Brief History of Citizenship

8/3/2019 Brief History of Citizenship

1/27

Are you a state sovereign freeman or

A UNITED STATES Citizen?

David A. DarbyFebruary 2010 A.D.

This is a question very few Americans have asked themselves. The

reason being, they do not know that there is a question to be asked. I

will attempt to give you a brief description of each. Then, you will have

the information available to ask your self that question.

Point to remember as you read. All government documents that are

signed by individuals are contracts between that individual and the

government. Even by answering to your name in an official situation

will seal a verbal contract. You have to be very careful as to how you

answer a question from any government official. That is the one point

that you will see through out this paper many times. Once you get that

imprinted into your mind; everything else will fall into place.

Contracts with the government will remove you farther and farther

from your original status of a sovereign born natural person.

You need to understand that the day you were delivered from yourmothers womb in this country, you were a sovereign born freeman.

(freeman refers to both genders). But, you are enticed to sign contracts

with both the state and federal governments with the promise of benefits

from the programs that the state and fed government has set up to keep

you signing these contracts. All of us are originally born a natural

sovereign freeman. As soon as you sign the Social Security SS-5 form,

you start your very own trust account in the Corporation of the

UNITED STATES. This is where you officially separate your self from

your original status as sovereign born freeman. Each time you sign for

a license or permit, you are signing a contract to do whatever the state

or federal government tells you to do.

The government is now assigning the social security number in the

hospital at the time of birth of a natural freeman, hoping to get them

1


2/27

into the system as early as possible. You see even today babies are

originally born freeman.

Point to remember, there is no law that forces you to get or give the SS

number except to the Social Security administration. The only laws on

the books concerning Social Security numbers, forces the companies to

ask you for it. All of this is covered in the Privacy Act of 1974. After

that date no law could be passed to compel you to give your social

security number for any reason other than Social Security. The

government knows this, so they skirt the issue and go after your SS

number in a round about way by forcing employers to basically force

you to give it to work. Again all you have to do is stand up to the

employer and tell him that you will not comply. At that point, if he

continues to force you to give a SS number, you can take him to court

and force him under the threat of summary judgment to do whateveryou were asking. What the employers do not understand is that the

1974 Privacy Act gives you the power to take any government

organization or private company to court with a stipulated summary

judgment attached if it is proved that they violated the Privacy Act.

The one drawback of the Constitution for the United States is the ability

of federal government to contract with the people. In a perfect world

this would work just fine. But, in our world, unscrupulous government

officials have formulated contracts under statute law to take away your

freedom since the 1860s. Unfortunately, there have always been

unscrupulous people that have worked against the sovereign people of

the United States. Therefore, contracts were devised to actually take

away our sovereign rights.

You need to understand, that we in this country are the only people in

the world that were originally given sovereign rights. That is why

others in the United States and Europe have been working to

undermine our status. Once our sovereign status is removed we all

become slaves to the government, so that a new world order or oneworld government can eventually be implemented. A New World Order

could never be implemented if a part of the world had a higher status

than the other people around the world? The problem that the one

worlders have, is that they have is to keep our status hidden until they

implement the one world government. If you remember, Bush 41

slipped and talked about it during his presidency.

2


3/27

Another important fact to remember, when reading a government

document, especially if it is a legal document; you have to know the

meaning of the words being used. The accepted meaning is not always

the same as what is being used in contracts and legal documents. I use a

4th edition Blacks law dictionary to define the terminology, if the

meaning of the words have not been explained in the body of the

document that I am reading. This is very important! It can give you a

false sense of security. You may think it says one thing but because of

the different meanings of words in law it may mean something

entirely different. These documents once signed by the individual help

take away your god given sovereign rights.

For instance the word person, the normal use of the word is individual,

people etc. But, in government documents it means citizen of theUNITED STATES corporation. Most of us never even think of this

when reading a government document. The reason they have redefined

the word person is to make you think they (the government) are talking

about a sovereign individual. This gives you the feeling that you are

free, but in reality you have become a slave to the corporate state.

At the end of the Revolutionary War it was recognized that We the

People (each individual) was a sovereign. Notice that no constitution

[state or federal] has ever provided the people with any rights. The

people possessed these rights before the Constitution was formed.

Therefore, all constitutions (contracts with the people) state the limits of

government control of the people. In fact it was the existence and

recognition of these rights that gave the people the authority to form a

constitution [state and federal]. The existence and recognition of

preexisting rights can be can be found in The Magna Carta (June 15,

1215); The Declaration of Rights in Congress, at New York (October 19,

1765); the Declaration of Rights in Congress, at Philadelphia (October

14, 1774); the Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776); the Articles of

confederation (November 15, 1777); the Treaty of Paris 1783, theConstitution for the United States of America 1787, and the Bill of

Rights inclusive of the 9th and 10th Amendments (December 15, 1791,

etc. Throughout these documents, it can be seen that the people are not

subservient to the government but rather that the government it

subservient to the people.

3


4/27

Think about this for just a second. Do you feel that the government is

subservient to you, or is it the other way around? Today it is just the

opposite of what our forefathers fought and died for. They fought to

give us all sovereign freedom. Instead our government has given us

government slavery. You see the definition of freedom is the

jurisdiction of common law and title to ones land. We have lost both.

The 1787 Constitution for the United States, one of the most powerful

and revered documents ever conceived in the history of mankind was

conceived by passionate, god fearing and dedicated men of their time.

It forms the basis of the ultimate contract with the people, and gives all

of us that live legally with-in the boundary of the present UNITED

STATES the rules that limit government. You must understand that

the Constitution is a contract with the people. Our rights as free

citizens are enumerated in that document. Not governmental rights, butindividual sovereign rights. That is why there is no such thing as an

evolving constitution. It is a contract with the American people and can

only be changed one way. Amendments. That is the basis of contract

law. The contract is binding and cannot be changed unless all parties

agree to the form. But, even amendments cannot over come the Treaty

of Paris 1783. You see treaties are even above the constitution.

