Bomb Maneuvering Prediction for Mine...

42
UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Bomb Maneuvering Prediction for Mine Breaching Dr. Peter C. Chu and LT Greg Ray Naval Postgraduate School Peter Fleischer Naval Oceanographic Office Paul Gefken, SRI Sponsored by CNMOC MIW Directory ONR Coastal Engineering Seventh International Symposium on Technology and the Mine Problem, NPS, Monterey, CA 93943, May 2-4, 2006

Transcript of Bomb Maneuvering Prediction for Mine...

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Bomb Maneuvering Prediction for Mine Breaching

Dr. Peter C. Chu and LT Greg RayNaval Postgraduate School

Peter FleischerNaval Oceanographic Office

Paul Gefken, SRI

Sponsored by CNMOC MIW Directory ONR Coastal Engineering

Seventh International Symposium on Technology and the Mine Problem, NPS, Monterey, CA 93943, May 2-4, 2006

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Bomb Strike for Mine Clearance

ONR JDAM Assault Breaching System (JABS)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

References

• Chu, P.C. and C. Fan, 2004: Three dimensional rigid body impact burial prediction model. Advances in Fluid Mechanics, 6, 43-52.

• Chu, P.C., and C.W. Fan, 3D rigid body impact burial prediction model. Advances in Mechanics, 5, 43-52, 2004.

• Chu, P.C., C.W. Fan, A. D. Evans, and A. Gilles, 2004: Triple coordinate transforms for prediction of falling cylinder through the water column. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 71, 292-298.

• Chu, P.C., A. Gilles, and C.W. Fan, 2005: Experiment of falling cylinder through the water column. Experimental and Thermal Fluid Sciences, 29, 555-568.

• Chu, P.C., and C.W. Fan, 2005: Pseudo-cylinder parameterization for mine impact burial prediction. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 127, 1515-1520.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

References• Chu, P.C., and C.W. Fan, 2006: Prediction of falling cylinder through

air-water-sediment columns. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 73, 300-314.

• Chu, P.C., G. Ray, and C.W. Fan, 2006: Prediction of High Speed Rigid Body Maneuvering in Air-Water-Sediment Columns, Advances in Fluid Mechanics, 7, 123-132.

• Chu, P.C., and C.W. Fan, 2007: Mine impact burial model (IMPACT35) verification and improvement using sediment bearing factor method. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, in press.

• Chu, P.C., 2007: Mine impact burial prediction from one to threedimensions. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, in press.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

References

• Chu, P.C., A. Evans, T. Gilles, T. Smith, V. Taber, Development of Navy’s 3D mine impact burial prediction model (IMPACT35), Sixth Monterey International Symposium on Technology and Mine Problems, NPS, Monterey, California, May 10-14, 2004.

• Chu, P.C., G. Ray, P. Fleischer, and P. Gefken, Development of three dimensional bomb maneuvering model, DVD-ROM (10 pages). Seventh Monterey International Symposium on Technology and Mine Problems, NPS, Monterey, California, May 1-4, 2006.

• Chu, P.C., C. Allen, and P. Fleischer, Non-cylindrical mine impact experiment, DVD-ROM (10 pages). Seventh Monterey International Symposium on Technology and Mine Problems, NPS, Monterey, California, May 1-4, 2006.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

SRI Bomb Trajectory Experiment

• SRI International performed an experimental research program in which 1/12-scale high fidelity Mk84 bombs were launched into a deep-water pool at velocities of up to about 1000 ft/s.

• Using two underwater high-speed video cameras, they determined the underwater trajectory of the Mk84 bombs for a nominal vertical entry and for different possible tail configurations included a complete warhead section with (1) a tail section and four fins, (2) a tail section and two fins, (3) a tail section and no fins, and (4) no tail section.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

SRI Experimental Data (Two-Dimensional, 12 Sets)

• With a Tail Section: COM location only, no orientation data• No Fin: Test-16, -17, -18 • 2 Fins: Test-10, -11, -19• 4 Fins: Test-2, -3, -4.

