Chronic infections Metabolic syndrom HBV: 350-400 Millions...
Transcript of Chronic infections Metabolic syndrom HBV: 350-400 Millions...
Cirrhosis
Hepatocellular carcinoma: HCC
HBV HCV
12°
1.5-5%/year
25% /5 year
Chronic infections
HBV: 350-400 Millions
HCV: 170-200 Millions
25-30 years
10-30%
Metabolic syndrom
(Overweight,diabetes)
Non Alcoholic
Steato Hepatitis
(NASH)
Chemical
carcinogens
Iron overload
Inflammation
Fibrosis
Intestinal Microbiota
HIV
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Epidemiology data: China
2
1 Globocan 2008 (IARC) - 05/04/2011
Number of new liver cancers in
2020 1
All ages – both sexes
China
HCC prevalence is particularly high in China
and it has constantly increased over the recent years.
HCC is the 2nd
-3rd
cause of cancer death in China.
General population
70 Millions HBV
6 Millions HCV
Cirrhotic liver HCC
90% HCCs develop on cirrhotic livers
(60% in Africa)
H C C HBV HCV
CHRONIC INFLAMMATION
FIBROSIS
(IMMUNE RESPONSE
CYTOKINES)
Cirrhosis
HCV:
HCV core, E2, NS3
NS5A
Low chromosomal instability
HBV
HBx, PreS/S
HBSP
HBV DNA integration
Chromosomal instability: P53, Axin 1
LOH: 1p, 4q, 6q, 9p, 13q, 16p, 16q
Selection of HCV and HBV genome quasi-species in tumor cells
Exome sequencing in HCC
Sequencing the whole coding
region of the genome (20,000
genes)
Mean of 40 damaging somatic mutations / tumor Range: 5 to 121 /tumor
Guichard et al, Nature Genetics, 2012
Tumor Non-tumor
Each tumor result from a unique combination of mutations
IRF2 7%
P53 42%
CDKN2A
CTNNB1 42%
AXIN 1 APC
NFE2L2 10%
HBV HCC Non-HBV HCC
Major Signaling Pathways
P53 &
Cell cycle WNT/β-Catenin Oxydative
Stress
Amadeo et al, Gut 2014
Patient management
Therapeutic options
7
1 Bruix Lancet Oncology 2009; Hepatology 2010; Ferlay
Int J Cancer 2010
2 Artinyan A. Cancer 2010;116:1367-77
Intervention Curative
therapy HCC staging
Liver
transplantation Early (10%)
Resection Early (25-40%)
TACE*
RFA*
PEI*
Intermediate
Sorafenib Advanced
Palliative
therapy Advanced
HCC survival by intervention HCC current therapeutic options
Cu
mu
lati
ve s
urv
ival
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
*Trans-arterial chemoembolization
Radiofrequency ablation
Percutaneous ethanol injections
MicroRNAs as serum biomarkers: separation of serum samples from HBV, HCV and control
groups by 13 miRNAs.
Li L et al. Cancer Res 2010;70:9798-9807
© 2010 by American Association for Cancer Research
Training
set
Validation
set
Control HCV HBV
Direct and indirect effects of HBV chronic
infection
Integration of HBV DNA
Into host chromosomes :
Insertional mutagenesis
of cellular genes
Genetic
instability
Prolonged expression of viral genes
HBx, COOH-terminally deleted HBx
PreS1/PreS2/S: LHBs
Modulation of liver cell proliferation and
viability
Host immune
response
Inflammation
oxydative
stress
HBV DNA integration sites
• Frequent insertion in cellular genes: 73/93 HCC tested
• Recurrent integration sites:
- hTERT
- Calcium signalling related genes
- Mixed lineage leukemia genes: MLL2 and MLL4
- 60s ribosomal protein-like encoding genes
• Evidence for alterations in the target cellular gene
expression
Brechot Seminars in Cancer Biology 2001;
Paterlini-Brechot Oncogene 2003,
Saigo Human Mutation 2008; Murakami Gut 2005;
Tamori Clin Cancer Res 2005
TERT promoter mutations in HCC
305 hepatocellular carcinomas
179 HCC with somatic mutation of the TERT promoter (59%)
TERT promoter mutation is the most frequent somatic genetic alteration in HCC
TERT-encoding gene is a frequent insertion site for HBV DNA
Nault et al. Nature Communications,
2013
Brechot Seminars in Cancer Biology 2001;
Paterlini-Brechot Oncogene 2003,
Saigo Human Mutation 2008; Murakami Gut 2005;
Tamori Clin Cancer Res 2005
Male HBV HCV
Alcohol NASH
25 % 65 %
Preneoplastic lesions
Regenerative Dysplastic
HCC
CTNNB1 ARID1A ARID2
RPS6KA3 TP53
AXIN1 Others
Somatic mutations….
