Columbus City Schools - DeJONG-RICHTER · 2016. 4. 18. · Note: Ecole Kenwood, Spanish Immersion,...

Columbus City Schools

FACILITIES MASTER PLANNING PROCESS

COMMUNITY DIALOGUES

APRIL 18-21. 2016

2

Ad-Hoc Committee Co-Chairs W. Shawna Gibbs – Board Member Dominic Paretti – Board Member

District-wide Data Presentation Tracy Richter, DeJONG-RICHTER

INTRODUCTIONS AND PROCESS

3

This is the beginning of the conversation: The approved plan will take at least 10-15 years to complete. The plan will be completed in phases. Each phase may be adjusted in the future due to demographic or

programmatic shifts. No changes proposed in this plan will be implemented in the 2016-17

school year.

THE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN

4

Place every student in a new or fully renovated facility. Position the District to operate facilities efficiently to put valuable tax-

payer dollars into the classroom. Balance diverse educational programs, neighborhood schools, and

long term operational costs.

GOALS OF THIS FACILITIES MASTER PLAN

5

Options DevelopmentDevelopment of Facility Options that Consider:

Application of Data Demographic Programmatic Condition - Physical & Adequacy Financial

Application of Educational Framework Equitable Application Action Types & Prioritization by Need

Renovations Boundary Consolidations New Schools Replacements Programmatic - Choice, Grade Configurations, etc… Alternative Uses

Enrollment(Live-In & Attend)

Condition

Programs

CapacityOSFC/CCS Programs

Planning Rules

(OSFC)(2/3rd Rule,

350 rule)

Community Surveys

FACILITY PLANNING PROCESS

6

CAPACITY• OSFC/OFCC - SQUARE FOOTAGE CAPACITY• CCS STUDENT CAPACITY

FCI - FACILITY CONDITION INDEX• RENOVATION vs REPLACMENT• 2/3RDS RULE

LIVE-IN ENROLLMENT vs. PROJECTED ENROLLMENT

SURVEY RESULTS• BY ZIP CODE

DATA TERMS

FACILITY PORTFOLIO: Remaining vs. Completed

7

# Completed

Median Capacity

Overall Utilization

# RemainingMedian

CapacityOverall

UtilizationAverage Condition

Elementary Schools 35 405 95% 34 314 114% 84%

Middle Schools 3 525 91% 13 533 88% 82%

High Schools 6 979 67% 14 932 86% 72%Note: Ecole Kenwood, Spanish Immersion, and Africentric are all considered completed facilit ies and will open in the Fall of 2016

Completed Remaining

FACILITY PORTFOLIO: Remaining vs. Completed

8

New ES Seats already built 15,952Max ES Enrollment in 5 Year Projection 27,253

Remaining Co-Funded Replacement Seats 11,301

ES Students Currently Enrolled in Old Buildings 13,474Deficit of Co-Funded Replacement Seats 2,173

Buildings are Co-Funded at 120 SQFT / Student 1,249,560Old ES Square Footage 1,382,371Square Footage that will not be eligible for Co-Funding 132,811

Seat Analysis

Square Footage Analysis

Note: Co-funding seat analyses are estimates and will finalized during the recommendations process.

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – OSFC CO-FUNDING SEAT ANALYSIS

New MS Seats already built 2,769Max MS Enrollment in 5 Year Projection 10,577


MS Students Currently Enrolled in Old Buildings 6,902Deficit of Co-Funded Replacement Seats 906

Buildings are Co-Funded at 145 SQFT / Student 1,132,160Old MS Square Footage 1,341,605Square Footage that will not be eligible for Co-Funding 209,445

Seat Analysis



MIDDLE SCHOOL – OSFC CO-FUNDING SEAT ANALYSIS

New HS Seats already built (excludes Fort Hayes Career Center) 4,888Max HS Enrollment in 5 Year Projection 12,503


HS Students Currently Enrolled in Old Buildings 9,809Deficit of Co-Funded Replacement Seats 2,194

Buildings are Co-Funded at 160 SQFT / Student 1,218,400Old HS Square Footage 1,907,896Square Footage that will not be eligible for Co-Funding 689,496

Seat Analysis



HIGH SCHOOL – OSFC CO-FUNDING SEAT ANALYSIS

12

Developed by “Planning Areas” & District Wide Programs Elementary & Middle Schools

• Options for PK-5, 6-8 Grade Configurations Only• Options for Blended PK-8, PK-5, 6-8 Grade Configurations• Options include Replacements, Renovations, and Consolidations

High Schools• Every Planning Area has an Option to keep all High Schools• Every Planning Area has an Option to Reduce High School Space• Options for all High Schools to be 9-12 Grade Configurations• Options that keep Existing Grade Configurations

OPTIONS - CONSIDERATIONS

13

Breakout for Options Presentation Northwest Area – Cafeteria Northeast Area – Gymnasium

Presentation of Area Specific Data and Options (20 minutes) Individual Questionnaire

Small Group Table Discussion Group Questionnaire

Adjourn All materials will be available online at http://www.dejongrichter.com/ccsoh/ Online questionnaire will be available for one week.

