BG EN BG EN izdania/BROSHURA-3.pdf · 1 Ñúäúðæàíèå Contents 1. Äóìè íà...

çà ðàçêðèâàíå íà äîêóìåíòèòå è çà îáÿâÿâàíå íàïðèíàäëåæíîñò íà áúëãàðñêè ãðàæäàíè êúì Äúðæàâíà

ñèãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæáèíà Áúëãàðñêàòà íàðîäíà àðìèÿ

BG EN BG ENBG EN

for Disclosing the Documents and Announcing Affiliationof Bulgarian Citizens to the State Security

and the Intelligence Services of the Bulgarian National Army

Равносметка с поглед напредРавносметка с поглед напредLooking back and forwardLooking back and forward

ÊÐÄÎÏÁÃÄÑÐÑÁÍÀÊÐÄÎÏÁÃÄÑÐÑÁÍÀ

ДЕКЛАСИФИЦИРАНДЕКЛАСИФИЦИРАН

§ 17§ 17

от от ЗДРДОПБГДСРСБНАЗДРДОПБГДСРСБНА

Мандат 2012–2017Мандат 2012–20172012–20172012–2017

ÊÐÄÎÏÁÃÄÑÐÑÁÍÀÊÐÄÎÏÁÃÄÑÐÑÁÍÀ

ДЕКЛАСИФИЦИРАНДЕКЛАСИФИЦИРАН

§ 17§ 17

от от ЗДРДОПБГДСРСБНАЗДРДОПБГДСРСБНА

Òåë.:+359 2/8004 506 • Ôàêñ:+359 2/8004 500 • Ñîôèÿ, óë. „Âðàá÷à“ 1 • [email protected].:+359 2/8004 506 • Fax:+359 2/8004 500 • Vrabcha 1 Str., Sofia, Bulgaria • [email protected]: www.comdos.bg

1

ÑúäúðæàíèåContents

1. Äóìè íà ïðåäñåäàòåëÿ: „Çàâåñàòà å âäèãíàòà“ 2 Opening words of the Chairman: ‘The curtain is lifted’

2. Êîìèñèÿòà 4 The Committee

3. Çàêîíúò ïîâåëÿâà 13 The law

4. Íàøèòå ïðàâèëà 21 Our rules

5. Åêèï îò ïðîôåñèîíàëèñòè 24 A team of professionals

6. Ïðåäèñòîðèÿòà 25 Background

7. Ðàâíîñìåòêàòà (2007 – 2012 ã.) 29 Stocktaking 2007−2012

8. Öåëè è ìèñèÿ íà Ìàíäàò 2012–2017 ã. 38 Goals and mission 2012–2017

9. Ïàðòíüîðñòâà 43 Partnerships

10. Ïîãëåäúò íà îáùåñòâîòî 46 The view of the public

11. Ðå÷íèê 51 Glossary

2

Çàâåñàòà å âäèãíàòà

Êîãàòî ïîëèòè÷åñêèòå ñèëè â Áúëãàðèÿ ñëåä äúëãà è ìú÷èòåëíà äèñêóñèÿ ñòèãíàõà äî ñúãëàñèå äîêóìåíòèòå íà áèâøèòå òàéíè ñëóæáè äà ñå ñúáåðàò è ñúõðàíÿò çà èñòîðèÿòà, à ãðàæäàíèòå äà ïîëó÷àò äîñòúï äî òÿõ, ìíîçèíà íå âÿðâàõà, ÷å òîâà ùå ñå ñëó÷è. Îòíîøåíèåòî èì áå êàòî êúì ïîðåäíèÿ ìúðòâî ðîäåí çàêîí, êîéòî ñêîðî ñëåä ãëàñóâàíåòî ìó ùå çàáóêñóâà, ùå áúäå îòìåíåí, à îáùåñòâåíîòî ñúçíàíèå ùå áúäå îòíîâî ïðèñïàíî.

Äíåñ, åäâà ëè èìà ÷îâåê, êîéòî äà ñå ñúìíÿâà, ÷å òîâà âå÷å å âúçìîæíî. Ñ äåéíîñòòà ñè êîìèñèÿòà äîêàçà, ÷å Çàêîíúò çà äîñòúï è ðàçêðèâàíå íà äîêóìåíòèòå è çà îáÿâÿâàíå íà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò íà áúëãàðñêè ãðàæäàíè êúì Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà Áúëãàðñêàòà íàðîäíà àðìèÿ å ðàáîòåù è ñòðèêòíî ñå ïðèëàãà.

Íàé-ïîñëå õîðàòà âå÷å ðåàëíî ñå äîêîñâàò äî äúëáîêî ïàçåíèòå ïîä ãðèôîâå çà ñåêðåòíîñò äîêóìåíòè. Âÿðíî å, ÷å åäíè ïîëó÷èõà îãðîìíî ðàçî÷àðîâàíèå ïîðàäè îñâåòåíàòà èì òàéíà çàâèñèìîñò îò ñåêðåòíèòå ñëóæáè íà êîìóíèñòè÷åñêàòà âëàñò, íî âÿðíî å è òîâà, ÷å äðóãè ïîëó÷èõà òàêà äúëãî ÷àêàíàòà ñïðàâåäëèâîñò çà îêàçâàíàòà âúðõó òÿõ ïîëèòè÷åñêà ðåïðåñèÿ.

Èñòèíàòà, êàçâàò, ÷å áîëè. Íî ñàìî ïðè íåéíîòî ìàêñèìàëíî ðàçêðèâàíå ìîæå äà ñå ïèøå îáåêòèâíà èñòîðèÿ. Óìåíèåòî íà åäíî îáùåñòâî äà ÷åòå çàäúëáî÷åíî èñòîðèÿòà ñè, äà ÿ àíàëèçèðà è äà èçâëè÷à ïîóêè îò íåÿ, å äîáúð çàëîã çà íåãîâîòî ïî-äîáðî áúäåùå.

Â íà÷àëîòî íà ñâîÿòà ðàáîòà Êîìèñèÿòà ÷åñòíî ïðåäóïðåäè õîðàòà äà íå î÷àêâàò îò íåÿ äà áúäå òðèáóíàë èëè êðèòèê. Ïîñòàâè ñè çà çàäà÷à ñàìî äà âäèãíå çàâåñàòà, çàä êîÿòî ñå êðèå èñòèíàòà. Îñòàâè íà ïóáëèêàòà äà èçáèðà äàëè äà ðúêîïëÿñêà èëè äà îñâèðêâà àêòüîðèòå, ðåæèñèðàíè îò íÿêîãàøíèòå òàéíè ñëóæáè. Åòî, ÷å çàâåñàòà å âäèãíàòà. Âëàñòòà å ïî-ïðîçðà÷íà, çàäêóëèñíèòå çàâèñèìîñòè îò ìèíàëîòî ñà âñå ïî-îãðàíè÷åíè. Îáùåñòâîòî èìà ñâîáîäàòà äà îöåíÿâà. Íåãîâî ïðàâî å äà ñúäè ïî ñâîÿòà ìîðàëíà ñêàëà. Êàêâî ïo-äåìîêðàòè÷íî îò òîâà?!

3

The curtain is lifted

When long and intense political consultations culminated in an agreement to collect and preserve the written legacy of the former Bulgarian secret services for history’s sake, under a policy of open and free access, many were skeptical. Domestic audiences were unimpressed with what they believed to be another attempt to dull the collective consciousness and memory with short-lived leg-islation. The law was pronounced dead at conception, and the general opinion was that it would soon be repealed as a failed piece of law-making.

Today, there are hardly any skeptics left to doubt the effects of this action. Within its competence, the Committee has succeeded to effectively and strictly implement the Law on Access to and Disclosure of the Documents and An-nouncement of Affiliation of Bulgarian Citizens to the State Security and the Intelligence Services of the Bulgarian National Army.

Access to the secret world of classified documents is no longer an illusion but a reality. While some were greatly disappointed with their affiliation to the com-munist secret services being publicly announced, justice was finally restored for others who had been victims of political repressions and persecution.

While the truth hurts, acknowledging the truth in its entirety is the best way for-ward and the only credible instrument to examine past events as objectively as possible. Society’s best hope for a better future lies with its ability to engage in an in-depth reflection on its history, analyse and learn from the past.

From the beginning of its mandate, the Committee refused to live up to the expectations to be a judge or a critic. It had the specific task to pull back the curtain and report the truth as it happened. It was left to the audience to choose whether to cheer or jeer the actors dancing on the strings of their SS puppet masters. The curtain is lifted. Government is more transparent now; backstage bargaining of the past takes place less frequently. Members of our society are free to make choices while staying true to their moral compass. What is more democratic than that?!

4

Êîìèñèÿòà The Committee

Êîìèñèÿòà å íåçàâèñèì äúðæàâåí îðãàí, êîéòî îñèãóðÿâà äîñòúï, ðàçêðèâà, èç-

ïîëçâà, ñúõðàíÿâà è ñå ðàçïîðåæäà ñ äîêó-ìåíòèòå íà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíà-âàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà Áúëãàðñêàòà íàðîäíà àðìèÿ. Ðàáîòàòà º å îòêðèòà è ïðîçðà÷íà, çàùîòî âñÿêî âçåòî îò íåÿ ðåøåíèå ñå êà÷-âà íà èíòåðíåò ñòðàíèöàòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà, à äåéíîñòòà º ñå îò÷èòà íà âñåêè øåñò ìåñå-öà ïðåä Íàðîäíîòî ñúáðàíèå.Ïî çàêîí ÷ëåíîâåòå íà Êîìèñèÿòà íå òðÿá-âà äà èìàò ïðèíàäëåæíîñò êúì Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è êúì ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæ-áè íà ÁÍÀ, êàêòî è äà íå ñà ñëóæèòåëè íà äíåøíèòå ñïåöèàëíè ñëóæáè. Ëóñòðàöèÿ, â ñìèñúë íà ó÷àñòèå â èçáîðíè è âëàñòî-âè ñòðóêòóðè íà õîðà ñ ïðèíàäëåæíîñò êúì ÄÑ è ÐÑ íà ÁÍÀ, å ïðèëîæåíà ñàìî â òîçè çàêîí. Äðóãîòî óñëîâèå å äà èìàò ðàçðåøå-íèå çà äîñòúï äî êëàñèôèöèðàíà èíôîðìà-öèÿ. ×ëåíîâåòå íà Êîìèñèÿòà ñå èçáèðàò ñ ìàíäàò îò 5 ãîäèíè.Ïðåç àïðèë 2012 ã. èçòå÷å ïúðâèÿò ìàíäàò íà Êîìèñèÿòà, à ïðåç ìàé 2012 ã. 41-òî Íà-ðîäíî ñúáðàíèå èçáðà íîâ ñúñòàâ – Ìàíäàò âòîðè. Çà ïðåäñåäàòåë íà Êîìèñèÿòà áåøå èçáðàí Åâòèì Êîñòàäèíîâ (âòîðè ìàíäàò), çà çàìåñòíèê-ïðåäñåäàòåë – Àéðóø Õàä-æè, à çà ñåêðåòàð – Ìàðèàíà Äàðàê÷èåâà. Çà ÷ëåíîâå íà Êîìèñèÿòà áÿõà èçáðàíè Àïîñòîë Äèìèòðîâ (âòîðè ìàíäàò), Áîðèñ Ìèõàéëîâ, Ãåîðãè Ïàíãàðîâ, Âàíÿ Æåêîâà, Åêàòåðèíà Áîí÷åâà (âòîðè ìàíäàò) è Îðõàí Èñìàèëîâ (âòîðè ìàíäàò). Âúïðåêè ðàçëè÷íîòî ïîëèòè÷åñêî ïðåä-ñòàâèòåëñòâî íà ÷ëåíîâåòå íà Êîìèñèÿòà, îáùîòî â òÿõíàòà ìîòèâàöèÿ îñòàâà ñòðèêò-íîòî ïðèëàãàíå íà çàêîíà è ðàçêðèâàíåòî íà èñòèíàòà çà áèâøèòå òàéíè ñëóæáè ïðåä îáùåñòâîòî.

The Committee is an independent body en-trusted with ensuring access to, disclos-

ing, using, keeping and handling the archives of the former state security and the intelli-gence services of the Bulgarian National Army (BNA). The principles of accountability and transparency apply to every aspect of work. All resolutions are published on the website of the Committee, while activity reports are produced and submitted to the National As-sembly on a semi-annual basis.The members of the Committee must meet the criteria to have no former connections to the State Security and the intelligence ser-vices of the BNA, and to not be employees of the special services of today. The principle of lustration, as far as membership of persons affiliated to the State Security and BNA intel-ligence services in election and government structures is concerned, is only employed in the relevant law. Authorisation to access clas-sified information is a further requirement for membership. Committee members are elect-ed for a five-year term.This Committee’s first term of office ended in April 2012. Second mandate members were chosen in May 2012 by the 41st National As-sembly as follows: Evtim Kostadinov (Chair-person, second term), Ayrush Hadzhi (Deputy Chairperson), Mariana Darakchieva (Secre-tary), and members Apostol Dimitrov (sec-ond term), Boris Mihaylov, Georgi Pangarov, Vanya Zhekova, Ekaterina Boncheva (second term), Orhan Ismailov (second term). Regardless of their political affiliation, all members of the Committee are united by the simple motivation to strictly follow the law and publicly expose the truth about the former se-cret services.

5

Evtim Kostadinov, Chairman

T o say the truth out loud is the hardest thing to do. It is even harder when this truth is painful,

affects human lives, undermines people’s trust, and generates social tension. This I wrote in my statement of motivation as a first-term Chairman of the Committee. The truth of these words is ap-parent to me now more than ever. It can be difficult, sometimes to the extremes. But I also learned that only the truth in its most essential form, unbur-dened by emotion or personal and political bias, can tell the story as it happened. It is the proper way to look at the past with no prejudice in mind and draw lessons for the future.

Within its first term of office the Committee pur-sued strict application of the law and largely ac-complished the main tasks entrusted thereto: determining and announcing affiliation of public figures to the former secret services, ensuring open access to their classified records, and estab-lishing centralised archives for their safekeeping. This second mandate is meant to carry through the process. We will continue our extensive ef-forts, on an even larger scale, to update public knowledge on the architects of the transition pe-

ÊîìèñèÿòàThe Committee

Åâòèì Êîñòàäèíîâ, ïðåäñåäàòåë

Ï ðåç ïúðâèÿ ìàíäàò îò ìîåòî ïðåäñåäà-òåëñòâî â ìîòèâàöèÿòà ñè çà ðàáîòà

â Êîìèñèÿòà áÿõ íàïèñàë, ÷å íàé-òðóäíî å, êîãàòî èñòèíàòà ñå èçðè÷à íà ãëàñ. Îñîáå-íî êîãàòî òÿ å áîëåçíåíà, çàñÿãà ÷îâåøêè ñúäáè, ðóøè äîâåðèå, ïîðàæäà îáùåñòâåíî íàïðåæåíèå. Äíåñ, îò äèñòàíöèÿòà íà âðå-ìåòî, îùå ïî-ñèëíî óñåòèõ, ÷å òîâà å òàêà. Íå ñàìî å òðóäíî, à ïîíÿêîãà äîðè å ìíîãî òðóäíî. Íî ðàçáðàõ îùå, ÷å ñàìî êîãàòî îñ-âåòåíàòà èñòèíà íå å ïîäâëàñòíà íà åìîöè-èòå, íå å çàáóëâàíà îò ëè÷íè è ïîëèòè÷åñêè èíòåðåñè, à å ïðèçâàíà äà ðàçêàæå èñòîðèÿ-òà òàêàâà, êàêâàòî å áèëà, ìîæå îáåêòèâíî äà áúäå îñìèñëåíî ìèíàëîòî è äà áúäàò èç-âëå÷åíè íàé-âàæíèòå ïîóêè çà áúäåùåòî.Ïðåç ïúðâèÿ ìàíäàò Êîìèñèÿòà ñëåäâàøå ñòðèêòíî çàêîíà è äî ãîëÿìà ñòåïåí èçïúë-íè ñâîèòå îñíîâíè çàäà÷è – äà óñòàíîâÿâà è îáÿâÿâà çàâèñèìîñòèòå îò áèâøèòå òàé-íè ñëóæáè íà ïóáëè÷íèòå ëèöà, äà îñèãóðè äîñòúï íà õîðàòà äî äîêóìåíòèòå íà òåçè ñëóæáè è äà èçãðàäè öåíòðàëèçèðàí àðõèâ, â êîéòî äà ãè ñúõðàíè. Âòîðèÿò ìàíäàò íà Êî-ìèñèÿòà å ïðèçâàí äà äîâåäå íåùàòà äîêðàé.

6

riod that shaped social awareness. To help soci-ety arrive, as close as possible, to the truth about the identity, methods, motivation and objectives of behind-the-scenes power actors, is crucial to understanding why Bulgarian transition turned out the way it did. As new opportunities emerge for growing public exposure of the archives, so take shape the foundations of a future Institute for Na-tional Remembrance.

Ñ îùå ïî-ïðåöèçíà è øèðîêî ìàùàáíà ðàáî-òà íèå ùå òðÿáâà äà ïðîäúëæèì äà èíôîð-ìèðàìå îáùåñòâîòî êàêâè ñà õîðàòà, êîèòî ñà áèëè íà÷åëî íà äúðæàâàòà â ãîäèíèòå íà ïðåõîäà è ñà ôîðìèðàëè íåãîâîòî ñúçíàíèå. Äà ïîìîãíåì çà äîñòèãàíå äî íàé-òî÷íèÿ îò-ãîâîð íà âúïðîñà êîé, êàê, äàëè è ñ êàêâà öåë çàäêóëèñíî å äúðïàë êîíöèòå íà âëàñòòà, çà-ùîòî ñàìî òàêà ùå ìîæåì äà ðàçáåðåì çàùî â Áúëãàðèÿ ïðåõîäúò ñå ñëó÷è èìåííî ïî òîçè íà÷èí. Ñ ïðåäîñòàâÿíåòî íà âñå ïî-ãîëåìè âúçìîæíîñòè çà ïóáëè÷íîñò íà àðõèâíèòå äîêóìåíòè ùå ñå ïîñòàðàåì äà ïîäãîòâèì îñíîâèòå íà åäèí áúäåù Èíñòèòóò çà íàöè-îíàëíà ïàìåò.

Ayrush Hadzhi,Deputy Chairperson

F rom my deep personal ex-periences I find motivation

to work and be part of the Com-mittee. The list of reasons is long; long enough to be consis-tent with a life with more than its fair share of hardship. Both in terms of time and pain, righ-teous anger, fight for human rights and freedoms.

As I close my eyes and look back in time they flash before me, first stories around the fireplace, sights and memories of defending my name and religion, the sense of violated dignity, five years of imprisonment, horror of solitary confinement, tor-ture, humiliation... Strangely how the pain of it all did not break me, but instead made me stronger. Then 10 November 1989 came with my faith in justice restored. My dream of democracy came true and another truth dawned upon me: freedom, especially one coupled with authority, is a tough moral burden to bear.

Àéðóø Õàäæè,çàìåñòíèê-ïðåäñåäàòåë

Ïðè÷èíèòå, êîèòî ìå ìî-òèâèðàò äà ðàáîòÿ â

Êîìèñèÿòà, ñà ìíîãî. Ìíîãî ñà, çàùîòî æèòåéñêèÿò ìè ïúò å äúëúã. Ïðèçíàâàì – è òðóäåí. Íå äúëúã åäèíñòâå-íî êàòî îòðÿçúê âðåìå, à êàòî íàòðóïàíà áîëêà, ãíÿâ çà ñïðàâåäëèâîñò, áîðáà çà ÷îâåøêè ïðàâà è ñâîáîäè.Êàòî ñå âúðíà íàçàä è çà-òâîðÿ î÷è, ïðåä ìåí èçïëóâàò ïúðâèòå ðàç-êàçè êðàé áàùèíîòî îãíèùå, âèäÿíîòî è ïðåæèâÿíîòî â çàùèòà íà èìå è ðåëèãèÿ, ïîòúïêàíîòî ëè÷íî äîñòîéíñòâî, ïåòòå ãî-äèíè çàòâîð, óæàñúò â êàðöåðà, ìú÷åíèÿòà, óíèæåíèÿòà... Ñòðàííî, íî ñòðàäàíèåòî íå ñàìî íå ìå ïðåêúðøè, à ìå íàïðàâè ïî-ñèëåí. È êîãàòî íà 10 íîåìâðè 1989 ãîäèíà âÿðàòà ìè â ñïðàâåäëèâîñòòà âúçòúðæåñòâóâà, êî-ãàòî ñå ñáúäíà ìå÷òàòà ìè çà äåìîêðàöèÿ, ïðîçðÿõ äðóãà åäíà èñòèíà – ñâîáîäàòà, à îñîáåíî ñú÷åòàíàòà ñ âëàñò ñâîáîäà, å òå-æúê ìîðàëåí òîâàð.


AAAAyDDDe

to mlonteitsin terig

7


I believe that political power must go hand in hand with morality. I yearningly waited to see this moral-ity in action. It was unacceptable that a true demo-crat at heart could be like a coin – two-faced. I needed to re-examine the nature of men. Why are we the way we are? Who made us that way? How does this development take place?... I wish for my efforts to help fostering a culture free of puppet strings in life and politics. I look forward towards the revival of the ideal of democracy we used to fight for. It is human to err, but a man must be big enough to admit his mistakes, smart enough to profit from them, and strong enough to correct them.

Mariana Darakchieva,Secretary

M y transition from life in the province to the

benches of the 41st Nation-al Assembly, and now the Committee for the Secret Police Files, was guided and motivated by the con-cept of Truth. What are the nature and dimensions thereof? What is its part in life’s design and how it in-terferes with human exis-

tence?I found out that the Truth was almost always stifled by deceit, but never subdued in the end. Yet, the lack of morality is not a crime in the big books of law. Law covers all types of crime, but immoral is not illegal, and immorality never made it to court. Quite on the contrary, the court, the law, society have always dealt with its victims only, for the law does not concern itself with the unseen, but with the works of the wicked.

Immorality is like the devil. It exists, but cannot be

Çà ìåí â ïîëèòèêàòà íå ìîæå áåç ìîðàë. Æà-äóâàõ äà âèäÿ òîçè ìîðàë. Íå ìîæåõ äà ïðèå-ìà, ÷å èñòèíñêèÿò äåìîêðàò ìîæå äà å êàòî ìîíåòèòå – ñ äâå ëèöà. Íàëîæè ñå îòíîâî äà èçñëåäâàì ÷îâåêà. Äà ñå ïèòàì, çàùî å òàêúâ, êîé è êàê ãî å ïðàâèë è ïðàâè òàêúâ... Ñ ðàáîòàòà ñè â Êîìèñèÿòà áèõ èñêàë äà ïðå÷èñòèì îáùåñòâîòî îò çàäêóëèñèåòî â æèâîòà è â ïîëèòèêàòà. Äà ïîìîãíåì çà âúç-ðàæäàíåòî íà èäåàëà çà îíàçè äåìîêðàöèÿ, çà êîÿòî ñå áîðèõìå. ×îâåê ÷åñòî ãðåøè, âàæíî å äà íàìåðè ñèëè äà áúäå äîñòàòú÷íî ãîëÿì è äà ïðèçíàå ãðåøêèòå ñè, äîñòàòú÷íî óìåí, çà äà ñïå÷åëè îò òÿõ è äîñòàòú÷íî ñèëåí, çà äà ãè ïîïðàâè.

