PRESENTATION BY:MARYAM MUSTAFA MEMONBBA (FALL 2011)FROM INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS

ADMINISTRATION, KARACHI, PAKISTANTOPIC: LOSS OH HUMAN AS AN IDENTITY

DUE TO LACK OF MORAL FRAMEWORK.

CAN YOU SEE! THERE IS SOMETHING COMMON IN ALL THESE PICTURES…

WHAT IS IT?THE COMMON THING HERE IS “EXCESS OF DATA”

OR “DATA PILING”.

POWER IS FELT DUE TO EXCESSIVE DATA BUT THE QUESTION IS WHAT TO DO WITH THE POWER?

SO WE FACE THIS PILING DATA ISSUE DUE TO TECHNOLOGY/ SIMULATION BUT THEN TO SOLVE IT WE AGAIN GO FOR NEW TECHNOLOGIES.

SO WHERE ARE WE WRONG THEN?• WE HAVE POWER BUT WE DON’T KNOW WHERE AND

HOW TO USE IT. SO WE NEED A “MORAL SYSTEM” OR “MORAL FRAMEWORK”. DUE TO THE EXCESSIVE PILING OF DATA, LET’S WORD IT AS “AUTOMATED COMPARTMENTALIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE” TILL THE NEXT DECADE, THE SUBJECT “HUMAN” WILL BE LOST IN A TECHNOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK.

• FACT IS ALL OF US ARE CONDITIONED BY PARENTS THAT ‘THIS IS RIGHT’ OR ‘THIS IS WRONG’. BUT HOW DO WE COME TO KNOW THAT ON OUR OWN? THAT IS THROUGH CONSTRUCTIVE PARALLELISM BETWEEN ETHICS AND SCIENCE.

HOWEVER IN THIS TECHNOLOGY DRIVEN WORKPLACE MORALS AND ETHICS ARE THOUGHT TO BE TRADITIONAL AND HINDRANCE SO HERE IS AN IDEAL PROPOSAL AS TO HOW YOU COULD IMPLEMENT MORAL FRAMEWORK ALONG WITH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY…

The number is objective. It has its truth that any other number added to it would give the perfect objective parallel truth as well.

THE SAME WAY!SAY WHEN YOU INVEST 1 MILLION YOU GO FOR AN OPPORTUNITY

WHERE PLEASURE IS MAXIMIZED AND PAIN IS REDUCED. BUT YOU ARE REDUCING THE PAIN FOR YOUR SELF YOU ARE CERTAINLY NOT EVALUATING THE OBJECTIVE TRUTH BEHIND THE SUBJECT. YOU MUST BE ENHANCING THE PAIN OF OTHER HUMANS WHILE REDUCING YOUR PAIN. THIS IS THE EXACT PHILOSOPHY UNDER ONE STATE WAGING WAR AGAINST OTHER, TESTS OF NUCLEAR BOMBARDMENT, HEAVY LOSSES DUE TO INVESTMENTS AND EVERY OTHER THING IN SOCIETY.

NOW WHAT TO DO!START THINKING FOR EVERY SINGLE ACT OF YOUR LIFE AS TO WHY

YOU REACHED TO THAT PARTICULAR CONCLUSION AND ALWAYS GO FOR SECONDARY OPINIONS. BECAUSE ON BASIS OF COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS HUMANS COME ACROSS THE REAL MORAL OBJECTIVE BEHIND AN ACT.

THIS WAY HUMAN RELATIONS ARE BUILD UP WITH SECONDARY CONTRACTS. YOU USED A MACHINE IN YOUR FACTORY. JUST ASK YOURSELF DID I DO ANY HARM? IS IT RIGHT? DID I WASTE SOMETHING? DID SOMEONE GET HURT WHILE PROCESSING? WHEN YOU REACH YOUR DECISION GO FOR OPINION OF NEXT PERSON. THIS WAY YOU WILL HAVE THE REALITY OF AN ACTION THAT WHETHER THE ACT IS MORALLY CORRECT OR NOT.

THIS MAKES MORAL FRAMEWORK SIMPLE MATH. JUST START THINKING ADD 2 AND 2 AND WHEN THE WHOLE WORLD DOES SO THE HUMAN AS A “SUBJECT” WILL NEVER DISAPPEAR DUE TO A CYCLICAL MORAL FRAMEWORK.

SO THIS IS DIASTER OF THE UPCOMING CENTURY! HOW RIGHT CAN THIS BE!

YOUR TIME TO DECIDE! IF YOU THINK THIS REALITY IS A PART OF MORAL SYSTEM THEN WHAT IS THE SUBJECTIVE TRUTH BEHIND THIS??

ECONOMIST

SCIENTIST