Colonial discourse theories
-
Upload
jose-santiago-fernandez-vazquez -
Category
Technology
-
view
1.361 -
download
1
Transcript of Colonial discourse theories
![Page 1: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
COLONIAL DISCOURSE THEORIES
Postcolonial LiteraturesProf. José Santiago Fdez. Vázquez
![Page 2: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INTELLECTUAL HISTORY: FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE
Criticism of the traditional view of history:
Nietzsche criticizes linear progression and causality.
Emphasis on discontinuity epistemological break
![Page 3: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
INTELLECTUAL HISTORY: FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE
Interest in the concept of power:
Historical change determined by the “will to power”.
Truth depends on power.
![Page 4: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
INTELLECTUAL HISTORY: FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE
Nietzsche anticipates the critique of the subject:
Challenge to the idea of a homogeneous subject: conscious and unconscious.
There is no preexistent subjectivity. Subjectivity is constructed by supraindividual structures (language, ideology, discourse).
Double meaning of the term subject in postructuralist theory.
![Page 5: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
INTELLECTUAL HISTORY: LOUIS ALTHUSSER
Distinction between Repressive State Apparatuses and Ideological State Apparatuses.
Gramscian concepts of hegemony and domination by consent Internalization of dominant values Interpellation.
![Page 6: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
INTELLECTUAL HISTORY: JACQUES LACAN
Lacan distinguishes several stages in the construction of human subjectivity:
Imaginary phase: the “mirror stage”.
Initial state of confusion.
Identification with the “imago”: the fiction of a unified self.
Dialectic of recognition: ambivalence towards the “imago”
![Page 7: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
INTELLECTUAL HISTORY: JACQUES LACAN
Lacan distinguishes several stages in the construction of human subjectivity:
Symbolic phase:
Entry into the language system.
Assimilation of social values.
![Page 8: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
INTELLECTUAL HISTORY:MICHEL FOUCAULT
Rejection of conventionally accepted views and assumptions.
Discourse transports and produces Power.
![Page 9: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
KNOWLEDGE =POWER “We should admit … that power produces
knowledge (and not simply by encouraging it because it serves power or by applying it because it is useful); that power and knowledge directly imply one another; that there is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge; nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations”.
![Page 10: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
WHAT IS POWER? “Strategic” view of power: power is
present in all forms of social relation All of us are the recipients and the agents of power.
Foucault is interested in the microphysics of power: how power is exercised in ordinary relations, at all levels of society.
![Page 11: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
WHAT IS POWER? “Power works over free subjects”
The subject cooperates in his/her own subjection to the structures of power Internalization of dominant discourses Cf. Interpellation / Hegemony-Domination by consent.
Power is productive The subject is an effect of power.
![Page 12: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
THE PROBLEM OF AGENCY: IS IT POSSIBLE TO RESIST POWER?
There is no possibility to be outside power Even resistance takes place within the realm of power.
Two possible interpretations:
![Page 13: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
THE PROBLEM OF AGENCY: IS IT POSSIBLE TO RESIST POWER? There is no possibility to be outside power
Even resistance takes place within the realm of power.
Two possible interpretations:
Resistance is controlled by power Acts of resistance enable power to work more effectively.
![Page 14: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
THE PROBLEM OF AGENCY: IS IT POSSIBLE TO RESIST POWER? There is no possibility to be outside power
Even resistance takes place within the realm of power.
Two possible interpretations:
Resistance is controlled by power Acts of resistance enable power to work more effectively.
Power can be subverted from the inside.
![Page 15: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
SUBVERTING POWER FROM THE INSIDE“The answer was sure to go unchallenged. Of late,
the white people of Top Rock had been complaining that the police were letting too many people use the area as a thoroughfare, that too many houses in the area were being broken into, and that people were vandalizing the well-manicured lawns and stealing the mangoes off the trees in the back yards. So the police chief, who himself lived in Top Rock, and whose wife was a good friend of Pretty’s mistress, had put more policemen with bicycles on patrol in the area with orders to stop everyone” (No Man in the House)
![Page 16: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
DISCIPLINE AND PUNISH
Inquiry on the origin of prisons.
Rejection of the humanitarian argument See quotations.
Disciplinary power represents a shift from the control of the body to the control of the mind Cf. Interpellation / Hegemony-Domination by consent.
![Page 17: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
DISCIPLINE AND PUNISH
Surveillance as the major strategy of control in disciplinary societies.
The Panopticon as the epitome of surveillance Self-transformation.
![Page 18: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
THE PANOPTICON
![Page 19: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
THE PANOPTICON IN LITERATURE: AN EXAMPLE“Something was happening in his head, and he stared blankly waiting
for it to pass out. But suddenly the boy might look up, and catching the teacher’s eye would feel captured. He had done nothing wrong, and it was not his intention to do anything wrong. He had simply be seen by the teacher ... He did nothing wrong, but that didn’t matter. He was seen by the teacher. It didn’t happen between the boy and the teacher only, because it had nothing to do with authority. It also happened between teacher and teacher ... He had been seen by another. He had become a part of the other’s world, and therefore no longer in complete control of his own. The eye of another was a kind of cage. When it saw you the lid came down, and you were trapped. It was always happening. Sometimes when you stood alone in the public square where the buses parked, and the people went to and fro buying nuts, looking around, you got the feeling sometimes that they were looking at you, and if you were too sensitive you wanted to hide. Or in the cinema before the lights were dimmed ... It seemed the whole cinema like the public square had turned into an enormous eye that saw you. A big cage whose lid came down and caught you”. (In the Castle of My Skin)
![Page 20: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
EDWARD SAID Major critical works:
Orientalism (1978) Culture and Imperialism
(1993)
Main influences on Orientalism:
Gramsci’s theory of hegemony.
Foucault’s theory of discourse and power.
![Page 21: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
ORIENTALISM Definitions of “Orientalism”:
The history of the cultural relations between Europe and Asia.
Scientific discipline producing specialists in Oriental languages and culture.
The ideology about the Orient produced by Western scholars.
![Page 22: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ORIENTALISM The distinction between ‘the Occident’
and ‘the Orient’ is culturally made.
In Orientalist discourse non-Western people are “othered” in order to reaffirm the Western self.
Orientalism is legitimising and institutional. Literary presence.
Latent and Manifest Orientalism.
![Page 23: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
ORIENTALIST REPRESENTATION
![Page 24: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
SOME OBJECTIONS TO ORIENTALISM Monolithic and static definition of
“Orientalism”.
Misrepresentation of material realities.
Absence of counter-hegemonic thought.
![Page 25: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
GAYATRI SPIVAK Main influences:
deconstruction theory, feminism, Marxism.
Some issues studied by Spivak:
The role of the postcolonial critic and postcolonial studies and their complicity with colonialist practices.
The construction of “otherness”.
“Can the subaltern speak?”
![Page 26: Colonial discourse theories](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062513/555aa05bd8b42a3e268b5051/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
HOMI BHABHA The construction of the
colonial subject is an ambivalent process:
“Othering” of the colonial
subject vs. civilizing mission.
Partial reproduction of Western culture.
Mimicry becomes mockery Subversive potential of “hybridity” and “appropriation”.