As a Member of the European Union, SES Regulations are binding and directly app/icable to the SlovakRepublic.

Further to Article 12 of the Framework Regulation (EC) No 54912004 and to the formalised request of theCommission to EUROCONTROL dated 31 July 2008, Chapter 2 of SK LCIP 2009-2013 fulfils the SlovakRepublic's obligation to report to the European Commission on SES implementation for the period from1st July 2007 till 31st December 2008.

Director GeneralGeneral Directorate of Civil Aviationand Water Transport

Chapter 2 - Single European Sky Annual Report

2.1 NSA Establishment & ResponsibilitiesOne NSA has been established in the Slovak Republic, as follows:

Name of the NSA: MOT&CMSK

legal Basis: Civil Aviation Act

Separation from ANSP: Institutional

Relationship with CAAlDGCA: 1) The CM IDGCA is the nominated NSA, under the structure of MaT2) CM SK is the nominated NSA, independent body from CAAlDGCA with

main task to perform oversight in civil aviation

Specific inspections & surveys Nonedelegated (or intended to be)to Recognised Organisations

Changes since previous No changesAnnual Report (AR):

Areas of Responsibility CIV Mil Additional Information(as per art. 2.1 (SP-R):

ATS y N/ACNS y N/AAIS Y N/A

AFIS Y N/AMET Y N/A

Areas of Responsibility CIV Mil Additional Information Notified Date of(as per other art.lreg.): to the EC correspondence

ATCO licensing Y N/A Transposed via ESARR 5 Y 21.05.2008

Engineering & Tech. Staff y N/A N

Access ANSPs accounts Y N/A N

Economic oversight Y N/A N

Interoperability Y N/A N

Changes since No changes since previous report.previous AR: Main activities undertaken by the NSA (CM SK) in this past year was performing the

oversight and preparation of new amendment to aviation act.

Additional NSA (CM SK) is still facing lack of personnel and adequate financing to perform their duties.information:

2.2.1 Certification

AII certified ANSPs in the Slovak Republic are presented below

Name of the ANSP Services for which it has been Certified Date of Valid until Derogation ConditionsCertif. Granted Attached

ATS AFIS AIS CNS MET

Letové prevádzkové Y Y Y Y N 12/12/06 Unlimited N Y(*)služby Slovenskejrepubliky(LPS SR)

Slovak N N N N Y 12/12/06 Unlimited N Y(*)HydrometeorologicalInstitute (SH MU) i

(*)Yes, standard conditions in the certificate

No derogations have been granted to any of the above listed ANSP.

Changes since I No changes.previous AR: --------------------------------

2.2.2 Designation

The status of designation of ATS and MET Providers in the Slovak Republic is presented below:

State authority responsible for Designation DGCA MaT/MOD

Type of Name of the Service Provider / Airspace under its Date of Valid until Conditions

Service responsibility Desig. attached

ATS Letové prevádzkové služby Slovenskej Republiky 12/12/06 Unlimited Y(LPS SR)

MET Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute (SH MU) 12/12/06 Unlimited Y

The State/ANSP received an ofter of services from Nanother certified ANSP having its principal place ofoperation in another Member State:

Changes since I No changesprevious AR:

2.2.3 Arrangements for Cross-Border ANS provision

The following two tables present the cross-border provision of Air Navigation Services involving theSlovak Republic, both for ATS and, separately for other ANS as foreseen in particular by the ServiceProvision Regulation in Preamble (13).

ATS Services Area(s) Agreement with the State concerned on the supervision of theprovided TO: ATSP(s):

HUNGARY TMA 2 Košice Y Memorandum

ATS Services Area(s) Agreement with the State concerned on the supervision of theprovided FROM: ATSP(s):

HUNGARY RUTOL Box Y Memorandum

UKRAINE LZR 49,50 Y Intergovernmental Agreement

Changes since No changesprevious AR:

I N

Name of the NSA: I CMSK

The NSA has produced an Inspection Programme (as per Art. 7 of SP-IR-CR): I y

Further to the certification of the ANSPs, the NSA has verified compliance with the Common Requirementsin the following areas since the last Annual Report:

Organisational Structure and Management Y Met service provider ( SHMU)

Safety Management System y LPS SR

Operation Manuals Y LPS SR,SHMU

Security Management System y LPS SR, SHMU

Policies for Recruitment and Training of Y LPS SRPersonnel

Financial Audits N

Liability and Insurance Cover N As above

Contingency Plans Y LPS SR,SHMU

Set up of a Quality Management System N As above

Production of a Business Plan and an Annual N As abovePlan (including demonstration of economicand financial capacity):

Provision of an Annual Report: Y LPS SR 1 SHMUIhttp://www.rl p.sk/docs/vyrsprava200 7sk. pdfhttp://www.shmu.sk/FileNS plus prilohy.pdf ,

The State has implemented a formal consultation mechanism for the involvement of stakeholders in I ySES implementation:

Since the last Annual Report, the following stakeholders have been consulted on the following topics:

ANSPs Y Formal consultation process based on New amendment of aviation actgovernmental directive regarding developing of Amendment 216/2008legal acts, CM SK internal directive forconsultation process

Airports Y Same as above Same as above

Airspace Users Y Same as above Same as aboveRepresentative

Orgs.

