Business Ethics Final PPT

download Business Ethics Final PPT

of 25

Transcript of Business Ethics Final PPT

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    1/25

    Submiited by:

    Deepika Bangwal D-10

    Sachin Yadav D-11

    Sooraj Nair D- 14

    Zia Ansari D-37

    Sachin Nikam D- 38

    K Sunit D- 46

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    2/25

    What is justice

    Protection of the innocent

    Punishment of the guilty

    Satisfactory resolution of disputes

    Most importantly delivery of justice on

    time is crucial for litigants

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    3/25

    Massive scams Robbery

    Extortion

    Murders in broaddaylight

    Rape

    Election booth rigging

    through muscle power

    Each of these is possible continuously and blatantly only due toone reason

    THE PARALYZED JUDICIARY OF OUR COUNTRY

    By the time justice is done either the person

    fighting is killed or dies naturally

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    4/25

    Pendency of Litigation in India

    Justice is not only blind but too lame as

    well

    Handicapped by

    inadequate funds

    budgetary allocations for law and justice not

    being part of the plan expenditure

    shortage of resources shortage of staff and infrastructure

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    5/25

    Causes

    Inadequate number of Courts

    Courts Inadequate number of judicial officers

    Judicial officers not fully equipped to tackle

    cases involving specialized knowledge Dilatory tactics by the litigants and their

    lawyers who seek frequent adjournments anddelay in filing documents

    Role of administrative staff of the CourtCorruption

    Red Tapism

    Judicial corruption

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    6/25

    CURRENT SCENARIO

    Over three million cases are pending inIndia's 21 high courts, and an

    astounding 26.3 million cases arepending in subordinate courts across thecountry.

    Cases filed per 1000 is 1.2 in India farlesser than 17 in Malaysia and 14 inKorea

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    7/25

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5

    5 4.6

    4.13.9

    1.9

    1.2 1.06 1.05 1 0.9

    Pending Cases In subordinate courts in millions

    Pending Cases

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    8/25

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    Bihar Punjab Uttar

    Pradesh

    Delhi

    628

    334

    212

    344

    Prisoners Kept under-Trial for over five years cases

    Under-Trial Cases

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    9/25

    Impact of delay

    There are three enemies of the administration of

    justice: uncertainty, delay and costs

    Uncertainty and delay both create a feeling of

    confusion and uneasiness in the minds of thelitigants

    Speedy trial is the essence of criminal justice and

    there can be no doubt that delays in trial by itselfconstitutes denial of justice

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    10/25

    Impact of delay

    Delays in courtrooms lead to corruption in

    government; lack of investment in vital economicspheres due to uncertain contract enforcement;

    higher transaction costs and a generalinflationary bias

    The justice has become costlier, in terms of time

    and money. Since the citizens are unable to apply

    costly lubrication to the parts of mechanismattached to the system, their work is delayed and

    justice goes out of their reach

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    11/25

    Continued....

    Delay is eating up 2 percent of the GDP on an

    average especially creating a hostile environment for

    investment

    Financial investors investing in India has a "legal risk

    premium" which is an additional cost involved for

    investment due to the weak legal system A report of World banks ranks India last among 184

    economies, in terms of enforceability of contracts

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    12/25

    Indian case

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    13/25

    Uphaar Cinema case

    Occurred on Friday, June 13, 1997 at

    Uphaar Cinema Green Park Delhi

    59 people died, mostly due to suffocation,

    and 103 were seriously injured in theresulting stampede

    Case filed by The Association of Victims of

    Uphaar Fire Tragedy' (AVUT) and won Rs25 crore as compensation

    However the Supreme Court on 13/10/2011,

    nearly halved the sum of compensation

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    14/25

    Almost nine years after the tragedy, a trial courtjudge visited the Uphaar cinema hall in August,

    2006, accompanied by CBI officials whoinvestigated the case to get a first hand look atthe seating and fire safety arrangements, whichhave been blamed for the tragedy

    The Supreme Court on October 13 2011reduced the amount of compensation to be paidto the victims of 1997 Uphaar Cinema firetragedy. The compensation to family of

    deceased above 20 yrs cut from Rs 18 lakh toRs 10 lakh each; for those below 20 yrs, fromRs 15 lakh to Rs 7.5 lakh.

