's Not Been Reported
“xxx”
9/24/2018
11
Hydriding…..how to check for it???
Destructive Analysis
Surface Replication (Comparison) Process )
Visual Inspection (I.E., White, Calcareous, Flowered Appearance Powder)
Color Change to Gray or Silvery Appearance
Check IC or CP System
ID EC may be Performed – ID Wall Thinning is Not Typical
SEM can Identify the Fracture Morphology
Hydriding May be Associated With Higher Levels of Stress Concentration
Hydriding….How to Avoid it???
Proper equipment design
Eliminate detrimental galvanic couples
Individual rectifiers are recommended for each waterbox
Consistent, accountable maintenance programs
Anodes: Cast iron or aluminum preferred. Zinc is O.K.
Magnesium should be avoided due to its high negative potential
Anodes should not be placed closer than 30 inches from the tubesheet
9/24/2018
12
Varying CP systems polarization limits to one value at the tubesheet and another value at the waterbox/channel may be ideal but due to condenser dynamics…..all but impossible and ultimately…… “Rube Goldbergish”
Anodes should be selected to produce negative potentials of:≤ - 0.80VSCE maximum for ferritic stainless steels ≤ - 0.90VSCE to -1.0VSCE for titanium
Cautionary Note: EC signals may resemble wall loss but actually represents a change in material resistivity
One Case Study the condenser was completely upgraded without the benefit of either an IC or sacrificial system rather relying entirely in the integrity of a full waterbox coating
Most if not all fractures occur at protruding ends – tube/t.s. interface
EPRI NDE testing continues to identify hydriding
Pitfalls & Lessons Learned
References 1. Fulford, J. Paul, FP&L Juno Beach, Schutz, Ronald, TIMET, Lisenbey, Robert, FP&L Juno Beach. (St. Lucie Unit 1 and Turkey Point Unit
CHARACTERIZATION OF TITANIUM CONDENSER TUBE HYDRIDING AT TWO FLORIDA POWER and LIGHT COMPANY PLANTS – Addcontributions by Grauman, James, TIMET, Collard, Steve, Heise, Wolfgang, Joseph, Mark and Newman, Randy, (FP&L) - ASME Paper 1981 (87-JPGCF)
2. Schutz, R.W. and Grauman, J.S., TIMET Division - Determination of Cathodic Potential Limits for Prevention of Titanium Tube Hydride Embrittlement inSaltwater - NACE 89- Paper 110
3. Nekoksa. George, Corrosion Failure Analysis and Gutherman, Brian, Florida Power Corporation - Test Results From Electrochemical Exposure Racks aCrystal River Nuclear Power Plant - NACE 91 – Paper 275
4. Radmerski, L.S., Colt Industries, Eckenrod, J.J., and Pinnow, K.E., Colt Industries and Kovach, C.W., Colt Industries, Trent Tube Division - Cathodic Protection of Seawater-Cooled Powerplant Condenser Operating with High Performance Ferritic Stainless Steel Tubing - NACE 85 – Paper 208
5. Grubb, J.F., Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp - Hydrogen Embrittlement of Superferritic Stainless Steels – Paper 8410-028 6. Kovach, C.W., and Redmond, J.D., TMR - Experience with High Performance Stainless Steel tubing in Power Plant Condensers - NACE 91 – Paper 507. TIMET Publication – “Corrosion Resistance of Titanium”, January, 1999 8. Schumerth, D.J., Valtimet - et’ al’ - Valtimet Publication – TITANIUM TUBING DESIGN and FABRICATION HANDBOOK – 2003 9. Det Norske Veritas, May, 2009 - The Evaluation of Main Condenser Cathodic Protection
System at Point Lepreau Generating Station 10. RPC Report J39581 - Assessment of Hydriding on Ti-Condenser 11. Land, Nick - Evaluation of Failed Sea Cure Condenser Tubes From Port Everglades Unit 3, 1999, Land, Nick - FPL Test Report JPS-DSR-3974 12. Nishina, Dean, Executive Director – Hawaii Electric - HECO Division of Consumer Advocacy Position Statement – November 18, 2010 Docket Twenty No. 2010-0126 13. Fulford, P., and Peroni, B., Ferritic Stainless Steel Tube Problems at the Cape Canaveral and Port Everglades Station - EPRI Seminar – CS 4329-SR (114. Land, Nick, and Schoolery, Dave, Research and Evaluation Laboratory – Power Delivery Services – Evaluate Failed Sea-Cure Condenser Tube from Po
Everglades Plant –FP&L Test Report JPS-DRS-3974 15. Christensen Materials Engineering Report March 21, 2012. Hawaii Electric (HECO), Kahe 1, Condenser 12 16. Hartt, W.H., Liu, L., Fatigue Properties of Hydrided Titanium Condenser Tubes - NACE, 1992 17. Divi, S.C., Grauman, J., Examination of a Cracked Grade 2 Titanium Surry Unit Main Condenser Tube - TIMET Report – October, 2011 18. Schumerth, D.J., Valtimet, Inc. - Titanium Powerplant Surface Condenser Tubing – 40