Ìàðèàíà Äàðàê÷èåâà,ñåêðåòàð

Â ïúòÿ îò ïðîâèíöèàëíèÿ ãðàä äî ïîçèöèÿòà íà

äåïóòàò â 41-òî Íàðîäíî ñúáðàíèå, à ñåãà è â Êîìèñèÿ-òà ïî äîñèåòàòà, ìå âîäåøå è ñòèìóëèðàøå ìèñúëòà çà Èñòèíàòà. Êàêâà å òÿ, êàê-âè ñà èçìåðåíèÿòà º, êúäå â êîîðäèíàòíàòà ñèñòåìà íà Æèâîòà ñå âìåñòâà òÿ è êàê ïðîìåíÿ ÷îâåøêîòî íè ñú-ùåñòâóâàíå?Óáåäèõ ñå, ÷å ïî÷òè âèíàãè Èñòèíàòà å áèëà çàäóøàâàíà îò ïîäëîñòòà, çàäóøàâàíà, íî íå è óíèùîæåíà. Â äåáåëèòå òîìîâå íà çàêî-íà åäèíñòâåíî ïîäëîñòòà íÿìà ñâîÿòà íàêà-çàòåëíà àëèíåÿ. Çàêîíúò å ñëîæèë ðúêà âúðõó âñè÷êè ïðåñòúïëåíèÿ, íî ïîäëîñòòà íèêîãà íå å âëèçàëà â ñúäà êàòî îáâèíÿåì. Îáðàòíî-òî – ñúäúò, çàêîíúò, îáùåñòâîòî âèíàãè ñà ñå çàíèìàâàëè ñàìî ñ íåéíèòå æåðòâè. Çàùî-òî çàêîíúò íå ñå çàíèìàâà ñ íåâèäèìîòî, à ñ äåÿíèÿòà íà ãðåøíèòå.Ïîäëîñòòà å êàòî ñàòàíàòà – òÿ ñúùåñò-

MMSSSe

beal CoPoanceththlifete

t ?á

8

âóâà, íî íå ñå âèæäà, íå ñå äîêàçâà. Ñðåä-ñòâàòà íà ïîäëåöà ñà ìîðàëíè, èçâúí ôàê-òèòå. Äîêàòî îáùåñòâîòî êðåùè: „Äîëó ïîäëîñòòà!“, ïîäëåöèòå âúðâÿò íàãîðå. Òîâà å çàêîí – åäèí îò ñúâúðøåíèòå çàêîíè íà íå-ñúâúðøåíèÿ ðåä íà çåìÿòà.È âñå ïàê, êîëêîòî è íåâúçìîæíî, èëþçîðíî äà èçãëåæäà, àç íå ñúì çàãóáèëà âÿðàòà, ÷å óáèåöúò íà èñòèíàòà è âñè÷êî ìîðàëíî ÷èñ-òî ìîæå äà áúäå, àêî íå óíèùîæåí, ïîíå äå-ìàñêèðàí.Áåçêîìïðîìèñíàòà ðàáîòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà ùå âúçñòàíîâè Èñòèíàòà çà âðåìåòî è çà ëè÷-íîñòèòå â íåãî. Çàùîòî, ìàêàð ïðåñëåäâàíà è éåçóèòñêè ïðåèíà÷àâàíà, òÿ ñúùåñòâóâà âúâ âðåìåòî, à òî å çàêîí, êîéòî íèêîé íå ìîæå äà ñïðå. „...È ùå ïîçíàåòå Èñòèíàòà è Èñòèíàòà ùå íè íàïðàâè ñâîáîäíè“ å êàçàë ìåñèÿòàÈèñóñ.

Àïîñòîë Äèìèòðîâ,÷ëåí

È ìàõ äîñòàòú÷íè îñíîâàíèÿ, è îáùåñòâåíè, è ëè÷íè, çà äà

ñå îòêàæà îò äåïóòàòñêèÿ ñè ìàíäàò â 40-îòî Íàðîäíî ñúáðà-íèå è äà ïðèåìà ïðåäëîæåíèåòî çà ÷ëåí íà Êîìèñèÿòà. Ðåøåíèå-òî ìè íå ðàçáðàõà äîðè íàé-áëèçêèòå ìè õîðà è ïðèÿòåëè. Åäèí îò îñíîâíèòå ìè ìîòèâè áå äà íàó÷à èñòèíàòà çà ÄÑ. Íå ñêðèâàì, ÷å ñúì èçïèòâàë ðåñïåêò è óâàæåíèå êúì èí-ñòèòóöèÿòà, îòãîâîðíà çà íàöèîíàëíàòà ñèãóðíîñò.Äíåñ îöåíêàòà ìè çà íåÿ íå å åäíîçíà÷íà.À íà òåçè, êîèòî êðèòèêóâàò çàêîíà è îìà-ëîâàæàâàò äåéíîñòòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà, ùå ïðèïîìíÿ åäíà ìèñúë íà Áåëèíñêè, ÷å „...íàé-ãîð÷èâàòà èñòèíà å ïî-äîáðà îò íàé-ïðèÿò-íîòî çàáëóæäåíèå...“ .

seen, cannot be proven. The means of the immor-al are beyond the facts. Men of immorality climb up the ladder of public success while the world screams, ‘Down with deceit!’ It is a rule. It is one of the perfect laws guiding the flawed order of hu-man affairs.

However slim the chances, I still have faith that the enemies of truth and integrity can be, at the very least unmasked and exposed, if not eradicated.With careful consideration of its duties, the Com-mittee is set to restore the Truth about events and people of the past. Persecuted and distorted for the sake of ideology, the Truth does not cease to exist. It is the law of nature and the way of the world.

In the words of the Messiah, ‘........and ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall make you free’.

Apostol Dimitrov,Member of the Committee

I had many reasons, both private and public, to give up my term

of office as a member of the 40th National Assembly and assume membership in the Committee. Even those closest to me, relatives

and friends alike, could not understand why I had come to this decision. I was mostly driven by the motivation to find out the truth about the State Se-curity. I admit to have had feelings of respect for the institution that was responsible for our nation’s safety.

Today, I take more than one perspective to the is-sue.There are those who find faults in the law and un-dermine the work of the Committee. I ask them to recall the words of Belinsky, ‘The bitterer truth is better than the most pleasant error’.


AAApMMMe

aof NamEv

9

Boris Mihaylov,Member of the Committee

There are numerous State Security myths and miscon-

ceptions circulating in public discourse. The topic of secret police files is surrounded by am-biguity and shrouded in specu-lations. I approach the subject with the curiosity of a child and the focus of a young man, un-burdened by the baggage of the past, free of prejudice, as-

sumptions, preconceptions and judgement. It is the truth I am interested in. The truth about the State Security as it was: its nature, its faces, its impact on every dimension of societal relations. I want to know if repressions took place and who was involved. I want to find out what, how and, above all, why? Answers to these questions will lay my mind to rest, knowing that what we have done has not been in vain.

Vanya Zhekova,Member of the Committee

For as long as I can remember, I have been fascinated with

the idea of human dignity. I appre-ciate the true value of people fac-ing their fate with heads held high. They will go down in history in full appreciation of their merit.

The past has a life of its own and we have to rise to the challenge of making mean-ing of that past. It projects itself into the future


Áîðèñ Ìèõàéëîâ,÷ëåí

Â îáùåñòâåíîòî íè ïðîñ-òðàíñòâî áèòóâàò ìíî-

ãî ìèòîâå è ìèñòåðèè çà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò. Êàòî ìëàä è íåîáðåìåíåí ÷îâåê ïðèñòúïâàì êúì òåìàòà çà äîñèåòàòà ñ äåòñêî ëþáî-ïèòñòâî, íî ñúùî òàêà è áåç ïðåäðàçñúäúöè, áåç ïðåäâà-ðèòåëíà íàãëàñà, áåç ïðåä-âàðèòåëíî ìíåíèå è îöåíêà. Äúðæà äà çíàì èñòèíàòà. Èñòèíàòà çà òîâà êàêâî å áèëà ÄÑ, êîè ëèöà ñà áèëè ÄÑ, êàêâî å áèëî è å òÿõíîòî âëèÿíèå âúðõó îáùåñòâåíè-òå íè îòíîøåíèÿ â ðàçëè÷íèòå ñôåðè. Èñêàì äà çíàì ðåïðåñèðàëà ëè å ÄÑ, êàê, êîãî è íàé-âå÷å çàùî. Êîãàòî ïîëó÷à îòãîâîð íà òåçè âúïðîñè, ùå çíàì, ÷å ñúì èçïúëíèë ìàíäàòà ñè óñïåøíî.

Âàíÿ Æåêîâà,÷ëåí

Î òêàêòî ñå ïîìíÿ, ìå âúëíó-âà òåìàòà çà ÷îâåøêîòî

äîñòîéíñòâî. Öåííîñò çà ìåí ñà õîðàòà, êîèòî ïîñðåùàò ñâîÿòà ñóðîâà ó÷àñò ñ âèñîêî èçïðàâåíè ÷åëà. Òå ùå îñòàíàò â èñòîðèÿòà ïî íà÷èí, êîéòî èì ñå ïîëàãà.Ìèíàëîòî èìà ñâîé æèâîò è íè ïðåäèçâèêâà äà ãî îñìèñëÿìå. Òî ïðèñúñòâà â íàñòîÿùåòî ñ âúïðîñèòå çà óÿçâèìîñòòà,

BBoMM

cedispobiglatwithbuth

sumptions preconceâ

VVVVaMMM

thciaingThap

Th

10


íàãàæäàíåòî, ïîäëîñòòà, ïðåäàòåëñòâîòî, ïðîøêàòà.Íå íè å íóæíî äà îìàëîâàæàâàìå èëè äà ïðå-óâåëè÷àâàìå çíà÷åíèåòî íà ôàêòèòå è ñúáè-òèÿòà. Ìèñëÿ, ÷å å ïîòðåáíî äà ãè ïîçíàâàìå, äà èìàìå ïàìåò çà òÿõ. Êîãàòî ñå âïóñíåì â êèëîìåòðèòå ñòðàíèöè çà ìåòîäèòå íà Äúð-æàâíà ñèãóðíîñò, ïðåä íàñ ñå îòêðèâà õîðè-çîíò – äà ñè èçãðàäèì ïîçèöèÿ íà ñâîáîäíè ãðàæäàíè.Âðåìå å äà ïëàòèì öåíàòà – äà ãîâîðèì îò ñâîå èìå è äà ïî÷óâñòâàìå ñâîáîäàòà âúòðå â íàñ!

Ãåîðãè Ïàíãàðîâ,÷ëåí

Îòäàë ñúì ïî-ãîëÿìà ÷àñò îò æèâîòà ñè â ñëóæáà íà

äúðæàâàòà, â ñèñòåìàòà çà ñèãóðíîñò. Áèë ñúì è îò äâå-òå ñòðàíè íà áàðèêàäàòà, àêî ìîæå ïî òîçè íà÷èí äà ñå ïåðè-ôðàçèðà íàñòðîéêàòà íà îáùå-ñòâîòî ïî òåìàòà çà äîñèåòà-òà è òÿõíîòî ðàçñåêðåòÿâàíå. Îïèòúò ïîêàçà, ÷å „îòâàðÿíåòî íà äîñèåòà-òà“ áå íåîáõîäèì è íåîáðàòèì ïðîöåñ. Îò-ãîâîðíîñòòà êàê ùå áúäàò ïðî÷åòåíè òåçè ñòðàíèöè îò âå÷íàòà è íåâúçâðàòèìà èñòî-ðèÿ ñåãà å íàøà. Ïðèëàãàíåòî íà çàêîíà çà äîñèåòàòà òúðñè îáåêòèâíàòà è íåïîäïðà-âåíà èñòèíà çà òàçè èñòîðèÿ. Äàëè ùå áúäåì áåçïðèñòðàñòíè, òàêà êàêòî ïîâåëÿâàò çà-êîíúò è î÷àêâàíèÿòà íà õîðàòà, èçáðàëè íè äà ãî ïðèëîæèì, èëè ùå âëèçàìå â èçëèøíè ïî-ëåìèêè, êîèòî îòâàðÿò ñòàðè ðàíè?! Êóòèÿ-òà íà Ïàíäîðà âå÷å å îòâîðåíà. Íåêà èçâúð-âèì ñâîÿ ïúò äî èñòèíñêàòà Ãîëãîòà, çà äà ïîñòèãíå îáùåñòâîòî ïîêîÿ è ïîìèðåíèåòî, îò êîèòî òàêà ñèëíî ñå íóæäàå.

raising questions as to matters of vulnerability, self-interest, treachery, betrayal, forgiveness.

We need not undermine or overstate the implica-tion of facts and events. It is good to know and remember though. As we embark on a search through thousands of pages of secret documents, we are free of restrictions. We can address issues and form opinions as thinking, free individuals.

It is time to pay the price: to speak on our own be-half and to experience freedom within ourselves!

Georgi Pangarov,Member of the Committee

I have devoted the better part of my life to service in the field of

national security. I have been, so to speak, on both sides of the bar-ricade of public opinion on the mat-ter of secret police files and their availability to the public.

Experience has shown that disclo-sure of the files is a necessary development that cannot be reversed. Responsibility to offer read-ing and understanding of these pages of timeless history now lies with us. The purpose of the law on the secret police files is the impartial and objec-tive pursuit of the genuine historical truth. Should we shake off the prejudices as the law and public expectations require, or, engage in useless argu-ments to re-open wounds of the past?! Pandora’s Box is now open. Let us walk the way to our own Golgotha to find the peace and reconciliation long sought for.

GGGMMM

m

nato ricteav

Exsure of the files

11


Åêàòåðèíà Áîí÷åâà,÷ëåí

„Âñè÷êè ñìå êîïåëåòàíà êîìóíèçìà“

Àäàì Ìèõíèê

Êîãàòî ïðåç 2007 ãîäèíà âñåêè òðÿáâàøå äà ñå ïðåä-

ñòàâè ñ íÿêîëêî äóìè, çà ñåáå ñè èçáðàõ òàçè ìèñúë íà Àäàì Ìèõíèê. Ãîäèíè ïî-êúñíî íå ñàìî ÿ ïîòâúðæäàâàì, íî áèõ äîáàâèëà è íåùî îò Åâàíãåëèåòî: „Òàéíîòî âèíàãè ñòàâà ÿâíî. È íå ìîæåø äà èçáÿãàø îò òîâà“.Çíàíèåòî îò àðõèâèòå íà ÄÑ ïîòâúðäè çíà-íèåòî ìè çà åäèí ðåïðåñèâåí êîìóíèñòè÷åñêè ðåæèì. Ïðè êîéòî äîðè è ïàëà÷èòå ïîíÿêîãà ñà áèëè æåðòâè.ÑÀÌÎ ÈÑÒÈÍÀÒÀ ÍÈ ÏÐÀÂÈ ÑÂÎÁÎÄÍÈ.

Îðõàí Èñìàèëîâ,÷ëåí

Â íà÷àëîòî íà ïúðâèÿ ìàí-äàò íà Êîìèñèÿòà â

êà÷åñòâîòî ìè íà çàìåñò-íèê-ïðåäñåäàòåë çàÿâèõ, ÷å îòâàðÿíåòî íà äîñèåòàòà å âàæíà ïðåäïîñòàâêà çà êà-òàðçèñà, çà ìîðàëíîòî ïðå-÷èñòâàíå íà îáùåñòâîòî. Ïðîäúëæàâàì äà áúäà íà ìíå-íèå, ÷å áåç òîçè ïðîöåñ âèíà-ãè ùåøå äà íè ãëîæäè ÷åðâå-ÿò íà ïîäîçðåíèåòî Êîé Êîé å â áúëãàðñêîòî ïîëèòè÷åñêî, èêîíîìè÷åñêî è äóõîâíî ïðîñòðàíñòâî. Ïúòÿò, êîéòî èçìèíà Êîìèñèÿòà, íå áå ëåê,

Ekaterina Boncheva,Member of the Committee

‘We all are bastards of the Com-munist system’Adam Michnik

When, in 2007, we were asked to each give a short introduction

of ourselves, I chose to quote Adam Michnik. Years later, I would use the same words again, and I would further remind what is best said in

the book of the Gospel, ‘For whatever is hidden is meant to be disclosed, and whatever is concealed is meant to be brought out into the open’.What I learned from the archives of the State Se-curity deepened my knowledge and understand-ing about a repressive communist regime where even executioners were sometimes victims.ONLY THE TRUTH CAN MAKE US FREE.

Orhan Ismailov,Member of the Committee

In the beginning of my first man-date as a Deputy Chairperson

of the Committee, I emphasised the importance of disclosing the files as a process of catharsis and moral purification of society. I retain the belief that doubts and uncertainty will otherwise con-tinue to plague the mind of our nation in the realms of political, economic and spiritual life.

The Committee was often a target of criticism. It was a long, tough road to travel to reach our goals, but it was a road worth taking.

à è íåùî îò

EEEkMMM

of Mthfu

the book of the G

èêîíîìè÷åñêî

OOOMMM

nd

of thfileanI runtinnaec

The Committee wa

12


ìèñèÿòà º ÷åñòî áå êðèòèêóâàíà, íî çàäà÷è-òå, êîèòî ñè ïîñòàâè, áÿõà èçïúëíåíè.Â òîçè äóõ, è ïðåç âòîðèÿ ìàíäàò íàøàòà èíñòèòóöèÿ ùå ñëåäâà ïúòÿ íà ðåøèìîñ-òòà, îòãîâîðíîñòòà è öåëåíàñî÷åíîñòòà. Çàùîòî îñâåòëÿâàíåòî íà ìèíàëîòî è ïðå-îäîëÿâàíåòî íà ñúìíåíèÿòà ùå ïîìîãíå íà âñè÷êè íàñ äà èçãðàäèì åäíî ïî-äîáðî áúäå-ùå. Ïîçíàâàéêè îïèòà íà èñòîðèÿòà ñè, îáå-äèíåí áúëãàðñêèÿò íàðîä ùå ìîæå äà îöåíè èñòèíñêè ñìèñúëà íà ñâîáîäàòà è äåìîêðà-öèÿòà.

In this spirit, our second mandate will continue to build on the principles of perseverance, re-sponsibility and singleness of purpose. Disman-tling the past and conquering uncertainty will pave the way for a better future. In the knowl-edge of the past, historically comprehended, lies our key to experiencing the true meaning of freedom and democracy as a people and as a nation.

Êîìèñèÿòà çàñåäàâàCommittee’s session

Êîìèñèÿòà çàñåäàâà

13

Çàêîíúò ïîâåëÿâà The law

I. What is the exclusive jurisdiction of the Committee?

A law is made up of a strict set of mandatory provisions forming articles, paragraphs and

sub-paragraphs. A functional law requires more than the good will of the people who are under the obligation to implement it. It has to demonstrate its value in practical terms; it has to be a law that works. And this law does.

The Committee for Disclosing the Documents and Announcing Affiliation of Bulgarian Citizens to the State Security and the Intelligence Services of the Bulgarian National Army (CDDAABCSSISBNA) is the only body in charge of the implementa-tion of the law which is authorised to establish and announce the affiliation of Bulgarian citizens to the State Security bodies and the intelligence services of the Bulgarian National Army. Affiliation is announced through a resolution published by the Committee on its website and in its bulletin is-sued on the grounds of article 14 of the law.

All actions dealing with disclosing, using and preserving the documents of the institutions re-ferred to above, and making them available to the public as required by law, fall within the exclusive competence of the Committee. These powers strictly apply to documents of the State Security bodies and the intelligence services of the Bulgarian National Army during the period be-tween 9 September 1944 and 16 July 1991.No other institution or individual person has the right to publicly announce affiliation or disclose any information of this nature. Violators of this rule are subject to the penalties provided for in article 273 of the Criminal Code. The research and publishing work is conducted in compliance with the Access to Public Information Act. Such activity does not confer a right to make public any information con-cerning the affiliation of an individual to the former security services, or reveal personal data of a third party mentioned in their documents.

I. Êàêâà å èçêëþ÷èòåëíàòàêîìïåòåíòíîñò íà Êîìèñèÿòà?

Âñåêè çàêîí ñëåäâà ñòðîãî ðåãëàìåíòèðàíè ÷ëåíîâå, àëèíåè è òî÷êè, ÷èåòî ïðèëîæåíèå

å çàäúëæèòåëíî. Çà äà ðàáîòè åäèí çàêîí, å íåîáõîäèìà íå ñàìî âîëÿ îò ñòðàíà íà ëèöàòà, çàäúëæåíè äà ãî ïðèëàãàò, íî è ñàìèÿò çàêîí äà áúäå äåéñòâàù. Êà÷åñòâî, êîåòî ñå äîêàçà ñ ïðàêòèêàòà ïî èçïúëíåíèåòî ìó.Êîìèñèÿòà çà ðàçêðèâàíå íà äîêóìåíòèòå è çà îáÿâÿâàíå íà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò íà áúëãàðñêè ãðàæäàíè êúì Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíà-âàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà Áúëãàðñêàòà íàðîäíà àð-ìèÿ å åäèíñòâåíèÿò îðãàí, êîéòî å íàòîâàðåí ñ èçïúëíåíèåòî íà çàêîíà è å îâëàñòåí äà óñòà-íîâÿâà è îáÿâÿâà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò íà áúëãàðñêè ãðàæäàíè êúì îðãàíèòå íà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà Áúëãàðñêàòà íà-ðîäíà àðìèÿ. Ïðèíàäëåæíîñò ñå óñòàíîâÿâà ñ ðåøåíèå íà Êîìèñèÿòà, êîåòî ñå ïóáëèêóâà â èíòåðíåò ñòðàíèöàòà º è â áþëåòèíà, êîéòî òÿ èçäàâà âúç îñíîâà íà ÷ë. 14 îò çàêîíà. Îò èçêëþ÷èòåëíàòà êîìïåòåíòíîñò íà Êîìèñè-ÿòà ñà è äåéñòâèÿòà ïî ðàçêðèâàíå, èçïîëçâàíå è ñúõðàíÿâàíå íà äîêóìåíòèòå íà òåçè îðãàíè, êàêòî è ïðåäîñòàâÿíåòî íà äîñòúï äî òÿõ. Òåçè ïðàâà ñå îòíàñÿò äî äîêóìåíòè ñàìî íà îðãàíè-òå íà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà Áúëãàðñêàòà íàðîäíà àðìèÿ çà ïå-ðèîäà 9 ñåïòåìâðè 1944 ã. – 16 þëè 1991 ã.Íèêîé äðóã îðãàí èëè ëèöå íÿìà ïðàâî äà îáÿ-âÿâà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò, íèòî äà ðàçãëàñÿâà èí-ôîðìàöèÿ, óñòàíîâÿâàùà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò. Êîé-òî ñòîðè òîâà, íîñè íàêàçàòåëíà îòãîâîðíîñò ïî ÷ë. 273 îò ÍÊ. Íàó÷íîèçñëåäîâàòåëñêàòà, ïóáëèöèñòè÷íàòà è ïðîó÷âàòåëíàòà äåéíîñò ñå èçâúðøâàò ïî ðåäà íà Çàêîíà çà äîñòúï äî îá-ùåñòâåíà èíôîðìàöèÿ. Òàçè äåéíîñò íå äàâà ïðàâî äà áúäå ðàçãëàñÿâàíà èíôîðìàöèÿ, óñ-òàíîâÿâàùà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò íà îïðåäåëåíî ëèöå êúì áèâøèòå ñëóæáè çà ñèãóðíîñò, íèòî äà ðàçãëàñÿâà ëè÷íèòå äàííè íà òðåòî ëèöå, ÷è-åòî èìå å ñïîìåíàòî â äîêóìåíòèòå èì.

14

Çàêîíúò ïîâåëÿâàThe law

II. What are the powers of theCommittee?

1. Determining and announcing Bulgarian citizens’ affiliation to the bodies of the former State Security and the intelligence services of the Bulgarian National ArmyIt was the aim of the legislator to further public awareness and establish transparency regarding holders of public positions or public functions, such as for example: the president and vice-president of the Republic; National Assembly and European Parliament members; the Prime Minister, deputy prime ministers, ministers and deputy ministers; members of the Constitutional Court; the ombuds-man and his/her deputies; representatives of dif-ferent state agencies, commissions, local authori-ties, heads and members of representative bodies of religious communities, media owners and edi-tors-in-chief, rectors of institutions of higher edu-cation, heads of supervision and monitoring bod-ies, and many more.

The law provides for the possibility of non-dis-closure and non-release of documents, the dis-closure or public announcement of which would harm the interests of the Republic of Bulgaria in the field of international relations, or endan-ger the personal life and safety of individuals. Such documents are to be filed in a separate fund of the centralised archives, which is under the direct control of the Chairperson of the Com-mittee. The latest amendment to the law (De-cember 2012) removed the restrictive §12 of the Transitional and Closing Provisions prohibiting determination of affiliation for persons who oc-cupied high positions at the Military Information Office and the National Intelligence Service after 16 July 1991. The scope of public figures subject to examination was extended altogether.

2. Acquisitions, use and preservation of the documents in the Centralised archives of the documents of the State Security and the intelligence services of the Bulgarian National Army.