Therefore, even if they enact an amendment that is contrary to the

Treaty of Paris, it does not apply to the sovereign freeman,

Unfortunately, we have all signed government contracts that make us

corporate US citizens; at this point the organic constitution means

nothing to the UNITED STATES citizen. As a corporate UNITED

STATES citizen you are a fictious person, part of the fictious

corporation. Natural freemen cannot be a part of the corporation. The

corporation has to change your status before you can belong. I will

discuss this a little later.

The document that no one ever talks about is the first document that

officially mentioned sovereign rights and actually gave all residents ofthe several states sovereign rights. The first document that we should

be holding above all others is the Treaty of Paris 1783 A.D. That one

document was a contract that the King of England signed with all in

America and gave all citizens of the several states, sovereign state

citizenship. With-in the body of this document all citizens of the

separate states were given sovereign citizenship in their respective

4


5/27

states, not UNITED STATES Citizenship. At that time, the states were

considered little countries that formed a union of the several states to

become the United States.

In 1783 the treaty of Paris which ended the revolutionary war gave

sovereignty to the original 13 colonies or states. When looking in Blacks

law to define word state, we find that the very first definition defines

state as all of the people within the boundary of a defined area in the

state. Therefore, by definition the state cannot have sovereign status

unless all the people have sovereign status. We hear the state officials

talk about the sovereignty of the state, but never the sovereignty of the

people. Therefore it stands to reason there is no sovereign state if the

people are not sovereign, because the people are the state.

The law defines a Sovereign as an individual, body, or state in whichindependent and supreme authority is vested; a chief ruler with

supreme power; a king or other ruler with limited power.

The Constitution for the United States is very specific about the power

of the United States government. Our fore fathers were afraid of a

strong central government. (In fact if you are really interested, get a

copy of the Anti-Federalist papers. You probably have never heard

about that book.) That is why the United States Constitution made sure

that the central government had specific duties leaving the states with

all of the power. The US Constitution states that the central United

States government is limited in power to the boundaries of Washington

D.C., the protectorates, and the military bases. Only the separate states

had the power over the common laws that govern the people of the

separate states. The sovereignty of the individual was to be protected

by all laws that were enacted by the several states. The United States

had no citizens when it was first formed. All citizens were state citizens

or freemen. There was no such entity known as a United States Citizen.

Each sovereign individual was expected to conduct his or her life underthe common law. Common law is not a forgiving law, but can only take

action when another party is harmed. Essentially, it is a law that

concerns the liability of the individual. Therefore, under common law,

no laws can be passed to force a state freeman to do anything. Laws can

only be passed to give out punishment for an action that has harmed

another. Common law is the law of liability.

5


6/27

This system worked well until the civil war between the states. We must

understand that the popular belief that the civil war was fought only

because of slavery is another myth. It was a component, but the main

reason was states rights and the right for the state to secede from the

Union. There is nothing in the constitution that mandates that the

states have to stay in the union. Lincoln and the northern states decided

that the southern states did not have states rights and forced them to

stay in the union. Thus, the north caused the war of session (civil War).

Too this day the Federal government keeps downplaying states rights.

The south had the courage to fight for their belief in the states right

and self determination or sovereignty. What makes up the state? The

people are the state. So, when you speak of states rights, you are talking

about our rights (Sovereign rights).

When the civil war began, President Lincoln declared marshal law;

which he had the right and power to do during emergencies as president

of the Union of the United States. President Lincoln, as we all know,

was assassinated before he could petition congress to officially end the

civil war and put the country back on a common law footing. You see,

President Lincoln issued a proclamation to end hostilities, but only

congress had the power to end the war. Therefore, we are technically

still on a war footing and still under marshal law. That is why the

government is still using statute law. It is the only way that the

government can control the people, even though our forefathers fought

a war to end once and for all the complete control of the people by the

government. Our government has conspired since the conception of the

United States of America to control the people. Through contracts, they

have achieved complete control. Now it is time to take back our

freedom.

Congress saw a way to take away some of our freedoms and wield the

power of the US government over all of us by remaining on civil war

footing and never removing marshal law. Andrew Johnson succeededLincoln and did nothing to change the war footing. Then, Ulysses S.

Grant general of the northern armys became president. He had always

operated under military law, which is another form of admiralty law

and saw no reason to change. Therefore, the country to this day is still

under marshal law or better known as admiralty law. (Law of the Seas,

statute law, or private law). Essentially the Civil War was instrumental

6


7/27

in taking away a major part of our freedoms. With civil law or statute

law, statutes can be enacted to force you to do things that the common

law would never allow to happen. Just think about how free we would

be without the statues to force us to do things. At first it seemed

reasonable to have all these laws that tell us what we can do and what

we cannot do. But, if you look at the laws today there are laws

concerning everything we do. You see common law achieves the same

thing in a little different way. If you hurt someone, no matter what it is

you will be held liable in a common law court. The jury of your peers

who know you will decide on your punishment. There are no appeals

that go on and on for years.

As I have studied history over the last 30 years, I have come to the

conclusion that President Lincoln was assassinated because the civil war

was over. Foreign interests and our own crooked politicians conspiredto kill Lincoln to keep statute law in place. This would provide more

control of the people and more power into the hands of the United

States government. In statute law, laws can be passed that force a

certain behavior. That is what we see today in the environmental

movement and many other movements that seek to take more and more

of our freedoms and rights. What almost all people do not understand

is that the sovereign freeman is not under the jurisdiction of statute law.

