Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

31
Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles Leonhard Dobusch Freie Universität Berlin – School of Business & Economics ESRC Workshop Series ‚Digital Policy: Connectivity, Creativity and Rights’ November 22, 2012, Vienna

description

Talk given at the ESRC Workshop Series 'Digital Policy: Connectivity, Creativity and Rights', November 22, 2012, Vienna

Transcript of Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Page 1: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Leonhard DobuschFreie Universität Berlin – School of Business & Economics

ESRC Workshop Series‚Digital Policy: Connectivity, Creativity and Rights’

November 22, 2012, Vienna

Page 2: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Using content online: legal or illegal?

Fair Use on YouTube and in Wikipedia

Private resolution of public problems?

Page 3: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Using content online: legal or illegal?

Page 4: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

1970s: Violate copyrights!

2000s: Don‘t violate copyrights!

Page 6: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Do copyright experts know?

Page 7: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Online usage End-user Intermediarywatching/listening/reading

Is the source legal? Is watching/listening/reading from an illegal source legal?

Is providing tools for watching/listening/reading legal?

linking Is linking to (illegal) content legal?

Is providing the tools for linking to content legal?

storing/offering Is storing/offering the content legal?

Is providing tools for storing/offering (illegal) content legal?

interacting/creating online

Is interacting/creating with the content online legal?

Is providing tools for interacting/creating with online content legal?

Regulatory Uncertainty: Questions

Source: Dobusch, L./Quack, S. (2012): Transnational Copyright: Misalignments between Regulation, Business Models and User Practice. Osgoode CLPE Research Paper Series, 8 (4), Research Paper No. 13, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2116334

Page 8: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Regime Forums Regulatory OutcomeInternational treaties

WTO, UN/WIPO TRIPS treaty, WCT, WPPT, ACTA, TPP

(Supra-)national law

EU, national legislative bodies

EU copyright directives, national laws

Private regulation via standards

Industry networks, standard setters

Digital Rights Management, Open Content Licensing

Regime Complexity in Copyright

Source: Dobusch, L./Quack, S. (2012): Transnational Copyright: Misalignments between Regulation, Business Models and User Practice. Osgoode CLPE Research Paper Series, 8 (4), Research Paper No. 13, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2116334

Page 9: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Online usage End-user Intermediarywatching/listening/reading

- RIAA v. Diamond (“Rio case”, 1998)

linking Intellectual Reserve v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry (1999)Universal City Studios v. Corley (2001)

A&M Records v. Napster (2001)Arista v. Lime Wire (2010)

storing/offering e.g. Warner v. DeWitt (2007) or Interscope v. Rodriguez (2007)

Viacom v. YouTube (2007)GEMA v. RapidShare (2010)

interacting/creating online

Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. (2008)Sapient v. Geller (2008)

Warner Bros. Entertainment et al. v. RDR Books et al. (2008)

Regulatory Uncertainty: Case Law

Source: Dobusch, L./Quack, S. (2012): Transnational Copyright: Misalignments between Regulation, Business Models and User Practice. Osgoode CLPE Research Paper Series, 8 (4), Research Paper No. 13, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2116334

Page 10: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Illegal in spite of substantial proportion of non-infringing practices?

Arista v. Limewire (2010)A&M Records v. Napster (2001)

Page 11: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Legal in spite of substantial proportion of infringing practices?

Viacom v. YouTube (2007)

Page 12: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Fair Use on YouTube and in Wikipedia

Page 13: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Members shall confine limitations and exceptions to exclusive rights to certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rights holder.

”Article 13, TRIPS Agreement

Page 14: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

„Fair Use“

General Clause

Page 15: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Exceptions and Limitations to Copyright

Closed List

Page 16: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Example: Transformative Consumption

Page 17: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Im Hintergrund: Prince - Let‘s Go Crazy

Transformative Werknutzung

Video: Holden Lenz Dancing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1KfJHFWlhQ

Page 18: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles
Page 19: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles
Page 20: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Example: Amateur Art

Page 22: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

?

Page 24: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Example: Thumbnails in Wikipedia

Page 25: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles
Page 26: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles
Page 27: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Private resolution of public problems?

Page 28: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Platforms decide what to consider as (il)legal

Page 29: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Regime Forums Regulatory OutcomeInternational treaties

WTO, UN/WIPO TRIPS treaty, WCT, WPPT

(Supra-)national law

EU, national legislative bodies

EU copyright directives, national laws

Private regulation via standards

Industry networks, standard setters

Digital Rights Management, Open Content Licensing

Growing importance of private regulatory layer

Page 30: Copyright and Fair Use: Transnational Troubles

Uncertainty in copyright is going to last

Enabling uncertainty of fair use preferrable to prohibiting certainty

Scope of fair use is re-negotiated by regulatory practices of non-state actors

Conclusions