• With a Tail Section COM location and Orientation• Test-13, -14, -15 • Only the three sets of data are used for STRIKE35

development and Verification

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Model-Data Inter-Comparison STRIKE35 vs SRI Experiment (Test 13)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Model-Data Inter-Comparison STRIKE35 vs SRI Experiment (Test 14)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Model-Data Inter-Comparison STRIKE35 vs SRI Experiment (Test 15)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Prediction of Bomb Maneuvering Trajectory

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

3D Bomb Maneuvering Model (STRIKE35)

• Triple Coordinate Systems• Momentum Equations• Moment of Momentum Equations• Parameterization of Hydrodynamic Forces and

Torques on Bomb• Supercavitaion• Bubble Dynamics

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Triple Coordinate Transform

• Earth-fixed coordinate (E-coordinate)

• Bomb’s main-axis following coordinate (M-coordinate)

• Hydrodynamic force following coordinate (F-coordinate).

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

E and M Coordinate Systems

, M M M M M= × = ×j k i k i j

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

E-Coordinate, FE(O, i, j, k)

• COM Position: X = xi +yj + zk,

• Translation velocity:

dX/dt = V, V = (u,v, w)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Transform Between E- and M-Coordinate Systems

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

F-Coordinate System

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

E- and F-Coordinate Transform

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Momentum Equation in E-Coordinate System

Fh is hydrodynamic force (drag, lift)

Fv is the bubble force (drag, lift)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Moment of Momentum Equation in M-Coordinate System

Inertial terms are small

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

M-Coordinate

The moment of gyration tensor for the axiallySymmetric cylinder is a diagonal matrix

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Bomb Trajectory Modeling

Core PhysicsBomb Trajectory Model (STRIKE 35)

Drag & LiftForces/TorquesDynamic

FluidModel

DynamicBubbleModel

Cd, Cl

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

There is no existing formulae for calculating Cd and Cl for MK-84 Bomb.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Two-Step Modeling

• (1) Determine drag and lift coefficients for a particular bomb (usually from experiments)

• (2) Predict bomb trajectory using stand-alone bomb strike model (STRIKE-35) with the known drag and lift coefficients.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

STRIKE 35 Modeling

Core PhysicsBomb Trajectory Model (STRIKE 35)

Drag & LiftForces/TorquesDynamic

FluidModel

DynamicBubbleModel

Cd, Cl

Experiment

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Dynamical Determination of Drag/Lift Coefficients

vc

fb

mc

fg

V

fc

fdrag

flift

α

β

γσ v σ f

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

β bomb elevation angle γ : bomb velocity angle

α β γ= − : attack angle

V : water velocity relative to Bomb

cm : center of mass cv : center of volume

cf : center of drag and lift forces

dragf : drag force liftf : lift force bf : buoyancy force

gf : Gravity

fσ : the distance between cm cfand

: the distance between cm and cv

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Theoretical Base

Here, v is the translation velocity of COM,

( ) drag d lift ldm m g f fdt

ρ= Π − + +v k e e

( )v b f drag lift rddt

= × + × + +ΩI r f r f f Mi

Ω is the angular velocity.

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Determination of Cd and CLfrom Experimental Data

( )

( )

2

2

/12

/12

d dd

l ll

m g md dtC

DLV

m g md dtC

DLV

ρ

ρ

ρ

ρ

Π − −=

Π − − ⋅=

k e v e

k e v e

i i

i

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Analytical Formulae for (Cd, Cl) Using Three Sets of SRI MK-84 Data without Tail

( ) ( )

( )

2Re8sin 2 0.02 if sin 2 0 and Re Re

Re

Re0.34 sin 2 0.02

Re

refref

dref

C

otherwise

α α

α

⎧ ⎛ ⎞+ ≥ ≥⎪ ⎜ ⎟

⎪ ⎝ ⎠= ⎨⎛ ⎞⎪ +⎜ ⎟⎪⎝ ⎠⎩

( )

( )

1.2 1.2ReRe2.5sin 2 min , if sin(2 ) 0Re Re

0.16sin 2 if sin(2 ) 0

ref

reflCα α

α α

⎧ ⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ≥⎜ ⎟⎪ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟= ⎢ ⎥⎨ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦⎪<⎪⎩

7Re 1.51 10ref = ×

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Determination of Center of Hydrodynamic Force from Experimental Data

