Car Transmission Design
-
Upload
khaja-uddin -
Category
Documents
-
view
299 -
download
3
Transcript of Car Transmission Design
Gears Design and Simulation for Gears Design and Simulation for
Car Transmission Car Transmission
Jiting Li, Weidong Guo, Mileta M Tomovic
School of TechnologyMechanical Engineering Technology
Outline
� About the Car Transmission
� Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
� Strength Design of the Gear Mesh
� Finite Elements Analysis of Gears
Download the file:
http://www.purdue.edu/discoverypark/PLM/SME/car_transmission.zip
About the Car Transmission
The transmission is used to increase the driving torque of the engine.It is connected to the engine through the clutch, and connected with drive shaft through U-joint.
Driving System Illustration [1]
Transmission Graphic Illustration [1]
About the Car Transmission
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
-999-3.38:1Reverse
3,3751:14th
2,5381.33:13rd
1,6792.01:12nd
9993.38:11st
RPM at Transmission Output Shaft with Engine at 3375 rpm
RatioGear
Assume that the transmission is required to have five different gear ratios, listed in the following Table.
Input ShaftOutput Shaft
Counter Shaft
Idler Gear Shaft
Z23
Z35
Z27
Z33
Z40
Z18 Z25 Z31
Z20
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
To meet the requirement, the mechanism of the transmission is designed as follows.
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
Z18
Z20
Z40
Z25
Gear
33Z33
1831Z31
2027Z27
4035Z35
2523Z23
Tooth numberTooth numberGear
And the tooth number of the gears is listed in the following table.
Note! The transmission mechanism comes from literature [2].
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
Then the simulation is carried on to validate the kinematic design result. All the gears and shafts are first modeled and assembled incertain solid modeling software, such as Solidworks and Unigraphics, and then imported into the kinematic and dynamic analysis software ADAMS/View to do the kinematic simulations.
First Gear
Z23
Z35
Z40
Z18
38.31823
4035
ZZ
ZZGR
1823
40351 =
×
×==Transmission ratio
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
First Gear Simulation
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
Second Gear
Z23
Z35
Z33
Z25
01.22523
3335
ZZ
ZZGR
2523
33352 =
×
×==Transmission ratio
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
Second Gear Simulation
Third Gear
Transmission ratio 33.13123
2735
ZZ
ZZGR
3123
27353 =
×
×==
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
Z27
Z31
Z23
Z35
Third Gear Simulation
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
Fourth Gear
Connecting Shaft
Transmission ratio 1GR 4 =
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
Fourth Gear Simulation
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
Reverse
Z23
Z35
Z40
Z18
38.31823
4035
ZZ
ZZGR
1823
4035rev −=
×
×−=−=Transmission ratio
Z20
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
Reverse Simulation
Kinematic Design and Simulation of the Transmission
Strength Design for Gear MeshThere are five pairs of gear mesh to be designed. Here we just take the first pair,
i.e., the gear mesh 1, for an example. The design method for others are same.
Note! All the Equations, Figures and Tables will be used are come from literature [3].
Requirements: Design a 1.522:1 helical-gear reduction for a 18-hp, output shaft of
engine running at 3375rpm. The load is medium shock, providing a reliability of
0.95 at 109 revolutions of the pinion. Using through hardened steel, grade 1 material.
Solutions: Make the a priori decisions as
•Function:18hp, 3375rpm, R=0.95, N=109 cycles, Ko=1.35
•Design factor for unquantifiable exingencies: nd=3
•Tooth system: Φn=20°, helix angle: ψ=20°•Tooth count: NP=23 teeth, NG= 35 teeth
•Quality number: Qv=8, use grade 1 material
•Assume mB≥1.2 in Eq.(14-40), KB=1
Pitch: Select a trial diametral pitch of Pd=8 teeth/in. Thus, dP=23/8=2.875 in and dG=35/8=4.375 in. From Table 14-2,YP=3.334, YG=0.374. From Fig. 14-6, JP=0.345,JG=0.375.
lbf833.233272.2540
1833000
V
H33000W
ft/min272.254012
75π(2.875)33
12
nπdV
t
pp
=×
==
===
From Eqs.(14-28) and (14-27),
404.172.70
272.254072.70
A
VAK
72.70)63.01(5650)B1(5650A
63.0)812(25.0)Q12(25.0B
63.0B
v
3/23/2
v
=
+=
+=
=−+=−+=
=−=−=
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
From Eq.(14-38)
885.0)95.01ln(0759.0658.0)R1ln(0759.0658.0KR =−−=−−=
From Fig.14-14,
874.0)522.1/10(6831.1)522.1/N(6831.1)(Y
862.0)10(6831.1N6831.1)(Y
0323.090323.0
GN
0323.090323.0
PN
===
===
−−
−−
From Fig.14-15,
791.0)522.1/10(466.2)522.1/N(466.2)(Z
773.0)10(466.2N466.2)(Z
056.09056.0
GN
056.09056.0
PN
====
===
−−
−−
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
From the recommendation after Eq. (14-8), 3p ≤ F≤5p. Try F=1.57 in.
