Bose einstein condensation-in_dilute_gases_-_pethick_c.j.__smith_h.
Bose-Einstein condensation of metastable He
description
Transcript of Bose-Einstein condensation of metastable He
Bose-Einstein condensation of metastable He
Chris Westbrookl’Institut d’Optique, Orsay, FranceEPS-12 August 2002
the helium atom
lifetimes:
23S111S0 : ~ 9000 s
23P223S1 : ~ 100 ns
23P211S0 : ~ 2 s11S0
23S1
23PJ
…
…
J =
1083 nm
20 eV58 nm
singlets triplets
0
12
Why He*? If laser cooling of He* is a good idea, so
is evaporative cooling. metastability: detection… Penning ionization
He* + He* He + He + e
s 1 1 0 1/2 1/2
stot 0,1,2 0,1
Strong suppression of ionization (Amsterdam)Expts: Amsterdam, Utrecht, Canberra, Paris, Orsay
Apparatus
At the BEC transition
0.08 0.10 0.120.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
arrival time (s)
MC
P c
urre
nt
MCP
v
we measure N, T,
Summary
N0 ~ , n0 ~ cm
scattering length a = 18 ± 8 nm
Thomas-Fermi parameter: = N0 a/
collision rate at TC: = nv ~ s
hydrodynamic regime quantum depletion (na3) ~ 0.01
Science, 292, 461 (2001), PRL 68, 3459 (2001)
Observation of ions
MCP
-30 V
trapped atoms
He+
loss and ionization rate
€
dNdt
=−β n2dV∫ −L n3dV∫
€
Γ =1N
dIdt
= ˜ β n + ˜ L n2
€
dIdt
=β2
n2dV∫ +L3
n3dV∫
€
N = f (t;β,L)
Analysis of ion signal
lifetime: difficult to analyse
we can measure dI/dt
and measure N, T, nbest for a "pure" BEC
Trap off
€
Γ =1N
dIdt
=β n +L n2
ion rate vs density (quasi-pure BEC)
decay of the number of atoms
Independent of the ion detection
Ionization accounts for most of the loss
O. Sirjean et al. cond-mat/0208108
N = f(t,,L)
€
Γ3−bodyBEC =
13!
1+ 64π n0a
3[ ]Ln0
2
conclusions Calibration of N and I is difficult. We use a to get N0. 2 body ionization rate coeff: -14 cm3s-1
3 body ionization is important cm6s-1
Statistical factors (2! or 3!) are important, but:
50% correctionKagan, Svistunov, Shlyapnikov, JETP Lett. 42, 209 (1985)
We need the same for a thermal cloud and a better measurement of a.
making correlated atom pairs
Four wave mixing NIST: Science 398, 218 (1999)
MIT: cond-mat/0203286 (2002)
Atoms (photons) created in entangled pairs
PRL 85, 3987 (2000)PRL 85, 3991 (2000)
Data from NIST 1999
detecting the pairs Spontaneous 4 wave mixing ("perfect
correlations")
Raman pulses create colliding, untrapped condensates (other ways?)
Spatial correlations become temporal correlations
|0> + |0> collisions: Inelastic rate !
MCP detector
Thank you
groupe ‘hélium’: O. Sirjean, S. Seidelin, J.Gomes, R. HoppelerD. Boiron, A.Aspect, C.W.G. Shlyapnikov
groupe d’optique atomiqueG. Delannoy, Y. Lecoq, F. Gerbier, R. Simon, J. Estève, C. Aussibal, M. Fauquembergue, S. Rangwala, J. Thywissen, D. Stevens, V. Savalli, P. Bouyer, N. Westbrook, I. Bouchoule