Contract between USDA Wildlife Services and Mamaroneck NY May-Sept 2013

7/28/2019 Contract between USDA Wildlife Services and Mamaroneck NY May-Sept 2013

1/77

Village of Mamaroneck123 Mamaroneck Ave., Mamaroneck, NY 10543

ph: (914) 777-7700

Board of Trustees Agenda

Discussion of Topics

Board of Trustees Work Session - April 1, 2013Regatta Conference Room

5:30 PM

Open Meeting

1. Discussion Items

A. Rescheduled review of USDA Contract for Goose Control with Ken Preusser

B. Presentation by Sportime on bubble replacement and proposal to have top-translucentbubbles to replace the existing bubbles

C. LWRP update status - Les Steinman

D. Discussion with Daniel Margoshes, Chair of the Budget Committee regarding what rolethe Board would like the Committee to play in the upcoming Budget process.

E. Draft proposed changes to the Sidewalk Cafe law; covering time frame, and theallowance for outside music.

F. Discussion of adoption of property values subsequent to Town of Mamaroneck Reval;would also have to adopt Town of Rye values too.

G. Bond Resolution for replacement of sewer main on Jefferson Avenue as part of theJefferson Avenue Bridge project.

H. Scheduling Alarm Code appeal hearing for April 15, 2013 Work Session

2. Action items

A. Authorization for progress payment on Jefferson Avenue Bridge project

3. Items for ext Regular Meeting

A. Bid Results Contract 2013-06 - New HVAC Installation at 169 Mt. Pleasant Avenue

B. Bid Results Contract 2013-07 - Pavilion Roof Replacement Project

C. Budget Amendment to appropriate money for 234 Stanley Avenue oil tank andremediation

D. Disposal of surplus vehicles by auction

E. Budget Amendment for FEMA and OEM monies for Hurricane Sandy (revenues).

Adjourn


2/77

Village of Mamaroneck, Y

Item Title: Rescheduled review of USDA Contract for Goose Control with Ken Preusser

Item Summary: Rescheduled review of USDA Contract for Goose Control with Ken Preusser

Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:

USDA.pdf USDA


3/77


4/77


5/77


6/77


7/77


8/77


9/77


10/77


11/77


12/77


13/77


14/77


15/77


Item Title: Presentation by Sportime on bubble replacement and proposal to have top-translucentbubbles to replace the existing bubbles

ItemSummary:

Presentation by Sportime on bubble replacement and proposal to have top-translucentbubbles to replace the existing bubbles

Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:

Sportime_VOM_April_1_2013.pdf S T

Sportime_Light_Transmission_Letter_4-1-2013.pdf st memo


16/77

SPORTIME HARBORISLAND

LONG TERM LICENSEPROJECT OPTIONS


17/77

OPTION A

New LocationBehind Water Treatment Plant


18/77

OPTION A


19/77

OPTION A


20/77

OPTION A


21/77

0

OPTION A


22/77

OPTION B1(VOM MUNICIPAL FINANCING)

&OPTION B2 (SPORTIME FINANCING)

Existing Location


23/77

OPTIONS B1 and B2


24/77

OPTIONS B1 and B2OPTIONS B1 and B2


25/77

OPTIONS B1 and B2


26/77

PTIONS B1 and B2


27/77

OPTIONS B1 and B2


28/77

Comparative Fact Sheet

Opens ParkClubhouse Size

(square feet)

Features/

Improvements andCapital Cost

Projected LicenseFees over 20

Years

County EasemeIssue

Option A

New LocationBehind Water

Treatment Plant

VOM Municipal

Financing

Yes7,200

(2 levels, 3,600each)

Full Rink toAccommodate

Adult and JuniorMulti-SportPrograms

9 Tennis Courts /

$9 Million

$11,079,055

No easementimpact on

clubhouse, rink3 tennis courts;tennis courts a

risk from twoeasements

Option B1

Current Location

VOM Municipal

FinancingNo 3,900

11 TennisCourts /

$3 Million

$10,804,514


clubhouse or 8tennis courts

3 tennis courts

risk from oneeasement

Option B2

Current Location

SPORTIME

Financing No 3,900

11 TennisCourts /

$3 Million$9,804,514


clubhouse or 8tennis courts

3 tennis courts risk from one

easement


29/77

Economic Comparison Options A, B1 and B220-Year Projection

Project

Option A

New Location

Behind Water

Treatment Plant

VOM Municipal

Financing

Option B1

Existing Location

VOM Municipal

Financing

Option B2

Existing Location

SPORTIME

Financing

Estimated Construction Cost $7 Million $3 Million $3 Million

Additional Park Improvements atSPORTIMEs Cost

$2 million 0 0

Projected Gross Revenues $145,387,778 $127,448,778 $127,448,778

Projected Net Income $28,921,945 $28,082,436 $25,924,629

Base Annual License Fee to

Village (Guaranteed) $325,000 $400,000 $350,000

Projected Additional AnnualLicense Fees starting at 10% ofGross Revenues above $5M:

