Industrial Wind Farm Noise Thor Vandehei, PhD (Physics, UCSD)
CHERRY TREE WIND FARM ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE … · Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise...
Transcript of CHERRY TREE WIND FARM ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE … · Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise...
Sonus Pty Ltd 17 Ruthven Avenue
ADELAIDE SA 5000 Phone: 08 8231 2100
Facsimile: 08 8231 2122 www.sonus.com.au
ABN: 67 882 843 130
CHERRY TREE WIND FARM
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
S3768C3
18th April 2012
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1
THE NEW ZEALAND STANDARD ....................................................................................... 2
Criteria ............................................................................................................................... 2
High Amenity Areas ........................................................................................................... 2
Landowners with Commercial Agreements ........................................................................ 3
Background Noise Monitoring ............................................................................................ 3
SUBSTATION NOISE ........................................................................................................... 6
ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................... 7
ISO 9613-2:1996 ............................................................................................................... 8
Predicted Turbine Noise Levels ......................................................................................... 9
Infrasound ....................................................................................................................... 10
Substation ....................................................................................................................... 11
CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 13
APPENDICES..................................................................................................................... 14
Appendix A: Location of Operational Noise Sources........................................................ 14
Appendix B: Residence Locations ................................................................................... 15
Appendix C: Photographs of Logger Locations ................................................................ 18
Appendix D: Noise Correlations ....................................................................................... 20
Appendix E: Predicted Wind Farm Noise and Relevant Criteria ....................................... 22
Appendix F: Noise Contour .............................................................................................. 25
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 1 INTRODUCTION
Sonus Pty Ltd has been engaged by Infigen Energy to conduct an environmental noise
assessment of the proposed Cherry Tree Wind Farm, located near Seymour, Victoria.
The assessment has been conducted in accordance with New Zealand Standard
NZS 6808:2010 “Acoustics – Wind Farm Noise” (the New Zealand Standard), and has been
based on:
The layout of the proposed wind farm, detailed in Appendix A;
The location of residences in the vicinity of the proposed wind farm, detailed in
Appendix B;
Vestas V112 3MW wind turbines being used for the proposed layout; and,
Background noise monitoring conducted at 3 relevant locations between the 23rd of
November and the 21st of December 2011.
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 2 THE NEW ZEALAND STANDARD
The Policy and planning guidelines for development of wind energy facilities in Victoria1
require that an acoustic assessment is conducted in accordance with the New Zealand
Standard.
Criteria
Section 5.2 of the New Zealand Standard states:
As a guide to the limits of acceptability at a noise sensitive location, at any wind speed
wind farm sound levels LA90(10min) should not exceed the background sound level by more
than 5dB, or a level of 40 dB LA90(10min), whichever is the greater.
High Amenity Areas
The New Zealand Standard contains provisions for residences situated in high amenity
areas, deemed applicable when “a plan promotes a higher degree of protection of amenity
related to the sound environment of a particular area”. In high amenity areas, the noise limit
becomes the background noise level plus 5 dB(A), or a level of 35 dB(A), whichever is
greater.
Dwellings within the vicinity of the proposed wind farm are located within a “Farming Zone”
of the Mitchell and Murrindindi shire councils. For the purposes of this assessment, it is
assumed that such a zone does not promote a specific and higher degree of protection of
amenity.
1 Policy and planning guidelines for development of wind energy facilities in Victoria, Victorian
Department of Planning and Community Development, August 2011
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 3 Landowners with Commercial Agreements
The landowners of several residences have entered into commercial agreements with the
developer of the wind farm (associated landowners). The associated landowners are listed in
Appendix B.
Suitable noise criteria will be agreed between the developer and the associated landowner.
However, to protect associated landowners in this project from unreasonable interference
to amenity, reference has been made to the WHO Guidelines 2 . The WHO Guidelines
recommend an indoor level of 30 dB(A) is achieved to protect against sleep disturbance. The
indoor limit of 30 dB(A) equates to an outdoor noise level of 45 dB(A) with windows open or
52 dB(A) with windows closed.
It is proposed that the base noise level at associated landowners achieve the
recommendations of the WHO Guidelines. The WHO Guidelines recommended levels are
not as onerous as the New Zealand Standard’s limits of acceptability.