Common law is referred to as public law and statute law is referred to

as private law. Admiralty law (statute law) was developed by the

insurance companies that insured ships of the sea, therefore private law.

Now you can see when and how private law actually has taken

precedence over the common law as the law of the United States. The

UNITED STATES Government could not control our daily lives until

Common Law was superseded by Admiralty law. I reiterate, the

common law was superseded, not removed. It is still the basis of the

statutes, but is not available to the UNITED STATES citizen.

Government now had a tool to force people to do what it wanted byoutlawing many of the rights that we enjoyed up until the Civil War.

You have to remember that this was all done piecemeal. No one really

noticed that we had lost our sovereignty, and now we are slowly being

conditioned to accept unconstitutional laws so that the masses can be

controlled. Again you have to remember, we are now a corporation not

a free society. You are now a trust account in the largest corporation in

7


8/27

the world. You now only get the rights that the government wants to

give you.

We must reitterate this distinction right now. A sovereign state citizen

embraces Common Law or public law. The sovereign citizen is not

subject to the laws that are private in nature or admiralty laws. All

statutes that are passed by government, forcing someone to act in a

certain manner are admiralty in nature or private law. Now you are

beginning to see why it is relevant to understand the status of a

sovereign freeman. You see a statute law can force behavior. Common

law will only take charge when you have hurt another party. When a

party is hurt, it is the jury that decides the punishment, not the judge.

That is why we hear of the practice of a jury of ones peers. The result

is similar, but with common law we still retain our independence and

freedom. Statute law takes all of that away from the UNITED STATEScitizen. In a statute court the Judge has all the power not the jury, as it

once was. The jury in a common law court has the power to make a

determination of the validity of the law in question, before it provides a

verdict in the case at hand. Can you imagine how a judge in a statute or

Admiralty court would react, if the jury struck down the law as

unconstitutional, which was being used to convict someone?

When was the last time you heard the term sovereign citizen or

sovereign freeman. You hear about the sovereignty of the nation, but

not the sovereignty of the citizen. Under the constitution there can be

no sovereign nation unless the people are sovereign. That is because

sovereignty of the citizen has been stolen from us. We are now

considered Corporate UNITED STATES Citizens through contract

with the government.

How was this perpetrated on the country? You have to go back to the

end of the civil war. The newly freed slaves having been property and

having no legal status at all within the country had to be given some

type of status. The United States with the help of unscrupulouspoliticians decided to use the emergency of the Civil War to usurp the

constitution by extending United States citizenship to the freed slaves

through the enactment of the 14th amendment. (Read the 14th

amendment.) To paraphrase the 14th amendment; it refers to all

persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the

jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States; nor shall any state

8


9/27

deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of

law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection

of the laws. Therefore, the full benefits of the original constitution do

not apply to the 14th amendment citizen.

The Treaty of Paris and the Constitution are both color blind. It says

nothing of race in either document. You see the newly freed slave was

actually automatically a freeman or sovereign citizen when he/she was

freed, but the politicians could not let that stand. They decided that

keeping statute law in place would give more control over the ex slave

and therefore all of us. They passed into law a lesser citizenship, which

was increased to include all born in the UNITED STATES. Therefore,

the UNITED STATES government could have just as easily made the

ex-slaves state sovereign citizens with all the rights that this bestows.

Again it was not the intention of the US government to do anything butenslave all of us into federalism without our knowledge. Even today

they give lip service to our freedom, but we know only what has been

taught to us in the government schools. If each and every one of us did

some studying of our past, we would find that the US citizen is a true

slave, with a few more rights than the plantation slave in the feudal

system of the old south. Even though the yoke is light, it is still a yoke.

We have to get permission from government for anything we do as a

government slave. As a Freeman, you do not have to ask the

government for permission for anything.

Until the War of Northern aggression started there were sovereign

black citizens. So, my final question on this subject, Why did the

politicians take away all opportunity for the ex slave to get freeman

status?

One needs to remember that the United States government under the

original constitution had control only in the area of the District of

Columbia and all of the protectorates. By extending United States

citizenship to the newly freed slaves, they officially became citizens ofthe District of Columbia, which was a way to extend US governmental

control from the District of Columbia to include the rest of the country.

Therefore, unwittingly the newly freed slaves became the first United

States Citizens. Of course, the freed ex-slaves, having no previous status

embraced this concept wholeheartedly. They knew nothing of state

citizenship or what it meant. All that was important to them was

9


10/27

getting recognized as a legal citizen and not property. This was the

beginning of the end of the freeman in the United States.

This was all concealed within the 14th amendment to the constitution. If

you read the constitution it states that the United States government

only has jurisdiction in the District of Columbia, the protectorates and

military bases. By enacting the 14th amendment, the reach of the federal

government now extended into the states through its new citizens, the

freed slaves and everyone else that was born or naturalized into the

United States.

We have believed that the 14th amendment was written for the ex slaves.

When you read it with the slaves in mind that will be your conclusion,

but if you read the words carefully; you will see that it is actuallyencompassing all citizens of the country. At that time in history, no one

thought anything about it. The ex slaves had to have some type of status

within the country. Everyone agreed to that. The problem being, that

no one sat down and thought through the argument of States

citizenship Vs United States citizenship. The ultimate goal of the

government was to use the national emergency to replace the plantation

of the ex-slaves with the government plantation and the total

enslavement of the former free persons. The freemen of the country felt

good that we had ended slavery for all time, when in fact the whole

population was enslaved by the government.