II. Êàêâè ñà ïðàâîìîùèÿòàíà Êîìèñèÿòà?

1. Óñòàíîâÿâàíå è îáÿâÿâàíå íà ïðèíàäëåæ-íîñò íà áúëãàðñêè ãðàæäàíè êúì îðãàíèòå íà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà ÁÍÀÇàêîíîäàòåëÿò å íàïðàâèë òîâà ñ öåë äà äîïðè-íåñå çà äîïúëíèòåëíàòà èíôîðìèðàíîñò íà îá-ùåñòâîòî è äà âíåñå ïðîçðà÷íîñò çà ëèöàòà, êî-èòî çàåìàò ïóáëè÷íà äëúæíîñò èëè èçâúðøâàò ïóáëè÷íà äåéíîñò. Íàïðèìåð òàêèâà ëèöà ñà: ïðåçèäåíòúò è âèöåïðåçèäåíòúò íà Ðåïóáëèêàòà; íàðîäíèòå ïðåäñòàâèòåëè â Íàðîäíîòî ñúáðàíèå è â Åâðîïåéñêèÿ ïàðëàìåíò; ìèíèñòúð-ïðåäñå-äàòåëÿò, çàìåñòíèê ìèíèñòúð-ïðåäñåäàòåëèòå, ìèíèñòðèòå è çàìåñòíèê-ìèíèñòðèòå; ÷ëåíîâåòå íà Êîíñòèòóöèîííèÿ ñúä; îìáóäñìàíúò è çàìåñò-íèöèòå ìó; ïðåäñòàâèòåëè íà ðàçëè÷íè äúðæàâíè àãåíöèè, êîìèñèè, íà ìåñòíàòà âëàñò, ðúêîâîäè-òåëèòå è ÷ëåíîâåòå íà óïðàâèòåëíèòå îðãàíè íà ðåëèãèîçíè îáùíîñòè, ñîáñòâåíèöèòå è ãëàâíèòå ðåäàêòîðè íà ìåäèè, ðåêòîðèòå íà âèñøèòå ó÷åá-íè çàâåäåíèÿ, ðúêîâîäèòåëèòå íà êîíòðîëíè è íàäçîðíè îðãàíè è îùå ìíîãî äðóãè.Â çàêîíà ñå ïðåäâèæäà âúçìîæíîñòòà Êîìèñèÿòà äà íå ðàçêðèâà è äà íå îïîâåñòÿâà ïóáëè÷íî ñàìî îíåçè äîêóìåíòè, ÷èåòî ðàçêðèâàíå èëè ïóáëè÷-íî îïîâåñòÿâàíå áè óâðåäèëî èíòåðåñèòå íà Ðå-ïóáëèêà Áúëãàðèÿ â ìåæäóíàðîäíèòå îòíîøåíèÿ èëè áè ñúçäàëî ñåðèîçíà îïàñíîñò çà æèâîòà íà äàäåíî ëèöå. Ñúùèòå ñå ðåãèñòðèðàò â îòäåëåí àðõèâåí ôîíä â öåíòðàëèçèðàíèÿ àðõèâ, êîéòî å íà ïðÿêî ðàçïîðåæäàíå íà ïðåäñåäàòåëÿ íà Êî-ìèñèÿòà. Ñ ïîñëåäíàòà ïîïðàâêà íà çàêîíà (äå-êåìâðè 2012 ã.) îòïàäíà îãðàíè÷èòåëíèÿò § 12 îò Ïðåõîäíèòå è Çàêëþ÷èòåëíèòå ðàçïîðåäáè è ïî òîçè íà÷èí áå ñâàëåíà çàáðàíàòà äà íå ñå óñòà-íîâÿâà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò íà ëèöàòà, çàåìàëè ðúêî-âîäíè äëúæíîñòè ñëåä 16 þëè 1991 ã. â Ñëóæáà „Âîåííà èíôîðìàöèÿ“ è â Íàöèîíàëíàòà ðàçóçíà-âàòåëíà ñëóæáà. Êàòî öÿëî áå ðàçøèðåí îáõâàòúò íà ïðîâåðÿâàíèòå ïóáëè÷íè ëèöà. 2. Ïðèåìàíå, èçïîëçâàíå è ñúõðàíÿâàíå íà äîêóìåíòèòå â Öåíòðàëèçèðàíèÿ àðõèâ íà äîêóìåíòèòå íà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è íà ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà ÁÍÀ.

15


Until the transfer of the documents of the former security services is fully completed (set to hap-pen before the end of the second mandate of the Committee) action will be taken in accordance with article 16, paragraph 2 of the applicable law. The bodies mentioned in article 1 thereof are ex-pected to deliver written reports compiled in ac-cordance with the formal requirements of the law, as well as all documents concerning examined persons that the Committee may request. The reports are merely supplementary material, as it is entirely within the competence of the Commit-tee to determine whether or not there is evidence of affiliation to the State Security bodies and the intelligence services of the Bulgarian National Army. The hand-over of documents is defined as a physical transfer of those documents to the Committee. Upon receipt, all items must be filed in its centralised archives established for this very purpose pursuant to article 1, paragraph 3 of the law. The organisation and maintenance thereof is a responsibility of the Committee.

III. Which people are subjectto examination?

The following individuals are subject to mandatory examination for affiliation:1. persons registered at the election

commissions to run in presidential and vice-presidential elections, National Assembly and European Parliament elections, mayor and municipal councillors elections. The election commissions are required to submit the lists of candidates to the Committee within 24 hours after registration. The Committee will then com-plete and publicly disclose the outcome of the examinations, regardless of whether or not the candidates have withdrawn their nominations;

2. former or current holders of public positions and persons who have performed public ser-vice from 10 November 1989 until examination took place;

Äî îêîí÷àòåëíîòî ïðèåìàíå íà àðõèâíèòå äîêóìåíòè îò áèâøèòå ñëóæáè çà ñèãóðíîñò, êîåòî ùå áúäå èçâúðøåíî ïî âðåìå íà âòî-ðèÿ ìàíäàò íà Êîìèñèÿòà, ñå ïðîöåäèðà ïî ðåäà íà ÷ë. 16, àë. 2 îò çàêîíà. Ïî èñêàíå íà Êîìèñèÿòà, îðãàíèòå ïî ÷ë. 1 îò çàêîíà ïðåäîñòàâÿò âñè÷êèòå äîêóìåíòè, îòíàñÿùè ñå äî ïðîâåðÿâàíèòå ëèöà, è ïîäãîòâÿò ïèñ-ìåíè äîêëàäè ñ ïðåäâèäåíîòî â çàêîíîâèÿ òåêñò ñúäúðæàíèå. Äîêëàäèòå èìàò ñàìî ïîìîùåí õàðàêòåð, òúé êàòî ðåøåíèåòî ïî ñúùåñòâî îòíîñíî òîâà èìà ëè îïðåäåëåíî ëèöå ïðèíàäëåæíîñò êúì îðãàíèòå íà Äúð-æàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæ-áè íà Áúëãàðñêàòà íàðîäíà àðìèÿ å ïðåäîñ-òàâåíî åäèíñòâåíî â êîìïåòåíòíîñòòà íà ÷ëåíîâåòå íà Êîìèñèÿòà. „Ïðåäîñòàâÿíåòî“ íà äîêóìåíòèòå ïðåäñòàâëÿâà ôàêòè÷åñêî ïðåäàâàíå, ñëåä êîåòî Êîìèñèÿòà çàâåæäà ñúùèòå â öåíòðàëèçèðàí àðõèâ, ñïåöèàëíî ñúçäàäåí çà öåëòà â èçïúëíåíèå íà ÷ë. 1, àë. 3 îò çàêîíà. Íåãîâàòà îðãàíèçàöèÿ è ïîääúðæàíå å ïðàâîìîùèå íà Êîìèñèÿòà.

III. Êîè ëèöà ïîäëåæàòíà ïðîâåðêà?

Óñòàíîâÿâàíåòî íà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò å çà-äúëæèòåëíî çà:1. Ëèöà, ðåãèñòðèðàíè îò èçáèðàòåëíèòå êî-

ìèñèè çà ó÷àñòèå â èçáîðè çà ïðåçèäåíò è âèöåïðåçèäåíò, íàðîäíè ïðåäñòàâèòåëè â Íàðîäíîòî ñúáðàíèå è â Åâðîïåéñêèÿ ïàðëà-ìåíò, êìåòîâå è îáùèíñêè ñúâåòíèöè. Â ñðîê îò 24 ÷àñà ñëåä ïðèêëþ÷âàíå íà ðåãèñòðàöè-ÿòà íà êàíäèäàòèòå èçáèðàòåëíèòå êîìèñèè ïðåäîñòàâÿò ñïèñúöè ñ òåõíèòå èìåíà íà Êîìèñèÿòà, êîÿòî ïðàâè ïðîâåðêà è îáÿâÿâà ðåçóëòàòèòå çà âñåêè êàíäèäàò, íåçàâèñèìî äàëè òîé å îòòåãëèë ñâîÿòà êàíäèäàòóðà ñëåä ðåãèñòðàöèÿòà ñè çà ó÷àñòèå â èçáîðèòå.

2. Ëèöà, çàåìàëè èëè çàåìàùè ïóáëè÷íè äëúæ-íîñòè, êàêòî è èçâúðøâàëè èëè èçâúðøâàùè ïóáëè÷íè äåéíîñòè îò 10 íîåìâðè 1989 ã. äî èçâúðøâàíåòî íà ïðîâåðêàòà.

16

3. newly appointed or elected officials in public positions or public functions, in the case of per-sonnel changes;

4. people who were listed as debtors or were members of a management or supervisory body of an undertaking included in the list of debtors published in the bulletin under article 3, paragraph 2 of the Act on Information regarding Non-Performing Loans.

IV. How will preliminary examination take place?

The procedure described as preliminary ex-amination is regulated by article 27 of the law. A political party may, for example, request prelimi-nary examination for affiliation to the bodies re-ferred to in article 1 of the law in relation to those of their members who intend to run in elections or hold positions in the executive branch. Should affiliation be established, their nominations may be withdrawn, if so demanded by the organisation concerned. Preliminary examination shall be car-ried out upon written requests by:– political parties, coalitions and organisations

with respect to their members;– bodies from the legislative, executive and judicial

branch with respect to the people to be elected or appointed to public positions;

– professional, public, religious and scientific bod-ies, trade unions and other civil society organi-sations and associations with respect to their members.

The request should bear the signature of the person representing the body or organisation. A preliminary examination is not allowed without the prior written consent of the examined person which must accompany the request. It is often the case that parties or organisations file applications for examination of non-members of the requesting body. Such requests violate the requirements of the law and are therefore not to be granted. The outcome of the preliminary examination is brought to the knowledge of the applicant, and, if affiliation is determined, communicated to the examined person as well.

3. Íîâîíàçíà÷åíè èëè íîâîèçáðàíè ëèöà íà ïóáëè÷íà äëúæíîñò èëè çà èçâúðøâàíå íà ïóáëè÷íà äåéíîñò – ïðè êàäðîâè ïðîìåíè.

4. Ëèöà, êîèòî ñà ïîñî÷åíè êàòî äëúæíèöè èëè ñà áèëè ÷ëåíîâå íà óïðàâèòåëåí èëè êîíòðîëåí îðãàí íà ïðåäïðèÿòèå, ïîñî÷åíî êàòî äëúæíèê â áþëåòèíà ïî ÷ë. 3, àë. 2 îò Çàêîíà çà èíôîðìàöèÿ îòíîñíî íåîáñëóæâà-íè êðåäèòè.

IV. Êàê ñå èçâúðøâàïðåäâàðèòåëíàòà ïðîâåðêà?

Çàêîíîäàòåëÿò å ïðåäîñòàâèë è âúçìîæíîñòòà îò òàêà íàðå÷åíàòà ïðåäâàðèòåëíà ïðîâåðêà (ðåãëàìåíòèðàíà â ÷ë. 27 îò çàêîíà). Íàïðèìåð, àêî äàäåíà ïîëèòè÷åñêà ïàðòèÿ ïîèñêà ïðåäâà-ðèòåëíà ïðîâåðêà çà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò êúì îðãà-íèòå ïî ÷ë. 1 îò çàêîíà íà ëèöàòà, êîèòî âúçíà-ìåðÿâàò äà ñå êàíäèäàòèðàò â äàäåíè èçáîðè èëè çà ó÷àñòèå â èçïúëíèòåëíàòà âëàñò è àêî ñå óñòàíîâè òàêàâà, òå ìîãàò äà ñå îòêàæàò, àêî ñúîòâåòíàòà îðãàíèçàöèÿ äúðæè íà òîâà óñëî-âèå. Ïðåäâàðèòåëíàòà ïðîâåðêà ñå ïðèëàãà ïî ïèñìåíî èñêàíå íà:– ïîëèòè÷åñêè ïàðòèè, êîàëèöèè è îðãàíèçàöèè

ïî îòíîøåíèå íà òåõíèòå ÷ëåíîâå;– îðãàíè íà çàêîíîäàòåëíàòà, èçïúëíèòåëíàòà

è ñúäåáíàòà âëàñò ïî îòíîøåíèå íà ëèöà, çà êîèòî ïðåäñòîè èçáîð èëè íàçíà÷àâàíå íà ïóáëè÷íà äëúæíîñò;

– ïðîôåñèîíàëíè, ñèíäèêàëíè, îáùåñòâåíè, ðåëèãèîçíè, íàó÷íè è äðóãè ãðàæäàíñêè îð-ãàíèçàöèè è ñäðóæåíèÿ ïî îòíîøåíèå íà òåõ-íèòå ÷ëåíîâå.

Èñêàíåòî ñå ïîäïèñâà îò ëèöåòî, ïðåäñòàâëÿ-âàùî îðãàíà èëè îðãàíèçàöèÿòà. Ïðåäâàðèòåë-íàòà ïðîâåðêà å íåäîïóñòèìà, àêî ïðîâåðÿâà-íîòî ëèöå íå å äàëî ïèñìåíîòî ñè ñúãëàñèå çà íåÿ, êîåòî ñúãëàñèå ñå ïðèëàãà êúì èñêàíåòî. Â ïðàêòèêàòà ÷åñòî ñå èñêà ïðîâåðêà ïî òîçè ðåä çà ëèöà, êîèòî íå ñà ÷ëåíîâå íà ïàðòèÿòà èëè îðãàíèçàöèÿòà, êîåòî ñúùî å íåäîïóñòè-ìî. Ðåçóëòàòúò îò ïðåäâàðèòåëíàòà ïðîâåðêà ñå ïðåäîñòàâÿ íà çàÿâèòåëÿ, à ïðè óñòàíîâåíà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò – è íà ïðîâåðÿâàíîòî ëèöå.


17

V. How will affiliation bedetermined?

The Committee determines affiliation on the basis of documents that are found in the archives and collections of the former State Security services. Article 25 of the law makes reference to the per-sons and the relevant types of documents which serve as grounds for determining affiliation:– regular staff – data from the personal staff file,

regular work schedules or pay-roll forms;– part-time employees – data from the personal

staff file, regular work schedules or documents certifying receipt of payments;

– secret collaborators - declaration for collaboration, handwritten or signed by the person; handwritten information and intel-ligence provided by the person; documents certifying receipt of payments; documents handwritten or signed by the person and men-tioned in operative reports; documents com-posed by supervising staff members or part-time employees attached to them; as well as information found in the reference database (registration diaries and file indexes), proto-cols for destruction of records or other pieces of information in relation to collaborators.

The mere mention of a person’s names and aliases in the file index or registration diaries of these institutions provides enough grounds for announcement. The Committee is required, how-ever, to make a reference in its resolution to the absence of any other information mentioned in article 25, sub-paragraph 3. This legal solution rules out any argument as to whether affiliation should be announced in the absence of a hand-written and personally signed declaration for collaboration, handwritten intelligence reports, etc. If a person has a registration file in his/her name, it is the obligation of the Committee to an-nounce affiliation under the terms and conditions of article 29, paragraph 3. Affiliation must be announced if so much as a single document re-ferred to in article 25, sub-paragraph 3 exists, re-gardless of whether or not it was produced by the examined person. Such a legislative approach

V. Ïî êàêâî ñå óñòàíîâÿâàïðèíàäëåæíîñò?

Êîìèñèÿòà óñòàíîâÿâà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò âúç îñ-íîâà íà äîêóìåíòè, ñúäúðæàùè ñå â èíôîðìà-öèîííèòå ôîíäîâå íà áèâøèòå ñëóæáè íà ÄÑ. Äîêóìåíòèòå, êîèòî ñëóæàò êàòî îñíîâàíèå çà óñòàíîâÿâàíå íà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò, ñà îïðåäåëå-íè â ÷ë. 25 îò çàêîíà:– çà ùàòåí ñëóæèòåë – ñ äàííè îò íåãîâîòî ëè÷-

íî êàäðîâî äåëî, ùàòíèòå ðàçïèñàíèÿ èëè âå-äîìîñòèòå çà ïîëó÷àâàíè âúçíàãðàæäåíèÿ;

– çà íåùàòåí ñëóæèòåë – ñ äàííè îò íåãîâîòî ëè÷íî êàäðîâî äåëî, ùàòíèòå ðàçïèñàíèÿ èëè âåäîìîñòèòå çà ïîëó÷àâàíè âúçíàãðàæ-äåíèÿ;

– çà ñåêðåòåí ñúòðóäíèê – ñúñ ñîáñòâåíîðú÷-íî íàïèñàíà èëè ïîäïèñàíà äåêëàðàöèÿ çà ñúòðóäíè÷åñòâî; ñîáñòâåíîðú÷íî íàïèñàíè àãåíòóðíè ñâåäåíèÿ; äîêóìåíòè çà ïîëó÷åíè âúçíàãðàæäåíèÿ, äîêóìåíòè, ñîáñòâåíîðú÷-íî íàïèñàíè èëè ïîäïèñàíè îò ñúòðóäíèêà, ñúäúðæàùè ñå â äåëàòà íà îïåðàòèâíèÿ îò-÷åò; äîêóìåíòè îò ðúêîâîäèëèÿ ãî ùàòåí èëè íåùàòåí ñëóæèòåë, êàêòî è íàëè÷èå íà äàííè çà ëèöåòî â ñïðàâî÷íèòå ìàñèâè (ðåãèñòðàöè-îííè äíåâíèöè è êàðòîòåêè), ïðîòîêîëèòå çà óíèùîæàâàíå èëè äðóãè èíôîðìàöèîííè íî-ñèòåëè.

Äîðè ñàìî èìåíàòà íà åäíî ëèöå è ïñåâäîíèìè-òå ìó äà ñà âêëþ÷åíè â ñïðàâî÷íèòå êàðòîòåêè èëè ðåãèñòðàöèîííèòå äíåâíèöè íà ñúîòâåòíè-òå ñëóæáè, òî ñå ðàçêðèâà îò Êîìèñèÿòà, êàòî ñúùàòà å äëúæíà äà îòáåëåæè â ðåøåíèåòî ñè, ÷å ëèïñâàò äðóãè äàííè ïî ÷ë. 25, ò. 3. Òîâà çàêî-íîâî ðàçðåøåíèå èçêëþ÷âà ñïîðîâåòå îòíîñíî òîâà äàëè ñëåäâà äà ñå îïîâåñòÿâà ïðèíàä-ëåæíîñò íà ëèöå, çà êîåòî ëèïñâà ñàìîðú÷íî íàïèñàíà è ïîäïèñàíà äåêëàðàöèÿ çà ñúòðóä-íè÷åñòâî, ñàìîðú÷íî íàïèñàíè àãåíòóðíè ñâå-äåíèÿ è ïð. Äîðè äà å íàëèöå ñàìî ðåãèñòðàöèÿ íà ëèöåòî, òî ùå áúäå îáÿâåíî ïðè óñëîâèÿòà íà ÷ë. 29, àë. 3. Íàëèöå ëè å äîðè ñàìî åäèí äî-êóìåíò ïî ÷ë. 25, ò. 3, íåçàâèñèìî ñúçäàäåí ëè å îò ïðîâåðÿâàíîòî ëèöå, Êîìèñèÿòà å äëúæíà äà îáÿâè íåãîâàòà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò. Òîçè ïîäõîä


18

was adopted in view of the fact that a large vol-ume of files had been destroyed (what is left of these files are registration documents and a handful of other pieces of information). Anything other than this would work to the interests of the people who ordered the destruction of those re-cords.Having determined and announced the affiliation of public figures or holders of public functions to the former structures of the state security and the intelligence services of the Bulgarian National Army, the Committee has to publish a resolution on its website and in its official bulletin released in compliance with the law.

VI. What type of information shall not be published?

1. Information about deceased individuals shall not be published.

2. Information about persons who have reported or have consented in writing to report to the state security services before reaching the le-gal age of 18 years shall not be published.

3. Persons who had been subject to preliminary examination under the provisions of article 27 may avoid the announcement of their affiliation to the State Security. They can do so by with-drawing their nominations for public office or public service within three days upon receipt of a written notification of the outcome of the examination. This option does not apply to people who were registered at election com-mittees to run in elections. Information on their affiliation will be made public regardless of whether withdrawal takes place or not.

4. Persons who were born after 16 July 1973 shall not be subject to examination.

VII. What are the rights of citizens?

Everyone is entitled to:1. access to information collected about them or

their deceased spouse or relatives up to and including the second degree in a direct line of descent;

2. access to the documents of the bodies re-

íà çàêîíîäàòåëÿ å ïðèåò ïîðàäè óíèùîæàâà-íåòî íà îãðîìåí áðîé àðõèâíè äåëà îò áèâøè-òå ñëóæáè, ïðè êîåòî ñà çàïàçåíè ñàìî ÷àñò îò äîêóìåíòèòå èëè ñàìî ðåãèñòðàöèîííèòå äîêó-ìåíòè çà ëèöåòî. Äðóã ïîäõîä áè îáñëóæâàë öå-ëèòå íà ëèöàòà, íàðåäèëè óíèùîæàâàíåòî. Ñëåä êàòî óñòàíîâè è îáÿâè òàêàâà ïðèíàäëåæ-íîñò çà äîêàçâàíå ñúïðè÷àñòíîñò íà ïóáëè÷-íè ëè÷íîñòè èëè ëèöà, èçâúðøâàùè ïóáëè÷íè äåéíîñòè êúì áèâøèòå ñòðóêòóðè íà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà ÁÍÀ, Êîìèñèÿòà èçëèçà ñ ðåøåíèå, êîåòî ñå ïóá-ëèêóâà íà èíòåðíåò ñòðàíèöàòà è â áþëåòèíà, êîéòî òÿ èçäàâà ïî çàêîí.

VI. Êîè äàííè íå ñå ïóáëèêóâàò?

1. Íå ïîäëåæàò íà ïóáëèêóâàíå äàííèòå çà ïî-÷èíàëî ëèöå.

2. Íå ïîäëåæàò íà ïóáëèêóâàíå äàííè çà ëèöå, êîåòî å èçðàçèëî ïèñìåíî ãîòîâíîñò äà äàâà èëè å äàâàëî èíôîðìàöèÿ äî íàâúðøâàíå íà 18-ãîäèøíà âúçðàñò.

3. Ëèöå, êîåòî å áèëî îáåêò íà ïðåäâàðèòåë-íà ïðîâåðêà ïî ðåäà íà ÷ë. 27, ìîæå äà èç-áåãíå ïóáëèêóâàíåòî íà äàííèòå çà íåãîâàòà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò êúì ÄÑ, àêî â òðèäíåâåí ñðîê îò ïèñìåíîòî ìó óâåäîìÿâàíå çà ðåçóëòàòà îò ïðîâåðêàòà îòòåãëè êàíäèäàòóðàòà ñè çà çàåìàíå íà ïóáëè÷íà äëúæíîñò èëè èçâúðø-âàíå íà ïóáëè÷íà äåéíîñò. Òàçè âúçìîæíîñò å íåïðèëîæèìà çà ëèöå, ðåãèñòðèðàíî â èç-áèðàòåëíèòå êîìèñèè çà ó÷àñòèå â èçáîðè, è ïðèíàäëåæíîñòòà ìó ñå îáÿâÿâà, íåçàâèñè-ìî îò îòòåãëÿíåòî íà êàíäèäàòóðàòà ìó.

4. Ëèöàòà, ðîäåíè ñëåä 16 þëè 1973 ã., íå ïîäëåæàò íà ïðîâåðêà.

VII. Êàêâè ñà ïðàâàòàíà ãðàæäàíèòå?

Âñåêè èìà ïðàâî:1. Íà äîñòúï äî èíôîðìàöèÿòà, ñúáèðàíà

çà íåãî èëè çà íåãîâèòå ïî÷èíàëè ñúïðóã/à èëè ðîäíèíè ïî ïðàâà ëèíèÿ äî âòîðà ñòåïåí âêëþ÷èòåëíî;

2. Íà äîñòúï äî äîêóìåíòèòå íà îðãàíèòå ïî


19

ferred to in article 1 for research and publish-ing purposes by virtue of the Access to Public Information Act.

The access to documents involves the right to personally consult the records, obtain document copies and request disclosure of the names of the persons who provided information in the case. This right is exercised by means of a written application which has to contain an explicit request for revealing the identity of those persons.Having been granted access to the resources, ap-plicants have the opportunity to personally con-sult the documents in the reading room of the Committee. If the documents contain references to third par-ties, the mention of which may seriously affect the rights and legitimate interests of the parties, and no explicit written consent for disclosure is given by those parties or their heirs, copies of documents shall not include the information regarding those third parties. In such a case, the applicant shall sign a declaration of non-disclosure of the circumstances which have come to his/her attention. In practice this means that applicants, as a rule, have the right to personally examine the original documents, but if no consent is given by the third persons mentioned in those documents, all information regarding the latter will be removed from the copies.Persons whose affiliation has been announced in a resolution of the Committee have the right to examine the documents in their personal and working files. It is their right to appeal the de-cisions of the Committee in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Code. An appeal nevertheless shall not sus-pend the publication of these decisions on the website and in the bulletin of the Committee.