Background Noise Monitoring
Initial predictions of noise from the wind farm resulted in noise levels below 35 dB(A) at all
dwellings without a commercial agreement (non-associated landowners). The New Zealand
Standard does not require background noise monitoring where the predicted noise level is
below 35 dB(A), however 3 monitoring locations (R20, R42 and R75) were selected, where
preference was given to non-associated landowners with the highest predicted noise levels,
subject to access being granted.
The background noise levels were measured between the 23rd of November and the 21st of
December 2011, in accordance with the New Zealand Standard.
2 “WHO Guidelines for Community Noise” World Health Organisation, 1999
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 4 The background noise was measured with Rion NL21 type 2 sound level meters, which have
a noise floor less than 20 dB(A), calibrated at the beginning and end of the measurement
period with a Rion NC74 Calibrator. All microphones were fitted with 90mm diameter
weather proof windshields, with the microphone approximately 1500mm above ground level.
Each noise logger was positioned at an equivalent distance from the facade of the dwelling
as any significant trees at that location, whilst minimising the influence of fixed noise sources
such as local domestic pumps or air conditioning units. The background noise level was
measured in 10 minute intervals at each of the monitoring locations. Photographs of the
noise monitoring equipment at each location are provided in Appendix C.
During the background noise monitoring campaign Infigen Energy measured the wind speed
with a locally positioned meteorological mast, in 10 minute intervals at various heights.
Details of the meteorological mast are provided below in Table 1.
Table 1: Meteorological Mast Details
Measurement Heights (m)
Position (NAD 83 – Zone55)
Easting Northing
80.4, 66, 41.2, 11.2 346685 5892457
During the background noise measurement periods, rainfall and wind speed at the
microphone height (approximately 1.5m above ground level) were also measured at
Residence R75, using a HOBO Micro Station Logger H21-002. The rainfall and wind speed
data collected were used to determine the periods when weather directly on the microphone
may have affected the background noise measurement. This affected noise data was
discarded before further analysis. The discarded data is for periods where rainfall was
measured and/or where the measured wind speed exceeded 5 m/s at the microphone for
more than 90% of the measurement period.
In addition to weather, other noise events have been excluded. Specifically, where the
LA90,10min noise level rose sharply for a short period of time, indicating a local intermittent
event. An activity log was maintained by the residents at R75, which was used to assist in
the removal of data at this location.
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 5 Table 2 summarises the number of remaining data points at each monitoring location,
following the removal procedure. It is noted that the New Zealand Standard requires a
minimum of 10 days of logging, which typical results in 1440 useable data points.
Table 2: Useable Data Points at Monitoring Location
Residence ID Number of Remaining
Data Points
R20 3428
R42 3398
R75 3333
The resultant background noise data collected at the monitoring locations were correlated
with wind speed data at the top of the local meteorological mast. A least squares regression
analysis of the data was undertaken to determine the line of best fit for the correlations in
accordance with the New Zealand Standard. The data and the regression curves are shown
in Appendix D. Based on this regression analysis, the background noise level (LA90,10min) at a
range of wind speeds within the operating range of the turbines is shown in Table 3 below.
Table 3: Background Noise Levels at Monitoring Location (dB(A))
80.4m AGL Wind Speed (m/s)
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
R20 35 35 36 36 37 37 38 38 39 40
R42 30 30 30 30 31 31 32 33 35 36
R75 25 27 29 31 32 34 35 36 38 39
From the above, the assessment criteria at each residential location have been determined
for both associated and non-associated landowners, summarised in Appendix E. Generally,
the background noise level measurements are used to represent dwellings where noise
monitoring was not conducted. In these circumstances, it is common practice to adopt the
criteria of the monitoring location which best represents that dwelling. However, in this
instance, a conservative approach has been taken and the lowest measured background
level at any of the 3 locations has been applied at all other dwellings to derive the criteria.
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 6 SUBSTATION NOISE
To assess substation noise the Noise from Industry in Regional Victoria Guidelines3 (the
NIRV) has been referenced. The NIRV specifically excludes the assessment of wind energy
facilities, except for noise from substations and transmission infrastructure.
The NIRV provides recommended maximum noise levels based on the planning zone of the
noise source and noise receiver. Based on the “Farming Zone” in which the turbines and
relevant residences are located, the most onerous (i.e. lowest) criterion is 36 dB(A) LAeq4.
