CIS 562 Week 7 Case Study 2

2
CIS 562 Week 7 Case Study 2 – Strayer New Click On The Link Below To Purchase A+ Graded Material Instant Download http://budapp.net/CIS-562-Week-7-Case-Study-2-Strayer- New-CIS562W7C.htm Case Study 2: Forced Decryption Ruled Unconstitutional Read the article titled, “U.S. Courts Rule For–and Against–Protecting a Suspect's Hard Drives” located at the following IEEE Spectrum link: http://spectrum.ieee.org/riskfactor/computing/it/us- courts-rule-for-and-against-protecting-a-suspects-hard- drives Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you: 1. Analyze the decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit of Appeals to determine whether you believe the decision rendered was correct or incorrect based on the evidence suspected by the government. 2. Evaluate the effect of this ruling on forensic investigations from a forensics standpoint and determine whether or not you would consider this an “open door” for criminal activity. Justify your answer. 3. Take a position on whether or not you believe technology is moving too fast for the judicial system. Suggest at least two (2) improvements that the courts can make in order to catch up and / or keep up with the advancements in technology issues and crimes. 4. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

description

CIS 562 Week 7 Case Study 2CIS/562 Week 7 Case Study 2

Transcript of CIS 562 Week 7 Case Study 2

Page 1: CIS 562 Week 7 Case Study 2

CIS 562 Week 7 Case Study 2 – Strayer New

Click On The Link Below To Purchase A+ Graded MaterialInstant Download

http://budapp.net/CIS-562-Week-7-Case-Study-2-Strayer-New-CIS562W7C.htm

Case Study 2: Forced Decryption Ruled Unconstitutional

Read the article titled, “U.S. Courts Rule For–and Against–Protecting a Suspect's Hard Drives” located at the following IEEE Spectrum link: http://spectrum.ieee.org/riskfactor/computing/it/us-courts-rule-for-and-against-protecting-a-suspects-hard-drives

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:1. Analyze the decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit of Appeals to determine whether

you believe the decision rendered was correct or incorrect based on the evidence suspected by the government.

2. Evaluate the effect of this ruling on forensic investigations from a forensics standpoint and determine whether or not you would consider this an “open door” for criminal activity. Justify your answer.

3. Take a position on whether or not you believe technology is moving too fast for the judicial system. Suggest at least two (2) improvements that the courts can make in order to catch up and / or keep up with the advancements in technology issues and crimes.

4. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-

inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.