VIII. What are the obligations of citi-zens and institutions?

1. Physical persons, legal entities and institutions do not have the right to publish or announce in any other way documents or parts

÷ë. 1 çà íàó÷íîèçñëåäîâàòåëñêà, ïóáëèöè-ñòè÷íà è ïðîó÷âàòåëíà äåéíîñò ïî ðåäà íà Çàêîíà çà äîñòúï äî îáùåñòâåíà èíôîðìà-öèÿ.

Äîñòúïúò âêëþ÷âà íåïîñðåäñòâåíî çàïîçíàâà-íå ñ äîêóìåíòèòå, èçäàâàíå íà êîïèÿ îò äîêó-ìåíòè, ðàçêðèâàíå ñàìîëè÷íîñòòà íà ëèöàòà, äàâàëè èíôîðìàöèÿ ïî äåëîòî. Ïðàâîòî ñå óï-ðàæíÿâà ñ ïîäàâàíå íà ïèñìåíî çàÿâëåíèå. Èñêàíåòî çà ðàçêðèâàíå ñàìîëè÷íîñòòà íà ëè-öàòà, äàâàëè èíôîðìàöèÿ ïî äåëîòî, ñëåäâà äà å èçðè÷íî ïîñî÷åíî è äà å â ïèñìåíà ôîðìà. Êîìèñèÿòà îñèãóðÿâà èñêàíèÿ äîñòúï, êàòî ïðåäîñòàâÿ íà çàÿâèòåëÿ íàìåðåíèòå äîêóìåí-òè çà íåïîñðåäñòâåíî çàïîçíàâàíå ñ òÿõ â ÷è-òàëíÿòà. Êîãàòî ñúäúðæàíèåòî íà äîêóìåíòèòå ìîæå ñúùåñòâåíî äà íàðóøè ïðàâà è çàêîííè èí-òåðåñè íà òðåòè ëèöà, ÷èèòî èìåíà ñà ñïîìå-íàòè â òÿõ, è íÿìà èçðè÷íî ïèñìåíî ñúãëàñèå îò òðåòèòå ëèöà èëè îò òåõíèòå íàñëåäíèöè, ñå ïðåäîñòàâÿò êîïèÿ, êîèòî íå âêëþ÷âàò äàííèòå, îòíàñÿùè ñå äî òðåòèòå ëèöà. Â òîçè ñëó÷àé çà-ÿâèòåëÿò ïîäïèñâà äåêëàðàöèÿ çà íåðàçãëàñÿ-âàíå íà îáñòîÿòåëñòâàòà, êîèòî ñà ìó ñòàíàëè èçâåñòíè. Íà ïðàêòèêà òîâà îçíà÷àâà, ÷å çà-ÿâèòåëÿò âèíàãè èìà ïðàâî íà íåïîñðåäñòâåíî çàïîçíàâàíå ñ äîêóìåíòèòå â îðèãèíàë, íî ïðè ïîëó÷àâàíå íà êîïèÿ ïðè ëèïñà íà ñúãëàñèå îò òðåòèòå ëèöà äàííèòå, îòíàñÿùè ñå äî òÿõ, ùå áúäàò çàëè÷åíè â êîïèÿòà.Âñÿêî ëèöå, íà êîåòî ñ ðåøåíèå íà Êîìèñèÿ-òà å îáÿâåíà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò, èìà ïðàâî äà ñå çàïîçíàå ñ äîêóìåíòèòå, ñúäúðæàùè ñå â íå-ãîâîòî ëè÷íî è ðàáîòíî äåëî. Íåãîâî ïðàâî å è äà îáæàëâà ðåøåíèåòî íà Êîìèñèÿòà ïî ðåäà íà Àäìèíèñòðàòèâíî-ïðîöåñóàëíèÿ êîäåêñ. Ïîäàâàíåòî íà æàëáà îáà÷å íå ñïèðà ïóáëè-êóâàíåòî íà ïîñòàíîâåíîòî ðåøåíèå â èíòåð-íåò ñòðàíèöàòà è â áþëåòèíà íà Êîìèñèÿòà.

VIII. Êàêâè ñà çàäúëæåíèÿòàíà ãðàæäàíèòå è èíñòèòóöèèòå?

1. Ôèçè÷åñêèòå, þðèäè÷åñêèòå ëèöà è èí-ñòèòóöèèòå íÿìàò ïðàâî äà ïóáëèêóâàò èëè ðàçãëàñÿâàò ïî äðóã íà÷èí äîêóìåíòè èëè


20

of documents that provide evidence for affiliation to the bodies referred to in article 1. Violators of this prohibition bear criminal responsibility under article 273 of the Criminal Code. There is, however, no legal requirement which pre-vents physical persons from announcing their own affiliation.

2. Physical persons, legal entities and institutions which are in possession of original documents of the bodies referred to in article 1, have the obligation to submit them to the Committee. Failure to fulfill this requirement will result in a penalty according to article 313b, paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code.

3. If officially invited, officials and citizens are obliged to appear before the Committee within seven days upon receipt of the notifica-tion and submit the requested information and documents.

4. Òhe reference aids and archival documents of the bodies referred to in article 1 can only be used upon permission of the Chairperson of the Committee.

5. It is the duty of the heads of the security services to have the undercover officials and collaborators holding public positions or public service functions removed from oversight, and notify the Committee thereof. Any failure to fulfill this obligation will lead to actions taken in accordance with article 284b of the Criminal Code.

÷àñòè îò òÿõ, êîèòî óñòàíîâÿâàò ïðèíàäëåæ-íîñò êúì îðãàíèòå ïî ÷ë. 1. Íàðóøåíèåòî íà òîâà çàäúëæåíèå å èíêðèìèíèðàíî è èçâúð-øèòåëÿò íîñè íàêàçàòåëíà îòãîâîðíîñò ïî ÷ë. 273 îò ÍÊ. Íÿìà îáà÷å çàêîíîâà çàáðàíà ôèçè÷åñêî ëèöå äà îãëàñÿâà ñîáñòâåíàòà ñè ïðèíàäëåæíîñò.

2. Ôèçè÷åñêèòå, þðèäè÷åñêèòå ëèöà è èí-ñòèòóöèèòå, êîèòî ïðèòåæàâàò îðèãèíàëíè äîêóìåíòè íà îðãàíèòå ïî ÷ë. 1, ñà äëúæíè äà ãè ïðåäîñòàâÿò íà Êîìèñèÿòà. Íåèçïúëíå-íèåòî íà òîâà çàäúëæåíèå ñå ñàíêöèîíèðà ïî íàêàçàòåëåí ðåä ñúãëàñíî ÷ë. 313 á, àë. 2 îò ÍÊ.

3. Äëúæíîñòíèòå ëèöà è ãðàæäàíèòå, êîèòî áúäàò ïîêàíåíè, ñà äëúæíè â 7-äíåâåí ñðîê îò ïîëó÷àâàíå íà ïîêàíàòà äà ñå ÿâÿò ïðåä Êîìèñèÿòà è äà ïðåäîñòàâÿò ïîèñêàíèòå îò òÿõ ñâåäåíèÿ è äîêóìåíòè.

4. Èçïîëçâàíåòî íà ñïðàâî÷íèÿ àïàðàò è àð-õèâíèòå äîêóìåíòè íà îðãàíèòå ïî ÷ë. 1 ñå èçâúðøâà ñàìî ñëåä ïðåäâàðèòåëíî ðàçðå-øåíèå íà ïðåäñåäàòåëÿ íà Êîìèñèÿòà.

5. Ðúêîâîäèòåëèòå íà ñëóæáèòå çà ñèãóðíîñò ñà äëúæíè äà ñâàëÿò îò îò÷åò ñëóæèòåëèòå ïîä ïðèêðèòèå è ñúòðóäíèöèòå, çàåìàùè ïóá-ëè÷íà äëúæíîñò èëè èçâúðøâàùè ïóáëè÷íà äåéíîñò, è äà óâåäîìÿò Êîìèñèÿòà çà òîâà. Íåèçïúëíåíèåòî íà òîâà çàäúëæåíèå ñúùî ñå ñàíêöèîíèðà ñïîðåä ÷ë. 284 á îò ÍÊ.


21

The rules of procedure of theCDDAA BCSSISBNA is the second most im-portant document after the law regulating theactivity, structure, organisation of work and number of posts in the administration of the Committee. The rules define the membership requirements and powers of the Committee. The latter is a collegial body intended to implement the national policy on disclosing, announcing and preserving the documents of the State Security and the intel-ligence services of the BNA by means of:� finding, collecting, studying, analysing, apprais-

ing and preserving documents about the oper-ation of the State Security and the intelligence services of the Bulgarian National Army;

� determining and announcing affiliation of Bul-garian citizens to the State Security and the intelligence services of the Bulgarian National Army;

� administering the centralised archives;� delivering documents certifying the affiliation of

physical persons to the State Security and the intelligence services of the Bulgarian National Army;

� granting access to the archives;� engaging in research, document publication

and exhibition, conferences, etc.� cooperating with similar domestic and foreign

institutions;� publishing an information bulletin on a regular

basis;� submitting activity reports to the National As-

sembly on a semi-annual basis.

The Committee is represented by its Chairper-son, who is also in charge of the budgeting. S/he is responsible for managing the imple-mentation of resolutions and communicat-ing activities to the public through the mass media. The Deputy Chairperson provides as-sistance to and substitutes the Chairperson in his/her absence, while the Secretary ad-ministers ongoing activities. Members of the Committee are of equal status and act on its behalf in conformity with the LADDAABCS-SISBNA. The Committee meets to deal with

Ïðàâèëíèêúò çà äåéíîñòòà íàÊÐÄÎÏÁÃÄÑÐÑÁÍÀ å âòîðèÿò ïî âàæíîñò ñëåä çàêîíà îñíîâåí íîðìàòèâåí äîêóìåíò. Òîé óðåæäà äåéíîñòòà, ñòðóêòóðàòà, îðãàíèçàöèÿòà íà ðàáîòà è ÷èñëåíîñòòà íà àäìèíèñòðàöèÿòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà. Â ïðàâèëíèêà ñà ðàçïèñàíè ñúñòàâúò è ïðàâî-ìîùèÿòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà, êîÿòî å êîëåãèàëåí îðãàí, êîéòî îñúùåñòâÿâà ïîëèòèêàòà íà Ðåïó-áëèêà Áúëãàðèÿ çà ðàçêðèâàíåòî, îáÿâÿâàíåòî è ñúõðàíÿâàíåòî íà äîêóìåíòèòå íà ÄÑ è ÐÑ íà ÁÍÀ, êàòî:� èçäèðâà, ñúáèðà, ïðîó÷âà, àíàëèçèðà, îöå-

íÿâà è ñúõðàíÿâà äîêóìåíòè, ñúäúðæàùè èíôîðìàöèÿ çà äåéíîñòòà íà Äúðæàâíà ñè-ãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà Áúë-ãàðñêàòà íàðîäíà àðìèÿ;

� óñòàíîâÿâà è îáÿâÿâà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò íà áúëãàðñêè ãðàæäàíè êúì Äúðæàâíà ñèãóð-íîñò è ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà Áúëãàð-ñêàòà íàðîäíà àðìèÿ;

� óïðàâëÿâà öåíòðàëèçèðàíèÿ àðõèâ íà äîêó-ìåíòèòå;

� èçäàâà äîêóìåíòè çà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò íà ôè-çè÷åñêè ëèöà êúì Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà Áúëãàðñêàòà íàðîäíà àðìèÿ;

� ïðåäîñòàâÿ äîñòúï äî àðõèâíèòå äîêóìåíòè;� èçâúðøâà íàó÷íîèçñëåäîâàòåëñêà äåéíîñò,

ïóáëèêóâà äîêóìåíòè, îðãàíèçèðà èçëîæáè, êîíôåðåíöèè è äð.;

� ñúòðóäíè÷è ñè ñúñ ñðîäíè ÷óæäåñòðàííè è ìåæäóíàðîäíè èíñòèòóöèè;

� èçäàâà ïåðèîäè÷åí èíôîðìàöèîíåí áþëå-òèí;

� äâà ïúòè â ãîäèíàòà ñå îò÷èòà çà äåéíîñòòà ñè ñ äîêëàäè ïðåä Íàðîäíîòî ñúáðàíèå.

Êîìèñèÿòà ñå ïðåäñòàâëÿâà îò íåéíèÿ ïðåä-ñåäàòåë, êîéòî å è ïúðâîñòåïåíåí ðàçïîðåäè-òåë íà áþäæåòà º. Ïðåäñåäàòåëÿò îðãàíèçèðà èçïúëíåíèåòî íà ðåøåíèÿòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà è èíôîðìèðà îáùåñòâåíîñòòà çà äåéíîñòòà º ÷ðåç ñðåäñòâàòà çà ìàñîâà èíôîðìàöèÿ. Çàì.-ïðåäñåäàòåëÿò íà Êîìèñèÿòà ïîäïîìàãà è çà-ìåñòâà ïðåäñåäàòåëÿ ïðè íåãîâîòî îòñúñòâèå, à ñåêðåòàðÿò îðãàíèçèðà òåêóùàòà º äåéíîñò. ×ëåíîâåòå íà Êîìèñèÿòà ñà ðàâíîïîñòàâåíè è

Íàøèòå ïðàâèëà Our rules

22

issues within its competence. Decisions are adopted by open vote.

Members of the administrative staff of the Com-mittee are subject to examination under the Clas-sified Information Protection Act and its imple-menting rules. There is general and specialised administra-tion.

îñúùåñòâÿâàò ôóíêöèèòå º ñúîáðàçíî ÇÄÐÄÎ-ÏÁÃÄÑÐÑÁÍÀ. Êîìèñèÿòà ðåøàâà âúïðîñèòå îò ñâîÿòà êîìïåòåíòíîñò íà çàñåäàíèÿ. Ðåøå-íèÿòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà ñå ïðèåìàò íà çàñåäàíèÿ ïðè ÿâíî ãëàñóâàíå. Ñëóæèòåëèòå â àäìèíèñòðàöèÿòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà ñå ïðîó÷âàò ïî ðåäà íà Çàêîíà çà çàùèòà íà êëàñèôèöèðàíà èíôîðìàöèÿ è Ïðàâèëíèêà çà ïðèëàãàíå íà Çàêîíà çà çàùèòà íà êëàñèôèöè-ðàíà èíôîðìàöèÿ. Àäìèíèñòðàöèÿòà å îáùà è ñïåöèàëèçèðàíà.

Íàøèòå ïðàâèëàOur rules

СТРУКТУРАНА КОМИСИЯ ЗА РАЗКРИВАНЕ НА ДОКУМЕНТИТЕ И ЗА ОБЯВЯВАНЕ НА ПРИНАДЛЕЖНОСТ НА БЪЛГАРСКИ ГРАЖДАНИ КЪМ

ДЪРЖАВНА СИГУРНОСТ И РАЗУЗНАВАТЕЛНИТЕ СЛУЖБИ НА БЪЛГАРСКАТА НАРОДНА АРМИЯ (КРДОПБГДСРСБНА)

Председател Заместник-председател

Вътрешен одитор

Дирекция „Архив“

Сектор„Дигитализация,реставрация и

застраховане наархива“

Сектор„Комплектуванеи съхранение на

архива“

Отдел„Комплектуване,

съхранение,дигитализация,реставрация и

застраховане наархива“

Отдел„Правно-

административен“

Отдел„Управление насобствеността“

Отдел„Финансово-счетоводен и

управление начовешките ресурси“

Отдел„Обслужванена граждани“

Отдел„Изследванеи публичностна архивите“

Отдел„Специализиран

архив икартотеки“

Дирекция „Изследване наархивите и публична дейност“

Дирекция „Финансово-стопанскии правно-административни дейности“

СПЕЦИАЛИЗИРАНА АДМИНИСТРАЦИЯ ОБЩА АДМИНИСТРАЦИЯ

Служител посигурността наинформацията

Секретар Член

Член

Член Член

Член Член

23

Íàøèòå ïðàâèëàOur rules

1. Îáùàòà àäìèíèñòðàöèÿ ó÷àñòâà â ðàçðà-áîòâàíåòî íà:

� íîðìàòèâíè àêòîâå è âúòðåøíè ïðàâèëà, ñâúðçàíè ñ äåéíîñòòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà;

� îñúùåñòâÿâà ïðîöåñóàëíîòî º ïðåäñòàâè-òåëñòâî;

� îðãàíèçèðà è îñúùåñòâÿâà äåëîâîäíàòà äåé-íîñò;

� îòãîâàðÿ çà ôèíàíñîâàòà äåéíîñò è ôèíàíñî-âèÿ êîíòðîë;

� îðãàíèçèðà äåéíîñòèòå ïî óïðàâëåíèåòî íà ÷îâåøêèòå ðåñóðñè;

� îòãîâàðÿ çà ïðàâèëíîòî ïîëçâàíå íà ñîá-ñòâåíîñòòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà.

2. Ñïåöèàëèçèðàíàòà àäìèíèñòðàöèÿ ó÷àñò-âà â äåéíîñòòà ïî:

� êîìïëåêòóâàíå, ñúõðàíåíèå, äèãèòàëèçàöèÿ, ðåñòàâðàöèÿ è çàñòðàõîâàíå íà àðõèâíèòå äîêóìåíòè;

� îðãàíèçèðàíå íà öÿëîñòíàòà äåéíîñò ïî èç-äèðâàíå, ïðîó÷âàíå, àíàëèçèðàíå, îöåíÿâà-íå è ïðåäîñòàâÿíå íà äîñòúï äî äîêóìåíòè;

� ïîäãîòâÿíå íà ïðîåêòè çà ðåøåíèÿ íà Êîìè-ñèÿòà çà óñòàíîâÿâàíå è îáÿâÿâàíå íà ïðè-íàäëåæíîñò;

� èçñëåäâàíå è èçäàâàíå íà äîêóìåíòè ñ îáðà-çîâàòåëíî-èíôîðìàöèîííà öåë;

� îñúùåñòâÿâà âðúçêèòå íà Êîìèñèÿòà ñ ÷óæ-äåñòðàííè îðãàíè è èíñòèòóöèè.

Ïðè èçïúëíåíèå íà îïåðàòèâíèòå ñè çàäà÷è ñëóæèòåëèòå îò àäìèíèñòðàöèÿòà ñå ðúêîâîäÿò îò ïðîñòðàííî ðàçïèñàíè âúòðåøíè ïðàâèëà.

1. General administration is involved in:� elaboration of regulations and internal rules

governing the work of the Committee;� procedural representation thereof;� organisation and handling of books and ac-

counts;� management and supervision of financial

operations;� coordination of the management of human

resources;� the proper use of the Committee’s property.

2. Specialised administration is involved in:� acquisition, preservation, digitalisation, res-

toration and conservation of archival docu-ments;

� coordination of the overall cycle of activities: search, study, analysis, appraisal and access granting as far as files are concerned;

� drafting of the resolutions of the Committee determining and announcing affiliation;

� research and production of documents for educational and information purposes;

� management of the contacts between the Committee and international bodies and in-stitutions.

When performing their operational duties, ad-ministrative employees act in accordance with the detailed internal rules of procedure.

24

The Committee’s structure of administration is di-vided into directorates, departments and sections. It is the objective of our dedicated staff of 103 employees, mostly young and highly motivated people, to further public knowledge on the reality of the past. This task is accomplished by means of acquiring and preserving the historical records of national secret services of the recent past, ensur-ing access thereto for researchers and the gen-eral public and engaging in awareness raising and publishing activities.

Êîìèñèÿòà å èçãðàäèëà àäìèíèñòðàöèÿ, êîÿòî å ðàçäåëåíà íà äèðåêöèè, îòäåëè è ñåêòîðè. Îáùàòà º ÷èñëåíîñò å 103-ìà äóøè. Åêèïúò å ïðåîáëàäàâàùî ìëàä è ìíîãî àìáèöèðàí. Ïðè èçïúëíåíèåòî íà çàäà÷èòå ñè ñëóæèòåëèòå êîìïëåêòóâàò è ñúõðàíÿò àðõèâíèòå äîêóìåíòè íà òàéíèòå ñëóæáè îò áëèçêîòî ìèíàëî íà Áúë-ãàðèÿ, îñèãóðÿâàò äîñòúï äî òÿõ íà ãðàæäàíè è èçñëåäîâàòåëè è ñå ñòðåìÿò âñå ïî-ïúëíî äà èíôîðìèðàò îáùåñòâîòî çà òÿõíîòî ñúäúðæà-íèå ïîñðåäñòâîì èçäàòåëñêàòà è ïóáëè÷íàòà ñè äåéíîñò.

Åêèï îò ïðîôåñèîíàëèñòè A team of professionals

Â ïðèåìíàòà íà ÊîìèñèÿòàIn the reception room

Â àðõèâîõðàíèëèùàòà íà ÊîìèñèÿòàIn the depositories

Â ïðèåìíàòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà Â àðõèâîõðàíèëèùàòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà

Â ëàáîðàòîðèÿòà çà ðåñòàâðàöèÿ è êîíñåð-

âàöèÿ íà äîêóìåíòè

In the laboratory for restoration and pres-ervation

25

The issue of opening access to the archives of the former Bulgarian secret services was

raised in the wake of the democratic changes in the country. Many informal civil society organi-sations which emerged on the national scene at the end of the 1980s identified it as their priority to dismantle the heritage of the former State Se-curity. Their main interest was to take the names of political informants, who covertly reported op-ponents of the regime, out of the secrecy folders. The first mass democratic protests of the oppo-sition at the end of 1989 and the beginning of 1990 were mainly held under the motto ‘Expose State Security informers’. The secret files of the collaborators of State Security’s Sixth Director-ate (also known as political police) were among the hotly debated topics in the then-emerging free press. The subject remained relevant dur-ing the talks at the round table (January–May 1990).

Èñòîðèÿòà îêîëî ðàçêðèâàíåòî íà äîêó-ìåíòèòå íà áèâøèòå òàéíè ñëóæáè ó íàñ

äàòèðà îò ïúðâèòå äíè íà äåìîêðàòè÷íèòå ïðîìåíè â Áúëãàðèÿ. Ìíîãî îò íåôîðìàëíèòå ãðàæäàíñêè îðãàíèçàöèè, ñúçäàäåíè â ñòðàíà-òà â êðàÿ íà 80-òå ãîäèíè íà ÕÕ âåê, ïîñòàâÿò êàòî ñâîÿ çàäà÷à îñâåòÿâàíåòî íà äåéíîñòòà íà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ïî-ñïåöèàëíî íà äî-ñèåòàòà íà õîðàòà, èíôîðìèðàëè ïîëèòè÷åñêà-òà ïîëèöèÿ çà ïîâåäåíèåòî íà íåñúãëàñíèòå ñ ðåæèìà. Ïî âðåìå íà ïúðâèòå äåìîêðàòè÷íè ìèòèíãè íà îïîçèöèÿòà â êðàÿ íà 1989-à è íà-÷àëîòî íà 1990-à ãîäèíà èñêàíåòî çà îñâåòÿ-âàíå íà „äîíîñíèöèòå“ íà ÄÑ å ñðåä îñíîâíèòå ëîçóíãè. Òåìàòà ñ äîñèåòàòà íà ñúòðóäíèöèòå íà Øåñòè îòäåë íà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò (ò.íàð. ïîëèòè÷åñêà ïîëèöèÿ) å ñðåä íàé-äèñêóòèðà-íèòå òåìè è ïî ñòðàíèöèòå íà íîâîïîÿâèëèÿ ñå ñâîáîäåí ïå÷àò. Òÿ íå ñëèçà îò äíåâíèÿ ðåä íà ïðåãîâîðèòå îêîëî Êðúãëàòà ìàñà (ÿíóàðè-ìàé 1990 ã.).

