Competency of Witnesses
-
Upload
rachit-goel -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Competency of Witnesses
-
8/2/2019 Competency of Witnesses
1/4
Competency of witnesses (S.118-120)
No witness can be allowed to give evidence in the court if he is not competent to be a witness.Compellability even where a witness is competent, he may not be compellable. The term
'compellability' has to be understood in two ways -
1) Compelling to sworn in or affirm as witness i.e. to make him appear before the Court.2) Compelling to answer questions after he has been sworn
Compellability to appear - A person, though competent to be a witness, may not be compelled
to to appear as a witness -
a. If he is not within thejurisdiction of the courtb. Because of his special statusc. Because of the immunity granted by the legislature.
Compellability to answereven a person is competent and compellable to appear before the
court, he may not be compelled to answer certain questions under the provisions of this Act. (S.
121 - 132)
S. 118 120 define competency of witnessS. 118 general rule as to the competency of witness the only test of competency is that the
witness should not be prevented from understanding the questions put to him or giving rational
answers to those questions because of tender years, lunacy, disease and old age etc. Involves the
intellectual capacity to function as a witness
Competency of an accused to be a witness Amendment of CrPC in 1955 inserted S. 342A
Competency of a child witness A child is not disqualified as a witness solely by reason of his youth
No precise age laid down to determine competency
Depends upon the capacity and intelligence of the child
A child of 6/7 years is a competent witness if it appears from his disposition that he can understand the
questions put to him and give rational answers
State v. Allen
The court concluded that the true test of the competency of a young child of tender years consists
of
(1) An understanding of the obligation to tell the truth,
-
8/2/2019 Competency of Witnesses
2/4
(2) The mental capacity at the time of the occurrence concerning the testimony,
(3) sufficient memory to retain an independent recollection of the occurrence,
(4) the capacity to express in words her memory of the occurrence, and
(5) the capacity to understand simple questions about the occurrence.
Credibility of child witnessReliance on a child witness may turn out to be dangerous. But there is no strict rule of law that
conviction can never be based on child evidence
Communications (privileged, official, professional) (S.121-132)
Matters where a witness cannot be compelled to disclose but he can, if he wishes to do so. (S.121, 122, 124, 125, 129, 130-132)
Judges and Magistrates (S. 121)A judge or magistrate cannot be compelled to any question as to
His conduct in the court in the capacity of judge or magistrate. Any matter which comes to his
knowledge as judge or magistrate
Reasons The rule is based on public policy
if the judge assumes the place of a witness he would be put into a partisan attitude and
would lose the essential quality of being impartial.His continuing power as judge would embarrass the opposing counsel in his cross-
examination and would restrict the opponent's opportunity to expose the truth.
No privilege when matters come to his knowledge not as a judge or magistrate.If the judge or magistrates do not object to questions, questions cannot be disallowed
Disclosure of marital communications (S. 122)'Compelled to disclose' & 'permitted to disclose'
Object to protect family peace and mutual confidence between the married couple
Privilege applies to communications, not to acts or conduct.
Communications must have been made during the continuation of the marriage. It remains protected
even after divorce. Divorce does not terminate the privilege for confidential marital communications.
Death of a spouse does not make the communications admissible.
Exceptions under which marital communications may be permitted to disclose:If the party against whom evidence is given gives consent for disclosure.
-
8/2/2019 Competency of Witnesses
3/4
If one spouse is prosecuted for crime against the other
Affairs of state (S. 123)The document must relate to affairs of the state.
The document is an unpublished work
the disclosure would result in injury to public interest.
Exception permission of the officer at the head of the department concerned (his discretion) Case law State of Punjab v. Sodhi Sukhdeo Singh (state claimed privilege under S. 123) Official Communications (S. 124)
A public officer cannot be compelled to disclose communications which are made to him in official
confidence if the disclosure would injure public interest.
Voluntary disclosure by the public officer is not prohibited by the section.
Information as to commission of offenses (S. 125)Magistrates or police officer shall not be compelled to disclose the source of information as to the
commission of any offense. This privilege may be waived. If the witness himself is willing to answer, the
section does not prohibit him from answering
Professional Communications (S. 126)S.126-129 deal with the communications between a client and his professional legal adviser.
All communications between professional advisers like barrister, attorney, pleader or vakil and their
clients are strictly confidential and they cannot be disclosed by the adviser except with the consent of
the client.
The adviser is also prohibited from disclosing contents of any document with which he has become
acquainted during the course of his professional employment, and any advice given by him to the client.
Professional Communications (S. 126) Reasons
Confidence
Impossible to conduct legal proceeding without professional assistance
Necessity to secure the fullest and most unreserved communications between the legal adviser and the
client to render the assistance effective.
Designed to protect the interest of the client, hence privilege conferred by this section may be waived
by the client himself either expressly under S. 126 or under second part of S. 128
-
8/2/2019 Competency of Witnesses
4/4
Waiving of privilege (S. 128) When the client calls legal adviser as a witness and puts to him questions on matters
which he would not be at liberty to disclose, he would be deemed to have waived the
privilege to that extent.
Confidential communications with legal advisers (S. 129)No one shall be compelled to disclose to the court any confidential communication which has taken
place between him and his legal adviser, unless he offers himself as a witness, that too only those
communications which may appear to the court necessary to be known
Production of title deeds of witness not a party (S. 130) No witness shall be compelled to produce his title deeds to any property.
Witness not to be excused from answering on the ground of incrimination (S. 132) All persons should be encouraged to come forward with evidence. Hence they should be
protected from unnecessary annoyance and inconvenience.
The section denies this protection, but the proviso ensures that the evidence obtained by compelling
him to answer incriminating questions shall not be used against him in any criminal proceeding, except
for prosecuting him for giving false evidence