CADRe Update for 2017 Cost and Schedule Symposium Eric … · 2018-05-04 · Office of the Chief...

Office of the Chief Financial Officer

1

CADRe Update for2017 Cost and Schedule Symposium

Eric PlumerAUGUST 29, 2017

For Internal Use Only


For Internal Use Only 2

Briefing Outline

• CADRe Document

• CADRe Requirements, Thresholds, & Uses

• 2017 CADRe Focus Group highlights

• 2016-2017 New Accomplishments

• 2018 Planned Work



Overview of CADRe

• What is CADRe:– The CADRe is a means to collect and track, by milestone, a project’s historical

programmatic, technical, and cost information

– CADRe consists of three parts: Part A is general descriptive information, Part B provides technical data, and Part C contains project cost data

– The CADRe’s are stored in the One NASA Cost Engineering (ONCE) database to facilitate broader NASA cost, schedule, and technical communities Note, CADRes are not released to broader community until after project launch date

• Why is CADRe important:– CADRe serves as key source documentation for the NASA Strategic Investment

Division (SID) as well as the broader NASA cost, schedule, and technical communities. It provides a historical record of cost, schedule, and technical project attributes so that analysts can better estimate future similar projects.

– CADRes describes project mission and approach that facilitates understanding of what is driving costs. CADRe contains objective technical data that tend to drive costs.

– Facilitates consistent Agency data retrieval for a given project



CADRe Overview

• CADRe is a Requirement in 7120.5E

• The collection of CADRe documents has already proven

successful in providing a mechanism to:•Perform data driven analysis

•Track and explain changes from milestone to milestone

•Provides historical data to help perform JCL Analysis

•Estimate cost and schedule of new projects

•Build data driven products to help answer difficult programmatic

questions.

•Calibrate NASA’s cost models which will help improve cost estimates for

future projects.



Cost Analysis Data Requirement (CADRe)

• A three-part document:– Part A: Describes a NASA project at each milestone (SRR, PDR, CDR, SIR, Launch and End of Mission),

and describes significant changes that have occurred.

– Part B: Contains standardized templates to capture key technical parameters that are considered to drive cost (Mass, Power, Data Rates).

– Part C: Captures the NASA project’s Cost Estimate and actual life cycle costs within the project’s and a NASA Cost Estimating Work Breakdown Structures (WBS).

– Note: THE “LAUNCH” CADRes for a mission captures the final costs and as-built mass, and power data. The SRR, PDR, CDR CADRes contain Current Best Estimates.

Part A:

Descriptive

Information

Part B:

Technical

Data

Part C:

Life Cycle

Cost Estimate

Management

Agreement

UFE managed

above the project

KDP-C

Project Reserves/UFE

SRRPDR

UFE managed

above the project


UFE managed

above the project

Project Reserves/ UFE

CDRUFE managed

above the project


SIRUFE managed

above the project

LRD

CADRe CADReCADRe

CADRe

CADRe

Project LCCE

Project LCCE

Project LCCE Project LCCE Project LCCEProject LCCE

Any Remaining

UFE back to MD

PI Cost + Project Oversight + LV = MA

CADRe Part CCapture LCC from the Project’s View

Agency Baseline Commitment (ABC)• 70% JCL

• External Commitments

6

7

Program

Phases

Formulation Implementation

KDP-A KDP-B KDP-C KDP-D KDP-E

Flight Projects

Life Cycle

Phases

Pre-Phase A:

Concept

Studies

Phase A:

Concept

Development

Phase B:

Preliminary Design

Phase C:

Detailed Design

Phase D:

Fabrication,

Assembly & Test

Phase E:

Operations &

Sustainment

Phase F:

Disposal

SRR/MDR PDR CDR SIR Launch EOM

Traditional

Waterfall

Development

or Directed

Missions1

CR2 3 4 5 6

Down

AO-Driven

Projects

Select

Step 1Select Step 2

CR

1 2 3 4 5 6

Mission Decision Review3 Update as necessary CADRe, All Parts

30-45 days after CDR 5All parts of CADRe due 30-45 days 90 days after launch,

1 using CDR material after KDP B as built or as deployed

configuration

CADRe delivered; based on Update as necessary 30-45 1 4Concept Study Report (CSR) days after KDP-D using 6 CADRe, update Part C only

and winning proposal SIR material at the End of Planned

MissionAll parts of CADRe due 30-45 days 2

after KDP-C using PDR material

Temporal Aspects CADRe

8

Project Requirements for a CADRe

• The Project Needs to have a Beginning Point and End Point • Projects that have finish dates have milestone reviews which is where

CADRe works best. Having a completion date is important• Level of effort research projects don’t make good CADRe material

• Research on properties of propellants or making jet engines quieter won’t lend itself to a CADRe.

• The Project Needs to have a “measurable” product• Requires some hardware or software that can be touched, weighed,

measured in someway. Can be flight and ground articles includes HW and SW. This is necessary to complete a Part B

• The Project Needs to be a Complete and Whole End Product• Piece parts of hardware such as instruments can be done but it is more

challenging.

• The Project Needs to have a Life Cycle Cost Estimate • Needed for completion of Part C. • Updating the LCCE allows for capturing changes over time• Temporal aspect



CADRe Scope and Dollar Thresholds

There are no stated $ thresholds for CADRe in our policy documents• Positive-- Gives us flexibility for doing CADRes on lower dollar threshold projects • Negative—Projects can attempt to get a CADRe waiver since they feel the dollar

amount is low enough to justify not having a CADRe, and nothing is written in policy to object.

