Jaromír Skorkovský KPH-ESF-MU Brno, Czech Republic Brno, 2015.
BINARIES - Key to Comprehension of the Universe, Brno, Czech Republic, June 8-12, 2009
-
Upload
madeson-buchanan -
Category
Documents
-
view
36 -
download
3
description
Transcript of BINARIES - Key to Comprehension of the Universe, Brno, Czech Republic, June 8-12, 2009
BINARIES - Key to Comprehension of the Universe, Brno, Czech Republic, June 8-12, 2009
Selim O. SELAMMesut YILMAZ
Ankara University Observatory
Hideyuki IZUMIURAOkayama Astrophysical Observatory-
NAOJ
Ilfan BIKMAEVKazan State University
Bun’ei SATOTokyo Institute of Technology
Eiji KAMBEOkayama Astrophysical Observatory-
NAOJ
Varol KESKİNEge University Observatory
??? ??? ?? ?? ? ? ?
? ?? ??? ???
? ? ??? ????
? ? ?? ? ??
? ?? ? ?
? ? ???
?
???? ???
??
??
???
??
? ?
HD 114762 (F9 V)Latham et al., 1989,
Nature, 339, 38
M sini = 11 Mjup
Porb = 84 days
i = ? a Brown Dwarf ?
Confirmed byMarcy in 1996
M sini = 11.02 Mjup
Porb = 84.03 daysa = 0.35 AU
Cephei (K1 IVe + M4V)
Campbell, Walker & Yang, 1988 ApJ, 331, 902
K = 25 m/s
Porb = 2.7 years
M sini = 1.7 Mjup
?
Orbital Phase
Vr
(km
/s)
Confirmed byHatzes et al., 2003,
ApJ, 599, 1383
M sini = 1.7 Mjup
Porb = 2.48 yearsa = 2.13 AU
Rad
ial v
elo
city
(m
/s)
Years
PSR 1257 + 12 Wolszczan & Frail, 1992, Nature, 355, 145
M sini : 3.4 M & 2.8 M
Porb : 66.6 days & 98.2 days
a : 0.36 AU & 0.47 AU
3th planet ?!
51 Peg bMayor & Queloz 1995
Nature, 378, 355
M sini = 0.47 Mjup
Porb = 4.231 days
a = 0.05 AU
G1 V
14.1 pc
70 Vir bMarcy & Butler 1996
ApJ, 464, L147
M sini = 6.6 Mjup
Porb = 116.6 days
a = 0.43 AU
G2.5 V
17.8 pc
47 UMa bButler & Marcy 1996
ApJ, 464, L153
M sini = 2.39 Mjup
Prot = 2.98 years
a = 2.1 AU
G0 V
5.1 pc
• Doppler Technique
• Astrometry
• Planetary Transits
• Microlensing
• Direct Imaging
• Timing
• Polarimetry
322 (>90% DT)
8
11
7
by 1st June 2009
59
0
348
Data from: Schneider J., 2009, http://exoplanet.eu
Data From: Schneider J., 2009, http://exoplanet.eu
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Doppler - As trom etry
Trans its
Microlens ing
Direct Im aging
Tim ing
M s
in i
(M
Ea
rth
)
Time of Discovery (years)
EARTH
NEPTUN
SATURN
JUPITER
621 3 1 1 6 1 7 11 19 12 34 25 28 32 28 62 = 34815
DOPPLER TECHNIQUE
Jupiter 12.4 m/sec
Saturn 2.7 m/sec
Earth 0.1 m/sec
Mercury 0.01 m/sec
rV
Limitations in precision of measured radial velocities arise
from spatial and temporal differences in the way of
obtaining the stellar and reference spectra
a) taken at different times
b) taken over different optical paths
c) flexture and thermal changes
in the spectrometer
1 km/s
Griffin & Griffin, 1973 (MNRAS, 162, 243 and MNRAS, 162, 255)
Telluric Lines ( 6800-7400 Å)
40 - 50 m/sn
FT
t
PAo
MonochromaticLight wave
1/P
Ao
Delta Function
1/P
AoPerfect
Spectrograph1/P
AoReal
Spectrograph
1/P
Ao
1/PInstrumental Profile
The instrumental profile produces a 2-4 pixel wide “BLURING” effect and can be represented with Gaussian profiles.