EVENING PROCESS

http://www.dejongrichter.com/ccsoh/

Northeast Planning Area

14

15

INFORMATION PACKETS

16

INFORMATION PACKETS

Grade Level2015/16 Official

Enrollment

Overall Capacity

OSFC

Overall % Utilizationby Enrollment

PK-5 5,584 4,232 132%

PK-6 1,936 1,788 108%

6-8 1,720 2,014 85%

7-12 768 1,000 77%

9-12 2,487 2,661 93%Note: OSFC- Ohio School Facilities Commission, Facility Assessment Capacity

17

INFORMATION PACKETS

Grade Level # of StudentsLive-In

# of Students Transfer out

# of StudentsTransfer into

PK-5 5,993 2,836 2,242

PK-6 2,627 1,117 426

6-8 2,134 967 438

7-12 1,588 1,022 138

9-12 3,296 1,942 956

NORTHEAST PLANNING AREA

Note: DOES NOT INCLUDE STUDENTS THAT LIVE OUTSIDE CCS BOUNDARIES AND ATTEND CCS SCHOOLS

18

INFORMATION PACKETS

Alpine ES 85%

Cassady Alt. ES 80%

Devonshire Alt. ES 90%

Forest Park ES 87%

Hamilton STEM ES 85%Maize ES 89%North Linden ES 89%North Towne ES 78%Valley Forge ES 90%Windsor STEM ES 83%Medina MS 73%Mifflin MS 91%Woodward Park MS 81%Beechcroft HS 74%Note: Higher % = Poorer Condition

School Facilities Renovation Costs Exceeds 2/3rd Cost of Replacement

(FCI)

Completed Facilities

East Linden ES

Huy/AG Bell ES

Linden STEM ES

South Mifflin STEM ES

Linden McKinley STEM 7-12

19

GRADE CONFIGURATION

COMMUNITY SURVEY RESPONSE

PK-5, 6-8, 9-12 PK-6, 7-12 PK-8, 9-12 PK-12 Campus

Strongly Support 247 32 69 72Support 117 82 97 55No Opinion 20 52 45 44Do Not Support 13 109 88 85Strongly Do Not Support 12 78 60 112

20

SCHOOL SIZE


Small Buildings

53

<-----> 55

<----->126

<----->70

<-----> 38

Larger Buildings 49

On the scale below, which do you prefer more: small buildings (smaller learning communities) or larger buildings (more program offerings)?

21

OVERCROWDING


Change the grade arrangement (move a grade out of a school - example change from a K - 5 to a K - 4 building) 144

Renovate and/or build a school 260Reassign some of the students to another school 104

Change attendance boundaries of nearby schools 175None of the above/No opinion 28

Which of the following do you recommend for schools that are overcrowded? Please check all that apply.

22

BACKGROUND DATA SHEETS

23

REMEMBER- WHAT YOU SEE SO FAR IS THE STARTING POINT OF THE DISCUSSIONNOTHING IS FINAL AND THESE ARE DRAFT ONLY

DO NOT HAVE TO SOLVE THE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN

SMALL GROUP TABLE DISCUSSIONS

24

COST ESTIMATES

Construction cost estimates are based on square foot cost figures provided by the OSFC in 2015 which have been adjusted to reflect 2016 dollars.

Building square footage is based on the 2015 OSFC design manual. Elementary costs DO NOT include LFI pre-kindergarten spaces. All middle school costs include a fixed seat auditorium built to seat the capacity of

the facility. All high school costs include a fixed seat auditorium built to seat the capacity of

the facility. Buildings with portions constructed before to 1940 have a 10% premium added to

the renovation costs to cover historical renovations and abatement. Costs DO NOT include any site acquisition costs. All costs are estimated projected totals before OSFC co-funding.

25

ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONS


26

ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 1 OptionOPTION 1aPK-5, 6-8 Grade Configuration

Elementary Schools to be Addressed in this Master Plan

Completed Elementary Schools

Completed Middle Schools

Middle Schools to be Addressed in this Master Plan

Building to be Retired

27

ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 1 OptionOPTION 1bPK-5, 6-8 Grade Configuration






28

ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 1 OptionOPTION 1cBlended PK-6, PK-5, 6-8 Grade Configuration






29






ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 2 OptionOPTION 1aPK-5, 6-8 Grade Configuration

30






ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 2 OptionOPTION 1bPK-5, 6-8 Grade Configuration

31

ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 2 OptionOPTION 2aPK-6, PK-5, 6-8 Grade Configuration Elementary Schools to be

Addressed in this Master Plan





32

ELEMENTARY & MIDDLE SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 2 OptionOPTION 2bPK-6, PK-5, 6-8 Grade Configuration Elementary Schools to be

Addressed in this Master Plan





33

HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONS


34

HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 1 OptionOPTION 1a, 1b, 1cReduce 1 High School

35

HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 1 OptionOPTION 2Keep Existing High Schools

Beechcroft High SchoolReplace @ 800

Mifflin High SchoolReplace @ 1000

Northland High SchoolReplace at 1000

Linden-McKinley 7-12No action- facility completed

36

HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 2 OptionOPTION 1Keep Existing Schools, 9-12 Grade Configuration

37

HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 2 OptionOPTION 2aReduce 1 High School, 9-12 Grade Configuration

38

HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 2 OptionOPTION 2bReduce 1 High School, 9-12 Grade Configuration

39

HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 2 OptionOPTION 3aLinden-McKinley, Convert to 9-12 Grade Configuration

40

HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT OPTIONSROUND 2 OptionOPTION 3bLinden-McKinley, Remain 7-12 Grade Configuration

41

THANK YOU

Columbus City Schools - DeJONG-RICHTER · 2016. 4. 18. · Note: Ecole Kenwood, Spanish Immersion,...

Documents

Transcript of Columbus City Schools - DeJONG-RICHTER · 2016. 4. 18. · Note: Ecole Kenwood, Spanish Immersion,...