Competitor Analysis · 2018-10-10 · Competitor F Competitor H Competitor V Kaydon 94.9 97.6 97.8...
Transcript of Competitor Analysis · 2018-10-10 · Competitor F Competitor H Competitor V Kaydon 94.9 97.6 97.8...
Kaydon Custom Filtration Corporation DS-1006-TE
Competitor Performance ResultsBeta Results at 4 micron
Competitor Analysis
Kaydon Custom Filtration regularly tests competitor elements against its own. Recent testing of the Kaydon Turbo-TOC® elements against four principal competitors for particulate elements, coalescers and separators revealed the performance advantage of using and main-taining Kaydon element technology in the Turbo-TOC® systems, or changing from these competitors to Kaydon. The tests, conducted internally to Kaydon using its own laboratory, represent a valid comparison of where we stand against those who have attempted to copy Kaydon’s Turbo-TOC® elements. Ultimately, they reveal the best protection for your turbine bearings is with the new “advanced” KL series of Turbo-TOC® elements; they can save you money on turbine oil and bearing maintenance and better protect against a possible leaking seal.
* Testing per ISO 16889, Best rated micro slots elements.
Turbo-TOC® Elements
Kaydon
Bowser
Competitor V
Competitor F
Competitor H
Competitor R
K1100 K2100 K3100 Prefi lter Coalescer* Separator*patent pending
Water Removal Effi ciency Total Water Capabiility
Competitor F
Competitor H
Competitor V
Kaydon
94.9
97.6
97.8
98.3 Kaydon Competitor V Competitor H Bowser Competitor F Competitor R
400
300
200
100
0
* Average single pass effi ciency over course of water removal testing, based on Karl Fischer.
* Analysis of inlet and outlet samples. Information on Competitor R and Bowser Systems is available by request.
* Total water content by Karl Fischer analysis during Kaydon testing as defi ned: based upon a constant initial water ingression of 5000 ppm; test run at 120°F (49°C), 6 gpm.
2500
50
400
225
450
6
1571 Lukken Industrial Drive West • LaGrange, Georgia USA 30240Phone: 1 (800) 241-2342 • 1 (706) 884-3041 • Fax: (706) 883-6199Web: www.kaydonfi ltration.com • Email: fi [email protected]©2006, Kaydon Corporation
Kaydon Custom
Filtration Corporation
DS-1006-TE
E X T E N D I N G Y O U R E N E R G Y
Total Performance Average Annual Savings Improvement Against Competitor
Kaydon Bowser Competitor V Competitor F Competitor H Competitor R
Competitor R
Competitor H
Competitor F
Competitor V
Bowser
1
2.2
1.31
2.77
1.43
5.08 $118, 000
$101,000
$145,000
$45,000
$34,000
.65.80
.94
2.08
2.763.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
Years
Competitors
$7,000
$29,000
$140,000
$174,000
Kaydon Bowser Competitor R Competitor F Competitor H Competitor V
Competitor V Competitor H Competitor F Competitor R
Kaydon Bowser Competitor R Competitor F Competitor H Competitor V
* This factor takes into account total water content of outlet sample, effi ciency of water removal as defi ned above, and best-available particulate fi lter effi ciency for the system. For more information, contact Kaydon product management. A value of 1.0 signifi es equivalence; a value greater than 1.0 gives you an idea of how much better Kaydon Turbo-TOC® elements are, or how much worse is the competitor.
* Based on recommended, regular scheduled maintenance of systems in question and estimated dollar savings for both turbine oil and bearing life. Note: as an insurance policy, protection and potential savings may be even greater.
Payback Competitor's Additional Annual Comparison Projected Maintenance Costs
* This payback is calculated using the more conservative factors of bearing and turbine oil life improvements with a Kaydon Turbo-TOC® system – savings potential. Payback to replace competitior with Kaydon System and Elements.
* Rather than showing savings with Kaydon elements, these values refl ect the additional, potential costs of replacing Turbo-TOC® elements with competitors.
ISO 9001:2000
Certificate No.: 002232