3 Noise from Industry in Regional Victoria, EPA Victoria, October 2011.
4 This criterion corresponds to the recommended night-time (10pm to 7am) maximum noise level.
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 7 ASSESSMENT
Noise from the wind farm has been predicted based on the use of Vestas V112 3MW model
turbines. The proposed wind farm consists of 16 turbines with the coordinates of each given
in Appendix A.
The predictions of turbine noise have been based on manufacturers sound power level data.
The octave band sound power levels used to predict noise from the wind farm are provided
below in Table 4.
Table 4: Vestas V112 Sound Power Levels (dB(A))
Octave Band Centre
Frequency (Hz)
Hub-Height Wind Speed (m/s)
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
31.5 65.2 66.8 68.7 70.5 73.8 76.0 77.1 77.6 77.5 77.4
63 75.4 77.0 78.9 80.9 84.5 87.4 89.5 90.2 90.4 90.4
125 82.3 83.9 86.0 88.2 91.2 93.5 95.2 95.8 96.0 96.1
250 85.2 86.8 89.0 91.4 93.8 95.8 97.0 96.6 96.1 95.8
500 87.5 89.1 91.3 93.9 96.6 98.5 99.4 99.0 98.5 98.1
1000 89.4 91.0 93.1 95.6 98.7 100.5 101.4 101.6 101.7 101.6
2000 88.3 89.9 92.2 95.1 96.3 97.4 98.4 99.5 100.0 100.3
4000 82.7 84.3 86.5 89.2 90.5 91.2 91.9 94.3 95.1 95.6
8000 66.7 68.3 70.7 73.7 77.8 79.7 80.7 83.9 85.3 86.4
Total 94.5 96.1 98.3 100.9 103.3 104.5 106.1 106.4 106.5 106.5
The predictions have been conducted without a penalty for the presence of tonal
characteristics. To provide certainty with respect to tonality, it is recommended that a
guarantee is sought that the manufacturers achieve a “tonal audibility” (ΔLa,k) of 0 dB when
assessed in accordance with IEC61400-115 at a distance specified in that standard. The
guarantee should be specified as part of the procurement process.
5 IEC61400-11 Wind turbine systems – Part 11: Acoustic noise measurement techniques
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 8 As well as separately considering noise from the substation against the NIRV, noise from the
substation has been included in the wind turbine noise predictions, to provide a conservative
assessment approach. It is proposed that a 45 MVA transformer is to be located in the
position listed in Appendix A. The octave band sound power levels of the transformer have
been derived from the Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 60076.10:20096. Table 5
lists the octave band sound power levels used to predict the transformer noise.
Table 5: 45MVA Transformer, Sound Power Levels (dB(A))
Octave Band Centre Frequency
(HZ) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Total
SWL (dB(A)) 68.3 76.3 83.8 86.2 78.4 75.6 68.4 64.3 89.1
It is recommended that a guarantee is sought as part of the procurement process that the
transformer combined with ancillary equipment achieves the above sound power levels.
ISO 9613-2:1996
Noise predictions were conducted using the propagation model, ISO 9613-2:1996 “Acoustics
– Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors” (ISO 9613). This noise propagation
model is widely accepted as an appropriate model for the assessment of wind farms when
appropriate inputs are used. The ISO 9613 model has the ability to take into account the
distance between the source and receiver, topography, hardness of the ground and
atmospheric absorption at different frequencies.
The ISO-9613 model is based on “meteorological conditions favourable to propagation…
These conditions are for downwind propagation...or, equivalently, propagation under a well
developed moderate ground based temperature inversion” (ISO-9613).
6
Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 60076.10:2009, Power Transformers Part 10:
Determination of sound levels (IEC 60076-10, Ed.1 (2001) MOD).
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 9 The assessment has been based on the following inputs, agreed upon by UK experts7 in a
joint paper:
Unwarranted sound power levels
10°C temperature
70% relative humidity
Acoustically hard ground
Barrier attenuation of no greater than 2 dB(A)
1.5m receiver height
Predicted Turbine Noise Levels
An analysis of the effect of wind turbine hub-height on the predicted noise level was
conducted for available hub-heights of the Vestas V112 of between 84 and 100m. The
change in the hub-height has a negligible effect on the predicted noise levels. For the
purposes of this assessment the noise predictions were therefore conducted at a hub-height
of 84m above ground level, which is of a similar order to the top of the meteorological mast.