Ïðåäèñòîðèÿòà Background

26

It was at that time that the process of dissolution of the repressive organs of the State Security began. It mainly affected the institution of the political po-lice housed under the Ministry of the Interior and the military intelligence bodies of the People’s De-fence Ministry. By order of the Minister of the Inte-rior at the time, General Atanas Semerdzhiev, the damaging records kept at the ministry’s archives were largely destroyed.On 23 August 1990, under pressure from the public, the 7th Grand National Assembly estab-lished a seven-member committee presided over by Bulgarian Socialist Party MP Georgi Tambuev, tasked to investigate the archives and announce the names of State Security collaborators who were also members of the Grand National As-sembly. Tambuev Committee’s activity ceased before any results were achieved due to a series of publications in the Fax Newspaper announcing the names of 33 members of parliament, who had been collaborating with the Sixth Directorate of the SS. This was not an official document, but it raised a commotion and the process of opening the files of the former political police was brought to a deadlock.In 1992, action was taken against Reserve Gen-eral Atanas Semerdzhiev and Reserve General Nanka Serkedzhieva for destroying 144,235 files of the former State Security. On 13 December of that year, the retiring Prime Minister, Philip Dimitrov, issued Ordinance No. ÊÂ 215, which specified that members of parliament would be able to obtain a document from the Ministry of the Interior, stating whether they had collabo-rated to the former State Security. Certificates would be issued against a payment of 100 Bul-garian leva.In 1993, the 36th National Assembly, acting on pro-posal by Lyubomir Pavlov (member of the Union of the Democratic Forces and of parliament), adopt-ed Resolution No. 14, which read as follows, ‘the information on the methods, means and reports provided by SS agents for the time period until 13 October 1991, is not deemed state secret’. The resolution has never been put into effect.The Law on Access to the Documents of the For-mer State Security and the Intelligence Director-

Ïðåç òîâà âðåìå çàïî÷âà è ïðîöåñúò ïî ðàç-ãðàæäàíå íà ñèëîâèòå ñòðóêòóðè êàòî Äúð-æàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ïî ñïåöèàëíî îðãàíèòå íà ïîëèòè÷åñêàòà ïîëèöèÿ íà Ìèíèñòåðñòâîòî íà âúòðåøíèòå ðàáîòè, êàêòî è âîåííèòå ðàçóç-íàâàòåëíè îðãàíè íà Ìèíèñòåðñòâîòî íà íà-ðîäíàòà îòáðàíà. Ïî çàïîâåä íà òîãàâàøíèÿ ìèíèñòúð íà âúòðåøíèòå ðàáîòè ãåí. Àòàíàñ Ñåìåðäæèåâ çëåïîñòàâÿùàòà äîêóìåíòàöèÿ, íàìèðàùà ñå â àðõèâà íà ÌÂÐ, â ãîëÿìàòà ñè ÷àñò å óíèùîæåíà.Ïîä íàòèñêà íà îáùåñòâåíîòî ìíåíèå íà 23 àâ-ãóñò 1990 ã. Ñåäìîòî Âåëèêî íàðîäíî ñúáðà-íèå ñúçäàâà Êîìèñèÿ ñ ïðåäñåäàòåë äåïóòàòà îò ÁÑÏ Ãåîðãè Òàìáóåâ, êîÿòî ñå ñúñòîè îò 7 ÷ëåíîâå è ÷èÿòî çàäà÷à å äà ïðîó÷àò äîêóìåí-òèòå è äà îãëàñÿò èìåíàòà íà ñúòðóäíèöèòå íà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò, äåïóòàòè âúâ Âåëèêîòî íàðîäíî ñúáðàíèå. Ïðåäè îôèöèàëíîòî èì îã-ëàñÿâàíå ðàáîòàòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà „Òàìáóåâ“ å ïðåêðàòåíà, çàùîòî èíôîðìàöèÿòà âå÷å å ïî-ëó÷èëà ïóáëè÷íîñò ñëåä ñåðèÿòà îò ïóáëèêàöèè âúâ âåñòíèê „Ôàêñ“, â êîèòî ñà îñâåòåíè èìåíà-òà íà 33-ìà äåïóòàòè – ñúòðóäíèöè íà Øåñòî óïðàâëåíèå íà ÄÑ. Ñïèñúêúò íå å îôèöèàëåí äîêóìåíò, íî ïðåäèçâèêâà ñêàíäàë è áëîêèðà ïðîöåñà ïî îòâàðÿíåòî íà àðõèâèòå íà áèâøà-òà ïîëèòè÷åñêà ïîëèöèÿ.Ïðåç 1992 ãîäèíà ñðåùó î.ç. ãåí. Àòàíàñ Ñåìåð-äæèåâ è î.ç. ãåí. Íàíêà Ñåðêåäæèåâà å çàâåäåíî äåëî çà óíèùîæàâàíåòî íà 144 235 äîñèåòà îò àðõèâèòå íà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò. Íà 13 äåêåì-âðè ñúùàòà ãîäèíà ìèíèñòúð-ïðåäñåäàòåëÿò â îñ-òàâêà Ôèëèï Äèìèòðîâ èçäàâà çàïîâåä ÊÂ- 215, ñïîðåä êîÿòî âñåêè äåïóòàò ìîæå ñðåùó 100 ëâ. äà ïîëó÷è äîêóìåíò îò ÌÂÐ ñ èíôîðìàöèÿ äàëè å ñúòðóäíè÷èë íà áèâøàòà ÄÑ.Ïðåç 1993 ã. 36-îòî Íàðîäíî ñúáðàíèå, ïî ïðåä-ëîæåíèå íà äåïóòàòà îò ÑÄÑ Ëþáîìèð Ïàâëîâ, ïðèåìà Ðåøåíèå ¹14, êîåòî ãëàñè, ÷å „íå ñà äúðæàâíà òàéíà ñâåäåíèÿòà çà ìåòîäèòå, ñðåä-ñòâàòà, êàêòî è àãåíòóðíàòà èíôîðìàöèÿ íà ÄÑ çà ïåðèîäà äî 13 îêòîìâðè 1991 ãîäèíà“. Ðåøå-íèåòî íå âëèçà â èçïúëíåíèå.Ïúðâèÿò Çàêîí çà äîñòúï äî äîêóìåíòèòå íà áè-âøàòà ÄÑ è Ðàçóçíàâàòåëíîòî óïðàâëåíèå íà Ãåíåðàëíèÿ ùàá íà àðìèÿòà å ïðèåò îò 38-îòî

ÏðåäèñòîðèÿòàBackground

27


ate of the General Staff, adopted in 1997 by the 38th National Assembly, was the first of its kind. Having investigated the archives of the Ministry of the Interior, the committee, established by virtue of this law and presided over by the then Minister of the Interior General Bogomil Bonev, read the names of 23 politicians and civil servants who used to work for the former State Security before the National Assembly. Fourteen of them were members of parliament at that time. This law was not focused at lustration. However, it was not long before the powers of the Bonev Committee were hampered by force of Ruling No. 10 of the Con-stitutional Court. It was a decision which stated that, if a registration file is the only evidence left connecting a person to the former secret services (that is, if a person fell within the category of the so called indexed ones), announcement of affilia-tion would not be allowed.Four years later, in the year 2001, amendments were made to the Law on Access to the Documents of the Former State Security and the Intelligence Director-ate of the General Staff. The scope of examinations was extended to include the documents of the for-mer intelligence department of the Border Troops. Two new bodies were established in the place of the Bonev Committee: a seven-member permanent body, chaired by Metodi Andreev, and a non-perma-nent body with Chairman Georgi Ananiev. The latter could be summoned at the request of the chairman of the former and had the ultimate competence to determine affiliation to the former SS or the Intelli-gence Directorate of the General Staff. According to this law, the files remain in possession of the special services.On 30 May of that year, the Constitutional Court was once more approached by 54 members of parlia-ment who contested the legality of some passages of the new law. This time the Court passed a judg-ment that the law did not generally violate the Consti-tution, with the exception of a single segment, which was repealed accordingly. The Andreev Committee produced ten reports altogether, dealing with the announcement of affiliation of public figures. It had acted on the applications of 23,000 citizens and had examined 44,000 mayor candidates and municipal councillors, and 1,504 candidates for high positions.

Íàðîäíî ñúáðàíèå ïðåç 1997-à ãîäèíà. Êîìè-ñèÿòà, ñúçäàäåíà íà îñíîâàòà íà òîçè çàêîí, å ïîä ïðåäñåäàòåëñòâîòî íà òîãàâàøíèÿ ìèíèñ-òúð íà âúòðåøíèòå ðàáîòè ãåí. Áîãîìèë Áîíåâ. Ñëåä íàïðàâåíàòà ïðîâåðêà â àðõèâà íà ÌÂÐ òÿ îãëàñÿâà â Íàðîäíîòî ñúáðàíèå èìåíàòà íà 23-ìà ïîëèòèöè è äúðæàâíè ñëóæèòåëè, ðàáî-òèëè çà áèâøàòà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò, êàòî 14 îò òÿõ ñà äåïóòàòè â òîãàâàøíèÿ ïàðëàìåíò. Çàêîíúò íÿìà ëóñòðàöèîíåí õàðàêòåð. Ñêîðî îáà÷å ïðàâîìîùèÿòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà „Áîíåâ“ ñà ìàêñèìàëíî îãðàíè÷åíè, òúé êàòî Êîíñòèòóöè-îííèÿò ñúä ñ Ðåøåíèå ¹ 10 îòíåìà âúçìîæ-íîñòòà äà áúäàò îáÿâÿâàíè èìåíàòà íà ëèöàòà ñ ïðèíàäëåæíîñò êúì ÄÑ, çà êîèòî ñà çàïàçåíè ñàìî ðåãèñòðàöèîííè äîêóìåíòè – ò. å. êàòåãî-ðèÿòà íà òàêà íàðå÷åíèòå „êàðòîòåêèðàíè“.×åòèðè ãîäèíè ïî-êúñíî, ïðåç 2001 ã., Çàêîíúò çà äîñòúï äî äîêóìåíòèòå íà áèâøàòà ÄÑ è áèâøåòî Ðàçóçíàâàòåëíî óïðàâëåíèå íà Ãåíå-ðàëíèÿ ùàá å èçìåíåí è äîïúëíåí. Â îáõâà-òà íà ïðîâåðêèòå ñå âêëþ÷âàò è äîêóìåíòèòå íà áèâøèÿ ðàçóçíàâàòåëåí îòäåë íà Ãðàíè÷-íè âîéñêè. Íà ìÿñòîòî íà Êîìèñèÿòà „Áîíåâ“ ñà ñúçäàäåíè 2 êîìèñèè: ïîñòîÿííî äåéñòâà-ùà 7-÷ëåííà ñ ïðåäñåäàòåë Ìåòîäè Àíäðååâ è âòîðà, êîÿòî íå å ïîñòîÿííî äåéñòâàùà, ñ ïðåäñåäàòåë Ãåîðãè Àíàíèåâ, êîÿòî ñå ñâèêâà ïî èñêàíå íà ïðåäñåäàòåëÿ íà ïúðâàòà Êîìè-ñèÿ è óñòàíîâÿâà îêîí÷àòåëíî ïðèíàäëåæíîñ-òòà íà äàäåíî ëèöå êúì áèâøàòà ÄÑ èëè ÐÓ íà ÃÙ. Ñïîðåä òîçè çàêîí àðõèâèòå îñòàâàò âúâ âëàäåíèåòî íà ñïåöèàëíèòå ñëóæáè.Íà 30 ìàé ñúùàòà ãîäèíà 54-ìà äåïóòàòè ñåçè-ðàò ïîðåäíî Êîíñòèòóöèîííèÿ ñúä ïî òåêñòîâå íà ïðèåòèÿ çàêîí. Òîçè ïúò Êîíñòèòóöèîííèÿò ñúä ñå ïðîèçíàñÿ, ÷å çàêîíúò íå å ïðîòèâîêîí-ñòèòóöèîíåí, ñ èçêëþ÷åíèå íà åäèí òåêñò, êîé-òî ñúîòâåòíî å îòìåíåí. Êîìèñèÿòà „Àíäðååâ“ ïðîâåðÿâà ìîëáèòå íà 23 õèëÿäè ãðàæäàíè, 44 õèëÿäè êàíäèäàòè çà êìåòîâå è îáùèíñêè ñú-âåòíèöè è íà 1504 ëèöà, êàíäèäàòè çà âèñîêè ïîñòîâå â äúðæàâàòà. Òÿ èçëèçà ñ 10 äîêëàäà, â êîèòî îáÿâÿâà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò íà ïóáëè÷íè ëèöà. Êîìèñèÿòà „Àíäðååâ“ ðàáîòè ïî-ìàëêî îò ãîäè-íà. Íà 24 àïðèë 2002 ã. 39-îòî Íàðîäíî ñúáðà-

28

The Andreev Committee remained functional for less than a year. On 24 April 2002, the 39th National As-sembly passed the Classified Information Protection Act repealing the law on access to the documents of the former State Security. On 29 September of that same year, the Constitutional Court dismissed the claim of 57 members of parliament that the Clas-sified Information Protection Act violated the Con-stitution. That same month, the Supreme Court of Cassation sentenced General Atanas Semerdzhiev and General Nanka Serkedzhieva to imprisonment of four years and six months, and two years, respec-tively, on charges of destruction of SS files. On 6 December 2006, the 40th National Assembly adopted a new Law on Access on and Disclosure of the Documents and Announcement of Affiliation of Bulgarian Citizens to the State Security and the Intelligence Services of the Bulgarian National Army (LADDAABCSSISBNA). This was the outcome of a long and intense discussion with the involvement of the special services and the marked participation of the community. The nine-member committee pre-sided over by Evtim Kostadinov was elected by the National Assembly on 5 April 2007.Seventeen years after the changes, a national agreement was reached for the archives of the former secret services to be collected, preserved, stored and made public for the sake of history and remembrance.

íèå ïðèåìà Çàêîíà çà çàùèòà íà êëàñèôèöè-ðàíàòà èíôîðìàöèÿ, ñ êîéòî ñå îòìåíÿ Çàêîíúò çà äîñòúï äî àðõèâèòå íà ÄÑ. Ñåçèðàí îò 57 íà-ðîäíè ïðåäñòàâèòåëè íà 29 ñåïòåìâðè ñúùàòà ãîäèíà Êîíñòèòóöèîííèÿò ñúä îòõâúðëÿ èñêàíå-òî èì Çàêîíúò çà çàùèòà íà êëàñèôèöèðàíàòà èíôîðìàöèÿ äà áúäå îáÿâåí çà ïðîòèâîêîíñòè-òóöèîíåí. Ñúùèÿ ìåñåö Âúðõîâíèÿò êàñàöèî-íåí ñúä îñúæäà ãåí. Àòàíàñ Ñåìåðäæèåâ íà 4 ãîäèíè è 6 ìåñåöà è ãåí. Íàíêà Ñåðêåäæèåâà íà 2 ãîäèíè çàòâîð çà óíèùîæàâàíå íà àðõèâà íà ÄÑ.Ñëåä äúëãà è ìú÷èòåëíà äèñêóñèÿ, ñ ó÷àñòèå-òî íà ñïåöèàëíèòå ñëóæáè è ïðè ïîä÷åðòàíà-òà àêòèâíîñò íà îáùåñòâîòî, íà 6 äåêåìâðè 2006 ã., 40-îòî Íàðîäíî ñúáðàíèå ïðèåìà íîâ Çàêîí çà äîñòúï è ðàçêðèâàíå íà äîêóìåíòè-òå è çà îáÿâÿâàíå íà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò íà áúë-ãàðñêè ãðàæäàíè êúì Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà Áúëãàðñêàòà íàðîäíà àðìèÿ. Äåâåò÷ëåííàòà Êîìèñèÿ ñ ïðåäñåäàòåë Åâòèì Êîñòàäèíîâ å èçáðàíà îò Íàðîäíîòî ñúáðàíèå íà 5 àïðèë 2007 ã.Ñåäåìíàäåñåò ãîäèíè ñëåä ïðîìåíèòå Áúëãà-ðèÿ ñòèãà íàé-ïîñëå äî ñúãëàñèå: äîêóìåíòèòå íà áèâøèòå òàéíè ñëóæáè äà áúäàò ñúáèðàíè, çàïàçåíè, ñúõðàíåíè çà èñòîðèÿòà è ãðàæäàí-ñòâîòî äà ïîëó÷è äîñòúï äî òÿõ.


29

The Committee provided a comprehensive ac-count of its activities during its first mandate in

a report presented at an international conference held in Sofia in February 2012.

I. Examination, determination and an-nouncement of affiliation

In compliance with the law, it is the priority of the Committee to announce the affiliation of Bulgar-ian citizens holding public positions or public func-tions to the SS and the intelligence services of the BNA. Official announcement of affiliation of public figures is preceded by mandatory examination as prescribed by law. More than 124,000 persons have been exam-ined for affiliation to the State Security and the intelligence services of the BNA from 2007 till the beginning of 2012. Persons registered to run in elections make up the highest share of manda-tory examinations – over 72,000, followed by for-mer or current holders of public positions or public functions – over 45,000.

Ïðåç ôåâðóàðè 2012 ã. íà ìåæäóíàðîäíà êîíôåðåíöèÿ, ïðîâåäåíà â Ñîôèÿ, Êî-

ìèñèÿòà îò÷åòå äåéíîñòòà îò ïúðâèÿ ñè ìàí-äàò. I. Ïðîâåðêà, óñòàíîâÿâàíå è îáÿâÿâàíå

Êàòî ïúðâîñòåïåííà çàäà÷à îò äåéíîñòòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà çàêîíîäàòåëÿò å èçâåë îáÿâÿâàíåòî íà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò íà áúëãàðñêè ãðàæäàíè, çà-åìàùè ïóáëè÷íà äëúæíîñò èëè èçïúëíÿâàùè ïóáëè÷íè äåéíîñòè êúì ÄÑ è ÐÑ íà ÁÍÀ. Ïðåäè óñòàíîâÿâàíå íà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò è îáÿâÿâàíå â ïóáëè÷íîòî ïðîñòðàíñòâî Êîìèñèÿòà ïðàâè çà-äúëæèòåëíà ïðîâåðêà íà ïóáëè÷íèòå ëèöà ïî óñòàíîâåí îò çàêîíà ðåä. Îò 2007 ã. äî íà÷àëîòî íà 2012 ã. Êîìèñèÿòà å ïðîâåðèëà íàä 124 000 ëèöà çà ïðèíàäëåæ-íîñò êúì ÄÑ è ÐÑ íà ÁÍÀ. Îò çàäúëæèòåëíî ïðîâåðåíèòå ëèöà íàé-ãîëÿì å áðîÿò íà ëèöà-òà, ðåãèñòðèðàíè çà ó÷àñòèå â èçáîðè – íàä 72 -000, ñëåäâàí îò ëèöàòà, çàåìàëè èëè çàå-ìàùè ïóáëè÷íè äëúæíîñòè èëè èçïúëíÿâàùè ïóáëè÷íè äåéíîñòè – íàä 45 000.

Ðàâíîñìåòêàòà 2007–2012 Stocktaking 2007–2012

1. Ëèöà, ðåãèñòðèðàíè çà ó÷àñòèåâ èçáîðè (63 835 ëèöà).

1. Persons registered to run in elections (63,835 persons).

15700

30829

3486

56

13764

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

2007 �. 2008 �. 2009 �. 2010 �. 2011 �.

�� . 26, �. 1, �. 1

�� .26, �. 1, �.1

Persons examinedunder article 26,paragraph 1,sub-paragraph 1

30

Ðàâíîñìåòêàòà (2007–2012 ã.)Stocktaking 2007–2012

2. Ëèöà, çàåìàëè ïóáëè÷íè äëúæíîñòè è èçïúëíÿâàùè ïóáëè÷íè äåéíîñòè (41 798 ëèöà).

3. Èçâúðøåíà ïðåäâàðèòåëíà ïðîâåðêàÏî ñèëàòà íà ÷ë. 27 îò çàêîíà ïîëèòè÷åñêèòå ïàðòèè, îðãàíèòå íà âëàñòòà, îáùåñòâåíèòå è ðåëèãèîçíèòå îðãàíèçàöèè ìîãàò äà ïîèñêàò ïðîâåðêà çà óñòàíîâÿâàíå íà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò, êîÿòî íå ñå îïîâåñòÿâà â ïóáëè÷íîòî ïðîñòðàí-ñòâî. Çà ïåðèîäà íà ðàâíîñìåòêàòà å èçâúð-øåíà ïðåäâàðèòåëíà ïðîâåðêà íà ïîâå÷å îò 6000 äóøè.

2. Former holders of public positions and persons who have performed public service (41,798 persons).

3. Preliminary examinations completedPolitical parties, authorities, public bodies and religious organisations may request examina-tion on the grounds of article 27 of the law, the outcomes of which will not be made available to the public. More than 6,000 persons have been subject to preliminary examination within the relevant period.

2311

6641

8443

1181012593

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

2007 �. 2008 �. 2009 �. 2010 �. 2011 �.

�� . 26, �. 1, �. 2 � �. 3

Persons examinedunder article 26,paragraph 1,sub-paragraph 2and 3

�� . 26, �. 1, �. 2 � �. 3

341 490 43043

4677

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

2007 �. 2008 �. 2009 �. 2010 �. 2011 �.

�� . 27

�� . 27

Preliminaryexaminationunder article 27

31


4. Ëèöà ñ óñòàíîâåíà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò Ñëåä ïðîâåðêàòà ñëåäâà óñòàíîâÿâàíåòî íà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò. Çà îò÷åòåíèÿ ïåðèîä Êîìèñè-ÿòà å óñòàíîâèëà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò íà 6387 ëèöà. Äàííèòå ñà ïóáëèêóâàíè â íàä 300 ðåøåíèÿ.

5. Îáÿâåíè ëèöàÎáÿâåíèòå ëèöà ñà 5782. Ïî çàêîí íå ñå îáÿâÿ-âàò ïî÷èíàëèòå ëèöà è âåðáóâàíèòå ìàëîëåòíè, çà êîèòî íÿìà äàííè äà ñà ïðîäúëæèëè ñúòðóä-íè÷åñòâîòî ñè ñëåä íàâúðøâàíå íà ïúëíîëå-òèå.

4. Cases of determined affiliationAffiliation is determined based on the prior exami-nation findings. Links to the former secret services have been established in 6,387 cases, 6,000 of which were made public knowledge. 300 decisions have been delivered over the reporting period.

5. Cases of announced affiliationAffiliation was announced on 5,782 occasions. Announcements regarding deceased individuals and recruited minors (where no evidence is found of continued collaboration in their adult lives) are expressly prohibited by the law.

995844 826

2048

1674

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2007 �. 2008 �. 2009 �. 2010 �. 2011 �.

��

��

Affiliationdetermined

984817

726

1845

1410

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

��

��

Affiliationannounced

32

II. Establishment of centralisedarchives

In compliance with legal requirements, the Com-mittee has established centralised archives to house the documents of the SS and the intel-ligence services of the BNA. Work commenced immediately on acquiring and putting together re-lated historical records. Meanwhile, the construc-tion of a modern site began in Bankya. The two buildings of the archives are end destinations and state-of-the-art shelving facilities that main-tain a controlled temperature and humidity envi-ronment, prolonging the useful life of the original materials.

II. Èçãðàæäàíå íà öåíòðàëèçèðàíàðõèâ

Êîìèñèÿòà èçïúëíè èçèñêâàíåòî ïî çàêîí è ñúçäàäå öåíòðàëèçèðàí àðõèâ íà äîêóìåíòèòå íà ÄÑ è ÐÑ íà ÁÍÀ. Ïðèåìàíåòî íà äîêóìåí-òè è ïîïúëâàíåòî íà àðõèâà çàïî÷íà îò ïúðâèÿ äåí íà íåéíàòà ðàáîòà. Ìåæäóâðåìåííî áå èç-ãðàäåí ìîäåðåí êîìïëåêñ â ãðàä Áàíêÿ. Äâàòà ãîëåìè êîðïóñà, â êîèòî ñå ïîìåùàâàò àðõè-âèòå, ñà îáîðóäâàíè ñ íàé-ñúâðåìåííèòå ñòå-ëàæíè ñèñòåìè, à äîêóìåíòèòå ñå ñúõðàíÿâàò ïðè ðåæèì, êîéòî îòãîâàðÿ íà íàé-âèñîêî-òåõ-íîëîãè÷íèòå èçèñêâàíèÿ îòíîñíî ãðèæàòà êúì çàïàçâàíå íà îðèãèíàëèòå.

Ñãðàäèòå, ïðåäîñòàâåíè íà Êîìèñèÿòà çà àðõèâîõðàíèëèùàAt the beginning

Ïðåîäîëÿâàéêè ðåäèöà òðóäíîñòè, ñâúðçàíè ñ îñèãóðÿâàíåòî íà ñãðàäåí ôîíä, è ñëåä ïðîâå-äåí ìàùàáåí ðåìîíò, íà 8 ôåâðóàðè 2011 ãî-äèíà îôèöèàëíî áå îòêðèò öåíòðàëèçèðà íèÿò àðõèâ íà Êîìèñèÿòà â Áàíêÿ. Â ñãðàäèòå íà ìî-äåðíèÿ êîðïóñ äîêóìåíòèòå íà àðõèâà ñå ðàç-ïðåäåëÿò â 13 ïîñòîÿííè àðõèâîõðàíèëèùà è 9 àðõèâîõðàíèëèùà çà âðåìåííî ñúõðàíåíèå íà

This was a challenging project with more than a few obstacles to overcome to secure perma-nent housing for the files. The official opening of the centralised archives of the Committee in Bankya took place on 8 February 2011 following major repair works. Relying on up-to-date tech-nologies, thirteen permanent and nine tempo-rary depositories provide accommodation to the


33

Êúäå è êàê ñå ñúõðàíÿâàòäîêóìåíòèòå äíåñ

Nowadays

documentary heritage of the past. Descriptive inventory of all documents is available. Each deposit of records is placed within the overall arrangement and classification scheme to re-flect its origin and the principle of provenance. Housed in a build-up area of 2,364.01 square metres and a total floor area of 10,926.04 square metres, the centralised archives have its own laboratory for disinfection, restoration and preservation of documents.

