Blast Furnace Ironmaking Introduction MATERIALS 3F03 MARCH 23, 2015.
-
Upload
blaze-evans -
Category
Documents
-
view
261 -
download
3
Transcript of Blast Furnace Ironmaking Introduction MATERIALS 3F03 MARCH 23, 2015.
Blast Furnace IronmakingIntroduction
MATERIALS 3F03MARCH 23, 2015
IntroductionOn the highest level, the blast furnace exists to smelt iron ore
Major considerations for this introductory lecture: 1) Iron oxide reduction 2) Satisfying energy requirements
Overall materials balance illustrates the process as a starting point for discussion
2
Figure Source: 1
Layout of a Modern BF
3
Figure Source: 2
Typical Blast Furnace Profile
4
Figure Source: 2
Iron Ores
5
Figure Source: 2
Almost all industrial Ironmaking worldwide is based around iron oxide ores
Iron is the fourth most abundant element on the Earth’s crust
Generally require Fe content of >58 wt % for economical BF process Increased slag volume at higher gangue contents Leads to gas permeability, productivity reduction
Most iron ore requires processing to increase Fe content Crushing and screening (usually minimum step) Possible upgrading (ex, magnetic separation) Pelletization
Iron Oxide Reduction
6
Figure Source: 2
Three thermodynamically stable species of Iron oxides: Hematite: Fe2O3
Magnetite: Fe3O4
Wustite: Fe0.947O (usually just FeO for analysis)
Name Ch. Formula Wt. % Fe O / Fe
Hematite Fe2O3 70.0 1.5
Magnetite Fe3O4 72.4 1.33
Wustite Fe0.947O 76.6 1.05
Iron Fe 100 0
FeO0.5 is a chemical representation used by Ironmakers to represent average oxidation state, but not a stable FeOx species in its own right.
Purpose of Blast Furnace
Reductant
7
Figure Source: 3
The Ellingham diagram can be used to analyze metal oxide reduction thermodynamic capabilities
The BF process is mainly the carbothermic reduction of iron oxide C enters BF primarily as Coke
CO can theoretically be used as a reductant for all oxides above the line Why is the slope negative?
Reduction of FeO to Fe requires the most chemical work Final reduction step in BF Lowest on diagram relative to Fe2O3,
Fe3O4
Iron Oxide Reduction
8
Figure Source: 2
Sequential Reduction of Iron Oxides:
3Fe2O3 + CO -> 2Fe3O4 + CO2
1.2Fe3O4 + CO -> 3.8Fe0.947O + CO2
Fe0.947O + CO = 0.947Fe + CO2FeO0.5 is a chemical representation used by Ironmakers to represent average oxidation state, but not a stable FeOx species in its own right.
The Solution Loss Reaction
9
Figure Source: 1
The solution loss reaction: CO2 (g) + C(s) -> 2CO (g)
Key characteristics of metallurgical relevance: Very endothermic High activation energy (360 kJ/mol)
Essentially stops below 1200 K / 900⁰C
However, the reaction regenerates reducing gas by consuming coke
Other names for reaction used in Industry: Boudouard reaction Coke gasification Gas regeneration (more ambiguous naming, but used)
Oxygen Removal
10
Figure Source: 4
430 kg O /tonne Fe to remove from pure Fe2O3 48 kg O /tonne Fe from Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 80 kg O / tonne Fe from Fe3O4 to Fe2O3 302 kg O / tonne Fe from FeO to Fe
Indirect Reduction
11
Figure Source: 4
At 1200 K, equilibrium CO/CO2 with FeO/Fe = 2.3/1 (or, %CO in CO + CO2 = 70%)
Equilibrium with FeO FeO + 3.3 CO = Fe + 2.3CO + CO2
Indirect reduction is FeO reduction with no solution loss Occurs at T < 1200 K
From stoichiometry: 1 t of Fe produced indirectly requires 760 kg C burned
at tuyeres to make CO.
Inefficient use of CO, high gas volume required
Equilibrium gas composition diagram shows the same information as the Ellingham diagram, just expressed in terms of volume % CO. Also known as a “fish tail” diagram.