The predicted noise from the wind farm has been assessed against the criteria contained
within the New Zealand Standard. Appendix E lists the predicted noise from the turbines and
the criteria for each residence at each relevant wind speed. Based on the predicted noise
levels shown in Appendix E, the turbines are predicted to easily comply with the relevant
criteria at all residences (both with and without an agreement) for all wind speeds.
To supplement the assessment summary in Appendix E, a noise contour map has been
included as Appendix F. The contour map has been generated for the wind speed
associated with the highest sound power level of the Vestas V112 model turbine (13m/s).
The highest predicted noise level for a non-associated residence is 33 dB(A), at residence
R62 for a wind speed of 13 m/s. At such levels, a background noise analysis is not required,
and the “high amenity” criteria set aside by the Standard would also be achieved.
7 Institute of Acoustics Vol 34 No.2 March/April 2009, “Prediction and Assessment of Wind Turbine
Noise – Agreement about relevant factors for noise assessment from wind energy projects”
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 10 Whilst the Vestas V112-3MW wind turbine model has been considered for the proposed
layout and found to easily achieve the criteria provided by the New Zealand Standard for any
hub-height up to 100m, it may not be the final turbine selection for the wind farm.
Notwithstanding, any other model of wind turbine with equivalent or lower sound power
levels will also easily achieve the New Zealand Standard.
Infrasound
Infrasound is generally defined as noise at frequencies less than 20 Hz. The generation of
infrasound was detected on early turbine designs, which incorporated the blades ‘downwind’
of the tower structure. The mechanism for the generation was that the blade passed through
the wake caused by the presence of the tower.
Modern turbines locate the blades upwind of the tower and it is found that turbines of
contemporary design produce much lower levels of infrasound.
Infrasound is often described as inaudible, however, sound below 20 Hz remains audible
provided that the sound level is sufficiently high. The thresholds of hearing for infrasound
have been determined in a range of studies. Non-audible perception of infrasound through
felt vibrations in various parts of the body only occurs at levels well above the threshold of
hearing.
Weighting networks are applied to measured sound pressure levels to adjust for certain
characteristics. The A-weighting network (dB(A)) is the most common, and it is applied to
simulate the human response for sound in the most common frequency range. The A-
weighting network is used by the New Zealand Standard. The G-weighting network has been
standardised to determine the human perception and annoyance due to noise that lies within
the infrasound frequency range.
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 11 A common audibility threshold from the range of studies is an infrasound noise level of
85 dB(G) or greater. This is used by the Queensland Department of Environment and
Resource Management’s draft Guideline for the assessment of low frequency noise as the
acceptable level of infrasound in the environment from a noise source to protect against the
potential onset of annoyance and is consistent with other approaches, including the UK
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Whilst the aerodynamic noise from a rotating turbine blade produces energy in the
infrasound range, a large range of measurements of infrasound noise emissions from
modern upwind turbines indicates that at distances of 200 metres, infrasound is in the order
of 25 dB below the recognised perception threshold of 85 dB(G). A 25 dB difference is
significant and represents at least a 100 fold difference in energy content. Infrasound also
reduces in level when moving away from the source, and separation distances between wind
farms and dwellings are well in excess of 200m.
Notwithstanding the above, there are natural sources of infrasound including wind and
breaking waves, and a wide range of man-made sources such as industrial processes,
vehicles and air conditioning and ventilation systems that make infrasound prevalent in the
natural and urban environment at a similar or greater level than that regularly measured
within 200m of a modern wind turbine.
Substation
Noise from the substation has been included into the wind farm predictions. At residence
R70, the worst case residence (closest to the proposed substation location), located
approximately 1840m from the proposed substation, the predicted substation noise is
14 dB(A). This level easily achieves the criterion of 36 dB(A) recommended by the NIRV,
and as such will not adversely impact on the amenity of residences in the locality of the wind
farm.
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 12 It is understood that the location of the substation has not been finalised, and flexibility in its
location is desired. Based on predictions of noise from the substation, its location can vary
anywhere within a 1km radius of the nominated location, whilst maintaining compliance with
the NIRV and the New Zealand Standard at all residences.
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 13 CONCLUSION
An environmental noise assessment of the proposed Cherry Tree Wind Farm, comprising a
16 turbine layout, has been made. Noise from operation of the wind farm has been assessed
against the New Zealand Standard.
It is predicted that the wind farm will easily achieve the New Zealand Standard at all
dwellings for the proposed layout and a Vestas V112-3MW model turbine selection with hub-
heights up to 100m.