IN GENERALCADRe covers nearly all 7120.5E (Cat I, II, III) for missions over $150M dollars. (flight and significant ground projects)

CADRe funding; Will complete CADRes for smaller missions as funding permits.• Instrument only projects in SMD• larger STMD Missions-cover all projects over $150M in 7120.8 • Unique ISS Projects• Larger CubeSat projects such as iSAT

Provide CADRe funding for large projects that are not strictly space flight projects within 7120.8. Here is where it gets real confusing –

• CADRe is NOT a requirement for projects solely under 7120.8



CADRe Requirements, Thresholds, & Uses



CADRe is centralized in SID

• Recognition that historical “Data Capture” is not high on a project’s list of

priorities. Delivering flight hardware, and delivering science is priority

• STANDARDIZATION: Configuration Control of all CADRe templates are

maintained within SID

• FOCUS: SID being the champion for CADRe helps ensure

homogeneous product for database purposes.

• CONSITENCY: SID is the voice to communicate, Coordinate,

Disseminate Templates, Structure and Policy.

• UNIFORMITY: SID being the single point for CADRe administration is

efficient

• Current CADRe experience has proven effective, which is a contrast with

other data capture experiences at NASA



Who’s Who in CADRe-ville

12

The mayor of Whoville

SID funds, directs and manages day to day activities of all CADRe development using several support contractors

• AEROSPACE--SMD Missions• SAIC -- HEO Missions• TECOLOTE— STMD and ISS Missions• JPL-- JPL Missions• APL- Data Support, CADRe Support

AEROSPACE-- SMD Missions. full compliment of Science Mission Directorate flight projects including JPSS-2, WFIRST, GOES-S, JWST, Solar Probe Plus, GOLD, TESS, Landsat-9, DART, TESS, GPIM, Lucy

JPL-- SMD Missions. JPL team engages with the JPL Projects to build the CADRes including kickoff meetings and data collection with JPL projects.

SAIC--HEOMD & SMD. Primary projects are MPCV, SLS, GSDO, ICESAT-2.

TECOLOTE -- STMD, ISS Tier 2 Projects, ARMD. Unique and innovative CADRes that require special CADRe techniques.

APL--Data support for CADRe and NICM and review/signature coordination with APL



2016-17- CADRe Accomplishments

CADRes Completed iSAT PDR

GPIM PostSIR

GEDI PDR

eCryo 2nd Annual Review

TESS CDR

Radiation Budget Instrument (RBI) PDR

Jason-3 SIR

Space Network Ground Segment (SGSS) Post-CDR

LDSD Launch CADRe (Tech Demo)

Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3) EoM

JPSS-2 SRR

Mars2020 PDR

The Low Density Supersonic Decelerators (LDSD) #3

GOES-R SIR

ICESAT-2 (SIR)

Surface Water Ocean Topography (SWOT) PDR

GOES-S (SIR)

Ground System Development Office (GSDO CDR)

Total and Spectral Solar Irradiance Sensor TSIS CDR

OSIRIS-REX Launch

Solar Probe Plus SIR

GEDI CDR

Restore-L SRR

RBI dSRR

RBI CDR

CADRes Kicked Off LANDSAT-9 SRR

GEDI PDR

Solar Probe Plus (SIR)

GEDI CDR

ICON SIR

Restore-L SRR

PACE SRR

OSIRIS-Rex Launch CADRe

DART (SRR)

JPSS-2 PDR

ICON SIR

Low Boom Flight Demonstration Quiet Supersonic

Transport (QueSST) X-plane

SAGE III Launch

Lucy SRR

Psyche SRR

eCryo Annual Review #3

DART SRB Review at APL

JPSS CGS Operation Readiness Review

EO-1 satellite Phase F KDP

GOLD PSR Solar Orbiter Collaboration (SOC) Heavy Ion

Sensor (HIS) and SoloHI Instruments

GeoCarb mission


For Internal Use Only14

CADRe Accomplishments

Cumulative CADRe Completions across NASA

Year by Year CADRe Completions across NASA

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Completed & Signed CADRes

In Process CADRes



CADRe Metrics

Number of Completed CADRes by Center- Nearly all CADRes are unmanned missions which is currently most represented at GSFC and JPL



CADRe Accomplishments

Number of Completed CADRes by Milestone. LRD, EOM, CADRe Plus will contain actual parameters.



2017 CADRe Focus Group highlights



2017 CADRe/ONCE Focus Group

CADRe Developers Workshop held on 4 May 2017. First year that it was virtual• In Attendance

• NASA SID · Aerospace

• TECOLOTE · SAIC

• JPL

• ~30 Attendees

– Topic focus included:

Part A New Executive Summary, Change Log.

Part B template revisions, Power Parameters, Full Review/Design of Summary Table, SW Logical vs Physical. New Mission Types.

Part C, Both Fiscal Year and by Phase.

– Action Item Listing Developed during the Workshop

Divided into General Actions, CADRe Template Actions, and ONCE Actions

• ONCE Action Items

– New Template updates will be integrated into ONCE

ONCE updates, CADRe upload



Hello CADRe superstar users,

In late spring I’m holding a focus group with my

CADRe authors to go over good CADRe

development practices. The CADRe has improved

over the years because of input from our users such

as yourself.

Please let me know if you have any suggestions for

specific CADRe improvements that you would find

useful in your particular line of work. This also

includes any improvements to the ONCE database

itself. Simply send me a sentence or two for your

suggestion by April 15th.