Risk factors
Cirrhotic macronodules
Malignant tumor
TERT promoter
mutations
TERT promoter mutation is the most frequent somatic genetic alteration in HCC
Cirrhosis
0 %
Telomere shortening Absence of telomerase activity
Telomerase reactivation
Nault et al. Nature Communications, 2013
HBV Genetic Variability : Impact on chronic
hepatitis severity and liver carcinogenesis?
HBV Genotypes
A: Africa
B: Asia
C: Asia
D: Mediteranean area
E: Middle Africa
F: South America
HBV genome mutations
PreS
EnhII
Basal Core promoter
(BCP)
PreCore
X
- Genotype C
- Mutations in core promoter
and PreS/S sequences
Associated
with severity: cirrhosis, HCC
Pronostic biomarkers?
Chien-Jen
Jama 2006;
295: 65-73
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HBV DNA LEVEL AND HCC
High level
HBV viremia
is a risk factor
For HCC
Available HBV Therapies
• Pegylated IFN-a
• Nucleoside/nucleotide analogues
• Lamivudine
• Adefovir
• Telbivudine
• Entecavir
• Tenofovir
• Tenofovir/emtricitabine
Cumulative Incidence of HBV
Resistance
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
24%
38%
49%
67% 70%
0%
3%
11%
18%
29%
0.5% 1.2%
1.2% 1.2%
4%
17%
0%
LAM ADV ETV LdT TDF
0.2% 0%
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
(EASL CPGs: Management of chronic hepatitis B; J Hepatol 2012;57:167-85)
3 Years Results of Entecavir
Therapy (HBeAg+ and -)
(Zoutendijk et al., Lancet 2011;54:443-51)
Cumulated
probability to
achieve virological
response
(HBV DNA <80 IU/mL)
Long-Term Histology Results on
Entecavir (HBeAg+ and -)
(Chang et al., Hepatology 2010;52:886-93)
Knodell necroinflammatory score Ishak fibrosis score
*Median follow-up: 6 years (range: 3-7 years)
HCC Incidence on ETV Therapy vs
Historical LAM and Control
(Hosaka et al., Hepatology 2013;58:98-107)
Non-cirrhotics Cirrhotics
HBV cure ?
5 Years Results of Tenofovir
Therapy (HBeAg+ and -)
HBeAg+ (n=266) HBeAg- (n=375)
Normalized ALT 73% 85%
HBV DNA <69 IU/mL (ITT) 65% 83%
HBV DNA <69 IU/mL (on Rx) 97% 99%
HBeAg loss 49% -
HBe seroconversion 40% -
HBsAg loss 10% -
HBs seroconversion 8% -
(Marcellin et al., Lancet 2013;381:468-75)
HCC Incidence in Genotype D HBV
Patients on >18 Mths NUCs
• HCC incidence: • Non-cirrhotics: 0.36 per 100 person/years
• Cirrhotics: 4.80 per 100 person/years
• Independant predictors of HCC • Cirrhosis (13-fold increased risk)
• Age >60 years (5-fold increased risk)
• Lack of virological response/resistance (NS)
(Pellicelli , et al., AASLD 2012)
HBV and liver cancer:
HBV Persistence HBsAg negative, HBV DNA positive
infections
- Risk factor for HCC developpment?
