Children's Planning Table Service Working Group June 20, 2013.
-
Upload
colleen-lang -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Children's Planning Table Service Working Group June 20, 2013.
Interesting Things….Children's Planning Table Service Working
GroupJune 20, 2013
• How will children and families be seamlessly connected across different programs and services in the integrated services system?
• How will you minimize the number of times families are asked to provide information?
• How will you minimize the number of times children must complete similar screening or assessment tools?
• How will the integrated system respect the diverse needs of different populations?
• What information technology tools and structures are required to support your integrated system?
MCYS Deliverable #8
The Value of Early Childhood Indicators: Guiding Action (FSG)
Key Worker Model
Why is Key Worker Model Beneficial?
Typical Pattern Typical Experience
More health/ development challenges = more services received
More services received = more service agencies/providers
More service agencies/ providers = more service locations
Less family-centred Increased stress Desire for a single
point of contact Desire for a trusted
person to support them getting what they need
PEOPLE(engaged
employees)
QUALITY OF LIFE
TRUST(trust and
confidence)SERVICE(citizen
satisfaction)
Example from the Region of Waterloo
The Public-Sector Value-Chain
Example from the Region of Waterloo
1. Timeliness
Drivers of Satisfaction
2. Staff Performance
3. Ease of Access
4. Clear Process
5. Outcome
PEOPLE(engaged
employees)
QUALITY OF LIFE
TRUST(trust and
confidence)SERVICE(citizen
satisfaction)
Reports: 2004, 2007, 2010
Neighbourhood data on child (0-6) well-being:◦ Child population ◦ Fundamental needs (e.g., low income families)◦ Health and development (e.g., breastfeeding)◦ Relationships – family and community (e.g.,
number of licensed child care spaces)◦ Early Development Instrument (EDI)◦ Kindergarten Parent Survey (KPS)
Community Fit for Children
Most EDI domains/sub domains indicate that children in Waterloo region are doing well. Exceptions…◦ "gross and fine motor skills” (Physical Health &
Wellbeing) ◦ “overall social competence with peers” (Social
Competence)◦ 1/12 children score low on at least one domain
KPS revealed that almost half (45.3%) of respondents do not have disposable income on a consistent basis to cover unexpected expenses or put towards savings.
Community Fit for Children (2010)