Conference summary
description
Transcript of Conference summary
![Page 1: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Conference summary
Catherine CesarskyESO
Moriond, March 2005
![Page 2: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
When UV meets infrared
• (and everything from gamma rays to radio)
• Do we see the same sources in UV and IR?
![Page 3: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
GALEX 24 micron MIPS
IRAC GOODS
![Page 4: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Summary
1. By selection, UV galaxies and IR galaxies have very different characteristic IR/UV ratios (the means differ by a factor of 10). 2. The morphological and stellar mass distributions of the two populations have good overlaps (> 70%). IR galaxies tend to be more massive and earlier types, with an excess of interacting galaxies, and UV galaxies to be less massive and later types.3. UV galaxies are less clustered than IR galaxies.
4. Galaxies with the highest SFR (>100 M /yr, Ltot > 1012 L ),
are missed in the UV samples.5. A population of low metallicity (< 1/10 solar), low mass (<10^9 M ) dwarf UV galaxies (prototype I Zw 18) are `IR quiet’, with the IR/UV ratio ~ 0.3 or less. They occupy only a few percent of a UV selected sample.
๏
๏ ๏
![Page 5: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Moriond 2005VC
UV/mid-IR comparison of two LIRGsUV/mid-IR comparison of two LIRGs
Charmandaris, Le Floc’h, Mirabel, ApJ, 2004, 600, L15
At z~2: UV --> R-/I- band & ISO/CAM 7μm -> Spitzer/MIPS24.
The poor spatial at z~2 will result in blending of the emission from the unresolved interacting components. An increased scatter will thus be introduced in the observed optical to mid-IR colors of these galaxies, leading to a
systematic underestimation of their dust content.
7μm/UV ~ 800:10:35 7μm/UV ~ 330:160:190
Images: HST/STIS UV - Contours: ISOCAM 7μm
![Page 6: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Do we need UV to understand star formation?
• YES, at least in some cases (low obscuration)
![Page 7: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Rest UV Traces Star Formation
Over Large Range of Specific Star Formation & SFR/Area
What gives???
gas ranges 20:1
gas 1.4 ranges 70:1
Milky Way
Luminous UV Galaxies
Low SurfaceBrightnessGalaxies
Early Type Gals
( )* *
** / age
M Mb
M tM= =
& &
&
![Page 8: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Shortcut to SFH
• b-parameter vs. NUV-r color
– Obtain b from color alone– Works when no spectra are
available– Valuable for high z– Spread in x-direction due to
internal extinction
( )* *
** / age
M Mb
M tM= =
& &
&
NUV-r b
Rest UV Traces Star Formation
Over Large Range of Specific Star Formation
![Page 9: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
H and UV radial profiles Thilker, Meuer, et al
• Radial profile differences seen in other galaxies
• Not all galaxies show H deficit
UV
Ha
![Page 10: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
•Star clusters as indicators/ demonstrators of star formation
![Page 11: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• Do we need IR to understand star formation?
• YES, especially for the brightest galaxies
![Page 12: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Can the different star formation indicators be reconciled?
• Sometimes…
![Page 13: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Ha/UV in SDSSTreyer, Johnson, et al.
• Ha/UV shows systematic trend
Higher LUV, Blue NUV-r
L(Ha)/L(UV)~Kennicutt
Low LUV, Red NUV-r
L(Ha)/L(UV) > Kennicutt
![Page 14: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
OII line & UV luminosities underestimate SFR values by factors 5 to 100 for starbursts & LIRGs !
SFRs as estimated by UV, [OII] & IR(Hammer et al, Venice 2003, proceedings, astro-
ph/0401246)
![Page 15: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
SFRSFRNUVNUV vs. SFR vs. SFR
dustdust
Quite good agreement on average but...Quite good agreement on average but...lo
g S
FRdust (
Msu
n y
r-1)
log SFRNUV (Msun yr-1)
![Page 16: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
● At low values of At low values of AANUVNUV, the dust , the dust
emission emission underestimates the underestimates the total SFR because of total SFR because of the non negligible the non negligible NUV emission.NUV emission.● At high values of At high values of AANUVNUV, the NUV , the NUV
emission emission underestimates the underestimates the total SFR. total SFR. Problem with AProblem with ANUVNUV??
Two different trends are observed:Two different trends are observed:
log SFRNUV (Msun yr-1)
log S
FRN
UV/S
FRdust
![Page 17: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Estimating extinctions and SFRs at z ~1
(Flores et al, 2004, A&A 415, 885)FORS2/ISAAC: 16 ISO galaxies, 0.4< z <1
- extinction corrected H SFRs are close to mid-IR estimates (Elbaz et al, 2002) for SFR < 150 MO/yr (i.e. below ULIRGs)
more robust SFR estimates
-luminous IR galaxies (not ULIRGs) dominates the cosmic star formation density at z~1 (confirmed by Spitzer, Le Floch et al, 2004)
less than 20% of the star formation density is coming from extremely dust enshrouded regions
![Page 18: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
•Deep IR surveys: do we understand what we see?
•Probably, but…
![Page 19: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
EBL: optical vs IR
![Page 20: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
CIRB~ 1.5 OPT IGL
In local universe, about 30% bolometric light in IR; LIRGs, ULIRGs produce 2% of bolometric luminosity
However,distant universe is IR.
