Ch13
-
Upload
stanbridge -
Category
Documents
-
view
43 -
download
1
Transcript of Ch13
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Chapter 13
Discussion
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
• Answers the question posed in the Introduction
• Also explains:
o How the results support the answer
o How the answer fits in with existing knowledge
o Theoretical implications or practical applications
Function of the Discussion
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
• Provide the answer to the question • State and interpret key findings
• State the novelty and significance/importance
• Indicate possible next steps
• Provide other relevant results and hypotheses
• Compare and contrast your findings with others
• Can mention possible errors, unexpected findings, or limitations
Content of the Discussion
Summarize and generalize
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
• Consider readers
• Basic scientists and clinicians need to understand each other
• Provide clinical implications
• Discuss scientific significance
• Take a stand—convey confidence and authority
Audience and Tone in the Discussion
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Pyramid structure: Specific to general
- The answer - Your interpretation of the answer - Supporting evidence
- Comparisons/Contrast with previous studies - Unexpected findings and limitations - Hypotheses or models
- Summary and significance
First Paragraph
Middle paragraphs
Last paragraph
Organization of the Discussion
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
The verb tense depends on the subject of the sentence
Signal Verb Tense
This study shows that Present
Our results indicate that Present
In this study, we provide evidence that
Present
In this study, we have shown that Present perfect
In this study, we have found that Present perfect
In this study, we found that Past
Signal of the Answer
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
State the answer/interpret key findings
• Answer ≠ ResultsAnswer = Generalization based on the results
Support the answer
• State the relevant results after stating the answer
• Cite a figure or a table if necessary
• Readers will not memorize results or search for them
First Paragraph
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Transition Type
“In our experiments” Transition phrase
“The evidence is that” Transition clause
“Evidence that (answer) is that” Transition clause
“We found that”* Transition clause
“(Answer) has been demonstrated in two ways.”
Topic sentence
*Only if “We found that” is not used to signal the answer.
Transitions from the Answer to the Results
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Example
Our findings emphasize the need to continue to promote personal protection measures to reduce the risk of Lyme disease infection. We have identified three reasonable personal measures that may be protective against Lyme disease when practiced: tick checks, bathing, and insect repellents. Performing tick checks within 36 hrs after spending time in the yard may reduce one’s risk by as much as 46%. In addition, bathing may reduce one’s risk by up to 57%, and the use of insect repellent may be protective against the disease up to 75%.
AnswerAnswer
Supporting evidenceSupporting evidence
Sample Discussion First Paragraph
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Do not begin the Discussion with:
• A second introduction
• A summary of the Results
• Secondary information
How Not to Begin the Discussion
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
• Organize the topics: most to least important
• Compare and contrast results
• Explain discrepancies, unexpected findings, and
limitations
• Provide generalizations (models) where possible
Middle Paragraphs
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
• Use topic sentences
• Repeat key terms
• Use Transitions- Stronger transitions in later paragraphs
• Consider word location
Continuity in the Discussion
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Mention any results that do not support your answer
Explain discrepancies with other’s work
Example
Apparent discrepancies between our values and those of earlier studies may be due to differences in study design. In our study, oxygen was excluded in all cases. Moreover, aluminum was added. Earlier studies that reported lower reaction rates, differed from this study design in one of two ways: No care was taken to exclude oxygen, or a mixture of different metal alloys was added.
Conflicting Results
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Discuss unexpected findings
•State that the finding was unexpected (or surprising)
•Explain unexpected findings as best you can
•Unexpected findings may be important
Example To our surprise we discovered that the bindin fusion
protein was being cleaved during isolation and purification. The proteolysis is remarkably efficient since only small amounts of the unprocessed form remain (Fig. 2, lane 3).
Unexpected Findings
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Provide a conclusion
•Restate the answer(s) to the question(s)
•Indicate the importance of the work
•Discuss theoretical and possible practical implications
Last Paragraph
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Phrase conclusions concisely and with great care
Signal the end and signal the answer
Examples
• “In summary, we have shown that . . .”
• “In conclusion, this study shows that . . .”
The Conclusion
Answer at the end of the Discussion = Answer at the beginning
Answer at the end of the Discussion = Answer at the beginning
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Level of Certainty
Indicate importance by stating
Importance of Work
Ending Example
Application . . . can be used for . . .
Advice X should be used to . . .
Suggestion Our results imply . . .
Proposition We hypothesize that . . .
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Example Application
In summary, our work reveals the functional interactions involved in the binding of antibiotics to the peptidyl transferase cavity of the bacterial ribosome. None of the antibiotics examined show any direct interaction with ribosomal proteins. Chloramphenicol targets mainly the A site, where it interferes directly with substrate binding. Clindamycin interferes with the A site and P site substrate binding and physically hinders the path of the growing peptide chain. Macrolides bind at the entrance to the tunnel where they sterically block the progression of the nascent chain. The structural model of the peptidyl transferase center in complex with the examined antibiotics can not only enable a rational approach for antibiotic development and therapy strategies but can also be used to identify new target sites on the eubacterial ribosome.
Sample Conclusion
AnswerAnswer
Key findings
Key findings
SignificanceSignificance
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Tense in the Discussion
• Past tense for results
• Present tense for general statements and
conclusions
• Be specific about necessary future studies
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Signals in the DiscussionAnswer Key findings Summary Significance
In this study, we have shown . . .
In our experiments . . .
In summary, . . . Our findings can/will serve to . . .
In this study, we found that . . .
. . . can be attributed to . . .
In conclusion, . . . Finally, . . .
. . . can be used . . .
Our study shows that . . .
We found that . . .
To summarize our results, . . .
Y should be used for . . .
Our findings demonstrate that . . .
Our data show that . . . was demonstrated by . . .
We conclude that . . .
Taken together, . . .
Y indicates that X may . . . These findings imply that X may . . .
This paper describes . . .
Overall, . . . . . . we hypothesize that . . .
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Signals in the Discussion
Comparisons Conflicting Results
Limitations Unexpected Findings
Proposed Hypothesis
. . . consistent with . . . (ref.)
Similar to . . . (ref.)
. . . has also been observed by . . . (ref.)
X has been demonstrated . . . (ref.)
However, other studies found that . . . (ref.)
. . . is controversial . . . (ref.)
. . . does not agree with (ref.)
. . . has also been reported… (ref.)
. . . was not possible . . .
. . . could not be measured . . .
. . . was limited by . . .
Further observations are needed to . . .
Surprisingly, . . .
To our surprise . . .
. . . was not expected.
Our results lead to the conclusion that . . .
From these data we hypothesize that . . .
We propose the following new principle . . .
ref. = reference
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
• The Results and Discussion sections are sometimes combined
• Advantageous for certain papers
• The results are discussed as they are presented
An Alternative: Results and Discussion
Scientific Writing and Communication, 2e Angelika H. Hofmann Copyright © 2014 by Oxford University Press
Common Problems of the Discussion
• The answer/interpretation is not provided in the first paragraph
• The importance/significance of the study is not clear
• Inclusion of irrelevant or peripheral information
• Results are repeated or summarized in the Discussion