By the middle of the 20th century we were all considered UNITED

STATES citizens. Real Freedom is now just a fleeting memory that we

all mistakenly cling to. Between the 14th amendment and statute law the

corporate UNITED STATES government has usurped the freemans

freedom and the ex-slave merely exchanged one slave master for

another. If the government had wanted us to keep our sovereign

citizenship, they would have encouraged the individual states to extend

sovereign state citizenship to the newly freed citizens. But, this was notthe case. In fact I have not found anywhere that they even discussed

this remedy. So, looking back at what has occurred, it looks to me as if

this was the first step in enslaving all of the people of America into a

European style feudal system. This is the only way that we the people

can be controlled by a central government. Exactly what our own

forefathers feared most.

10


11/27

If the government had wanted us to keep our sovereign citizenship, they

would have encouraged the individual states to extend sovereign state

citizenship to the newly freed slaves. But, this did not happen. In fact I

have not found anywhere that they even discussed this remedy. So,

looking back at what has happened, it looks to me as if this was the first

step in enslaving all of the people of America.

The Citizen of the United States in Article II of the United States

constitution is not the same a citizen of the United States in the 14th

amendment to the constitution. The Citizen with the capitalized C

is a class of Citizens. The lower case c citizen applies to one of

the people that has standing, i.e. a party to the contract of the

constitution with the people with Privileges and Immunities. The

14th amendment citizen of the United States does not have full access tothe bill of rights. If you look up Wolf v. People of the State of

Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1948) talking about only the Bill of Rights to the

constitution of 1-8 being estopped which was over ruled by Mapp v.,

Ohio 367, (1961) and this decision has now been limited. Are you now

impressed that in a State criminal forum you now have limited access to

the Bill of Rights 1-8 no 9 and 10 by year 1961 and since limited.

Now we jump in time to the early 1900s for the next big power grab by

the UNITED STATES Government. The 16th amendment (Income Tax)

was ratified February 3, 1913. By that time a few generations had

passed away. Legally, state sovereign citizens cannot be taxed on their

labor, but this was the first step to codify the tax and ultimately tax us

all into poverty. All education about state citizenship had been

completely dropped from the schools after the civil war. The only

citizenship that was now available to be learned about is UNITED

STATES Citizenship. This was a concerted effort on behalf of the

government to conceal our true nature. Shortly after the Income tax

amendment, the Federal Reserve act was passed that gave away the

countrys control of the monetary system to foreign bankers. Ourforefathers explicitly told us to never let the banks control the monetary

system. We traded our real currency (gold) for a credit system. In a

credit system the banks can print whatever amount of paper money

they wish.

11


12/27

We see that today. The Federal Reserve just prints more money when

the government wants to borrow more. We cannot even ask for an

audit of the Federal Reserve. You see the Federal reserve is not a

government bank, it is owned by foreign and domestic bankers.

Therefore, when the government borrows money the Federal reserve

charges the government interest on that loan. We the people cannot

even find out what that interest actually is.

The evil politicians went one better, they turned our monetary system

over to foreign banks. The Federal Reserve, even though it is called the

Federal Reserve, is not part of the UNITED STATES government. It is

wholly owned by European and American Bankers with a little

oversight by the US government to make us servants think that it is part

of our government. The internal revenue became the collections arm of

the Federal Reserve. The internal revenue is also not part of theUNITED STATES government. That has been proven in many court

cases when the UNITED STATES government separates itself from

some of the illegal practices of the Internal Revenue service.

The 16th amendment could not have been put into affect without statute

law and the 14th amendment being in place. At this point there is no

mention of sovereign state citizens. All are now UNITED STATES

citizens. That is why the income tax code can only be applied to

UNITED STATES citizens. The UNITED STATES government still

had to follow the original law; but by concealing our true identity and

forcing us to sign statute contracts that took away our sovereign rights,

they have stolen the remembrance of our original sovereignty. Many

have fought the IRS as UNITED STATES citizens and they will loose

every time. They do not comprehend the real reasons why we are

paying unconstitutional taxes. CONTRACTS!

So, at this point in our history they have only concealed our citizenship.

Everyone in the United States is technically still sovereign citizens, but

do not know it or how to be recognized as one. This is a condition thatthe politicians could not allow to continue. At this point it would be

very easy for a citizen to wake up and just say that he is taking back his

sovereign citizenship. So a scheme had to be concocted to steal the

actual sovereign status from the individual once and for all. The fix was

in, but would take a few more years to work its way to fruition.

12


13/27

With the 16th amendment in place and the international bankers in

control of the monetary system, the international banking community

convinced the UNITED STATES to stop putting tariffs on incoming

goods as the constitution had provided to pay for US governmental

operation. The government forced the population to pay for all of the

government expenditures through the income tax that was passed in

1913. Of course it took many years before the tariffs were removed.

They (the international bankers) could not show there hand as to what

was going to happen in about 20 years. The income tax did not even

become relevant until the 1930s. It was a Trojan horse just sitting

there to be used at a later date.

The politicians still knew about state citizenship and were very careful

as to how they worded all the tax laws. They were very careful to keepall laws legal and according to the constitution and the Treaty of Paris.

They were very careful to enact tax laws that specifically mentioned

UNITED STATES Citizens and federal employees as tax payers. They

did not mention the State citizen for fear of the masses finding out what

was taken from them or that there was such a thing as sovereign

citizenship. But they kept it legal by using the voluntary statement on

the IRS 1040 form. This statement is strictly for state citizens that do

know their own status and want to contribute. Sovereign State Citizens

cannot be forced to pay income taxes. There is no way a UNITED

STATEs Citizen can get out of paying taxes. That is why you hear

about UNITED STATES citizens going to jail or loosing their property

for not paying their federal income taxes. You have never heard one

word about someone that has declared their state citizenship being

prosecuted for not paying taxes. That is because state citizens are not

included in the tax codes. They are considered Non resident aliens to

the Corporate UNITED STATES not the organic United States. State

citizens are the only citizens that actually get the benefits of the

constitution legally within our system. The UNITED STATES citizens

have no legal protection under the constitution. They can have only thebenefits that the Federal government will allow them to have.