- Technological issues: sensitivity, specificity
etc..
- Real impact on liver disease severity?
HepadnaViruses as a risk factor for
HCC in seronegative individuals
Frequent liver tumors in woodchucks with resolved
WHV infection :
• 100% of chronic WHV carrier woodchucks develop
HCC
• No HCC was seen in normal, uninfected woodchucks
• 17% of WHsAg negative, serologically recovered
woodchucks develop HCC
From B. C. Tennant, Woodchuck hepadnaviruses, in Viral Hepatitis,1998
Chronic WHV carriers
N = 50
Resolved WHV infections
N = 21
Normal control animals
N = 56
HBV DNA +
vs
HBV DNA –
8.25 fold increased
Risk of HCC
Ikeda J Viral Hepatitis 2009; 16: 437
Risk of HCC in HBsAg negative, HBV DNA positive
patients Prospective studies
HBV treatments: Yes
HBV cure ?No
Therapeutic vaccines?
Drugs targeting HBV cccDNA ?
Hepatitis C virus infection: a systemic disease with the possibility to cure
• Why to treat? - Hepatic manifestations
- Extra-hepatic manifestations
- Cryoglobulinemic vasculitis
or lymphoma
But also general manifestations
related to
- “Lymphocytic activation”
associated with chronic infection
23 820 adults, Taiwan
1095 anti-HCV positive; 69.4% with detectable HCV RNA
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Persisting detectable HCV RNA is a
risk factor for liver-related mortality
The REVEAL HCV Cohort Study Follow-up (years)
Cu
mu
lati
ve m
ort
alit
y (%
)
Liver cancer
p<0.001 for comparison among three groups p<0.001 for HCV RNA detectable vs undetectable
10.4%
1.6%
0.3%
Lee M-H et al, J Infect Dis 2012;206:469–477
HCV seropositive, HCV RNA detectable
HCV seropositive, HCV RNA undetectable
HCV seronegative
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Follow-up (years)
Cu
mu
lati
ve m
ort
alit
y (%
)
Hepatic diseases
12.8%
1.6% 0.7%
p<0.001 for comparison among three groups p<0.001 for HCV RNA detectable vs undetectable
Chronic HCV increases morbi-
mortality from non-hepatic
diseases
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Follow-up (years)
Cu
mu
lati
ve m
ort
alit
y (%
)
Extrahepatic diseases
HCV seropositive, HCV RNA detectable
HCV seropositive, HCV RNA undetectable
HCV seronegative
19.8%
12.2%
11.0%
p<0.001 for comparison among three groups p=0.002 for HCV RNA detectable vs undetectable
Significant association between HCV and:
- diabetes (OR = 1.8)
- cardio-vascular morbidity (OR=2.37)
- cerebro-vascular mortality (OR= 2.7)
- renal disease (HR for ESRD
< 59 y= 7.8 vs. 3.2)
- extra-hepatic (breast: OR=2) cancers
White D et al. J Hepatol 2008;49:831–844
Su F-H et al. BMC Cancer 2011;11:495
Su F-H et al. Am J Kidney Dis 2012;60:553−560
Kakinami L et al. Int J Clin Pract 2013;67:6–13
Lee M-H et al. Stroke 2010;41:2894–2900
Lee M-H et al, J Infect Dis 2012;206:469–477
Sustained virologic response (SVR)
is the objective of therapy
• SVR= virologic cure
• Most of HCV-related manifestations are
mainly reversible
Cirrhosis reversal
Glomeluronephritis
reversal Diabetes improvement
Lymphoma
remission
