Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

33
UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics Lab Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners Bryan Heiderscheit, PT, PhD, FAPTA Professor Orthopedics and Rehabilitation Biomedical Engineering Director, UW Runners’ Clinic Director of Research, Badger Athletic Performance Co-director, UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics Lab

Transcript of Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

Page 1: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Clinical Video Analysis for

Distance Runners

Bryan Heiderscheit, PT, PhD, FAPTA Professor

Orthopedics and Rehabilitation

Biomedical Engineering

Director, UW Runners’ Clinic

Director of Research, Badger Athletic Performance

Co-director, UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics Lab

Page 2: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Disclosures

I have no financial affiliation or involvement with any commercial organization that has a direct financial interest in any matter included in this presentation.

Page 3: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Equipment

120 fps camera

tripod

treadmill

Stiff deck

Adequate HP

treadmill

sagittal view

frontal view

Page 4: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Video Capture Procedure

Patient selects speed that reflects:

typical running speed

pain provocation

If needed, simulate fatigue by having them run before

0 incline

Run for 5 min before recording

Record:

10s sagittal

10s posterior-frontal

Page 5: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Key Parameters

Focus on loading response (initial contact to mid-stance)

characterize body control during energy absorption

Remainder of stride cycle is also examined

Initial contact Midstance

Loading Response

Page 6: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Step Rate Foot Inclination Angle at Initial Contact

Vertical Displacement of COM

Kinematic Predictors of Kinetics Peak GRFv

Peak Vertical GRF

(R2=0.48)

Wille et al. (2014). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

Page 7: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Step Rate Heel to COM Distance at Initial Contact

Foot Inclination Angle at Initial Contact

Vertical Displacement of COM

Kinematic Predictors of Kinetics Braking Impulse

Braking Impulse

(R2=0.50)

Wille et al. (2014). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

Page 8: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Step Rate Foot Inclination Angle at Initial Contact

Peak Knee Flexion during Stance

Kinematic Predictors of Kinetics Energy Absorption at Knee

Mechanical Energy Absorbed about the Knee (R2=0.58)

Wille et al. (2014). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

Page 9: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Pseudo-quantitative Approach

Estimate load to body based on posture at landing and midstance

Use physical exam findings to interpret appropriateness of running mechanics

Each parameter is assessed using 3-pt or 5-pt scale

Consideration for the inherent limitations with 2D video analysis

Key parameters demonstrated strong agreement between raters (κ > 0.80)

-2 -1 Appropriate +1 +2

Kotecki et al. (2013) J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

Page 10: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

2D Approach to Identify Key Flaws

Overstriding

Bounce

Excessive Compliance

Pipken & Heiderscheit (2016). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

Wille & Heiderscheit (2014). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

Page 11: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Joint Center Alignment Midstance

Excessive lateral

Mild lateral

Appropriate (midline)

Mild medial

Excessive medial

Lateral Deviation Appropriate Medial Deviation

Page 12: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Lateral Pelvic Tilt Midstance

Appropriate (3-5° males; 5-7° females)

Mild contralateral

Excessive contralateral

normal mild excessive

Page 13: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Foot-COM Placement at Midstance

Location of the foot with respect to the whole body’s line of gravity (LOG)

As running speed increases, this distance decreases

9:30 min/mile

Appropriate Mild

crossover Excessive crossover

Page 14: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Crossover Changes with Speed

More likely to crossover at higher speeds

Women less likely to crossover Crossover associated

with future injury in women only

Less crossover associated with increased step rate

not the case for foot strike angle

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

ML

Dis

tan

ce (

cm)

Speed (m/s)

All Subjects Men

Women

Crossover (-)

No Crossover (+)

Bui & Heiderscheit (2016) Proc, Am College Sports Med

Wille & Heiderscheit (2017) J Orthop Sports Phys Ther (abstract)

10 min/mile

5:30 min/mile

Page 15: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Knee Separation at Midstance

Appropriate Narrow with stance

leg deviation Narrow with swing

leg deviation

Narrow Appropriate Wide

Wide

Page 16: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Foot Alignment at Midstance

Rearfoot-Shoe Eversion

Toe-out

Out of plane motion can create false positives for

excessive motion

Page 17: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Foot Inclination Angle at Contact

Heel-strike (>10°)

Rearfoot Midfoot Forefoot

Page 18: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Foot Inclination Angle at Contact

heel-strike midfoot forefoot rearfoot

Page 19: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Foot Strike Pattern

Self-reported Video Assessment

Rearfoot 20%

Midfoot 26%

Forefoot 8%

Uncertain 46%

Rearfoot 80%

Midfoot 12%

Forefoot 8%

*asymmetric (n=22, ~6%)

Nelson & Heidercheit (2016) J Orthop Sports Phys Ther (abstract)

Page 20: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Horizontal Distance from Heel to COM at Contact

Page 21: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Knee Flexion Angle at Contact

Excessive decrease

Mild decrease

Appropriate (~20°)

Mild increase

Excessive increase

Page 22: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Tibial Inclination Angle at Contact

Vertical Mild

inclination Excessive inclination

Page 23: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Maximum Knee Flexion Angle

Excessive decrease

Mild decrease

Appropriate (~40°)

Mild increase

Excessive increase

Page 24: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Ankle Dorsiflexion at Midstance

Decrease Appropriate

(knees over toes) Increase

Increased ankle dorsiflexion

Page 25: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

COM Vertical Displacement

Maximum Height Minimum Height

Mid-flight Midstance

Appropriate (6-8cm)

Mild Increase

Excessive Increase

Page 26: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Avoid Overstriding

Foot inclination angle

Heel-COM distance

Knee flexion angle

Tibial angle

Page 27: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Avoid Bounce

COM vertical displacement

Maximum Height Minimum Height

Page 28: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Avoid Excessive Compliance

Partially reflected in COM vertical displacement

Evaluate frontal plane collapse

Joint center alignment

Lateral pelvic tilt

Knee separation

Foot-COM placement

Page 29: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

LBP GT

Bursitis Anterior

Knee Pain ITBS Achilles MTSS

Plantar Fasciitis

Bone Stress Injury

FRONTAL VIEW (MIDSTANCE)

Lateral Trunk Lean X

Lateral Pelvic Drop X X X

Knee Center Position X X X X

Knee Separation X X X

Foot COM placement X X X X

Rearfoot View X X X X

Forefoot View X X X

SAGITTAL VIEW

Knee Flexion (IC) X X X

Tibial Inclination (IC) X X

Foot Inclination (IC) X X

Knee Flexion (MS) X X X

Ankle Dorsiflexion (MS) X X

COM Vertical Displacement

X X X X X

Page 30: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Putting it all Together

17 y/o with chronic knee pain and tibial stress reactions

9:00 min/mile 168 steps/min

Page 31: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

19 y/o with right dorsal foot pain

7:00 min/mile 166 steps/min

Page 32: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

23y/o with Right Knee Pain

10:00 min/mile 172 steps/min

Page 33: Clinical Video Analysis for Distance Runners

UW Neuromuscular Biomechanics

Lab

Summary

Designed with the common clinician in mind Minimal overhead

Reimbursable

60min or less