Due to LIRGs? How distant?
![Page 21: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
LW3z=0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Typical galaxyspectra
K-corrections
LW3 15
LW2 6.7
![Page 22: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
CIRB peak: 140 m
Individual galaxies peak: 60 to 100 m
Peak shifted to 140 m
if z=0.4 to 1.3 (<z>~0.85)
15 m 8 m
z=0.85 z=0
140 m 80 m
ISOCAM deep surveys in LW3 (12-18 m):
Ideal to detect redshifted PAH for z~0.85 (or in general at z<1.5)
![Page 23: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Number Counts• Roughly in agreement with
ISOCAM results • Some confused ISOCAM
sources are resolved by Spitzer• The HDF-N pilot study is not an
unbiased survey• Marleau et al. (2004) find 24
m number counts peak at fainter flux than 15 m counts
• difference b/w 15 and 24 m counts is not the result of confusion of ISOCAM sources or systematic differences between the observatories
![Page 24: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
From the MIR ? From the MIR ?
Local universe : correlation MIR – LIR Local universe : correlation MIR – LIR (Elbaz et al, 2002)
correlation radio-MIR correlation radio-MIR (Codon 1992, Yun et al, 2001)
or radio is a tracer of LIRor radio is a tracer of LIR
MIR + local templates or correlations => FIR=> LIR => SFRMIR + local templates or correlations => FIR=> LIR => SFR Chary & Elbaz 2001 Kennicutt 1998Chary & Elbaz 2001 Kennicutt 1998
Dale & Helou, 2002 Dale & Helou, 2002 Lagache et et al, 2004Lagache et et al, 2004
…… ……....
M82(disque)
(Laurent et al. 2000)
15 m vs IRIR vs IRAS 12 mIR vs ISOCAM 15 m
![Page 25: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
24m Spitzer-MIPS
15m ISOCAM
SED of a LIRG at z=0.69 (LIR~10SED of a LIRG at z=0.69 (LIR~1011.111.1 L L,SFR~22 M,SFR~22 Myr-1)yr-1)
The PAH bump exists at z=0.7The PAH bump exists at z=0.7
![Page 26: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
*
50 % stars born z<1.5 (70 % universe age)36 % @ z<1 (57 %)67 % @ z<2 (76 %)
Proportion of present-day stars born in LIRGs > 50 %==> Common phase experienced by all/most galaxies...
LIRGs and cosmic star formation
![Page 27: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
General 24m differential counts (this work, Chary et al. 2004, Papovich et al. 2004)
![Page 28: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Model predictions Model predictions SS2424/S/S1515 as a function of z, Sas a function of z, S2424Model predictions Model predictions SS2424/S/S1515 as a function of z, Sas a function of z, S2424
S > 2-3 mJyS > 2-3 mJy dominated by dominated by objects with Sobjects with S2424/S/S15152-2.52-2.5
S S 0.3 mJy 0.3 mJy dominated by dominated by objects with Sobjects with S2424/S/S15 15 1.51.5
S < 0.2-0.3 mJyS < 0.2-0.3 mJy dominated dominated by objects with Sby objects with S2424/S/S15 15 > 2-3 > 2-3 -> NEW POPULATION !-> NEW POPULATION !
S > 2-3 mJyS > 2-3 mJy dominated by dominated by objects with Sobjects with S2424/S/S15152-2.52-2.5
S S 0.3 mJy 0.3 mJy dominated by dominated by objects with Sobjects with S2424/S/S15 15 1.51.5
S < 0.2-0.3 mJyS < 0.2-0.3 mJy dominated dominated by objects with Sby objects with S2424/S/S15 15 > 2-3 > 2-3 -> NEW POPULATION !-> NEW POPULATION !
![Page 29: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
R-band mag versus Flux@24μm
Rencontres de Moriond, March 6-12th 2005
80% completeness limit at 24μm
VERY hard to be complete in the redshift identification at any 24μm flux, using VVDS/GOODS/COMBO-17
![Page 30: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
IR luminosities in the CDFS
2635 sourceswith redshifts
* Modest IR emitters at 0<z<0.5
* ULIRGs : quite rare at 0<z<1
* LIRGS: significant contribution at z>0.5
* More « normal » starbursts are not negligible neither
80% completeness limit
Rencontres de Moriond, March 6-12th 2005
![Page 31: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Star formation history at z<1
LIRGs/ULIRGs dominate beyond z~0.7
Chary & Elbaz 2001
Blain et al. 2002
Lagache et al. 2004
. . . . . .
_ _ _ _ _
ULIRGs
total
L >10 L .11
IR
L <10 L .11
IR
Rencontres de Moriond, March 6-12th 2005
Compilation by Hopkins 2004
![Page 32: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
![Page 37: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Moriond 2005VC
![Page 39: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
![Page 40: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
![Page 41: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
![Page 43: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
![Page 46: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
![Page 47: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
![Page 48: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
![Page 49: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
![Page 50: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
![Page 51: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
![Page 52: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
![Page 53: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
![Page 54: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
![Page 55: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
![Page 56: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
V. Lebouteiller – Moriond 2005
![Page 57: Conference summary](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813b64550346895da4647c/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)