Bomb Maneuvering Prediction for Mine...
Transcript of Bomb Maneuvering Prediction for Mine...
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Bomb Maneuvering Prediction for Mine Breaching
Dr. Peter C. Chu and LT Greg RayNaval Postgraduate School
Peter FleischerNaval Oceanographic Office
Paul Gefken, SRI
Sponsored by CNMOC MIW Directory ONR Coastal Engineering
Seventh International Symposium on Technology and the Mine Problem, NPS, Monterey, CA 93943, May 2-4, 2006
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
References
• Chu, P.C. and C. Fan, 2004: Three dimensional rigid body impact burial prediction model. Advances in Fluid Mechanics, 6, 43-52.
• Chu, P.C., and C.W. Fan, 3D rigid body impact burial prediction model. Advances in Mechanics, 5, 43-52, 2004.
• Chu, P.C., C.W. Fan, A. D. Evans, and A. Gilles, 2004: Triple coordinate transforms for prediction of falling cylinder through the water column. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 71, 292-298.
• Chu, P.C., A. Gilles, and C.W. Fan, 2005: Experiment of falling cylinder through the water column. Experimental and Thermal Fluid Sciences, 29, 555-568.
• Chu, P.C., and C.W. Fan, 2005: Pseudo-cylinder parameterization for mine impact burial prediction. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 127, 1515-1520.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
References• Chu, P.C., and C.W. Fan, 2006: Prediction of falling cylinder through
air-water-sediment columns. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 73, 300-314.
• Chu, P.C., G. Ray, and C.W. Fan, 2006: Prediction of High Speed Rigid Body Maneuvering in Air-Water-Sediment Columns, Advances in Fluid Mechanics, 7, 123-132.
• Chu, P.C., and C.W. Fan, 2007: Mine impact burial model (IMPACT35) verification and improvement using sediment bearing factor method. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, in press.
• Chu, P.C., 2007: Mine impact burial prediction from one to threedimensions. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, in press.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
References
• Chu, P.C., A. Evans, T. Gilles, T. Smith, V. Taber, Development of Navy’s 3D mine impact burial prediction model (IMPACT35), Sixth Monterey International Symposium on Technology and Mine Problems, NPS, Monterey, California, May 10-14, 2004.
• Chu, P.C., G. Ray, P. Fleischer, and P. Gefken, Development of three dimensional bomb maneuvering model, DVD-ROM (10 pages). Seventh Monterey International Symposium on Technology and Mine Problems, NPS, Monterey, California, May 1-4, 2006.
• Chu, P.C., C. Allen, and P. Fleischer, Non-cylindrical mine impact experiment, DVD-ROM (10 pages). Seventh Monterey International Symposium on Technology and Mine Problems, NPS, Monterey, California, May 1-4, 2006.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
SRI Bomb Trajectory Experiment
• SRI International performed an experimental research program in which 1/12-scale high fidelity Mk84 bombs were launched into a deep-water pool at velocities of up to about 1000 ft/s.
• Using two underwater high-speed video cameras, they determined the underwater trajectory of the Mk84 bombs for a nominal vertical entry and for different possible tail configurations included a complete warhead section with (1) a tail section and four fins, (2) a tail section and two fins, (3) a tail section and no fins, and (4) no tail section.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
SRI Experimental Data (Two-Dimensional, 12 Sets)
• With a Tail Section: COM location only, no orientation data• No Fin: Test-16, -17, -18 • 2 Fins: Test-10, -11, -19• 4 Fins: Test-2, -3, -4.
• With a Tail Section COM location and Orientation• Test-13, -14, -15 • Only the three sets of data are used for STRIKE35
development and Verification
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
3D Bomb Maneuvering Model (STRIKE35)
• Triple Coordinate Systems• Momentum Equations• Moment of Momentum Equations• Parameterization of Hydrodynamic Forces and
Torques on Bomb• Supercavitaion• Bubble Dynamics
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Triple Coordinate Transform
• Earth-fixed coordinate (E-coordinate)
• Bomb’s main-axis following coordinate (M-coordinate)
• Hydrodynamic force following coordinate (F-coordinate).
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
E-Coordinate, FE(O, i, j, k)
• COM Position: X = xi +yj + zk,
• Translation velocity:
dX/dt = V, V = (u,v, w)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Momentum Equation in E-Coordinate System
Fh is hydrodynamic force (drag, lift)
Fv is the bubble force (drag, lift)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Moment of Momentum Equation in M-Coordinate System
Inertial terms are small
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
M-Coordinate
The moment of gyration tensor for the axiallySymmetric cylinder is a diagonal matrix
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Bomb Trajectory Modeling
Core PhysicsBomb Trajectory Model (STRIKE 35)
Drag & LiftForces/TorquesDynamic
FluidModel
DynamicBubbleModel
Cd, Cl
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Two-Step Modeling
• (1) Determine drag and lift coefficients for a particular bomb (usually from experiments)
• (2) Predict bomb trajectory using stand-alone bomb strike model (STRIKE-35) with the known drag and lift coefficients.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
STRIKE 35 Modeling
Core PhysicsBomb Trajectory Model (STRIKE 35)
Drag & LiftForces/TorquesDynamic
FluidModel
DynamicBubbleModel
Cd, Cl
Experiment
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Dynamical Determination of Drag/Lift Coefficients
vc
fb
mc
fg
V
fc
fdrag
flift
α
β
γσ v σ f
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
β bomb elevation angle γ : bomb velocity angle
α β γ= − : attack angle
V : water velocity relative to Bomb
cm : center of mass cv : center of volume
cf : center of drag and lift forces
dragf : drag force liftf : lift force bf : buoyancy force
gf : Gravity
fσ : the distance between cm cfand
vσ
vσ
: the distance between cm and cv
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Theoretical Base
Here, v is the translation velocity of COM,
( ) drag d lift ldm m g f fdt
ρ= Π − + +v k e e
( )v b f drag lift rddt
= × + × + +ΩI r f r f f Mi
Ω is the angular velocity.