In addition, any turbine with sound power levels equal to or less than that assessed for the
V112 turbines, will also easily achieve the New Zealand Standard.
Noise from the proposed substation has been assessed against the provisions of the Noise
from Industry in Regional Victoria Guidelines (the NIRV), and conservatively included in the
wind farm predictions. Based on the nominated location of the substation, it is predicted that
the substation will easily comply with the NIRV at all relevant dwellings.
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 14 APPENDICES
Appendix A: Location of Operational Noise Sources
Turbine ID Easting Northing Turbine ID Easting Northing
WT01 345477 5893385 WT10 345251 5892059
WT02 345762 5893250 WT11 345019 5892053
WT03 346068 5893036 WT12 345186 5891362
WT04 346317 5892775 WT13 344782 5892039
WT05 346579 5892639 WT14 344561 5891994
WT06 346834 5892599 WT15 344335 5891945
WT07 347081 5892580 WT16 344661 5891298
WT08 346010 5892384 Substation
WT09 345517 5892182 - 345987 5892820
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 15 Appendix B: Residence Locations
Residence ID Associated Easting Northing Closest Turbine
R1 No 346453 5886700 WT12, 4831(m)
R2 No 346908 5887108 WT12, 4589(m)
R3 No 344570 5887559 WT16, 3740(m)
R4 No 348443 5887575 WT12, 4995(m)
R5 No 344679 5887658 WT16, 3640(m)
R6 No 346167 5887743 WT12, 3750(m)
R7 No 345923 5887770 WT12, 3667(m)
R8 No 343899 5887831 WT16, 3550(m)
R9 No 343866 5887841 WT16, 3547(m)
R10 No 343242 5887846 WT16, 3732(m)
R11 No 343790 5887865 WT16, 3542(m)
R12 No 346323 5887931 WT12, 3614(m)
R13 No 342703 5888009 WT16, 3828(m)
R14 No 345869 5888142 WT12, 3292(m)
R15 No 343728 5888180 WT16, 3255(m)
R16 No 345828 5888214 WT12, 3213(m)
R17 No 342914 5888415 WT16, 3371(m)
R18 No 342609 5888531 WT16, 3445(m)
R19 Yes 345005 5888658 WT16, 2662(m)
R20 No 343961 5888709 WT16, 2682(m)
R21 No 342279 5889027 WT16, 3291(m)
R22 No 342699 5889038 WT16, 2993(m)
R23 No 342386 5889243 WT16, 3066(m)
R24 No 342781 5889258 WT16, 2774(m)
R25 No 342594 5889326 WT16, 2857(m)
R26 No 343459 5889638 WT16, 2049(m)
R27 No 343306 5889696 WT16, 2098(m)
R28 No 341827 5889798 WT16, 3206(m)
R29 No 341500 5889850 WT16, 3477(m)
R30 No 341443 5890171 WT15, 3393(m)
R31 No 341272 5890283 WT15, 3485(m)
R32 No 341834 5890335 WT15, 2974(m)
R33 No 341462 5890366 WT15, 3278(m)
R34 No 341789 5890426 WT15, 2965(m)
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 16
Residence ID Associated Easting Northing Closest Turbine
R35 No 340986 5890512 WT15, 3643(m)
R36 No 340877 5890846 WT15, 3628(m)
R37 Yes 343008 5891173 WT15, 1535(m)
R38 No 340559 5891245 WT15, 3840(m)
R39 No 350774 5891683 WT07, 3800(m)
R40 No 350970 5891704 WT07, 3986(m)
R41 No 340635 5891704 WT15, 3708(m)
R42 No 349889 5891767 WT07, 2923(m)
R43 No 340873 5891863 WT15, 3463(m)
R44 No 340925 5892051 WT15, 3412(m)
R45 No 340693 5892056 WT15, 3644(m)
R46 No 340640 5892106 WT15, 3699(m)
R47 No 340894 5892185 WT15, 3449(m)
R48 No 339443 5892193 WT15, 4898(m)
R49 No 340678 5892206 WT15, 3666(m)
R50 No 340803 5892304 WT15, 3550(m)
R51 No 340653 5892361 WT15, 3705(m)
R52 No 340697 5892405 WT15, 3667(m)
R53 No 340559 5892516 WT15, 3819(m)
R54 No 339554 5892606 WT15, 4826(m)
R55 No 341835 5892666 WT15, 2602(m)
R56 No 340593 5892834 WT15, 3846(m)
R57 No 340491 5892907 WT15, 3963(m)
R58 No 339523 5892935 WT15, 4913(m)
R59 No 340303 5893001 WT15, 4168(m)
R60 No 340493 5893002 WT15, 3985(m)
R61 No 340702 5893129 WT15, 3821(m)
R62 No 349075 5893204 WT07, 2089(m)
R63 No 341863 5893215 WT15, 2779(m)
R64 No 340048 5893234 WT15, 4477(m)
R65 No 339588 5893324 WT15, 4943(m)
R66 No 349542 5893386 WT07, 2590(m)
R67 No 349611 5893391 WT07, 2657(m)
R68 No 341385 5893536 WT15, 3352(m)
R69 No 340258 5894454 WT15, 4787(m)
R70 Yes 346788 5894467 WT02, 1592(m)
R71 Yes 346803 5894681 WT02, 1770(m)
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 17
Residence ID Associated Easting Northing Closest Turbine
R72 No 349586 5894817 WT07, 3358(m)
R73 No 340692 5894848 WT15, 4658(m)
R74 No 349156 5894899 WT07, 3112(m)
R75 No 346231 5895523 WT01, 2267(m)
R76 No 348851 5895524 WT07, 3435(m)
R77 No 346397 5895702 WT01, 2493(m)
R78 No 348321 5895798 WT07, 3449(m)
R79 No 349304 5896007 WT07, 4085(m)
R80 No 346374 5896055 WT01, 2817(m)
R81 No 341909 5896089 WT01, 4477(m)
R82 No 346495 5896143 WT01, 2940(m)
R83 No 348831 5896261 WT07, 4076(m)
R84 No 348605 5896979 WT07, 4656(m)
R85 No 345303 5897688 WT01, 4307(m)
R86 No 344847 5897831 WT01, 4490(m)
R87 No 346275 5897925 WT01, 4610(m)
R88 No 345975 5897958 WT01, 4600(m)
R89 No 345271 5898009 WT01, 4629(m)
R90 No 345540 5898038 WT01, 4653(m)
