Cardiomyopathy in Fabry’s disease - Unispital Basel · Cardiomyopathy in Fabry’s disease...
Transcript of Cardiomyopathy in Fabry’s disease - Unispital Basel · Cardiomyopathy in Fabry’s disease...
Cardiomyopathy in Fabry’sdisease
Herzinsuffizienzlunch Basel, 11.09.2018
Christiane GrunerKardiologie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich
Content
• Background / epidemiology• Differential diagnosis• Clinical presentations / manifestations• Treatment
• Devices• Fabry-specific treatment (ERT, Chaperone)
Fabry: classic later onset
• CLASSIC• Activity alpha-Galactosidases very low/inexistent
• Clinical presentation in childhood / adolsecence• Acroparesthesia, angiokeratoma, hypohidrosis, GI
symptoms, cornea verticillata• Later in disease course
cardiac manifestations, renal failure, cerebrovascular events
• LATER ONSET• Residual activity alpha-Galactosidases present
• Age of presentation >30 – 70 years• Cardiac, renal or cerebrovascular manifestations
Case 2 Case 3Case 1• 72 years old male• Normal kidney and
liver function• Negative family
history
• 38 years old male• Proteinuria• Mother, 1 brother,
1 sister affected
• 18 years old female• Normal kidney and
liver function• Elevated CK levels• Negative family
history
Differential Diagnosis LVHHCM (1:500): DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
Hypertensive heart diseaseAthlete’s heartMetabolic disorders Syndromal disorders
Fabry disease Friedreich’s ataxiaDanon diseaseGlycogen storage diseases
Noonan syndromeLEOPARD syndrome
PRKAG2 cardiomyopathy Infiltrative disordersMucopolysaccharidosis AmyloidosisOxalosis HemochromatosisMitochondrial cytopathies SarcoidosisHypothyroidismObesity
Diagnosis CMP
CMP
Past medical history
ECG
Imaging:EchoCMR
Lab results
Genetic testing
Clinical findings
Family history
Elliott P et al, Heart 2011;23:1957-60Monserrat L et al, JACC 2007;50(25):2399-403
Maron SM et al, Am J of Med 2018;131:200e200-200e8Linthorst GE et al, J Med Genet 2010;47:217-222
Prevalence of patients with Fabry disease in cohorts
with diagnosis of hypertrophic
cardiomyopathy0.5-1%
Prevalence of patients with Fabry disease in cohorts with unexplained LVH
4%
Red Flags in LVH
• Family history (family tree, X-linked, no male-to-male transmission)
• Various organs involved (physical exam, lab work)
• ECG: PQ interval, conduction abnormalities, extent of LVH
• Echo: speckle tracking pattern• CMR: evidence of storage disease, LGE
pattern, T1 mapping
Testing for Fabry
• Who?: Patients with unexplained LVH (males age >30, females age >40)
• How?: males: enzyme activity (leucocytes, heparin blood), females always genetics
Cardiac manifestations
• Left ventricular hypertrophy, right ventricular hypertrophy
• Diastolic dysfunction• Microvascular
dysfunction• Valvular manifestations• Aortic dilatation• Arrhythmias
Fabry Cohort The Heart Hospital, n = 207, mean FU 7.1 yearsHeart failure (NYHA III) 21 / 10%Atrial fibrillation 13 / 6%Bradycardia / Pacemaker 13 / 6%Cardiac death (5 SCD / 2 HF) 7 / 3%
Epidemiology MACE
Patel V et al, Heart 2015;101:961-966
Management Arrhythmias
• Screening at least yearly ECG and Holter-ECG
Brignole et al, EHJ 2013;34:2281-2239Wanner C et al, Mol Genet Metabol 2018;124:189-203
BRADYARRHYTHMIAS• Pacing indications following 2013 ESC
recommendations for cardiac pacing and CRT• EP study may be considered for further of evaluation
conduction abnormalities
ATRIAL FIBRILLATION• Oral anticoagulation (VKA)• Restoration sinus rhythm• No amiodarone
Ventricular Arrhythmias
• N = 73 prior to ERT• CMR at baseline: 48 patients fibrosis (1.8% of LVM),
25 patients without fibrosis• Mean FU 4.8 years• 57 patients were started on ERT according to
guidelines
Krämer J et al, Am J Cardiol 2014;114:895-900
No ERT ERTBaseline (n = 16)
FU (n = 16) Baseline(n = 57)
FU (n = 56)
LV mass (g/m2) 59 ± 11 61 ± 14 92 ± 33 90 ± 30Septal wall thickness (mm)
8.0 ± 1.6 8.6 ± 1.9 12.2 ± 3.7 12.3 ± 3.7
Ejection fraction (%) 60 ± 6 59 ± 8 64 ± 9 63 ± 9Fibrosis (% LV mass) 0.5 ± 0.8 0.7 ± 1.0 1.4 ± 1.9 2.5 ± 2.6
No Fibrosis (n = 25) Fibrosis (n = 48)LV mass (g/m2) 70 ± 16 93 ± 36Septal wall thickness (mm) 9.4 ± 2.4 12.2 ± 4.0Ejection fraction (%) 62 ± 7 64 ± 9Fibrosis (% LV mass) 0 1.8 ± 1.8Malignant ventricular arrhythmias 0 13 (27%)Sudden cardiac death 0 5 (10%)
Krämer J et al, Am J Cardiol 2014;114:895-900
• ERT does not prevent progress of fibrosis• annual increase of fibrosis in patients with ventricular
arrhythmias was 0.9% compared to 0.2% in patients without ventricular arrhythmias
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.00 2 4 6 8 10
Follow-up in years
Eve
nt fr
ee r
ate
p = 0.017
No fibrosis
Fibrosis
Indications for primary prophylactic Defibrillator
Wanner C et al, Mol Genet Metabol 2018;124:189-203
Indications for primary prophylactic defibrillator
• Extensive LVH• Nonsustained VTs• Syncope (arrhythmogenic)• Myocardial fibrosis• PM AICD?
• N = 387; 248 agalsidase alfa, 139 agalsidase beta• Beta-group: more classical forms, more kidney disease• FU time: alfa-group 5.2 years, beta-group 3.8 years
• No difference with regards to clinical events• Beta-group: trend to reduction in LV mass• Alfa-group: fewer patients had immunologic response
(antibodies)
Treatment success
Beck et al, Mol Genet and Metabol Reports 2015;21-27Krämer J et al, Am J Cardiol 2014;114:895-900
CARDIAC CONSIDERATIONS
• No effect on fibrosis• Preservation of disease
status on ERT start
EARLY TREATMENT