As a reminder CADRe has three key parts:

Part A: Detailed Descriptions, to help analysts

understand the overall level of complexity and

technology used for the project.

Part B: Technical Data Sheets, where the key

technical parameters are captured that can support

cost/schedule analysis at different stages and levels.

(The Launch and EOM CADRes contain final mass,

power, and other tech parameters)

Part C: Programmatic Capture, showing the project’s

LCCE, Schedule, and Risk posture. (The Launch

and EOM CADRes contain actual costs while earlier

milestone CADRes are the project’s estimates)

Thanks again for all your continued support and

input!

Appreciatively,

Eric

19

CADRe User Input

• Actively petitioned user input using ONCE database to query super users across Part A, B, C

• Received ~1 Dozen responses and discussed them at the Focus Group

• Common Themes: • Notification of when CADRes get posted• Access to full up source packages and

documentation• Provide more cost detail on instruments• Conduct data collection for Balloon missions• More data on Cubesat missions• Expansion of other types of projects• More detail on Integration and Test• Better explanation of Power• More detail on Section A.5• ONCE Related: Build a Percent Factors Capability• Include a Summary Report across all Milestones



20

Workshop Action Item List

Successful Focus Group: 33 Separate Actions

• Re-engineered Power Parameters to allow selectable menu of power modes.

• Disconnect average and peak power calculations in template so a sum is not forced on data. Make CADRes more consistent with NICM type data.

• Re-engineered the Summary Table for clarity • Section A.5. Now an Executive Summary for LRD, EOM • Change Log has now been formalized in Part A. • Provide update on SW physical and logical definitions

without using the actual physical and logical terms within the definition.

• Adapted solar array menu . There is never a time that an array is single or dual axis and not be deployed

• Rename A.1.2.1 to Launch and Launch Vehicle Description

• Improve instrument delivery mechanism.• Add in Lagrange; Primitive Body (Comets, Asteroids) to

Mission Type drop down • Mission System Parameter Tab - link mass and power

values to summary table • Adjustments to GDS template

Action\Request\Comment Application Status Requestor Assigned To

When using a mass or power allocation - make sure it's noted as an allocation rather than a true breakdown. Need to know if it's manipulated. CADRe Completed Chris Chromik N/A

John wasn't sure about including data from prior milestones (e.g. MEL/PEL to back up allocations) - thought it would introduce confusion. Mike pointed out that it's always best to have actual values rather than derived values in ONCE. CADRe Completed John Spagnuolo N/A

Vahe provided explanation and examples to explain power value differences between NICM and CADRe many times in past with projects and users of these products. FYI Completed Vahe Mazmanian N/A

The way CADRe template is set up with formulas for power section is causing trouble. Should break down so each instrument is independently reflecting power values and a separate area for SC power that doesn't require a roll-up. CADRe Completed Vahe Mazmanian N/A

When pulling data for CER purposes she assumes that data is pure on instrument tab - would not assume some arbitrary mode that is related to SC and it's predominant operation mode is being used down at the instrument level.

CADRe Completed Sara Lang N/A

Disconnect average and peak power calculations in template so a sum is not forced on data. Make CADRes more consistent with NICM type data. Notate in CADRe that values aren't related to total system values. CADRe Completed Eric Plumer Eric

Add pull down menus to CADRe (including on summary table) that allows selection of power mode (e.g. insert after column F in SC HW Parms tab) CADRe Completed Greg Henning Eric

Got 533s in past that would be summed up so much that wasn't usable (e.g. total-total FTEs). Can CADRe developer's get access to 533 data? CADRe Completed Chris Chromik N/A

Risk data applicable if it's little bit before and after (1 to 2 month delta) as long as in general time frame - is that true? CADRe Completed John Spagnuolo N/A

Correct note in Column P in Risk Register so that Column O is identified rather than Column N. CADRe Completed John Spagnuolo Eric

What does Description/Example mean in column A of the Risk Register if you don't want input? Perhaps remove title and change title to "Risk #" or something that doesn't lead the developer to hunt down a description. CADRe Completed John Spagnuolo Eric

Add in visual indicator when ONCE is searching or "thinking". ONCE Open User Feedback Mike

Devise listing of most useful documents for CADRe development to aid in direction for the project office and utilize time most efficiently. CADRe Completed User Feedback Eric

A.1.2.1 Launch description is concerning - includes flyby and destination maneuvers data requests which is non-sensical. CADRe Completed John Spagnuolo Eric

Combine A.1.3 to A.1.2.1 because A.1.3. ends up being redundant. CADRe Completed Rudy Firpo Eric

Capitalize "b" in Test beds in Part A TOC CADRe Completed Rudy Firpo Eric

Suggest adding change log to be inserted after signature page in template. CADRe Completed Mike Blandford Eric

Requirements should always be plural in "Cost Analysis Data Requirements" FYI Completed John Spagnuolo N/A

Add some text to the A.4 Project Level Description in Part A CADRe Completed John Spagnuolo Eric

Suggest eliminating "History" section from Part A CADRe Completed Rudy Firpo N/A

Relabel Program/Project History table to indicate to be completed only for CADRe Plus CADRe Completed Eric Plumer Eric

Provide tweak on physical and logical definitions without using the actual physical and logical terms within the definition. CADRe Completed Eric/Vera/John Aerospace/JPL

Add in GDS WBS Element for estimated/actual section in CADRe Plus template CADRe Completed Eric Plumer Eric