Professional staff Y Same as above Same as aboverepresentative

bodies

Manufacturing Y Same as above Same as aboveindustry

,

Military Y Same as above Same as above

Other y Same as above Same as above

Transposition of SP-D-ATCO y ESARR 5, ATM SEVICES' PERSONNELl MOTDirective 21/2005 from 22. September 2005, latestamendment from 28. January 2008

Communication to the EC of the national Y 21.5.20081 Notification form 1Celex 32006L0023provisions enforced to comply with SP-D-ATCO

Certified ATCO training providers (as per Art Y ZILlNA University (Basie training only)10): LPS SR (Full range of training)

Provisions of Art 8 on 'Linguistic Y ESARR 5 ( Language proficiency)Requirements' implemented:

Aside from the two articles specified above,progress of implementation of SP-D-ATCO:

Changes since Certification of LPS SR as certified ATCO training providerprevious AR:

Full implementation of the Airspace 2012 FAB Central EUROPERegulation in the State foreseen for:

Application of the airspace regulation to N -airspace under the responsibility of the IState outside the ICAO EUR or AFI regions: I

Current division flight level between upper and lower airspace: I FL245

Intention to apply division flight level 285 I N I AII en-routes in upper area start at FL245

The State has implemented airspace classification and access of flights operated under VFR above YFL 195:

The State has introduced additional rules with respect to access or operation of VFR flights above NFL 195:

There have been requests for TSA(s) (or equivalent) for GAT flying Between FL 195 and FL 280 Yunder VFR, as encompassed within the rules governing access for

FL 285 and above YGAT VFR flights within this airspace:

Chang,es since I No changesprevlous AR: ..

FAB initiative: FAB Central Europe States involved: AT - AustriaBA - Bosnia and Herzegovina

Launched in: April 2007 CZ - Czech RepublicHR - CroatiaHU - HungarySI - SloveniaSK - Slovakia

Feasibility: Start: 1 April 2007 End: I March 2008 Progress: lin progress, on time.

The FAB CE Feasibility Study is a joint project of States, ANSPs and EUROCONTROL as the facilitator andproject manager of the Study.

FAB CE Feasibility Study has 6 Working Groups - Operational, Technical, Financial, Human Resources,Institutional/Legal/Regulatory and Safety.

The main deliverables are Master Plan, Cost Benefit Analysis and Safety Case. The CEA TS Coordination Group(CCG) will take decision on the basis of the feasibility study deliverables at the end of March 2008.

Definition: Start:12008 End: 12009 Progress: I In progress, on time.

ImplementationPhase 1:

There is a formal agreement between the States involved on the supervision of the ANSP(s) Nproviding services in this FAB:

Not defined yet

There is an agreement in principie concerning the joint designation of the ATSPs within the FAB: N

Not defined yet

Changes since previous No changesAnnual Report (AR):

Additional information: -

Name of the NSA: I MOT&CAASK

The NSA has defined and allocated tasks and Yresponsibilities in accordance with the IO-R:

The NSA has developed Process Descriptions defining the supervision of compliance as defined in

IY

the IO-R:

These: - Address the definition of systems subject N List of systems as provided in ANNEX I isto verification according to ANNEX l: applicable.

- Specify the scope of the verification of the Ymaterial provided by the ANSP:

- Define how to proceed in case of Yconformity:

- Define how to proceed in case of non- Yconformity:

- Define 'templates' (e.g. for the declaration): N Harmonisation within EU is expected

2.8.3 Verification of Compliance

This section covers the status of compliance of the State with regard s to the IO-R and the associatedImplementing Rules in place.

Number of EC Declarations of verifications of systems put into service after the 20th of October2005 issued until 31.12.2008:

ANSP: LPS SR System <AFTN/CIDIN Type of 4 DecI. 04/04/08Concerned SWITCH system date

ANSP: LPS SR System ILS RWY 31 Type of 5 DecI. 08/10/07Concerned system date

ANSP: LPS SR System LETVIS RDP Type of 6 DecI. 03/0608Concerned Košice system date

ANSP: SHMU System IMS4 Košice Type of 8 DecI. 04/0608

Concerned system date

ANSP: SH MU System IMS4 Poprad Type of 8 DecI. 04/0608

Concerned svstem date

Number of EC Declarations of conformity or suitability for use of constituents 1 issued until31.12.2008:

Manufacturer THALES ATM GmbH Constituent ILS-LOC 411 DecI. 03/09/07Concerned date

Manufacturer THALES ATM GmbH Constituent ILS-GS 412 I DecI. 03/09/07Concerned date

Manufacturer THALES ATM GmbH Constituent Marker 413 DecI. 03/09/07Concerned date

Manufacturer THALES ATM GmbH Constituent RCSU 443 DecI. 03/09/07Concerned date

Manufacturer ALES a.s. Constituent LETVS RDP/2008 DecI. 10/03/08Concerned date

Manufacturer MicroStep-MIS s.r.o. Constituent IMS4 DecI. 6/03/07Concerned date

The NSA(s) ascertained non-compliance cases from the above EC Declarations, leading to Nsafeguard measures.