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Determination of Cd and CLfrom Experimental Data
( )
( )
2
2
/12
/12
d dd
l ll
m g md dtC
DLV
m g md dtC
DLV
ρ
ρ
ρ
ρ
Π − −=
Π − − ⋅=
k e v e
k e v e
i i
i
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Analytical Formulae for (Cd, Cl) Using Three Sets of SRI MK-84 Data without Tail
( ) ( )
( )
2Re8sin 2 0.02 if sin 2 0 and Re Re
Re
Re0.34 sin 2 0.02
Re
refref
dref
C
otherwise
α α
α
⎧ ⎛ ⎞+ ≥ ≥⎪ ⎜ ⎟
⎪ ⎝ ⎠= ⎨⎛ ⎞⎪ +⎜ ⎟⎪⎝ ⎠⎩
( )
( )
1.2 1.2ReRe2.5sin 2 min , if sin(2 ) 0Re Re
0.16sin 2 if sin(2 ) 0
ref
reflCα α
α α
⎧ ⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎪ ⎢ ⎥ ≥⎜ ⎟⎪ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟= ⎢ ⎥⎨ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦⎪<⎪⎩
7Re 1.51 10ref = ×
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Determination of Center of Hydrodynamic Force from Experimental Data
* f vf L
σ σσ
−=
( )322
2
*
2 2
1 22 6 8 2
1 12 2
vvr rr r v b b r f r v
rf v
b d d l l r
Ld L Vd C DL Vdt dt
LC DLV C DLV
σσσ ρ σ
σ σρ ρ
⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞ΩΩΩ⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟+Ω − × + + + + Ω⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦= −⎛ ⎞× +⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
eI e e e f e
e e e e
i i i
i
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Analytical Formulae for Using Three Sets of SRI MK-84 Data without Tail
*fσ
** 1 3 1 1sinh and
8 2 2 2 2f v f
f L Lσ σ σπσ α
− ⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= = − − ≤ ≤⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
0
0.5
1
Re
Dra
g F
orce
Coe
ffici
ent (
Cd)
test13
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
0
45
90
135
180
Atta
ck A
ngle
α (
o )
ExpProf
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
−1
0
1
Re
Lift
For
ce C
oeffi
cien
t (C
l)
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
0
45
90
135
180
Atta
ck A
ngle
α (
o )
ExpProf
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
−0.5
0
0.5
Re
RH
F C
ente
r σ f*
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
0
45
90
135
180
Atta
ck A
ngle
α (
o )
ExpProf
• Test-13
• Cd, Cl, *fσ
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
• Test-14
• Cd, Cl, *fσ
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
0
1
Re
Dra
g F
orce
Coe
ffici
ent (
Cd)
test14
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
0
45
90
135
180
Atta
ck A
ngle
α (
o )
ExpProf
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
−1.5
−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1
Re
Lift
For
ce C
oeffi
cien
t (C
l)
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
0
45
90
135
180
Atta
ck A
ngle
α (
o )
ExpProf
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
−0.5
0
0.5
Re
RH
F C
ente
r σ f*
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
0
45
90
135
180
Atta
ck A
ngle
α (
o )
ExpProf
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
• Test-15
• Cd, Cl, *fσ
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
0
0.5
1
1.5
Re
Dra
g F
orce
Coe
ffici
ent (
Cd)
test15
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
0
45
90
135
180
Atta
ck A
ngle
α (
o )
ExpProf
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
−2
−1
0
1
Re
Lift
For
ce C
oeffi
cien
t (C
l)
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
0
45
90
135
180
Atta
ck A
ngle
α (
o )
ExpProf
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
−0.5
0
0.5
Re
RH
F C
ente
r σ f*
2 4 6 8 10
x 107
0
45
90
135
180
Atta
ck A
ngle
α (
o )
ExpProf
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
STRIKE35 and SRI Data Inter-ComparisonTest-13
−5 0 5 10
−20
−15
−10
−5
0
Y(m
)
X(m)
Experiment test 13 time:0.485s
−5 0 5 10X(m)
Model time:0.485s
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
STRIKE35 and SRI Data Inter-ComparisonTest-13
−2
0
2
4
6
8
Xc
(m)
ExpModel
−25
−20
−15
−10
−5
0
5
Yc
(m)
ExpModel
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45−100
−50
0
50
100
Time (s)
Ele
vatio
n (o )
ExpModel
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
STRIKE35 and SRI Data Inter-ComparisonTest-14
−5 0 5 10
−20
−15
−10
−5
0
Y(m
)
X(m)
Experiment test 14 time:0.406s
−5 0 5 10X(m)
Model time:0.406s
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
STRIKE35 and SRI Data Inter-ComparisonTest-14
−2
0
2
4
6
8
10
Xc
(m)
ExpModel
−25
−20
−15
−10
−5
0
5
Yc
(m)
ExpModel
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4−100
−50
0
50
100
150
Time (s)
Ele
vatio
n (o )
ExpModel
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
STRIKE35 and SRI Data Inter-ComparisonTest-15
−5 0 5 10−20
−15
−10
−5
0
Y(m
)
X(m)
Experiment test 15 time:0.233s
−5 0 5 10X(m)
Model time:0.233s
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
STRIKE35 and SRI Data Inter-ComparisonTest-15
−2
0
2
4
6
8
Xc
(m)
ExpModel
−20
−15
−10
−5
0
5
Yc
(m)
ExpModel
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2−100
−50
0
50
100
Time (s)
Ele
vatio
n (o )
ExpModel