Part B Payload Parms- Improve A34 Instrument Delivery Mechanism definition CADRe Completed Eric Plumer Eric

All Parts A, B, C--Make sure tab names are correct in headers in print mode CADRe Completed Eric Plumer Eric

Add two drop down columns (deployable/not deployable; axis) for solar array type CADRe Completed Eric Plumer Eric

Suggest adding TBD to fields where N/A is a choice in CADRe template. CADRe Completed John Spagnuolo N/A

Suggest removing Deployed from options as it seems redundant (axis means deployed and anything else would be body mounted). Perhaps pinging a Solar Array expert is in order. CADRe Completed Eric Plumer Eric

Add in Lagrange; Primitive Body (Comets, Asteroids) to Mission Type drop down CADRe Completed Eric Plumer Eric

Edit Summary table interface so that the labels and format are easier to follow CADRe Completed John Spagnuolo John Spagnuolo

Mission System Parameter Tab - link mass and power values to summary table CADRe Completed Eric Plumer Eric

Gravity Probe B CADRe Plus stalled because no new data. Part A is complete - is it possible to publish Part A alone? CADRe Open Rudy Firpo Eric



21

Version 7.5 CADRe Template

• Now have selectable Power Modes

• Menu of Power Modes, most commonly used

• Flows to other Spacecraft and Instrument Sheets



Version 7.5 Template (Previous)

Spacecraft Mass and Power similar to previous template versions with addition of Numerical Entry, Option Selection, Auto-Sum Values

• Previous Part B (Spacecraft and Payload) did not allow for varying Power Modes



Note: It is permissible to overwrite a cell equation if only the total exits. If there is a total but the children don't add up--then use the unallocated mass line for the difference

Spacecraft HW Mass and Power Totals: Structures & Mechanisms

Average Power Average Power (CBE+ Peak Power Peak Power (CBE+

Assembly Name Mass (CBE) Mass (CBE+ Cont) Average Power Mode (CBE) Cont) Peak Power Mode (CBE) Cont) Dimensions

Structures & Mechanisms Total 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

Primary Structures 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

Load Carrying Shell/Truss

Equipment Compartments

Booms

Adapters

Secondary Structures 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

Equipment (Instrument) Mountings

Ballast Mass

Mechanisms 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

Positioning

Deployment and Storage Equipment

Docking Mechanisms

Other

Pyrotechnics

Other

Unallocated

Thermal Control

Average Power Average Power (CBE+ Peak Power Peak Power (CBE+

Assembly Name Mass (CBE) Mass (CBE+ Cont) Average Power Mode (CBE) Cont) Peak Power Mode (CBE) Cont) Dimensions

Thermal Control Total 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

Active Devices 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

Cryogenic Devices

Liquid Loops

Electric Cooling (Thermoelectric)

Electric Heaters Thermistors &

Thermostats

Shutters and Louvers

Passive Devices 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

Radiator Panel/Fins

Coatings

Heat Pipes

Insulation

Conductive Structures

Heat Activated Structures

Sun Shields

Second Surface Mirrors

Other

Unallocated

Version 7.5 Template (New)

• New Part B (Spacecraft and Payload) allows for Power Modes• Automatically pulled from System Parameter Sheet• Pull Down Menu



Version 7.0 Template (Previous)

• Previous Summary Menu-• Created challenges because of new selectable Power Modes-



Version 7.5 Template (New) WARNING:

SYSTEM SUMMARY TABLE

CBE Mass

CBE Mass

w/Contingency Average Power Mode Avg Power Avg Power w/ Cont Peak Power Mode CBE Peak Power

CBE Peak Power

w/Contingency

Payload Total 0.00 kg 0.00 kg Payload

Instrument 1 Instrument 1

Instrument 2 Instrument 2

Rover Total (Dry) 0.00 kg 0.00 kg Rover

Structures & Mechanisms 0.00 kg 0.00 kg Structures & Mechanisms 0.00 W 0.00 W 0.00 W 0.00 W

Thermal 0.00 kg 0.00 kg Thermal 0.00 W 0.00 W 0.00 W 0.00 W

Electrical Power Subsystem 0.00 kg 0.00 kg Electrical Power Subsystem 0.00 W 0.00 W 0.00 W 0.00 W

Guidance, Navigation & Control 0.00 kg 0.00 kg Guidance, Navigation & Control 0.00 W 0.00 W 0.00 W 0.00 W

Telecommunications 0.00 kg 0.00 kg Telecommunications 0.00 W 0.00 W 0.00 W 0.00 W

Command and Data Handling 0.00 kg 0.00 kg Command and Data Handling 0.00 W 0.00 W 0.00 W 0.00 W

EDL Total (Dry) 0.00 kg 0.00 kg EDL





Propulsion (not incl. Propellant & Pressurant) 0.00 kg 0.00 kg



Carrier/Orbiter Total (Dry) 0.00 kg 0.00 kg Carrier/Orbiter





Propulsion (not incl. Propellant & Pressurant) 0.00 kg 0.00 kg



Propellant & Pressurant 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

EDL Propellant & Pressurant 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

Carrier/Orbiter Propellant & Pressurant 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

Total Mass (Dry) 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

Total Mass (Wet) 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

LV Capability 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

Launch Mass Margin 0.00 kg 0.00 kg

% Launch Mass Margin #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Individual Instrument Power: (These values represent peak and average in isolation and independent from any mission power modes )

Instrument Name Avg Power Avg Power w/ Cont CBE Peak Power

CBE Peak Power

w/Contingency

Enter Instrument Name

Enter Instrument Name

Total Power

Do not sum power values to calculate a mission total power as there could be different power modes utilized. Refer to BOL and

EOL in Spacecraft Tab (Rows 22 and 23).