HCV cure decreases mortality from both
hepatic and non-hepatic diseases
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Follow-up (years) Follow-up (years)
Cu
mu
lati
ve m
ort
alit
y (%
)
Cu
mu
lati
ve m
ort
alit
y (%
)
Hepatic diseases Extrahepatic diseases
HCV seropositive, HCV RNA detectable
HCV seropositive, HCV RNA undetectable
HCV seronegative
12.8%
1.6% 0.7%
19.8%
12.2%
11.0%
Lee M-H et al, J Infect Dis 2012;206:469–477
p<0.001 for comparison among three groups p<0.001 for HCV RNA detectable vs undetectable
p<0.001 for comparison among three groups p=0.002 for HCV RNA detectable vs undetectable
23 820 adults, Taiwan
1095 anti-HCV positive; 69.4% with detectable HCV RNA
The REVEAL HCV Cohort Study
HCV cure decreases mortality from
both hepatic and non-hepatic diseases
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Follow-up (years) Follow-up (years)
Cu
mu
lati
ve m
ort
alit
y (%
)
Cu
mu
lati
ve m
ort
alit
y (%
)
Hepatic diseases Extrahepatic diseases
HCV seropositive, HCV RNA detectable
HCV seropositive, HCV RNA undetectable
HCV seronegative
12.8%
1.6% 0.7%
19.8%
12.2%
11.0%
Lee M-H et al, J Infect Dis 2012;206:469–477
p<0.001 for comparison among three groups p<0.001 for HCV RNA detectable vs undetectable
p<0.001 for comparison among three groups p=0.002 for HCV RNA detectable vs undetectable
23 820 adults, Taiwan
1095 anti-HCV positive; 69.4% with detectable HCV RNA
The REVEAL HCV Cohort Study
Such a benefit (SVR-related reversal of hepatic and
extra-hepatic disease) has to be offered in theory to
any HCV-infected patient
Sulkowski MS and al. JAMA 2002
HR 1.03 (0.86-1.23) HR 1.05 (0.85-1.30) HR 1.28 (0.98-1.68)
No modification related to HCV
HIV/HCV Co-infection
No HAART HAART
Meta-analysis of 26 studies
Deng L, et al. World J Gastroenterol2009;15:996–1003 HAART: highly active antiretroviral therapy
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 10 1 0.1 0.01 100
Allory, 2000
Bierhoff, 1997
Di Martino, 2001
Eyster, 1993
Grabczewska, 2005
Lesens, 1999
Makris, 1996
Pol, 1998a
Pol, 1998b
Romeo, 2000
Serfaty, 2001
Soto, 1997
Telfer, 1994
Fixed effects
Random effects
Benhamou, 1999
Brau, 2006
Gaslightwala&Bini, 2006
Gonzalez, 2006
Macias, 2005
Marine-Barjoan, 2004
Martinez-Sierra, 2003
Mohsen, 2003
Monto, 2005
Rodriguez-Torrez, 2006
Sarmento-Castro, 2007
Valle Tovo, 2007
Verma, 2006
Fixed effects
Random effects
Risk ratio (95% CI) Risk ratio (95% CI)
HCV mono-infection
HIV/HCV co-infection
HCV mono-infection
HIV/HCV co-infection
HIV/HCV Co-infection: harmfull
impact of HIV
ARV liver toxicity
Soriano V et al. AIDS 2008
ddI d4T
AZT
3TC FTC
ABV TDF
EFV
NVP
SQV
ATV LPV
APV DRV
TPV
RTV
T20
NRTI NNRTI PI Newer ARVs
RAL
MRV
ETV
High risk Low risk
From: HIV, Age, and the Severity of Hepatitis C Virus–Related Liver Disease: A Cohort Study
Ann Intern Med. 2013;():. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-9-201305070-00604
Liver fibrosis and age among persons coinfected with HIV and HCV and those with only HCV.