$4,579,055 $2,804,514 $2,804,514

Projected Total License Fees toVillage /

(% of net income)

$11,079,055

(38.3%)

$10,804,514

(38.5%)

$9,804,514

(37.8%)

Projected Sportime Income / (%of net income)

$17,842,940

(61.7%)

$17,277,922

(61.5%)

$16,120,115

(62.2%)


30/77

License Fees/Net Income Comparison5-Year Historical vs. First Five Years Projected

VOM

5-year historical annualavg. / % of Net Income

$361,058 / 33.1%

SPORTIME

5-year historical annualavg. / % of Net Income

$731,049 / 66.9%

Option A

New Location

Behind Water

Treatment Plant

Option B1

Existing Location

VOM Municipal

Financing

Option B2

Existing Location

SPORTIME

Financing

VOM

5-year projected annualavg. / % of Net Income

$373,293 / 63.3%($325,000 GuaranteedAnnual License Fee)

$411,322 / 39.8%($400,000 GuaranteedAnnual License Fee)

$361,322 / 40.6($350,000 GuaranteAnnual License Fe

SPORTIME

5-year projected annualavg. / % of Net Income

$216,318 / 36.7% $621,610 / 60.2% $528,823 / 59.4


31/77

SPORTIME HARBORISLAND

LONG TERM LICENSEPROJECT OPTIONS


32/77

11880 Dorsett Rd, St Louis, MO 63043| Main: (800) 325.1303 | Fax: (314) 739.1556

www.arizonstructures.com

February 25, 2013

Ben Schlansky

Sportime Facilities

One Randall's IslandNew York, NY 10035

RE: Building Light Transmission

Dear Ben,

I understand you are looking for information about the light transmission through the envelope of our air supported

structures with regard to the replacement structure at your Harbor Island facility. Using that structure design for

indoor tennis, the indirect 1000 watt metal halide lighting system, and translucent fabric for the dome I haveestimated the light transmission through the dome. My resulting calculated light intensity at the surface of the dome

is123 lux. This is roughly equal to a dimly lit room or a very dark overcast day.

The interior light fixtures are 1000 watt metal halide fixtures with a light output of about 87 lumens per watt. The

hang light is located 8 feet from the dome surface and emits the light at a 60 degree angle thereby covering an area

of 63.2 square meters. With the fixture lighting efficiency of 74.3%, the light output shining on the inside of the

dome is 1026 lumens per square meter (lux). The exterior fabric is 12% translucent, and so the light intensity on theoutside surface is 12% of 1026 lux, or 123 lux.

The light fixture data sheet is attached for reference showing the light output and fixture efficiency. In order to

understand what these light levels mean, the table below describes light intensity of various common conditions.

Illuminance Surfaces illuminated by:10

4 lux Moonless, overcast night sky (starlight)

0.002 lux Moonless clear night sky with airglow

0.271.0 lux Full moon on a clear night

3.4 lux Dark limit of civil twilight under a clear sky

50 lux Family living room lights

80 lux Office building hallway/toilet lighting

100 lux Very dark overcast day

320500 lux Office lighting

400 lux Sunrise or sunset on a clear day.

1,000 lux Overcast day; typical TV studio lighting

10,00025,000 lux Full daylight (not direct sun)

32,000130,000 lux Direct sunlight

The light emitted from our translucent air supported structure at night with the 1000 watt metal halide fixture

arranged for indirect internal lighting has the appearance of a mild glow in the direct area of the light fixtures.

Between the areas where the light fixture shines directly on the dome the light transmission is much lower as the

diffuse light levels inside the building are approximately 500 lux, the outside light intensity would be 500 lux x 12%or 60 lux.


33/77



Arizon has produced many of our structures with opaque sides and translucent materials only at the top of the dometo create a skylight. Although this does reduce the amount of natural lighting inside the structure during the day,

it blocks the light emitted from the dome in the opaque areas completely. The skylight area where the inside light

may be visible from the outside is almost not seen at all from ground level. The diagram below shows how little of

the skylight area is visible from the ground 1000 feet away from the dome.

At 34 from the dome the skylight is not visible at all. At 500 away only about 4 of the skylight area is visible. In

addition, the light illuminance from the dome decreases with distance from the dome.