• Now clear Separation between Mass and Power sections• Now includes separate Individual Instrument Power- True Avg and Peak power• Warning not to simply sum power values to get a mission total



261/29/

2018

CADRe Improvement Process

Requested update verified by SID

CADRe Master Sheet Updated

CADRe Sheet provided to

CADRe Developer

Developer Makes Update in Source

CADRe

Updated CDs prepared and

loaded to ONCE


• ® . . .

. .

I l J

Creating a Change Log Office of the

Chief Financial Officer

Sample Change Log Example

DATE REVISION BY SECTION(S) CHANGED REASON FOR CHANGE REVISION

09/03/2013 Daniel Belter Initial Release -

02/27/2014 Daniel Belter C Amended cost with Univ Texas contributions. A

07/20/2015 Daniel Belter B Changed Sys Lvl Parms tab ‘Number of

Instruments’ from 4 to 5.

B

• Create a change log to show significant changes

• What section (Part A, B, C) and what was updated



Release of CADRes outside NASA Community is discouraged.

Discussions with General Counsel provided Clarification

• Although CADRes are not ITAR they do contain Proprietary Cost Data (Boeing, Lockheed,

Ball, Orbital). That is why release outside of NASA is not allowed.

• Release of CADRes to Universities is not permitted since they are primes themselves and

don’t have non-disclosure agreements in place.

• Release of CADRes to other Federal Gov’t Agencies is generally OK, although SID

discourages release of Pre-Launch CADRes because of their inherent sensitivity.

• Release of CADRes to other National Entities such as ESA and JAXA is not allowed.

• CADRes are not considered ITAR since CADRes don’t describe how to “make something”

or “how to operate” something.

NOTE: Sharing of CADRe Files not allowed. If someone wants a CADRe file, they need to get a ONCE

account.

28

Release of CADRes outside NASA



2016-2017 New Accomplishments



New Areas of Data Collection

30

Human Space Flight- EFT-1 Data Collection

Human Space Flight- Tier 2 International Space Station Projects

Balloons - Completed 2 missions from Applied Physics Laboratory

Aircraft- In process building CADRe for QueSST (Low Boom Aircraft Development)

Software Metrics- Continual work across all the projects worked



Completed a CADRe for the Exploration Flight Test (EFT-1) vehicle which was launched Dec 5, 2014. There is detailed non-recurring and recurring costs from Lockheed which will provide a wealth of information to help estimate follow-on systems.

Systems included on EFT-1 included • Parachute Recovery Systems• CM Structure integrity and performance• Heat Shield Performance • Electrical power storage and distribution;• Thermal control; cabin pressure control; • Command and data handling;• Communications and tracking;• Guidance, navigation and control; • Reaction control system propulsion• Flight software and computers

Systems Not included in EFT-1 (mass simulators)• Environmental control and life support system (ECLSS)• Crew support systems• Crew Displays• Crew seats and crew-operable hatches.

EFT-1 CADRe



CADRes on ISS Projects (Tier 2)

Common Communications for Visiting Vehicles (C2V2).The C2V2 provides both critical and non-critical RF communications withthe Visiting Vehicle (VV) during rendezvous, proximity, departure, and docking operations for crewed and uncrewed VVs

Nitrogen Oxygen Recharge System (NORS)• NORS is the new ISS Environmental Control and Life Support System

(ECLSS) subsystem to provide gaseous nitrogen (N2) and oxygen (O2) recharge to the ISS. Airlock N2 High Pressure Gas Tank (HPGT) re-pressurization Airlock O2 HPGT re-

pressurization

Gas ContentsOxygen: 6,000 PSINitrogen: 6,100 PSI



CADRes on Balloon Missions

• BOPPS Balloon. (Balloon Observation Platform for Planetary Science) SEPTEMBER 15, 2014

• Stabilized pointing platform mounting an 80-cm telescope on a gondola capable of operating at 110,000 to 140,000 feet, above most of the atmosphere's water and carbon dioxide.

– BOPPS can see wavelengths of light which are blocked by the atmosphere from reaching the ground.

– Designed to measure water and carbon dioxide from comets at infrared wavelengths in the 2.5 to 5 micron range, which cannot be seen from the ground because of atmospheric absorption.

Mass: 1856 kg

Completed 2 Balloon Mission CADRes Parts B and Part C. Focus was on collecting key Technical and Cost/Schedule information. • Development Cost Ranges $5M-$10M Development cost. • Launch & Operations $500K-$1.5M

Office of the


• CADRes on Balloon Missions

BRRISON Balloon The Balloon Rapid Response for ISON Studied the Comet ISON. Launched SEPTEMBER 29, 2013

• A helium-filled balloon with a gondola

• Includes telescope other equipment to near space, soaring up to 120,000 feet (36,576 meters) altitude

• BRRISON balloon's gondola carried infrared and near ultraviolet/visible imaging gear, along with fine steering mirror technology to obtain high pointing stability.

• Contains high technology infrared and visible light cameras. It demonstrated new developments in image stabilization.

• Launched from Fort Sumner, New Mexico and stayed aloft for only one day, just enough time to reveal information from comet ISON.