For each age, predicted liver fibrosis scores were calculated using a regression equation that included the race, sex, alcohol use, body mass index, hepatitis B virus surface antigen level status, and HCV RNA level values for a representative participant (black overweight male who has no regular alcohol use, is hepatitis B virus surface antigen–negative, and has high HCV viral load) for persons coinfected with HIV and HCV (dashed line) and for persons with only HCV (solid line). For example, a 40-year-old HIV and HCV coinfected person with these characteristics was calculated to have a predicted FibroScan score of 9.04 kPa. For this same degree of fibrosis, the predicted age in a similar person but with only HCV was 49.2 years. Over the entire age range, the average difference in estimated age between persons coinfected with HIV and HCV and those with only HCV was 9.2 years (90% coverage limit, 5.2 to 14.3 years). HCV = hepatitis C virus.
Figure Legend:
HIV/HCV Co-infection: harmfull
impact of HIV
Mortality of 69.913 french PLWHIV (2008-2012)
Adjusted on age, gender, alcohol, decompensated cirrhosis, AIDS
Mallet V et al. CROI 2014
HCV infection is a severe disease
in PLWHIV
HIV
HBV/HIV
HCV/HIV
Hepatitis C therapy in 2014
HCV Cure
Four pivotal Peg-IFN/RBV studies in HIV/HCV co-infected patients Characteristic APRICOT1 ACTG 50712 RIBAVIC3 Barcelona4
Number enrolled 868 133 412 95
Peg-IFN 2a 2a 2b 2b
RBV 800 mg 600 mg up to 1 g 800 mg 800 mg up to 1.2 g
HIV and CD4 status
>200 cells/mm3 or 100–200
cells/mm3 if HIV-RNA <5000 copies/mL
>100 cells/mm3 + HIV-RNA <10,000
copies/mL or >300 cells/mm3,
tx naïve + not starting ART during trial
>200 cells/mm3
>250 cells/mm3 and HIV-RNA <10,000
copies/mL
ALT “elevated” NA NA >1.5x ULN
Genotype 1, % 60–61 77–78 48 49
Bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis, %
15–16 9–11 (cirrhosis) 39 30
Genotype 1 Peg-IFN/RBV SVR rate, n/N (%)
51/176 (29) 7/51 (14) 21/123 (17)* 22/59 (38)*
1.Torriani FJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2004;351:438–50; 2. Chung RT, et al. N Engl J Med 2004;351:451–9; 3. Carrat F, et al. JAMA 2004;292:2839–484
4. LagunoM, et al. AIDS 2004;18:F27–36
*Genotype 1 or 4 ART: ARV therapy; Peg-IFN: peginterferon; RBV: ribavirin SVR: sustained virologic response; tx: treatment; ULN: upper limit of normal
E1 C E2 p7 NS2 NS3 NS4A NS4B NS5A NS5B
Viral targets Host targets
Understanding of HCV life cycle
revealed several potential
innovative drug targets
*
*On clinical hold, Idenix press release; **On clinical hold, Novartis press release
NS3 NS5A NS5B Cyclophilin A The NS3/4A serine protease is
essential for post-translational
processing of HCV
polyproteins1
Multifunctional membrane-associated phosphoprotein essential component of the HCV-RNA replication complex2,3
NS5B is an HCV-specific, RNA-
dependent RNA polymerase1
Host protein involved in HCV
replication through interaction
with NS5A and the HCV
polymerase4
Boceprevir
Telaprevir
ABT-450/r, ACH-1625
Asunaprevir, Simeprevir, BI-
201335
Danoprevir/r, GS-9451
MK-5172
Daclatasvir
GS-5885
ABT-267
PPI-668
Nucleos(t)ide analogue
Sofosbuvir, Mericitabine,
IDX-184*
Non-nucleoside analogue
BI-207127, ABT-333
ABT-072, BMS-791325
Tegobuvir, Setrobuvir
VX-222, Filibuvir
Alisporivir**
SCY-635
Adapted from 1. Pawlotsky JM, et al. Gastroenterology 2007;132:1979–98; 2. Tellinghuisen TL, et al. Nature 2005;435:374–9; 3. Gish R & Meanwell NA. Clin Liver Dis. 2011;15:627–39; 4. Coelmont L, et al. PLoS One 2010;5:e13678.
