Co Channel Interference Reduction

download Co Channel Interference Reduction

of 32

Transcript of Co Channel Interference Reduction

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    1/32

    Anup GholkarRamhari BhapkarAbhijeet Kumbhojkar

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    2/32

    Solves the problem of spectral congestion and user capacity. Offer very high capacity in a limited spectrum without major

    technological changes.

    Reuse of radio channel in different cells.

    Enable a fix number of channels to serve an arbitrarily largenumber of users by reusing the channel throughout thecoverage region.

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    3/32

    Each cellular base station is allocated a group of radio channelswithin a small geographic area called a cell.

    Neighbouring cells are assigned different channel groups.

    By limiting the coverage area to within the boundary of the cell, thechannel groups may be reused to cover different cells.

    Keep interference levels within tolerable limits. Frequency reuse or frequency

    planning seven groups of channel

    from A to G

    footprint of a cell - actual radio coverage

    omni-directional antenna vs directionalantenna

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    4/32

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    5/32

    Co-channel Interference andSystem Capacity

    To reduce co-channel interference, co-channel cell must beseparated by a minimum distance.

    When the size of the cell is approximately the sameco-channel interference is independent of the transmittedpower

    co-channel interference is a function ofR: Radius of the cell

    D: distance to the centre of the nearest co-channel cell

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    6/32

    For a hexagonal geometryQ = D/R = 3N

    A small value of Q provides large capacityA large value of Q improves the transmission quality -smaller level of co-channel interference A trade-off must be made between these two objectives

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    7/32

    Methods for improving capacity in cellular

    systems

    Cell Splitting: subdividing a congested cellinto smaller cells.

    Sectoring: directional antennas to controlthe interference and frequency reuse.

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    8/32

    Increasing the separation between twocochannel cells

    Using directional antennas at the base station

    lowering the antenna heights at the base station.

    The use of directional antennas in each cell canserve two purposes:

    - further reduction of cochannel interference

    -increasing the channel capacity when thetraffic increases.

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    9/32

    Decrease the co-channel interference and keep thecell radius Runchanged

    Replacing single omni-directional

    antenna by several directionalantennas

    Radiating within a specifiedsector

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    10/32

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    11/32

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    12/32

    The interfering site could cause interferenceat those cells within a 19 sector in front ofthe cell.

    In an ideal situation the antenna pattern ofthe serving cell must be rotated clockwise by10 such that the notch can be aimed

    properly at the interfering cell

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    13/32

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    14/32

    Purely mechanical tilt

    Fixed electrical tilt

    variable electrical tilt (VET) Remote electrical tilt (RET)

    Continuously adjustable electrical downtilt

    (CAEDT).

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    15/32

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    16/32

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    17/32

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    18/32

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    19/32

    Elements playing a major role in justifying

    antenna tilting-

    The antenna vertical pattern

    The antenna height

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    20/32

    For controlling the energy in a confined area,the umbrella-pattern antenna can bedeveloped by using a monopole with a topdisk

    The size of the disk determines the tiltingangle of the pattern. The smaller the disk, thelarger the tilting angle of the umbrellapattern.

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    21/32

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    22/32

    Energy is confined to the immediate area ofthe antenna

    Reduces cochannel and long-distanceinterference.

    We can increase antenna height still reducecochannel interference

    The frequency-reuse distance can be

    shortened

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    23/32

    Antennas are placed at the outer edges of thecell

    Any channel may be assigned to any zone by thebase station

    Mobile is served by the zone with the strongestsignal. Handoff within a cell

    No channel reassignment Switch the channel to a different zone site

    Reduce interference

    Low power transmitters are employed

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    24/32

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    25/32

    Ensure each mobile transmits the smallestpower necessary to maintain a good qualitylink on the reverse channel

    Can be controlled only by mobile station

    long battery life

    increase SIR

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    26/32

    Creating a desired pattern in a certaindirection.

    currents appearing in several parasiticantennas are caused by radiation from anearby drive antenna.

    Ways to combine a driven antenna & a singleparasite :

    - Normal spacing- Close spacing

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    27/32

    a)One-quarter wavelength

    spacing

    b)one-half wavelength spacingc)combination of a and b.

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    28/32

    1. Length of both elements same- Forms a null at the centre

    - Directive gain of 3 dB relative to a singleelement

    2. Length of parasite greater than active element

    - Parasite acts as reflector

    - Directive gain of 6 dB

    3. Length of parasite less than active element- Parasite acts as director

    - Directive gain of 8 dB

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    29/32

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    30/32

    Dominant interfererence likely exists in GSM

    Number of nearby co channel interference is rathersmallCancellation of it can improve the receiverperformanceIt depends on the dominant to rest of interference

    ratio DIR.

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    31/32

    Receiver algorithm identifies dominant

    interfering signal

    It removes it by joint phase demodulation

    System performance improves by 1.3 dB

  • 7/30/2019 Co Channel Interference Reduction

    32/32