Has the ANSP(s) implemented the processes related to Y LPS SR.notification and initial coordination between ACCs incompliance with this Regulation?

Has the ANSP(s) implemented any of the following processes between ATC units other than ACCs incompliance with this Regulation?

Notification Y

Initial Coordination y

Revision of Coordination N System is capable, but no operational need has been identified.

Abrogation of Coordination N No operational need has been identified.

Basic Flight Data N No operational need has been identified.

Change to Basic Flight Data N Related to Basic Flight Data implementation.

Has the ANSP(s) implemented any of the following optional processes in compliance with this Regulation?

Pre-Departure notification and Ncoordination

Change of frequency N

Manual assumption of COM Nprocesses

Has the ANSP(s) implemented the civil-military flight data Y Transmission of flight information.processes between their systems and these of controllingmilitary units?

Has the ANSP used the "EUROCONTROL Specification for YOn-Line Data Interchange (OLDl)" as means to achievecompliance with the Regulation?

1Note: As defined in Article 2.19 (F-R), 'constituents' means tangible objects such as hardware and intangible objects such as software upon

which the interoperability of the EATMN depends. These shall be determined by IRs for interoperability, as per Art. 3.c and Annex III (IO-R).

LCIP2DD9-2D13 Slovak Republic Chapter 2-6 Re/eased Issue

Has the ANSP used the "EUROCONTROL Specification for N OLDI is used.ATS Data Exchange Presentation (ADEXP)" as means toachieve compliance with the Regulation?

Has the ANSP(s) implemented the flight message transfer N It will be applied from 1st January 2009protocol in compliance with this Regulation? for new systems.

Has the ANSP used the "EUROCONTROL Specification for Y "EUROCONTROL Specification for thethe Flight Message Transfer Protocol" as means to achieve Flight Message Transfer Protocol" willcompliance with the Regulation? be used as means to achieve

compliance with the Regulation

Has the NSA verified the compliance of the ANSP(s) with this Regulation? I N

Has the State taken any measures to ensure the compliance N The compliance with this Regulation willof the Operators with this Regulation? be verified after 1st January 2009

Has the State taken any measures to ensure the compliance N I

of the IFPS with this Regulation? IHas the ANSP used the "EUROCONTROL Specification for ythe Initial Flight Plan" as means to achieve compliance withthe Regulation?

Has the ANSP used the "EUROCONTROL Specification for IN

ATS Data Exchange Presentation (ADEXP)" as means toachieve compliance with the Regulation?

Is the ANSP(s) in compliance with this Regulation? Y LPS SR

Has the State communicated to the EC any exceptional Ncircumstances preventing ANSPs to comply with Art. 3.3?

Has the State communicated to the EC the lists of State Naircraft that will not be equipped with 8.33 kHz radios, inorder to benefit from the transitional arrangements?

Has the State taken any measures to ensure the compliance Y Requirements for carriage of 8.33kHzof the Operators with this Regulation? radios are included in AIP SR.

Has the State ascertained non-compliances with this N

Iregulation leading to corrective measures?

En-route Charging Zone(s) Nr Description

Slovakia 1 Bratislava Flight Information Region

Terminal Charging Zone(s) Nr Description

N/A No airport above 50.000 movements' threshold.

Decision by the State to: Additional Information Notified to Date ofthe EC corresponden

ce

Defer the application of Articles N/A No airport above 50.000 movements' Y 27 March 20089 and 11 to15 for terminal threshold.

Exempt ANS provided at Y AII airports: Y 27 March 2008Airports with less than 50.000 M.R. Štefánik Bratislava; Košice;

Commercial Movements per yearPoprad-Tatry, Sliač, Piešťany, Žilinafrom the application of the

Regulation

Exempt ANS provided at N N/A N/A N/AAirports with less than 150.000

Commercial Movements per year Publication N/Afrom the application of Art. 11 of final

and 13 of the Regulation assessment

Changes since I Added charges for NSA cost.previous AR:

Description of the review / appeal procedure for the decisions taken pursuant to the Charging Regulation

Not defined yet

Enforcement measures applied for the collection of air navigation charges

Not defined yet