« 2011 » DAAs
2011-2014
Combination PEG-IFN – RBV Treatments with IFN
Treatment of chronic hepatitis C
SVR in GT1 45% 60-75%
EASL guidelines 2011
2011 DAAs
2011-2013
Combination PEG-IFN – RBV Treatments with IFN
Treatment of chronic hepatitis C
SVR in GT1 45% 75% 75-95%
Sofosbuvir 1Q14 Simeprevir 2Q14 Daclatasvir 3Q14
New DAAs
Combination PEG-IFN – RBV
- Better efficacy (pan-genotypic)
- Better tolerability - Reduction of duration - Easier dosing schedule - Reduced pill burden
Summary of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir + RBV studies
1 Mangia A et al., EASL 2014, Abs. O164;;2Afdhal N et al., EASL2014, Abs. O109; 3 Kowdley KV et al. Etats-Unis, EASL 2014, Abs. O56 actualisé
ION-1 1
12 vs 24 w. G1 naïves
ION-2 2
12 vs 24 w. Pretreated G1
ION-3 3
8 vs 12 w. G1 naïve non cirrhotics
98 %
99 %
99 %
97 %
99 %
99 %
94 %
96 %
94 %
93 %
SVR 12
SOF + LDV
SOF + LDV + RBV
SOF + LDV
SOF + LDV + RBV
SOF + LDV
SOF + LDV + RBV
SOF + LDV
SOF + LDV + RBV
SOF + LDV
SOF + LDV + RBV
SOF + LDV
0 8 12 24 w.
95 %
EASL 2014
An almost universal virologic cure
Options in 2014
• IFN-based regimens
• Sofosbuvir + Peg-IFNa + ribavirin (all genotypes)
• Simeprevir + Peg-IFNa + ribavirin (genotypes 1, 4)
• Daclatasvir + Peg-IFNa + ribavirin (genotypes 1, 3,
4-6)
• IFN-free regimens
• Sofosbuvir + ribavirin (genotypes 2, 3)
• Sofosbuvir + simeprevir (genotypes 1, 4)
• Sofosbuvir + daclatasvir (genotypes 1, 3, 4-6)
Osinusi A, et al. JAMA. 2013;310(8):804-811.
Sulkowski MS, et al. AASLD 2013. #212.
Zeuzem S, et al. AASLD 2013#1085.
Lawitz E, et al. N Engl J Med. 2013 May 16;368(20):1878-87.
GT 1 SOF + RBV
24 weeks
GT 2 SOF + RBV
12 weeks
GT 3 SOF + RBV
12 weeks
SOF + RBV: Comparison HCV mono- vs. HCV/HIV co-infected
GT 3 SOF + RBV
24 weeks
SVR
12
(%
)
68 76
0
20
40
60
80
100
SPARE PHOTON-1
SVR
12
(%
)
93 88
0
20
40
60
80
100
VALENCE PHOTON-1 SV
R1
2 (
%) 56
67
0
20
40
60
80
100
FISSION PHOTON-1
SVR
12
(%
)
85
0
20
40
60
80
100
VALENCE
An almost universal virologic cure
Osinusi A, et al. JAMA. 2013;310(8):804-811.
Sulkowski MS, et al. AASLD 2013. #212.
Zeuzem S, et al. AASLD 2013#1085.
Lawitz E, et al. N Engl J Med. 2013 May 16;368(20):1878-87.
