Cadrega s.p.a

21
Andrea Brambilla Filippo Cheli Gianmaria Grandinetti 807927 806811 810661

Transcript of Cadrega s.p.a

Andrea Brambilla

Filippo Cheli

Gianmaria Grandinetti

807927

806811

810661

Summary

Market analysis

Corporate vision

Cadrega’s goals

Conclusions

Analysis by period & trend’s indeces

2

Market analysis

Two different markets

In order to sell products in

business to business market two

constraints must be respected:

1. Minimum level of quality;

2. Maximum price.

The market’s segment is

characterized by a strong

bullwhip’s effect.

4

0

100

200

300

400

500

600 Fabrics

Fittings

Furniture

Wholesaler’ Demand

Two different markets

In the market business to

consumer the clients’ decisions

are driven by:

1. Price;

2. Quality;

3. Brand.

The demand is affected by a

seasonally trend.

5

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

Fabrics

Fittings

Furniture

Economic Trend

Three product lines

6

Here below the average of price and quality, for each product lines, are

reported according to the historical data of the previous two years.

Fabrics:

- Avg price: 286 €

- Avg quality: 63,6%

Fittings:

- Avg price: 87,8 €

- Avg quality: 63,6 %

Furniture:

- Avg price: 803,3 €

- Avg quality: 63,9%

Raw materials (Kraljic)

Leverage products

Routine products

Strategic products

Bottleneck products

Low

Low High

Fin

an

cia

l im

pa

ct

Supply risk 7

High

Imported raw materials

Outsourcing

Local raw materials

8

Corporate strategy

Products: high quality guaranteed by the exclusive use of local raw

material

Price:Established with the mark-up model (around 30%) and belonging to the high-end market

Place:The management aim is to increase the number of

central shops reducing the number of suburban ones in order to be coherent with the new product positioning.

Promotion:Investments in «advertising» and «promotion» will be the most constant and consistent as possible.

9

4P model

10

Cadrega’s goals

11

Cadrega’s goals

The goals of the new management are:

To win the high-end market;

To reduce stocks ( both of finished goods and raw material);

To Improve production performance;

To achieve a higher quality in products.

12

Periods’ analysis

13

January-March 2017

EBIT Share value

Succ

ess

Failu

re

Stra

tegy

& m

arke

ts• High quality;• Saturation of

production Capacity.

• Market share below the average;

• Sales over the expectation in the B2B;

• The best ratio quality/price.

• Wrong forecasteddemand.

Budgeted revenues Actual revenues Delta revenues

46.267.765 € 45.015.460 € -1.252.305 €

Succ

ess

Failu

re

Stra

tegy

& m

arke

ts

14

April-June 2017

EBIT Share value

• Prices more competitive butalways a high-end price.

• Achievedmaximum sales in B2B market.

• Decline of market share;

• Increasing of pricingimportance.

Budgeted revenues Actual revenues Delta revenues

41.239.456 € 39.843.200 € -1.396.256 €

Succ

ess

Failu

re

Stra

tegy

& m

arke

ts

15

July-Septembre 2017

EBIT Share value

• Get a betterbudget revenues-investments ratio;

• Sale of all rawmaterial stock.

• Large gap betweenbudgeted and actual revenues;

• Considerablewarehouse cost.

• 28 leasing machinesto improveproduction capacity;

• Wrong pricingaccording to the average.

Budgeted revenues Actual revenues Delta revenues

52.210.725 € 29.866.400 € -22.344.325 €

16

October-December 2017

EBIT Share value

Succ

ess

Failu

re

Stra

tegy

& m

arke

ts

• Reduction of finished goodsstocks;

• slowing the loss of value.

• Lower pricing for fittings to wincompetitors’ client and reduce stock of FG.

• Only 40% of machinarysaturation;

• 30 ownedmachines sold.

Budgeted revenues Actual revenues Delta revenues

25.795.586 € 33.551.880 € 7.756.294€

17

January-March 2018

EBIT Share value

Succ

ess

Failu

re

Stra

tegy

& m

arke

ts

• Reduction of finished goodsstocks;

• Get a higher share volume for fittings;

• Operative profit returns positive.

• Use of outsourcing for Furniture;

• Get the secondchoice sales for fittings.

• Dismiss 40 sales persons;

• Reduction in qualitylevel.

Budgeted revenues Actual revenues Delta revenues

37.554.987 € 41.027.220 € 3.472.233€

Conclusions

19

S.W.O.T. analysis

• Process quality;• Machines’s times;• Location of shops.

Strenghts Weaknesses

Opportunities Threats

• Wholesalers market;• Get larger market

share.

• Production capacity;• Debt;• Pricing strategy.

• Volatile prices of competitors;

• Brand’s leader;• Investments-revenue

ratio.

20

Successes and failures

• Win, in part, the high end market;• Production performances increased;• Better management of point of sale;• Total reduction of raw material stock.

• To increase the net profit;• Reduction of finished good stocks;• Estimation of adjusted finish goods stock;• Financial management: debts with banks;• Lack of flexibility.

Thanks for your

time

21