Mass: 1864 kg


https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/brrisonpayload.jpg



Successful CADRe kickoff the QueSST Low Boom Flight Demonstration Quiet Supersonic Transport• Demonstrate that noise from sonic booms can be reduced to a level acceptable to

the population residing under future supersonic flight paths.• Create a community response database that supports an International effort to

develop a noise based rule for supersonic overflight

CADRe on Supersonic Aircraft

Calculated loudness level (PLdB) of the predicted sonic boom

ground signature Less than 75



Initial Data collected by Space Vehicle(s) Collector's NameFull Name (of the

project mission)

Launch Date

(Date

Launch or

Launch Vehicle -

(Launch Vehicle

Type - DOD,

Mission Type

(Com, Sci, Tech,

Edu) --

Mission Objective

Procuring

Agency Type

- Civil,

Procuring AgencyDeveloper

TypeDeveloper COTS/In-House - HW; (BUS ONLY) COTS/In-House - FLIGHT SW

Developer

Country

Partners

(Commerial,

Universities,

Earth Orbiting

or "Planetary"

Development Time (mo) -

Phase B/C/D (From ATP

to Pre-Ship Review)

Mission

Duration:

Design

Mission

Successful

(Y/N), If

Source - Reference: website, document, etc… Additional Comments

% of labor

performed

by

Aerospace CINEMA (1) Mary Covert

CubeSat for Ions,

Neutrals, Electrons,

and Magnetic Field

9/13/2012

Atlas V

Part of NASA’s

ELaNa VI

initiative

Science Space Environment Civil NSF UniversityUC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory

(UCB/SSL)

USA

UK for

magnetometer

instrument

Imperial

College,

London,

provided the

EO

44

Start of Phase B through

PSR

12

Science

mission

began

about a

Unless otherwise noted, most info taken from

documents found in CINEMA knowledge tree available

at ftp://apollo.ssl.berkeley.edu/pub/cinema/. Key files

have been downloaded and archived.

50%

Aerospace Firefly (1)Eric Wendoloski /

Mary Covert11/20/13 Minotaur-1 Science Examine terrestrial gamma ray flashes from lightning Civil NSF Civil

NASA GSFC, with Siena College and

Hawk Institute for Space SciencesAlmost all-COTS bus United States

NASA/GSFC,

USRA, Siena

College, U. of

Maryland,

Hawk Institute

EO

During the time between

project start and launch,

we had about 36 months

of solid effort, with the

rest of the 60 month pre-

3 Y

Doug Rowland (NASA GSFC), http://firefly.siena-

space.org/,

https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-

missions/f/firefly,

http://firefly.gsfc.nasa.gov/Spacecraft/fireflymissionde.

“spacecraft still

communicating regularly with

ground station as of April 2016,

after more than 29 months on

orbit”

Aerospace KickSat (1) 4/18/14 Falcon-9 v1.1(R) Tech Demo ChipSat Deployment University Cornell University United States 4 24 Partial KickSat 1

KickSat worked on orbit, but a

faulty counter reset prevented

it from deploying the 104

"Sprites" prior to reentry.

Aerospace M-Cubed/COVE (1) 10/28/11 Tech Demo

Demonstrate a new FPGA-based image processing system intended for a

future NASA mission, Aerosol-Cloud-Ecosystem, recommended by the

Earth Science Decadal Survey

Civil NASA's Earth Science Technology Office UniversityUniversity of Michigan spacecraft, JPL

FPGA payloadUnited States 30 Partial

http://phys.org/news/2011-10-student-built-satellite-

nasa-instrument.html,


missions/m/m3-mcubed, http://umcubed.org/, "M-

Cubed: University of Michigan Multipurpose

MiniSatellite with Optical Imager Payload"

Spacecraft is alive and

transmitting, but can't be

commanded because it's

magnetically stuck to HRBE.

Aerospace NanoSail-D (2) 11/20/10 Tech Demo Demonstrate deployable sail Civil

Collaborative partnership between NASA; the

Department of Defense Space Test Program at

Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M.; and the Space and

Missile Defense Command, the Von Braun Center

for Science and Innovation, and Nexolve Corp.,

all in Huntsville; and NASA.

CivilNASA Marshall design and built; NASA

Ames did I&TUnited States 4 Y

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NanoSail-D2,

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/news/news/rel

eases/2011/11-055.html,

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/smallsats/nanosai

ld.html,

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/pdf/484314mai

n_NASAfactsNanoSail-D.pdf,

http://www.thevettebarn.com/forums/251718-

post1.html

Aerospace PharmaSat (1) 5/19/09 Science Study drug action in space Civil

The Exploration Technology Development

Program in NASA’s Exploration Systems Mission

Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington

funded the PharmaSat project

CivilSmall Spacecraft Division at NASA’s

Ames Research Center, Moffett FieldUnited States Y

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/smallsats/pharma

sat/main/index.html,

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/features/200

9/pharmasat-update_0612.html,

http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/331108main_pharmasat_Fac

t%20Sheet_FINAL.pdf

Aerospace PolySat (CP8) "IPEX" Mary CovertIntelligent Payload

Experiment12/5/13

Atlas V

ELaNa-2Tech Demo

JPL Autonomous Image Processing - validate onboard instrument

processing and autonomous payload operations for the proposed NASA

HYperSPectral Infra-Red Instrument

CivilFunded by NASA’s Earth Science Technology

Office (ESTO); managed by JPLUniversity

California Polytechnic University at San

Luis Obispo designed the spacecraft bus

(PolySat), cameras, attitude control,

flight avionics software, and

integrated/built the flight unit. Goddard

developed the Space Cube Mini payload

USAJPL (SW), GSFC

(PL processor)Earth Orbiting 24

Actual

mission

life was

14

months.