Direct Reduction
12
Figure Source: 4
FeO + C= Fe + CO
Net reaction appears as though C directly reduces FeO
FeO + CO = CO2 + Fe
CO2 (g) + C(s) -> 2CO
FeO + C = Fe + CO
Solution loss plays a role
Only 322 kg C required
From the mass balance, appears efficient use of C
Huge fuel cost to make CO by solution loss reaction
Equilibrium gas composition diagram shows the same information as the Ellingham diagram, just expressed in terms of volume % CO. Also known as a “fish tail” diagram.
Wustite Reduction Rate Limiting
13
Figure Source: 4
Wustite reduction is rate limiting FeO + CO = Fe + CO2
CO2 (g) + C(s) -> 2CO (g)
Consider wustite as FeO for simplicity of analysis If 1 mole of Fe is made, then 1 mole of CO2 is made By solution loss, then 2 moles of CO are regenerated 2 moles of CO reduces 7.6 moles of FeO from Fe3O4
Corresponds to 100% direct reduction 100% indirect reduction:
1 mole of FeO makes 1 mol of CO2, 2.3 mol of CO remain
Only need ¼ ratio of CO/CO2 gas in Fe3O4 reduction to FeO
Satisfying FeO reduction satisfies higher oxide reduction
FeO reduction is rate limiting in 2 ways: 1. Strength of Gas required 2. Volume of reducing gas required
Equilibrium gas composition diagram shows the same information as the Ellingham diagram, just expressed in terms of volume % CO. Also known as a “fish tail” diagram.
Optimum Reduction
14
Figure Source: 4
Optimum reduction (from a mass balance perspective only!!) y kg of wustite O removed directly by C CO removes the rest (302-y) y / 16 = 3.3(302-y) /16 y =232 kg O 175 kg C (lowest C use ) 54% direct reduction
Stoichiometrically, this is possible
Heat balance implications for high solution loss means this is not achievable in practice True optimum comes from combined heat and mass
balance In fact, higher direct reduction in practice usually leads
to higher coke (ie, C) rates! (heat requirement) Out of scope for Materials 3F03 Assignment in Materials 4C03
Reduction by Hydrogen
15
Figure Source: 4
H2/H2O system analogous to CO/CO2
No Boudouard type reaction
CO has greater reducing potential at lower temperatures (less than 821⁰C)
Role of Coke in the BF
16
Figure Source: 2
Coke Plays an important role in every part of the BF
Mechanical Functions: Support for smooth burden descent Maintain permeability for high productivity Coke windows provide only means gas flow
through cohesive zone
Chemical Function: Minimize Direct reduction
More reactive coke -> more direct reduction, less coke available for burning at tuyere level
Sensible Heat Input Reductant
BF Heat Requirement
17
Figure Source: 4
Direct reduction uses less C than indirect, but requires much more heat
Major heat requirements: Iron Reduction Metalloid reduction Evaporation of moisture Calcination of raw fluxes Sensible heat for gases Sensible heat of HM, slag Heat losses to cooling system
Major Heat inputs: Combustion of Coke Combustion of Injected fuels: coal, NG, oil Sensible heat of hot blast (up to 1300⁰C) Slag formation
Major drive is to minimize Coke input
Hot Metal Chemistry
18
Figure Source: 2
Hot Metal is saturated in C, due to hearth conditions Hot metal in coke bed
Typical hot metal chemistry: 4.5 - 5.0 % C 0.3-1.0 % Si 0.1 – 0.7 % Mn 0.05-0.10 % S 0.01-0.08 % P
External desulphurization after BF is typical in industry
References 1 John Peacey and Bill Davenport, The Iron Blast Furnace, Pergamon, 1979
2 Geerdes et Al, Modern Blast furnace Ironmaking, an Introduction, 2009
3 Gaskell: introduction to the Thermodynamics of Materials
4: A. Biswas, Principles of Blast Furnace Ironmaking, Theory and Practice, 1981, Capter 3.6-3.12
Some of the information presented taken from Ironmaking slides in Materials 4C03, prepared by Dr. Gord Irons.