INSTRUMENTAL PROFILE (IP)
INSTRUMENTAL PROFILE (IP)
There is no problem with the IP if it not chance its character with time
stablesymmetic IP
stableasymmetic IP
IP with time dependentcharacter
V
V ~ 40-50 m/s
DOPPLER TECHNIQUE
A Thermally Stabilized Gas Absorption Cell
in the front of the entrance slit of a spectrograph
Iodine Cell (I2) gas filter
Butler et al., 1996, PASP, 108, 500
3 m/s ! (Lick 3m) 1 m/s ! (Keck 10m)
Overlays thousands of sharp I2 lines between 5000-6000 Å
onto stellar spectrum
THE MODEL
IPSAkI )()()(
I() : Observed “star+I2” composite spectrum
S() : Intrinsic stellar spectrum
: Stellar Doppler shift
A() : “Transmission function of the I2 Cell”- I2 template
IP : “Instrumental Profile” – produced by the 1D Point Spread Function of the detector
k : normalization factor
* : represents the convolution process made by FT
DOPPLER TECHNIQUE
(Butler et al., 1996, PASP, 108, 500 / Endl et al., 2000, A&Ap, 362, 585 / Takeda et al., 2002, PASJ, 54, 113 / Sato et al., 2002, PASJ, 54, 873)
The observed stellar spectrum through an I2-cell I() is expressed as the
product of intrinsic stellar spectrum S(), and the transmission function of
the I2-cell A() convolved with a modelled IP
THE MODEL
DOPPLER TECHNIQUE
The modeling process can be divided into the following three major steps (Endl et al., 2000):
Step 1: Reconstruction of instrumental effects and spectrograph instrumental profiles by modeling
pure iodine spectra using a high resolution Fourier Transform Spectrum (FTS) of the I2-cell.
Transmission function of the I2-cell, A() is also obtained at this step.
Step 2: Obtaining the “template” stellar spectra by deconvolving a pure star spectrum (taken without
the I2-cell) with the IPs reconstructed in step 1.
Step 3: Complete modeling of the star+I2 spectrum. Transmission function of the I2-cell from step 1
and the deconvolved “template” stellar spectrum from step 2 serve as model templates, A() and
S() to synthesize the observation. The Doppler shift between the iodine reference and the stellar
absorption lines is determined with high accuracy.
LICK GroupValenti et al., 1995, PASP, 107, 966Butler et al., 1996, PASP, 108, 500
ESO GroupEndl et al., 2000, A&Ap, 362, 585
OKAYAMA GroupTakeda et al., 2002, PASJ, 54, 113
Sato et al., 2002, PASJ, 54, 873
Turkish National Observatory (TUG)RTT150 Telescope - CES
Taurus Mountains-Bakirlitepe / Antalya, h=2500 m, 36º 49' 27“ N, 30º 20' 08“ Ehttp://www.tug.tubitak.gov.tr
RTT150 TelescopeØ = 1.5 meters
Coude f/48Cassegrain f/7.7
Coude Echelle Spectrograph (CES)R = / = 40 000
slit width = 1.5 arcsec (500 m) 3800 – 10000 Å (85 orders)
SAO-RAS 1Kx1K 16m pix LN cooled F.I. CCD
Registered wavelength interval on CCD 3900 – 8700 Å (68 orders)
To start exoplanet searches at Turkish National Observatory (TUG)we established an international collaboration
between Turkish-Russian-Japanese colleagues
An I2-Cell and its temperature controller was produced by our Japanese colleagues at Okayama Astrophysical Observatory (OAO)
and successfully integrated to RTT150-CES on OCTOBER 2007
(for technical details, see: Kambe et al., 2002, PASJ, 54, 865)
First Ligth with new I2-Cell26 October 2007
Test Observations
2007-II : TUG_RTT150.07.47 test
2008-I : TUG_RTT150.08.11 test
2008-II : TUG_RTT150.08.47 test + targets
2009-I : 09A_RTT150-439-2 test + targets
44 allocated nights distributed within 1.5 YEARS
Radial Velocity Standards
and
well known Planet-harboring Stars
whose RV behaviors are well established
within a few m/sn
Radial Velocity Standards Planet-harboring Stars
iot Per
tau Cet
ACHIEVED RV PRECISION
For V=3 mag stars under ~15 min. exposure time (S/N=200)
10-15 m/s
For V=6.5 mag stars under 30 min. exposure time (S/N=100)
~25 m/s
TARGET STARS OF OUR PROJECT50 G-type giants
showing RMS>25 m/s RV variation in previous RV surveys
• slow rotators, many sharp absorption lines
• relatively stable against pulsations
• relatively low surface activity