Cormen Algo-lec7

8/14/2019 Cormen Algo-lec7

1/26

October 3, 2005 Copyright 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson L7.1

Introduction to Algorithms

6.046J/18.401J

LECTURE 7Hashing I

Direct-access tables

Resolving collisions bychaining

Choosing hash functions

Open addressing

Prof. Charles E. Leiserson


2/26


Symbol-table problem

Symbol table Sholding n records:

recordxkey[x]

key[x]

Otherfieldscontaining

satellite data

Operations on S:

INSERT(S,x)

DELETE(S,x) SEARCH(S, k)

How should the data structure Sbe organized?


3/26


Direct-access table

IDEA: Suppose that the keys are drawn fromthe set U {0, 1, , m1}, and keys aredistinct. Set up an array T[0 . . m1]:

T[k] =x ifx Kand key[x] = k,

NIL otherwise.Then, operations take (1) time.

Problem: The range of keys can be large: 64-bit numbers (which represent

18,446,744,073,709,551,616 different keys),

character strings (even larger!).


4/26October 3, 2005 Copyright 2001-5 by Erik D. Demaine and Charles E. Leiserson L7.4

Hash functions

Solution: Use a hash function h to map theuniverse Uof all keys into

{0, 1, , m1}:

U

S

k1

k2 k3

k4k5

0

m1

h(k1)

h(k4)

h(k2)

h(k3)

T

= h(k5)

As each key is inserted, h maps it to a slot ofT.When a record to be inserted maps to an alreadyoccupied slot in T, a collision occurs.



Resolving collisions by

chaining Link records in the same slot into a list.

h(49) = h(86) = h(52) = i

T

4949 8686 5252

Worst case:

Every key

hashes to thesame slot.

Access time =

(n) if|S| = n

i


6/26



Search cost

The expected time for an unsuccessfulsearch for a record with a given key is

= (1 + ).


8/26


9/26


Search cost

The expected time for an unsuccessfulsearch for a record with a given key is

= (1 + ).

apply hash functionand access slot

searchthe list

Expected search time = (1) if = O(1),

or equivalently, ifn = O(m).


10/26


11/26


Choosing a hash function

The assumption of simple uniform hashing

is hard to guarantee, but several commontechniques tend to work well in practice aslong as their deficiencies can be avoided.

Desirata:

A good hash function should distribute the

keys uniformly into the slots of the table. Regularity in the key distribution should

not affect this uniformity.


12/26


Division method

Assume all keys are integers, and define

h(k) = kmod m.

Deficiency: Dont pick an m that has a smalldivisord. A preponderance of keys that arecongruent modulo

dcan adversely affect

uniformity.

h(k)

Extreme deficiency: Ifm = 2r, then the hash

doesnt even depend on all the bits ofk:

Ifk= 10110001110110102 and r= 6, then

h(k) = 0110102 .


13/26


Division method (continued)

h(k) = kmod m.

Pickm to be a prime not too close to a powerof2 or10 and not otherwise used prominentlyin the computing environment.

Annoyance: Sometimes, making the table size a prime is

inconvenient.But, this method is popular, although the nextmethod well see is usually superior.


14/26


Multiplication method

Assume that all keys are integers, m = 2r, and ourcomputer has w-bit words. Define

h(k) = (Akmod 2w) rsh (wr),

where rsh is the bitwise right-shift operator and

A is an odd integer in the range 2w1


15/26


Multiplication method

example

4

0

35

2617

Modular wheel

h(k) = (Akmod 2w) rsh (wr)

Suppose that m = 8 = 23

and that our computerhas w = 7-bit words:

1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1

= A= k

h(k) A ..2A

..

3A

..

R l i lli i b


16/26


Resolving collisions by open

addressingNo storage is used outside of the hash table itself.

Insertion systematically probes the table until anempty slot is found.

The hash function depends on both the key and

probe number:h : U {0, 1, , m1} {0, 1, , m1}.

The probe sequence h(k,0), h(k,1), , h(k,m1)should be a permutation of{0, 1, , m1}. The table may fill up, and deletion is difficult (but

not impossible).


17/26


18/26


Example of open addressing

Insert key k= 496:

0. Probe h(496,0)586133

204

481

T0

collision1. Probe h(496,1) 586

m1


19/26



Insert key k= 496:

0. Probe h(496,0)586133

204

481

T0

1. Probe h(496,1)

496

2. Probe h(496,2)

insertion

m1


20/26



Search for key k= 496:

0. Probe h(496,0)586133

204

481

T0

m1

1. Probe h(496,1)

496

2. Probe h(496,2)

Search uses the same probesequence, terminating suc-cessfully if it finds the key

and unsuccessfully if it encounters an empty slot.


21/26


Probing strategies

Linear probing:

Given an ordinary hash function h(k), linearprobing uses the hash function

h(k,i) = (h(k) + i) mod m.This method, though simple, suffers fromprimaryclustering, where long runs of occupied slots build

up, increasing the average search time. Moreover,the long runs of occupied slots tend to get longer.


22/26


Probing strategies

Double hashing

Given two ordinary hash functions h1(k) and h2(k),double hashing uses the hash function

h(k,i) = (h1(k) + i

h2(k)) mod m.This method generally produces excellent results,

but h2(k) must be relatively prime to m. One way

is to make m a power of2 and design h2(k) toproduce only odd numbers.


23/26


Analysis of open addressing

We make the assumption ofuniform hashing:

Each key is equally likely to have any one ofthe m!permutations as its probe sequence.

Theorem. Given an open-addressed hashtable with load factor = n/m < 1, theexpected number of probes in an unsuccessfulsearch is at most 1/(1).


24/26


Proof of the theorem

Proof. At least one probe is always necessary.

With probability n/m, the first probe hits anoccupied slot, and a second probe is necessary.

With probability (n1)/(m1), the second probe

hits an occupied slot, and a third probe isnecessary.

With probability (n2)/(m2), the third probehits an occupied slot, etc.

=

Cormen Algo-lec7

Documents

Transcript of Cormen Algo-lec7