Therefore, the light from the translucent portions of the dome (or the entire dome is the whole building is made withtranslucent material) will certainly be visible, but is not a problem of light intensity or brightness so much as the

look of the building at night. Basically it comes down to personal preference rather than brightness that will either

please or displease the observer.

Below is a photo of a fully translucent dome using 1000 watt metal halide lights in a line around the inside of the

dome. The view from the outside at dusk shows how the light is greater at the spot of the light fixture and the light

above or below the light fixture. If this building were opaque with a skylight, the skylight area would not be visible

from this angle.


34/77



Here is another picture from the inside of an air structure with a skylight. The dome is opaque around the sides of

the structure and 12% translucent at the top. The light through the skylight area of this building is no greater thanlight sources from the surrounding buildings.

To summarize, the issue of light transmission through the dome is often much more an issue of style more than light

intensity, of how the building looks rather than how bright the light source. If the discussion is truly one of

brightness through the dome, the above light transmission estimates can be used for comparison to background light

levels in the area.

I hope this letter provides enough of our experience on the subject to answer your concerns.

Sincerely,

Thomas J. Soehngen

VP - EngineeringArizon Structures


35/77


Item Title: LWRP update status - Les Steinman

Item Summary: LWRP update status - Les Steinman

Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:

No Attachments Available


36/77


Item Title: Discussion with Daniel Margoshes, Chair of the Budget Committee regarding what role theBoard would like the Committee to play in the upcoming Budget process.

ItemSummary:

Discussion with Daniel Margoshes, Chair of the Budget Committee regarding what role theBoard would like the Committee to play in the upcoming Budget process.

FiscalImpact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:

52990.pdf 5/29/90


37/77


38/77


39/77


Item Title: Draft proposed changes to the Sidewalk Cafe law; covering time frame, and the allowancefor outside music.

ItemSummary:

Draft proposed changes to the Sidewalk Cafe law; covering time frame, and the allowancefor outside music.

Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:

SC.pdf Draft


40/77


41/77


42/77


43/77


44/77


45/77


46/77


Item Title: Discussion of adoption of property values subsequent to Town of Mamaroneck Reval; wouldalso have to adopt Town of Rye values too.

ItemSummary:

Discussion of adoption of property values subsequent to Town of Mamaroneck Reval; wouldalso have to adopt Town of Rye values too.

FiscalImpact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:



47/77


Item Title: Bond Resolution for replacement of sewer main on Jefferson Avenue as part of the JeffersonAvenue Bridge project.

ItemSummary:

Bond Resolution for replacement of sewer main on Jefferson Avenue as part of the JeffersonAvenue Bridge project.

Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:



48/77


Item Title: Scheduling Alarm Code appeal hearing for April 15, 2013 Work Session

Item Summary: Scheduling Alarm Code appeal hearing for April 15, 2013 Work Session

Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:

Tom_Ardis_Correspondence.pdf Tom Ardis

Response.pdf response


49/77


50/77


51/77


52/77


53/77


54/77


55/77


56/77


57/77


58/77


59/77


60/77


61/77


62/77


63/77


64/77


65/77


66/77


67/77


Item Title: Authorization for progress payment on Jefferson Avenue Bridge project

Item Summary: Authorization for progress payment on Jefferson Avenue Bridge project

Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:



68/77


Item Title: Bid Results Contract 2013-06 - New HVAC Installation at 169 Mt. Pleasant Avenue

Item Summary: Bid Results Contract 2013-06 - New HVAC Installation at 169 Mt. Pleasant Avenue

Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:

Bid_13_06.pdf 13-06 results


69/77


70/77


Item Title: Bid Results Contract 2013-07 - Pavilion Roof Replacement Project

Item Summary: Bid Results Contract 2013-07 - Pavilion Roof Replacement Project

Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:

Bid_13_07.pdf bid results


71/77


72/77


Item Title: Budget Amendment to appropriate money for 234 Stanlely Avenue oil tank andremediation

ItemSummary:

Budget Amendment to appropriate money for 234 Stanley Avenue oil tank andremediation

Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:

234.pdf 234


73/77


74/77


Item Title: Disposal of surplus vehicles by auction

Item Summary: Disposal of surplus vehicles by auction

Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:

VV.pdf PV


75/77


76/77


Item Title: Budget Amendment for FEMA and OEM monies for Hurricane Sandy (revenues).

Item Summary: Budget Amendment for FEMA and OEM monies for Hurricane Sandy (revenues).

Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

Name: Description:

Resolution.pdf Resolution


77/77

Contract between USDA Wildlife Services and Mamaroneck NY May-Sept 2013

Documents

Transcript of Contract between USDA Wildlife Services and Mamaroneck NY May-Sept 2013