From Eq.(a), Sec. 14-10,
061.18
334.057.1192.1
P
YF192.1K
0535.00535.0
s =
=
=
From Eqs.(14-31), (14-33), (14-35), Cmc=Cpm=Ce=1. From Fig. 14-11, Cma=0.11 for commercial enclosed gear units. From Eq. (14-32),
037.0)57.1(0125.00375.0)875.2(10
57.1F0125.00375.0
d10
FC
P
Pf =+−=+−=
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
From Eq. (14-30),
147.1)]1(11.0)1(037.0[11)CCCC(C1K emapmpfmcm =++=++=
From Table 14-8, for steel gears, psi2300CP =
°==Ψ
Φ=Φ 17.21
20cos
20tgarctg
cos
tgarctg n
t o
o
in341.117.21cos2
875.2cosrr tPbP =°=Φ=
in040.217.21cos2
375.4cosrr tGbG =°=Φ=
in125.08
1
P
1a ===
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
[ ] [ ]
581.017.21sin)2
375.4
2
875.2(
040.2)125.02
375.4(341.1)125.0
2
875.2(
sin)rr(r)ar(r)ar(Z
2/1
22
2/1
22
tGP
2/12
bG
2
G
2/12
bP
2
P
=°+−
−++
−+=
Φ+−−++−+=
in393.08P
pn =π
=π
=
143.018
8
2
20sin20cos
1P
P
2
20sin20cosI =
+=
+=
oooo
669.0)581.0(95.0
20cos393.0
Z95.0
cosp
Z95.0
Pm nnN
N ==Φ
==
o
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
in963.0)862.0(40000
)885.0(1
345.0
)1(147.1)8(061.1)404.1(35.1)833.233(3
YS
KK
J
KKPKKKWn)F(
Nt
RT
P
Bmdsvo
t
dbend
==
=
Pinion tooth bending.
With the above estimates of Ks and Km from the trial dimetral pitch, we check to see if the mesh width F is controlled by bending or wear considerations. Choose the hardness of steel through-hardened HB=350. From Fig. 14-2
Equating Eqs. (14-15) and (14-17), substituting ndWt for Wt and solving
for face with (F)bend necessary to resist bending fatigue, we obtain
kpsi 401280077.3HBSt =+=
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
psi 41800100912HB223Sc =+=
From Fig. 14-5,
Then
in790.0)143.0(875.2
)1(147.1061.1)404.1(35.1)833.233(3
885.0)1(141800
)773.0(2300
Id
CKKKKWn
KKS
ZC)F(
2
P
fmsvo
t
d
2
RTC
Np
wear
=
=
=
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
DecisionMake face width 1.2 in. Correct Ks and Km:
046.18
334.02.1192.1
P
YF192.1K
0535.00535.0
s =
=
=
019.0)2.1(0125.00375.0)875.2(10
2.1F0125.00375.0
d10
FC
P
Pf =+−=+−=
129.1)]1(11.0)1(019.0[11)CCCC(C1K emapmpfmcm =++=++=
psi768.10115345.0
)1(129.1
2.1
8)046.1(404.1)35.1(833.233
J
KK
F
PKKKW)(
P
Bmdsvo
t
P
==
=σ
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
The bending stress induced by Wt in bending, from Eq. (14-15), is
psi768.10115345.0
)1(129.1
2.1
8)046.1(404.1)35.1(833.233
J
KK
F
PKKKW)(
P
Bmdsvo
t
P
==
=σ
The factor of safety in bending of the pinion, from Eq. (14-41), is
852.3768.10115
)]885.0(1[)862.0(40000
)KK(YS
)S( RT
Nt
PF ==σ
=
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
Decision.Gear tooth bending. Use cast gear blank because of the 4.375-in pitch diameter. Use the same material, heat treatment, and nitriding. The load-induced bending stress is in the rotio of JP /JG. Then
psi507.9306375.0
345.0768.10115
J
J)()(
G
PPG ==σ=σ
245.4507.9306
)]885.0(1[)874.0(40000
)S( GF ==
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
Pinion tooth wear.The contact stress, given by Eq. (14-16), is
psi593.74914143.0
1
)2.1(875.2
129.1)046.1(404.1)35.1(833.2332300
I
C
Fd
KKKKWC)( f
P
msvo
t
PPC
==
=σ
The factor of safety from Eq. (14-42), is
653.1593.74914
)]885.0(1[1)773.0(141800
)KK(CZS
)S(C
RT
HNC
PH ==σ
=
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
By our definition of factor of safety, pinion wear is
3n733.2653.1)S( d
22
H P=<==
So make face width larger, F=1.57 in.
The factor of safety (SH)P is
863.1551.66486
)]885.0(1[1)773.0(141800
)KK(CZS
)S(C
RT
HNC
PH ==σ
=
psi551.66486143.0
1
)57.1(875.2
147.1)061.1(404.1)35.1(833.2332300)( PC ==σ
3n471.3863.1)S( d
22
H P=>==
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
By our definition of factor of safety, both of pinion bending and wear are larger than nd.
Gear tooth wear. The hardness of the gear and pinion are the same. Thus the contact stress on the gear is the same as the pinion,
The wear strength is also the same, SC = 141800 psi. The factor of safety of the gear in wear is
906.1551.66486
)]885.0(1[1)791.0(141800
)S( GH ==
psi551.66486)( GC =σ
By our definition of factor of safety, both of gear bending and wear are larger than nd.
634.3906.1)S( 22
H G==
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
Rim. Keep MB ≥ 1.2. The whole depth is
in281.08
25.2
P
25.2
P
25.1
P
1dedendumaddendumh
ddd
t ===+=+=
The rim thickness tR is
in337.0)281.0(2.1hmt tBR ==≥
For other pinions and gears in this transmission, we can use the same method and process to calculate their bending and wear stresses.
Strength Design for Gear Mesh
Finite Elements Analysis of Gears
This will be done in a few days !
Reference
1. http://auto.howstuffworks.com/transmission.htm
2. Richard Stone and Jeffrey K. Ball, Automotive Engineering Fundamentals. SAE International, 2004.
3. Joseph E. Shigley, Charles R. Mischke and Richard G. Budynas, Mechanical Engineering Design (7th edition), Higher Education, 2003.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the support from the Society for Manufacturing Engineers - Education Foundation,
SME-EF Grant #5004 for “Curriculum Modules in Product
Lifecycle Management.”