Last

Y

http://polysat.calpoly.edu/launched-missions/cp8-ipex/

and

http://mustangnews.net/polysat-testing-nasa-

technology/ and

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/cubesat/ipex.php and


SpaceCube Mini PL processor

was replaced late in the

development process with

"Gumstix" COTS processor

Aerospace PSSC-2 7/10/11 STS-135 Tech Demo

Two demos: Miniature Tracking Vehicle (MTV) will test the satellite's

ability to function as a reference body for tracking stations; and the

Compact Total Electron Content Sensor (CTECS) will observe the signals

from occulting Global Positioning System satellites in order to study the

density of the ionosphere. The latter is risk reduction for the upcoming

SMC Space Environmental Monitoring Nanosat Experiment (SENSE).

MilitarySpace and Missile Systems Center's Development

Planning Directorate (SMC/XR), Civil Aerospace United States 6

Partial - all

three

onboard

experiment

s provided

some data,

David Hinkely, Aerospace;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSSC-2,

http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/626635main_inspace-4-3-

hinkley.pdf,

http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Final_Nanosatellit

e_Launched_from_Space_Shuttle_Atlantis_999.html

Aerospace RAX 1 (USA 218)David Mayo / Mary

CovertRadio Aurora eXplorer 11/20/10

Minotaur-

IV/HAPS

Science

Used for true

science but also

pathfinder for

Space Weather

The primary scientific objective is to understand the microphysics of

plasma instabilities that lead to field-aligned irregularities (FAI) of

electron density in the polar lower ionosphere.

Civil NSF University University of Michigan United States

Collaboration

between a

space science

Principal

EO 12

Partial -

The RAX I

mission

was

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/spacewarn/spx685.html,


missions/r/rax,

https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_I

First National Science

Foundation sponsored CubeSat

mission

Aerospace SkyCubeDavid Mayo / Mary

CovertNanoRacks-SkyCube 1/9/14 Cygnus CRS-1 Educational

Educational mission that demonstrates the capabilities of small, low-

budget satellites in a manner that engages the public. The small satellite

takes images of the Earth from space by request, sends "tweets" in the

form of radio pings, and inflates a balloon to de-orbit itself in a

Crowdsourced Commercial Southern Stars Group LLC United States

Naval

Postgraduate

School -

ground

EO 24 3

Partial -

Initial

signals

were

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/880837561/skyc

ube-the-first-satellite-launched-by-you/posts/985395,

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/880837561/skyc

ube-the-first-satellite-launched-by-you/posts/824992,

SkyCube contains no onboard

guidance or active attitude

control system. Instead, the

satellite has a passive

0

ARC O/OREOS

Organism/Organic

Exposure to Orbital

Stresses

5/19/09Minotaur 4 (HAPS

stage 5)Science Plant cell gravity senseing; Study drag action in space Civil NASA HQ (SMD) and ARC Civil SSTP - NASA ARC 100% IH 100% IH United States

Santa Clara

University -

Mission Ops

Earth Orbiting 12~18-24

months

Yes -

Nominal

PM: Elwood Agasid

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/smallsats/pharma

sat/main/index.html,

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/features/200

None 0

SporeSat-1 SporeSat-1 4/18/14 Space X- CRS 3 Tech Demo Variable-g centrifuge Civil NASA ARC Civil SSTP - NASA ARC 50% COTS; 50% IH 100% IH United States

Santa Clara

University -

Mission Ops;

Purdue

Earth Orbiting 36 2 months

Yes-Partial

(centrifuge

success)

SE: Brittany; PM: Dan Launch Delay ~1 month5% from

SCU (Radio)

ARC EDSN EDSN 11/3/15DOD Launch

Vehicle

Communication,

Technology

Demonstration,

Networking,

Swarm Mission, Enable Cross-Link Communication and Multipoint

PhysicsCivil NASA ARC Civil SSTP - NASA ARC 75% IH; 25%COTS 100% IH United States

Montana Sate

University -

Payloads;

Santa Clara

Earth Orbiting 10

2 months;

design to

last 24

months.

No -

Launch

Vehicle

Failed

PM, Publications None ~5%

JPL GRIFEX Mrozinski

GEO-CAPE Readout

Integrated Circuit In-

Flight Performance

Experiment

1/31/15 Delta II Tech

The GEO-CAPE ROIC In-Flight Performance Experiment (GRIFEX) is a 3U

CubeSat that will perform engineering assessment of a JPL-developed all

digital in-pixel high frame rate Read-Out Integrated Circuit (ROIC). Its

high throughput capacity will enable the proposed Geostationary

Civil NASA

JPL/Universti

y of

Michigan

JPL/Universtiy of Michigan USA Earth Orbiting LV

JPL MarCO Michael DiNicola Mars Cube One May-18 Atlas V-401 Tech/Com

The twin communications-relay CubeSats, being built by NASA's Jet

Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, constitute a technology

demonstration called Mars Cube One (MarCO). CubeSats are a class of

spacecraft based on a standardized small size and modular use of off-

the-shelf technologies. Many have been made by university students,

and dozens have been launched into Earth orbit using extra payload

Civil NASA JPL

JPL; Project Mgmt, SE, SMA, Mission

Design, Spacecraft Structure, MGA, LGA,

X-band Transponder, SSPA & LNA, High

Gain Reflectarray, UHF Antenna and

Thermal and Harness.