This was the state of affairs in the country until the 1930s when the

United States went bankrupt. Again, politicians turned on the people

and went to the foreign bankers. Instead of turning to its citizens and

proposing a fix, they turned to the international bankers and changed

13


14/27

our free country into a corporate controlled state with its citizens truly

slaves to the state.

The problem is that natural people cannot be citizens with-in a

corporation. The UNITED STATES Corporation was established in

1871. They got around that one with the social security act. This is

where Franklin D. Roosevelt and the democratic party conspired to

permanently take away our natural born rights and instigate the

democratic party in power for ever. The government promoted the new

SS system to the people, by simply telling everyone that it was an

insurance policy for old age. But, under statute law not common law,

they had passed laws that went around common law. Buried within the

SS contract, the government also sets up a trust account in your name

that makes you a fictitious person with in the fictitious corporation of

the UNITED STATES. The piece that the citizen does not see is thetrust account in the persons name with in the corporation of the

UNITED STATES. That is why the state citizen once declared is not

responsible for the parts of any contract that are not spelled out on the

face of the Social Security contract. The trust account is basically

closed and the sovereign is no longer a corporate entity. They still

receive the Social Security benefits because that was the common law

part of the contract.

To recap history a little, in 1871 the politicians turned on the sovereign

citizen status and changed the federal government into the corporation

of the UNITED STATES. This pulled the federal government out from

under the constitution. To this day the corporate government does lip

service to the 1787 constitution, but continues to pass unconstitutional

laws. The UNITED STATES as a corporation is now a fictitious entity;

therefore it will only follow what it wants to, of the constitution to keep

the masses thinking that they have the protections of the constitution.

The constitution for the United States has no control in a corporation of

the UNITED STATES, because it has been codified and thereforesubject to change at will, not amendments. Of course the government

gives lip service to the constitution to keep the people believing that the

Federal corporation is following the constitution, but there are no legal

constitutional restrictions to the corporate federal government. Only

the ones that the federal government wants to adhere to will it follow.

14


15/27

To prove my point here is the definition of United States in US code:

Title 28, section 15.

15. UNITED STATES means

A. Federal Corporation

B. An agency, department, commission, board or other entity

of the UNITED STATES.

C. An instrumentality of the UNITED STATES.

Now, we will discuss the real reason for the social security contract.

What was not put in the body of the SS5 form (Social Security contract)

is that a trust account in the corporation of the UNITED STATES in the

name of UNITED STATES citizen that had applied is set up. The

significance of the Social Security Act is to provide an account in your

name and you are now a trustee in the UNITED STATES corporationand liable for all statutes and debts that are enacted or incurred within

the corporation rules. As a corporate citizen you do not have the

constitutional rights that the sovereign citizen has. You give up all that

for the protections and benefits that the corporation provides. As a

corporate citizen you have only the constitutional laws that the

corporation wants you to have. You can now see that the UNITED

STATES Corporation masks all of its corporate business in a phony act

of embracing the constitution, but all the while undermining it with

unconstitutional laws. The constitution does not apply to a corporate

individual because the corporate citizen is a fictitious person with your

name. You have been made to think that the fictitious person is you.

This was the final step to remove anything to do with sovereign

citizenship. Once signed with social security, it was believed that you

would never find out the truth because it was hidden so deep that it

would be impossible to find. In fact there are only a handful of people

in the country that understand the total story.

You can identify your corporate status in all paper work that you get

from any government entity. Your corporate name (Trust Account) isalways used. It is always spelled out in all capital letters. The

corporate UNITED STATES leaders pay lip service to the constitution

to keep up the illusion that we have all the rights that are enumerated in

the constitution. But under corporate law they can change anything

and do anything they wish to the laws governing fictitious citizens. That

is why so many unconstitutional laws have been passed and called legal.

15


16/27

They are legal under corporate rules. Now instead of constitutional

rights we have rights that the government wants us to have, they call

this civil law. Now they can control all aspects of your life without

repercussion. You can see that there are no more constitutional rights.

Only rights that the corporate UNITED STATES wants to give you.

Again, you must remember that you have unknowingly contracted with

the UNITED STATES government to unwillingly give away your

sovereign rights.

Why is this important? That is easy to answer. Let us say that the

country is now bankrupt. Where do we in the government turn to bail

our selves out from all the extravagant spending that the government

has and is continuing to do? You turn to the international bankers

again, just like we hear the third world countries are doing all the time.But, we cannot let the people know what we have done. So, first we

allow an international bank into this country called the Federal

Reserve.

[Federal Reserve ActDispersed throughout 12 USC; ch. 6, 38 Stat.251 (December 23, 1913)]. To provide for the establishment ofFederal reserve banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of

rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective

supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes.]The above is a definition given of the official explanation of the Federal

Reserve. It says nothing about being a branch of the United States

government or even as a locally owned bank in this country. Notice the

date of the legislation. It corresponds with the year of the Income Tax

16th amendment.

The Federal Reserve has never been audited by bank examiners. They

do not have to; they are above the jurisdiction of the UNITED STATES.