* f vf L

σ σσ

−=

( )322

2

*

2 2

1 22 6 8 2

1 12 2

vvr rr r v b b r f r v

rf v

b d d l l r

Ld L Vd C DL Vdt dt

LC DLV C DLV

σσσ ρ σ

σ σρ ρ

⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞ΩΩΩ⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟+Ω − × + + + + Ω⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦= −⎛ ⎞× +⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠

eI e e e f e

e e e e

i i i

i

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Analytical Formulae for Using Three Sets of SRI MK-84 Data without Tail

*fσ

** 1 3 1 1sinh and

8 2 2 2 2f v f

f L Lσ σ σπσ α

− ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= = − − ≤ ≤⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

0

0.5

1

Re

Dra

g F

orce

Coe

ffici

ent (

Cd)

test13

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

0

45

90

135

180

Atta

ck A

ngle

α (

o )

ExpProf

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

−1

0

1

Re

Lift

For

ce C

oeffi

cien

t (C

l)

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

0

45

90

135

180

Atta

ck A

ngle

α (

o )

ExpProf

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

−0.5

0

0.5

Re

RH

F C

ente

r σ f*

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

0

45

90

135

180

Atta

ck A

ngle

α (

o )

ExpProf

• Test-13

• Cd, Cl, *fσ

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Test-14

• Cd, Cl, *fσ

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

0

1

Re

Dra

g F

orce

Coe

ffici

ent (

Cd)

test14

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

0

45

90

135

180

Atta

ck A

ngle

α (

o )

ExpProf

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

−1.5

−1

−0.5

0

0.5

1

Re

Lift

For

ce C

oeffi

cien

t (C

l)

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

0

45

90

135

180

Atta

ck A

ngle

α (

o )

ExpProf

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

−0.5

0

0.5

Re

RH

F C

ente

r σ f*

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

0

45

90

135

180

Atta

ck A

ngle

α (

o )

ExpProf

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

• Test-15

• Cd, Cl, *fσ

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

0

0.5

1

1.5

Re

Dra

g F

orce

Coe

ffici

ent (

Cd)

test15

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

0

45

90

135

180

Atta

ck A

ngle

α (

o )

ExpProf

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

−2

−1

0

1

Re

Lift

For

ce C

oeffi

cien

t (C

l)

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

0

45

90

135

180

Atta

ck A

ngle

α (

o )

ExpProf

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

−0.5

0

0.5

Re

RH

F C

ente

r σ f*

2 4 6 8 10

x 107

0

45

90

135

180

Atta

ck A

ngle

α (

o )

ExpProf

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

STRIKE35 and SRI Data Inter-ComparisonTest-13

−5 0 5 10

−20

−15

−10

−5

0

Y(m

)

X(m)

Experiment test 13 time:0.485s

−5 0 5 10X(m)

Model time:0.485s

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

STRIKE35 and SRI Data Inter-ComparisonTest-13

−2

0

2

4

6

8

Xc

(m)

ExpModel

−25

−20

−15

−10

−5

0

5

Yc

(m)

ExpModel

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45−100

−50

0

50

100

Time (s)

Ele

vatio

n (o )

ExpModel

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

STRIKE35 and SRI Data Inter-ComparisonTest-14

−5 0 5 10

−20

−15

−10

−5

0

Y(m

)

X(m)

Experiment test 14 time:0.406s

−5 0 5 10X(m)

Model time:0.406s

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

STRIKE35 and SRI Data Inter-ComparisonTest-14

−2

0

2

4

6

8

10

Xc

(m)

ExpModel

−25

−20

−15

−10

−5

0

5

Yc

(m)

ExpModel

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4−100

−50

0

50

100

150

Time (s)

Ele

vatio

n (o )

ExpModel

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

STRIKE35 and SRI Data Inter-ComparisonTest-15

−5 0 5 10−20

−15

−10

−5

0

Y(m

)

X(m)

Experiment test 15 time:0.233s

−5 0 5 10X(m)

Model time:0.233s

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

STRIKE35 and SRI Data Inter-ComparisonTest-15

−2

0

2

4

6

8

Xc

(m)

ExpModel

−20

−15

−10

−5

0

5

Yc

(m)

ExpModel

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2−100

−50

0

50

100

Time (s)

Ele

vatio

n (o )

ExpModel

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Conclusions

• (1) STIRKE-35 has capability to predict bomb trajectory.

• (2) A key issue for the prediction is the determination of drag and lift coefficients (Cd, Cl) for a particular bomb.

• (3) Bomb trajectory experiment is needed for determining (Cd, Cl).