Years and 600,000,000 ft later, EnergyTech Magazine (ASME Publication) – June, 2011, Titanium Still Going Strong After 40 Years, Power Magazine July, 2011
19. Kostrivsas, A., Smith, L.S., Gittos, M.F., TWI Ltd, Cambridge, UK – Sustained Load Cracking in Titanium Alloys 10th World Conference on Titanium 13-July, Hamburg, Germany
20. Hydrogen Embrittlement in Titanium and Superferritic Stainless Steel Steam Surface Condenser Tubing, D.Schumerth, TTC & Thomas Demers, NP Power: EPRI and CSC Publications 2013
1. Fulford, J. Paul, FP&L Juno Beach, Schutz, Ronald, TIMET, Lisenbey, Robert, FP&L Juno Beach. (St. Lucie Unit 1 and Turkey Point Unit
CHARACTERIZATION OF TITANIUM CONDENSER TUBE HYDRIDING AT TWO FLORIDA POWER and LIGHT COMPANY PLANTS – Addcontributions by Grauman, James, TIMET, Collard, Steve, Heise, Wolfgang, Joseph, Mark and Newman, Randy, (FP&L) - ASME Paper 1981 (87-JPGCF)
2. Schutz, R.W. and Grauman, J.S., TIMET Division - Determination of Cathodic Potential Limits for Prevention of Titanium Tube Hydride Embrittlement inSaltwater - NACE 89- Paper 110
3. Nekoksa. George, Corrosion Failure Analysis and Gutherman, Brian, Florida Power Corporation - Test Results From Electrochemical Exposure Racks aCrystal River Nuclear Power Plant - NACE 91 – Paper 275
4. Radmerski, L.S., Colt Industries, Eckenrod, J.J., and Pinnow, K.E., Colt Industries and Kovach, C.W., Colt Industries, Trent Tube Division - Cathodic Protection of Seawater-Cooled Powerplant Condenser Operating with High Performance Ferritic Stainless Steel Tubing - NACE 85 – Paper 208
5. Grubb, J.F., Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp - Hydrogen Embrittlement of Superferritic Stainless Steels – Paper 8410-028 6. Kovach, C.W., and Redmond, J.D., TMR - Experience with High Performance Stainless Steel tubing in Power Plant Condensers - NACE 91 – Paper 507. TIMET Publication – “Corrosion Resistance of Titanium”, January, 1999 8. Schumerth, D.J., Valtimet - et’ al’ - Valtimet Publication – TITANIUM TUBING DESIGN and FABRICATION HANDBOOK – 2003 9. Det Norske Veritas, May, 2009 - The Evaluation of Main Condenser Cathodic Protection
System at Point Lepreau Generating Station 10. RPC Report J39581 - Assessment of Hydriding on Ti-Condenser 11. Land, Nick - Evaluation of Failed Sea Cure Condenser Tubes From Port Everglades Unit 3, 1999, Land, Nick - FPL Test Report JPS-DSR-3974 12. Nishina, Dean, Executive Director – Hawaii Electric - HECO Division of Consumer Advocacy Position Statement – November 18, 2010 Docket Twenty No. 2010-0126 13. Fulford, P., and Peroni, B., Ferritic Stainless Steel Tube Problems at the Cape Canaveral and Port Everglades Station - EPRI Seminar – CS 4329-SR (114. Land, Nick, and Schoolery, Dave, Research and Evaluation Laboratory – Power Delivery Services – Evaluate Failed Sea-Cure Condenser Tube from Po
Everglades Plant –FP&L Test Report JPS-DRS-3974 15. Christensen Materials Engineering Report March 21, 2012. Hawaii Electric (HECO), Kahe 1, Condenser 12 16. Hartt, W.H., Liu, L., Fatigue Properties of Hydrided Titanium Condenser Tubes - NACE, 1992 17. Divi, S.C., Grauman, J., Examination of a Cracked Grade 2 Titanium Surry Unit Main Condenser Tube - TIMET Report – October, 2011 18. Schumerth, D.J., Valtimet, Inc. - Titanium Powerplant Surface Condenser Tubing – 40
Years and 600,000,000 ft later, EnergyTech Magazine (ASME Publication) – June, 2011, Titanium Still Going Strong After 40 Years, Power Magazine July, 2011
19. Kostrivsas, A., Smith, L.S., Gittos, M.F., TWI Ltd, Cambridge, UK – Sustained Load Cracking in Titanium Alloys 10th World Conference on Titanium 13-July, Hamburg, Germany
20. Hydrogen Embrittlement in Titanium and Superferritic Stainless Steel Steam Surface Condenser Tubing, D.Schumerth, TTC & Thomas Demers, NP Power: EPRI and CSC Publications 2013
9/24/2018
13
Thank you for your attention
Dennis J. SchumerthASME Fellow & Principal
DBA Titanium Tubular Consultants
Cell 714-393-1013E-mail [email protected] , E-mail [email protected]
Web Site: TitaniumTubularConsultants.com
,