R91 No 344911 5898083 WT01, 4732(m)
R92 No 345968 5898092 WT01, 4733(m)
R93 No 344826 5898092 WT01, 4752(m)
R94 No 344781 5898107 WT01, 4773(m)
R95 No 346319 5898128 WT01, 4817(m)
R96 No 344435 5898187 WT01, 4914(m)
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 18 Appendix C: Photographs of Logger Locations
R20
R42
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 19
R75
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 20 Appendix D: Noise Correlations
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 21
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 22 Appendix E: Predicted Wind Farm Noise and Relevant Criteria
Criteria (dB(A)) Predicted Noise Level (dB(A))
Wind Speed (m/s)
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
R1 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 14 15 17 20 23 24 26 26 26 26
R2 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 14 15 17 20 23 24 26 26 26 26
R3 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 17 19 22 24 26 28 28 28 28
R4 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 13 15 17 19 22 24 26 26 26 26
R5 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 17 20 22 25 26 28 28 28 28
R6 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 17 19 22 24 26 28 28 28 28
R7 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 18 20 22 25 27 29 29 29 29
R8 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 17 20 22 25 26 28 28 28 28
R9 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 18 20 22 25 27 28 29 28 28
R10 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 18 20 22 25 27 29 29 29 29
R11 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 18 20 22 25 26 28 28 28 28
R12 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 18 20 22 25 27 29 29 29 29
R13 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 18 20 22 25 27 28 29 29 28
R14 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 27 29 29 29 29
R15 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 18 20 23 25 27 29 29 29 29
R16 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 28 30 30 30 29
R17 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 18 20 23 26 27 29 29 29 29
R18 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 18 20 23 26 27 29 29 29 29
R19 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 18 20 22 24 27 29 31 31 31 31
R20 40 40 41 41 42 42 43 43 44 45 18 20 22 24 27 28 30 30 30 30
R21 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 28 30 30 30 30
R22 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 19 22 24 27 28 30 30 30 30
R23 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 19 22 24 27 28 30 30 30 30
R24 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 20 22 24 27 29 31 31 31 30
R25 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 20 22 24 27 29 31 31 31 30
R26 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 20 22 24 26 29 30 32 32 32 32
R27 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 20 22 24 26 29 30 32 32 32 32
R28 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 20 22 24 27 28 30 30 30 30
R29 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 28 30 30 30 30
R30 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 19 21 24 27 28 30 30 30 30
R31 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 24 26 28 30 30 30 30
R32 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 28 30 30 30 30
R33 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 20 22 24 27 28 30 30 30 30
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 23
Criteria (dB(A)) Predicted Noise Level (dB(A))
Wind Speed (m/s)
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
R34 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 28 30 30 30 30
R35 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 28 29 30 29 29
R36 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 27 29 30 29 29
R37 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 23 25 27 30 32 34 36 36 36 35
R38 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 18 20 22 25 27 29 29 29 29
R39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 15 16 18 21 23 25 27 27 27 27
R40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 14 16 18 20 23 25 26 27 27 27
R41 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 18 20 22 25 27 29 29 29 29
R42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 27 29 29 29 29
R43 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 27 29 29 29 29
R44 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 28 29 30 30 29
R45 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 18 20 23 25 27 29 29 29 29
R46 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 18 20 22 25 27 29 29 29 29
