Compliance with the Clean Air Act: Remove, Retrofit or Replace
-
Upload
trc-companies-inc -
Category
Documents
-
view
897 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Compliance with the Clean Air Act: Remove, Retrofit or Replace
November 15, 2012
Compliance with the Clean Air Act: Remove Retrofit or Replace?
RE POWER Initiative
CONFIDENTIAL
RE POWER™ Summary
Fuel economics, generation technology, energy efficiency and more stringent regulations are changing the U.S. generating fleet.
Gas turbine plants are winning in the power supply auctions and gaining market share from coal and oil fired steam plants.
Re Power ™ - Retire, Retrofit or Replace Retirements are estimated at 60 GW of coal plant closures of
a total of 340 GW, or approximately 500 boiler/turbine units. Retrofits are estimated to be 103 GW of a total of 340 GW,
or about 200 fuel switch or scrubber projects on larger plants. Replacements with combined cycle gas turbine plants are estimated
at 35 GW, or 70 GTs at 500 MW per plant in PJM, MISO and SERC ISOs. Forecast capital spend is $70 – 100 billion.
2
Do We Need to Replace All Closed Plants?
3
Regional reserve margin estimates and targets for summer2012
What Does Reserve Capacity Look Like?
4
Current (2010) capacity by initial year of operation and fuel type
What Coal Plants are Retiring?
CONFIDENTIAL 5
Announced coal plant capacity retirements 2011-2020
As of June 10, 2011 Source: SNL Energy Map credit: J. Bellavance, C. Kerr
Where are the Retrofit Projects?
CONFIDENTIAL
Each of these red dots will likely turn green or go away.
6
SO2 emissions by coal plant, 2010Short tons
What about New Build?
Forecast new build is 35 GWs of combined cycle gas turbine from 2015 - 2020. PJM 9 GW MISO 8W SERC 20 GW
Timing is from 2015 – 2020.
CALISO, ERCOT and NYISO will likely need new build, subject to permitting and rate issues.
7
Fuel Diversity
8
Exhibit 2: Natural Gas Futures vs. MMBtu Equivalent CAPP Coal Futures Prices
U.S. Electricity Net Generation by Fuel, 1990-2035
Trillion kilowatt hours per year
Economic Market Drivers
Reduce Variable Costs Natural gas ($2.50 - $4 per MMBTU is competitive with coal
($3.00 per MMBTU). Combined cycle gas turbine technology heat rate is 30%
more efficient than steam boiler technology.
Reduce Fixed Costs Real estate taxes, labor, maintenance
Minimize Capital Expenditures CCGT new build cost of $750 - $1000 per KW is comparable
to retrofit cost of $450 – 750 per KW. Third party capital for merchant power plants Balance sheet financing for retrofit control technology
CONFIDENTIAL 9
10
Incremental Capital and Operating Expenditures for Scrubbing Old Plants vs. New Gas Turbines
Investment Incremental CapitalIncremental
Operating Cost
Flue Gas Desulfurization $300 – 500 per KW $0.43 / MWHr
Selective Catalytic Reduction
$150 – 300 per KW $0.47 / MWHr
Activated Carbon $5 – 10 per KW $0.30 / MWHr
Incremental Labor 0 $2,000,000 / year
Total Retrofit $450 – 800 per KW $3.40 / MWHr
New Build Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
$750 – 1000 per KW 0.47 / MWHr for SCR
RE POWER Regulatory Drivers
Utility MACT Compliance Final 1 Hour NAAQS Rule for SO2 and NOx Mercury and Toxic Substances Rule (“MATS”) Issued November
2011 – Three Year Compliance Period Best Technology available for cooling water intake structures§316(B) Coal Combustion Residue Management (rules pending).
11
Making the Right Decision - Playbooks
Business Objective for Deregulated Generators Maximizing shareholder return Positive cash flow and IRR > cost of capital
Economic Growth Revenue potential in particular market Competitive cost profile
Environmental Excellence Compliance with current rules Compliance with pending or likely rules
Corporate Responsibility Generating reliable power at competitive rates
12
Retirements – Sell It or Demolish?
Engineering During Decommissioning Pre-demolition surveys for asbestos, hazardous materials,
structures, utility relocations, asset and real estate valuation, permitting and future use
Contract plans and specifications
Abatement, Decommissioning and Demolition Pre-qualified bidders, procurement and construction support
Remediation and Restoration to Suit Future Use
As-is, where is sales May involve substantial cash plus the plant Watch out for the boomerang!
13
14
Retrofits
Fuel Switching Coal to low-sulfur coal and coal to gas
switching are popular options. May address SOx, but not NOx Cooling Water 316(b) issue remains
Tweaking Existing Scrubbers May address MATS but not SOx and NOx
Scrubbing Old Coal Plants Hard to justify investing up to $700/KW in
50 year old coal fired steam turbine plants with high heat rates
2,651 MW of clean coal plants were recently sold for $400,000,000 or $151/KW.
15
Replacements
Current EIA reserves indicate that closed plants do not need to ve replaced in kind. Load pockets, CALISO, ERCOT and NYISO may be exceptions.
New CCGTs are competitive in power auctions and capture base load market.
Gas turbines with SCRs for NOx removal
Air cooled condensers to avoid cooling water regulations
Merchant power or PPAs
Waterside Station
16
17
Hunter’s Point, San Francisco
18
Austin Energy Holly Street
Glenwood Landing and Rockaway NY
19
Astoria Energy Center, New York City
Permitting of the old NYPA Poletti and the new NYPA 500 MW Plants
NYPA Poletti – Engineering During Decommissioning
Astoria Energy I & II Siting, Licensing and Permitting
Astoria Energy II (Suez and SNC Lavalin) Environmental Oversight
20
Questions?Ed MalleyP: 646.522.6488 | E: [email protected]