GT 1 SOF + RBV
24 weeks
GT 2 SOF + RBV
12 weeks
GT 3 SOF + RBV
12 weeks
SOF + RBV: Comparison HCV mono- vs HCV/HIV coinfected
GT 3 SOF + RBV
24 weeks
SVR
12
(%
)
68 76
0
20
40
60
80
100
SPARE PHOTON-1
SVR
12
(%
)
93 88
0
20
40
60
80
100
VALENCE PHOTON-1 SV
R1
2 (
%) 56
67
0
20
40
60
80
100
FISSION PHOTON-1
SVR
12
(%
)
85
0
20
40
60
80
100
VALENCE
The concept of difficult-to-treat population
has been removed by the antiviral potency of DAAs
An almost universal virologic cure
Hepatitis C therapy in 2014
Question: Universal access to affordable
price to save lives ??
HCC
HBV HCV
Alcohol
Metabolic disorders
Obesity,diabetes: 3-5 fold increased HCC risk
Non Alcoholic Steato Hepatitis(NASH)
Chemical
Carcinogens
(Aflatoxin)
Iron overload
(Hemochromatosis)
Steatosis Steatohepatitis
Stable… Fibrosis /cirrhosis
INFECTIOUS AGENTS
Viruses
Bacteria
Fungi
Parasites?
NUTRITION-METABOLISM
Host infected cells
Bacterial metabolism
The interplay between infection
metabolism and nutrition
HCV and liver lipid metabolism:
HCV particles assembly around lipid structures
HCV chronic infection induces liver steatosis;
a risk factor for fibrosis
Chronic active
hepatitis
Cirrhosis
HCC
HBV
HCV
Intestinal
microbiota
Metabolic
Disorders
Non
Alcoholic
Steato
Hepatitis
(NASH)
The gut microbiota
.. 10 times more bacteria in our gut (1014
)
than eucaryotic cells in our body (1013
)!
. 10-100 times more genes in intestinal
bacteria vs human genome !
. 1.5 kg; 40% of fecal weight
Only 30% of the gut bacteria can be cultured
(with standard protocols…)
F Sommer and F Bäckhed Nature Reviews Microbiology 2013
Inflammation
Animal transfer: NAFLD is « transplantable »:
Fecal transplantation
Modification of intestinal microbiota in patients
with NASH
Chronic active
hepatitis
Cirrhosis
HCC
HBV
HCV
Intestinal
microbiota
Metabolic
Disorders
Non
Alcoholic
Steato
Hepatitis
(NASH)
TLR4-/-
TLR4 WT
LPS/ TLR4 signalisation pathway and gut microbiota
play a role in hepatic carcinogenesis
Dapito DH et al., Cancer Cell, 2012
ATB
Experimental protocol of HCC induction:
DEN + CCl4 in mice:
- Knock dowm for TLR4 gene
- WT treated with LPS
- WT treated with antibiotics
LPS
Mecanism of HCC progression.
Inflammation mediated by LPS-TLR4-NF-kB pathways
actives mitogenic factors expression
Darnaud M et al., J Hepatol. 2013
Yoshimoto et al. Nature 2013
Microbiome-based strategies for cancer prevention and
treatment
Schwabe RF et al., Nature Reviews Cancer. 2013
Cirrhosis
Hepatocellular carcinoma: HCC
HBV HCV
12°
1.5-5%/year
25% /5 year
Chronic infections
HBV: 350-400 Millions
HCV: 170-200 Millions
25-30 years
10-30%
Metabolic syndrom
(Overweight,diabetes)
Non Alcoholic
Steato Hepatitis
(NASH)
Chemical
carcinogens
Iron overload
Inflammation
Fibrosis
Intestinal Microbiota
HIV
HCC
Novel therapies
Targeted chemotherapy
Oncolytic viruses
Therapeutic vaccines
Biomarkers:
-early diagnosis
- prognosis, theranostics
Chronic
hepatitis
Cirrhosis
HBV
HCV
Na-Iodine symporter (NIS) and Iodide 131 for gene therapy-
mediated HCC
Faivre :Cancer Research 2004; Liu:Gastroenterology 2007 Hervé: Human Gene Therapy
2008
Antivirals
Therapeutic
vaccines?
Vaccination
HBV: yes
HCV: no