You see when the federal reserve convinced Roosevelt to get rid of the

gold standard, the federal reserve was able to print money with no

backing. When you pass a one dollar bill you are only passing a note

which is a promise to pay. You see, before the demise of the gold

standard, you could take that one dollar bill (gold certificate) and turn

it in for one dollar of gold. That was called real money. The problem is

that you could never print any more money than the government had in

16


17/27

gold reserves at Fort Knox. Now the federal reserve can print as much

money as the government wants to borrow. The federal reserve will

give the government all the money that they want. Why would they do

such a thing. They have collateral. All of the United States. I will go

into this further, but Roosevelt in 1933 in Senate document 43, he

passed into law that the government owns all of the land belonging to

UNITED STATES CITIZENS. Otherwise the Federal Reserve would

not loan the fictitious money to the government unless the government

guaranteed that they could put up the land of the UNITED STATES as

collateral.

You see the politicians knew that the country was going to go bankrupt

back at the turn of the 20th century. So, the Federal Reserve was set up

long before the country actually went bankrupt. Next we get a loan

from that bank. But, what can we use for collateral? They were veryingenious. Our trusted politicians decided to mortgage all of the efforts

of all the UNITED STATES citizens through the 16th amendment.

Notice I did not include state citizens. They are exempt. Unfortunately,

the truth has now been withheld for almost 100 years, so no one really

knows what the term state citizen really implies. So, by propaganda

and through the school systems, everyone is now a 14th amendment

UNITED STATES Citizen by definition. (Slave to the Federal

Corporate Government)

As you can see the UNITED STATES Corporation has now made slaves

of all of us and made us the payers of the national debt. Again, you

have to go back to the constitution to see that originally the United

States government was funded entirely by foreign tariffs. This was the

part that the international bankers would not tolerate, because it cost

more to get goods into this nation from Europe. By law the

government could only be funded by the incoming goods that were

assessed tariffs to pay for the United States government. The bankers

also did not like that fact that the American people were the only people

on the face of the earth that they could not control or tax because of theTreaty of Paris and the law of the 1787 Constitution.

Unfortunately, that was not enough for the foreign bankers. The

Europeans have never wanted the People of this country to be free. You

see only a free people can own their own land and be sovereign

individuals. So, they put one more stipulation into the loan to put the

17


18/27

UNITED STATES back in the money. The international bankers

wanted the UNITED STATES to mortgage all of the land within the

borders of the United States, which is exactly what the government

officials did.

In 1933 President Roosevelt turned on the people again. He signed the

following bill into law: "The ultimate ownership of all property is in

the state; individual so-called `ownership' is only by virtue of

government, i.e., law, amounting to a mere user; and use must be in

accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State."

Senate Document No. 43 (1933). The affect of this gave all property of

federal citizens to the state. Therefore, only sovereign citizens can now

have title to the land. Also in 1933 Roosevelt passed HJR 192 on June 5

that took the gold away from the people, even though they were notrequired to give it away. The affect this had on the country is that the

people were left without legal money for paying debts. In one fell

swoop of the pen Roosevelt transformed our society from a ownership

society to a credit society. You can see the effects today.

Again you ask how did this happen? The UNITED STATES

government does not own the land of the United States; the people own

the land. How can the government mortgage the land that they do not

own? That is the question that I asked and found the answer.

Around 1907 in preparation for the coming bankruptcy, the United

States government passed the Torrens act. I believe that this was

instigated by our governments ties with the international bankers at

this early stage in history. You see Torrens was a ruthless politician in

Australia and had passed the law down there to rob their citizens of

their land. It was actually a gimmick to take away true title to the land

from the people. The act essentially said that if a land owner would

bring in his actual title, which was a land patent, the government would

then give them the ability to break up their land and make it easier tosell and mortgage. The banks would in turn give them a deed to show

that they were entitled to the use of the land. The government would

record all transactions on the land.

18


19/27

I must give most of our ancestors in Clark county credit, they saw

through all of this fraud and very few actually went through with a

Torrens transaction, at least here in Clark County, Washington. What

the counties around the state did was start recording all land

transactions fraudulently. The county did not tell anyone that they

would have to bring the title forward on every transaction to keep the

title up to date. Without using Torrens or any actual law, they simply

stripped off the title and it would revert to the state, without the land

owner knowing what had happened. Now, all land owners had a deed

and all was as it should be with the state now claiming ownership to all

the land. We are now serfs to the feudal federal system.

The other document that the Washington State natural citizens should

be aware of is the 1878 Washington State Constitution which was

conceived in the town of Walla Walla, Washington. We in the State ofWashington have been swindled out of the original constitution long

enough. As it happens, the governor of the Washington territory Miles

Moore switched to a proposed 1889 constitution that was not approved

according to the conditions set down in 1878 constitution that was

already in place. The governor lied to the residents of Washington and

convinced everyone that we needed a different constitution. In fact

Washington was already a state before the politicians in Olympia

started to work on the 1889 constitution. The people did not get the

right to approve 1889 constitution until after we were already a state.

In fact all official documents in Washington DC still refer to the 1878

Walla Walla constitution. Any one that is interested should look up that

1878 constitution and read Article II sections 1, 2, and 3. Section 1

states the jurisdiction of the state, section 2 states that the land and

other property that is accrued to the territory of Washington shall vest

in the state, and section 3 the people of the state, in their right of

sovereignty, are declared to possess the ultimate property in and to all

lands within the jurisdiction of the state, and all lands, the title to which

shall fail from a defect of heirs, shall revert or escheat to the state.

Now you can see why the territorial governor wanted to loose the 1878

constitution. It confirmed to all residents of Washington that they were

sovereign in their status and that they would forever keep title to the

land. Think about those two statements. That is the meaning of being

free. Of course the 1889 constitution did not even cover these items.

Very few people in the state of Washington even know that we were all

19


20/27

swindled out of the original constitution. The other reason for getting

rid of the 1878 constitution, it was contrary to the 14th amendment and

the newly formed corporation of the UNITED STATES.