äåëàòà. Òå ñå îïèñâàò è ïîäðåæäàò âúç îñíîâà íà óòâúðäåíà ñõåìà çà ïîäðåæäàíå íà äîêó-ìåíòèòå ñúîáðàçíî èçòî÷íèêà è ïðè ïðèëàãà-íå ïðèíöèïà íà ïðîèçõîäà. Ñãðàäíèÿò ôîíä íà öåíòðàëèçèðàíèÿ àðõèâ å ñúñ çàñòðîåíà ïëîù 2 364,01 êâ. ìåòðà è ðàçãúíàòà çàñòðîåíà ïëîù 10 926,04 êâ. ìåòðà. Ñúçäàäåíà å è ëàáîðàòî-ðèÿ çà îáåçïàðàçèòÿâàíå è äåçèíôåêöèÿ íà àð-õèâíèòå äåëà, êàêòî è íà òÿõíîòî ðåñòàâðèðàíå è êîíñåðâèðàíå.


34

III. Preservation of documents

All documents of interest are collected from the bodies referred to in article 1 of the applicable law and handed over to the Archives Directorate, comprising the Specialised Archives and Card-index Department (SACI) and the Acquisition and Preservation of the Archives Department (APA). Data files on secret collaborators, files of staff employees, archival diaries, registers and regis-tration diaries, files on operative targets, destruc-tion protocols, files on archive groups are kept at the Specialised Archives and Card-index Department. Archival files are kept safe at the Acquisition and Preservation of the Archives Department (APA). In this first period of stock-taking the centralised archives have become the end destination for 817,021 paper files of over 8,000 linear metres, 5,651 photographic negatives of documents, 5,353 documents in electronic form and 250 video recordings taken on 35-millimetre film for demonstration purpos-es. The number of items processed and depos-ited on the new storage premises is estimated to have reached more than two million paper documents within the first year following the opening of the centralised archives. Numbers increase when account is taken of information in electronic and analog format, negatives and remaining reference material.

The rising curve in the chart below illustrates the growing number of documents received at the archives over the relevant period.

III. Ñúõðàíÿâàíå íà äîêóìåíòèòå

Âúç îñíîâà ðàçïîðåäáèòå íà çàêîíà àðõèâíèòå äîêóìåíòè ñå ïðèåìàò îò îðãàíèòå ïî ÷ë. 1 îò çàêîíà è ïîñòúïâàò â Äèðåêöèÿ „Àðõèâ“, âêëþ÷-âàùà îòäåë „Ñïåöèàëèçèðàí àðõèâ è êàðòîòåêà“ (ÑÀÊ) è îòäåë „Êîìïëåêòóâàíå è ñúõðàíåíèå íà àðõèâà“ (ÊÑÀ). Â îòäåë „Ñïåöèàëèçèðàí àðõèâ è êàðòî-òåêà“ ñå ñúõðàíÿâàò: êàðòîòåêè íà ñåêðåòíè ñúòðóäíèöè; êàðòîíè íà ùàòíè ñëóæèòåëè; àðõèâíè äíåâíèöè; ðåãèñòðè, ðåãèñòðàöèîí-íè äíåâíèöè; êàðòîíè íà îáåêòè; ïðîòîêîëè çà óíèùîæàâàíå; äåëà ïî ôîíäîâåòå. Â îòäåë „Êîìïëåêòóâàíå è ñúõðàíåíèå íà àðõèâà“ (ÊÑÀ) ñå ñúõðàíÿâàò àðõèâíèòå äåëà. Çà ïå-ðèîäà íà ðàâíîñìåòêàòà â öåíòðàëèçèðàíèÿ àðõèâ ñà çàâåäåíè íà ñúõðàíåíèå íà õàðòèåí íîñèòåë 817 021 àðõèâíè äåëà, ñúñòàâëÿâàùè íàä 8000 ëèíåéíè ìåòðà, íåãàòèâè íà ôèë-ìèðàíè äîêóìåíòè – 5651 áðîÿ, äîêóìåíòè íà åëåêòðîíåí íîñèòåë – 5353 áðîÿ è ôèëìîâè ìàòåðèàëè íà 35-ìèëèìåòðîâà ëåíòà ñ ó÷åáíà öåë – 250 áðîÿ. Ñàìî çà ãîäèíà ñëåä îòêðèâà-íåòî íà öåíòðàëèçèðàíèÿ àðõèâ ñà îáðàáîòå-íè è ïîäðåäåíè â íîâèòå ìîäåðíè àðõèâîõðà-íèëèùà íàä äâà ìèëèîíà äîêóìåíòè. Êúì äîêóìåíòèòå íà õàðòèåí íîñèòåë òðÿáâà äà ñå ïðèáàâÿò îùå è òåçè íà åëåêòðîíåí è àíàëî-ãîâ íîñèòåë, áðîÿò íà íåãàòèâèòå è íà îñòàíà-ëèòå ñïðàâî÷íè ìàñèâè.

Ïðèåìàíåòî íà äîêóìåíòè ñëåäâà ïîêàçàíà-òà ãðàôèêà.


35

IV. Our reading room

The number of visitors to our reading room reached 7,697 by 20 February 2012. 12,635 applications requesting access to the files were submitted.

5,770 applicants have exercised their right to ac-cess the records centre under the Political and Civil Rehabilitation of Victims of Repressions Act.

IV. Íàøàòà ÷èòàëíÿ

Äî 20 ôåâðóàðè 2012 ãîäèíà ÷èòàëíÿòà íà Êî-ìèñèÿòà å ïîñåòåíà îò 7697 ëèöà. Çàÿâëåíèÿ çà ïðîâåðêà ñà ïîäàëè îáùî 12 635 ëèöà.

Âúâ âðúçêà ñ ïðèëàãàíåòî íà Çàêîíà çà ïîëè-òè÷åñêà è ãðàæäàíñêà ðåàáèëèòàöèÿ ìîëáè ñà ïîäàëè 5770 ëèöà.

689

1 596

1 2941 146

1 417

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2007 �. 2008 �. 2009 �. 2010 �. 2011 �.

��

��

Applica�onssubmi�ed bymembers of thegeneral public


1322 650030179

453082

817021

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

700000

800000

900000

2007 �. 2008 �. 2009 �. 2010 �. 2011 �.

��

��

Acquisi�onsthe APA

at

36

723 journalists, researchers and fact finders have requested access to consult the collections.

The centralised collection of records draws in-creasing attention from the general public and experts alike. Reference aids and search mecha-nisms devised to facilitate information retrieval are made available for the specific purposes of research and study. Observations reflect a grow-ing appeal among foreign scientists and analysts to take a closer look at the historical facts. The archives became a source material for scholars and writers. Publications, books, movie scripts, documentary and feature films, based on the data they store, began to pile up.

Æóðíàëèñòèòå, èçñëåäîâàòåëèòå è ïðîó÷âàòå-ëèòå, çàÿâèëè äîêóìåíòè çà çàïîçíàâàíå ïî òåìè, ñà 723.

Âèäèì å ðúñòúò íà èíòåðåñà êúì äîêóìåíòèòå îò öåíòðàëèçèðàíèÿ àðõèâ íà Êîìèñèÿòà. Ñïå-öèàëíî çà èçñëåäîâàòåëèòå áå ñúçäàäåí íà-ó÷íî-ñïðàâî÷åí àïàðàò, âêëþ÷âàù àðõèâíèòå åäèíèöè, êîèòî ñå ñúõðàíÿâàò â öåíòðàëèçè-ðàíèÿ àðõèâ. Ïîâèøè ñå èíòåðåñúò è îò ñòðàíà íà ÷óæäåñòðàííèòå èçñëåäîâàòåëè. Âúç îñíî-âà íà ðàçñåêðåòåíèòå äîêóìåíòè çàïî÷íàõà äà èçëèçàò ðàçëè÷íè êíèãè, äà ñå ïèøàò ñöåíà-ðèè è äà ñå ðåàëèçèðàò äîêóìåíòàëíè è èãðàë-íè ôèëìè.

10

118

196 188211

0

50

100

150

200

250

2007 �. 2008 �. 2009 �. 2010 �. 2011 �.

��

��

Applica�onssubmi�ed byjournalists andresearchers


Applica�onsunder thePCRVRA

37

V. Èçñëåäâàíå è ïóáëè÷íîñòíà àðõèâà

Â ñòðåìåæà ñè êúì îñèãóðÿâàíåòî íà âñå ïî-ãîëÿìà ïóáëè÷íîñò íà àðõèâíèòå äîêóìåíòè Êîìèñèÿòà, ãîäèíà ñëåä èçáî-ðà º, ñòàðòèðà ñ ïîðåäèöàòà „Èç àðõèâèòå íà ÄÑ“ – äîêó-ìåíòàëíè ñáîðíèöè, ñúäúð-æàùè ôàêñèìèëåòà íà îðèãè-íàëíè äîêóìåíòè ïî ðàçëè÷íè òåìè. Îáùåñòâîòî è ãëàâíî èçñëåäîâàòåëèòå ïðèåõà ñ ãî-ëÿì èíòåðåñ ðàçñåêðåòåíèòå äîêóìåíòè. Ïóáëèêóâàíèòå àðõèâíè åäèíèöè ïðåäèçâè-êàõà øèðîê îáùåñòâåí èí-òåðåñ è áÿõà âèñîêî îöåíåíè îò èñòîðè÷åñêàòà àêàäåìè÷íà îáùíîñò. Çà ïúðâèÿ ìàíäàò Êîìèñèÿòà ïîäãîòâè 9 ñáîðíè-êà ñ äîêóìåíòè íà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è ÐÑ íà ÁÍÀ: „ÊÃÁ è ÄÑ – âðúçêè è çàâèñèìîñòè“; „ÄÑ – îñíîâ-íè äîêóìåíòè“; „ÄÑ è ïðîìåíèòå â Áúëãàðèÿ (ñåïòåìâðè 1944–äåêåìâðè 1947 ã.)“; „Ìåæ-äóíàðîäíèÿò òåðîðèçúì â äîêóìåíòèòå íà ÄÑ“; „ÄÑ – ïîëèòè÷åñêà ïîëèöèÿ“; „ÄÑ è îá-ðàçîâàíèåòî“; „Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è Ïðàæ-êàòà ïðîëåò“; „Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò è êðàÿò íà òîòàëèòàðèçìà“; „Âîåííîòî ðàçóçíàâàíå ïðåç êîìóíèçìà“. Êúì òÿõ áÿõà ïðèëîæåíè è DVD ðàçøèðåíè âàðèàíòè íà èçäèðåíèòå è èç-ñëåäâàíèòå äîêóìåíòè. Îáùî ïóáëèêóâàíèòå àðõèâíè äîêóìåíòè âêëþ÷âàò íàä 20 000 ñòðà-íèöè.Â èçïúëíåíèå íà çàêîíà Êîìèñèÿòà ïóáëèêó-âà ñâîèòå ðåøåíèÿ â 8 áþëåòèíà è èçäàäå äâå áðîøóðè ñ èíôîðìàöèÿ çà äåéíîñòòà ñè. Ïðî-äóöèðà è ó÷àñòâà â ïðîöåñà ïî ïîäãîòîâêàòà íà äîêóìåíòàëíèÿ ôèëì „Äîñèåòî íà ÄÑ“.Çà ïúðâèÿ ìàíäàò îò äåéíîñòòà ñè Êîìèñèÿòà ïðåäñòàâè ïðåä Íàðîäíîòî ñúáðàíèå 10 äîêëà-äà, êîèòî âèíàãè ñà áèëè ïðèåìàíè áåç ñúùåñò-âåíè áåëåæêè.

V. Research and publicity of thearchives

In pursuit of the idea of wider publicity, the Committee launched its publishing efforts within the year follow-

ing its establishment. A Journey through the Archives of the State Security is a series of collections compiled of duplicates of original documents on a variety of top-ics. The public release of former secret files met with considerable interest from the public and mainly from researchers. These publi-cations were widely welcomed by the community and highly ap-preciated by the academia of his-tory. The first term of office of the Committee saw the publication of nine collections of records of the State Security and the intelligence services of the BNA: The KGB and the Bulgarian State Security

Service. Connections and Dependences; State Se-curity – Main Documents; The State Security and Changes in Bulgaria (September 1944–December 1947); International Terrorism in the Documents of the State Security; State Security – Political Police; State Security and Education; State Security and the Prague Spring; State Security and the End of Totali-tarianism; Military Intelligence under Communism. An extended selection of the researched materials was made available on DVD to supplement each of the above. More than 20,000 pages of documents have been published in the process.The Committee for the Secret Police Files has re-leased eight bulletins and two brochures to announce its decisions and report its activity, respectively. It was involved in the producing and pre-production of the documentary The Secret File on the State Se-curity.The Committee provided comprehensive accounts of its activities during its first mandate in ten activ-ity reports presented before the National Assembly, each received without significant comment.

thrSecodoicsseintfrocabyprtorConinStsean


38

I. Çíà÷èìîñò

Ãàðàíöèÿ çà óñïåõà íà Êîìèñèÿòà å äà ïðî-äúëæàâà âúçïðèåòîòî îò íåÿ ïîâåäåíèå çà

ïîëèòè÷åñêà íåîáâúðçàíîñò è äèñòàíöèÿ îò êî-íþíêòóðàòà íà äåíÿ. Çà ïåðèîäà îò åäíà ãîäè-íà ÷ëåíîâåòå íà âòîðèÿ ìàíäàò íà Êîìèñèÿòà ñëåäâàò ïîëèòèêàòà íà îáåêòèâíîñò, åôåêòèâíîñò è êîìïåòåíòíîñò. ×ðåç äåéíîñòòà ñè òå ðåàëíî ñïîìàãàò çà óòâúðæäàâàíåòî íà Áúëãàðèÿ êàòî ìîäåðíà, ïðàâîâà è äåìîêðàòè÷íà åâðîïåéñêà äúðæàâà. Êîëåãèàëíèÿò îðãàí ñå ñòðåìè äà çà-äúëáî÷è ñâîåòî ñúòðóäíè÷åñòâî ñ îñíîâíèòå ñè ïàðòíüîðè â Áúëãàðèÿ è â Åâðîïåéñêèÿ ñúþç. Â ïðèåòàòà íîâà Ñòðàòåãèÿ çà ðàçâèòèå çà ïå-ðèîäà îò 2012 äî 2017 ãîäèíà Êîìèñèÿòà îòðà-çÿâà ñâîèòå öåëè, ïðèíöèïè è öåííîñòè.

II. Öåëè

Öåëèòå íà Êîìèñèÿòà â ñòðàòåãè÷åñêè ïëàí ñà:� äà äîèçãðàäè öåíòðàëèçèðàíèÿ àðõèâ;� äà óñòàíîâÿâà è îáÿâÿâà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò;� äà ïðåäîñòàâÿ äîñòúï äî äîêóìåíòèòå;� äà èçäèðâà, ïðîó÷âà è àíàëèçèðà äîêóìåí-

òè;� äà áúäå íàäåæäåí ïàðòíüîð.

III. Ïðèíöèïè

Ïðèíöèïèòå â äåéíîñòòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà ñå îï-ðåäåëÿò îò ñòðåìåæà íà Êîìèñèÿòà äà èçãðàäè è ïîääúðæà âèñîêî îáùåñòâåíî äîâåðèå íà îñ-íîâàòà íà:� çàêîííîñò;� îáåêòèâíîñò;� èñòîðè÷åñêà îòãîâîðíîñò è áåçïðèñòðàñò-

íîñò;� ïðîçðà÷íîñò;� åôåêòèâíîñò;� äîñòúïíîñò.

IV. Öåííîñòè

Öåííîñòèòå ñå îñíîâàâàò íà:� íåäîïóñêàíå óâðåæäàíå èíòåðåñèòå íà Ðåïó-

áëèêà Áúëãàðèÿ;

I. Impact

The Committee will continue to successfully ful-fill its mandate under the commitment to main-

tain its present policy to operate independently of political interference and bias, and uphold impar-tiality. One year into its second mandate, the mem-bers of the Committee applied the highest levels of objectivity, neutrality, efficiency of work and competence. The Committee, through its commit-ment, has made a valid contribution to promoting the image of Bulgaria as an established modern European democracy under the rule of law. This collegiate authority aims to strengthen coopera-tion with its key partners on a national and com-munity level.The Committee’s objectives, principles and values are taken up in the new Development Strategy ad-opted for the period 2012-2017.

II. Objectives

The strategic focus of the Committee is to:� complete the centralised archives;� determine and announce affiliation;� ensure the availability of documents;� find, research and analyse documents;� ensure a reliable partnership.

III. Principles

In the pursuit of establishing and maintaining a high level of public confidence the Committee is guided by the principles of:� legality;� objectivity;� historical responsibility and impartiality;� transparency;� efficiency;� availability.

IV. Values

Our values are founded on the concepts of:� avoidance of damage to Bulgarian national in-

terests;

Öåëè è ìèñèÿ Goals and missioníà Ìàíäàò 2012–2017 ã. 2012–2017

39

Öåëè è ìèñèÿ íà Ìàíäàò 2012–2017 ã.Goals and mission 2012–2017

� îáùåñòâåíî äîâåðèå è ïîëèòè÷åñêà íåîá-âúðçàíîñò;

� êîëåãèàëíî íà÷àëî è êîíñåíñóñ ïðè âçåìàíå íà ðåøåíèÿòà;

� åôåêòèâíî è êà÷åñòâåíî îáñëóæâàíå èíòåðå-ñèòå íà ãðàæäàíèòå;

� âèñîêà ìîòèâàöèÿ è ðàçâèòèå íà êàäðîâèÿ ïîòåíöèàë.

V. Ìèñèÿ

Ìèñèÿòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà å ñòðèêòíî äà èçïúëíÿ-âà çàäúëæåíèÿòà ñè ïî çàêîí:� äà óñòàíîâÿâà è îáÿâÿâà ïðèíàäëåæíîñò êúì

ÄÑ è ÐÑ íà ÁÍÀ íà áúëãàðñêè ãðàæäàíè, çà-åìàëè èëè çàåìàùè ïóáëè÷íè äëúæíîñòè, èçâúðøâàëè èëè èçâúðøâàùè ïóáëè÷íè äåé-íîñòè;

� äà ïðèêëþ÷è ïîïúëâàíåòî íà öåíòðàëèçèðà-íèÿ àðõèâ ñ äîêóìåíòèòå íà îðãàíèòå ïî ÷ë. 1 îò çàêîíà, ñúñòàâåíè â ïåðèîäà îò 9 ñåïòåì-âðè 1944 ã. äî 16 þëè 1991 ã.;

� äà îñèãóðè äîñòúï äî òåçè äîêóìåíòè.

Êîìèñèÿòà, â èçïúëíåíèå íà ñâîÿòà ìèñèÿ, ñå ñòðåìè äà ïðèëàãà íå åäèíñòâåíî „áóêâàòà íà çà-êîíà“, íî è „äóõà íà çàêîíà“. Äóõúò íà çàêîíà òÿ îòêðèâà âúâ ôðàçàòà „Èñòèíàòà íè ïðàâè ñâî-áîäíè“. Ñ äåéíîñòòà ñè Êîìèñèÿòà ñå ñòðåìè äà ñïîìîãíå äà áúäàò ïðåêúñíàòè âúçìîæíîñòèòå íà çàäêóëèñíî âëèÿíèå, ðåêåò è øàíòàæ âúðõó ïîëèòè÷åñêèÿ æèâîò ïîñðåäñòâîì íåïî÷òåíà è íåðåãëàìåíòèðàíà çëîóïîòðåáà ñ äîêóìåíòèòå íà ÄÑ è ÐÑ íà ÁÍÀ è ïî òîçè íà÷èí äà îñèãóðè ïðàâîòî íà ïðîçðà÷íîñò íà îáùåñòâîòî äà çíàå êîé ãî óïðàâëÿâà è êîé ãðàäè íåãîâèòå ìîðàëíè äîáðîäåòåëè. Ñëåäâàéêè òàçè ìèñèÿ è ïðåç ìàíäàò 2012 – 2017 ã., îñíîâíàòà çàäà÷à, êîÿòî ñè ïîñòàâÿò ÷ëåíîâåòå íà Êîìèñèÿòà, å äà ïîâèøàò êà-÷åñòâîòî íà ñâîÿòà ðàáîòà. Â ïî-òåñåí ïëàí òîâà âêëþ÷âà òðè ïðèîðèòåòíè íàïðàâëåíèÿ: àðõèâ, èçñëåäâàíå è ïóáëè÷íîñò íà àðõèâèòå è îáñëóæâàíå íà ãðàæäàíè.Öåíòðàëèçèðàí àðõèâÎñíîâíàòà çàäà÷à å äà áúäàò ïðèáðàíè âñè÷êè äîêóìåíòè îò îðãàíèòå ïî ÷ë. 1 îò çàêîíà è äà

� public trust and political neutrality;� dialogue and consensus in decision-

making;� quality and efficiency of service to appropriately

address the interests of citizens;� high motivation and development of the staff’s

potential.

V. Mission

It is our mission to implement the strict require-ments of the applicable law in terms of:� determining and announcing affiliation to the

SS and the intelligence services of the BNA of Bulgarian citizens former or present holders of public positions or persons who have, now or in the past, performed public service;

� completing the transfer of the documents of the bodies referred to in article 1 of the law composed in the period between 9 September 1944 and 16 July 1991 to the centralised archive;� ensuring access to these documents.

In performing its tasks, the Committee aims at obeying not only the letter of the law, but the spirit of the law as well. The spirit of the law is contained within the phrase ‘The truth sets free’. It is our goal to further reduce opportunities for behind the scene interference, string pulling and intimidation of political actors through foul play and intentional misuse of documents of the State Security and the BNA intelligence services for harmful purposes, thus ensuring transparency in the political arena and revealing the identity of those setting up the standards of morality in society. Enhancing the performance of the Committee is essential, if the long-term objectives set by our in-stitution are to be achieved. It has therefore been placed highest on the list of priorities for the 2012–2017 mandate. Efforts will be narrowed down to three priorities: archives, research work, promo-tion of the archives and service to citizens.

Centralised archivesThe primary task is to bring together the en-tire collections of documents of the bodies re-

40


áúäå îáðàáîòåíà è êà÷åíà íà åëåêòðîíåí íî-ñèòåë îñíîâíàòà ÷àñò îò äîêóìåíòèòå, ñúõðàíÿ-âàíè â öåíòðàëèçèðàíèÿ àðõèâ íà Êîìèñèÿòà, êàòî çà öåëòà áúäå:� èçâúðøåíî ïúëíî îêîìïëåêòîâàíå íà äîêó-

ìåíòèòå îò öåíòðàëèçèðàíèÿ àðõèâ;� çàâúðøåí ïðîöåñúò ïî îêîí÷àòåëíîòî ïðèå-

ìàíå íà êàðòîòåêèòå îò Íàöèîíàëíàòà ðàçóç-íàâàòåëíà ñëóæáà íà Ïúðâî ãëàâíî óïðàâëå-íèå íà ÄÑ çà ñúòðóäíèöè è îáåêòè;

� çàâúðøåí ïðîöåñúò ïî îêîí÷àòåëíîòî ïðèåìà-íå íà ñïðàâî÷íèÿ àïàðàò îò Ìèíèñòåðñòâîòî íà îòáðàíàòà – Ñëóæáà „Âîåííà èíôîðìàöèÿ“;� èçâúðøåíî ïúëíî îêîìïëåêòîâàíå íà äîêó-

ìåíòèòå îò öåíòðàëèçèðàíèÿ àðõèâ;� ðàçãúðíàòà äåéíîñòòà ïî ðåñòàâðàöèÿ, äèãè-

òàëèçàöèÿ è çàñòðàõîâàíå íà àðõèâíèòå äîêó-ìåíòè.

