Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative...

49
Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009 Copyright Kaplan University 2009

Transcript of Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative...

Page 1: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Chapter 10Copyright Kaplan University 2009Copyright Kaplan University 2009

Page 2: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

The drawing of conclusions by the use

of quantitative or qualitative information

Page 3: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.
Page 4: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Inductive Finding valid

answers from examination of the data

Deductive Finding valid

answers using mathematic applications against the data

Page 5: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Inductive Studying

relationship between two types of data

Ex: The rate of hypertension among smokers

Deductive Proving or

disproving of a hypothesis

Ex: Smoking causes high blood pressure

Page 6: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

An equation may be written using the same formula and have different applications in math or statistics

Consider the equation: y = mx + b Mathematically: Formula for defining a

straight line in geometry Statistically: Formula for simple regression

analysis

Page 7: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Null Hypothesis States there is no

difference between the means of the two compared groups being studied

Alternative Hypothesis States that there is

a true difference between the means of the two compared groups being studied

Page 8: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

This list simplifies the steps to testing a null hypothesis for Statistical Significance

Page 9: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Generally p (false positive) = .05 or 5% Leads to a 95% confidence interval of

arriving at the right hypothesis

Page 10: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Obtain a “p” value for the data Example:

Standard Deviation Confidence Intervals Mean, Mode and Median Student t-test (1 or 2 tailed)

Compare the p values (answers) to the alpha level

Does this answer satisfy the null or alternative hypothesis?

Page 11: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

H0: Men who eat pizza three times a week will gain ten pounds over the three week period (Null Hypothesis)

H1: Men who eat pizza three times a week will not gain ten pounds over the three week period (Alternative Hypothesis)

Page 12: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Subjects PRE Wt POST WT Difference 1 128 138 10 2 100 110 10 3 110 120 10 4 145 41 -4 5 201 215 4 6 200 201 1 7 198 196 -2 8 157 157 0 9 300 289 -11 10 194 195 1 Mean 173 176

Page 13: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Do you accept or reject the null hypothesis

Do you accept or reject the alternative hypothesis

Page 14: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.
Page 15: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Most commonly used statistical test in medicine

Compares means of the variables of two research samples (groups)

May be used in research groups which differ i.e. Male/Female; dogs/cats

May be 1 or 2 tailed (which affects interpretation)

Page 16: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

In regards to the “t” test and the use of “p” If “t” is large (means of samples) then “p” is

small (percentage of error) and the difference is regarded as real (i.e. believable)

If “p” is large (larger than 5%) then the difference is not real (unrealistic or unbelievable)

Page 17: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

INTRODUCTION TO PREVENTATIVE MEDICINE

Page 18: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Promotes general health Prevention of disease

Application of epidemiological concepts Aid in prevention Aid in promotion

Page 19: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

A state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, not merely the absence of disease or infirmity

-World Health Organization

Page 20: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Good Known as Eustress

Exercise Infant stimulation

Bad Known as distress

Mal-adaption Environmental

Page 21: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Mortality Data Life Expectancy Quality of Adjusted Life Years (QALY)

Page 22: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Latent: Also known as: “hidden” Offers a window of opportunity for early

detection Symptomatic:

Produces clinical manifestations that are measurable

Tertiary: Disease progression in the absence of

intervention

Page 23: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Primary: Eliminate the cause of disease Example: Vaccinations

Secondary: Interrupt the disease process prior to

symptoms occuring Example: Medication or Surgical intervention

Tertiary: Limiting physical and social consequences of

symptomatic disease Example: Rehabilitation/therapy

Page 24: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.
Page 25: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Nutritional Factors – How important is this factor?

Page 26: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.
Page 27: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

How can nutritional issues be addressed within the scope of preventive medicine.

Page 28: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

What is the difference between Environmental and Occupational health

promotion?

Page 29: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Explore routes of exposure to environmental hazards. How dangerous

are these?What are some sources?

Page 30: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Behavioral factors: How do we promote prevention here. Someone cite an example and let us discuss briefly?

Page 31: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

HS 310: Epidemiology and StatisticsCopyright Kaplan University 2009

Page 32: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Sample Size: Used to determine time and amount of

funding needed for research Directly affects presence of statistical

significance Defines the realism of the proposed research

Page 33: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Need for paired data Will there be large/small variance in

variables of interest? Consideration of Beta and/or Alpha Errors Acceptance of 95% Confidence

Interval/5% Error 1 sided or 2-sided t-test Degree of difference desired

Page 34: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Calculation of Paired t-test w/Alpha Error onlyFormula: N = (zx)2 . (s)2

(d)2

Plug in the #:N = (1.96)2 . (15) 2

(10) 2

Work from Center: N = (3.84) (225)100

Can you solve from here, what is the answer?

Page 35: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

8.64 = “9”

Page 36: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Consider the differences in the equationN = (zx)2 . 2 .(s)2

(d)2

Again work from center: N = (1.96)2 . (2) . (15)2

(10)2 Can you solve for “N”

Page 37: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

17.28 or 18

Page 38: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Utilizing Page 200 again, Box 12-2 for the numbersN = (zx + zb) 2 . (2) . (s)2

(d) 2

N = (1.96 + 0.84) 2 . (2) . (15) 2

(10) 2

Solve for “N”

Page 39: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

35.28 (nope)70.56 (NOPE)

72(remember you have to have the same

number in both categories so even though 70.56 is numerically correct you cannot divide 71 into 2 even groups.)

Also 36(2) = 72

Page 40: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

A method of assigning subjects to the control or experimental group in such a way that the choice is in no way influenced. Example of ways to randomize:

Can you think of some?

Page 41: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Simple Random Allocation Use of random

numbers table

Randomization into groups of “2” Used to get 2

groups with same number of participants

Page 42: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Systematic Allocation Assign 1st person

to group 1, second person to group 2 and so on.

Stratified Allocation Used in clinical

research whereas patients are assigned to certain groups according to severity of their condition

Page 43: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Independence Rule: One probability is not influenced by the outcome of another probability

Product Rule: determination that the probability of two things being true

Addition Rule: Determination that the probability of one thing being true under all possibilities.

Page 44: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Multivariable Statistics Involves more than one variable These variables are called “multivariable

models”

Page 45: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Determination of interactions between variables

To develop prediction models in clinical settings

Adjust inter-group differences Useful in propensity matching and

scoring

Page 46: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

ANOVA – Analysis of Variance Definition: Use to analyze results of

experimental studies or categorical independent variables

Two types: 1-way ANOVA (aka F-Test) Comparison of more than two means

simultaneously Involves estimating the independent variance in

one of two ways

Page 47: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

Type I = Between groups Type II = within groups

N-way ANOVA Aka 2-way ANOVA Testing of two or more independent variables

Page 48: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.

ANCOVA: Analysis of Covariable Definition: Method of analyzing continuous

dependent variables MLR: Multiple Linear Regression

Definition: Method of analyzing dependent variables and all independent variables which are continous

Most common is the “stepwise linear regression”

Not used much in clinical medicine

Page 49: Chapter 10 Copyright Kaplan University 2009. The drawing of conclusions by the use of quantitative or qualitative information.