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    15/25

    Cases

    Shocking to observe that it took six years to

    establish that the 59 people died because of

    criminal negligence on the part of the cinema

    management and the Delhi government.

    It was clear from day one that nobody would have

    died had proprietors of the cinema hall followed

    safety rules

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    16/25

    Harshad Mehta Scam

    Harshad Shantilal Mehta was an Indian stockbrokercharged with numerous financial crimes that took placein 1992.

    Of the 27 criminal charges brought against him, hewas only convicted of one, before his death at age 48

    in 2001. It was alleged that Mehta engaged in a massive stock

    manipulation scheme financed by worthless bankreceipts, which his firm brokered in "ready forward"transactions between banks.

    Mehta was convicted by the Bombay High Courtand Supreme Court of India for his part in a financialscandal valued at 5,000 crore which took place onthe Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE).

    He was tried for 9 years, until he died in the late 2001

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    17/25

    Bhopal Gas Tragedy(1984)

    Bhopal gas Leak disaster, which took a toll of

    15000 people. Twenty eight years have passed

    to that ghastly incident; still now victims were

    fighting for its compensation, which fails to

    measure up the damage caused to them.

    In 2010 Chief judicial magistrate Mohan P Tiwari

    pronounced the verdict in a packed court roomconvicting 85-year-old Mahindra, and seven

    others in the case relating to leakage of deadly

    methyl isocyanate gas

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    18/25

    They were held guilty under Sections 304-A

    (causing death by negligence), 336, 337 and

    338 (gross negligence) of the Indian PenalCode.

    However, there was no word on Warren

    Anderson, the then chairman of UnionCarbide Corporation of the US, who was

    declared an absconder after he did not not

    subject himself to trial in the case that began

    23 years ago.

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    19/25

    Ruchika Girhotra

    Molestation of a 14 year girl by a top cop

    After she made a complaint, the victim, her family, and herfriends were systematically harassed by the police leading toher eventual suicide

    After 19 years, the criminal has been found guilty but all he gotas punishment was 6 months in prison and a meager sum of1000 Rs

    However, the accused in this

    case got away on bail

    by paying a few thousands,hereby making a mockery of

    the justice

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    20/25

    Nitish katara was a 24 year old Indian business

    executive in Delhi, who was murdered on Feb,17,2002,

    by Vikas Yadav son of influential criminal-politician D. P.

    Yadav He had fallen in love with Bharti Yadav, sister of Vikas

    Yadav, Nitishs murder was an honor killing because the

    family did not approve the relationship

    Received threats several times

    Finally, Vikas and Vishal Yadav were later found guilty by

    the trial Court and awarded life sentence on 30 May

    2008.

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    21/25

    All these cases shows the real picture how politics,

    hierarchy in the system, money and muscle power

    influence the cases and thus resulting into delay or

    denial The accused party with its influence tries to eradicate

    all evidences of witnesses

    It takes decades to get justice, that too under

    pressure of people outrage, media

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    22/25

    Law in other

    countries

    In United States, also speedy trial is one of the

    constitutionally assured rights

    In developed countries like US, for petty cases,

    people filing cases in the morning get justice literallyby the evening

    European Convention on Human Rights too provides

    that everyone arrested or detained shall be entitled

    to trial within reasonable time

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    23/25

    REMEDIES

    Fast Track Courts

    Mobile Courts

    Lok Adalats

    Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

    Setting up of e-committee Setting up of GramNyayalayas

    Declaration of Assets by Judges

    Periodical Performance Evaluation and

    Removal of Judges and officers of DoubtfulIntegrity

    Tightening the Selection Procedure ofSuperior Court Justices

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    24/25

    Indian law system that is been inherited from British

    rulers, has grown of ages and needs modification tosuit our needs and convenience

    The modifications should aim at shortening theperiod of proceedings of the court

    Amendment in the rules and regulations governing

    court proceedings and simplification of the

    procedures computerization of the whole country's judicial

    system is the need of the hour

  • 7/29/2019 Business Ethics Final PPT

    25/25