Èçñëåäâàíå è ïóáëè÷íîñò íà àðõèâèòåÎñíîâíàòà çàäà÷à íà íàñòîÿùèÿ ìàíäàò å äà èçãðàäè îñíîâèòå íà åäèí áúäåù Èíñòèòóò çà íàöèîíàëíà ïàìåò, êàòî ïðèñòúïè êúì èçïúëíå-íèåòî íà ñëåäíèòå çàäà÷è:� Äà ïðîäúëæè èçäàâàíåòî íà äîêóìåíòàëíè

ñáîðíèöè îò ïîðåäèöàòà „Èç àðõèâèòå íà ÄÑ“ ñ ïóáëèêóâàíåòî íà îðèãèíàëíè äîêóìåíòè ïî îáùåñòâåíî-çíà÷èìè òåìè. Â èçïúëíåíèå íà òàçè çàäà÷à ïðåç 2012 ãîäèíà, ïî âðåìå íà ìàíäàò 2012–2017 ã., áå ïóáëèêóâàí äîêóìåí-òàëíèÿò ñáîðíèê „ÄÑ è åâðåéñêàòà îáùíîñò â Áúëãàðèÿ“.

� Äà ñòàðòèðà äåéíîñòòà ïî ïîäãîòîâêàòà íà èçëîæáè ñ îáðàçîâàòåëíî-èíôîðìàöèîíåí õàðàêòåð, â êîèòî äîêóìåíòàëíî è ñúñ ñíèì-êîâ ìàòåðèàë äà ñå ðàçêðèâà âñå ïî-öÿëîñòíî êàðòèíàòà îêîëî äåéíîñòòà íà áèâøèòå òàéíè ñëóæáè. Â èçïúëíåíèå íà òàçè çàäà÷à å ïëàíè-ðàíà èçëîæáà, ñâúðçàíà òåìàòè÷íî ñ äåñåòè-ëåòèåòî ñëåä ñìúðòòà íà Ñòàëèí è ïðîìåíèòå â Èçòî÷íà Åâðîïà è â õàðàêòåðà íà Ñòóäåíàòà âîéíà.

� Äà ñå ðàçøèðè ìðåæàòà îò ïàðòíüîðñòâà ñ äúðæàâíè èíñòèòóöèè, íåïðàâèòåëñòâåíè îð-ãàíèçàöèè è àêàäåìè÷íàòà îáùíîñò â ðåàëè-çèðàíåòî íà îáùè ìàùàáíè ïðîåêòè. Ïúðâàòà ñòúïêà â òàçè ïîñîêà áå ïîäïèñàíîòî íîâî

ferred to in article 1 of the law, and to process and digitalise the bulk of documents stored at the centralised archives of the Committee by:� completing the centralised archives as far as

records allow;� completing the transfer of card indexes of

the National Intelligence Service at the First Head Directorate of the State Security relat-ing to collaborators and operative targets;

� completing the transfer of the reference aids of the Military Information Office under the Minis-try of Defence.

� carrying out restoration, digitalisation and conservation activities with respect to the ar-chives.

Research and publicity of the archivesIt is this mandate’s priority objective to shape the foundations of a future Institute for National Re-membrance by taking forward to implementation the following tasks: � carrying on the publication of documentary

collections from the series A Journey through the Archives of the State Security by releasing declassified originals on topics of economic and social relevance. As a step in implement-ing this agenda, in 2012, the second mandate saw the publication of the collection of docu-ments under the title The State Security and the Jewish Community in Bulgaria;

� commencing preparation of education and public awareness exhibitions intended to pres-ent an overall picture of the methods and prac-tices of the former secret services by way of photographs and text. A thematic exhibition on the decade following Stalin’s death, the chang-es in Eastern Europe and the turning points in the nature of the Cold War is planned to that end;

� extending the network of partnerships with state institutions, non-governmental organisa-tions and the academia within the framework of joint large-scale projects. The first step has already been taken by signing a new Frame-work agreement with the Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski;

41


Ðàìêîâî ñïîðàçóìåíèå ñúñ Ñîôèéñêèÿ óíèâåð-ñèòåò „Ñâ. Êëèìåíò Îõ-ðèäñêè“.

� Äà ñå êîíöåíòðèðà äåé-íîñòòà âúðõó ïîïóëÿðè-çèðàíå íà èçñëåäîâà-òåëñêèòå âúçìîæíîñòè, ñâúðçàíè ñ ïðîó÷âàíå-òî è àíàëèçèðàíåòî íà äîêóìåíòèòå, ñúõðàíÿ-âàíè â öåíòðàëèçèðà-íèÿ àðõèâ íà Êîìèñè-ÿòà ïîñðåäñòâîì íîâè è ðàçíîîáðàçíè èíè-öèàòèâè. Â òàçè âðúçêà ïðåç 2013 ãîäèíà ñå ïëàíèðà îðãàíèçèðà-íåòî è ïðîâåæäàíåòî íà êèíîëåêòîðèÿ íà òåìà „ÄÑ â êèíîòî“.

� Äà ñå ðàçâèå ïóáëè÷-íàòà äåéíîñò â ïîñîêà ó÷àñòèå âúâ âñå ïîâå÷å êîíôåðåíöèè è ñåìèíà-ðè ó íàñ è â ÷óæáèíà.

� Äà ñå ïðîäúëæè òðàäè-öèÿòà ïî îðãàíèçèðàíå íà ìåæäóíàðîäíè êîíôåðåíöèè, â êîèòî èç-ñëåäîâàòåëè äà ðàçèñêâàò ñúäúðæàíèåòî íà àðõèâíèòå äîêóìåíòè ïî äàäåíà òåìà.

� Àêòóàëíî ïîääúðæàíå èíôîðìàöèÿòà â èíòåð-íåò ñòðàíèöàòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà è ñòðåìåæ êúì ìàêñèìàëíà ïóáëè÷íîñò ïðè ðåàëèçèðàíåòî íà âñÿêà äåéíîñò, ñâúðçàíà ñ èçïúëíåíèåòî íà çàêîíà. Âå÷å å ïîäîáðåíà è îáîãàòåíà àí-ãëèéñêàòà âåðñèÿ íà ñàéòà, îáñúæäàò ñå èäåè, ñâúðçàíè ñ îáîãàòÿâàíå èíôîðìàöèÿòà â ðó-áðèêèòå íà ñàéòà è ñúçäàâàíåòî íà íîâè.

Îáñëóæâàíå íà ãðàæäàíèÎñíîâíàòà çàäà÷à, ñâúðçàíà ñ ðàçøèðÿâàíå âúçìîæíîñòèòå çà îñèãóðÿâàíå íà âñå ïî-øè-ðîê äîñòúï äî äîêóìåíòèòå íà Äúðæàâíà ñè-ãóðíîñò è ðàçóçíàâàòåëíèòå ñëóæáè íà Áúëãàð-ñêàòà íàðîäíà àðìèÿ, Êîìèñèÿòà ïîñòàâè êàòî ñâîé ïðèîðèòåò è:

� concentrating efforts on promoting the re-search, exploration and analysis of the documental heritage kept at the centralised archives of the Com-mittee through a vari-ety of new initiatives. Preparations are un-der way to organise a week-long film lecture on the topic of The Presence of the State Security in the Cin-ema, set to take place in 2013;

� diversifying participa-tion in a growing num-ber of public events, conferences and seminars at home and abroad;

� upholding the tradition of organising internation-al conferences on a vari-ety of topics reflected in

documents from the archives;

� keeping the website of the Committee up to date and seeking maximum public exposure on every step of implementation of the applicable law. The website has been upgraded to include an advanced English version. Suggestions on extending the scope of information and creating new modules are under consideration.

Service to citizensIn pursue of added possibilities to further extend access to the documents of the State Security and the intelligence services of the Bulgarian National Army to a wider audience, the Committee suc-cessfully achieved its priorities to:

� set up a new, better-equipped and more spa-cious reading facility to meet the specialised

�

��

�� ofal et

42

� îáîðóäâà íîâà, ïî-ãîëÿìà, ñïåöèàëèçèðàíà ÷èòàëíÿ, ïðåäíàçíà÷åíà çà ðàáîòà íà æóð-íàëèñòè, èçñëåäîâàòåëè è ïðîó÷âàòåëè;

� äîðàçâè âúòðåøíèòå ïðàâèëà çà ðàáîòà íà îòäåë „Îáñëóæâàíå íà ãðàæäàíè“ ïî ïîñî-êà ïî-äîáðîòî èçïúëíÿâàíå íà äåéíîñòòà ïî îñèãóðÿâàíåòî íà äîñòúï äî äîêóìåíòèòå íà öåíòðàëèçèðàíèÿ àðõèâ íà Êîìèñèÿòà;

� ñúçäàäå íîâà, ïî-ãúâêàâà, îðãàíèçàöèÿ â äåé-íîñòòà ïî îáñëóæâàíåòî íà ãðàæäàíèòå â èç-ïúëíåíèå íà ñòðåìåæà êúì íåäîïóñêàíå çàáà-âÿíå èçïúëíåíèåòî íà çàâåäåíèòå ïðåïèñêè.

purposes of journalists, researchers and fact finders;

� further elaborate the internal rules of proce-dure of the Service to Citizens Department to enhance work performance and improve the availability of written resources at the centra-lised archives of the Committee;

� apply a new, more flexible approach to citizen service aiming to avoid delays in handling re-quests for access.

Íàøàòà íîâà ÷èòàëíÿOur new reading room


43

Ïàðòíüîðñòâà Partnerships

Çàì.-ïðåäñåäàòåëÿò íà Êîìèñèÿòà À. Õàäæèíà êîíôåðåíöèÿ íà BSTU (Áåðëèí, 2012 ã.)

Vice-chairman A. Hadzhi at a conference of BSTU(Berlin, 2012)

Â ñâîÿòà äåéíîñò Êîìèñèÿòà çàëàãà íà îòêðè-òîñò è ñúòðóäíè÷åñòâî ñ äúðæàâíè èíñòèòó-

öèè, íåïðàâèòåëñòâåíè è îáùåñòâåíè îðãàíè-çàöèè. Îðãàíèçèðà ìíîæåñòâî ïðåäñòàâèòåëíè ìåæäóíàðîäíè êîíôåðåíöèè, à ÷ëåíîâåòå º ðåãóëÿðíî ó÷àñòâàò â íàó÷íè ôîðóìè, äèñêóñèè è ñúáèòèÿ ó íàñ è â ÷óæáèíà. Êîìèñèÿòà äàâà òðèáóíà íà èçñëåäîâàòåëè è îáùåñòâåíèöè äà àíàëèçèðàò äåéíîñòòà íà áèâøèòå òàéíè ñëóæ-áè ïðåç ïðèçìàòà íà ñúõðàíÿâàíèòå îò íåÿ äî-êóìåíòè. Ñúçäàäåíî å òÿñíî ñúòðóäíè÷åñòâî ñ àêàäåìè÷íàòà îáùíîñò. Ïîäïèñàíè ñà äâó-ñòðàííè ñïîðàçóìåíèÿ çà ñúâìåñòíà äåéíîñò ïî ïðîó÷âàíå è àíàëèçèðàíå íà äîêóìåíòèòå ñúñ Ñîôèéñêèÿ óíèâåðñèòåò è ñ Íîâ áúëãàðñêè óíèâåðñèòåò. Ñúâìåñòíàòà äåéíîñò âêëþ÷âà ïúëåí íàáîð îò ðàçíîîáðàçíè íàó÷íîèçñëåäî-âàòåëñêè, îáðàçîâàòåëíè, ïîïóëÿðèçàòîðñêè è àäìèíèñòðàòèâíè äåéíîñòè, ñâúðçàíè ñ èçñëåä-âàíåòî, îáðàáîòêàòà, äèãèòàëèçàöèÿòà è ïîïó-ëÿðèçèðàíåòî íà äîêóìåíòàëíîòî íàñëåäñòâî. Ñúçäàäåíî å òÿñíî ïàðòíüîðñòâî ñ Äúðæàâíà àãåíöèÿ „Àðõèâè“ è ïðåç 2013 ã. ñòàðòèðàõìå ðàáîòà ïî îáù ïðîåêò, ñâúðçàí ñ èçäàâàíåòî íà äîêóìåíòàëåí ñáîðíèê è îðãàíèçèðàíåòî íà

The Committee has taken it upon itself to con-duct its work in the spirit of openness and in co-

operation with state institutions, non-governmen-tal and public organisations. While the Committee is a frequent promoter of a rich variety of repre-sentative international conferences, its members are regular participants in scientific forums, dis-cussions and events home and abroad. The Com-mittee has set up a platform for researchers and opinion-makers to investigate the legacy of the former secret services in the light of the documen-tary evidence it left behind. A significant aspect of the Committee’s activities is the close cooperation with the academia. Bilateral agreements for col-laboration in research work and joint analysis of the documents of the archives have been signed with the Sofia University and the New Bulgarian University. These cooperation activities include a comprehensive mix of research, education, pro-motion and administration activities pertaining to the processes of exploration, processing, digitali-sation and dissemination of the documentary heri-tage. In 2013, work has also started on a common project to be implemented by the Committee and its reliable partner in the face of the Archives State

Ìåæäóíàðîäíà êîíôåðåíöèÿ, ïîñâåòåíà íà ñïàñÿâàíåòî íà áúëãàðñêèòå åâðåè (Ñîôèÿ, 2012)International conference dedicated to the savingof Bulgarian Jews (Sofia, 2012)

44

ÏàðòíüîðñòâàPartnerships

èçëîæáà. Ñúâìåñòíî ñ Áúëãàðñêàòà íàöèîíàë-íà ôèëìîòåêà îðãàíèçèðàìå äðóãè îáùè èíè-öèàòèâè. Îùå ñúñ ñúçäàâàíåòî ñè Êîìèñèÿòà çà ðàçêðè-âàíå íà àðõèâíèòå äîêóìåíòè íà êîìóíèñòè-÷åñêèòå òàéíè ñëóæáè â Áúëãàðèÿ ïðåäèçâèêà øèðîê ìåæäóíàðîäåí èíòåðåñ. Ñúâìåñòíî ñ ïàðòíüîðèòå ñè îò áèâøèòå èçòî÷íîåâðîïåé-ñêè äúðæàâè íà 16 äåêåìâðè 2008 ã. Êîìèñèÿòà ó÷àñòâà â ó÷ðåäÿâàíåòî íà Åâðîïåéñêàòà ìðå-æà çà ñúõðàíåíèå íà àðõèâèòå (ÅÌÑÀ), âêëþ÷-âàùà 7 äúðæàâè-÷ëåíêè (Áúëãàðèÿ, Ãåðìàíèÿ, Ïîëøà, Ðóìúíèÿ, Ñëîâàêèÿ, Óíãàðèÿ è ×åõèÿ) è 4 äúðæàâè-íàáëþäàòåëêè (Åñòîíèÿ, Ëàòâèÿ, Ëèòâà è Ñëîâåíèÿ). ×ðåç ìðåæàòà, äúðæàâèòå-÷ëåíêè âñå ïîâå÷å àêöåíòèðàò âúðõó çíà÷åíèå-òî çà îáùåñòâîòî íà îòâàðÿíåòî íà äîñèåòàòà, íà ïðàâíî-íîðìèðàíèÿ äîñòúï äî òÿõ è íà íå-çàâèñèìàòà íàó÷íîèçñëåäîâàòåëñêà äåéíîñò.Â ïåðèîäà þëè 2011 ã. – ôåâðóàðè 2012 ã. ÊÐ-ÄÎÏÁÃÄÑÐÑÁÍÀ îãëàâè ïðåäñåäàòåëñòâîòî íà Åâðîïåéñêàòà ìðåæà çà ñúõðàíåíèå íà àð-õèâèòå.

Agency. The initiative is scheduled to end with the publication of a collection of documents and a dis-play exhibition. A number of other shared initia-tives to be carried out together with the Bulgarian National Film Archive are underway. The Committee for disclosing the archives of the Bulgarian communist secret services of the past has attracted wide international attention from the very beginning. On 16 December 2008, it joined its array of partners from former Eastern Bloc countries to become one of the founding member organisations of the European Network of Official Authorities in Charge of the Secret-Police Files consisting of seven member countries (Bulgaria, Germany, Po-land, Romania, Slovakia, Hungary and the Czech Republic) and four observer countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovenia). Participation in the European Network will broaden the options of its member states to develop the focus on the social and public significance of the opening of the files, legally certain access thereto and independent re-search. Between July 2011 and February 2012 the CDDAABCSSISBNA held the presidency of the

Ïðåäñåäàòåëñêè ñúâåò íà ÅÌÑÀ (Ïðàãà, 2013 ã.)Session of the European Network (Prague, 2013)

45

ÏàðòíüîðñòâàPartnerships

Îñíîâíàòà çàäà÷à íà Êîìèñèÿòà ïðåç Ìàíäàò 2012-2017 ã. å â ðàìêèòå íà ìåæäóíàðîäíàòà ñè äåéíîñò è â áúäåùå äà ïðîäúëæè ñúòðóäíè-÷åñòâîòî ñ ïàðòíüîðñêèòå îðãàíèçàöèè îò Åâ-ðîïåéñêàòà ìðåæà çà ñúõðàíåíèå íà àðõèâèòå è äà ó÷àñòâà àêòèâíî â îáùèòå èíèöèàòèâè, êàòî îòíîâî êàíäèäàòñòâà çà ïîåìàíå íà ïðåä-ñåäàòåëñòâîòî íà ÅÌÑÀ, êîåòî ñå èçâúðøâà íà ðîòàöèîíåí ïðèíöèï.

Êîìèñèÿòà ñè å ïîñòàâèëà çà öåë:� äà ó÷àñòâà â èçñëåäîâàòåëñêàòà äåéíîñò íà

ïàðòíüîðñêèòå îðãàíèçàöèè;� äà ðàáîòà ïî ñúâìåñòíè ïðîåêòè;� äà ó÷àñòâà â ïóáëè÷íè ôîðóìè, îðãàíèçèðà-

íè îò ÷óæäåñòðàííèòå ïàðòíüîðñêè îðãàíè-çàöèè îò ìðåæàòà;

� ÷ëåíîâå îò Êîìèñèÿòà äà ó÷àñòâàò ñ èçêàçâà-íèÿ â ìåæäóíàðîäíè íàó÷íè ôîðóìè;

� äà ðàçøèðÿâà âúçìîæíîñòèòå çà ìåæäóíà-ðîäíî ñúòðóäíè÷åñòâî è ñ äðóãè äúðæàâè,êîèòî íå ñà ÷ëåíêè â ÅÌÑÀ.

European Network of Official Authorities in Charge of the Secret-Police Files. The Committee’s primary task for the 2012-2017 mandate is to concentrate its international efforts and future operations to continue to collaborate with partner organisations from the European Network of Official Authorities in Charge of the Secret-Police Files and actively participate in joint partnership ac-tion. The Committee is taking steps to apply for the presidency of the European Network (which is based on the rotation principle) for a second time.

The Committee has set itself the objectives of:� participating in research initiatives and pro-

grammes of partner organisations;� engaging in joint projects;� taking part in public forums and events promoted

by its international partners from the European Network;� encouraging its members to participate as speak-

ers in international science meetings;� extending international cooperation to other non-

member countries of the European Network.

Ðàáîòíà ñðåùà íà ÅÌÑÀ ñ ó÷àñòèåòî íà ïðåäñåäàòåëÿíà Êîìèñèÿòà Å. Êîñòàäèíîâ (Ïðàãà, 2013 ã.)

Chairman Kostadinov at a working meeting of the Network (Prague, 2013)

46

Êîãàòî ïðåç 2008 ã. Êîìèñèÿòà çàïî÷íà àê-òèâíî äåéíîñòòà ñè, îáùåñòâåíîòî âíèìà-

íèå íå áå ñèëíî àíãàæèðàíî êúì òåìàòà çà äî-ñèåòàòà. Íåäîâåðèåòî êúì ðàáîòàòà íà ìëàäàòà èíñòèòóöèÿ âçåìàøå âðúõ íàä äîâåðèåòî. Íå ñòàâàøå âúïðîñ çà íåäîâåðèå íà ïîëèòè÷åñêà îñíîâà, à ïî-ñêîðî çà ñêåïòè÷íè íàãëàñè. Ìî-òèâèòå áÿõà äîñòà ðàçëè÷íè. Îò åäíà ñòðàíà, òîâà áÿõà ðåçåðâè îòíîñíî äîñòîâåðíîñòòà íà ñàìàòà èíôîðìàöèÿ è ïúëíîòàòà íà àðõèâà; îò äðóãà, õîðàòà ñå ñúìíÿâàõà, ÷å ùå áúäàò èçâà-äåíè íà ñâåòëî âñè÷êè ñúòðóäíèöè íà áèâøàòà ÄÑ – íåùî, êîåòî ñå ïîäõðàíâàøå îò ïîëèòèöè, îò àíàëèçàòîðè, îò ïðîâåðåíè è ïîäëåæàùè íà ïðîâåðêà ëèöà. Íà òîçè îðãàí ñå ãëåäàøå êàòî íà èíñòðóìåíò íà óïðàâëÿâàùèòå, êîéòî ðàáîòè â èíòåðåñ íà âëàñòòà. Åäâà 17 % ïîñî÷âàõà, ÷å ñå èíòåðåñóâàò îò òîâà êàê ðàáîòè Êîìèñèÿòà ïî äîñèåòàòà. Â ñúùîòî âðåìå îáà÷å áÿõà ðå-ãèñòðèðàíè êàòî öÿëî ïîçèòèâíè îáùåñòâåíè íàãëàñè êúì çàêîíà, êîéòî ðåãëàìåíòèðà äåé-íîñòòà º. Çà ðàçêðèâàíå íà àãåíòóðíîòî ìèíà-ëî íà âñè÷êè ïóáëè÷íè ôèãóðè ó íàñ ñå îáÿâèõà 44%, à 25 % áÿõà ïðîòèâ. Äîñòà âèñîê áå äåëúò íà õîðàòà, êîèòî íÿìàò ìíåíèå ïî âúïðîñà – 31%. Ãîäèíà ïî-êúñíî ïðåç 2009 ã. ìíåíèåòî íà àíà-ëèçàòîðèòå âå÷å áå, ÷å òîâà, êîåòî ñå ïðàâè îò Êîìèñèÿòà, å ìèñèÿ ñ èñòîðè÷åñêà öåí-íîñò è ñòîéíîñò. Óñåùàíåòî, ÷å íåùàòà íàé-ïîñëå ñå ñëó÷âàò, äîâåäå è äî íàìàëÿâàíå ñ 6 ïóíêòà çà åäíà ãîäèíà íà íåäîâåðèåòî êúì ðàáîòàòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà. Ñàìî çà åäíà ãîäèíà ðàáîòà èçñëåäâàíèÿòà çà íàãëàñèòå íà îáùå-ñòâîòî ðåãèñòðèðàõà òðàéíè è êàòåãîðè÷íè íà-ãëàñè ïî îòíîøåíèå íà âúïðîñà òðÿáâà ëè äà áúäå îãëàñåíà èíôîðìàöèÿòà çà àãåíòóðíîòî ìèíàëî íà âñè÷êè ïóáëè÷íè ëèöà ó íàñ. Òîâà áå âúïðîñ, êîéòî èçèñêâàøå òðàéíî ðåøåíèå ñïî-ðåä ïîëîâèíàòà îò áúëãàðèòå.Ïðåäóáåäåíèòå êúì äåéíîñòòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà, ñïîðåä êîèòî íà÷èíúò, ïî êîéòî òÿ ðàáîòè, çà-ñòðàøàâà íàöèîíàëíàòà ñèãóðíîñò íà ñòðàíà-òà, çàïî÷íàõà äà íàìàëÿâàò. Òîâà áå íàèñòèíà ïðÿê ðåçóëòàò îò ñòèëà íà ðàáîòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà äî òîçè ìîìåíò, êàêòî è îò ñòåïåíòà íà ñðàáî-òåíîñò ìåæäó íåéíèòå ÷ëåíîâå.

When, in 2008, the Committee assumed its active duties the attention of the public was not greatly

excited with the topic of the secret files. Doubts and suspicions of the role and function of the newborn in-stitution took the upper hand. It was rather a matter of public skepticism than politically driven lack of confi-dence. A whole variety of reasons were at play. There were, on the one hand, hesitations on the credibility of information and legitimacy and integrity of the archives, and, on the other hand, doubts whether all collabora-tors of the former State Security would be brought out in the open. General fears were constantly played on by the statements of elected political figures, analysts, persons already examined or pending examination. The Committee was perceived as an instrument in the hands of authority figures to be twisted and ma-nipulated to the benefit of political power actors. Mere 17% of the participants in the survey expressed any interest at all in the dealings of the Committee for the Secret Police Files. Meanwhile, public opinion and at-titudes were, as a whole, in favour of the legislation governing its operations. 44% of poll participants took a positive attitude towards the public announcement of affiliation to the communist secret and intelligence services for all public figures, while 25% objected the idea. The percentage of people with no opinion on the subject was standing at a relatively high 31%. One year later, in 2009, analysts were already of the opinion that the work of the Committee is recognised as a worthy mission and a significant historical contri-bution. The sense that things are finally coming into place had generated a 6% drop in the level of distrust towards the Committee over the period of one year. Within the same time interval, opinions solidified and stable attitudes were formed towards the announce-ment of affiliation of all public figures to the communist secret and intelligence services. Half of Bulgarians demanded a lasting solution to the problem.The bias towards the Committee, manifested in the assumption that its work is used to the prejudice of the national interests and jeopardises national security, is on the decline. This is a direct result of the working methods adopted and practiced by the Committee so far, as well as the teamwork and partnership between its members.According to a large portion of poll participants inter-viewed in 2009, the Committee needed to exert maxi-

Ïîãëåäúò íà îáùåñòâîòî1 The view of the public1

1 Èçñëåäâàíåòî íà îáùåñòâåíèòå íàãëàñè å ðåçóëòàò îò ïðîó÷âàíèÿ íà ÍÖÈÎÌ.