USA

AstroDev, LLC

(C&DH board,

Electrical

Power

System), MMA,

LLC (solar

Planetary 21 6.5 0

marco_de_exp type dec 2015_Miked.xlsx (initial cost

data from the JPL financial system); MarCO_ CubeSats

to Mars in 2016.pdf (for technical data)

3/2/2016, M. DiNicola:

- Costs shown are for Phases

B/C/D only; operations' costs

not included.

- MarCO costs were funded by

internal JPL B&P money. If

JPL LMRST MrozinskiLow Mass Radio

Science Transponder10/8/15 Atlas V Tech/Com

CubeSats leaving the vicinity of Earth would not have access to GPS or

other forms of terrestrial navigation. The Low Mass Radio Science

Transponder (LMRST) is a bare-bones, two-way Doppler and ranging

transponder, based on well established navigation techniques in use by

Civil NASA JPL JPL USA Stanford Earth Orbiting Outlier NMass: http://www.space.com/30768-spy-satellite-

cubesat-launch-thursday-webcast.html

Had to build their own ground

station.

JPL M-Cubed/COVE 2 Mrozinski 6-Dec-13

JPL RACE

Radoimeter

Atmospheric CubeSat

Experiment

10/28/2014

Orbital Sciences

Corp. Antares

rocket

Tech

The primary scientific expedition of RACE is to measure the liquid water

path and precipitable water vapor that is pertinent to the water cycle

and Earth energy budget. The RACE payload is a microwave radiometer

that primarily observes the 183 GHz water vapor line.

Civil NASA JPL JPL USA LV

CubeSat Data Collection

2016-2017 Completed First Round of CubeSat Data Collection- Data Collection only

COMPACT Research Projects with JPL, ARC, and Aerospace. CubeSat Research Task (COMPACT) coordinated to get a team updates from JPL, ARC, and Aerospace to assess progress of data collection.

• Focused the team on the identification of various CubeSat missions and transitioned into full data collection which is the primary focus for this task.

• Reached out to APL to include CubeSat Preliminary with a dozen CubeSat projects having data.

2018 Small Amount of Research Funds targeted for second round of CubeSat Data and earlyModel Development



• FSW data collection continues to be challenging– Completeness metrics for CADRe’s are comparable across

Centers

• HQ is leading Joint effort to improve & refine– Including GSFC with JPL, APL, and ARC team

• Updated CADRe template is focused on key sizing data– Software sizing parameters highest priority for data collection

• Working with GSFC to help implement capture of SW metrics– Provide feedback on model prototype and data analysis

Flight Software Data Collection



New Initiatives



CADRe Forward Work 2018

• SMD Mars2020, Europa, Juno, JWST, LANDSAT-9, WFIRST, RBI, TESS, SPP, SWOT, INSIGHT, OCO-III, PSYCHE

MAIA, ECOSTRESS, GOLD, JPSS-2, GOES-S, TSIS, ICON, GPIM

• ARMD– QueSST PDR CADRe in process, CDR CADRe planned after competition results

• STMD– iSAT (CubeSat Project)

– Restore-L

– DSOC

– GPIM

• ESMD– ORION (Orion Actuals)

– SLS BLK1-B

– GSDO

• ISS SPECIFIC – Lithium Ion Battery

– NASA Docking System



CADRe Forward Work

Part A: For LAUNCH CADRE addition of an Executive Summary

• An idea has been floated by SID Management to have a CADRe executive summary after the project is completed. Suggestion submitted by SMD as well.

• A summary of all the Section A.5 sections. Add new material as necessary, inputs collected from many sources inside/outside SID.

• Focus on capturing in a summary write-up the technical changes, schedule adjustments and cost adjustments over the life of the project.

Part C: Focus on collecting PRIME WYEs

• While NASA is doing a better job capturing Project Civil Servants (FTEs) and project Support Contractors (WYEs) FTEs.

• NASA has difficulty capturing the PRIME WYEs.

• NASA CIPT: Working though ideas from the group, including Primes, who can help NASA better capture WYEs.



Questions

Office of the



How are CADRes Prepared?

Source Documents for CADRe

Part A. Descriptive Information -Project Plan

-Architecture Description Document -Acquisition Plan -Project Implementation Plan -System Engineering Plan -Risk Mitigation Plan -Integrated Design Definition Documents (Constellation) -Milestone Review Briefing Packages (SDR, PDR, CDR etc) -Concept Study Report/Proposal (if applicable)

-Concept of Operations -Integrated Master Schedule -Integrated Test Plan -Monthly Status Reports -Any Instrument specific MDR, CDR, PDR packages -ATLO Plan (used later in the project) -Mission Readiness Review (used later in the project) -Pre Environmental Readiness Review (used later in the project) -Launch Readiness Review (used later in the project)

Part B. Technical Data -Master Equipment Lists -Project Schedules -Mass Property Reports -Power Budget Summary Report -Software Design Reports -Milestone Briefing Packages/Documentation (MD

Part C. Cost and Schedule Info

-Project Cost Estimate by WBS

-WBS Dictionary

-533 or EVM reports

-Schedules

-Risk lists

Amount of documentation varies with

Size, Class, Category Project

CADRe Update for 2017 Cost and Schedule Symposium Eric … · 2018-05-04 · Office of the Chief...

Documents

Transcript of CADRe Update for 2017 Cost and Schedule Symposium Eric … · 2018-05-04 · Office of the Chief...