Causes of and a Solution to Global Warming
description
Transcript of Causes of and a Solution to Global Warming
Causes of and a Solution to Global Warming
Mark Z. JacobsonAtmosphere/Energy Program
Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering
Stanford University
Intensive English and Academic Orientation Program
Stanford University, July 24, 2007
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Causes of Global Warming
Temperature Change Since 1750 (
o C)
Green-housegases
Fossil-fuelsoot
particles
Urbanheat
island
Coolingparticles
Netobserved
globalwarming
M.Z. Jacobson
Fractal Soot Agglomerates (Arrows) Coated by Ammonium
Sulfate
Pósfai et al. (1999)
10-yr Modeled Temperature Differences
w-w/o AGHG+AAP+US w-w/o AGHG
w-w/o ff. soot
w-w/o AAP
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Modeled v. Measured Temperature Diffs.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.Measured 1930 to 2005(Brohan et al.)
Modeled 1750 to 2005(simulation not complete)Many cool areas will warm in 5-10 simulation years
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
Cooling (K) after eliminating anth. emiss.
Year
f.f. BC+OM
CO2(50y)
CH4(10y)
CO2(95y)
CO2(30y)
Global Temperature Changes Due to Eliminating Anthropogenic CO2, CH4, f.f. BC+OM Emission
Cooling (K) after eliminating
anthropogenic emission
Causal Effect of CO2 on Mortality
Global-regional nested simulations demonstrate that CO2 alone increases temperature, water vapor, ozone, and PM
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
U.S. ozone deaths/yr per 1 K +500 (190-575)U.S. PM2.5 death/yr per 1 K +640 (160-1280)U.S. Total deaths/yr per 1K +1140 (350-1855)
World Total deaths/yr per 1K +24,000 (7200-37,000)
Temperature Water vapor Ozone
-1 0 1
200400600800
1000
-1 0 1
a.ii) ( )Temperature K
( )Pressure hPaData
Model
Global Power Demand and Clean Renewable Supply
TWGlobal overall power demand
9.4-13.6
Potential renewable availability
Solar over land 1700Land-wind at 80 m and > 6.9
m/s 72a, 80b
Geothermal 9.5b
Hydroelectric 6.5b
Wave 5b
Tidal 3.7b
aArcher and Jacobson, 2005; bStacey and Davis, 2006
Installed Wind Capacity Worldwide
Country 2005 (MW) 2006 (MW) Germany 18,428
20,261Spain 10,027 11,615U.S. 9,149 11,603India 4,430 6,270Denmark 3,122 3,136
World 59,084 74,223(900 offshore)
Individual turbine ≈ 0.4 MW--> ≈ 150,000
turbines
Sources of U.S. CO2
Coalelectricity(30.4%)
Oilelectricity
(1.8%)
Natural gaselectricity
(7.3%)
Other(34.7%)
Onroadvehicles(25.8%)
2005 total6270 MT-CO
2
M.Z. Jacobson
Thousands of 5 MW Wind TurbinesNeeded to Displace 100% U.S. CO
2
Coalelectricity(120-160)
Oil electricity(7-10)
Natural gaselectricity(45-60)
Other(131-188)
Onroadvehicles(battery)(71-122)
Total (2005)374-540
M.Z. Jacobson
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Percent Decrease in Total U.S. Carbon DioxideUpon Replacing 100% of Onroad Vehicles
Ignoring land constraintsWith land constraints
Percent reduction in total U.S. CO
2 emissions
-23.4Solarfor
batteries
-25.5Wind
forhydrogen
fuelcells
-25.5Wind
forbatteries
-13.6Cellu-losic
ethanol
-0.62Corn
ethanol
-4
-0.19 Replacing 30% of vehicles
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
1 104
1.2 104
1.4 104
Future U.S. Deaths Per YearFrom Onroad Vehicle Emissions
U.S. Deaths per Year
Windfor
batteries
Cornethanol
Cellu-losic
ethanol
Solarfor
batteries
Windfor
hydrogenfuelcells
0 0
10,200
0
10,200
M.Z. Jacobson
10,000
Gas/diesel
Area to Power 100% of U.S. Onroad Vehicles
Map: www.fotw.net
Corn ethanol
Cellulosic ethanol
Wind-batteryturbine spacing
Solar-batteryWind-battery
ground contact
Archer and Jacobson (2005) www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/winds/
Mean 80-m Wind Speed in North America
Percent of Land+Near Shore Stations With Annual Wind Speeds
> 6.9 m/s at 80 mEurope
14.2North America
19.0United States over land
15.0United States over land+near shore
17.0South America
9.7Oceania
21.2Africa
4.6Asia
2.7Antarctica
60Global over land
13
Archer and Jacobson (2005)
Aggregate Wind Power (MW) From 81% of
Spain’s Grid Versus Time of Day, Oct. 26, 2005
Birds and WindU.S. bird deaths from current wind turbines 10,000-40,000/yr (!)U.S. bird deaths from communication towers: 50 million/yr (!)Worldwide bird deaths from avian flu: 200 million/yr (%)
Est. bird deaths with 2,500,000 turbines worldwide: 2.5-10 million/yr
Premature U.S. deaths fossil-/biofuel pollution: 50,000/yr (*)
The effect of wind turbines on birds will be small relative to the benefit of reducing fossil-biofuels on human and animal illness.
(!) Bird Conservancy (April 2006); (%) San Jose Mercury News (April 2006)(*) McCubbin and Delucchi (1999)
Path to Satisfy All U.S. Energy Needsand Reduce CO
2 and BC by 80%
Onshore &offshore wind
(50%)
Solar PV& thermal
(15%)
Efficiency(10%)
Hydroelectricgeothermalwave, tidalexistingnuclear(5%)
Existingfossil, biofuels
(20%)
M.Z. Jacobson
Land Area For 50% of US Energy From Wind
Map: www.fotw.net
Turbinearea
touchingground
Spacingbetweenturbines
Alternatively, Water Area For 50% of US Energy From Wind
Map: www.fotw.net
Spacingbetweenturbines
Dvorak et al. (2006)
<50 m deep
<20 m deep
2645 MW capacity (529 5 MW turbines), capacity factor of 42%Yields 5.9 TWh/yr (8.2% of California’s carbon electricity)Requires about 28 km (18 mi) or 2.1% of California’s 840 mi coast.
529 REpower5.0M turbines
Eureka Wind Park Example (Preliminary)
Dvorak et al. (2007)
SummaryGlobal warming will hasten as aerosol pollution decreases.
CO2 increases air pollution mortality due to its effect on temperature, water vapor, and atmospheric stability, which increase ozone and particulate matter in urban areas.
80% reductions in current emissions are needed to stabilize CO2. Corn ethanol cannot practically reduce CO2 in the U.S. by more than 0.07-0.2%; cellulosic ethanol cannot reduce CO2 by more than 1.3-4%, based on current understanding.
FF soot appears to cause about 13% (0.24 K) of the 1.9 K increase in temperatures due to AGHG+FF soot+urban surfaces. Its complete removal may eliminate about 30% of the net global warming (0.8 K) to date.
SummaryWind-battery electric vehicles can reduce U.S. CO2 by 25.5%; solar-battery electric vehicles can reduce it by 23.4% Wind turbines require 30 times less land than corn ethanol and 20 time less land than cellulosic ethanol for the same power.
Sufficient wind and solar are available worldwide to supply all electric and nonelectric energy needs simultaneously several times over and to solve air pollution/climate problems simultaneously.
More info: www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/E85vWindSol