1 Figures from a survey conducted by the National Center for Public Opinion.

47

Ïîãëåäúò íà îáùåñòâîòîThe view of the public

Ïðåç 2009 ã. ãîëÿìà ÷àñò îò õîðàòà âå÷å áÿõà íà ìíåíèå, ÷å Êîìèñèÿòà ïî äîñèåòàòà å äëúæ-íà äà ïîëîæè ìíîãî óñèëèÿ çà èçãðàæäàíå íà àðõèâ íà äîêóìåíòèòå íà áèâøèòå òàéíè ñëóæ-áè, êîéòî äà îñòàíå â íàöèîíàëíàòà íè èñòî-ðèÿ êàòî âàæåí äîêóìåíòàëåí ïðèíîñ. Íåùî ïîâå÷å, ïîäêðåïàòà íà ïîäîáíà èäåÿ îçíà÷à-âàøå, ÷å å íàëèöå ñúçíàíèå çà ïðåíàñÿíå íà èñòîðè÷åñêàòà ïàìåò êúì íîâèòå ïîêîëåíèÿ è çà „èçíàñÿíå íà çäðàâà ôàêòîëîãè÷íà îñíîâà“ íà òåìàòà çà äîñèåòàòà êàòî ÷àñò îò íàé-íîâàòà íè èñòîðèÿ, êîÿòî ñëåäâà äà íå îñòàíå íåïî-çíàòà è ãëàâíî ñïîðíà êàòî èíòåðïðåòàöèÿ çà ìëàäèòå ïîêîëåíèÿ áúëãàðè. Îêàçà ñå îáà÷å, ÷å å òðóäíî ìëàäèòå ïîêîëåíèÿ äà áúäàò ïðÿêî âúâëå÷åíè â òåìàòà è äà ïðîÿâÿâàò èíòåðåñ â ìîìåíò, êîãàòî âñå îùå ñå ðàáîòè ïî îãëàñÿíå íà ñúòðóäíèöèòå íà ñëóæáèòå.

mum effort to build an archive for the files of the former secret services, which would go down in national his-tory as an important documentary contribution. More-over, support for this idea pointed to awareness of the importance of preserving historical memory for gen-erations to come and of the significance of ‘a solid evi-dence base’ for the treatment of the issue. A reminder of our most recent history, secret police files are not an issue to remain vague and, above all, unresolved for the younger generations of Bulgarians. However, it did not prove easy to involve young people with the subject, attract their attention and provoke their inter-est at a time when the process of investigating and announcing affiliation is still underway. The interest of members of the Bulgarian community in the business and decisions of the Committee con-cerning public figures of the day, continued to further increase in 2010. The Committee made itself more

Ïðåç 2010 ã. äåëúò íà áúëãàðèòå, êîèòî ñå èí-òåðåñóâàò îò ðåøåíèÿòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà íà ïóá-ëè÷íè ëè÷íîñòè, ïðîäúëæè äà ðàñòå. Êîìèñèÿòà ñòàíà âñå ïî-ðàçïîçíàâàåìà çà îáùåñòâîòî, à ðàáîòàòà º ïîðàæäàøå èíòåðåñ ñðåä âñå ïî-âå÷å áúëãàðè. Ñðàâíåíèåòî íà ñîöèàëíî-äå-ìîãðàôñêèòå ïðîôèëè ïðåç ðàçëè÷íèòå ãîäè-íè ïîêàçà äâîéíî óâåëè÷åíèå íà èíòåðåñà íà ìëàäèòå õîðà íà âúçðàñò ïîä 30 ãîäèíè êúì ðåøåíèÿòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà ïî äîñèåòàòà. Îñâåí çà èíòåðåñ êúì ðåøåíèÿòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà, òåçè

visible and recognisable to domestic audiences while effectively attracting the attention of larger portions of society. The social and demographic profile of survey respondents over the years suggests a double in-crease in the number of young people under the age of 30 who are interested in the resolutions published by the Committee for the Secret Police Files. The poll evidence however went beyond a mere statement of increase of public interest. The Committee had managed to make its way into the spotlight of media and social attention, assume its place in the media

48


äàííè âå÷å ãîâîðåõà è çà ðåàëíî ìåäèéíî ïðè-ñúñòâèå, çà ïîäîáðÿâàíå íà ìåäèéíàòà âèçèÿ, êàêòî è çà ïîäîáðåíà êîìóíèêàöèÿ ñ øèðîêà-òà àóäèòîðèÿ. Ïðîäúëæè äà íàðàñòâà äåëúò íà óáåäåíèòå, ÷å èíôîðìàöèÿòà çà àãåíòóðíîòî ìèíàëî íà âñè÷êè ïóáëè÷íè ëèöà òðÿáâà äà áúäå îãëàñåíà. Òîâà áå îùå åäèí èíäèêàòîð çà òîâà, ÷å äåéíîñòòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà è íåéíèòå ðå-øåíèÿ íàìèðàò âñå ïî-äîáðîíàìåðåí ïðèåì â ïóáëè÷íîòî ïðîñòðàíñòâî.Ìàêàð è áàâíî, îáùåñòâåíîòî ìíåíèå ñå ðàç-êðåïîñòÿâàøå è åìàíöèïèðàøå ùî ñå îòíàñÿ äî ïóáëè÷íèÿ îáðàç íà Êîìèñèÿòà ïî äîñèåòà-òà è äî îöåíêèòå çà íåéíàòà ðàáîòà. Ïðîìåíèòå, êîèòî íàñòúïâàõà â îáùåñòâå-íîòî ìíåíèå, áÿõà áàâíè, íî òðàéíè è îïðå-äåëåíî ïîëîæèòåëíè.Ïðåäñòàâàòà, ÷å Êîìèñèÿòà ñëåäâà íåèçìåííî èçèñêâàíèÿòà íà çàêîíà è íå ïðîèçâåæäà íà-ïðåæåíèÿ è êîíôëèêòè, îñòàíà ïðåç ãîäèíèòå.Â ñðåäàòà íà ïúðâèÿ ìàíäàò ãîëåìèòå âúïðîñè-òåëíè ïðåä îáùåñòâåíîòî ìíåíèå âñå îùå áÿõà â ðàìêèòå íà öåííîñòíèÿ êîíòåêñò íà ïðåöåí-êèòå – òîâà áÿõà íðàâñòâåíî-ìîðàëíè âúïðî-ñèòåëíè, êîèòî òåïúðâà ðàç÷èòàõà äà ïîëó÷àò óäîâëåòâîðèòåëíè îòãîâîðè. Òîâà ïðåäïîëàãà-øå äèñêóñèè ïî áàçèñíè öåííîñòíè âúïðîñè, êúäåòî Êîìèñèÿòà è íåéíàòà äåéíîñò äà ñå ïðåïëèòàò ñ ïî-ãëîáàëíè íðàâñòâåíè òåìè ïðåä ñúâðåìåííèòå õîðà.Ïðîìåíèòå â îáùåñòâåíîòî ìíåíèå ïî îòíîøå-íèå íà ïðåäìåòà íà ðàáîòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà ïðî-òè÷àò áàâíî, íî â ïîçèòèâíà ïîñîêà è íåîáðàòè-ìî. Ãîëåìèòå âúïðîñèòåëíè ïðåä îáùåñòâåíîòî ìíåíèå îñòàâàò â ðàìêèòå íà öåííîñòíèÿ êîí-òåêñò íà ïðåöåíêèòå. Òîâà ñà íðàâñòâåíî-ìî-ðàëíè âúïðîñèòåëíè, êîèòî òåïúðâà ùå ðàç÷è-òàò äà ïîëó÷àò óäîâëåòâîðèòåëíè îòãîâîðè.23 ãîäèíè ñëåä íà÷àëîòî íà äåìîêðàòè÷íèòå ïðîìåíè, â íà÷àëîòî íà 2012 ã., 48% îò áúëãà-ðèòå ñà íà ìíåíèå, ÷å áèâøàòà ÄÑ å áèëà ðåï-ðåñèâåí àïàðàò. Ïåò ïúòè ïî-ìàëêî ñà íàìèðà-ùèòå ïîäîáíî îïðåäåëåíèå çà íåïðèëîæèìî êúì áèâøàòà ÄÑ. Ïîñòîÿííî ðàñòå äåëúò íà áúëãàðèòå, ñïîðåä êîèòî èíôîðìàöèÿòà çà àãåíòóðíîòî ìèíàëî íà âñè÷êè ïóáëè÷íè ëèöà òðÿáâà äà áúäå îãëà-

landscape, enhance its image in the public eye, and achieve two-way communication with the wider audi-ence. The share of respondents convinced that full disclosure of the identity of all public figures formerly affiliated to the state security services is the way to go is high and growing. This further indicated a steady increase in public approval rates for the Committee, its proceedings and the outcome thereof.Bulgarian society was warming up, albeit slowly, to this idea of publicity and was beginning to recognise and accept the image of the Committee for the Secret Police Files and acknowledge the effects of its work. Permanent and, above all, positive changes in pub-lic sentiments were taking place at a slow pace to a lasting effect. Perceptions of the Committee as law-abiding institu-tion acting in strict compliance with the rule of law and avoiding tension and conflicts remained unchanged over the years.Halfway through the first mandate, the consciousness of the public was still occupied primarily with concerns about the ethical implications of judgements. Those were all questions concerning moral and ethical stan-dards which had to be addressed to a satisfactory con-clusion. This would involve discussions on fundamen-tal moral principles where account would be taken of the activities of the Committee in the context of more universal ethical questions facing modern societies.The positive change taking place in the mentality of the general public, as regards matters within the scope of competence of the Committee, is taking place slowly but surely to become a permanent state of mind. The ethical implications of judgements remain a major concern for the public. These are all questions con-cerning moral and ethical principles which remain to be dealt with in search for satisfactory answers.In the beginning of 2012, 23 years since the onset of democratic changes, some 48% of Bulgarians hold the opinion that the former State Security was a re-pressive apparatus. Other respondents find this de-scription to neither fit, nor describe the modus ope-randi of the former services of the State Security. The number of the latter is five times less than the number of the former.Bulgarian society is experiencing a steady increase in the numbers of citizens insisting that affiliation of all public figures to the former state security services

49


ñÿâàíà (îò 44% ïðåç ìàðò 2008 ã. íà 57% ïðåç ôåâðóàðè 2012 ã.). Èíòåðåñúò êúì ðàáîòàòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà å òðàé-íî âèñîê ñðåä ãðàæäàíèòå íà âúçðàñò ìåæäó 40 è 60 ã., ñðåä æèâååùèòå â ñòîëèöàòà è â ãîëå-ìèòå ãðàäîâå, ñðåä âèñîêîîáðàçîâàíèòå è çà-ìîæíèòå. Ðàñòå èíòåðåñúò íà ìëàäèòå õîðà êúì äåéíîñòòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà ïî äîñèåòàòà. Ïðåç ôåâðóàðè 2009 ã. ìëàäèòå ïîä 30 ã., êîèòî ñà ñå èíòåðåñóâàëè îò ðàáîòàòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà, ñà áèëè 9%, à ïðåç 2012 ã. òå âå÷å ñà 29%.Èíòåðåñúò â íîâèòå ïîêîëåíèÿ áúëãàðè çà-ïî÷íà áàâíî äà ñå çàðàæäà, êîãàòî íåùàòà

should be made common knowledge (44% in March 2008 compared to 57% in February 2012). A constant high percentage of the well-educated, well-to-do residents of the capital and of big cities between the ages of 40 and 60 acknowledge to taking interest in what the Committee is doing. The Committee for the Secret Police Files is drawing increasing attention from the younger generations. The share of respon-dents under the age of 30 who are aware of the work of the Committee has increased from 9% in February 2009 to 29% in 2012.The new generations of Bulgarians appeared to develop a gradual interest in the Committee’s mis-

50


ìîæåõà äà èì áúäàò ïðåäñòàâåíè ñïîêîéíî, èíòåðïðåòàöèèòå íå âîäåõà äî îáùåñòâåíî íà-ïðåæåíèå è êîíôðîíòàöèè, à àðõèâúò îòðåæäà-øå íà òåìàòà âàæíî ìÿñòî â íîâàòà èñòîðèÿ. Ïî òàêúâ íà÷èí íîâèòå ãåíåðàöèè çàïî÷íàõà äà ñúçäàâàò ñúïðè÷àñòíîñò êúì åäíà èëè äðóãà òåìà.Îöåíêèòå çà ðàáîòàòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà ïî äîñè-åòàòà ïðåç ãîäèíèòå ñà ïî-ñêîðî ïîçèòèâíè. Ñïîðåä åäíà ÷åòâúðò îò áúëãàðèòå, ñ ðàáî-òàòà ñè Êîìèñèÿòà ïî äîñèåòàòà å ïîâèøè-ëà îáùåñòâåíèÿ èíòåðåñ ïî òåìàòà. Òàêà, îò ñúçäàâàíåòî íà Êîìèñèÿòà, ñ 10% íàðàñòâà äåëúò íà áúëãàðèòå, ñïîðåä êîèòî òÿ ñúóìÿâà äà ïðèâëè÷à îáùåñòâåíèÿ èíòåðåñ êúì òåìà-òà. Ïðåç 2008 ã. õîðàòà, êîèòî òâúðäÿõà, ÷å Êîìèñèÿòà íå ñúóìÿâà äà ïðèâëè÷à îáùåñò-âåí èíòåðåñ, áÿõà äâà ïúòè ïîâå÷å îò îíåçè, êîèòî êîíñòàòèðàõà ïîâèøåí îáùåñòâåí èí-òåðåñ ïî òåìàòà. Ñåãà ñèòóàöèÿòà å ïðîìå-íåíà – äÿëîâåòå íà äàâàùèòå ïîëîæèòåëíè è îòðèöàòåëíè îöåíêè âå÷å ñà èçðàâíåíè. Îêî-ëî äâå òðåòè îò òðàéíî èíòåðåñóâàùèòå ñå îò ðàáîòàòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà ïîñî÷âàò, ÷å òÿ å óñïÿëà äà çàñèëè îáùåñòâåíèÿ èíòåðåñ êúì ðàáîòàòà ñè.Çà ïîñëåäíèòå ãîäèíè áå ðåãèñòðèðàí ïî-âèøåí èíòåðåñ êúì èíòåðíåò ñòðàíèöàòà íà Êîìèñèÿòà, êàêòî è êúì ñïåöèàëèçèðàíèòå èíôîðìàöèîííè ñàéòîâå â Èíòåðíåò. Òîâà å èíäèêàöèÿ çà ïîòðåáíîñò îò àâòåíòè÷íà èí-ôîðìàöèÿ. Â íà÷àëîòî íà âòîðèÿ ìàíäàò íà Êîìèñèÿòà „ÇÀ“ ïðîìåíè â äåéñòâàùèÿ çàêîí çà äîñèå-òàòà ñå îáÿâèõà îêîëî åäíà òðåòà îò áúëãàðè-òå, êàòî 25% èñêàõà äà ñå ðàçøèðè îáõâà-òúò íà ïðîâåðÿâàíèòå ëèöà è ñ ïðîìåíèòå â çàêîíà òîâà ñå ñëó÷è. Çà ïî-âúçðàñòíèòå, êîèòî ñïîäåëÿõà ïîäîáíî ìíåíèå, áå âàæíî òàçè ñòðàíèöà îò èñòîðèÿòà äà íå ñå çàòâàðÿ íåïðî÷åòåíà. Ìîæå äà ñå î÷àêâà, ÷å îò ñòå-ïåíòà íà îòâîðåíîñò è äîñòúïíîñò íà ïîäîáíà èíôîðìàöèÿ ùå çàâèñè è èíòåðåñúò íà ìëàäè-òå õîðà êúì òåìàòà çà äîñèåòàòà â áúäåùå.

sion and activities when facts could be presented in a calm and reasonable manner, interpretations of events would not trigger disturbance and commotion, and the archives would ensure a prominent place for the secret police files in recent history. Thus, the new generations became increasingly aware and informed about a wide range of topics. The performance of the Committee for the secret po-lice files has received generally rather positive assess-ments over the years. The Committee is recognised for its efforts to raise public awareness and attention to the topic of the secret files by one-fourth of Bulgar-ians participating in the survey. This represents a 10% increase in the recognition of its status since its estab-lishment. According to results of the 2008 polls, the number of respondents maintaining the opinion that the Committee is failing in its duty to engage the atten-tion of the public and promote the topic was twice the number of poll participants insisting on the exact op-posite. The tables are reversed now. An equal number of respondents feel positive and negative about the impact of the Committee. About two-thirds of those closely following its proceedings acknowledge the accomplishments and role of the Committee in raising awareness and enhancing the popular-ity of the topics on its agenda.Online visitor traffic to both the website of the Commit-tee and specialised online news media on the subject has increased over the recent years. This trend has highlighted the need and demand for trusted sources of reliable information.In the beginning of the second mandate of the Com-mittee nearly one-third of Bulgarian citizens declared approval of potential changes to the relevant legis-lation on the secret police files. 25% were looking forward to see the scope of examined persons extended, a development brought about by the lat-er amendments to the law. Older generations who shared the view believed that before turning this page of history, we need to read it in a loud and intelligible voice. A safe assumption can be made that the ease of use and access to this kind of information will shape the awareness of young generations of the history of secret police files.

51

Ðå÷íèê Glossary

à.å. Àðõèâíà åäèíèöà File unitÀÌÂÐ Àðõèâ íà Ìèíèñòåðñòâîòî íà âú-

òðåøíèòå ðàáîòè Ministry of the Interior Archives

ÀÌÂíÐ Àðõèâ íà Ìèíèñòåðñòâîòî íà âúíøíèòå ðàáîòè

Ministry of the Exterior Archives

ÀÍÐÑ Àðõèâ íà Íàöèîíàëíàòà ðàçóçíà-âàòåëíà ñëóæáà

National Intelligence Service Archives

ÂÅ Âðàæåñêà åìèãðàöèÿ Enemy EmigrationÂÃÓ Âòîðî ãëàâíî óïðàâëåíèå (íà

ÄÑ) Second Head Directorate (of the SS)

ÂÐ Âåðáîâú÷íà ðàçðàáîòêà Recruitment dossierÃÄ Ãðóïîâà ðàçðàáîòêà Group surveillance dossierÃÄÎÐ Ãðóïîâî äåëî çà îïåðàòèâíà ðàç-

ðàáîòêà Group case for operative development

ÃÎ Ãðàíè÷åí îòðÿä Border squadÃÑÓ Ãëàâíî ñëåäñòâåíî óïðàâëåíèå Head Directorate for InvestigationÄÄÑ Äèðåêöèÿ Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò State Security DirectorateÄÂ Äîâåðåíà âðúçêà Confidential ConnectionÄÇ Äîáðîâîëåí çàÿâèòåë Voluntary informerÄÈÀ Äèðåêöèÿ „Èíôîðìàöèÿ è àðõèâ”

(íà ÌÂÐ) Information and Records Directorate

ÄË Äîâåðåíî ëèöå Confidential informantÄÎÍ Äåëî çà îïåðàòèâíî íàáëþäåíèå Operative surveillance actÄÎÏ Äåëî çà îïåðàòèâíà ïðîâåðêà Operative control act ÄÎÐ Äåëî çà îïåðàòèâíà ðàçðàáîòêà Operative development actÄÑ Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò State SecurityÇ/À Çàäãðàíè÷åí àãåíò Overseas spyÈÄ Èíôîðìàöèîííî äåëî Information fileÈÐ Èçìåííèê íà ðîäèíàòà National traitorÈÏÖ Èäåîëîãè÷åñêè ïîäðèâíè öåí-

òðîâå Ideological subversive centers

ÊÀ Ñëóæáà „Êàðòîòåêà è àðõèâ” (â ÏÃÓ)

Files and Archives Service

ÊÂ Êàíäèäàò çà âåðáîâêà Candidate for recruitmentÊÃÁ Êîìèòåò çà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò

(íà ÑÑÑÐ) Committee for State Security (KGB - USSR)

ÊÄÑ Êîìèòåò çà Äúðæàâíà ñèãóðíîñò (íà ÍÐÁ)

Committee for State Security

ÊÊ Êîíñïèðàòèâíà êâàðòèðà Secret abodeÊÐÎ Êîíòðàðàçóçíàâàòåëåí îòäåë Counter-intelligence departmentËÐ Ëè÷íà ðàçðàáîòêà Individual surveillance dossier

Frequently used abbreviationsÍàé-÷åñòî ñðåùàíè ñúêðàùåíèÿ

52

Ðå÷íèêGlossary

Ì„Âèõðåí“ Êîíòðîë âúðõó ëè÷íà è ñëóæåáíà êîðåñïîíäåíöèÿ

Check on private and business correspondence

M„Êàíàë“ Måðîïðèÿòèÿ ïî ÂÅ (âðàæåñêà åìèãðàöèÿ)

Surveillance operations against hostile emigrants

Ì„Ëú÷“ Ïîäáîð è âåðáóâàíå íà ÷óæ-äè ãðàæäàíè çà àãåíòè

Recruitment of foreigners as agents

Ì „Ïèðèí” Ïîäñëóøâàíå íà äîìàøåí è ñëó-æåáåí òåëåôîí

Home and business phone tapping

Ì„Ðîäîïè“ Ïîäñëóøâàíå ÷ðåç ìîíòèðàí ìè-êðîôîí â äîìà

Bugging of private premises

ÍÊÂÄ Íàðîäåí êîìèñàðèàò çà âúòðåø-íè ðàáîòè (íà ÑÑÑÐ)

People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs (USSR)

Í.Ð Íåëåãàëåí ðàçóçíàâà÷ Clandestine intelligence agentÍÑÇÊ Íàöèîíàëíà ñëóæáà çà çàùèòà

íà Êîíñòèòóöèÿòà National Service for Constitution Protection

ÍÑÒ Íàöèîíàëåí ñúþç íà òðóäà National Labor UnionÎÂ Îïåðàòèâíà âðúçêà Operational contactÎÄ Îò÷åòíî äåëî Performance fileÎÐ Îïåðàòèâåí ðàáîòíèê Operative workerÎÐÎÍ Îïåðàòèâåí ðàáîòíèê íà îá-

ùåñòâåíè íà÷àëà Operative worker on public basis

ÎÑÄ Îïåðàòèâíî ñïðàâî÷íî äåëî Operative reference fileÏÂ Ïóíêòîâå çà âðúçêà Point of contractÏÂÑ Ïðîêóðàòóðà íà âúîðúæåíèòå

ñèëè National Military Prosecutor’s Office

ÏÃÓ Ïúðâî ãëàâíî óïðàâëåíèå (íà ÄÑ) First head DirectorateÏÈ Ïðåäñòàâëÿâàù èíòåðåñ Target of interestÏÄß Ïîñòîÿííî äåéñòâàùà ÿâêà Permanent safe houseÏË Ïåðñïåêòèâíî ëèöå Perspective personÑÊÊ Ñúþçíà êîíòðîëíà êîìèñèÿ Union control committeeÑÑ Ñåêðåòåí ñúòðóäíèê Secret collaboratorÓÁÎ Óïðàâëåíèå áåçîïàñíîñò è îõðà-

íà (Ïåòî óïðàâëåíèå íà ÄÑ)Security and protection Directorate (5th Directorate of the SS)

ô. Ôîíä FundÔÀ Ôàìèëåí àðõèâ Family archivesÕÊÀ Õàçÿèí íà êîíñïèðàòèâíà êâàð-

òèðà Owner of clandestine lodging

ÖÄÀ Öåíòðàëåí äúðæàâåí àðõèâ Central State ArchivesÖÏÀ Öåíòðàëåí ïàðòèåí àðõèâ Central Party ArchivesÖÐÓ Öåíòðàëíî ðàçóçíàâàòåëíî óï-

ðàâëåíèå Central Intelligence Agency

ßÊ ßâî÷íà êâàðòèðà Recruiting place

BG EN BG EN izdania/BROSHURA-3.pdf · 1 Ñúäúðæàíèå Contents 1. Äóìè íà...

Documents

Transcript of BG EN BG EN izdania/BROSHURA-3.pdf · 1 Ñúäúðæàíèå Contents 1. Äóìè íà...