But, the state did not believe that someone would put it all together and

bring the title forward. But, if they should, the state passed laws so that

corporate citizens cannot hold title to the land. Only a state freeman or

sovereign can do this.

On the face that sounded really good. I was just as gullible as every one

else for most of my life. I assumed that a deed is the same thing as a

title. If you look in Blacks law you will find that what I say is true, they

are not the same. The problem is that now the owner does not have

true title to the land. The title was given over to the state under the

Torrens land registration act or fraudulent transactions by the countyregistrars. Under Torrens you could petition to get back the title to the

land; but if the county took the land by fraudulent means during the

registration of transaction process, it is really hard to get back the title

from the counties but not impossible.

The owner is now a tenant to the land, which the state controls title and

interest in the land, since they actually hold the title even though the

means was fraudulent. That is why we have to pay land taxes, fees and

get building permits to do anything with the land. THE PEOPLE DO

NOT HAVE TITLE TO THE LAND. That answers the question as to

why no one has the property rights that they believe. Also, the county

cannot tax the land unless the state actually has title. The owner does

not have the title, he has a deed. Again, they are not the same. The

state claims to hold the title, but they cannot prove it. The state can now

control anything that you do with the land because they claim to own

the land. The land owner is nothing but a tenant to the state. Again I

say, what is the difference in the European feudal system and the our

own corporate state owning all the land?

When the gigantic public trust was implemented in 1913 via the Federal

Reserve act, no immediate changes with regard to the master/serf

relationship that had developed between government and land holder

were necessary. Life went on as usual with no clues to the fact that all

property had been pledged to the Board of Governors of the Federal

Reserve; and as trustees, they held the MORTGAGE on all the land of

20


21/27

the UNITED STATES. This was accomplished by allowing the same

taxing agencies to act as administrating agents for this newly formed

trust.

In 1913, President Woodrow Wilson approved the Federal Reserve Act.

A few years later, he reflected:

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A

great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system

of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all

our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of

the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated

governments in the civilized world -- no longer a government by free

opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the

majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group

of dominant men."

A century before, Thomas Jefferson reflected much the same sentiment:

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of

their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks....will

deprive the people of all property until their children wakeup homeless

on the continent their fathers conquered....The issuing power should be

taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly

belongs."

On June 4, 1963, John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110 to

strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the

government at interest. On that day President John F. Kennedy signed

Executive Order No. 11110 that returned to the US government the

power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve.

Kennedys order gave the Treasury the power to issue silver

certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in

the Treasury. This meant that for every ounce of silver in the US

Treasurys vault, the government could introduce new money intocirculation. In all, Kennedy brought nearly $4.3 billion in US notes into

circulation. For a short period our money was backed by Silver. I

believe that this is the reason that President Kennedy was assassinated.

Five short months later, President Kennedy was assassinated, and upon

assuming office, newly sworn in President Lyndon Johnson recalled all

21


22/27

of the US Silver certificates that Kennedy had put into circulation.

Thus making President Ronald Reagan the next to challenge the power

of the Federal Reserve, but which abruptly ended with his near

assassination on March 30, 1981 by the hand of the crazed son of former

CIA Director, and then Vice President, George Bushs closest friends

and oil business backer John Hinckley Sr.

President Reagan had pitted himself against the Federal Reserve over

their refusal to lower the crushing interests rates they had imposed

upon the American people during the US recession of 1980-1982 which

was their greatest since the Great Depression, but after his near death

quietly signed into law on September 13, 1982, H.R.6128 which became

Public Law No: 97-258 that was written on the behalf of the Federal

Reserve by little known US Congressman Peter Wallace Rodino Jr.,

with no co-sponsors, and made it illegal for any future AmericanPresident to print money for the American people.

Now you are beginning to see that our land has been stolen along with

our sovereignty. We as citizens have been misled, and we are now true

slaves to the UNITED STATES Corporation and ultimately the Federal

Reserve and its owners. We are as much slaves to the corporate

UNITED STATES as the slaves were to the plantation owners of the

south, only we do not know it.

The UNITED STATES Corporation can now go back for the loan that

the international bankers would be willing to provide the UNITED

STATES Corporation. The United States mortgaged our efforts in the

form of income taxes (16th amendment) and the foreign bankers

(Federal Reserve legislation) wanted our land as part of the deal. Then

the federal government went to the states. Since all of the states are also

corporations, they were not going to get money from the corporate

UNITED STATES, unless they essentially mortgaged the land that they

had fraudulently taken from the land owners.

The states then mortgaged all of our land to the UNITED STATES

government corporation, which they in turn mortgaged the country to

through the Federal Reserve Bank, which is owned by the international

bankers. The Federal Reserve then made sure that the UNITED

STATES Citizens paid the national debt, so the Internal Revenue

Service was born as the collection arm of the Federal Reserve. It is a

22


23/27

branch of the Federal Reserve Bank, not a branch of the US

government.

As you can see, nothing is as what it seems. We have always been

taught to be good little corporate citizens (slaves).

The people of the UNITED STATES are slaves to the state, and the

most depressing part of the deal is that they do not even know it.

Definition of a slave: one that does not have freedom, one that is not

under common law and one that does not own land. Our land has been

lost by fraud and our sovereignty has been taken away through statute

law via illegal contracts, what else can we be called but SLAVES!

Now I will ask this question of you. Are you a state freeman or a

UNITED STATES Citizen? Are you content to continue to perpetuatethe lie, now that you know the truth. Only you can answer this

question. You have to analyze all of the ramifications to this

conundrum. If you are a state freeman, you pay no federal or state

income taxes or social security taxes; you are only subject to common

law and you can proceed to take back your land title and again pay no

taxes on your titled property. At this point you volunteer to sign a

contract for county services. With state citizenship comes responsibility

along with independence. The down side is that you cannot expect to

receive any of the benefits that the government provides by stealing the

money from one class of slave to give to another class of slave. One

other draw back is that a sovereign citizen has to be careful to never

sign any contract with the government. As a sovereign you have to get

rid of all licenses. Each license has a contract attached to it. The

government can suck you right back into the system if you sign some

document that gives the government authority over you.

