The Helen Coburn Meier and Tim Meier Charitable Foundation for the Arts.
Comments on: Angrisani, Kapteyn, and Meier “Non-Monetary Job Characteristics and Employment...
Transcript of Comments on: Angrisani, Kapteyn, and Meier “Non-Monetary Job Characteristics and Employment...
Comments on:Angrisani, Kapteyn, and Meier
“Non-Monetary Job Characteristics and Employment Transitions at
Older Ages”
SSA Retirement Research ConsortiumAnnual Meeting, August 7, 2015
David Weir
University of Michigan
What data?
• HRS– Self-reported work status– Self-reported job characteristics– Many other covariates
• Matched at detailed occupation level to O*Net– A compilation of information on “average” job
characteristics in the occupation
Transition from FT Employment
• Policy goal is (or should be) to encourage people to stay in FT employment a little longer
• I will focus on just that outcome of transitions, not the details of where people go when they leave FT employment
How does their model do on other things we know about?
55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70-0.3
-0.25
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
ModelActual
Age
Prob
of s
tayi
ng in
FT
wor
k, re
lativ
e to
age
55
Job characteristics
• Physical abilities decline with age, so more physically demanding jobs are likely to be associated with earlier retirement
• Cognitive abilities decline with age, and technological change (computers) increase demands over time
• Job stress should lead to earlier departure
Estimated Effects of Job Characteristics on Remaining in Full-Time Work
Computer Physical demands
Stress-0.02
-0.015
-0.01
-0.005
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
HRSO*netHRS | O*netO*net | HRS
Self-report vs “objective”
• Self-report much better than objective on stress– Makes sense that an individual job situation and an
individual’s subjective evaluation are more relevant than some average over many similar jobs
• Physical demands encourage departure– Self-report and objective are similar but objective “beats”
subjective head to head• Not much different on computer use
– Positive effect of computers is perhaps surprising– Without controlling for physical demands, it may just be that
using computers is a proxy for not being physically demanding
What about retirement intentions
• HRS asks about planned retirement age, probabilities of working FT at 62 and 65
• These predict behavior reasonably well and respond to things
Average expected probability of working full-time past age 62, and age 65, for currently employed persons
aged 55-60, 1992-2014
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 20140
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Age 62Age 65
Impact of job characteristics not as clear or consistent
• Computer use raises SP of future work, self-report beats O*net in a close decision
• Physical demands lowers SP only from O*net• Stress lowers SP only from HRS self-report
Next steps
• Estimate effects of job characteristics jointly to isolate unique effects of each
• Think about interactions– Does having a physically demanding job interact
with physical limitations (walking, stooping, lifting, etc)?
– Does having a cognitively demanding job interact with cognitive ability or decline?
– Does job stress interact with depression?
Implications for encouraging longer work lives
• Policy implications not so clear– Not going to subsidize SS benefits or tax rates
according to job characteristics– Not going to regulate employers to make jobs less
physically demanding or give everyone computers– Might want to enforce or expand rules on
accommodation of age-related disability in the workplace, IF there is an interaction between characteristics and physical limitations
Implications for encouraging longer work lives
• Might be some room for advising people how to avoid “premature” retirement
• Recognize mismatch of your aging trajectory and your current job’s demands
• Think about changing jobs earlier to one that will let you work longer (less physically demanding)
• Find ways to manage stress• And let me know when you find it…