Bozalek presentation

14
Connections between sociocultural learning theories and the political ethic of care Vivienne Bozalek University of the Western Cape [email protected]

description

This is my presentation at the Critical Care Conference at Brighton University 13-14 September 2012. It deals with sociocultural learning theories and their intersections with the political ethics of care

Transcript of Bozalek presentation

Page 1: Bozalek presentation

Connections between sociocultural learning theories and the political ethic of care

Vivienne BozalekUniversity of the Western Cape

[email protected]

Page 2: Bozalek presentation

Philosophical roots Background to paper Vygotsky Leont’ev and Engestrom Connectivism

Overview of presentation

Page 3: Bozalek presentation

The Political Ethics of CareTronto and Sevenhuijsen

Page 5: Bozalek presentation

Every function in the child's cultural development appears twice: first, on the social level, and later on the individual level; first, between people (interpsychological), and then inside the child (intrapsychological). This applies equally to voluntary attention, to logical memory, and to the formulation of concepts. All the higher functions originate as actual relations between human individuals (Vygotsky, 1978:57)

Relationality - Lev Vygotsky

Page 6: Bozalek presentation

“… the distance between the actual developmental level as determined by independent problem solving and the level of potential development as determined through problem solving under adult guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers… the actual developmental level characterises mental development retrospectively, while the zone of proximal development characterises mental development prospectively.” (Vygotsky, 1978:86-87)

Zone of Proximal DevelopmentVygotsky

http://www.flickr.com/photos/josemota/

Page 7: Bozalek presentation

First generation Activity TheoryLev Vygotsky (1978)

Page 8: Bozalek presentation

Leont’ev and Engestrom

marxists.org

edu.helsinki.fi

Page 9: Bozalek presentation

Second generation activity theory – Leontiev (1978) & Engeström (1987)

SubjectObject

Outcome

Rules Community Division of labor

Mediating artefacts

Page 10: Bozalek presentation

Explanation of concepts Subject – individual or group who are involved in the

activity or who you choose to analyse Object – focus/purpose/problem space at which the

activity is directed (acted on and transformed by subject) and which is moulded into outcomes with the help of

Instruments – the mediational means (culture-specific or technological tools, models etc)

Community – group of individuals who participate on acting on the shared object

Division of labour – tasks, responsibilities and power relations

Rules - norms, conventions which drive activity

Page 11: Bozalek presentation

The connected service user

Human flourishing

Service user

Tools for caregiving – conversations, practices, Websites, blogs, wikis, support groups etc

Norms affecting

the caring process

Division of labour – who is

doing what n the care process

Community – who is contributing to human flourishing?

Relationships & connections

http://www.flickr.com/photos/hikingartist/5726834773/sizes/s/in/photostream

Thanks to Veronica Mitchell for this slide

Page 12: Bozalek presentation

Connectivism

George Siemens Distributed knowledge Networks of people Nurturing and

maintaining connections to facilitate learning

http://www.flickr.com/photos/stephen_downes

Page 13: Bozalek presentation

Second Life – 3D immersive environment

Page 14: Bozalek presentation

Engeström, Y. (1987).Learning by Expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research.Helsinki:Orienta-Konsultit.

Hardman, J. (2008). Researching pedagogy: Activity Theory Approach. Journal of Education, 45:1-30.

Siemens, G. (2005) ‘Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. www.connectivism.ca (accessed 21 August 2012)

Siemens, G., &Tittenberger, P. (2009). Handbook of Emerging Technology for Learning. University of Manitoba. Available at http://elearnspace.org/Articles/HETL.pdf (accessed 21 August 2012)

Tronto J. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care.. New York & London: Routledge.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. 2Souberman (Eds.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

References