With UNITED STATES Citizenship you will receive all the benefits that

they are using to buy you off and keep the slave population happy with

their lot in life. Such as college tuition, tax rebates, loss of freedom, andall the other rules that they are daily imposing upon its citizens. Soon

you will have national health care provided by the government that you

will be forced to take. They will continue to take more and more in tax

and give very little in return. You will see politicians getting rich off of

the tax money supplied by the slaves. You will be paying for all the

illegal aliens and every one else that does not want to work. We see how

23


24/27

the politicians of both parties go to Washington as regular people and

come back millionaires at our expense through graft and corruption.

For myself, I have declared my self a sovereign. I was worried at first

about all that money that I paid into the Social Security for all these

years. I waited a year then applied for my Social Security and started

receiving the payments in March 2009. Again, that was the common

law contract with the SS dept. They still have to pay, because that was

all part of the contract that was stated and signed by both parties. I am

also in the process of getting back pure title to my land. Only a

sovereign citizen can have title to the land. Laws have been passed at

the state level to prevent corporate citizens from ever getting clear title

to the land. As of Januay 25th 2010, I have filed a law suit in the 10th

Federal District Court against the County auditor to get my land patent

recognized. Utah Division court case 2:10cv00053 Description Darby v.Kimsey.

I am not trying to make this sound easy. It is going to be hard and scary

to accomplish all of the above items that make up a sovereign. In fact

there will be only a few that have the fortitude to join a group of like

minded individuals (Patriots for a lack of a better word) that are only

thinking of the future of our children. Most will take the easy way and

not make waves. I for one have never thought of myself as a slave. Now

that I know the truth, I am doing something about it. Wouldnt it be

great to leave our country to our children who are truly free sovereign

persons? I want to make everyone that has the fortitude a truly free

person. This is the information that you need to start your education.

In summary, if you continue this into the future and do some research

to make sure that I am not lying about what I have said, then it stands

to reason that someday in the future the international bankers are going

to want to foreclose on the massive debt. What do you think will

happen? I believe that at that time the facade will come off and theywill make themselves known to each and everyone of us. The

international bankers will take title to all the land. All that you have

paid into it will be for fit. Next, if you want to work you will be forced

to make what ever deals you can to keep your family alive. You will

give as much as they require to the banks to pay for the debt that our

politicians have run up. You can also see that there are two countries,

24


25/27

the United States of America of our forefathers and the country of the

corporate state brought into the existence by contracts, the UNITED

STATES OF AMERICA.

The student of our past history has to remember that all historical

documents such as the Constitution of the United States or Treaties are

contracts still in effect. That means that dishonest politicians had to

pass laws that would take your citizenship away from you by offering

you services or money from the federal government. If you accept

services or money from the county, state or federal; you become an

involuntary citizen of the District of Columbia a tax paying citizen. It

has finally come to pass that the federal government by giving money to

the counties after stealing from other citizens is now in the position to

make you a federal citizen by your acceptance of funds from the county

that the federal government supplied. As you can see, you have to bevery careful when accepting help from anyone. Your freedom is more

important than any help you receive from the government.

Are you a UNITED STATES Citizen or a state freeman? All I can do is

give you this information. What you do with it is entirely up to you.

Personally I can think of no better legacy to leave my children and

grand children than freedom from slavery. I have pledged my life,

liberty and my sacred HONOR as a sovereign citizen to this endeavor.

If you are of like mind, please contact me and I will put you in touch

with people that can help with the state citizenship paperwork and land

patents. [email protected]

The Patriot Post

Founders' Quote Daily

"No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can

any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is

preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant,and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own

weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders."

Samuel Adams (letter to James Warren, 4 November 1775)

25
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


26/27

Reference: Our Sacred Honor, Bennett (261)

The "Cartel for the Exchange of Prisoners of War between Great Britain and

the United States of America," dated May 12, 1813 mentions a flag called

the American Ensign. The exact origin and use of this flag is not known. A

picture of the American Ensign may be found in Illuminated History of

North America (1860). The American Ensign incorporates the blue stars

similar to those of the Revolutionary war era Guilford Flag and the vertical

stripes of the Civil Flag of the United States.

The Civilian Flag of the United States of America was flown, for over 100

years, by a select citizenry that could afford to buy them. Most used the

design of the Customs Bureau and its American Eagle, many used the design

of the American Ensign. These were not official flags like those created by

Congress for military use, but existed by custom.

Some historians believe that the Civil Flag was discontinued after the Civil

War when the federal government imposed military governments in the

States and disbanded civilian government. As a show of its power over the

States, Civil Flags were discontinued and Old Glory became the sole

emblem representing the People of the United States of America, united

under military (or admiralty) rule.

So, apparently there is more legitimacy to the Civil flag than I originally

thought and it is tied up with the concept of Sovereignty for WE THE

PEOPLE and the country as a whole.

When I use the term Freeman it encompasses both male and female. This is

for all free loving people of this country. It is a color blind idea and it is for

all that want freedom.

I must also acknowledge that I have used excerpts from many sources, most

of which were not signed. I owe all that I know from what I have read and

would identify these great writers if I could. No plagiarism is intended. Ihave used some of their words as they wrote them, because I could do no

better. All of these great people that have written on different subjects are

great patriots.

26


27/27

Brief History of Citizenship

Documents

Transcript of Brief History of Citizenship