R47 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 27 29 29 29 29
R48 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 12 14 16 18 21 23 25 25 25 25
R49 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 18 20 23 25 27 29 29 29 29
R50 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 18 21 23 26 27 29 29 29 29
R51 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 18 20 23 25 27 29 29 29 29
R52 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 18 20 23 26 27 29 29 29 29
R53 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 18 20 22 25 27 29 29 29 29
R54 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 13 14 16 19 21 23 25 25 25 25
R55 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 20 22 25 27 29 31 31 31 31
R56 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 17 20 22 25 26 28 28 28 28
R57 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 17 19 22 24 26 28 28 28 28
R58 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 12 14 16 18 21 23 25 25 25 25
R59 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 15 17 19 21 24 26 28 28 28 28
R60 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 17 19 22 24 26 28 28 28 28
R61 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 17 19 22 24 26 28 28 28 28
R62 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 21 23 25 27 30 31 33 33 33 33
R63 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 20 22 24 27 29 30 31 30 30
R64 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 14 16 18 20 23 25 27 27 27 27
R65 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 14 15 17 20 22 24 26 26 26 26
R66 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 20 22 24 27 28 30 30 30 30
R67 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 19 21 24 27 28 30 30 30 30
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 24
Criteria (dB(A)) Predicted Noise Level (dB(A))
Wind Speed (m/s)
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
R68 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 18 20 23 25 27 29 29 29 29
R69 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 13 15 17 19 22 24 26 26 26 26
R70 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 26 28 30 32 35 36 38 38 38 38
R71 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 25 26 28 31 34 35 37 37 37 37
R72 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 18 20 23 25 27 29 29 29 29
R73 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 14 15 17 20 22 24 26 26 26 26
R74 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 19 21 23 26 27 29 29 29 29
R75 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 43 44 21 22 24 27 29 31 33 33 33 32
R76 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 20 22 24 27 28 30 30 30 30
R77 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 21 22 25 27 30 31 33 33 33 33
R78 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 18 19 21 24 26 28 30 30 30 30
R79 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 16 18 20 22 25 27 28 29 28 28
R80 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 20 21 23 26 29 30 32 32 32 32
R81 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 15 16 18 21 24 25 27 27 27 27
R82 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 19 20 22 25 27 29 31 31 31 31
R83 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 17 18 20 22 25 27 29 29 29 29
R84 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 15 17 19 21 24 26 28 28 28 28
R85 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 15 17 19 21 24 26 28 28 28 28
R86 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 15 16 19 21 24 25 27 27 27 27
R87 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 15 16 18 21 24 25 27 27 27 27
R88 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 15 16 18 21 23 25 27 27 27 27
R89 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 15 16 18 21 23 25 27 27 27 27
R90 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 15 16 18 21 23 25 27 27 27 27
R91 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 14 16 18 20 23 25 27 27 27 27
R92 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 14 16 18 20 23 25 27 27 27 27
R93 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 14 16 18 20 23 25 27 27 27 27
R94 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 14 16 18 20 23 25 27 27 27 27
R95 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 14 16 18 20 23 25 27 27 27 27
R96 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 41 14 16 18 20 23 25 26 27 27 27
Cherry Tree Wind Farm Environmental Noise Assessment S3768C3 18th April 2012
Page 25 Appendix F: Noise Contour